ÿWPCO _‚ é*‚^× þWÇï:¶Èñp,–ÀÎþ³ø|œç¯¾ÂØ R³2?¾mÑ_Nþâ–8rLönîøá‡Ç£®1$”ˆ”m@TôÿÑXh^p³“iñÚU&§„ù…ô—'ë ÜaP˜ê5í¬7[µ'?v!b ¢$jCàŽ‰p©¯-5`¨ê‘³ÏVå9;@+7æ(m9”½ßEB…ž}“Qp#ÝÜfX“ÈàCÈÀÒaÂÃ&W:Ö ÍùÌ {þ–•uQ·:ñb9ü£–%~1°£5ò–§†pÓ})B‹ X‘(|†8g©ƒSɼ¸Ʋþ9nôŠ~ìSzíz»¬à+ÉŽL «úwFé–§N¡lâæ0ÃpUÆ\)V)Ì\ð›¯ÿpÔ¾É 7¿#¸ýxǧŸ¤XÜk:¤sÔ0bš É÷GDË$­3Kíϼ_’quàÀ+’…ë¶ár ãþ›¥kcÓ®w¼“VµŒÚ›ÇQic{ì½@h”$ç6ÒúÐÇ6^ˆÌ±3¤Ï‰ÝdÏß5¢êN|xÓÄî€ÇÊ%tuRÑKyKƒÂxú#S3g"t”Ë\ð_üs*ãÚ¤}„:,£Çñóäõcã‹–û˜¾$†g盪Þ#Kwç"`UN@ %Ž 0(”U:¼wö4úŠ 0z§ ! 0D& šj   / 7 L #Áb N#^ %1 m33pJU:ººººººººº Bôôôôôôôôôôôôôôôôôôôôôôôôôôôôôôôôôôôôôôôôôôôôôôôôôôôôôôô ASÆd 0V* 0V€ 0DÖÖ D5(ÈhH  Z ‹6Times New Roman RegularX($¡¡, øð AZ‹"Arial Regular¬sp'3|x1st Deg. Murder Ï  0 ' IB012R120IB012R12 .   (*(2Œà$¤¤Ý ƒ!ÝÝ  ÝÒ°Òà ` àòòÚ  Ú0Ú  Úóó ûÝ ƒ Œà$ÝÒ°Òà ` àòòÚ  Ú2Ú  ÚóóÝ  ÝThe€medical€examiner€testified€that€the€damage€done€by€this€particular€shot€wasÐ ° Ðconsistent€with€a€shot€fired€after€the€body€was€already€on€the€ground.(#Ã$òòÚ  Ú0Ú  Úóó Ý ƒ Œà$ÝÒ°Òà ` àòòÚ  Ú1Ú  ÚóóÝ  ÝThis€is€one€of€the€shots€which€defendant€Pride€admitted€firing. Ñ  Ñ Ñ  Ñ Ñ  Ñ Ñ  јHP LaserJet 4000 Series PCL 6ÈÈÈÈÈÈÈÈ0 ˜†'L ÿU‹ÿÀÀÀ fÝ ƒ[½Ö"ÝÔUSUS.,ÔÝ  ÝÔ_ÔÔ€XZXXXÔÔ€äXXZÔÓ  Óò òÔ Ad ÔFILEDÔ€XZXäÔÐ  ÐÌNovember€29,€1999Ð ˜˜ ÐÌCecil€Ô_ÔCrowsonÔ_Ô,€Jr.Ð dd ÐAppellate€Court€ClerkÔdAŠÔó ó, øð AZ‹"Arial Regular dZ[\]_Eþÿ<<CÿÿƒLevel 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5(.3½Ö$¢¢Ý ƒüœ!ÝÔUSUS.,ÔÝ  Ý(.3½Ö$££Ý ƒüœ!ÝÔUSUS.,ÔÝ  Ý($$””ò òÚ  Ú1Ú  Úó ó"""")ÿÿ!dxdxÝ ƒ!ÝÝ  ÝÔ_ÔÒ°ÒÔ€XZXXXÔÓ  ÓÑTR[ì AØ'ÿ LegalXà3Ø' Letter  AØ'ÿ Legalÿ3Ø'TÑßx€Y_B2.jzÝÿðÿ`  `€€@ÿE¥°` ttx0ݰð àxßà@ àò òIN€THE€COURT€OF€CRIMINAL€APPEALS€OF€TENNESSEEˆÐ ° ÐÌà@ŽŽ(àAT€JACKSONˆÐ |Ì ÐÌà@ÓÓ"àSEPTEMBER€1999€SESSIONˆÐ H˜ ÐÌÌÌSTATE€OF€TENNESSEE,ó óà@÷÷-à)ˆÐ à 0 Ðà@÷÷-à)ˆà p àò òNO.€W1999„01243„CCA„R3„CDó óÐ Æ   Ðà ` àAppellee,à@÷÷-à)ˆÐ ¬ ü  Ðà@÷÷-à)ˆà p àò òÔ_ÔTIPTONÔ_Ô€COUNTYó óÐ ’â  Ðò òVS.ó óà@÷÷-à)ˆÐ xÈ  Ðà@÷÷-à)ˆà p àò òHON.€JOSEPH€H.€WALKER,Ð ^®  ÐMICHAEL€D.€PRIDE€€andó óà@÷÷-à)ˆà p àò òJUDGEó óÐ D”  Ðò òÔ_ÔTERRANCEÔ_Ô€B.€SMITH€ó óà@÷÷-à)ˆÐ *z  Ðà@÷÷-à)ˆÐ ` Ðà ` àAppellants.à@÷÷-à)ˆà p à(First€Degree€Murder)Ð öF ÐÌÌÌÒ(ä „¸ @(#(#(Òò òòòFOR€THE€APPELLANTSóó:Ð ŽÞ ÐÌD.€MICHAEL€Ô_ÔDUNAVANTÔ_Ôó ó€(For€Pride)€ò òÐ Zª Ðó óP.O.€Box€150Ð @ ÐRipley,€TN€€38063Ð &v Ð(At€Trial€and€On€Appeal)Ð  \ Ðò òÌC.€MICHAEL€ROBBINSó ó€(For€Smith)ò òÐ Ø( Ðó ó46€North€Third€Street,€Suite€719ò òÐ ¾ Ðó óMemphis,€TN€€38301Ð ¤ô Ð(On€Appeal)Ð Š Ú Ðò òÌGARY€F.€Ô_ÔANTRICANÔ_Ôó ó€(For€Smith)ò òÐ V"¦! Ðó óDistrict€Public€Defender€Ð <#Œ" Ðò òÌDAVID€S.€STOCKTONó ó€(For€Smith)ò òÐ %X $ Ðó óAssistant€District€Public€DefenderÐ î%>!% ÐP.O.€Box€700Ð Ô&$"& ÐSomerville,€TN€€38068Ð º' #' Ð(At€Trial€and€On€Appeal)Ð  (ð#( Ðò òòòFOR€THE€APPELLEEóó:Ð ŽÞ( ÐÌPAUL€G.€SUMMERSó óÐ Zª* ÐAttorney€General€and€ReporterÐ @+ ÐÌò òCLINTON€J.€MORGANó óÐ  \- ÐAssistant€Attorney€GeneralÐ òB. ÐÔ_ÔCordellÔ_Ô€Hull€Building,€2nd€FloorÐ Ø(/ Ð425€Fifth€Avenue€NorthÐ ¾0 ÐNashville,€TN€€37243„0493Ð ¤ô1 ÐÌò òELIZABETH€T.€RICEó óÐ p!À3 ÐDistrict€Attorney€GeneralÐ V"¦4 ÐÌò òJAMES€W.€Ô_ÔFREELANDÔ_Ô,€JR.ó óÐ "$r6 ÐAssistant€District€Attorney€GeneralÐ %X 7 Ð302€Market€StreetÐ î%>!8 ÐSomerville,€TN€€38068Ð Ô&$"9 ÐÒ(ä „¸ @ìì(ÒÐ l*¼%9 ÐÌÌÌÌÌò òOPINION€FILED:€òò€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€óóÐ Ð/ +? ÐÌÌÌAFFIRMED€Ð h3¸.C ÐÌÌÌJOE€G.€RILEY,€JUDGEÐ  7P2G ÐÔ_Ôó óÓÓÑ8€LýXXdædÈ8ÑÑ€rÑÑ€ P¸ÑÑ€rÑÑ€P¸Ñà@qq*àò òOPINIONó óˆÐ ° ÐÌà ` àA€Tipton€County€jury€convicted€defendants,€Michael€D.€Pride€and€TerranceÐ H˜ ÐB.€Smith,€of€premeditated€first€degree€murder.€€Each€was€sentenced€to€lifeÐ  d Ðimprisonment.€€In€this€appeal€as€of€right,€each€defendant€challenges€the€sufficiencyÐ à 0 Ðof€the€evidence€upon€which€the€jury€based€its€convictions.€€Defendant€Pride€alsoÐ ¬ ü  Ðchallenges€the€trial€courtððs€failure€to€suppress€a€videotape€of€the€crime€scene€andÐ xÈ  Ðthe€defendantsðð€arrest.€€After€a€complete€review€of€the€record,€we€ò òAFFIRMó ó€theÐ D”  Ðjudgment€of€the€trial€court.Ð ` ÐÌÌà@[[)àò òI.FACTSó óˆÐ tÄ ÐÌà ` àThe€victim€and€defendants€were€apparently€friends.€€On€April€12,€1998,€theyÐ  \ Ðarrived€at€and€departed€from€the€Smith/Edwards€party€together€in€the€victimððs€car.€Ð Ø( ÐDefendant€Smith€was€wearing€a€red€Tommy€Hilfiger€shirt€and€a€white€cap.€€WithinÐ ¤ô Ðfifteen€minutes€of€their€last€departure,€the€partyððs€hosts€received€news€of€the€victimððsÐ p!À  Ðmurder.Ð <#Œ" ÐÌà ` àAt€approximately€7:00€p.m.,€Ms.€Michelle€Johnson€witnessed€defendants€andÐ Ô&$"& Ðthe€victim€standing€alongside€the€victimððs€green€Chevrolet€automobile€at€theÐ  (ð#( Ðintersection€of€Simonton€and€Wortham€in€Tipton€County.€€Uncharacteristically,€theÐ l*¼%* Ðvictim€did€not€acknowledge€her€greeting€at€that€time.€€Upon€her€return€to€theÐ 8,ˆ', Ðintersection€just€minutes€later,€she€pulled€up€behind€the€victimððs€car€where€she€sawÐ .T). Ðdefendants€sitting€in€the€car,€but€did€not€see€the€victim.€€She€sped€away€whenÐ Ð/ +0 Ðdefendant€Price€frightened€her€by€running€back€to€her€car,€banging€on€theÐ œ1ì,2 Ðpassenger„side€window€and€trying€to€open€the€locked€door.Ð h3¸.4 ÐÌÌà ` àWhile€speaking€with€her€mother€in€a€driveway€near€the€intersection€ofÐ Ì84: ÐWortham,€Ms.€Lane€Howard€heard€several€loud€gunshots€and€heard€a€man€scream.€Ð ° ÐWhen€she€went€around€to€the€driver„side€of€her€minivan,€she€saw€the€back€of€a€manÐ |Ì Ðholding€a€gun€in€his€right€hand.€€The€man€stood€near€the€tree€line€€and€wore€a€red,Ð H˜ Ðshort„sleeved€shirt.€€At€trial,€Howard€identified€the€shirt€worn€by€Smith€the€eveningÐ  d Ðof€the€shooting€as€similar€to€that€worn€by€the€man€she€witnessed€in€the€field.€Ð à 0 ÐHoward€also€thought€the€man€she€saw€wore€a€white€cap.€€As€she€and€her€motherÐ ¬ ü  Ðran€inside€the€house,€Ms.€Howard€heard€another€round€of€shots,€but€did€not€seeÐ xÈ  Ðwho€fired€them.€Ð D”  ÐÌà ` àPolice€responded€to€the€scene€of€the€shooting€in€less€than€ten€minutes.€€TheyÐ Ü, Ðfound€the€victimððs€body€in€the€field€near€the€tree€line€€adjacent€to€the€south€side€ofÐ ¨ø ÐWortham.€€Police€also€discovered€multiple€bullet€casings,€both€in€the€road€and€nearÐ tÄ Ðthe€victimððs€body.€€Investigator€Ricky€Chandler€noted€that€the€casings€found€in€theÐ @ Ðroad€had€different€markings€than€those€found€near€the€body.€€Based€upon€hisÐ  \ Ðexperience€with€firearms,€this€indicated€to€him€that€bullets€were€fired€from€twoÐ Ø( Ðdifferent€guns.Ð ¤ô ÐÌà ` àLater€that€night,€officers€arrested€defendants€almost€twenty„three€miles€awayÐ <#Œ" Ðat€Lawrence€Taylorððs€home.€€When€police€surrounded€Taylorððs€home€and€orderedÐ %X $ Ðthe€defendants€to€give€themselves€up,€defendant€Price€came€out€of€the€houseÐ Ô&$"& Ðalmost€immediately;€Smith€refused.€€It€took€law€enforcement€nearly€an€hour€moreÐ  (ð#( Ðto€extricate€defendant€Smith€from€the€house€using€chemical€agents.€€Ultimately,€theyÐ l*¼%* Ðfound€Smith€in€a€back€bedroom€under€the€bed€covers€wearing€a€red€shirt.Ð 8,ˆ', ÐÌà ` àAfter€the€defendantsðð€arrest€and€during€a€gunshot€residue€test€conducted€byÐ Ð/ +0 ÐInvestigator€Chandler,€defendant€Pride€stated,€ð ðI€shot€him,€but€I€didnððt€kill€him.ðð€€Ð œ1ì,2 ÐÌÌà ` àApproximately€one€month€after€the€homicides,€with€the€assistance€ofÐ 7P28 ÐLawrence€Taylorððs€nephew,€investigators€found€the€9„millimeter€FEG€and€the€9„Ð Ì84: ÐÑ P¸Ñâ  âÑ  Ñâ  âÑ  Ñmillimeter€P„38€pistols€involved€in€the€shooting.€€Steve€Scott,€a€forensic€scientistÐ ° Ðwith€the€Tennessee€Bureau€of€Investigation,€conducted€ballistics€tests€using€theÐ |Ì Ðrecovered€guns,€two€bullets€recovered€from€the€body€of€the€victim,€and€shell€casingsÐ H˜ Ðcollected€by€Investigator€Chandler€from€the€field€and€the€street.€€Ð  d ÐÌà ` àAgent€Scottððs€tests€revealed€that€one€shell€casing€definitely€was€fired€from€theÐ ¬ ü  ÐFEG€pistol,€the€other€definitely€from€the€P„38.€€The€bullet€recovered€from€the€victimððsÐ xÈ  Ðleft€shoulder€area€definitely€was€fired€from€the€FEG€pistol;€the€bullet€recovered€fromÐ D”  Ðthe€abdominal€area€could€have€been€fired€from€either€the€FEG€or€the€P„38.Ð ` ÐÌà ` àAt€trial,€defendant€Pride€testified€that€defendant€Smith€initiated€the€startlingÐ ¨ø Ðchain€of€events€when€he€ordered€the€victim€into€the€trunk€of€the€car.€€A€scuffleÐ tÄ Ðensued€between€the€victim€and€defendant€Smith€in€the€front€seat€of€the€car.€€WhenÐ @ Ða€gun€appeared€in€defendant€Smithððs€hand,€the€victim€and€defendant€Pride€exitedÐ  \ Ðthe€driver„side€€of€the€vehicle.€€Ð Ø( ÐÌà ` àAccording€to€defendant€Prideððs€testimony,€defendant€Smith€came€around€toÐ p!À  Ðthe€victimððs€side€of€the€car€and€verbally€continued€the€altercation.€€When€the€victimÐ <#Œ" Ðran€away€toward€the€field€and€tree€line€south€of€Wortham,€defendant€Smith€firedÐ %X $ Ðseveral€shots€in€his€direction.€€The€shots€missed,€and€defendant€Smith€dropped€theÐ Ô&$"& Ðgun€to€the€ground.€€Ð  (ð#( ÐÌà ` àDefendant€Pride€further€testified€that,€immediately€after€defendant€SmithÐ 8,ˆ', Ðdropped€the€gun,€he€picked€it€up€and€continued€firing€at€the€fleeing€victim.€€AskedÐ .T). Ðwhy€he€did€this,€defendant€Pride€stated,€ð ð[b]ecause€I€was€scared€he€was€going€toÐ Ð/ +0 Ðget€away€and€tell€somebody€.€.€.€that€we€tried€to€lock€him€in€the€trunk.ðð€€He€admittedÐ œ1ì,2 Ðthat€one€shot€hit€the€victim€in€the€pelvic€area€and€a€second€shot€hit€the€victim€in€theÐ h3¸.4 Ðarm,€causing€him€to€fall€over€into€the€tree€line.€€Ð 45„06 Ðâ âÐ 7P28 Ðà ` àDefendant€Pride€testified€he€then€got€in€the€driverððs€seat€of€the€victimððs€carÐ ° Ðâ âand€discovered€the€keys€were€not€in€the€ignition.€€In€response€to€his€comment,Ð |Ì Ðð ðMan,€the€keys€gone€(sic),ðð€defendant€Pride€claims€that€a€third€passenger,€theÐ H˜ Ðjuvenile€Robert€Pride,€jumped€out€of€the€car€and€went€to€where€the€victim€layÐ  d Ðscreaming€in€the€field.€€Defendant€Pride€claims€that€Robert€Pride€had€the€secondÐ à 0 Ðgun€and€fired€several€more€shots.€€According€to€defendant€Pride,€the€screamingÐ ¬ ü  Ðstopped€and€Robert€returned€with€the€car€keys.Ð xÈ  ÐÌà ` àRobert€Pride€testified€at€trial€and€admitted€riding€around€with€defendants€andÐ ` Ðthe€victim€in€the€hours€leading€up€to€the€shooting.€€However,€he€denied€anyÐ Ü, Ðinvolvement€in€the€shooting€and€claimed€to€have€gotten€out€of€the€car€before€theyÐ ¨ø Ðreached€the€intersection€of€Simonton€and€Wortham.€€Robert€testified€that€when€Ð tÄ Ðdefendants€picked€him€up€about€an€hour€later€in€the€victimððs€car,€the€victim€was€noÐ @ Ðlonger€with€them€and€there€was€a€gun€in€the€car.€€According€to€Robert,€he€did€notÐ  \ Ðask,€and€defendants€said€nothing,€about€the€victimððs€whereabouts.€Ð Ø( ÐÌà ` àThe€victim€died€as€a€result€of€multiple€gunshot€wounds€from€two€differentÐ p!À  Ðguns.€€The€medical€examiner€testified€that€he€found€eight€entrance€wounds€and€sixÐ <#Œ" Ðexit€wounds€on€the€victimððs€body€and€that€six€of€the€eight€would€have€been€fatal€inÐ %X $ Ðand€of€themselves.€€The€wounds€which€the€medical€examiner€termed€fatal€included:€Ð Ô&$"& Ð(1)€a€shot€to€the€right€arm€which€pierced€the€arm,€re„entered€the€chest,€andÐ  (ð#( Ðperforated€the€right€lung;׃ ×Ý ƒ #ÃÝòòÚ  Ú1Ú  ÚóóÝ  Ý×  ×€(2)€a€shot€just€above€the€left€eye€below€the€brow€which€Ð l*¼%* Ðperforated€the€brain€stem;€and€(3)€a€shot€into€the€victimððs€abdomen€which€perforatedÐ 8,ˆ', Ðthe€colon,€stomach,€left€diaphragm,€and€the€left€lung.׃ v×Ý ƒ #ÃÝòòÚ  Ú2Ú  ÚóóÝ  Ý×  ×Ð .T). ÐÌà ` àDefendant€Smith€did€not€testify€at€trial.Ð œ1ì,2 Ðâ âÐ h3¸.4 ÐÑrÑâ âÑ  Ñâ âÑ  Ñà ` àBased€upon€the€evidence,€the€jury€convicted€both€defendants€ofÐ ° Ðâ âpremeditated€first€degree€murder.Ð |Ì ÐÌà@JJàò òII.€€SUFFICIENCY€OF€THE€EVIDENCEó óˆÐ  d ÐÌà ` àDefendants€Pride€and€Smith€both€challenge€the€sufficiency€of€the€evidenceÐ ¬ ü  Ðupon€which€the€jury€based€its€convictions€for€premeditated€first€degree€murder.€€WeÐ xÈ  Ðfind€this€issue€to€be€without€merit€in€both€cases.Ð D”  ÐÌà@¢¢"àò òA.€€Standards€of€Reviewó óˆÐ Ü, Ðà ` àGreat€weight€is€given€to€the€jury€verdict€in€a€criminal€trial,€ant€it€accredits€theÐ ¨ø Ðstateððs€witnesses€and€resolves€all€conflicts€in€the€stateððs€favor.€€òòState€v.€Bigbeeóó,€885Ð tÄ ÐS.W.2d€797,€803€(Tenn.€1994);€òòState€v.€Harrisóó,€839€S.W.2d€54,€75€(Tenn.€1992).€Ð @ ÐOn€appeal,€the€state€is€entitled€to€the€strongest€legitimate€view€of€the€evidence€andÐ  \ Ðall€reasonable€inferences€which€may€be€drawn€therefrom.€€òòIdóó.;€òòState€v.€Cabbageóó,Ð Ø( Ð571€S.W.2d€832,€835€(Tenn.€1978).€€Furthermore,€a€guilty€verdict€replaces€theÐ ¤ô Ðpresumption€of€innocence€with€a€presumption€of€guilt€which€appellant€mustÐ p!À  Ðovercome€on€appeal.€€òòState€v.€Graceóó,€493€S.W.2d€474,€476€(Tenn.€1973).€€Ð <#Œ" ÐÌà ` àWhere€sufficiency€of€the€evidence€is€challenged,€the€relevant€question€for€anÐ Ô&$"& Ðappellate€court€is€whether,€after€viewing€the€evidence€in€the€light€most€favorable€toÐ  (ð#( Ðthe€prosecution,€any€rational€trier€of€fact€could€have€found€the€essential€elementsÐ l*¼%* Ðof€the€crime€or€crimes€beyond€a€reasonable€doubt.€€Tenn.€R.€App.€P.€13(e);€òòJacksonÐ 8,ˆ', Ðv.€Virginiaóó,€443€U.S.€307,€319,€99€S.Ct.€2781,€2789,€61€L.Ed.2d€560€(1979);€€òòStateÐ .T). Ðv.€Abramsóó,€935€S.W.2d€399,€401€(Tenn.€1996).€€The€weight€and€credibility€of€theÐ Ð/ +0 Ðwitnesses'€testimony€are€matters€entrusted€exclusively€to€the€jury€as€the€triers€ofÐ œ1ì,2 Ðfact.€€òòState€v.€Breweróó,€932€S.W.2d€1,€19€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.€1996);€òòState€v.€Sheffieldóó,Ð h3¸.4 Ð676€S.W.2d€542,€547€(Tenn.€1984).Ð 45„06 ÐÌà ` àThe€applicable€definition€of€first€degree€murder€is,€ð ð[a]€premeditated€andÐ Ì84: ÐÑP¸Ñâ âÑ  Ñâ âÑ  Ñintentional€killing€of€another.ðð€€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€39„13„202(a)(1).€€PremeditationÐ ° Ðnecessitates€ð ða€previously€formed€design€or€intent€to€kill,ðð€òòState€v.€Westóó,€844€S.W.2dÐ |Ì Ð144,€147€(Tenn.€1992)(citations€omitted),€and€ð ðan€act€done€after€the€exercise€ofÐ H˜ Ðreflection€and€judgment€.€.€.€[meaning]€that€the€intent€to€kill€must€have€been€formedÐ  d Ðprior€to€the€act€itself.ðð€€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€39„13„202(d).€€It€also€requires€that€theÐ à 0 Ðaccused€be€ð ðsufficiently€free€from€excitement€and€passion€as€to€be€capable€ofÐ ¬ ü  Ðpremeditation.ðð€òòId.óóÐ xÈ  ÐÌà@||$àò òB.€€Defendant€Prideó óˆÐ ` Ðà@ðð%àò ò1.€€Premeditationó óˆÐ Ü, Ðà ` àDefendant€Pride€claims€the€state€failed€to€prove€the€essential€element€ofÐ ¨ø Ðpremeditation.€€Although€the€jury€may€not€engage€in€speculation,€it€may€inferÐ tÄ Ðpremeditation€from€the€manner€and€circumstances€of€the€killing.€€òòState€v.€Blandóó,€958Ð @ ÐS.W.2d€651,€660€(Tenn.€1997);€òòState€v.€Bordisóó,€905€S.W.2d€214,€222€(Tenn.€Crim.Ð  \ ÐApp.€1995).€€Our€Supreme€Court€delineated€several€circumstances€that€may€beÐ Ø( Ðindicative€of€premeditation,€including€ð ðthe€use€of€a€deadly€weapon€upon€an€unarmedÐ ¤ô Ðvictim€.€.€.€and€calmness€immediately€after€the€killing.ðð€€òòBlandóó,€958€S.W.2d€at€660Ð p!À  Ð(citations€omitted).€€Ð <#Œ" ÐÌà ` àIn€this€instance,€defendant€Pride€testified€that€he€witnessed€an€altercationÐ Ô&$"& Ðbetween€the€victim€and€defendant€Smith.€€That€altercation€resulted€in€defendantÐ  (ð#( ÐSmith€firing€several€missed€shots€at€the€victim.€€When€defendant€Smith€abandonedÐ l*¼%* Ðthe€gun,€defendant€Pride€retrieved€it€and€fired€several€more€shots€at€the€unarmed,Ð 8,ˆ', Ðfleeing€victim€out€of€fear€the€victim€would€tell€someone€they€tried€to€lock€him€in€theÐ .T). Ðtrunk.€€Ð Ð/ +0 ÐÌà ` àUltimately,€defendant€Pride€admitted€in€his€trial€testimony€that€he€inflicted€oneÐ h3¸.4 Ðof€the€shots€the€medical€examiner€termed€ð ðfatalðð€(the€shot€through€the€right€arm€andÐ 45„06 Ðinto€the€chest).€€Furthermore,€trial€testimony€showed€that€immediately€afterward,Ð 7P28 Ðdefendant€Pride€drove€to€his€cousinððs€home€almost€twenty„three€miles€away€andÐ Ì84: Ðproceeded€to€fall€asleep€on€her€couch.€€When€he€awoke,€he€went€to€LawrenceÐ ° ÐTaylorððs€house€in€the€same€neighborhood€and€began€playing€video€games€beforeÐ |Ì Ðthe€police€arrived€and€arrested€him.Ð H˜ ÐÌà ` àThe€issue€of€premeditation€was€a€jury€question.€€Taking€the€evidence€and€allÐ à 0 Ðreasonable€inferences€in€a€light€most€favorable€to€the€state,€this€proof€was€sufficientÐ ¬ ü  Ðfor€a€rational€trier€of€fact€to€find€defendant€Pride€acted€with€premeditation.€€Ð xÈ  ÐÌà ` àThis€contention€is€without€merit.Ð ` ÐÌà@²²'àò ò2.€€Defenses€ˆÐ ¨ø Ðó óà ` àDefendant€Pride€claims€that€the€state€failed€to€carry€its€burden€of€negatingÐ tÄ Ðbeyond€a€reasonable€doubt€his€defenses€of€intoxication€and€causation.Ð @ Ðò òÌà@>>%àa.€€Intoxicationó ó€ò òˆÐ Ø( Ðó óà ` àThe€Tennessee€Criminal€Code€provides€that€ð ðintoxication,€whether€voluntaryÐ ¤ô Ðor€involuntary,€is€admissible€in€evidence€if€it€is€relevant€to€negate€a€culpable€mentalÐ p!À  Ðstate.ðð€€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€39„11„503(a).€€It€is€for€the€jury€to€decide€whether€aÐ <#Œ" Ðdefendant€is€too€intoxicated€to€form€the€requisite€mental€state.€€òòState€v.€Brooksóó,€909€Ð %X $ ÐS.W.2d€854,€859€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.€1995);€òòsee€alsoóó€òòState€v.€Howardóó,€926€S.W.2dÐ Ô&$"& Ð579,€584€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.€1996).Ð  (ð#( Ѐ€Ð l*¼%* Ðà ` àDefendant€Pride€testified€that€he€drank€many€beers,€used€marijuana,€andÐ 8,ˆ', Ðused€cocaine€the€evening€of€the€murder.€€Robert€Prideððs€testimony€confirmed€thisÐ .T). Ðassertion.€€However,€other€witnesses€who€saw€defendant€Pride€over€the€course€of€Ð Ð/ +0 Ðthe€evening€testified€that€he€did€not€appear€intoxicated.€€Lakisha€Barbee€sawÐ œ1ì,2 Ðdefendant€Pride€shortly€after€the€killing€and€testified€that€he€appeared€normal,€i.e.,Ð h3¸.4 Ðdid€not€appear€drunk€or€under€the€influence€of€any€drugs.Ð 45„06 Ðâ âÐ 7P28 ÐÑr Ñâ âÑ  Ñâ âÑ  Ñà ` àWhether€defendant€Pride€was€under€the€influence€of€an€intoxicant€thatÐ ° Ðâ âimpaired€his€ability€to€form€the€requisite€intent€for€first€degree€murder€was€a€classicÐ |Ì Ðquestion€for€the€jury.€€The€jury€found€him€guilty.€€This€Court€may€not€substitute€itsÐ H˜ Ðjudgment€for€that€of€the€jury€relating€to€the€weight€and€credibility€of€the€testimony.€Ð  d ÐÌà ` àThis€contention€is€without€merit.Ð ¬ ü  ÐÌà@kk&àò òà@@kk&àb.€€Causation€€ó óˆÐ D”  Ðà ` àDefendant€Pride€also€contends€that€the€evidence€was€insufficient€to€proveÐ ` Ðthat€the€shots€he€fired€at€the€victim€were€the€shots€that€actually€killed€the€victim.€€Ð Ü, ÐÌà ` àð ðOne€who€unlawfully€inflicts€a€dangerous€wound€upon€another€is€held€for€theÐ tÄ Ðconsequences€flowing€from€such€injury,€whether€the€sequence€be€direct€or€throughÐ @ Ðthe€operation€of€intermediate€agencies€dependent€upon€and€arising€out€of€theÐ  \ Ðoriginal€cause.ðð€€òòState€v.€Ruaneóó,€912€S.W.2d€766,€775€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.Ð Ø( Ð1995)(quoting€òòOdeneal€v.€Stateóó,€157€S.W.€419,€421€(Tenn.€1913)).€€Ð ¤ô ÐÌà ` àThe€medical€examiner€testified€that€the€bullet€that€pierced€the€victimððs€armÐ <#Œ" Ðand€went€into€his€chest€would€have€been€fatal.€€Defendant€Pride€testified€that€heÐ %X $ Ðinflicted€a€wound€to€the€victimððs€arm.€€The€autopsy€report€shows€only€one€wound€toÐ Ô&$"& Ðthe€arm.€€The€most€reasonable€inference€from€the€evidence€is€that€defendant€Pride€Ð  (ð#( Ðinflicted€that€particular€fatal€wound.€€It€is€irrelevant€that€subsequently€inflicted€shotsÐ l*¼%* Ðwould€have€been€more€immediately€fatal.€€Ð 8,ˆ', ÐÌà ` àThis€contention€is€without€merit.Ð Ð/ +0 ÐÌà ` àà@aa$àò òC.€€Defendant€Smithó óˆÐ h3¸.4 Ðà@||'àò òPremeditationó óˆÐ 45„06 Ðà ` àLike€his€co„defendant,€defendant€Smith€contends€that€the€state€failed€toÐ 7P28 Ðprove€that€he€acted€with€premeditation€so€as€to€support€his€conviction€for€firstÐ Ì84: Ðdegree€murder.Ð ° ÐÌà ` àIn€this€instance,€the€proof€showed€that€defendant€Smith€had€an€altercationÐ H˜ Ðwith€the€victim€in€the€victimððs€car.€€When€a€gun€appeared€in€Smithððs€hand,€the€victimÐ  d Ðgot€out€of€the€car.€€Smith€continued€the€altercation€outside,€and€the€victim€tried€toÐ à 0 Ðrun€away.€€Smith€unsuccessfully€fired€several€shots€at€the€fleeing€victim€beforeÐ ¬ ü  Ðdropping€the€gun,€which€defendant€Pride€then€used€to€shoot€the€victim.Ð xÈ  ÐÌà ` àThe€proof€then€indicates€that€when€the€defendants€discovered€the€victim€stillÐ ` Ðhad€the€car€keys,€one€of€them€pursued€the€victim€into€the€tree€line.€€That€personÐ Ü, Ðfired€additional€shots€at€the€victim.€€Those€shots€included€another€immediately€fatalÐ ¨ø Ðwound€to€the€victimððs€head€that€severed€his€brain€stem.Ð tÄ ÐÌà ` àAlthough€the€testimony€regarding€this€second€shooterððs€identity€isÐ  \ Ðcontradictory,€taking€all€evidence€in€the€light€most€favorable€to€the€state,€the€juryÐ Ø( Ðcould€conclude€that€defendant€Smith€was€the€shooter.€€Ð ¤ô ÐÌÌà ` àThe€evidence€shows€that€defendant€Pride€inflicted€the€first€set€of€wounds€andÐ %X $ Ðthen€returned€to€the€victimððs€car.€€He€testified€that€Robert€Pride€then€pursued€theÐ Ô&$"& Ðvictim€into€the€tree€line.€€However,€Robert€Pride€testified€that€he€was€not€present.€Ð  (ð#( ÐMichelle€Johnson€testified€that€she€saw€only€the€victim€and€defendants€Pride€andÐ l*¼%* ÐSmith.€€Lane€Howard€testified€that€she€saw€a€man€wearing€a€red€shirt€standing€inÐ 8,ˆ', Ðthe€tree€line.€€Defendant€Smith€wore€a€red€shirt.Ð .T). ÐÌà ` àAgain,€this€evidence€in€the€light€most€favorable€to€the€state€is€sufficient€toÐ œ1ì,2 Ðsupport€the€juryððs€conclusion€that€defendant€Smith€pursued€the€victim€into€the€treeÐ h3¸.4 Ðline;€shot€the€victim€numerous€times€at€point€blank€range;€and€thus€acted€withÐ 45„06 Ðpremeditation.€€Ð 7P28 ÐÐ Ì84: Ðà ` àThis€issue€is€without€merit.Ð ° ÐÌà ` àà@--&àò òIII.€€VIDEOTAPEó óˆÐ H˜ ÐÌà ` àFinally,€defendant€Pride€charges€as€error€the€trial€courtððs€refusal€to€suppressÐ à 0 Ðthe€videotape€of€the€crime€scene€and€arrests.€€He€claims€the€video€was€irrelevantÐ ¬ ü  Ðand€prejudicial.Ð xÈ  ÐÌà ` àWe€first€note€that€the€defendant€waived€this€issue€as€the€record€does€notÐ ` Ðcontain€a€copy€of€the€videotape€in€question.€€It€is€the€duty€of€the€accused€to€provideÐ Ü, Ða€record€which€conveys€a€fair,€accurate€and€complete€account€of€what€transpiredÐ ¨ø Ðwith€regard€to€the€issues€which€form€the€basis€of€the€appeal.€Tenn.€R.€App.€R.€24(b);Ð tÄ Ðòòseeóó€òòState€v.€Tayloróó,€992€S.W.2d€941,€944€(Tenn.€1999).€€Nevertheless,€we€addressÐ @ Ðthe€issue€based€upon€the€the€trial€courtððs€findings€of€fact€relating€to€the€contents€ofÐ  \ Ðthe€videotape.€€Ð Ø( ÐÌÌà ` àAdmissibility€of€crime€scene€videotapes€is€within€the€discretion€of€the€trialÐ <#Œ" Ðcourt.€€To€overturn€the€trial€judgeððs€ruling€regarding€the€admissibility€of€such€a€tape€Ð %X $ Ðrequires€us€to€find€an€abuse€of€discretion.€€òòState€v.€Bigbeeóó,€885€S.W.2d€797,€807Ð Ô&$"& Ð(Tenn.€1994);€òòState€v.€Van€Tranóó,€864€S.W.2d€465,€477€(Tenn.€1993).€Ð  (ð#( ÐÌà ` àUpon€defendant€Prideððs€objection€to€the€videotape€at€trial,€the€trial€courtÐ 8,ˆ', Ðconducted€a€jury„out€hearing€before€ruling€on€its€admissibility.€€The€trial€court€viewedÐ .T). Ðthe€tape€and€determined€that€portions€of€the€crime€scene€and€the€victimððs€body€wereÐ Ð/ +0 Ðadmissible€for€the€purpose€of€demonstrating€the€location€of€the€shell€casingsÐ œ1ì,2 Ðrecovered€by€Investigator€Chandler.€€The€trial€court€ordered€that€the€state€forwardÐ h3¸.4 Ðpast€the€long€views€of€the€victimððs€face€and€body€close„up,€but€determined€thatÐ 45„06 Ðnothing€else€in€the€video€was€unduly€prejudicial.€€Ð 7P28 ÐÐ Ì84: Ðà ` àWith€regard€to€the€arrest€scene,€it€is€clear€that€the€tape€was€relevant€to€showÐ ° Ðdefendant€Smithððs€attire€(i.e.,€the€red€shirt).€€The€fact€that€defendants€may€haveÐ |Ì Ðbeen€shown€being€led€away€from€the€scene€in€handcuffs€would€not€be€undulyÐ H˜ Ðprejudicial€in€light€of€the€tapeððs€probative€value.Ð  d ÐÌà ` àThe€trial€court€did€not€abuse€its€discretion€in€admitting€the€videotape.€€ThisÐ ¬ ü  Ðissue€is€without€merit.Ð xÈ  ÐÌà@ÅÅ&àò òIV.€€CONCLUSIONó óˆÐ ` ÐÌà ` àBased€upon€the€foregoing,€we€ò òAFFIRMó ó€the€judgment€of€the€trial€court€in€allÐ ¨ø Ðrespects.Ð tÄ ÐÌÌÓÓÌÌÌÌÌà€èè/(#à____________________________ˆÐ V"¦! Ðà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  àà p àò òJOE€G.€RILEY,€JUDGEó óÐ <#Œ" ÐÌÌÌò òCONCUR:Ð Ô&$"& ÐÌÌó óÌ___________________________ò òÐ l*¼%* ÐDAVID€G.€HAYES,€JUDGEÐ R+¢&+ ÐÌÌÌó ó____________________________ò òÐ ê.:*/ ÐTHOMAS€T.€WOODALL,€JUDGEó ó