ÿWPCõ$ …# VUNa %¯ 0(µ4Ýñb 0ª 0D² ö U:þ 8 8 w @ J 0JR 0Tœ 0^ð 0hN 0r¶ 0|( 0†¤ 0* 1uº B/ 0dL D3° 0@ãU>#U *aB)‹DC´ AM÷îD32ekj*Õv~ÿvÓ} AOP#ÆŸ# 0De$ D/©$ BØ$˜HP LaserJet 4Si/4SiMX PS 600dpiPSCRIPTÀÌÀääÀÀÌ0 (ÖÃ9 Z ‹6Times New Roman RegularX($¡¡©U!½¬ @ d3|xh- ù-(Z(2úª$¤¤Ý ƒ!ÝÝ  ÝÒ4°ÒÒ„°ÒÔ€X‹íXXXÔòòà Œ àòòÚ  Ú0Ú  Úóó(#Ã$òòÚ  Ú0Ú  Úóó,†r‰AZ‹"Arial Regular]Ó€2 ÿÿ0Indent1Ô2ÔÔ3  Ô2" ÿÿ0Indent2à0 àÔ2ÔÔ3  Ô2, ÿÿ0Indent3à0 àà0 àÔ2ÔÔ3  Ô26 ÿÿ0Indent4à0 àà0 àà0 àÔ2ÔÔ3  Ô2@ ÿÿ0Indent5à0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àÔ2ÔÔ3  Ô2J ÿÿ0Indent6à0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àÔ2ÔÔ3  Ô2T ÿÿ0Indent7à0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àÔ2ÔÔ3  Ô2^ ÿÿ0Indent8à0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àÔ2ÔÔ3  Ô !" ÿÿ?AGMSYaioIndent0I.A.1.a.(1)(a)i)a) dP ÿÿ8Mac DefaultMac DefaultÓ ` °šXÓ$$$$'ÿÿdxd("ÿÿ$££Ò  ÒÒ  Ò< Œ 9p`(&Times New Roman< Œ 9p`(Arial% Line 7 d00007Border 1dd€-1Cþÿ << Gÿÿ äÝ ƒ!ÝÔ€.ÔÝ  ÝÔ€/ÔÔ€/ÔÓ  ÓÔ YYY ÔFILEDÔ€/XÔÌÌò òSeptember€17,€1996ÌÌCecil€Crowson,€Jr.ÌÔ€/ôÔAppellate€Court€Clerkó ó )Ý ƒ!ÝÑ#€d#ÑÔ€.ÔÝ  ÝÝ ƒ $ÝÒ 4 ÒÒ „ ÒÔ€/Ôòòà àòòÚ  ÚÚ  ÚóóÝ  ÝThe€circumstances€of€this€case€and€the€appeal€are€disconcerting.€€On€January€17,€1995,Ïthe€appellant's€counsel€motioned€the€trial€court€for€a€continuance.€€Trial€was,€at€that€time,€set€forÏJanuary€19,€1995.€€The€appellant's€counsel€conveyed€that€he€wished€to€attend€an€inaugurationÏevent€on€the€night€of€the€trial.€€The€trial€court€attempted€to€accommodate€counsel's€request.€€DueÏto€conflicting€schedules€and€a€busy€docket,€the€trial€court€was€unable€to€reset€the€case.€€The€courtÏdid,€however,€inform€counsel€that€he€could€either€call€some€of€his€witnesses€on€January€18,€1995Ïor€impanel€the€jury€on€the€18th€to€expedite€the€case,€thereby€affording€counsel€the€opportunity€toÏattend€the€inauguration.Ìà àOur€concern€is€that€after€accommodating€his€own€personal€schedule,€counsel€apparentlyÏfailed€to€notify€his€client,€the€appellant,€of€the€changes.€€As€a€result,€the€appellant€was€not€presentÏwhen€his€jury€was€impaneled.€€Furthermore,€the€appellant's€trial€counsel€is€also€handling€thisÏappeal.€€Due€to€counsel's€failure€to€conform€to€the€Tennessee€Rules€of€Appellate€Procedure,€anyÏerrors€at€trial€have€been€waived.Ì ûÝ ƒ!ÝÑ#€d#ÑÔ€.ÔÝ  ÝÝ ƒ $ÝÒ 4 ÒÒ „ ÒÔ€/Ôòòà àòòÚ  ÚÚ  ÚóóÝ  ÝAlthough€the€record€before€us€does€not€indicate€whether€the€appellant€waived€hisÏpresence€requirement€by€motion,€it€is€possible€that€the€issue€was€fully€addressed€via€oral€motionÏduring€the€impaneling€process.€€òòSeeóó€Tenn.€R.€Crim.€P.,€Rule€43(a)€(stating€"[u]nless€excused€byÏthe€court€upon€defendant's€motion,€the€defendant€shall€be€present€at€the€arraignment€[and]€atÏevery€stage€of€the€trial€including€the€impaneling€of€the€jury€.€.€.€.").€€If,€however,€the€matter€was€notÏproperly€resolved€at€trial,€the€appellant€may€seek€remedy€in€a€collateral€proceeding.òƒòÌ aÝ ƒ!ÝÑ#€d#ÑÔ€.ÔÝ  ÝÝ ƒ $ÝÒ 4 ÒÒ „ ÒÔ€/Ôòòà àòòÚ  ÚÚ  ÚóóÝ  ÝThe€trial€court€suspended€all€but€the€first€thirty€days€of€the€appellant's€four€year€sentence.€ÏIn€addition,€the€appellant€was€to€be€eligible€for€work€release.Ì Ý ƒ!ÝÑ#€d#ÑÔ€.ÔÝ  ÝÝ ƒ $ÝÒ 4 ÒÒ „ ÒÔ€/Ôòòà àòòÚ  ÚÚ  ÚóóÝ  ÝThe€appellant€repeatedly€threatened€his€wife€with€a€shotgun€in€the€presence€of€theirÏchildren.ÌPtPtHHÚ(ÿáÿâùFG(üHHÚ(d'@Styl{WP}01•ÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃà Ãà Ãà Ãà Ãà ÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÐ ÐÐHHÐÐ  ÐÐ2ÐÐÿÿ¸æ$ÿÐÐHHÐÐÐÐÐÐÐÐ  ÐÐ ÐÐ ÐÑÑÑGenevaÑÑ ÑÑ € ÑÑ<Px–ÈÑÒÒÒ443!#4ÒÒ$ *$ÒÒ$*$ÒÒ ÿKK ÒÒ  Geneva ÒÒ  Geneva ÒÓ.,ÓÓÓÓ6ÓÓ ÓßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßÑGenevaÑÑ ÑÒ  BA Op Geneva ÒÒ  BA Op Geneva Ò€-‚ƒCþÿ<< CÿÿƒLevel 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5($$””ò òÚ  Ú1Ú  Úó ó„„'÷ÿ dxdüÿP PdÝ ƒ!ÝÔ . ÔÔ€.ÔÝ  ÝÒ 4 ÒÒ „ ÒÔ€/ÔÑ\R AØ'\Ñ›à àò òIN€THE€COURT€OF€CRIMINAL€APPEALS€OF€TENNESSEEÌÌÙ€€ÙÓ ` ܆XDp”X ÓœßL€231;+'h|` Å `€€Lß›à àà àà à€€€€€€€€€€à à€€€€àQ àAT€KNOXVILLEÌÌÓ` °‡XDp”XÓà à€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€à ààQ àà àAUGUSTÏ1996€SESSIONó óÌÌÌÌÌà àÓ ` ®DÓò òÌÓ` cÓSTATE€OF€TENNESSEE,à àó ó)€ÌÓ ` ¸ cÓà àà à)€C.C.A.€No.€03C01„9508„CC„00212Ìà àAppellee,à à)ÌÓ ` ¸ cùÓà àà à)à àBlount€CountyÌV.€€€€€€€à à)Ìà àà à)€Honorable€D.€Kelly€Thomas,€Jr.,€JudgeÌò òà àó óà à)ò òÌGREGORY€MUSE,ó óà à)€(Aggravated€Assault)€à àà à)€€€€€€€€€€€€€€à àAppellant.à à)ÌÌÌÌÌÓ` ÓFOR€THE€APPELLANT:à àFOR€THE€APPELLEE:ÌÌKevin€W.€Shepherdà àCharles€W.€BursonÌAttorney€at€Lawà àAttorney€General€&€Reporter€Ì404€Ellis€AvenueÌMaryville,€TN€37804à àEugene€J.€HoneaÌà àAssistant€Attorney€GeneralÌà àCriminal€Justice€DivisionÌà à450€James€Robertson€ParkwayÌà àNashville,€TN€37243„0493ÌÌà àMichael€L.€FlynnÌà àDistrict€Attorney€GeneralÌÌà àPhilip€H.€MortonÌà àAsst.€Dist.€Attorney€GeneralÌà à363€Court€StreetÌà àMaryville,€TN€37804Ìà àà àà àà àÌÌÌÌÌOPINION€FILED:€€___________________ÌÌÌò òAFFIRMEDÌó óÌÌò òPAUL€G.€SUMMERS,ó óÌJudgeÌÌÌÓ ` ¸ pÓò òÔ  Ôà àà ààQ àO€P€I€N€I€O€Nó óÌÌÑ  ÑÑ7€6fXXdìXXdì7ÑÑ€ ÑÌÓÓà àA€jury€convicted€the€appellant,€Gregory€Muse,€of€aggravated€assault.€€HeÏwas€sentenced€to€four€years€with€all€but€the€first€thirty€days€suspended.€€OnÏappeal,€he€argues€that:ÌÓÓà8 à1.€€The€trial€court€committed€reversible€error€by€impaneling€the€juryÏwithout€his€presence,€andÌÌà8 à2.€€That€his€sentence€was€excessive.ÌÌÓÓWe€affirm.ÌÌÓ  Óò òFACTSó óÌÓ  ÓÌà àThe€appellant€and€his€wife€were€involved€in€a€domestic€dispute.€€TheÏappellant€apparently€found€out€that€his€wife€was€having€an€adulterous€affair.€€HeÏthreatened€her€with€a€shotgun€and€held€her€captive€until€the€police€arrived.€€SheÏsustained€bruises€as€a€result€of€the€appellant's€prodding€her€with€the€barrel€ofÏhis€shotgun.ÌÌÓ  Óò òJURY€IMPANELINGó óÌÓ  ÓÌà àThe€appellant's€first€issue€has€been€waived.€€It€was€incumbent€upon€theÏappellant€to€prepare€a€record€that€included€all€materials€necessary€for€properÏdisposition€of€his€appeal.€€Tenn.€R.€App.€P.,€Rule€24(b).€€The€record€before€usÏdoes€not€contain:€€(1)€€the€motion€for€new€trial,€€(2)€€a€transcript€of€the€voir€direÏproceedings,€(3)€€a€transcript€of€a€motion€for€new€trial€hearing,€(4)€€any€exhibits,Ïor€(5)€€copies€of€pretrial€motions.€€We€are€troubled€by€this€transmission€of€suchÏan€inadequate€record.€€A€large€portion€of€the€record€is€included,€but€what€weÏhave€is€not€germane€to€the€issues€raised.€€Moreover,€the€appellant's€failure€toÏinclude€a€copy€of€a€timely€filed€motion€for€new€trial€constitutes€waiver.€€Tenn.€R.ÏApp.€P.,€Rule€3.ÌÌà àPursuant€to€Rule€52(b),€however,€we€can€review€for€"plain€error."€€Tenn.ÏR.€Crim€P.,€Rule€52(b).€€However,€since€we€have€no€transcript€of€the€jury'sÍimpaneling,€the€record€fails€to€clearly€establish€what€occurred€in€the€trial€court.× ƒ4 ××  ×€ÏWe€are,€therefore,€unable€to€invoke€a€Rule€52(b)€review.œ× ƒ5 ××  ×›€€This€issue€is€waived.ÌÌÓ  Óò òSENTENCINGó óÌÓ  ÓÌà àThe€appellant's€last€issue€challenges€his€sentence.€€He€argues€that:€€(1)€Ïthe€trial€court€erred€in€denying€full€and€immediate€probation,€and€(2)€€he€shouldÏhave€received€a€minimum€range€sentence.€€We€disagree.ÌÌà àWhen€a€sentencing€issue€is€appealed,€this€Court€shall€conduct€a€òòdeóó€òònovoóóÏreview€with€the€presumption€that€the€trial€court's€findings€are€correct.€€Tenn.ÏCode€Ann.€ðð€40„35„401(d)€(1990);€€òòState€v.€Byrdóó,€861€S.W.2d€377,€379€(Tenn.ÏCrim.€App.€1993).€€The€presumption€of€correctness€is€conditioned€upon€anÍaffirmative€showing€that€the€trial€court€considered€the€sentencing€principles€andÏall€relevant€facts€and€circumstances.€€òòState€v.€Ashbyóó,€823€S.W.2d€166,€169Ï(Tenn.€1991).ÌÌà àIn€conducting€a€òòdeóó€òònovoóó€review€of€a€defendant's€sentence,€this€CourtÏmust€consider:€€(1)€the€evidence€received€at€the€trial€and€the€sentencingÏhearing,€(2)€the€presentence€report,€(3)€the€principles€of€sentencing€andÏarguments€to€sentencing€alternatives,€(4)€the€nature€and€characteristics€of€theÏcriminal€conduct,€(5)€any€mitigating€and€Ô  Ôenhancement€factors,€(6)€anyÏstatements€made€by€the€defendant€in€his/her€own€behalf,€and€(7)€theÏdefendant's€potential€for€rehabilitation€or€treatment.€€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðððð€40„35„210,€„103,€and€„210€(1990);€òòState€v.€Smithóó,€735€S.W.2d€859,€862€(Tenn.€Crim.ÏApp.€1987).ÌÌÓ  Óò òDENIAL€OF€PROBATIONó óÌÓ  ÓÌà àThe€trial€judge€found€the€appellant€to€be€a€proper€candidate€forÏalternative€sentencing€and€ordered€split€confinement.× ƒ6 ××  ×€€We€find€that€both€theÏnature€and€the€circumstances€of€the€offenseœ× ƒ7 ××  ×›€support€the€trial€judge'sÍconclusion.€€The€trial€judge€had€a€much€greater€vantage€point€with€which€toÏassess€the€appellant,€his€attitude,€and€his€potential€for€rehabilitation.€€We,Ïtherefore,€affirm€the€denial€of€full€probation.ÌÌÓ  Óò òLENGTH€OF€SENTENCEó óÌÓ  ÓÌà àThe€appellant's€sentence€range,€as€a€Range€I€standard€offender,€wasÏthree€to€six€years.€€The€trial€judge€applied€one€enhancement€factor:€€The€offenseÏwas€committed€without€hesitation€when€the€risk€to€human€life€was€high.€€InÏmitigation,€the€trial€judge€found€that€the€appellant€had€no€criminal€record.€€TheÏtrial€judge,€however,€apparently€found€that€the€enhancement€factor€outweighedÏthe€mitigating€factor€œand€ordered€a›€four€year€sentence.ÌÌà àIn€felony€sentencing,€the€minimum€sentence€is€presumed.€€Tenn.€CodeÏAnn.€ðð€40„35„210(c).€€Procedurally,€the€trial€court€increases€the€sentence€withinÏthe€range€for€enhancement€factors€and€follows€with€a€reduction€for€mitigatingÏfactors.€€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€40„35„210(d)€&€(e).€€"[T]here€is€no€particular€valueÏassigned€by€this€statute€to€the€various€factors€and€the€'weight€afforded€mitigatingÏor€enhancement€factors€derives€from€balancing€relative€degrees€of€culpabilityÏwithin€the€totality€of€the€circumstances€of€the€case€involved.'"€€òòState€v.€Salazaróó,ÏNo.€02C01„9105„CR„00098,€slip€op.€4„5€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.€Jan.€15,€1991)Ï(quoting€òòState€v.€Mossóó,€727€S.W.2d€229,€238€(Tenn.€1986)).Ìò òÌÓ  ÓENHANCEMENT€FACTORSó óÌÓ  ÓÌà àThe€appellant€argues€that€the€trial€court€erred€in€enhancing€his€sentenceÏpursuant€to€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€40„35„114(10).€€Factor€(10)€permitsÏenhancement€when€a€defendant€has€no€hesitation€about€committing€a€crimeÏinvolving€a€high€risk€of€human€life.€€òòIdóó.€€He€maintains€that€the€factor€isÏinapplicable€because€it€is€inherent€in€the€offense.ÌÌà àThe€state€asserts€that€the€relevant€inquiry€is€not€whether€the€factor€isÏinherent€but€whether€the€factor€was€an€essential€element€of€the€indicted€offense.€ÏIn€addition€to€factor€(10),€the€state€argues€that€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€40„35„114(16)Ïshould€have€also€been€applied.€€Factor€(16)€permits€enhancement€for€crimesÏ"committed€under€circumstances€under€which€the€potential€for€bodily€injury€to€aÏvictim€was€great."€€òòIdóó.ÌÌà àAggravated€assault€is€assault€coupled€with€either€serious€bodily€injury€orÏuse€of€a€deadly€weapon.€€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€39„15„401,€402€(1995€Supp.).€ÏThe€appellant€was€convicted€of€aggravated€assault€by€employing€a€deadlyÏweapon.€Although€elements€of€the€indicted€offense,€factors€(10)€and€(16)€mayÏbe€applicable€if€the€facts€demonstrate€a€culpability€distinct€from€and€appreciablyÏgreater€than€that€incident€to€the€convicted€offense.€€òòState€v.€Jonesóó,€883€S.W.2dÏ596€(Tenn.€1994).€€Separate€and€distinct€culpability€may€arise€when€individualsÏother€than€the€victim€are€present€and€subject€to€peril.€€òòSeeóó€òòState€v.€Makokaóó,€885ÍS.W.2d€366,€373€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.€1994)€(holding€factor€(10)€applicable€whenÏother€possible€victims€are€present).ÌÌà àThe€appellant's€children€were€in€danger€since€they€were€in€closeÏproximity€to€the€victim.€€The€victim€testified€that€her€son€was€sitting€beside€her,Ïand€her€daughter€was€crawling€around€when€the€appellant€threatened€her€withÏhis€shotgun.€€This€conduct€demonstrated€a€culpability€distinct€from€that€of€theÏindicted€offense.€€Accordingly,€we€find€factors€(10)€and€(16)€applicable.ÌÌÓ  Óò òMITIGATING€FACTORSó óÌÓ  ÓÌà àThe€appellant€argues€that€the€trial€court€erred€in€refusing€to€apply€Tenn.ÏCode€Ann.€ðð€40„35„113(11).€€This€factor€permits€mitigation€for€offensesÏcommitted€under€such€unusual€circumstances€that€it€is€unlikely€a€sustainedÏintent€to€violate€the€law€motivated€the€offender's€conduct.€€òòIdóó.ÌÌà àThe€appellant€has€waived€this€issue€by€failing€to€present€argument€or€citeÏauthority.€€Tenn.€R.€Ct.€Crim.€App.,€Rule€10(b).€€Notwithstanding€waiver,€we€findÏthe€issue€devoid€of€merit.ÌÌÓ  Óò òCONCLUSIONó óÌÌÓ  Óà àThe€record€supports€application€of€enhancement€factors€(10)€and€(16).€€InÏmitigation,€we€find€that€the€appellant€had€no€prior€criminal€record.€€The€evidenceÏdoes€not€preponderate€against€the€four€year€sentence€imposed€by€the€trialÏjudge.€€The€split€confinement€sentence,€as€adjudged,€is€affirmed.ÌÌÌÌÓÓà àà à__________________________________Ìà àà àPAUL€G.€SUMMERS,€JudgeÌÌÌCONCUR:ÌÌÌÌÌ________________________________ÌJOE€B.€JONES,€Presiding€JudgeÌÌÌÌÌ________________________________ÌDAVID€G.€HAYES,€Judge