ÿWPCÿ 6`#Us¡üêïÂ&ižK gèòºà¶÷EÚüTì)‡Ð“4»o³"øñÀÕÁ2x]Y_;Žù÷تÒò»ç"ݤýÏ—µ‡ïßgÁ ®ë9J¿eÁÜü»œ³[, %-@xDždX Í~¦¢X[ؼͥªŠª wÝ…{µDˆ ½øTŽ‹®Ô3;4çe”‚& ƒùRynÎŵÞ.†·@dËÒE©09©BïÖÝJ´§¯é±]nqÕŒ³¹Q"y¼<" ÂEÌeW†É#'h† r?¹ØÂˇJèû\½ 18Šv%—Ž?“œµŒïHÓŽ¸_¢þ«uá¿[¤ý­ßmÔsöI§¬þ´Ò‹¤©ß¿VVÔ —Ò75Eoƒ… 4£ô2âw¡ìíÐ&ŽÁïÁÀüIØ.´#{Æ{Õ4G· @Îý÷‡U«v#O¢|ùíáûüß×¢¦``Å¿‰âNIýRc±«¯“BóÂÑÀ6)0Š<›=d*úi€R8kbÏÉÓ¿×'Šˆ_:SÙÏQ/¤›ýîpu™IMÁ¿‡@Æ>¬)ñ“ûÅj¤((Á®JoA³^ø¹þËßÏ Êkê°{px·>î°¯O^ì Î|·ú'ÃwÕöä$€…# F UNQ %Ÿ 0(¥ U:Í w@ 4G [ U>j 0ˆ¨ 0D0 )t U: ×fäU:J„U:ŒŒŒŒŒŒŒŒŒŒŒŒŒ BÆÆÆÆÆÆÆÆÆÆÆ D3ããã 0D AOZÆ©© 0Do D/³ Bâ˜HP LaserJet 4Si/4SiMX PS 600dpiPSCRIPTÀÌÀääÀÀÌ0 (c ¬ Z ‹6Times New Roman RegularX($¡¡,c½¬AZ‹"Arial Regular 2E34E5L6D7E89U:D;Ó€©U!3|xF<@ˆÐ9Z &Courier Regular(8(2¨$¤¤Ý ƒ!ÝÝ  ÝÒ4°ÒÒX°Òà Œ àòòÚ  Ú0Ú  Úóó(#Ã$òòÚ  Ú0Ú  Úóó Ý ƒ ¨$ÝÒ4°ÒÒX°Òà Œ àòòÚ  Ú1Ú  ÚóóÝ  ÝÔ‡òPPòXXÔÔ‡òÇSòòòPPÔThe€first€four€criteria€are€found€in€òòGrayóó.€€A€fifth€category€in€òòGrayóó,€based€on€a€specific€number€ofÐ `  Ðprior€felony€convictions,€may€enhance€the€sentence€range€but€is€no€longer€a€listed€criterion.€€òòSeeóó€Tenn.Ð  À ÐCode€Ann.€ðð€40„35„115,€Sentencing€Commission€Comments.Ô#†òPPòòòÇS~#ÔÔ‡ òxòòòPPÔ,c½¬AZ‹"Arial Regular Ô€X½XXXÔÔ€8{XX½ÔÓ  ÓÔ Ad ÔFILEDÔ€X½X8{ÔÐ  ÐÌò òOctober€30,€1996Ð šš ÐÌCecil€Crowson,€Jr.ÌÔ€ôwÖôXX½ÔAppellate€Court€Clerkó ó \Ñ\R AØ'ÿ Legal\Ñ,c½¬AZ‹"Arial Regular-kû¤AZ‹"Arial Regular d'ÿÿdxd(3¯$££Ý ƒ!ÝÝ  Ý€-‚ƒCþÿ<< CÿÿƒLevel 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5($$””ò òÚ  Ú1Ú  Úó ó„„'÷ÿ dxdüÿP PdÝ ƒ!ÝÝ  Ýñ;ñ›ñ;ñÒ4°ÒÒX°ÒÑ` °ÑÑܰÑÓ  ÓÔ€X½XXXÔÓÓÑTR[¤ AØ'ÿ Legal3Ø' AØ'ÿ Legalÿ3Ø'TÑñ;ñßr€*<,(j 8` `€€@E$a ` ttx$\` ð Õrß›ñ;ñà@@g g ÚàòòIN€THE€COURT€OF€CRIMINAL€APPEALS€OF€TENNESSEEóóÐ `  Ðà@@ôô*ÚàòòAT€KNOXVILLE€óóÐ , Ì Ðà@@ÿÿ(ÚàJUNE€1996€SESSIONÌÌÓ  ÓSTATE€OF€TENNESSEE,à ” àà ì à*à D àC.C.A.€#€03C01„9510„CC„00320€Ð 0 Ðà Œ àAppellee,à < àà ” àà ì à*à D àBLOUNT€COUNTYÐ \ü  ÐVS.à Œ àà ä àà < àà ” àà ì à*à D àHon.€D.€Kelly€Thomas,€Jr.,€JudgeÐ (È  ÐRICKY€LYNN€MOORE,à ” àà ì à*à D à(Sentencing)Ð ô”  Ðà Œ àAppellant.à < àà ” àà ì à*Ð À` ÐÌòòÌÌFor€Appellant:óóà < àà ” àà ì àà D àòòFor€Appellee:óóÐ ð ÐÓÓMack€Garnerà < àà ” àà ì àà D àCharles€W.€BursonÐ ¼ \ ÐDistrict€Public€Defenderà ” àà ì àà D àAttorney€General€&€ReporterÐ ¢!B Ð419€High€StreetÌMaryville,€TN€€37804à ” àà ì àà D àElizabeth€T.€RyanÐ n# Ðà Œ àà ä àà < àà ” àà ì àà D àAssistant€Attorney€GeneralÌà Œ àà ä àà < àà ” àà ì àà D à450€James€Robertson€ParkwayÌà Œ àà ä àà < àà ” àà ì àà D àNashville,€TN€€37243„0493à ü! àà T$ àÐ  &À  Ðà Œ àÌœñ:ñà Œ à›à Œ à›à Œ à›à Œ à›Ìñ:ñ›à Œ àà ä àà < àà ” àà ì àà D àMike€FlynnÌà Œ àà ä àà < àà ” àà ì àà D àDistrict€Attorney€GeneralÌà Œ àà ä àà < àà ” àà ì àà D à363€Court€StreetÌà Œ àà ä àà < àà ” àà ì àà D àMaryville,€TN€€37801Ìà Œ àà ä àà < àà ” àà ì àà D àà œ àÌÌÌÌOPINION€FILED:__________________ÌÌÌÌÌAFFIRMEDÌÌÌÌÌGARY€R.€WADE€ò òòòÐ  8¸.4 ÐÒ°4&ÒÒ°X4ÒÒ4°ÒÒX°ÒÓ  ÓÑ7€ŽÉXXdìXXdì7ÑÓÓÑ€†ÑOPINIONÐ `  ÐÓç Óà Œ àà ä àó óóóThe€defendant,€Ricky€Lynn€Moore,€pled€guilty€to€one€count€of€burglaryÐ 8 Ø Ðand€one€count€of€theft€over€$1000.€€At€the€time€of€these€offenses,€the€defendant€wasÏon€intensive€probation€for€a€1992€aggravated€robbery€conviction.€€The€pleaÏagreement€provided€for€Range€I,€concurrent€two„year€sentences€on€each€count€andÏrestitution€in€the€amount€of€$6550.€€After€revoking€probation€and€ordering€theÏdefendant€to€serve€his€eight„year€robbery€sentence,€the€trial€court€ordered€theÏburglary€and€theft€sentences€to€be€served€consecutively€to€the€eight„year€robberyÏsentence.€€The€single€issue€on€appeal€is€whether€the€trial€court€erred€by€ordering€theÏsentences€to€be€served€consecutively.€€We€affirm€the€trial€court.ÌÌà Œ àà ä àThe€defendant,€an€employee€of€Pizza€Hut,€became€angry€when€heÏwas€denied€a€transfer€to€another€location.€€After€closing,€he€used€his€keys€to€enterÏthe€restaurant,€open€its€safe,€and€remove€approximately€$6500.€€He€claimedÌthat€he€used€the€money€to€pay€delinquent€child€support€and€other€overdue€bills.€€TheÏrecord€establishes€that€the€defendant€had€prior€convictions€for€passing€worthlessÏchecks,€assault,€impersonating€a€police€officer,€possession€of€a€weapon€with€theÏintent€to€go€armed,€and€various€driving€related€offenses.€€He€faced€a€charge€forÏdriving€on€a€revoked€license€at€the€time€of€the€sentencing€hearing.€€ÌÌà Œ àà ä àThe€trial€court€found€consecutive€sentencing€appropriate€because€theÏdefendant€had€an€extensive€record€of€criminal€activity€and€because€the€offensesÏwere€committed€while€the€defendant€was€on€probation.€€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€40„35„¼115.€€The€defendant€claims€the€trial€court€had€no€basis€for€ordering€the€newÏsentences€consecutive€to€the€eight„year€term€for€robbery.€ÌÌà Œ àà ä àÔ‡ X½XXX½ÔWhen€there€is€a€challenge€to€the€length,€range,€or€manner€of€service€ofÐ $8Ä.4 Ða€sentence,€it€is€the€duty€of€this€court€to€conduct€a€òòdeóó€òònovoóó€review€with€aÐ 8 Ø Ðpresumption€that€the€determinations€made€by€the€trial€court€are€correct.€€Tenn.€CodeÏAnn.€ðð€40„35„401(d).€€This€presumption€is€"conditioned€upon€the€affirmative€showingÏin€the€record€that€the€trial€court€considered€the€sentencing€principles€and€allÏrelevant€facts€and€circumstances."€€òòState€v.€Ashbyóó,€823€S.W.2d€166,€169€(Tenn.Ð ˜8  Ð1991);€òòseeóó€òòState€v.€Jonesóó,€883€S.W.2d€597€(Tenn.€1994).€€The€SentencingÐ p  ÐCommission€Comments€provide€that€the€burden€is€on€the€defendant€to€show€theÏimpropriety€of€the€sentence.€€ÌÌà Œ àà ä àOur€review€requires€an€analysis€of€(1)€the€evidence,€if€any,€received€atÏthe€trial€and€sentencing€hearing;€(2)€the€presentence€report;€(3)€the€principles€ofÏsentencing€and€the€arguments€of€counsel€relative€to€sentencing€alternatives;€(4)€theÏnature€and€characteristics€of€the€offense;€(5)€any€mitigating€or€enhancing€factors;€(6)Ïany€statements€made€by€the€defendant€in€his€own€behalf;€and€(7)€the€defendant'sÏpotential€for€rehabilitation€or€treatment.€€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðððð€€40„35„102,€„103,€ñ9ñÌñ9ñandñ5ññ5ññ7ññ5ñ„ñ5ññ7ññ8ñ„ñ8ññ5ñ21ñ5ññ6ñ€ñ6ññ2ñ„ñ1ñ„ñ1ññ2ññ4ññ3ñ„ñ3ññ4ññ6ñ21ñ6ñ0;€òòState€v.€Smithóó,€735€S.W.2d€859,€863€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.€1987).Ð à&€  ÐÌà Œ àà ä àThere€are€three€separate€statutory€provisions€or€rules€which€areÏrelevant€to€the€defendantððs€receiving€consecutive€sentences.€€First,€there€is€Tenn.ÏCode€Ann.€ðð€40„35„115,€which€is€essentially€a€codification€of€òòGray€v.€Stateóó,€538Ð @.à$( ÐS.W.2d€391€(Tenn.€1976)€and€òòState€v.€Tayloróó,€739€S.W.2d€227€(Tenn.€1987).€€ThatÐ 0¸&* Ðsection€creates€several€limited€classifications€for€the€imposition€of€consecutiveÏsentences.€€Next,€there€is€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€40„35„310,€which€gives€the€trial€judgeÏdiscretion€to€order€consecutive€sentences€when€the€defendant€commits€a€crimeÏwhile€on€probation.€€Finally,€there€is€Rule€32,€Tenn.€R.€Crim.€P.,€which€addressesÐ x7.2 Ðsentencing€where€the€defendant€has€prior€unserved€sentences€and€also€requiresÏmandatory€consecutive€sentencing€in€limited€instances.€€The€mere€fact€that€theÏdefendant€may€escape€consecutive€sentencing€under€one€rule€or€statute€does€notÏbar€consecutive€sentencing€based€on€another€statute.€€We€will€consider€each€of€theÏprovisions.€€€€à < àà ” àÐ À` ÐÌà Œ àà ä àPrior€to€the€enactment€of€the€Criminal€Sentencing€Reform€Act€of€1989,Ïthe€limited€classifications€for€the€imposition€of€consecutive€sentences€were€set€out€inÏòòGray€v.€Stateóó,€538€S.W.2d€391,€393€(Tenn.€1976).€€In€that€case€our€supreme€courtÐ  À Ðruled€that€aggravating€circumstances€must€be€present€before€placement€in€any€oneÏof€the€classifications.€€Later,€in€òòState€v.€Tayloróó,€739€S.W.2d€227€(Tenn.€1987),€theÐ Ðp Ðcourt€established€an€additional€category€for€those€defendants€convicted€of€two€orÏmore€statutory€offenses€involving€sexual€abuse€of€minors.€€There€were,€however,Ïadditional€words€of€caution:€€"[C]onsecutive€sentences€should€not€routinely€beÏimposed€.€.€.€and€.€.€.€the€aggregate€maximum€of€consecutive€terms€must€beÏreasonably€related€to€the€severity€of€the€offenses€involved."€€òòState€v.€Tayloróó,€739Ð %¨ ÐS.W.2d€at€230.€€The€Sentencing€Commission€Comments€adopted€the€cautionaryÏlanguage.€€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€40„35„115.€€The€1989€Act€is,€in€essence,€theÏcodification€of€the€holdings€in€òòGrayóó€and€òòTayloróó;€consecutive€sentences€may€beÐ *0!$ Ðimposed€in€the€discretion€of€the€trial€court€only€upon€a€determination€that€one€orÏmore€of€the€following€criteria׃ ×Ý ƒ #ÃÝòòÚ  Ú1Ú  ÚóóÝ  Ý×  ×€exist:Ð @.à$( ÐÓÓà8 Œ àà8ä Œ (#Œ (#à(1)€The€defendant€is€a€professional€criminal€who€hasÏknowingly€devoted€himself€to€criminal€acts€as€a€majorÏsource€of€livelihood;Ð ä Ð ä Ð  ÐÌà8 Œ àà8ä Œ (#Œ (#à(2)€€The€defendant€is€an€offender€whose€record€ofÏcriminal€activity€is€extensive;д4T+/ä Ð ä Ð  Їà8 Œ àà8ä Œ (#Œ (#à(3)€The€defendant€is€a€dangerous€mentally€abnormalÏperson€so€declared€by€a€competent€psychiatrist€whoÏconcludes€as€a€result€of€an€investigation€prior€toÏsentencing€that€the€defendant's€criminal€conduct€hasÏbeen€characterized€by€a€pattern€of€repetitive€orÏcompulsive€behavior€with€heedless€indifference€toÏconsequences;Ð ä Ð ä Ð  ÐÌà8 Œ àà8ä Œ (#Œ (#à(4)€The€defendant€is€a€dangerous€offender€whoseÏbehavior€indicates€little€or€no€regard€for€human€life,€andÏno€hesitation€about€committing€a€crime€in€which€the€riskÏto€human€life€is€high;€€€€à D à€€€€Ð„$ ä Ð ä Ð  ÐÌà8 Œ àà8ä Œ (#Œ (#à(5)€€The€defendant€is€convicted€of€two€(2)€or€moreÏstatutory€offenses€involving€sexual€abuse€of€a€minor€withÏconsideration€of€the€aggravating€circumstances€arisingÏfrom€the€relationship€between€the€defendant€and€victimÏor€victims,€the€time€span€of€defendant's€undetectedÏsexual€activity,€the€nature€and€scope€of€the€sexual€actsÏand€the€extent€of€the€residual,€physical€and€mentalÏdamage€to€the€victim€or€victims;Ð ä Ð ä Ð  ÐÌà8 Œ àà8ä Œ (#Œ (#à(6)€€The€defendant€is€sentenced€for€an€offenseÏcommitted€while€on€probation;Ð ä Ð ä Ð  ÐÌà8 Œ àà8ä Œ (#Œ (#à(7)€€The€defendant€is€sentenced€for€criminal€contempt.Ð ä Ð ä Ð  ÐÌÓë&ÓTenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€40„35„115(b).ÌÌà Œ àà ä àÔ#†XŸXX XŸÂ#ÔThe€defendant€contends€that€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€40„35„115€onlyÐ ô%” Ðapplies€to€multiple€convictions€arising€out€of€one€proceeding€and€is€not€a€basis€forÏordering€new€sentences€be€served€consecutively€to€prior€unserved€sentences.€€HeÏreasons€that€the€new€sentences€should€not€have€been€ordered€consecutive€to€theÏeight€year€term.€€We€disagree.€€The€plain€language€of€the€statute€does€not€limit€itsÏapplication:€€ð ðIf€a€defendant€is€convicted€of€more€than€one€(1)€criminal€offense,€theÏcourt€shall€order€sentences€to€run€consecutively€or€concurrently€as€provided€by€theÏcriteria€in€this€section.ðð€€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€40„35„115(a).€€Our€interpretation€is€thatÏconsecutive€sentences€may€be€imposed€any€time€the€defendant€is€convicted€of€moreÏthan€one€criminal€offense;€the€offenses€do€not€necessarily€have€to€arise€from€theÏsame€proceeding.€€Also,€subpart€(b)(6)€is€a€basis€for€consecutive€sentences€whenÐ d8/3 Ðð ð[t]he€defendant€is€sentenced€for€òòanóó€offense€committed€while€on€probation[.]ðð€Tenn.Ð `  ÐCode€Ann.€ðð€40„35„115(b)(6)€(emphasis€added).€€ð ðAn€offenseðð€is€singular€andÏauthorizes€the€trial€judge€to€order€the€new€sentence€to€be€served€consecutively€toÏthe€one€for€which€probation€was€granted.€€This€court€has€previously€held€that€thisÏsection€applies€where€the€trial€court€sentences€the€defendant€for€an€offenseÏcommitted€while€on€probation.€€òòState€v.€James€W.€Tayloróó,€No.€01C01„9501„CC„Ð ˜8  Ð0002,€slip€op.€at€7€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.,€at€Nashville,€June€22,€1995).€€òòSee€alsoóó€òòKennyÐ p  ÐDeWayne€Covington€v.€Stateóó,€No.€01C01„9401„CR„00010€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.,€atÐ Hè  ÐNashville,€Oct.€6,€1994),€òòperm.€to€app.€den.óó€(Tenn.€1995);€òòState€v.€Henry€Appleóó,€No.Ð  À Ð01C01„9209„CR„00273€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.,€at€Nashville,€Feb.€18,€1993).Ô‡ XŸXXXŸÔÐ ø˜ ÐÌà Œ àà ä àThe€second€statutory€basis€for€consecutive€sentencing€is€Tenn.€CodeÏAnn.€ðð€40„35„310,€which€provides€as€follows:ÌÒ°X ÒÒ°ÒÒ°4ó ÒÒä °ÒÓÓ[I]n€any€case€of€revocation€of€suspension€[of€probation]Ïon€account€of€conduct€by€the€defendant€which€hasÏresulted€in€a€judgment€of€conviction€against€him€duringÏhis€period€of€probation,€the€trial€judge€may€order€that€theÏterm€of€imprisonment€imposed€by€the€original€judgmentÏbe€served€consecutively€to€any€sentence€which€wasÏimposed€upon€such€conviction.Ì€€ÌÒ°ä V6ÒÒ°66ÒÓd6ÓÒ4 °ÒÒX °ÒThe€section€gives€the€trial€judge€discretion€to€order€consecutive€sentences€when€theÏdefendant€is€convicted€of€a€crime€while€on€probation€for€a€previous€crime.ÌÌà Œ àà ä àThe€third€and€final€rule,€Rule€32(c),€Tenn.€R.€Crim.€P.,€addressesÏsentencing€when€the€defendant€has€prior€unserved€sentences:ÌÒ°X)8ÒÒ°ÒÒ°48ÒÒä °ÒÓÓò ò(c)€Concurrent€or€Consecutive€Sentences.Ð ð1(, Ðó óÌÓ  Ó***ÌÓ :ÓÌ(2)€Sentence€When€Defendant€Has€Prior€Sentence€NotÏFully€Served.€€òòIf€the€defendant€has€additional€sentencesÐ ”64-1 Ðnot€yet€fully€servedóó€...€the€court€shall€recite€this€in€theÐ €7 .2 Ðjudgment€setting€sentence,€and€òòthe€sentence€imposedÐ l8 /3 Ðshall€be€deemed€to€be€concurrent€with€the€prior€sentenceóóÐ `  Ðor€sentences,€unless€it€affirmatively€appears€that€the€newÏsentence€being€imposed€is€to€be€served€consecutivelyÏwith€the€prior€sentence€or€sentences.€€òòThe€judgment€toÐ $ Ä Ðmake€the€sentences€consecutive€or€concurrent€shallÏexplicitly€recite€the€judgeððs€reasons€therefore,€and€isÏreviewable€on€appealóó.Ð èˆ ÐÌÓ  Ó***ÌÓõ<ÓÌ(3)€Mandatory€Consecutive€Sentences.€€Where€aÏdefendant€is€convicted€of€multiple€offenses€from€one€trialÏor€where€the€defendant€has€additional€sentences€not€yetÏfully€served€as€the€result€of€the€convictions€in€the€sameÏor€other€court€and€the€law€requires€consecutiveÏsentences,€òòthe€sentence€shall€be€consecutive€whetherÐ 4Ô  Ðthe€judgment€explicitly€so€orders€or€notóó.€€This€rule€shallÐ  À Ðapply:Ìà < àÌà < à(A)€to€a€sentence€for€a€felony€committed€while€òòonÐ ä„ Ðparoleóó€for€a€felony;Ð Ðp Ðà < àÌà < à(B)€to€a€sentence€for€escape€or€for€a€felonyÏcommitted€while€on€escape;Ìà < àÌà < à(C)€to€a€sentence€for€a€felony€where€the€defendantÏwas€released€on€bail€and€the€defendant€is€convicted€ofÏboth€offenses;€andÌà < àÌà < à(D)€any€other€ground€provided€by€law.ÌÌÒ°ä ¥9ÒÒ°…9ÒÓ³9ÓÒ468°ÒÒXH8°ÒTenn.€R.€Crim.€P.€32(c)(2)„(3)€(emphasis€added).ÌÌà Œ àà ä àThe€defendant€argues€that€he€does€not€fit€into€any€of€these€categories,Ïand€that€€consecutive€sentencing€is,€therefore,€inappropriate.€€As€indicated,Ïhowever,€Rule€32(c)(3)€is€not€the€only€statutory€provision€which€authorizes€the€trialÏcourt€to€impose€consecutive€sentences.€€Moreover,€Rule€32(c)(3)(D)€specificallyÏpermits€consecutive€sentencing€based€on€ð ðany€other€ground€provided€by€law.ðð€€€€ÌÌà Œ àà ä àIn€our€view,€the€defendant€still€is€subject€to€consecutive€sentencingÏunder€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€40„35„310€and€under€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€40„35„115.€ÏRecently,€in€òòState€v.€Wilkersonóó,€905€S.W.2d€933,€938€(Tenn.€1995),€our€high€courtÐ d8/3 ÐцÑÑTR[¤ AØ'ÿ Legal[¤ AØ'ÿ Legal AØ'ÿ Legal AØ'ÿ LegalTÑÑ  Ññ9ñцÑÑTR[¤ AØ'ÿ Legal[¤ AØ'ÿ Legal AØ'ÿ Legal AØ'ÿ LegalTÑÑ  Ññ9ñheld€that€consecutive€sentences€should€not€be€required€"unless€the€termsÐ `  Ðreasonably€relate[]€to€the€severity€of€the€offenses€committed€and€are€necessary€inÏorder€to€protect€the€public€(society)€from€further€criminal€acts€by€those€persons€whoÏresort€to€aggravated€criminal€conduct."€€The€òòWilkersonóó€decision,€which€modifiedÐ èˆ Ðsomewhat€the€strict€factual€guidelines€for€consecutive€sentencing€adopted€in€òòStateÐ À` Ðv.€Woodsóó,€814€S.W.2d€378,€380€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.€1991),€described€sentencing€asÐ ˜8  Ða€"human€process€that€neither€can€nor€should€be€reduced€to€a€set€of€fixed€andÏmechanical€rules."€€òòState€v.€Wilkersonóó,€905€S.W.2d€at€938.Ð Hè  ÐÌà Œ àà ä àHere,€the€trial€court€found€that€the€defendant€qualified€for€consecutiveÏsentences€on€two€grounds:€he€had€an€extensive€record€of€criminal€activity€and€theÏoffenses€were€committed€on€probation.€€The€record€supports€each€determination.ò òòòÐ ¨H ÐÒ°4Å@ÒÒ°X×@ÒÒ4°ÒÒX°ÒÔ#†XŸXX XŸc5#Ôó óóó€When€a€defendant€falls€within€the€statutory€classifications€for€eligibility€to€beÐ €  Ðconsidered€for€consecutive€sentencing,€the€only€remaining€considerations€areÏwhether€(1)€the€sentences€are€necessary€in€order€to€protect€the€public€from€furtherÏmisconduct€by€the€defendant€and€(2)€ð ðthe€terms€are€reasonably€related€to€theÏseverity€of€the€offenses.ðð€€òòState€v.€Wilkersonóó,€905€S.W.2d€at€938.Ð à&€  ÐÌà Œ àà ä àWe€hold€that€the€trial€court€had€a€basis€for€concluding€that€consecutiveÏsentences€are€necessary€to€protect€the€public.€€Because€these€crimes€wereÏcommitted€while€the€defendant€was€on€intensive€probation,€he€had€demonstrated€aÏlack€of€amenability€for€rehabilitation.€€That€he€chose€to€violate€a€position€of€trust€byÏburglarizing€the€business€of€his€employer€is€of€special€concern.€€At€a€relativelyÏyoung€age,€the€defendant€has€numerous€prior€convictions.€€ð ðFurther€misconductðð€byÏthe€defendant€appears€to€be€likely,€unless€the€defendant€is€incarcerated.€€Due€to€hisÏlengthy€record€and€his€failure€to€demonstrate€any€rehabilitative€qualities,€we€mustÐ x7.2 Ðalso€conclude€that€the€terms€are€reasonably€related€to€the€severity€of€the€offenses.€ÌÌà Œ àà ä àAccordingly,€the€judgment€is€affirmed.ÌÌÓÓà Œ àà ä àà < àà ” àà ì àà D à__________________________________Ìà Œ àà ä àà < àà ” àà ì àà D àGary€R.€Wade,€JudgeÌÌCONCUR:ÌÌÌÌ_______________________________ÌJoe€B.€Jones,€Presiding€JudgeÌÌÌÌ_________________________________ÌPaul€G.€Summers,€JudgeÌà Œ àà ä à