WPCf I',WZ[:2 glk|@jc?4nF,A{#i ful‡KS*k/(y`_uW+ޢM\3Pp"Os]Zx'/$ }pf554Laϸfs,T2mF( Cq^svP :PccƄsa.-scVTryj$8X$dyxU7R*^vUd ̻gGm+go1J6MThe>vF m@Ҫ$?M nl90F@F/hPnNjV鏌ׁȮSܱ>ќvP8VH u ,<)A\Ovz"Ŧ,cNgU Kvx١q MFp=76S0B7v nZx$t?q;~kjb#\ % UN# 0q UN ^ G wS zW  4   m   k 11NE 0Db[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[ 0cccc BNN 0k D3 D-B 0Koo AS  0 0Dw AHP LaserJet 4000 Series PCL 60(hH  Z6Times New Roman Regular(`$.8dd8    ("  Z6Times New Roman Regular(  C:\PROGRA~1\COREL\WORDPE~1\TEMPLATE\CUSTOM~1\REVISE~1.WPTC:\Program Files\Corel\WordPerfect Office 2000\Template\Custom WP Templates\revised standard opinion.wptJ~'2k2,3|xULevel 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5  R$      1  '  _TheapplicablerangeforaRangeIstandardoffenderinaClassBfelonyiseighttotwelveyears.See4035  112(2)(#$  0  - -(|G2$ !.8Pdd8         0  ' d(|3$ !.8Pdd8     VVVV'dxd)!dxdx( $ Figure  1  ^_X`YE<<CLevel 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5(|3$ !.8Pdd8     ($$   1  X[Z&OLE 2.0 Box <=8C HKKKK !.8Pdd8     _   P8)XXdd8@tt{PINTHECOURTOFCRIMINALAPPEALSOFTENNESSEE  @kk$ATNASHVILLE#P{ #Ԉ      @  @` April2000Session @ X)XP #PXX)#STATEOFTENNESSEEv.CHRISTOPHERKEVIN_PADGETT_X)XP  4 @@ DirectAppealfromtheCircuitCourtforPutnamCounty  ( @@No.970289BLeonBurns,Jr.,Judge   @@*AV) ` dE<o` A p  @@TTNo.M200000038CCAR3CDFiledJuly28,_2000_ e  AV) ` dE<0` A 1     TheDefendant,ChristopherKevin_Padgett_,wasfoundguiltybyaPutnamCountyjuryoftheoffense &v  ofaggravatedrobbery.HewassentencedasaRangeIstandardoffendertoelevenyears  \ incarceration.Inthisappeal#PXX)#X)XP,theDefendantchallengesthesentencesimposed.Weaffirmthe B judgmentofthetrialcourt.#PXX)#X)XP (  Tenn.R.App.P.3AppealasofRight;JudgmentoftheCircuitCourtAffirmed.     #PX)#X)X.PRobertW.Wedemeyer,J.,deliveredtheopinionofthecourt,inwhichSmith,J.andWilliams, p J.,joined. V CraigP._Fickling_,_Cookeville_,Tennessee,fortheappellant,ChristopherKevin_Padgett_. "r PaulG.Summers,AttorneyGeneralandReporter,JenniferL._Bledsoe_,AssistantAttorneyGeneral, > WilliamE.Gibson,DistrictAttorneyGeneral,BenjaminW._Fann_,AssistantDistrictAttorney $ General,andDavidA.Patterson,AssistantDistrictAttorneyGeneralfortheappellee,Stateof   Tennessee.  @@OO& OPINION #PXX)#X)XP l!! #PXX)K #X)XP    TheproofattrialestablishedthatinFebruary1997,James_Phipps_ԀwenttoBud'sTavernin 8## _Cookeville_,Tennesseetoeatdinnerandplaysomepool.WhileatBud's,_Phipps_ԀmettheDefendant, $n$ ChristopherKevin_Padgett_.Althoughthetwohadnotmetpriortothatevening,theybegantoplay %T % pooltogether.Approximatelyanhourlater,_Phipps_ԀgavetheDefendantaridetohismobilehome %:!& locatedashortdistanceaway.Uponarrivingatthemobilehome,theDefendantimmediatelyleft & "' andreturnedwithhisneighbor,_Ricky_ԀLynnRandolph.Therewassomedisputeattrialastowhat '#( happenednext._Phipps_Ԁtestifiedthatonceinthetrailer,theDefendantwenttothekitchen,whichwas (#) locatedatoneendofthetrailer,andasked_Phipps_Ԁtojoinhim.Accordingto_Phipps_,beforehegot )$* tothekitchen,theDefendanthithimintheheadandthenbegantobeathimwithablackstick. h*%+ _Phipps_ԀthentestifiedthattheDefendantinsistedthat_Phipps_Ԁgivehimhiswalletwhereuponthe N+&, Defendanttookoutallofthecashandgavethewalletbackto_Phipps_.Testimonycorroborating 4,'- _Phipps_Ԁallegationswasofferedby_Ricky_ԀLynnRandolphandtwoneighborhoodboys.The -j(. _DefendantdeniedeverdemandingortakinganymoneyfromPhippsandstatedthatthefightensued  becausePhippswantedsomemarijuana,andtheDefendantwouldnotprovideany.Later,Phipps  wastakenbyambulancetotheCookevilleRegionalMedicalCenterwherehewastreatedforhis | injuries. b   Basedonthisevidence,thejuryconvictedtheDefendantofaggravatedrobbery,aClassB . ~ felony.SeeTenn.CodeAnn.3913402.TheDefendantwassentencedasaRangeIstandard  d offendertoelevenyearsincarceration,whichisoneyearlessthanthemaximumintheapplicable  J range. )#  1      ׀TheDefendantchallengesthelengthofthesentenceimposedbythetrialcourt.   0 X)XXX)  Whenanaccusedchallengesthelength,range,ormannerofserviceofasentence,the    reviewingcourtmustconductadenovoreviewofthesentencewithapresumptionthatthe   determinationsmadebythetrialcourtarecorrect.See.Tenn.CodeAnn.4035401(d).This x  presumption,however, isconditionedupontheaffirmativeshowingintherecordthatthetrialcourt ^  consideredthesentencingprinciplesandallrelevantfactsandcircumstances.Statev.Ashby,823 D  S.W.2d166,169(Tenn.1991).Intheeventthattherecordfailstoshowsuchconsideration,the *z  reviewofthesentenceispurelydenovo.Id."Theburdenofshowingthatthesentenceisimproper ` isupontheappellant."Id.Ifappellatereviewreflectsthetrialcourtproperlyconsideredallrelevant F factorsanditsfindingsoffactareadequatelysupportedbytherecord,thisCourtmustaffirmthe , sentence,"evenifwewouldhavepreferredadifferentresult."Statev.Fletcher,805S.W.2d785,  789(Tenn.Crim.App.1991).    Inmakingitssentencingdetermination,thetrialcourt,attheconclusionofthesentencing t hearing,determinestherangeofsentenceandthendeterminesthespecificsentenceandthepropriety Z ofsentencingalternativesbyconsidering(1)theevidence,ifany,receivedatthetrialandthe @ sentencinghearing,(2)thepresentencereport,(3)theprinciplesofsentencingandargumentsasto &v sentencingalternatives,(4)thenatureandcharacteristicsofthecriminalconductinvolved,(5)  \ evidenceandinformationofferedbythepartiesontheenhancementandmitigatingfactors,(6)any B statementsthedefendantwishestomakeinthedefendant'sbehalfaboutsentencing,and(7)the ( potentialforrehabilitationortreatment.SeeTenn.CodeAnn.4035210(a),(b),103(5);State  v.Holland,860S.W.2d53,60(Tenn.Crim.App.1993).    Thepresumptivesentencetobeimposedbythetrialcourtistheminimumwithinthe p!  applicablerangeunlessthereareenhancementormitigatingfactorspresent.Tenn.CodeAnn.40 V"! 35210(c).Ifthereareenhancementormitigatingfactors,thecourtmuststartattheminimum <#" sentenceintherangeandenhancethesentenceasappropriatefortheenhancementfactorsandthen "$r# reducethesentencewithintherangeasappropriateformitigatingfactors.Id.4035210(d),(e). %X $ Theweighttobegiveneachfactorislefttothediscretionofthetrialjudge.Statev.Shelton,_854 %>!% S.W.2d116,123(Tenn.Crim.App.1992).However,thesentencemustbeadequatelysupported &$"&  bytherecordandcomplywiththepurposesandprinciplesofthe1989SentencingReformAct. ' #' Tenn.CodeAnn.4035210sentencing_comm'n_Ԁcmts.;Statev.Moss,727S.W.2d229,237(Tenn.  1986).     Whenimposingasentence,thestatuterequiresthatthetrialrecordcontainspecificfindings b offactuponwhichthesentenceisbased,aswellasanyenhancementormitigatingfactorsusedto H arriveatthatsentence.Tenn.CodeAnn.4035209(c),210(f).Thus,ifthetrialcourtwishes . ~ toenhanceasentence,thecourtmuststateitsreasonsontherecord.Thepurposeofrecordingthe  d courtsreasoningistoguaranteethepreparationofaproperrecordforappellatereview.Statev.  J Ervin,939S.W.2d581,584(_Tenn.Crim.App_.1996).#X)XXX)#Becausetherecordinthiscaseindicatesthat  0 thetrialcourtadequatelyconsideredtheenhancementandmitigatingfactorsaswellasthe    underlyingfacts,ourreviewisdenovowithapresumptionofcorrectness.      Inthiscase,thecourtfoundthefollowingenhancementfactorsapplied:(1)Defendanthas x  aprevioushistoryofcriminalconvictionsorcriminalbehaviorinadditiontothosenecessaryto ^  establishtheappropriaterange,and(8)Defendanthasaprevioushistoryofunwillingnesstocomply D  withtheconditionsofasentenceinvolvingreleaseinthecommunity.SeeTenn.CodeAnn.4035 *z  114(1),(8).Thecourtfoundnomitigatingfactors. ` __  TheDefendantcontendsthatthetrialcourtdidnotmakespecificfindingsoffacttosupport , itsdecisionconcerningsentencingandthusthatitsdeterminationsdonotwarranttheusual  presumptionofcorrectness.However,thetrialcourtdidconsidertherelevantfactsand  circumstances,includingthenatureoftheoffense.Thetrialcourtproperlyincreasedthelengthof  thesentence,withintherange,basedonthepresenceoftwoenhancementfactorsandnomitigating t factors.Thetrialcourtfoundthatthedefendant'shistoryofpriorconvictionsandhistoryof Z unwillingnesstocomplywiththeconditionsofhisreleasewarrantedtheincreaseinthelengthof @ thesentence,fromeighttoelevenyears. &v   Thetrialcourt'sfindingsweresupportedbytheintroductionintoevidenceofcertifiedcopies B oftheDefendant'sfivepriorconvictions.TheseincludedaguiltypleaonJune25,1993todriving ( onasuspendedlicenseandsimplepossessionofmarijuana.Theevidenceatthesentencinghearing  alsodemonstratedthattheDefendantpleadedguiltyonMay30,1995toautoburglary,attempted  theft,andaggravatedburglaryandthatthedefendantservedathreeyeartermonCommunity   Corrections,whichwaslaterrevoked. p!    Weconcludethatthetrialcourtappropriatelyappliedtwoenhancementfactorswhen <#" sentencingtheDefendant.Wealsoconcludethatthetrialcourtwascorrectinfindingnomitigating "$r# factorsinthiscase.Thus,thesentenceimposedbythetrialcourtwasproper. %X $   Accordingly,thesentenceimposedbythetrialcourtisAFFIRMED.#PXX) #X)XP &$"&    `     h     ___________________________________ l*%*    `     h     ROBERTW.WEDEMEYER,JUDGE