WPC C?N]Pm3\{ ڍX~jl,QDĬ.yZa =R#X]r) js wpNTj]"~8y`9*MНe7u6JE߶9brsRFdxEBrBH@U LChXϹiA)ɁW'v8& B,mXI5Vvm ?1 ⠁)m0θ|@iWqH}7bTm5E9_Hh;odM8GǻҶVSiAA;tJ&JE)kK)o+YF{+x`&Ty;VBFڂ[Rx(zݫX)rڧrɜgthL$mbNr%i6#(ە1҉GEfmZ^t80ćM] %^  0(U: w> 4Z n N}  m #! 0! 0D U: X U:uU:U:***************** AO?? 0D D/I Bxxxx 0 D3 BXNa'L (`$TR[A' Legal3'A' Legal3'T7GXXdXXd7  ,  AZ"Arial RegularӀ@q'bk2ۤ3|xUHP LaserJet 8000 Series PS0((3$ `!TR[A' Legal3'A' Legal3'T8yXXdd8    `   0  (#$  0  ,  AZ"Arial Regular _OiXX  (USUS., `   1    ReviewofTDOCdisciplinarydecisionsarenotencompassedundertheUniform  AdministrativeProceduresAct.SeeMandelav.Campbell,978S.W.2d531,533(Tenn.1998).  SeealsoE.L.Reidv.W.G.Lutche,No.01A109803CH00168(Tenn.App.atNashville,Mar.29, | 1999)(Tenn.CodeAnn.45106(b),theMandelaopinion,andthe1998amendmenttoTenn. B : CodeAnn.45102(10)haveclearlyshutthedooronanyfutureuseoftheUAPAtochallenge   disciplinaryproceedingsintheDepartmentofCorrection).,cAZ"Arial Regular  XXXXeXX Ad   FILEDXXe   November17,1999  CecilCROWSON,Jr.AppellateCourtClerk ,cAZ"Arial Regular XXXX Ad   !XXFILEDXX!   XXNovember17,1999 ff CecilCROWSON,Jr.AppellateCourtClerk ,cAZ"Arial RegularLevel 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5(0*+C<< CLevel 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5($$   1  ,,' dxdP Pd(3a)$ `!TR[A' Legal3'A' Legal3'T8yXXdd8   \\\\'dxd d `!TR[A' Legal3'A' Legal3'T8XXdd8   _  l'26&"h 8` `E ` 2ttxJ lo'29)%h< `E  t Xo_@. . INTHECOURTOFCRIMINALAPPEALSOFTENNESSEE   q'2;+'h|{ `EC t ; +q ;;T$T$@** !ATKNOXVILLE   @; ; !OCTOBERSESSION,1999 T$T$;;HAROLDW.MAYSand h   * (L  BILLNARRMORE,0  0hT$T$0hT$hT$*8 T$T$  `     h   *  No.03C019904CR00126 $   ` Appellants,   h   *    `     h   *  MORGANCOUNTY   vs. `     h   *    `     h   *  Hon.E.EugeneEblen,Judge   STATEOFTENNESSEE, h 0  *T$T$  `     h   *  (WritofHabeasCorpus)   ` Appellee.   h   * t  FortheAppellants:   h     FortheAppellee: 6  JoeH.Walker   0 h 0hT$hT$  PaulG.Summers  T$T$ PublicDefenderand h 0  0T$T$AttorneyGeneralandReporter!T$T$  SusanCoreaFuller  h  " Asst.PublicDefenderP.O.Box334  0 h 0hT$hT$0T$T$ EllenH.Pollack $T$T$ Harriman,TN377480 h 0hT$hT$0T$T$AssistantAttorneyGeneral  (#  @(#  @(#  @(#  @(#  @(#  @(#  n% CriminalJusticeDivision T$T$  `     h     425FifthAvenueNorth `     h     2dFloor,CordellHullBuilding `     h     Nashville,TN372430493 x   (#  )*!  `  `     h      `     h     J.ScottMcCluen  + $  `     h     DistrictAttorneyGeneral `     h     P.O.Box703 `     h     Kingston,TN37763OPINIONFILED:򀀀 2(, AFFIRMED DavidG.Hayes, Judge R8v-2   >9b.3  XU<XXX@+ OPINION   `  Theappellants,HaroldW.MaysandBillNarrmore,correctionalinmatesat   theBrushyMountainCorrectionalComplex,appealfromthesummarydismissaloftheirjointprosepetitionforwritofhabeascorpus.Onappeal,theappellantsargue h`  (1)thetrialcourterredbydismissingthepetitionwithoutahearingand(2)thetrialcourtshouldhaveconsideredthepetitionasoneforpostconvictionrelief. ` Afterreview,weaffirmthedismissalofthepetition.@ff) Background    ` OnAugust19,1998,theappellants,whileservingsentencesatBrushyMountain,testedpositivefollowingrandomprisondrugscreenings.Baseduponthesedisciplinaryinfractions,bothinmatessubsequentlysignedguiltypleaagreements,waivingtheirrighttoadisciplinaryhearing.Theagreementprovidedthattheappellantswouldreceiveaspunishmentfivedayspunitivesegregation,sixmonthslossofvisitationandpackageprivileges,anddrugretestingwithinthreemonths.Subsequently,theappellantsfiledagrievanceactionseekingtovacatetheirguiltypleaagreements.TheDepartmentofCorrectionfoundthegrievances unacceptableforfurtherprocessing. ` OnOctober22,1998,theappellantsjointlyfiledtheinstantpetitionforwritofhabeascorpusrelief.Eachappellantallegesinhisrespectivepetition:8 ` Iacceptedtheagreementandsignedtheform....IwastoldtopackupandwasbroughttoMorganRegionalandplacedinpunitivesegregation.IthendiscoveredthatIhadlostmyjob,mysecurity,sixteendayssentencecreditsandmustserve5dayspunitivesegregation.TheformIhadsignedhasbeenalteredtoincludethe 926 punishmentIamtoreceive.ThispunishmentwasNOTontheform  whenIsignedit.` !` !  ` OnJanuary26,1999,theMorganCountyCriminalCourtdismissedthe   petitionwithoutholdinganevidentiaryhearing,findingthat [t]hesecomplaintsdo   notattackthevalidityoftheunderlyingjudgmentsagainsthimnordotheyinany  wayrendersamevoid,nordotheyraiseissueswhichinanywayclaimorshowan h`  expirationof[their]sentences.Theappellantsnowappealfromthisdismissal. H@  @* Analysis    ` Inthepresentcase,theappellantsmaynotattackbywayofapetitionforwrit  ofhabeascorpusthedisciplinaryactionoftheDepartmentofCorrection.Thefacts,  asstatedinthepetition,cannotsupportacauseofactionunderthehabeascorpus h` provisionsofTennesseelaw.SeegenerallyTenn.CodeAnn.2921101etseq. H!@ (1980and1998Supp.).Oursupremecourthasheldthatthewritofhabeascorpus (#  willnotlietochallengethedenialofprisonprivilegesandrelatedinternalmatters, %  butisonlyavailablewhereaprisonerssentenceisvoidorhistermofimprisonment &" hasexpired.SeeHallv.Heer,217Tenn.392,398S.W.2d71(1966);Stateexrel. (!$ Jordanv.Bomar,217Tenn.494,398S.W.2d724(1965).Thereisnoindication *#& thattheappellantsrespectiveconvictionsarevoidorthattheirsentenceof ,%( imprisonmenthasexpired.Archerv.State,851S.W.2d157,164(Tenn.1993).As h.`'* theappellantspresentnofactssupportinggroundsforhabeascorpusrelief,we H0@), concludethatthetrialcourtssummarydismissalofthepetitionwasproper. (2 +.  ` Additionally,althoughitistruethathabeascorpuspetitionsmaybetreated 5.2 aspetitionsforpostconvictionrelief,seeTenn.CodeAnn.4030205(c)(1997), 704 theappellantscomplaintinthecasesubjudicecannotberesolvedinapost 926 convictionproceeding.ReliefunderthePostConvictionProcedureActisavailable  onlytochallengeaconvictionorsentenceofacourtofthisstate.SeeTenn.Code  Ann.4030202(a)(1997).Theactioninthepresentcasewastheresultofa   disciplinaryproceedingbytheDepartmentofCorrection,whichisanagencyofthe   executivebranchofgovernment.   ` Itiswellestablishedthatprisondisciplinaryproceedingsmayonlybe H@  reviewedbythecourtsthroughacommonlawwritofcertiorarifiledinDavidson (  County.  #  1      ׀SeeBishopv.Conley,894S.W.2d294,296(Tenn.Crim.App.1994)  (citingTenn.CodeAnn.278101,102(1980)).Thewritmustbefiledwithin60  daysfromthefinaldecisionofthereviewingboardorcommission.Tenn.CodeAnn.  279102.Fromtherecordbeforeus,itappearsthatthelastactiononthismatter  occurredonSeptember18,1998.Thus,theappellantspetitionforwritofhabeas  corpuswasfiledwithinthe60dayperiod.Notwithstanding,thiscourthasno h` authority,statutoryorotherwise,totransfertheappellantscaseacrossjurisdictional H!@ boundaries.SeeBishopv.Conley,894S.W.2dat296.Noristhereanyauthority (#  permittingthiscourttoconvertthehabeascorpuspetitionintoapetitionforwritof %  certiorari.Id. &"  `  ` Forthereasonsdiscussedherein,theappellantsjointpetitionforwritof *#& habeascorpusreliefisdismissed. ,%(   H0@), #XXXX]#XXXX0 ` 0 ` T$` T$0 T$ T$0hT$T$0hT$hT$____________________________________ T$T$  `     h   DAVIDG.HAYES,Judge   CONCUR: &  _________________________________________  GARYR.WADE,PresidingJudge  _________________________________________ <4 DAVIDH.WELLES,Judge " #XXXX(#XXXX#XXXXD+#