WPC /# U: % 0(b w@!4au 0J 0T 0^* 0h 0r 0|b 0 0d 1u 0diU*B) 0@ D3` B DC AM @ v~[ v AQ 0D 0D D/K BzHP LaserJet 4SiHPPCL5MS,,,,,,0nL(,rAZ"Arial RegularX($- - DUUUDDPӀzz!+,,--../3|x2 0Indent123  2" 0Indent20 23  2, 0Indent30 0 23  26 0Indent40 0 0 23  2@ 0Indent50 0 0 0 23  2J 0Indent60 0 0 0 0 23  2T 0Indent70 0 0 0 0 0 23  2^ 0Indent80 0 0 0 0 0 0 23   ?AGMSYaioIndent0I.A.1.a.(1)(a)i)a)P 8Mac DefaultMac Default ` X<  9p`(Arial% Line 7 d("$    """"'dxd d7Border 1dd* #C << G  !  #d#  +"     YYY FILEDX May29,1997CecilCrowson,Jr.AppellateCourtClerk PtPtHH(FG(HH(d'hStyl{WP}01  HH  2$HH  Geneva  <Px443!#4$*$$*$ KK  Geneva  Geneva .,6 Geneva   h HD: Geneva  h HD: Geneva *+ ,-C<< CLevel 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5(3$ !  ($$   1  ..' dxdP Pd ! .          \RA'\\RA'\7XXdd7    ћ @ INTHECOURTOFCRIMINALAPPEALSOFTENNESSEE̜*R$%#A1-j|/k`  `@Rߛ@ ATJACKSON@ FEBRUARY1995STATEOFTENNESSEE   )      ) APPELLEE    ) NO.02C019410CC00209      )            ) HAYWOODCOUNTYVS.      )      ) HON.DICKJERMAN,JR.      ) JUDGEDEREKMANNS    )      ) (CertifiedQuestionofLaw) APPELLANT    )FORTHEAPPELLANT:    FORTHEAPPELLEE:FrankDeslauriers     CharlesW.BursonAttorneyatLaw     AttorneyGeneralP.O.Box1156   Covington,TN38019    RebeccaL.Gundt       AssistantAttorneyGeneral       450JamesRobertsonParkway       Nashville,TN372430493       LarryHardister       DistrictAttorneyGeneral       109E.FirstStreet       Trenton,TN38382OPINIONFILED:____________________AFFIRMEDJERRYSCOTT,SPECIALJUDGE  @ OPINION X ThisisanappealofacertifiedquestionoflawpursuanttoTenn.R.App.P.37(b)(2)(i). Pursuanttohisguiltyplea,theappellantwasconvictedofpossessionofcocainewithintenttosellordeliverforwhichhereceivedasentenceofeightyearsinthestatepenitentiaryasaRangeI,standardoffender.ThequestionϜreservedonappealisframedaswhetherthesearchandseizureofabrownpapersackcontainingtenindividuallywrappedpackagesofcocainewasinviolationoftheFourthAmendmenttotheUnitedStatesConstitutionandArticle1,7oftheTennesseeConstitution. OnDecember15,1993atapproximately6:50p.m.,DanielZartmanoftheBrownsvillePoliceDepartmentwasonhiswayhome.Hesawacarinastallofacarwashwithitshoodupandnoonearoundit.Therewasablackpickuptruckwithatrailerparkedfifteentotwentyfeetfromthevehicleinthestall.Apersonwhomtheofficercouldnotidentifyranfromthepickuptrucktothecarinthestall,openedthedooronthedriversside,leanedinside,thenranbacktothetruck.Afterafewseconds,thepersonranbacktothecar,closeditshoodanddroveaway.Thetruckdroveawayatthesametime,passingtheofficerscar. Mr.Zartmanfollowedthecarand,uponseeingthedriverturnleftwithoutgivinganysortofsignal,hestoppedthecarformakinganimproperturn.Astheytalked,theofficersawasmallsandwichtypepapersackstickingoutoftheseatonthedriversside.Theappellantrefusedtoconsenttoasearchofhiscar.  Astheofficerwaswritingtheappellantatrafficcitation,anotherofficerarrivedwithadrugdogandthedogalertedonthedriverssideofthecar. Mr.Zartmantestifiedthathewasinitiallysuspiciousoftheappellantbecausetherehadbeenpreviousburglariesatthecarwash.Further,theappellantsaidhewascheckinghisoilatthecarwash,butheneversawtheappellantdoinganythingunderhishood.Inaddition,theappellantwouldnotacknowledgethepresenceofthetruckatthecarwashorthesackinhiscarwhenaskedaboutit.Heactedverynervousandwouldnotstandstill,butwalkedbackandfortharoundthebackofhiscar.WhenMr.Zartmanaskedifhecouldlookinthesack,theappellantsaid yeahbutjumpedinfrontofthedoorandstoppedtheofficerbeforehecoulddoso. Theappellantdoesnotcontesttheinitialstopforthetrafficviolation.Heconcedesthatthesniffingbythedrugdogwasnotasearch.Themainthrustofhisargumentseemstobethelengthoftimehewasdetainedatthesceneawaitingthearrivalofthedog. Investigativestopsareauthorizedbyourcourts,Statev.Oody,823S.W.2d554,561(Tenn.Crim.App.1991),iftheofficercanpointtospecificandϜarticulablefactswhich,takentogetherwithrationalinferencesfromthosefacts,reasonablywarrantthedetention.Statev.Pulley,863S.W.2d29,3031(Tenn.1993)citingTerryv.Ohio,392U.S.1,21,88S.Ct.1868,1880,20L.Ed.2d889(1968). Here,theofficercitesnumerousspecificandarticulablefactswhich,takentogetherwithrationalinferencesfromthosefacts,clearlywarrantedthedetentionoftheappellantuntilthedrugdogarrived.Hissuspiciousactionsatthecarwashbygoingbackandforthtothetruck,thepresenceofwhichhewouldnotacknowledge,followedbyhisrefusaltoacknowledgethepresenceofthebagandhisnervousandagitatedstate,takenwithalltheothercircumstances,clearlyjustifiedthestop.Adefendantsfurtiveconductcanbeconsideredbyanofficertojustifyaninvestigativestop.Statev.Banner,685S.W.2d298,300(Tenn.Crim.App.1984). Thetrialjudgefoundthattheofficershadprobablecausetosearchtheappellantscarbasedonthedrugdogshavingalertedonthecarandbasedontheappellantsactionsandresponses.Ofcourse,atrialjudgesfindingsoffactonamotiontosuppressareconclusiveonappealunlesstheevidencepreponderatesagainstthosefindings.Statev.Turnbill,640S.W.2d40,4546(Tenn.Crim.App.1982).Theevidenceherecertainlydoesnotpreponderateagainstthosefindings. Thejudgmentoverrulingthemotiontosuppressisaffirmed.           _______________________________      JERRYSCOTT,SPECIALJUDGECONCUR:̜_______________________________JOSEPHM.TIPTON,JUDGE̜_______________________________DAVIDH.WELLES,JUDGE̛̛̛̛̛̛̛̛̜