ÿWPCF …# VUNa %¯ 0(µ4Ýñ w@ 0J@ 0TŠ 0^Þ 0h< 0r¤ 0| 0†’ 0 1u¨ U, 0dI U,­ U>Ù B)DC@ AMƒU*Ðúf B|v~™vÓ D3ê 0@ AO]Ƭ 0Dr 0D¶ D/ú B)˜HP LaserJet 4Si/4SiMX PS 600dpiPSCRIPTÀÌÀääÀÀÌ0†(ÈhH  Z ‹6Times New Roman RegularX($¡¡¨VU 3|xd [î\E]D^D_D`DabPcDdD2 ÿÿ0Indent1Ô2ÔÔ3  Ô2" ÿÿ0Indent2à0 àÔ2ÔÔ3  Ô2, ÿÿ0Indent3à0 àà0 àÔ2ÔÔ3  Ô26 ÿÿ0Indent4à0 àà0 àà0 àÔ2ÔÔ3  Ô2@ ÿÿ0Indent5à0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àÔ2ÔÔ3  Ô2J ÿÿ0Indent6à0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àÔ2ÔÔ3  Ô2T ÿÿ0Indent7à0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àÔ2ÔÔ3  Ô2^ ÿÿ0Indent8à0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àÔ2ÔÔ3  Ô  ÿÿ?AGMSYaioIndent0I.A.1.a.(1)(a)i)a)< Œ 9p`(ModernP ÿÿ8Mac DefaultMac DefaultÓ ` °šXÓ< Œ 9p`(Monaco< Œ 9p`(&Times New Roman% Line 7 d7Border 1dd€- Cþÿ << Gÿÿ< Œ 9p`(Arial Ý ƒ!ÝÔ€ÔÔ€ÔÝ  ÝÝ ƒ"ÝÝ  ÝÔ€"ÔÔ€"ÔÓ  ÓÔ YYY ÔFILEDÔ€"XÔÌÌò òFebruary€29,€1996ÌÌCecil€Crowson,€Jr.ÌÔ€"ôÔAppellate€Court€Clerkó ó \Ñ\R AØ'\Ñ dPtPtHHÚ(ÿáÿâùFG(üHHÚ(d'@Styl{WP}01•ÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃà Ãà Ãà Ãà Ãà ÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÐ ÐÐHHÐÐ  ÐÐ2ÐÐÿÿ¸æ$ÿÐÐHHÐÐÐÐÐÐÐÐ  ÐÐ ÐÐ ÐÑÑÑGenevaÑÑ ÑÑ € ÑÑ<Px–ÈÑÒÒÒ443!#4ÒÒ$ *$ÒÒ$*$ÒÒ ÿKK ÒÒ  Geneva ÒÒ  Geneva ÒÓ.,ÓÓÓÓ6ÓÓ ÓßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßÑMonacoÑÑ ÑÒ  BA: T Monaco ÒÒ  BA: T Monaco Ò%%%%'ÿÿdxd("ÿÿ$££Ò  ÒÒ  Ò€-‚ƒCþÿ<< CÿÿƒLevel 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5(3¯$¢¢Ý ƒ!ÝÝ  Ý($$””ò òÚ  Ú2Ú  Úó ó„„'÷ÿ dxdüÿP PdÝ ƒ!ÝÔ . ÔÔ€ÔÓ&€X„d&ÓÑ#€Xd#ÑÔ€ÔÝ  ÝÒ  ÒÒ X ÒÓ  ÓÑ\R AØ'\Ñò òIN€THE€COURT€OF€CRIMINAL€APPEALS€OFÏTENNESSEEÌÙ€€ÙßL€!# ;+'h|ðþ ` Å `€€LßÌAT€JACKSONÌÌJUNE€1995€SESSIONÌÌÌÌÌÌÓ  ÓFRED€RANEY,€WARDEN,ó óà à€à à)€€C.C.A.€NO.€02C01„9501„CC„00021Ìò òSTATE€OF€TENNESSEE,ó óà àà àà à)à àà àà à€€€€Ìà àAppellee,à àà àà àà à)€€Lauderdale€County€Circuit€No.€4456Ìà àà àà àà àà àà à)€€Ìò òV.ó óà àà àà àà àà àà à)€€Hon.€Joe€H.€Walker,€IIIÌà àà àà àà àà àà à)Ìò òBILLY€MCGHEE,ó óà àà àà àà à)€€(Habeas€Corpus)Ìà àAppellant.à àà àà àà à)Ìà àà àà àà àà àà à)ÌÌFOR€THE€APPELLANT:à àà àà àà àFOR€THE€APPELLEE:ÌÌBilly€McGhee,€Pro€Seà àà àà àà àCharles€W.€BursonÌT.D.O.C.€NO.€109355à àà àà àà àAttorney€General€&€ReporterÌCold€Creek€Correctional€Facilityà àà àà àÌP.O.€Box€1000ÌHenning,€TN€38041„1000à àà àà àà àEugene€J.€HoneaÌà àà àà àà àà àà àà àAssistant€Attorney€GeneralÌà àà àà àà àà àà àà à450€James€Robertson€ParkwayÌà àà àà àà àà àà àà àNashville,€TN€37243„0493ÌÌà àà àà àà àà àà àà àÌÌOPINION€FILED:€€òò€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€óóÌÌÌò òAFFIRMEDÌÌÌMARY€BETH€LEIBOWITZ,ó óÌSpecial€JudgeÌÇÓ  Óò òO€P€I€N€I€O€Nó óÌÌÌÓ  ÓÓÓà àThis€is€an€appeal€as€of€right€by€the€Pro€Se€Appellant,€Billy€McGhee,€from€the€judgment€ofÏthe€Lauderdale€County€Circuit€Court,€denying€his€Petition€for€Writ€of€Habeas€Corpus.€€TheÏAppellant€contends€in€his€single€issue€that€he€stated€a€cognizable€constitutional€claim€pursuant€toÏthe€habeas€corpus€statute€and€that€the€court€erred€in€transforming€the€writ€of€habeas€corpus€into€aÏpetition€for€post„conviction€relief€and€dismissing€it€as€time€barred.Ìà àIn€March€1984,€the€Defendant€was€indicted€by€the€Shelby€County€Grand€Jury€in€eight€(8)€Ïcounts€charging€the€Defendant€with€aggravated€rape.€€The€Defendant€pled€guilty€as€charged€andÏwas€sentenced€to€twenty€(20)€years€imprisonment€on€each€of€the€indictments€on€January€28,€1986.€ÏOn€March€22,€1985,€the€Shelby€County€Grand€Jury€returned€four€(4)€additional€indictmentsÏcharging€the€Defendant€with€aggravated€rape.€€As€to€these€charges€the€Defendant€went€to€trial€andÏwas€convicted€of€aggravated€rape€and€sentenced€to€forty€(40)€years€on€each€€indictment€onÏDecember€10,€1985.€€Following€the€jury€trial€an€appeal€ensued€and€the€cases€were€reversed€andÏremanded.€€The€Defendant€was€subsequently€re„indicted€€and€pled€guilty€to€aggravated€sexualÏbattery€in€1988.€€The€Defendant€has€thereafter€filed€twelve€(12)€petitions€for€writ€of€habeas€corpusÏalleging€that€the€indictments€in€the€cases€on€which€he€originally€pled€guilty€and€the€four€(4)€casesÏon€which€he€was€subsequently€found€guilty€of€aggravated€sexual€battery€were€constitutionallyÏvoid.€€He€cites€the€same€reasons€that€the€Supreme€Court€found€to€hold€that€the€indictments€wereÏvoid€on€appeal€of€the€first€four€trials.€€The€Defendant€urges€that€he€is€entitled€to€appointment€ofÏcounsel€and€to€an€evidentiary€hearing€on€his€petition.€€He€further€submits€that€it€was€error€to€treatÏthe€writ€of€habeas€corpus€as€a€post„conviction€petition.Ìà àThe€State€asserts€that€the€Defendant€has€not€asserted€the€necessary€claims€for€habeas€corpusÏrelief.Ìà àWe€agree€with€the€State€and€affirm€the€convictions.Ìà àAlthough€the€Defendant€asserts€that€the€indictments€were€improperly€charged€and€incorrect,Ïhe€did€not€put€forth€a€claim€that€his€convictions€are€void€within€the€meaning€of€Tenn.€Code€Ann.Ï29„21„101€et€seq.€€Pursuant€to€that€statute€a€conviction€must€be€void€upon€its€face,€not€merelyÍvoidable,€and€the€Defendant's€term€of€imprisonment€would€have€to€have€expired.€€Neither€of€theseÏclaims€are€made€by€the€Defendant.€€In€òòPasserella€v.€Stateóó,€Davidson€County,€C.C.A.€No.€01C01„9402„CR„00035,€(July€28,€1994),€this€Court€has€clearly€set€out€the€circumstances€of€habeasÏcorpus€relief€and€what€constitutes€a€void€judgment.ÌÒ ¸ ÒÒ  ÒÓÓà àIt€is€a€well„established€principle€of€law€that€the€remedy€ofÏhabeas€corpus€is€limited€in€scope€as€well€as€relief.€€In€criminal€cases,Ïthe€remedy€is€limited€to€cases€where€the€judgment€is€void€or€the€termÏof€imprisonment€has€expired........ÌÌIf€the€court€rendering€a€judgment€has€jurisdiction€of€the€person,€theÏsubject„matter,€and€has€the€authority€to€make€the€challengedÏjudgment,€the€judgment€is€voidable,€not€void;€and€the€judgment€mayÏnot€be€collaterally€attacked€in€a€suit€for€habeas€corpus€relief.ÌÌÒ  ÒÒ X ÒÓÓà àThus€the€writ€of€habeas€corpus€is€not€available€under€these€circumstances€and€the€courtÏproperly€reviewed€the€petition€as€a€post„conviction€petition€attacking€allegedly€unconstitutionalÏgrounds.€€The€writ€of€habeas€corpus€is€only€available€when€the€prisoner's€sentence€is€void€or€hisÏterm€of€imprisonment€has€expired.€€òòState€v.€Warrenóó,€740€S.W.2nd€427,€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.€1986).€ÏA€writ€of€habeas€corpus€may€not€be€used€to€make€a€collateral€attack€against€a€valid€judgment€andÏconviction.€€òòState€ex€rel.€Smith€v.€Bomaróó,€368€S.W.2nd€748,€(Tenn.€1963).€€In€òòState€ex€rel.WoodÏv.€Johnsonóó,€393€S.W.2nd€135,€(1965),€the€Defendant€averred€that€he€was€coerced€into€pleadingÏguilty,€and€this€constituted€a€collateral€attack€upon€a€valid€judgment€of€a€court€of€generalÏjurisdiction€which€could€not€be€made€by€petition€for€habeas€corpus.€€€Further€òòState€ex€rel.€CarrollÏv.€Hendersonóó,€443€S.W.2nd€€689,€(1969),€€says€that€a€Petition€for€habeas€corpus€may€not€be€usedÏto€review€or€correct€errors€of€law€or€fact€committed€by€the€court€in€the€exercise€of€its€jurisdiction,Ïand€the€writ€cannot€be€used€as€a€substitute€for€or€to€serve€the€purpose€of€appeal€or€writ€of€error€orÏto€obtain€a€rehearing€in€the€appellate€court.Ìà àThus€the€Defendant€has€not€stated€a€ground€for€habeas€corpus€relief,€and€has€also€failed€toÏshow€that€he€is€entitled€to€relief€under€the€Post„Conviction€Act.€The€issue€is€therefore€without€meritÏand€the€judgment€of€the€trial€court€is€affirmed.€Ñ€$ÑÇ€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€Ï___________________________________à àà àà àà àà àà àà àMARYÏBETH€LEIBOWITZ,€SPECIAL€JUDGEÌà àà àà àà àà àà àÌÌÌÌCONCUR:ÌÌ____________________________________ÌPAUL€G.€SUMMERS,€JUDGEÌÌ____________________________________ÌWILLIAM€M.€BARKER,€JUDGE