ÿWPC}  j\.Î9¢w†ˆ„Ô“Å‹k½sü^Wœÿ2xW«ÉÉ;b¶Dñަ» ZKpÇ ‹’0;–bƒé¬´pPz“­CößNCÀïY(Ádü|ÜmÙkd'*²~dÔo‰[!¨ßŒv4B |æÛtÃ;ÎH6t‚:«J“`öiD€Öƒ.goÛó}vËógÍz®ùŽ+áeð@7⛤咋†Í®ÈÚ¥ $D Âw¿ÄÖ ² >(‹‡8–ÝÚ©m²Ì 8«¯J&ƒõ¥ë¿If ?¥W=wÿŸ‚ª;©Št!Æ®%®!¤¯ï¬®(È/œš|¡M’Aå$9úºý)×[Š#(Wa¥Hè ºauS”Ð@ DK12Ù3èZXªSídA°/}p²ü˜]{á ~tr¯>Ål(ƒµ“‰¯Ç TÂE˜Œì,¸Kžœ®(¬Ë0ýíNH¤wIçX'‚Ø ÏN-"!9ÜÿïïÀ“ g˶F¾8£bˆå^Œ¡ç\‹;4«éPņ€ûIØœcãyˆy v=ˆÑöhÕ¬ÆÜ@ ’_Îýî`Îáh®Ç`ø?º|„(}˜’ðò.Ñ› RTµu´hËšpç¿_k'&õPÉE³ÿ±ð_}üI†7a#!NU:o %© 0(¯ 0³×wŠ 4Ž ¢ ± U:¹ -ó UN n U:p Nª ^ ¬ m¸ AQÏ 6 ÆV 0 Æ› 0Da 0D¥ 0Déé D3- B`˜HP LaserJet 8000 DN PSØÚØÚÚØØÚ0,c½¬AZ‹"Arial RegularX($¡¡(c(2 î$¤¤Ý ƒ!ÝÝ  ÝÒ°ÒÒX°ÒÔ€&®>%XXÔÓ  Óà ` àòòÚ  Ú0Ú  ÚóótpO''lXðô(3|x„†r‰AZ‹"Arial Regular #Ñ#€8ØXÿÿd#Ñ(ÈhH  Z 6Times New Roman Regular , øð AZ"Arial RegularS­M' ÿU‹ÿÀÀÀZ[\]_Cþÿ<<Cÿÿ ,Ý ƒ[¯"ÝÝ  ÝÔ€z XXÔÓ  ÓÔ_Ôò òÔ Ad ÔFILEDÔ€X*ÝXz ÔÐ  ÐÌOctober€13,€1999ÌÌCecil€Ô_ÔCrowsonÔ_Ô,€Jr.ÌAppellate€Court€Ô_ÔClerkÔdAYÔó óÔ_ÔI, II,Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5N1*â.I, II,Uppercase RomanÚƒXÚÚ  Ú.Û€XÛà0 àƒLevel 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5(3¯$¢¢Ý ƒ!ÝÝ  Ý(3¯$££Ý ƒ!ÝÝ  Ý($$””ò òÚ  Ú1Ú  Úó ó````'ÿÿdxd dÝ ƒ!ÝÝ  ÝÔ_ÔÒ°ÒÒX°ÒÑTR[° AØ'ÿ Legal3Ø' AØ'ÿ Legalÿ3Ø'TÑÓ  ÓÑ€ ûcÑÔ_Ôßv€_@0,j:úÿ`  `€€@ÿE±` 8ttxPR°ð  vßÔ_ÔÔ_ÔIN€THE€COURT€OF€CRIMINAL€APPEALS€OF€TENNESSEEÐ ° ÐÌAT€NASHVILLEÌÌJUNE€1999€SESSIONÌÌÌÌÌÓ  ÓSTATE€OF€TENNESSEE,à h àà À à)Ð Æ   Ðà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À à)à  àC.C.A.€No.€01C01„9807„CC„00320Ð ¬ ü  Ðà ` àAppellee,à  àà h àà À à)Ð ’â  Ðà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À à)à  àFranklin€CountyÐ xÈ  Ðv.à ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À à)Ð ^®  Ðà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À à)à  àHonorable€Buddy€D.€Perry,€JudgeÐ D”  ÐDELBERT€G.€MOSHER,à h àà À à)Ð *z  Ðà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À à)à  à(Attempt€to€Commit€Aggravated€Sexual€Battery)Ð ` Ðà ` àAppellant.à  àà h àà À à)Ð öF ÐÌÌÌÌÌòòFOR€THE€APPELLANTóó:à h àà À àà  àòòFOR€THE€APPELLEEóó:Ð Zª ÐÌPHILIP€A.€CONDRAà h àà À àà  àPAUL€G.€SUMMERSÐ &v ÐDistrict€Public€Defenderà h àà À àà  àAttorney€General€&€ReporterÐ  \ ÐÌFRANCIS€W.€PRYOR,€JR.à À àà  àELIZABETH€B.€MARNEYÐ Ø( ÐAssistant€Public€Defenderà h àà À àà  àAssistant€Attorney€GeneralÐ ¾ Ð200€Betsy€Pack€Driveà h àà À àà  à425€Fifth€Avenue€NorthÐ ¤ô ÐP.€O.€Box€220à  àà h àà À àà  àNashville,€TN€€37243„0493Ð Š Ú ÐJasper,€TN€€37347„0220à h àà À àà  àÐ p!À  Ðà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  àJAMES€MICHAEL€TAYLORÌà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  àDistrict€Attorney€GeneralÌÌà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  àWILLIAM€B.€COPELANDÌà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  àAssistant€District€Attorney€GeneralÌà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  à265€Third€Avenue,€Suite€300Ìà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  àDayton,€TN€€37321ÌÌÌÌÌÌÌÌÌÌÌÌÌÌOPINION€FILED:€€__________________________________ÌÌÌAFFIRMEDÌÌÌALAN€E.€GLENN,€JUDGEÌÌÐ ~;Î6= ÐÑ ûcÑâ  âÑ8€*ÝXXdæXXdæ8Ñâ  âÑ  ÑÌò òòòÔ‡¼£ »XXÔÓ  ÓO€P€I€N€I€O€NÔ#†X*ÝX»¼£ { #Ôó óóóÐ –æ ÐÌÌÓš ÓÓÓà ` àOn€May€6,€1997,€a€Franklin€County€grand€jury€indicted€the€defendant,€Delbert€G.ÏMosher,€on€two€counts€of€aggravated€sexual€battery.€€On€January€9,€1998,€a€jury€found€theÏdefendant€guilty€of€two€counts€of€the€lesser€included€offense,€attempt€to€commit€aggravatedÏsexual€battery.€€After€a€sentencing€hearing€on€March€4,€1998,€the€trial€court€sentenced€theÏdefendant€to€the€maximum€of€ten€years€for€each€conviction€to€run€consecutively€for€a€totalÏof€twenty€years.€€After€denial€of€his€post€trial€motions,€Mosher€timely€appealed.€€BasedÏupon€our€review€of€the€record,€and€of€applicable€law,€we€affirm€the€order€of€the€trial€court.ÌÌà ` àThe€defendant€raises€two€issues€on€appeal:ÌÓ'X„Xä h–X°œX'ÓÓÓà8 ` àà8¸ ` (#` (#àI.à8ä ¸ Ð ¸ Ð àWas€the€evidence€sufficient€to€support€a€finding€by€aÐ ¢ò Ðrational€trier€of€fact€of€the€defendantððs€guilt€of€criminalÏattempt€to€commit€aggravated€sexual€battery€in€bothÏcounts?Ð ä ¤ä ¤ ÐÌà8 ` àà8¸ ` (#` (#àII.à8ä ¸ Ð ¸ Ð àWere€the€sentences€imposed€in€compliance€with€theÐ  p Ðrequirements€of€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€40„35„101,€et€seq.Ïand€were€consecutive€sentences€properly€imposed?Ð ä ¤ä ¤ ÐÌÌÌÓÓà ` àThe€defendant,€age€63,€lived€in€the€same€trailer€park€as€the€11„year„old€victim.€€TheÏvictim€lived€across€the€street€with€her€mother,€stepfather,€and€3„year„old€sister.€€The€victimÏand€her€sister€often€went€to€the€defendantððs€trailer€to€play€board€games€and€watchÏtelevision.€€The€defendant€developed€a€close€relationship€with€the€girls€who€called€himÏð ðGrandpa.ðð€€The€victimððs€parents€were€friendly€with€the€defendant€and€trusted€him€to€beÏwith€the€girls.ÌÌà ` àThe€victim€spent€the€night€at€the€defendantððs€trailer€on€several€occasions.€€One€nightÏthe€victim€awoke€to€find€the€defendant€licking€the€inside€of€her€knee.€€Another€night€whileÏthe€defendant€and€the€victim€were€playing€a€game€in€his€trailer,€the€defendant€removed€theÏvictimððs€pants€and€tried€to€remove€her€shirt.€€The€victim€also€described€how€the€defendantÏtried€to€touch€her€ð ðprivate€partðð€and€her€bottom€and€how€he€played€a€game,€ð ðlike€licking€iceÏcream,ðð€when€he€tried€to€lick€or€kiss€her€stomach.€€The€victim€testified€the€defendant€gotÏon€top€of€her€and€touched€her€ð ðprivateðð€with€his€thumb.€€She€also€stated€the€defendant€toldÐ à905; Ðher€not€to€tell€anyone€about€what€they€did€in€his€trailer.ÌÌà ` àThe€victim€reported€the€defendantððs€actions€to€her€stepfather€who€informed€theÏpolice.€€The€defendant€was€arrested€and€ultimately€convicted€of€two€counts€of€attempt€toÏcommit€aggravated€sexual€battery.ÌÌà ` àThe€jury€convicted€the€defendant€of€two€counts€of€attempted€aggravated€sexualÏbattery.€€Here,€the€defendant€challenges€the€sufficiency€of€the€evidence€on€only€one€count.ÌÓ  ÓÌò òI.€Ð Ü, ÐSUFFICIENCY€OF€THE€EVIDENCEó óÐ ´ ÐÓ‹Óà ` àWhen€a€challenge€is€made€to€the€sufficiency€of€the€evidence,€the€standard€forÏappellate€review€is€whether,€after€considering€the€evidence€in€a€light€most€favorable€to€theÏState,€any€rational€trier€of€fact€could€have€found€the€essential€elements€of€the€crime€beyondÏa€reasonable€doubt.€€òòJackson€v.€Virginiaóó,€443€U.S.€307,€99€S.Ct.€2781,€61€L.Ed.2d€560Ð ð@ Ð(1979).€€The€defendant's€burden€of€showing€insufficiency€is€heavy,€since€all€conflicts€inÏtestimony€are€resolved€in€favor€of€the€State,€and€the€State€is€entitled€to€the€strongestÏlegitimate€view€of€the€evidence€as€well€as€all€reasonable€or€legitimate€inferences€that€mayÏbe€drawn€therefrom.€€òòState€v.€Burnsóó,€979€S.W.2d€276,€287€(Tenn.€1998).Ð  %p $ ÐÌà ` àTo€obtain€a€conviction€for€attempted€aggravated€sexual€battery,€the€State€mustÏprove€the€defendant€acted€with€the€intent€to€complete€a€course€of€action€that€wouldÏconstitute€aggravated€sexual€battery€and€his€conduct€constituted€a€substantial€step€towardÏthe€commission€of€the€offense.€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€39„12„101€(1997).€€Aggravated€sexualÏbattery,€as€applicable€here,€is€defined€as€unlawful€sexual€contact€with€a€victim€by€theÏdefendant€where€the€victim€is€less€than€thirteen€years€of€age.€€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€39„13„¼504(€a)(4)€(1997).ÌÌà ` àThe€evidence€presented€showed€the€victim€was€11€years€old.€€On€one€occasion,€theÏvictim€awoke€to€find€the€defendant€licking€the€inside€of€the€her€knee.€€For€this€count,€theÐ ä844: Ðdefendant€argues€the€inside€of€the€knee€does€not€meet€the€statutory€definition€of€intimateÏbody€part.€€òòSeeóó€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€39„13„501(1)€(1997).€€However,€regardless€of€whetherÐ |Ì Ðthe€inside€of€the€knee€is€an€intimate€body€part,€the€jury€could€have€reasonably€inferred€theÏdefendantððs€licking€of€the€victimððs€knee€to€be€a€substantial€step€toward€the€commission€ofÏaggravated€sexual€battery.€€òòSeeóó€òòState€v.€Lowryóó,€667€S.W.2d€52,€57€(Tenn.€1984)€(statingÐ à 0 Ðjury€may€infer€defendantððs€intent€when€inference€is€supported€by€sufficient€facts€andÏcircumstances).ÌÌà ` àThe€victim€further€testified€that€on€another€occasion,€the€defendant€removed€herÏpants€and€tried€to€remove€her€shirt.€€According€to€the€victim,€the€defendant€also€licked€orÏkissed€her€stomach€and€touched€her€ð ðprivateðð€with€his€thumb.€€ÌÌà ` àBased€upon€our€review,€sufficient€evidence€exists€to€support€the€juryððs€verdict€onÏboth€counts.ÌÓÓò òÓ  ÓII.€€Ð Ø( ÐÌSENTENCINGó óÓÁ"ÓÐ ° ÐÓÖ"Óà ` àHere,€the€defendant€challenges€the€trial€courtððs€classification€of€him€as€a€Range€IIÏoffender,€the€imposition€of€the€maximum€sentence€on€each€count,€and€the€imposition€ofÏconsecutive€sentences.ÌÌà ` à€When€an€accused€challenges€the€length,€range,€or€manner€of€service€of€aÏsentence,€this€Court€has€a€duty€to€conduct€a€òòde€novoóó€review€of€the€sentence€with€theÐ „*Ô%* Ðpresumption€that€the€determinations€made€by€the€trial€court€are€correct.€€Tenn.€Code€Ann.Ïðð€40-35-401(d).€€This€presumption€is€"conditioned€upon€the€affirmative€showing€in€theÏrecord€that€the€trial€court€considered€the€sentencing€principles€and€all€relevant€facts€andÏcircumstances.ðð€€òòState€v.€Ashbyóó,€823€S.W.2d€166,€169€(Tenn.€1991).€€In€conducting€a€òòdeóóÐ ¸1-2 Ðòònovoóó€review€of€a€sentence,€the€Court€must€consider:€€(a)€the€evidence,€if€any,€received€atÐ ˆ3Ø.4 Ðthe€trial€and€the€sentencing€hearing;€€(b)€the€presentence€report;€(c)€the€principles€ofÏsentencing€and€arguments€as€to€sentencing€alternatives;€€(d)€the€nature€and€characteristicsÏof€the€criminal€conduct€involved;€€(e)€any€statutory€mitigating€or€enhancement€factors;€€(f)Ð ð8@4: Ðany€statement€that€the€defendant€made€on€his€own€behalf;€€and€(g)€the€potential€or€lack€ofÏpotential€for€rehabilitation€or€treatment.€€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðððð€40-35-102,€-103,€&€-210.€€òòSeeóóÐ |Ì ÐòòState€v.€Smithóó,€735€S.W.2d€859,€863€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.€1987).Ð H˜ ÐÌÓ  Óò òA.€€Classification€as€a€Range€II€Offenderó óÐ à 0 ÐÓ/)Óà ` àThe€State€has€the€burden€of€proof€to€establish€the€sentencing€status€of€theÏdefendant.€€The€State€must€file€a€written€notice€of€intent€to€seek€an€enhanced€range€ofÏpunishment€ten€days€before€trial€with€the€notice€setting€forth€the€nature€of€the€priorÏconvictions,€the€dates€of€the€convictions,€and€the€identity€of€the€courts€in€which€theÏconvictions€occurred.€€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€40„35„202(a)€(1997).€€The€trial€court€mayÏsentence€a€defendant€as€a€Range€II€offender€when€it€finds€beyond€a€reasonable€doubt€thatÏthe€defendant€is€a€multiple€offender.ÌÌà ` àA€multiple€offender€is€a€defendant€who€has€received€ð ð[a]€minimum€of€two€(2)€but€notÏmore€than€four€(4)€prior€felony€convictions€within€the€conviction€class,€a€higher€class,€orÏwithin€the€next€two€(2)€lower€felony€classes.ðð€€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€40„35„106(a)(1)€(1997).€ÏConvictions€for€multiple€felonies,€committed€as€part€of€a€single€course€of€conduct€withinÏtwenty-four€hours,€constitute€one€conviction€for€the€purpose€of€determining€priorÏconvictions.€€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€40„35„106(b)(4)€(1997).€€ÌÌà ` àPrior€convictions€include€convictions€under€the€laws€of€any€other€state€which,€ifÏcommitted€in€Tennessee,€would€have€constituted€an€offense€cognizable€by€the€laws€of€thisÏstate.€€In€the€event€that€a€felony€from€a€jurisdiction€other€than€Tennessee€is€not€a€namedÏfelony€in€this€state,€the€elements€of€the€offense€shall€be€used€by€the€Tennessee€court€toÏdetermine€what€classification€the€offense€is€given.€€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€40„35„106(b)(5)Ï(1997).€€The€appropriate€analysis€of€prior€out„of„state€convictions€is€under€Tennessee€lawÏas€it€existed€at€the€time€of€the€out„of„state€conviction.€€òòState€v.€Brooksóó,€968€S.W.2d€312,Ð t3Ä.4 Ð313„14€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.€1997),€òòpermóó.€òòappóó.€òòdeniedóó€(Tenn.€1998).Ð @506 ÐÌà ` àIn€the€case€òòsub€judiceóó,€the€State€timely€filed€a€notice€of€intent€to€seek€an€enhancedÐ Ø8(4: Ðrange€of€punishment.€€The€Stateððs€notice€included€four€out„of„state€convictions:ÌÓÓà8 ` àà8¸ ` (#` (#à1990€Palm€Springs€County,€Florida:€€€#90002767CFA02€„€à8@Ѓàà8@Ð` (#` (#à¼Lewd€Assault,€Sexual€Battery,€Possession€of€SexualÏPhotographs;Ð ¸ Ð ¸ Ð  ÐÌà8 ` àà8¸ ` (#` (#à1984€Palm€Springs€County,€Florida:€€€#84006097CFA02€„ÏLewd€Assault.Ð ¸ Ð ¸ Ð  ÐÌÌÌÓ›1Óà ` à€For€range€enhancement€purposes,€a€"certified€copy€of€the€court€record€of€any€priorÏfelony€conviction,€bearing€the€same€name€as€that€by€which€the€defendant€is€charged€in€theÏprimary€offense,€is€prima€facie€evidence€that€the€defendant€named€therein€is€the€same€asÏthe€defendant€before€the€court,€and€is€prima€facie€evidence€of€the€facts€set€out€therein."€ÏTenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€40„35„202(a)€(1997).€€In€the€present€case,€the€State€did€not€introduceÏcertified€copies€of€the€defendantððs€prior€convictions.€€Instead,€the€State€called€LauraÏProsser,€the€Tennessee€Department€of€Corrections€employee€who€prepared€theÏpresentence€report.€€Prosser€testified€that€she€contacted€Florida€officials€who€providedÏinformation€concerning€the€defendantððs€prior€convictions.€€Such€testimony€is€allowable€asÏproof€of€an€out„of„state€conviction€during€a€sentencing€hearing.€€òòSeeóó€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ððÐ ¾ Ð40„35„209(b)€(1997)€(ð ðThe€rules€of€evidence€shall€apply,€except€that€reliable€hearsayÏincluding,€but€not€limited€to,€certified€copies€of€convictions€or€documents,€may€be€admittedÏif€the€opposing€party€is€accorded€a€fair€opportunity€to€rebut€any€hearsay€evidence€soÏadmitted.ðð).€€ÌÌà ` àThe€trial€court€made€no€finding€as€to€whether€the€defendantððs€three€1990€crimesÏwere€committed€as€part€of€a€single€course€of€conduct€within€twenty-four€hours.€€òòSeeóó€Tenn.Ð R+¢&+ ÐCode€Ann.€ðð€40„35„106(a)(1)€(1997).€€Because€such€findings€were€not€made€for€the€record,Ïthe€presumption€of€correctness€does€not€apply€and€we€must€review€this€portion€of€theÏsentencing€determination€òòde€novoóó.€€In€fact,€no€evidence€was€presented€concerning€theÐ ¶0,1 Ðcircumstances€of€the€three€1990€convictions.€€As€the€burden€of€proof€is€on€the€State€toÏestablish€the€defendantððs€sentencing€status,€we€cannot€assume€the€three€crimes€did€notÏtake€place€within€a€twenty„four€hour€period.€€Because€the€State€had€the€burden€of€proof,Ïthe€defendant€must€get€the€benefit€of€any€doubt.€€òòState€v.€Jonesóó,€901€S.W.2d€393,€397Ð ê7:39 Ð(Tenn.€Crim.€App.€1995).€€For€these€reasons,€the€three€1990€convictions€must€be€treatedÐ ¶95; Ðas€one€conviction€for€the€purpose€of€establishing€the€appropriate€sentencing€range.ÌÌà ` àIn€1990€under€Tennessee€law,€sexual€battery€was€classified€as€a€Class€E€felony.€ÏTenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€39„13„505(4)(c)€(1991).€€Therefore,€the€defendantððs€1990€convictionÏfor€sexual€battery€counts€as€one€conviction€under€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€40„35„106(a)(1)Ï(1997).€€We€are€then€left€to€consider€the€1984€conviction€for€lewd€assault.ÌÌà ` àLewd€assault€was€not€a€named€felony€in€Tennessee€in€1984.€€The€trial€court€couldÏhave€used€the€elements€of€lewd€assault€to€make€an€on€the€record€classification€of€theÏoffense€based€on€Tennessee€law€in€effect€in€1984.€€However,€because€no€such€finding€wasÏmade,€the€presumption€of€correctness€does€not€apply€and€we€must€review€this€portion€ofÏthe€sentencing€determination€òòde€novoóó.Ð tÄ ÐÌà ` àIn€Florida,€at€the€time€the€defendant€committed€the€crime€in€1984,€lewd€assault€wasÏdefined€as:€ÌÓÓà8 ` àà8¸ ` (#` (#àAny€person€who€shall€handle,€fondle€or€make€an€assault€uponÏany€child€under€the€age€of€14€years€in€a€lewd,€lascivious€orÏindecent€manner,€or€who€shall€knowingly€commit€any€lewd€orÏlascivious€act€in€the€presence€of€such€child,€without€the€intentÏto€commit€involuntary€sexual€battery€shall€be€guilty€of€a€felonyÏof€the€second€degree,€punishable€as€provided€in€ðð€775.082,€ððÏ775.083€or€ðð775.084.Ð ¸ Ð ¸ Ð  ÐÌÓm?ÓFla.€St.€Ann.€ðð€800.04€(1979)€(amended€1984).ÌÌà ` àThe€elements€of€lewd€assault,€as€described€in€Fla.€St.€Ann.€ðð€800.04€(1979)Ï(amended€1984),€are€equivalent€to€those€of€sexual€battery€as€it€existed€under€TennesseeÏlaw€in€1984€which€was€a€felony,€punishable€by€confinement€for€not€more€than€five€yearsÏin€the€penitentiary.€€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€39„2„607€(1982).€€Thus,€the€defendantððs€1984Ïconviction€for€lewd€assault€counts€as€a€felony€conviction€under€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€40„35„¼106(a)(1)€(1997).ÌÌà ` àBased€on€our€analysis€of€the€defendantððs€out„of„state€convictions,€the€defendant€hasÏtwo,€but€not€more€than€four€prior€felony€convictions€within€the€conviction€class,€a€higherÐ Ð8 4: Ðclass,€or€within€the€next€two€lower€felony€classes.€€For€this€reason,€the€defendant€wasÏproperly€classified€as€a€Range€II€offender.€€òòSeeóó€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€40„35„106(a)(1)€(1997).Ð |Ì ÐÌÓ  Óò òB.€€Imposition€of€the€Maximum€Sentenceó óÐ  d ÐÓEÓà ` à€In€the€case€òòsub€judiceóó,€the€trial€court€found€the€existence€of€four€enhancementÐ ì < Ðfactors€listed€in€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€40„35„114€(1997):ÌÓ0X„XÅ h–XX„Xä h–X0Óà8 ` àà8¸ ` (#` (#àÓÓ(1)à8Å ¸ Ð ¸ Ð àThe€defendant€has€a€previous€history€of€criminalÐ ˆØ  Ðconvictions€or€criminal€behavior€in€addition€toÏthose€necessary€to€establish€the€appropriateÏrange;Ð Å ÃÅ Ã ÐÌà8 ` àà8¸ ` (#` (#à(8)à8Å ¸ Ð ¸ Ð àThe€defendant€has€a€previous€history€ofÐ V Ðunwillingness€to€comply€with€the€conditions€of€aÏsentence€involving€release€in€the€community;Ð Å ÃÅ Ã ÐÌà8 ` àà8¸ ` (#` (#à(13)à8Å ¸ Ð ¸ Ð àThe€felony€was€committed€while€on€any€of€theÐ žî Ðfollowing€forms€of€release€status€if€such€release€isÏfrom€a€prior€felony€conviction:€.€.€.€€(C)€Probation;ÏandÐ Å ÃÅ Ã ÐÌà8 ` àà8¸ ` (#` (#à(15)à8Å ¸ Ð ¸ Ð àThe€defendant€abused€a€position€of€public€orÐ l Ðprivate€trust,€or€used€a€special€skill€in€a€mannerÏthat€significantly€facilitated€the€commission€or€theÏfulfillment€of€the€offense.Ð Å ÃÅ Ã ÐÌÓdFÓThe€court€found€no€applicable€mitigating€factors.ÌÌà ` àEnhancement€factor€(8)€was€improperly€applied.€€No€evidence€exists€in€the€recordÏthat€the€defendant€has€a€previous€history€of€unwillingness€to€comply€with€the€conditions€ofÏa€sentence€involving€release€in€the€community.€€The€fact€that€these€offenses€wereÏcommitted€while€the€defendant€was€on€probation€is€applicable€to€enhancement€factor€(13),Ïwhich€the€trial€court€also€found€was€applicable.ÌÌÔ‡ XyB XXX*ÝÔà ` àÔ#†X*ÝX X XyB'L#ÔÔ€X*ÝXXX*ÝÔIn€1990,€the€defendant€was€convicted€of€lewd€assault€and€possession€of€sexualÐ ú.J*/ Ðphotographs.€€These€convictions€are€in€addition€to€those€necessary€to€establish€theÏappropriate€range.à Å à€Thus,€enhancement€factor€(1)€was€properly€applied.€€Likewise,Ð ’2â-3 Ðenhancement€factor€(15)€was€applicable,€as€the€trial€court€determined,€because€ampleÏevidence€also€exists€that€the€defendant€abused€a€position€of€trust.€€Testimony€showed€theÏdefendant€cultivated€a€close€relationship€with€the€victim€and€her€family.€€The€victimððsÏparents€trusted€the€defendant€with€their€two€young€children.€€The€victim€referred€to€theÐ Â95; Ðdefendant€as€ð ðGrandpaðð€and€often€spent€time€alone€with€him.€€òòSeeóó€òòState€v.€Kissingeróó,€922Ð ° ÐS.W.2d€482,€488€(Tenn.€1996).ÌÌà ` à€Even€though€we€have€found€one€of€the€four€enhancement€factors€was€improperlyÏapplied,€we€do€not€find€that€the€trial€court€erred€in€imposing€the€maximum€sentence€of€tenÏyears€on€both€counts.€€òòSeeóó€òòState€v.€Keelóó,€882€S.W.2d€410,€423€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.),€òòpermóó.Ð ¬ ü  Ðòòappóó.€òòdeniedóó€(Tenn.€1994)€(ð ðmere€fact€that€this€Court€has€found€the€trial€court€erroneouslyÐ xÈ  Ðapplied€enhancement€factors€.€.€.€does€not€mean€the€appellant€is€entitled€to€have€hisÏsentence€reducedðð).€€Attempted€aggravated€sexual€battery€is€a€Class€C€felony.€€Tenn.ÏCode€Ann.€ðððð€39„12„107€&€39„13„504(b)€(1997).€€A€Range€II€sentence€for€a€Class€C€felonyÏis€a€sentence€of€not€less€than€six€nor€more€than€ten€years.€€In€sentencing€a€Range€IIÏoffender,€the€trial€court€is€to€begin€at€the€minimum€sentence€in€the€range.€€If€there€areÏenhancement€but€no€mitigating€factors,€the€trial€court€may€set€the€sentence€above€theÏminimum,€but€still€within€the€range.€€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€40„35„210€(1997).€€Based€on€ourÏreview€of€the€record€and€the€applicable€enhancement€factors,€the€maximum€sentence€ofÏten€years€on€each€count€was€appropriate.ÌÌÓ  Óò òC.€€Imposition€of€Consecutive€Sentencesó óÐ <#Œ" ÐÓmTÓà ` àConsecutive€sentencing€is€governed€by€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€40„35„115€(1997).€€ThisÏsection€allows€consecutive€sentencing,€at€the€discretion€of€the€trial€court,€if€one€of€theÏseven€statutory€criteria€is€found€to€exist€by€a€preponderance€of€the€evidence.€€The€trialÏcourt€found€ðð€40„35„115(b)(6)€(ð ðThe€defendant€is€sentenced€for€an€offense€committed€whileÏon€probationðð)€applied€in€this€case.€€ÌÌà ` àThe€record€reveals€ample€evidence€supporting€the€trial€courtððs€decision€to€orderÏconsecutive€sentences.€€€The€defendant€has€committed€similar€crimes€in€the€past.€€He€hasÏalso€served€portions€of€two€separate€prison€sentences€for€sex„related€crimes€againstÏchildren.€€Considering€the€defendantððs€criminal€history€and€the€nature€of€his€present€crime,Ïwe€find€the€trial€courtððs€decision€to€order€consecutive€sentencing€was€proper.Ì€€€Ð Ø8(4: Ðà ` àThis€assignment€has€no€merit.ÌÌà ` àFor€the€foregoing€reasons,€we€affirm€the€decision€of€the€court€below.ÌÌÓÓÌÔ‡ X*ÝXXX*ÝÔà ` àà ¸ àà Å àà h àà À àà  à________________________________________Ð Æ   Ðà ` àà ¸ àà Å àà h àà À àà  àALAN€E.€€GLENN,€JUDGEÌÌÌCONCUR:ÌÌÌÌÌ____________________________________ÌJOSEPH€M.€TIPTON,€JUDGEÌÌÌÌÌ____________________________________ÌJOE€G.€RILEY,€JUDGEÌà ` àÔ#†X*ÝXX X*ÝÓX#ÔÌ