ÿWPCp _xdÅ$×£‰ 0ðbÁÐÑíófòLðÐ5€mŸ ¤ÊÓ×׉pL1w¶}åÑáq{tGŒtÌ:£F¿SÕ‰‰6w)é×îóÑÀíßiKp‹1õeŠ¥Å8´¯-2Sí®ïYçÕÌðª¼RýtØÁp{Ê™ • 蚫ڌíx묈BÚ^/pÀtø37\›Ì[=T}½zG_g² Ú'†ˆÊgþnè¼tÆê,õÆGuþ‹GGÃ|jE‚О“½Iø…låš—Wš‡Þ £ÂÇàç [AÕ˜ :×gù8Çõ±3N¶ÁµçüwDŒ×\}ÖÝ%ƒhôŠ›MIŽV3Xi¹!~¬k±ñ„/3ëy¥#›Oó¤>@ö 1~èé~~¢µP¼“3N„z{ÌŽè²AWŤM(`$ŠÞÀ#_wéÛ¦c[,å:LDpÀb;}'þÂ}þ÷Ý»ªR£>ª"ÎBŸi Ãé9n¦0ŽÄ¹®{K \6bdÝ!5âYö¦—¢²óÖÉ©Ï,ºL‹Ø2BÙwgº…F>Ê~ad+é‡F%”Ï*ÊÑRµ¾dÕ¬¤S’—n…# F %Q UNW 0Æ¥ k 4s ‡ E– 0 Û w@åU:% 0D_U:£U:ÝæU:ýýýýýýýýýýýýýýýýýýýý B777777 D3TTT 0D‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡ AOËÆ 0Dà D/$ BS˜HP LaserJet 4SiHPPCL5MS,ü,,,,,ü0nLhÎX(ÖÃ9 Z ‹6Times New Roman Regular(žjÆ$¡¡Ñ` ` ÑÑÜÜÑÒ4°ÒÒX°ÒÑTR[  AØ'ÿ Legal[  AØ'ÿ Legal AØ'ÿ Legal AØ'ÿ LegalTÑÓÓuM%3|xŽ  ;Ý ƒ ÷F$ÝÒ4°ÒÒX°ÒÓÓà Œ àòòÚ  Ú1Ú  ÚóóÝ  ÝÔ€ XSÛXXXÔÔ€ ôª¾ôX XSÛÔÓÓThe€defendant€was€convicted€for€arson€in€Wilson€County€and€received€a€CommunityÐ `  ÐCorrections€sentence.€(º(3eB$¤¤Ý ƒjÆ!ÝÑ` °ÑÑܰÑÒ4°ÒÒX°ÒÑTR[  AØ'ÿ Legal3Ø' AØ'ÿ Legalÿ3Ø'TÑÓÓÝ  Ýà Œ àòòÚ  Ú0Ú  Úóó | } e~ D € E ‚ Dƒ „ U… Ó€,c½¬AZ‹"Arial Regular(#Ã$òòÚ  Ú0Ú  Úóó,c½¬AZ‹"Arial Regular, øð AZ"Arial Regular ÜÔ€Xc·XXXÔÔ€^XXc·ÔÓ  Óò òÔ Ad ÔFILEDÔ€Xc·X^ÔÐ  ÐÌMarch€11,€1999ÌÌCecil€W.€CrowsonÌAppellate€Court€ClerkÔdAMÔó ó,c½¬AZ‹"Arial Regular d$$$$'ÿÿdxd(3¯$££Ý ƒ!ÝÝ  Ý€-‚ƒCþÿ<< CÿÿƒLevel 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5($$””ò òÚ  Ú1Ú  Úó ó„„'÷ÿ dxdüÿP PdÝ ƒjÆ!ÝÑ` °ÑÑܰÑÒ4°ÒÒX°ÒÑTR[  AØ'ÿ Legal3Ø' AØ'ÿ Legalÿ3Ø'TÑÓÓÝ  Ýñ} ñ›ñ} ññ} ñ›ñ} ñÑ7€—[XdìdÈ7ÑÑ  ÑÔ€ Xc·XXXÔñ… ñœßr€*<,(j 8` `€€@E f ` 8ttxPX` ð  rß›ñ… ñà@g g ÚàòòIN€THE€COURT€OF€CRIMINAL€APPEALS€OF€TENNESSEEóóˆÐ `  Ðà@ùù*ÚàòòAT€€NASHVILLEóóˆÐ , Ì Ðà@ÇÇ&ÚàNOVEMBER€1998€SESSIONˆÌÌSTATE€OF€TENNESSEE,à ” àà ì à*à D àC.C.A.€#€01C01„9708„CR„00329Ð 0 Ðà Œ àà ä àAppellee,à ” àà ì à*à D àDAVIDSON€COUNTYÐ \ü  ÐVS.à Œ àà ä àà < àà ” àà ì à*à D àHon.€J.€Randall€Wyatt,€Jr.,€JudgeÐ (È  ÐÓÓMICHAEL€D.€MARTIN,€JR.,à ì à*à D à(Vandalism€and€Burglary)Ð ô”  ÐÌà Œ àà ä àAppellant.à ” àà ì à*Ð À` ÐÌÌÌÌÌòòFor€Appellantóó:à < àà ” àà ì àà D àòòFor€Appelleeóó:Ð $Ä ÐÌLionel€R.€Barrett,€Jr.,€Attorneyà ì àà D àJohn€Knox€WalkupÐ ð ÐWashington€Square€Two,€Suite€418à D àAttorney€General€and€ReporterÐ Öv Ð222€Second€Avenue€North€ÌNashville,€TN€€37201à ” àà ì àà D àTimothy€BehanÐ ¢!B Ðà Œ àà ä àà < àà ” àà ì àà D àAssistant€Attorney€GeneralÌà Œ àà ä àà < àà ” àà ì àà D àSecond€Floor,€Cordell€Hull€BuildingÌà Œ àà ä àà < àà ” àà ì àà D à425€Fifth€Avenue€North€à ¤ àà ü! àà T$ àÐ T$ô Ðà Œ àà ä àà < àà ” àà ì àà D àNashville,€TN€€37243„0493ÌÌà Œ àà ä àà < àà ” àà ì àà D àKaty€Novak€MillerÌà Œ àà ä àà < àà ” àà ì àà D àAssistant€District€Attorney€GeneralÌà Œ àà ä àà < àà ” àà ì àà D àWashington€Square,€Suite€500€Ìà Œ àà ä àà < àà ” àà ì àà D à222€Second€Avenue€North€Ìà Œ àà ä àà < àà ” àà ì àà D àNashville,€TN€€37201„1649€ÌÌÌÌÌOPINION€FILED:__________________________ÌÌÌÌÌAFFIRMED€AS€MODIFIEDÌÌÌÌÌGARY€R.€WADE,€PRESIDING€JUDGEÐ  8¸.4 ÐÓÓà@33-ÚàòòOPINIONóóˆÐ `  Ðà Œ àà ä àThe€defendant,€Michael€D.€Martin,€Jr.,€entered€pleas€of€guilt€toÏvandalism€and€burglary.€€The€plea€agreement€provided€that€the€sentences€would€beÏconcurrent€and€that,€after€a€hearing,€the€trial€court€would€determine€both€the€lengthÏof€the€sentence€and€the€method€of€service.€€At€the€conclusion€of€the€sentencingÏhearing,€the€trial€court€imposed€a€six„year€sentence€for€vandalism€over€$10,000.00,Ïa€Class€C€felony,€and€a€four„year€sentence€for€burglary,€a€Class€D€felony.€ÌÌà Œ àà ä àIn€this€appeal€of€right,€the€general€issue€is€whether€the€sentence€wasÏappropriate.€€For€the€reasons€hereafter€stated,€we€modify€the€judgment€of€the€trialÏcourt€to€provide€for€four„and„one„half„year€and€three„year€sentences.€€Otherwise€theÏjudgment€is€affirmed.€€ÌÌà Œ àà ä àOn€July€27,€1996,€Reverend€Barry€L.€Cox,€Sr.,€the€pastor€at€Scott'sÏChapel€A.M.E.€Church,€received€a€telephone€call€from€a€church€custodian,€who€hadÏdiscovered€damage€to€the€premises.€€Upon€inspection,€Reverend€Cox€discoveredÏthat€church€funds€had€been€stolen,€the€building€had€been€vandalized,€and€officeÏequipment€had€been€destroyed.€€He€estimated€the€cost€of€repair€at€$35,000.00.€€TheÏchurch,€which€was€over€100€years€old,€was€caused€to€miss€tithes€and€offerings€dueÏto€canceled€services€for€which€Reverend€Cox€sought€restitution.€€He€stated€thatÏinsurance€costs€had€doubled€and€as€a€result€of€the€defendant's€misconduct,€that€aÏsecurity€system€had€to€be€installed,€and€that€certain€of€the€members€had€beenÏemotionally€scarred€by€the€experience.€€The€congregation€is€composed€primarily€ofÏAfrican„Americans.€€Reverend€Cox€sought€"the€maximum€sentence."€€ÌÌà Œ àà ä àThere€was€evidence€that€the€defendant€and€two€of€his€juvenile€friends,Ïages€seventeen€and€fifteen,€had€damaged€the€church€organ.€€At€least€one€of€theÐ 8¸.4 Ðyouths€made€photo€copies€of€his€buttocks€and€placed€them€throughout€the€church.€ÏOne€or€more€of€them€urinated€in€the€sanctuary.€€A€refrigerator€and€a€water€coolerÏwere€damaged€and€change€was€taken€from€a€drink€machine.€€The€defendantÏdamaged€a€drum€set.€€Computers€and€televisions€were€broken.€€ÌÌà Œ àà ä àThe€defendant,€who€had€been€in€jail€for€approximately€one€year€at€theÏtime€sentence€was€imposed€on€August€1,€1997,€was€eighteen€years€old€at€the€timeÏof€the€offense.€€Although€he€had€quit€school,€he€obtained€his€GED€during€hisÏconfinement.€€He€produced€medical€records€from€the€Vanderbilt€Psychiatric€FacilityÏfor€Adolescents€indicating€a€history€of€suicide€attempts€and€self„mutilation.€€He€wasÏcounseled€at€the€Luton€Mental€Health€Services€Facility€and€was€diagnosed€asÏhaving€an€attention€deficit€disorder.€€ÌÌà Œ àà ä àThe€defendant,€who€had€no€prior€adult€record,€testified€that€he€had€noÏplace€of€residence€at€the€time€of€his€offense€and€for€about€one€year€had€slept€in€aÏclubhouse€"in€the€woods."€€He€stated€that€he€listed€his€residence€with€his€mother€andÏstepfather€and€had€limited€contact€with€his€natural€father.€€While€conceding€that€heÏwas€the€oldest€of€the€three€individuals€involved€in€the€incident,€he€claimed€that€heÏwas€not€the€leader€and€had€€entered€a€window€of€the€church€only€after€the€othersÏhad€done€so.€€He€claimed€that€his€aim€was€to€steal€money€from€the€Coke€machine.€ÏHe€stated€that€when€his€friends€began€to€vandalize€the€church,€he€followed€suit€onlyÏto€show€that€he€was€not€a€"sissy."€€He€conceded€that€he€had€attempted€suicide€andÏhad€experienced€truancy€in€school.€€He€claimed€a€history€of€drug€and€alcohol€usage:ÌÓÓà8 Œ àà8ä Œ (#Œ (#àI€was€more€or€less€killing€myself,€I€guess€you€would€say.€ÏI€...€didn't€have€nowhere€to€stay€and€I€[was]€just€alwaysÏreal€depressed€and€...€that€was€my€down€point€in€life,€IÏguess.Ð ä Ð ä Ð  ÐÌÌÌÓÓà Œ àà ä àDuring€his€confinement€in€jail,€the€defendant€completed€a€TeenÐ þ8ž/5 ÐChallenge€course€and€participated€weekly€in€a€Bible€study€offered€by€Life€ChallengeÏMinistries€and€led€by€Mary€Novak.€€ÌÌà Œ àà ä àThe€defendant€acknowledged€that€he€was€responsible€for€fifteen€toÏtwenty€percent€of€the€vandalism€in€the€church.€€œñ ñThe€defendñ ññ€ ññ ñnat,€ñ ññ€ ññ ñant,€a€Caucasian,Ïñ ññ‚ ñHe›Ïñ‚ ñclaimed›€that€none€of€his€actions€were€racially€motivated.€€He€stated€that€if€released,Ïhe€would€work€with€his€father,€live€with€his€aunt,€and€pay€for€the€damages€done€toÏthe€church.€€He€asked€to€continue€in€psychological€and€drug€counseling.€€TheÏdefendant€admitted€that€he€had€broken€into€a€lawnmower€shop€in€Wilson€County׃×Ý ƒ %ÃÝòòÚ  Ú1Ú  ÚóóÝ  Ý×  ×Ð À` Ðand€stolen€a€motorcycle€on€the€same€night€as€these€crimes€and€was€responsible€forÏvandalizing€some€equipment€there.€€ÌÌà Œ àà ä àThe€defendant's€mother,€Cynthia€Pittman,€confirmed€that€theÏdefendant€had€been€living€on€the€streets€and€had€refused€to€attend€school€despiteÏher€efforts€to€require€his€attendance€through€the€juvenile€court.€€She€blamed€theÏabsence€of€the€defendant's€father€for€his€emotional€problems.€€She€testified€that€theÏdefendant€had€been€placed€in€the€Vanderbilt€Psychiatric€Unit€on€four€differentÏoccasions,€some€of€which€were€due€to€suicide€attempts.€€Ms.€Pittman€claimed€thatÏher€son€was€remorseful€for€his€misdeeds,€had€changed€for€the€better,€and€regularlyÏadhered€to€his€prescription€schedule€of€Ritalin€and€Clonidine.€ÌÌà Œ àà ä àMary€Ann€Harris,€the€defendant's€aunt,€testified€that€the€defendantÏcould€reside€in€her€two„bedroom€condominium.€€An€employee€of€Wright€Industries€inÏNashville,€she€stated€a€willingness€to€report€any€violation€of€conditions€of€releaseÏshould€the€defendant€be€granted€a€Community€Corrections€sentence.€€SeveralÐ €4 +0 Ðsupportive€letters€appear€in€the€file.€€ÌÌà Œ àà ä àThe€assistant€district€attorney€general€sought€the€maximum€sentenceÏbut€asked€for€a€jail€sentence€rather€than€a€sentence€to€the€Department€ofÏCorrections.€€The€trial€court€also€refused€bail€on€appeal.€€The€Davidson€CountyÏCommunity€Corrections€report€suggested€an€assessment€and€proposed€a€plan€ofÏsupervision€as€follows:€ÌÓÓà8 Œ àà8ä Œ (#Œ (#à1.à < àThe€defendant€to€find€a€residence€which€is€à8@,ä Ð ä Ð àÐ ô”  Ðsuitable€for€the€court€and€Community€Corrections.€€Ð ä Ð ä Ð  ÐÌà8 Œ àà8ä Œ (#Œ (#à2.à8<ä Ð ä Ð àParticipate€with€any€treatment€deemedÐ ¦F Ðnecessary€through€the€DCCCP€dayÏreporting€center.Ð <x<x ÐÌà8 Œ àà8ä Œ (#Œ (#à3.à8<ä Ð ä Ð àSecure€and€maintain€fulltime€employment.€Ð >Þ ÐWork€must€consist€of€forty€hours€per€week,Ïbe€verified€by€payroll€checks,€and€notÏexceed€curfew€restrictions.Ð <x<x ÐÌà8 Œ àà8ä Œ (#Œ (#à4.à8<ä Ð ä Ð àPerform€240€hours€of€community€serviceÐ ¼ \ Ðwork€at€a€rate€of€16€hours€per€month.€€Ð <x<x ÐÌà8 Œ àà8ä Œ (#Œ (#à5.à < àUndergo€random€drug€tests.€€Ðn#ä Ð ä Ð  ÐÌà8 Œ àà8ä Œ (#Œ (#à6.à8<ä Ð ä Ð àComply€with€all€levels€of€supervision€thatÐ :%Ú Ðwill€consist€of€a:Ð <x<x ÐÌà8 Œ àà8ä Œ (#Œ (#àà8<ä Ð ä Ð à7:00€PM€curfew€with€two€weekly€contactÏvisits€the€first€90€days,€8:00€PM€curfew€withÏtwo€weekly€contact€visits€the€next€90€days,Ï9:00€PM€curfew€with€one€weekly€contactÏvisit€thereafter.€Ð <x<x ÐÌà8 Œ àà8ä Œ (#Œ (#à7.à8<ä Ð ä Ð àPay€supervision€fee€of€$45.00€per€month.€€ÐP-ð#(<x<x ÐÌà8 Œ àà8ä Œ (#Œ (#à8.à8<ä Ð ä Ð àPay€court€costs€and€fines;€monthlyÐ /¼%* Ðpayments€to€be€made.Ð <x<x ÐÌà8 Œ àà8ä Œ (#Œ (#à9.à8<ä Ð ä Ð àAdhere€to€all€recommendations€of€the€courtÐ Î1n(- Ðand€the€DCCCP.€€Ð <x<x ÐÌÌÌÓÓà Œ àà ä àThe€trial€court,€in€imposing€the€maximum€sentence,€placed€emphasisÏupon€the€"senseless€and€outrageous€conduct"€of€the€defendant€which€had€resultedÐ 8¸.4 Ðnot€only€in€damage€to€the€church€but€also€to€its€pastor€and€members€as€well.€€TheÏsentence€imposed€required€incarceration€in€the€Department€of€œCorrectionñ~ ñsñ~ ñ:›€€ÌÓÓà8 Œ àà8ä Œ (#Œ (#àThis€is€a€case€that€involves€the€house€of€God,€a€placeÏthat€these€people,€under€the€direction€of€Reverend€Cox,Ïcome€to€worship€and€to€praise€God....€€[T]hey€were€in€thatÏchurch€and,€obviously,€did€what€they€did€as€a€result€ofÏsome€distorted€attitude€toward€a€church€and€the€peopleÏthat€come€to€that€church€and€worship.Ð ä Ð ä Ð  ÐÌà@--.Úà*€*€*ˆÌÌà8 Œ àà8ä Œ (#Œ (#àI€think€he€was€destroying,€desecrating€a€church....€€I€thinkÏhe€probably€knew€who€went€to€that€church€and,€evenÏthough€it€can't€be€clear€from€what€I€heard€here€today,€thatÏprobably€...€this€matter€had€racial€overtones....€€...ThisÏchurch€has€been€there€since€the€1800's....€€I€think€whatÏhe€did€was€outrageous,€inexcusable,€something€that€thisÏcourt€has€a€zero€tolerance€for.€€Ð ä Ð ä Ð  ÐÌÌÌÓÓà Œ àà ä àThe€trial€court€determined€that€the€sentence€should€be€enhanced€dueÏto€the€significant€damage€done€and€because€the€crime€appeared€to€be€committed€toÏgratify€a€desire€for€excitement.€€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€40„35„114(6),€(7).€€While€the€trialÏcourt€did€not€determine€that€the€defendant€was€a€leader€in€the€commission€of€theÏoffense,€it€did€determine€that€the€offense€involved€more€than€one€victim.€€Tenn.ÏCode€Ann.€ðð€40„35„114(3).€€The€trial€court,€while€acknowledging€the€defendant€hadÏdone€some€"good€things,"€did€not€find€mitigating€circumstances€and€concluded€thatÏplacement€on€a€Community€Corrections€program€would€depreciate€the€seriousnessÏof€the€offense.€€ÌÌà Œ àà ä àWhen€there€is€a€challenge€to€the€length,€range,€or€manner€of€service€ofÏa€sentence,€it€is€the€duty€of€this€court€to€conduct€a€de€novo€review€with€aÏpresumption€that€the€determinations€made€by€the€trial€court€are€correct.€€Tenn.€CodeÏAnn.€ðð€40„35„401(d).€€This€presumption€is€"conditioned€upon€the€affirmative€showingÏin€the€record€that€the€trial€court€considered€the€sentencing€principles€and€all€relevantÏfacts€and€circumstances."€€òòState€v.€Ashbyóó,€823€S.W.2d€166,€169€(Tenn.€1991).€€TheÐ þ8ž/5 ÐSentencing€Commission€Comments€provide€that€the€burden€is€on€the€defendant€toÏshow€the€impropriety€of€the€€sentence.€€ÌÌà Œ àà ä àOur€review€requires€an€analysis€of€(1)€the€evidence,€if€any,€received€atÏthe€trial€and€sentencing€hearing;€(2)€the€presentence€report;€(3)€the€principles€ofÏsentencing€and€the€arguments€of€counsel€relative€to€sentencing€alternatives;€(4)€theÏnature€and€characteristics€of€the€offense;€(5)€any€mitigating€or€enhancing€factors;€(6)Ïany€statements€made€by€the€defendant€in€his€own€behalf;€and€(7)€the€defendant'sÏpotential€for€rehabilitation€or€treatment.€€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðððð€40„35„102,€„103,€and€Ì„210;€òòState€v.€Smithóó,€735€S.W.2d€859,€863€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.€1987).Ð Œ, ÐÌà Œ àà ä àAt€the€time€of€the€offense,€the€presumptive€sentence€for€these€Class€CÏand€Class€D€felonies€was€the€minimum€of€the€range€if€there€were€no€enhancementÏand€mitigating€factors.€€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€Ô‡XSÛXX XSÛÔððÔ#† XSÛXXXSÛÙ7#Ô€40„35„210(c).€€Should€the€trial€court€findÐ ¼ \ Ðmitigating€and€enhancement€factors,€it€must€start€at€the€minimum,€enhance€theÏsentence€based€upon€any€applicable€enhancement€factors,€and€then€reduce€theÏsentence€based€upon€any€appropriate€mitigating€factors.€€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€Ô‡XSÛXX XSÛÔððÔ#† XSÛXXXSÛB9#Ô€40„35„Ð  &À  Ð210(e).€The€weight€given€to€each€factor€is€discretionary€with€the€trial€court€so€long€asÏthe€record€supports€its€findings€and€it€complies€with€the€1989€Sentencing€Act.€€òòSeeóóÐ ¸)X $ ÐòòAshbyóó,€823€S.W.2d€at€169.€€The€trial€court€must,€however,€make€specific€findings€onÐ „+$"& Ðthe€record€which€indicate€its€application€of€the€sentencing€principles.€€Tenn.€CodeÏAnn.€Ô‡XSÛXX XSÛÔðððð€Ô#† XSÛXXXSÛ2;#Ô40„35„209,€„210.Ð /¼%* ÐÌà Œ àà ä àAmong€the€factors€applicable€to€the€defendant's€application€forÏprobation€are€the€circumstances€of€the€offense,€the€defendant's€criminal€record,Ïsocial€history,€and€present€condition,€and€the€deterrent€effect€upon€and€best€interestÏof€the€defendant€and€the€public.€€òòState€v.€Grearóó,€568€S.W.2d€285,€286€(Tenn.€1978).€œñ„ ñÐ 8¸.4 Ðñ„ ñ›€à Œ àà ä àEspecially€mitigated€or€standard€offenders€convicted€of€Class€C,€D,€orÐ `  ÐE€felonies€are€presumed€to€be€favorable€candidates€"for€alternative€sentencingÏoptions€in€the€absence€of€evidence€to€the€contrary."€€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€40„35„¼102(6).€€With€certain€statutory€exceptions,€none€of€which€apply€here,€probation€mustÏbe€automatically€considered€by€the€trial€court€if€the€sentence€imposed€is€eight€yearsÏor€less.€€Tenn.€Code€€Ann.€ðð€40„35„303(a),€(b).ÌÌà Œ àà ä àThe€purpose€of€the€Community€Corrections€Act€of€1985€was€to€provideÏan€alternative€means€of€punishment€for€"selected,€nonviolent€felony€offenders€inÏfront-end€community€based€alternatives€to€incarceration."€€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ððÏ40-36-103.€€The€Community€Corrections€sentence€provides€a€desired€degree€ofÏflexibility€that€may€be€both€beneficial€to€the€defendant€yet€serve€legitimate€societalÏaims.€€òòState€v.€Griffithóó,€787€S.W.2d€340,€342€(Tenn.€1990).€€That€a€defendant€meetsÐ ð Ðthe€minimum€requirements€of€the€Community€Corrections€Act€of€1985,€however,Ïdoes€not€mean€that€he€is€entitled€to€be€sentenced€under€the€Act€as€a€matter€of€lawÏor€right.€€òòState€v.€Tayloróó,€744€S.W.2d€919€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.€1987).€€The€followingÐ T$ô Ðoffenders€are€eligible€for€Community€Corrections:ÌÓÓÒXÒÒä 4Ò(1)€€Persons€who,€without€this€option,€would€beÏincarcerated€in€a€correctional€institution;ÌÌ(2)€€Persons€who€are€convicted€of€property-related,€orÏdrug/alcohol-related€felony€offenses€or€other€felonyÏoffenses€not€involving€crimes€against€the€person€asÏprovided€in€title€39,€chapter€2€[repealed],€parts€1-3€andÏ5-7€or€title€39,€chapter€13,€parts€1-5;ÌÌ(3)€€Persons€who€are€convicted€of€nonviolent€felonyÏoffenses;ÌÌ(4)€€Persons€who€are€convicted€of€felony€offenses€inÏwhich€the€use€or€possession€of€a€weapon€was€notÏinvolved;ÌÌ(5)€€Persons€who€do€not€demonstrate€a€present€or€pastÏpattern€of€behavior€indicating€violence;ÌÌ(6)€€Persons€who€do€not€demonstrate€a€pattern€ofÐ þ8ž/5 Ðcommitting€violent€offenses;€€andÌÌ(7)€€Persons€who€are€sentenced€to€incarceration€or€onÏescape€at€the€time€of€consideration€will€not€be€eligible.€€ÌÒ4ä ~BÒÒXpBÒÌÓÓTenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€40-36-106(a).ÌÌà Œ àà ä àThe€defendant€contends€that€the€trial€court€failed€to€consider€many€ofÏthe€statutory€principles€in€the€imposition€of€sentence.€€In€particular,€he€complainsÏthat€the€sentence€imposed€should€be€the€least€severe€measure€necessary€toÏachieve€the€purpose€of€the€1989€Act.€€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€40„35„103(4).€€He€arguesÏthat€the€trial€court€failed€to€consider€his€potential€for€rehabilitation€despite€aÏlegislative€mandate€encouraging€alternatives€to€incarceration.€€Tenn.€Code€Ann.Ïðð40„35„103(5),€(6).€€ÌÌà Œ àà ä àThe€defendant€also€argues€that€nothing€in€the€record€indicates€that€theÏcrimes€were€either€racially€or€religiously€motivated€and€that€the€trial€court€erred€byÏinferring€that€from€the€race€of€the€defendant€or€the€makeup€of€the€church.€€TheÏdefendant€points€out€that€the€sentencing€guidelines€do€not€authorize€trial€courts€toÏmake€distinctions€in€sentencing€based€upon€the€use€of€the€building€burglarized€orÏvandalized:ÌÓÓà8 Œ àà8ä Œ (#Œ (#àThere€is€no€question€of€the€sincerity€and€good€intentionsÏof€the€trial€court,€but€it€is€submitted€that€the€sentence€wasÏbased€upon€impermissible€factors.€€A€state€trial€courtÏcannot€impose€a€greater€sentence€for€vandalizing€aÏchurch€than€it€would€for€vandalizing€an€adult€book€store.€ÏOur€law€and€sentencing€structures€do€not€authorize€thisÏtype€of€deviation€based€upon€the€personal€values€andÏpreferences€of€the€trial€court,€even€though€those€viewsÏmight€reflect€the€view€of€the€majority€of€the€citizens.Ð ä Ð ä Ð  ÐÌÓÓFinally,€the€defendant€argues€that€the€trial€court€erred€by€determining€that€"the€wholeÏcongregation€was€a€victim"€in€applying€that€enhancement€factor.€€òòSeeóó€Tenn.€CodeÐ f5,1 ÐAnn.€ðð€40„35„114(3).€€He€argues€that€a€public€or€private€building€used€or€supportedÏby€a€group€of€individuals,€such€as€a€high€school€or€a€country€club,€would€not€haveÐ þ8ž/5 Ðrequired€the€application€of€the€enhancement€factor€described€in€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ððÏ40„35„114(3).€€ÌÌà Œ àà ä àAmong€the€many€applicable€statutory€factors€in€the€imposition€of€aÏsentence€is€that€the€sentence€imposed€should€be€"the€least€severe€measureÏnecessary€to€achieve€the€purposes€for€which€the€sentence€is€imposed."€€Tenn.€CodeÏAnn.€ðð€40„35„103(4).€€The€1989€Act€encourages€"alternative€sentencing€inÏcorrectional€programs€that€elicit€voluntary€cooperation€of€defendants...."€€Tenn.€CodeÏAnn.€ðð€40„35„102(3)(C).€€Prison€space€is€limited€and€our€statute€contemplates€theÏuse€of€the€Department€of€Correction€for€"convicted€felons€committing€the€mostÏsevere€offense,€possessing€criminal€histories€evincing€a€clear€disregard€for€the€lawsÏand€morals€of€society,€and€evincing€failure€of€past€efforts€at€rehabilitation...."€€Tenn.ÏCode€Ann.€ðð€40„35„102(5).€€The€potential€for€rehabilitation€is€an€importantÏconsideration.€€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€40„35„103(5).€€"Trial€judges€are€encouraged€toÏuse€alternatives€to€incarceration€that€include€requirements€of€reparation,€victimÏcompensation€and/or€community€service."€€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€40„35„103(6).€€TheÏ1989€Act€encourages€trial€courts€to€review€not€only€the€enhancement€factors€in€theÏimposition€of€sentence€but€also€the€mitigating€factors.€€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€40„35„¼113,€„114.€€ÌÌà Œ àà ä àIn€this€instance,€the€record€establishes€that€the€trial€court€did€notÏconsider€certain€of€the€principles€applicable€to€sentencing.€€There€wereÏenhancement€factors€and€the€trial€court€did€reject€the€state's€assertion€that€theÏdefendant€was€a€leader€in€the€commission€of€the€offense.€€We€do€not€disagree€withÏany€of€the€conclusions€reached€in€those€regards;€however,€there€was€no€specificÏfinding€as€to€the€presence€or€absence€of€possible€mitigating€factors.€€The€proofÏsuggests€that€mitigating€factors€were€present.€€For€example,€there€was€no€indicationÐ 8¸.4 Ðthat€the€defendant's€conduct€threatened€serious€bodily€injury.€€Tenn.€Code€Ann.Ïðð40„35„113(1).€€There€was€proof€that€the€defendant,€because€of€his€youth,€lackedÏsubstantial€judgment.€€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€40„35„113(b).€€The€defendant's€history€ofÏpsychiatric€care,€evidence€of€depression,€his€living€circumstances,€and€his€diagnosisÏof€attention€deficit€disorder€which€improved€during€incarceration€through€medicationÏand€treatment,€provide€support€to€the€presence€of€that€mitigating€factor.€€Moreover,Ïthe€record€confirms€that€the€defendant€suffered€from€a€"mental€...€condition"€thatÏmay€have€had€an€effect€upon€his€degree€of€culpability.€€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€40„35„¼113(8).€€Some,€although€not€great€weight,€should€have€been€attached€to€thoseÏfactors.€€That€the€defendant€earned€his€GED€in€jail,€that€he€took€his€prescribedÏmedications,€and€that€he€had€improved€himself€through€participation€in€programsÏavailable€to€jail€inmates€are€perhaps€of€more€importance€and,€at€a€minimum,Ïsuggest€a€potential€for€rehabilitation.€€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€40„35„113(13).€€That€theÏtrial€court€failed€to€consider€any€one€of€these€as€possible€mitigation€in€determiningÏthe€length€of€the€sentences€indicates€that€our€review€should€be€de€œnovoñƒ ñ€without€aÏpresumption€of€correctnessñƒ ñ.›€€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€40„35„401(d);€òòAshbyóó,€823€S.W.2dÐ T$ô Ðat€169.€€ÌÌà Œ àà ä àOffenders,€especially€youthful€offenders,€who€are€convicted€ofÏproperty„related€crimes€rather€than€violent€offenses€have€been€recognized€by€theÏLegislature€as€legitimate€candidates€for€a€Community€Corrections€sentence.€ÏBecause€this€defendant€had€spent€a€considerable€amount€of€time€in€jail€and€couldÏhave€been€ordered€into€the€Community€Corrections€program€with€specific€conditionsÏattached,€including€more€jail€time,€an€alternative€senñ{ ññz ñnñz ññ{ ññ| ñtence€ñ| ñmay€have€been€a€betterÏoption€under€these€circumstances.€€There€would€have€been€an€incentive€forÏcontinued€good€behavior,€a€monitoring€of€restitution€efforts,€and,€at€the€same€time,Ïpunishment€for€other€crimes.€€This€sentencing€issue€is,€however,€largely€mootÐ 8¸.4 Ðbecause€the€defendant,€who€could€not€make€a€$30,000.00€bail€before€entering€theÏplea€agreement,€was€denied€the€opportunity€of€bail€on€appeal.€€By€the€time€this€caseÏwas€assigned€for€disposition,€he€had€been€placed€on€parole€by€the€Department€ofÏCorrection.€€ÌÌà Œ àà ä àIn€summary,€by€the€application€of€all€of€the€principles€andÏconsiderations€governing€sentencing,€this€court€modifies€each€of€the€two€sentencesÏto€mid„range.€€There€were€enhancement€factors€which€warranted€a€greater€weightÏthan€those€mitigating€factors€present.€€The€sentence€for€burglary,€a€Class€D€felony,Ïwhich€may€be€from€two€to€four€years€for€a€Range€I€offender,€is€modified€to€threeÏyears.€€For€vandalism€over€$10,000.00,€involving€a€possible€range€of€three€to€sixÏyears,€the€sentence€is€modified€to€four€and€one„half€years.€€While€a€CommunityÏCorrections€sentence€coupled€with€a€term€in€jail€would€have€been€a€moreÏconstructive€alternative€in€these€circumstances,€the€fact€that€the€defendant€is€nowÏon€parole€compels€us€to€affirm€the€denial€of€his€request€for€a€Community€CorrectionsÏsentence.€€ÌÌÓÓà Œ àà ä àà < àà ” àà ì àà D à________________________________Ìà Œ àà ä àà < àà ” àà ì àà D àGary€R.€Wade,€Presiding€Judge€ÌÌCONCUR:ÌÌÌÌ_____________________________ÌJohn€H.€Peay,€JudgeÌÌÌÌ_____________________________ÌJerry€L.€Smith,€Judge€