WPC4 "A$PPRR774Hf`d->aTkJuW:%P, lGyX<'wH1EAIY̏dc xIiSW_(26[YDH:4#W6Ǯh;DdI0G촿ٞ(_*!6K7GrsB4Kq:֜?M1#-:zB;A':;Bj }aoRo+.0:j5o8*ǩ2ep}S%z'M ~!ku=/um )WGU4ٞa?Ip?2SYiFgnV!:h"NAa(1@\kb!)I-~m^N3n;׌ -ϷrX'ZRTSƐ-\P=ka-%_IHDy01 `#@U> %? 0(E UBm 4  n U: f  "' I & 0m 0DjjjN^ w m B ASI 0V 0Ve 0D D5HP LaserJet 4Si,,,,,,0<( 9Z &Courier RegularX(~$4h   XWXXX7|XXdXXd7    iUX` hp x (#%'0*,.8135@8:<H?AXi<6X9`(*Courier 12pt10cpiq\;'3|x<6X9`(*Courier 12pt10cpiXXx6X@JQX@,rAZ"Arial Regular \\RA' Legal\       ["USUS.,   XXXX ;X X  _  Ad FILED M ;  January4,2000 && Cecil_Crowson_,Jr. ff AppellateCourt_ClerkdA _ ((3y$ ~!4h   XXXX8UXXdd8    iUX` hp x (#%'0*,.8135@8:<H?AXi     0  (#$  0  3$(L U dZ[\]_E<<CLevel 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5(.3$ !USUS.,  (.3$ !USUS.,  ($$   1  $$$$)!dxdx ~!4h   XXXX8UXXdd8    iUX` hp x (#%'0*,.8135@8:<H?AXi  _TR[A' LegalX3' Letter A' Legal3'T4Xh † :!_vY _@0,j: `@E tt( Wv_8 @ D INTHECOURTOFCRIMINALAPPEALSOFTENNESSEE  @~~%DATKNOXVILLE@@44R      h OCTOBER1999SESSION   x    ALICIASHAYNELOVERA,  ) 80     h   )    Appellant, h   )  No.03C019901CC00030       h   )       h   )  SevierCounty   v.    h   )       h   )  Hon.RexH.Ogle,Judge       h   ) z  STATEOFTENNESSEE,0 h   )  (Postconviction)0 h%h%h` % %     h   ) NF  Appellee. h   ) 4, Ӏ CONCURRINGOPINION      Iconcurinthemajorityopinion.However,Idisagreewithitsassumptionthat  becauseofStatev.BrendaAnneBurns,No.W199500004SCR11CD,HenryCounty  (Tenn.Nov.8,1999)(forpublication),ourstandardofreviewontheineffectiveassistance VN ofcounselclaimisdenovo.Sincedayoneofthecreationofpostconvictionprocedures, "! thefindingsofthetrialcourtinapostconvictioncasehavebeengiventheweightofajury " verdict.SeeJanowv.State,4Tn.Crim.App.195,200,470S.W.2d19,21(1971).In $! fact,inreviewingtheissueoftheeffectiveassistanceofcounsel,oursupremecourtstated &~# thatit mustnowdeterminewhethertheevidenceintherecordpreponderatesagainstthe R(J!% trialcourtsfindingthatthepetitionerfailedtoestablishthathewasdeniedhis *#' constitutionalrighttoeffectiveassistanceofcounsel.Henleyv.State,960S.W.2d572, +$) 580(Tenn.1997).Inthisrespect,Idonotbelievethatthesupremecourtintendedinone -&+ sentence,withoutfurtherdiscussion,tooverrulesub_silentio_overthirtyyearsof /z(- jurisprudenceregardingthestandardofreviewinpostconvictioncases.Thus,Ibelieve N1F*/ thatthestandardofreviewremainswhethertheevidencepreponderatesagainstthetrial 3,1 courtsfindingthatthepetitionerreceivedtheeffectiveassistanceofcounsel. 4-3     h      p _________________________ d9\28     h      p JosephM.Tipton,Judge