ÿWPCø .^Û£æ®ÐL/a½¥ùª›'ð7g ­ã§»à³þ»WùÑ<ˆ·ÛGÓ½ õ-çæ(¸Jm€h5¢ô„âM,’£'éÐ5ü³ìäv®0Í5–,ÈÜë Bƒ³"ŽÐœ‰Í`ì=<ì,'pA7qºÛ ž|!ɽ$S4êv=¦ôKéýÿÓ#Iº“T{ºØæÑ»&˼kèvw;×)VÂ1FËZj×ãAÁ\b§ÇÝ4¢ÒCDCþfò–qÍá,¸Ñº$ñÊß¹^%Ÿ£ƒ>GÚÎÁ¶~Ø,­¡ëÝ8¾Gv<ÁS#­¨ãbIê}ðb´œ:q5Põ.¾‡ÏZä 0(ÃOŠwE!Bþ›®#’ž0¢¹0+  SÎFÑ“ÛbÆÆMï ?u  ƪuí`=Ìì5¾*K*ÿ[=#¿<®çŠGG™ñŸß¾vÇ Po}×x‘P£¥üã¸úó9 »ÖÊ÷O#ïïFÁ Ð>ž˜o¼ÀѽÉ%âÔŠ® ‚½–øE^r]Ÿ‚ò—{ÈùCÆó»Û63…€|y=ë÷G¥³§{†«éb %\U@b 0Ÿ¢U!NAUN^ Ýwé zíÒg 49 M \ m^ Æu Æ; Æ ÆÇ  N• #Á— — EXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX D1ZZ B‹‹‹‹‹‹‹b¨¨¨¨¨¨¨¨¨¨¨¨¨¨¨¨¨¨¨¨¨¨¨¨¨¨¨¨¨¨¨¨¨¨¨¨ 0°°°° B²² 0»Ï D3Š D-½ 0Kêê AS5ƈ 0»N 0D  A«M»(ƒð Z‹(Times New Roman (wÖ½$¡¡Ô  ÔÑ  ÑÑ€..ÑÑ8€ »»dXXdì8ÑÑ ýý ÑÓ  Ó(í€"  Z6Times New Roman Regular(ÖÃ9 Z ‹6Times New Roman RegularM¬)L  ˜C:\PROGRA~1\COREL\WORDPE~1\TEMPLATE\CUSTOM~1\REVISE~1.WPTC:\Program Files\Corel\WordPerfect Office 2000\Template\Custom WP Templates\revised standard opinion.wpt¬sp'¢Ø+003|xÿU‹ÿÀÀÀLevel 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5‚Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5„Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5…Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5 ˜HP LaserJet 4000 Series PCL 6ÈÈÈÈÈÈÈÈ0'')÷ÿ! dxdxüÿP Pd- ù-(“G2 G$¤¤Ý ƒÖ½!ÝÔ  ÔÑ  ÑÑ€.ÑÑ8€€»»dd8ÑÑ ý ÑÓ  ÓÝ  Ýà  àòòÚ  Ú0Ú  ÚóóÔ€ôd¤ò»»Ô d(“3Õ—$££Ý ƒÖ½!ÝÔ  ÔÑ  ÑÑ€.ÑÑ8€€»»dd8ÑÑ ý ÑÓ  ÓÝ  ÝVVVV'ÿÿdxd)!ÈÈÈÈdxdx( ±þ$’’ò òFigure€Ú  Ú1Ú  Úó ó^_X`YEþÿ<<CÿÿƒLevel 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5(“3Õ—$¢¢Ý ƒÖ½!ÝÔ  ÔÑ  ÑÑ€.ÑÑ8€€»»dd8ÑÑ ý ÑÓ  ÓÝ  Ý($$””ò òÚ  Ú1Ú  Úó óX[Z&OLE 2.0 Box <=8ÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿCÿÿ HKKKKÝ ƒÖ½!ÝÔ  ÔÑ  ÑÑ€.ÑÑ8€€»»ddÈ8ÑÑ ý ÑÓ  ÓÝ  ÝÔ_ÔÔ_ÔÑ  ÑÔ€¼€»»»ÔÑ8€hLXXdæ»»d8Ñà@ttìàÔ‡î6Ó€ÔIN€THE€COURT€OF€CRIMINAL€APPEALS€OF€TENNESSEEˆÐ ° Ðà@õõ%ìàAT€JACKSONÔ#†¼€»îî6Ó'#ԈРР ÐÓ  Óà @ àà @` àJuly€2000€SessionÐ ð@ ÐÔ‡XhLX»¼€ÔÌò òÔ#†¼€»XXhL(#ÔJIMMY€ROGERS€vs.€STATE€OF€TENNESSEEÔ‡XhLX»¼€Ôó óÐ ä4 ÐÌà@@½½ìàò ò€Appeal€from€the€Criminal€Court€for€Shelby€CountyÐ Ø ( Ðà@@øøìàNo.€P„17811€€€€€€John€P.€Ô_ÔColtonÔ_Ô,€Jr.,€JudgeÐ ¾  ÐÌÌà@@ìì*ìàßA€V) °°` d€÷E<o` AßÐ pÀ  ÐÌà@@TTìàNo.€W1999„1453„CCA„R3„PC€„€Decided€August€22,€Ô_Ô2000Ô_ÔÐ eµ  ÐÌßA€V) °°` dE<0` AßÐ 1  Ðó óÌÓ  ÓThe€Defendant,€Jimmy€Rogers,€appeals€as€of€right€from€the€trial€court's€denial€of€post„convictionÐ &v  Ðrelief€after€an€evidentiary€hearing.€€On€appeal,€he€argues€that€the€trial€court€erred€by€finding€that€heÐ  \ Ðreceived€effective€assistance€of€counsel€at€the€trial€level€and€by€finding€that€his€guilty€pleas€wereÐ òB Ðvoluntarily€and€knowingly€made.€€We€find€no€error.€€Accordingly,€we€affirm€the€judgment€of€the€trialÐ Ø( Ðcourt€denying€the€Defendant's€petition€for€post„conviction€relief.Ð ¾ ÐÓÕÓÌò òTenn.€R.€App.€3€Appeal€as€of€Right;€Judgment€of€the€Criminal€Court€Affirmed.ó óÐ ŠÚ ÐÌòòÓ  ÓÔ#†¼€»àXhL‘#ÔÔ‡XhLX.¼€ÔDavid€H.€Welles,€J.óó,€delivered€the€opinion€of€the€court,€in€which€òòAlan€E.€Glenn,€J.,óó€and€òòCorneliaÐ V¦ ÐA.€Clark,€Sp.€J.óó,€joined.Ð <Œ ÐÌRobert€B.€Gaia,€Memphis,€Tennessee,€for€the€appellant,€Jimmy€Rogers.Ð X ÐÌPaul€G.€Summers,€Attorney€General€and€Reporter;€Kim€R.€Helper,€Assistant€Attorney€General;Ð Ô$ ÐWilliam€Gibbons,€District€Attorney€General;€Perry€Hayes,€Assistant€District€Attorney€General,€forÐ º  Ðthe€appellee,€State€of€Tennessee.Ð  ð ÐÓšÓÌà@@OO&ìàò òOPINIONó óÔ#†¼€»XXhLÉ#ÔÔ‡XhLX»¼€ÔÐ l!¼! ÐÌÔ#†¼€»XXhLd #ÔÔ‡XhLX»¼€ÔÓ  Óà  àThe€Defendant,€Jimmy€Rogers,€was€indicted€for€first€degree€murder,€attempted€especiallyÐ 8#ˆ# Ðaggravated€robbery,€attempted€aggravated€robbery,€and€four€counts€of€aggravated€robbery.€€PursuantÐ $n$ Ðto€a€negotiated€plea€agreement,€the€Defendant€pleaded€guilty€on€September€30,€1996€to€the€lesserÐ %T % Ðincluded€offense€of€second€degree€murder,€for€which€he€received€a€twenty„five€year€sentence;€theÐ ê%:!& Ðoffense€of€attempted€especially€aggravated€robbery,€for€which€he€received€an€eight€year€sentence;Ð Ð& "' Ðthe€offense€of€attempted€aggravated€robbery,€for€which€he€received€a€three€year€sentence;€and€fourÐ ¶'#( Ðcounts€of€the€offense€of€aggravated€robbery,€for€which€he€received€an€eight€year€sentence€for€eachÐ œ(ì#) Ðcount.€€All€sentences€were€to€be€served€concurrently.Ð ‚)Ò$* ÐÌà  àSubsequently,€the€Defendant€filed€a€petition€for€post„conviction€relief€alleging,€among€otherÐ N+ž&, Ðthings,€that€his€counsel€was€ineffective€for€not€requesting€a€mental€evaluation€prior€to€allowing€theÐ 4,„'- ÐDefendant€to€enter€the€guilty€pleas.€€He€also€alleged€that€his€pleas€were€not€knowingly€andÐ -j(.ý ÐÔ_Ôvoluntarily€entered€because€his€counsel€told€him€that€he€would€be€eligible€for€parole€after€servingÐ ° Ðthirty€percent€of€his€twenty„five€year€sentence€for€second€degree€murder,€rather€than€one€hundredÐ –æ Ðpercent€of€that€sentence.€€After€an€evidentiary€hearing,€the€trial€court€found€that€the€Defendant's€trialÐ |Ì Ðcounsel€was€effective€and€that€the€pleas€were€voluntarily€and€knowingly€entered;€therefore,€it€deniedÐ b² Ðrelief.€€We€agree€with€the€findings€of€the€trial€court€and€affirm€its€judgment.Ð H˜ ÐÌÔ‡XhLXXXhLÔà  àThe€Defendant€first€argues€that€he€should€be€granted€post„conviction€relief€because€his€trialÐ  d Ðcounsel€was€ineffective.€€Relief€under€our€Post„Conviction€Procedure€Act€will€be€granted€when€theÐ ú J Ðconviction€or€sentence€is€void€or€voidable€because€of€the€abridgement€of€any€right€guaranteed€byÐ à 0 Ðeither€the€Tennessee€Constitution€or€the€United€States€Constitution.€€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€40„30„203.€Ð Æ   ÐIn€òòGideon€v.€Wainwrightóó,€372€U.S.€335€(1963),€the€Supreme€Court€held€that€the€Sixth€AmendmentÐ ¬ ü  Ðright€to€counsel€was€"'so€fundamental€and€essential€to€a€fair€trial€.€.€.€that€it€is€made€obligatory€uponÐ ’â  Ðthe€States€by€the€Fourteenth€Amendment.'"€€òòId.óó€at€340€(quoting€òòBetts€v.€Bradyóó,€316€U.S.€455,€465Ð xÈ  Ð(1942)).€€This€right€to€counsel€includes€the€right€to€effective€counsel.€€òòStrickland€v.€Washingtonóó,€466Ð ^®  ÐU.S.€668,€686€(1984).Ð D”  ÐÌà  àÔ#†XhLXXXhL6#ÔÔ‡XhLXXXhLÔTo€determine€whether€counsel€provided€effective€assistance€at€trial,€the€court€must€decideÐ ` Ðwhether€counselððs€performance€was€within€the€range€of€competence€demanded€of€attorneys€inÐ öF Ðcriminal€cases.€€òòBaxter€v.€Roseóó,€523€S.W.2d€930,€936€(Tenn.€1975).€€To€succeed€on€a€claim€thatÐ Ü, Ðcounsel€was€ineffective€at€trial,€a€petitioner€bears€the€burden€of€showing€that€his€or€her€counsel€madeÐ Â Ðerrors€so€serious€that€he€or€she€was€not€functioning€as€counsel€as€guaranteed€under€the€SixthÐ ¨ø ÐAmendment€and€that€the€deficient€representation€prejudiced€the€petitioner,€resulting€in€a€failure€toÐ ŽÞ Ðproduce€a€reliable€result.€€òòStricklandóó,€466€U.S.€at€687òòóó;€òòCooper€v.€Stateóó,€849€S.W.2d€744,€747€(Tenn.Ð tÄ Ð1993);€òòButler€v.€Stateóó,€789€S.W.2d€898,€899€(Tenn.€1990).€€To€satisfy€the€second€prong,€theÐ Zª Ðpetitioner€must€show€a€reasonable€probability€that,€but€for€counselððs€unreasonable€error,€the€factÐ @ Ðfinder€would€have€had€reasonable€doubt€regarding€petitionerððs€guilt.€€òòStricklandóó,€466€U.S.€at€695.€Ð &v ÐThis€reasonable€probability€must€be€ð ðsufficient€to€undermine€confidence€in€the€outcome.ðð€€òòHarrisÐ  \ Ðv.€Stateóó,€875€S.W.2d€662,€665€(Tenn.€1994).Ð òB ÐÌà  àThis€two€part€standard€of€measuring€ineffective€assistance€of€counsel€also€applies€to€claimsÐ ¾ Ðarising€out€of€the€plea€process.€€òòHill€v.€Lockhartóó,€474€U.S.€52,€58€(1985).€€The€prejudice€requirementÐ ¤ô Ðis€modified€so€that€the€petitioner€ð ðmust€show€that€there€is€a€reasonable€probability€that,€but€forÐ Š Ú Ðcounselððs€errors€he€would€not€have€pleaded€guilty€and€would€have€insisted€on€going€to€trial.ðð€€òòId.óó€atÐ p!À  Ð59.Ô#†XhLXXXhLŒ#ÔÔ‡XhLXXXhLÔÐ V"¦! ÐÌÔ#†XhLXXXhLM#ÔÔ‡XhLXXXhLÔà  àWhen€reviewing€trial€counselððs€actions,€this€Court€should€not€use€the€benefit€of€hindsight€toÐ "$r# Ðsecond„guess€trial€strategy€and€criticize€counselððs€tactics.€€òòHellard€v.€Stateóó,€629€S.W.2d€4,€9€(Tenn.Ð %X $ Ð1982).€€Counselððs€alleged€errors€should€be€judged€at€the€time€they€were€made€in€light€of€all€facts€andÐ î%>!% Ðcircumstances.€€òòStricklandóó,€466€U.S.€at€690;€òòseeóó€òòCooperóó€849€S.W.2d€at€746.Ð Ô&$"& ÐÔ#†XhLXXXhL¥#ÔÔ‡XhLXXXhLÔÔ#†¼€»XXhL¼ #ÔÔ‡XhLX»¼€ÔÌà  àÔ#†XhLXXXhLÛ #ÔÔ‡XhLXXXhLÔIf€afforded€a€post-conviction€evidentiary€hearing€by€the€trial€court,€a€petitioner€must€do€moreÐ  (ð#( Ðthan€merely€present€evidence€tending€to€show€incompetent€representation€and€prejudice;€he€or€sheÐ †)Ö$) Ðmust€prove€factual€allegations€by€clear€and€convincing€evidence.€€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€40-30-210(f).€Ð l*¼%* Ðâ âWhen€an€evidentiary€hearing€is€held,€findings€of€fact€made€by€that€court€are€conclusive€and€bindingÐ R+¢&+ Ðon€this€Court€unless€the€evidence€preponderates€against€them.€€òòÔ#†XhLXXXhLl!#ÔÔ‡XhLXXXhLÔTidwell€v.€Stateóó,€922€S.W.2d€497,Ð ° Ð500€(Tenn.€1996);Ô#†XhLXXXhLÕ##ÔÔ‡XhLXXXhLÔ€òòCooperóó,€849€S.W.2d€at€746€(citing€òòButleróó,€789€S.W.2d€at€899).Ð –æ Ðâ âÔ#†XhLXXXhLa$#ÔÔ#†¼€»XXhL!#ÔÔ‡XhLX»¼€Ô€€Ô#†¼€»XXhL/%#ÔÔ€XhLX»¼€ÔÐ |Ì Ðà  àThe€Defendant€argues€that€his€trial€counsel€was€ineffective€for€failing€to€request€a€mentalÐ b² Ðevaluation€for€him€because€counsel€knew€that€he€received€a€stab€wound€to€his€head€immediatelyÐ H˜ Ðprior€to€the€events€giving€rise€to€the€indictments€and€because€counsel€knew€he€had€previouslyÐ . ~ Ðreceived€mental€health€treatment.€€Medical€records€introduced€at€the€evidentiary€hearing€showed€thatÐ  d Ðthe€Defendant€did€receive€a€wound€to€the€head€on€the€day€before€the€murder.€€He€was€treated€withÐ ú J Ðstitches€and€pain€medication€and€released€the€same€day,€after€being€told€to€return€in€seven€days€toÐ à 0 Ðhave€the€stitches€removed.€€The€medical€records€showed€that€the€Defendant€did€not€have€aÐ Æ   Ðconcussion.€€John€Hough,€Jr.,€the€Defendant's€trial€counsel,€testified€that€he€knew€about€the€stabÐ ¬ ü  Ðwound,€but€that€it€was€just€a€"superficial"€wound.€€Mr.€Hough€also€testified€that€he€knew€theÐ ’â  ÐDefendant€had€been€previously€treated€in€the€hospital€for€a€suicide€attempt,€but€that€the€DefendantÐ xÈ  Ðwas€again€treated€and€released;€he€was€not€treated€for€a€mental€heath€problem.€€No€medical€recordsÐ ^®  Ðfrom€this€incident€were€included€in€the€record.€€Mr.€Hough€said€that€the€Defendant€was€cognizantÐ D”  Ðof€what€he€was€doing,€that€he€seemed€logical,€and€that€"there€was€never€any€question€in€my€mind€thatÐ *z  Ðthis€injury€the€day€before€the€murder€would€have€caused€any€problems€with€him."€€He€€testified,€"IÐ ` Ðdidn't€see€any€indications€of€any€incompetency€in€him€at€all."€Ð öF ÐÌà  àBased€on€Mr.€Hough's€testimony€and€the€medical€records€in€the€file,€the€trial€courtÐ Â Ðdetermined€that€the€Defendant's€claims€of€ineffective€assistance€for€failure€to€pursue€a€mentalÐ ¨ø Ðevaluation€were€without€merit.€€As€stated€by€Mr.€Hough,€there€is€"nothing€in€those€[medical]€recordsÐ ŽÞ Ðto€indicate€that€there€was€anything€wrong€with€him€other€than€two€or€three€sutures€in€his€head."€Ð tÄ ÐWithout€any€indications€that€the€Defendant€was€incompetent€or€suffering€from€mental€illness,€weÐ Zª Ðdo€not€see€how€it€could€have€been€ineffective€assistance€for€Mr.€Hough€to€proceed€withoutÐ @ Ðrequesting€a€mental€evaluation.€€Accordingly,€we€conclude€that€the€evidence€does€not€preponderateÐ &v Ðagainst€the€trial€court's€finding€that€the€Defendant's€trial€counsel€was€not€deficient€in€the€performanceÐ  \ Ðof€his€duties.Ð òB ÐÌà  àThe€Defendant€next€argues€that€his€guilty€pleas€were€not€voluntarily€and€knowingly€enteredÐ ¾ Ðbecause€he€believed€that€he€would€be€eligible€for€parole€after€serving€thirty€percent€of€his€twenty„fiveÐ ¤ô Ðyear€sentence,€rather€than€one€hundred€percent.€€Ô‡XhLXXXhLÔThe€United€States€Supreme€Court€has€said€that,€inÐ Š Ú Ðorder€to€pass€constitutional€muster,€a€guilty€plea€must€be€voluntarily,€understandingly,€andÐ p!À  Ðintelligently€entered.€€òòSeeóó€òòBrady€v.€United€Statesóó,€397€U.S.€742,€747€n.4€(1970);€òòBoykin€v.€Alabamaóó,Ð V"¦! Ð395€U.S.€238,€243„44€(1969).€€In€òòNorth€Carolina€v.€Alfordóó,€400€U.S.€25€(1970),€the€Supreme€CourtÐ <#Œ" Ðstated,€"The€standard€was€and€remains€whether€the€plea€represents€a€voluntary€and€intelligent€choiceÐ "$r# Ðamong€the€alternative€courses€of€action€open€to€the€defendant."€€òòId.óó€at€31.€€In€òòBoykin€v.€Alabamaóó,Ð %X $ Ð395€U.S.€238€(1969),€the€Supreme€Court€ruled€that€defendants€should€be€advised€of€certainÐ î%>!% Ðconstitutional€rights€before€entering€guilty€pleas,€including€the€privilege€against€self„incrimination,Ð Ô&$"& Ðthe€right€to€confront€witnesses,€and€the€right€to€a€trial€by€jury.€€òòId.óó€at€243.€€If€the€proof€establishesÐ º' #' Ðthat€the€accused€was€aware€of€his€or€her€constitutional€rights,€he€or€she€is€entitled€to€no€relief.€Ð  (ð#( ÐòòJohnson€v.€Stateóó,€834€S.W.2d€922,€926€(Tenn.€1992).€€In€determining€whether€a€plea€of€guilty€wasÐ †)Ö$) Ðvoluntarily,€understandingly,€and€intelligently€entered,€the€court€must€consider€all€of€the€relevantÐ l*¼%* Ðcircumstances€that€existed€at€the€entry€of€the€plea.€€òòState€v.€Turneróó,€919€S.W.2d€346,€353€(Tenn.Ð R+¢&+ ÐCrim.€App.€1995).Ð 8,ˆ', Їà  àAt€the€evidentiary€hearing,€the€Defendant€testified€that€his€counsel€told€him€that€the€State€wasÐ ° Ðoffering€a€plea€bargain€for€twenty„five€years€for€a€plea€to€second€degree€murder,€and€he€would€onlyÐ –æ Ðhave€to€serve€thirty€percent€of€that€sentence€before€being€eligible€for€parole.€€He€admitted€that€theÐ |Ì Ðtrial€judge€told€him€during€the€plea€hearing€that€it€was€twenty„five€years€at€one€hundred€percent,€butÐ b² Ðhe€said€that€he€"thought€[he]€had€a€deal"€for€thirty€percent.€€The€transcript€from€the€hearing€revealsÐ H˜ Ðthat€the€trial€judge€went€into€great€detail€explaining€the€Defendant's€rights€to€him€and€theÐ . ~ Ðconsequences€of€entering€a€guilty€plea.€€The€Defendant€indicated€that€he€understand€all€of€thoseÐ  d Ðrights€and€consequences.€€The€trial€court€explicitly€stated,€"[Y]ou€will€be€required€to€serve€the€25„Ð ú J Ðyear€one€hundred€percent€sentence€upon€your€plea€of€guilty€to€the€Class€A€offense€of€murder€in€theÐ à 0 Ðsecond€degree€and€all€of€the€rest€of€the€time€will€be€included€in€that€particular€sentence.€€Now,€is€thatÐ Æ   Ðyour€understanding,€sir,€of€what€your€plea€arrangement€is€with€the€State?",€to€which€the€DefendantÐ ¬ ü  Ðreplied,€"Yes,€sir."€€After€questioning€the€Defendant€about€his€satisfaction€with€his€attorney'sÐ ’â  Ðrepresentation,€the€trial€judge€again€asked€the€Defendant,€"Now,€you€do€understand€that€as€to€theÐ xÈ  ÐClass€A€felony€of€murder€in€the€second€degree€as€a€violent€offender,€you€will€have€to€serve€oneÐ ^®  Ðhundred€percent€of€your€sentence?€€Do€you€understand€that,€sir?"€€The€Defendant€again€responded,Ð D”  Ð"Yes,€sir."€€At€this€point€Mr.€Hough€indicated€that€he€had€told€the€Defendant€that€he€could€reduceÐ *z  Ðthe€sentence€by€fifteen€percent€for€"good€and€honor€credit,"€which€would€mean€the€Defendant€wouldÐ ` Ðhave€to€serve€at€least€twenty„one€and€a€quarter€years€of€the€sentence,€and€the€Defendant€indicatedÐ öF Ðthat€he€understood€that€as€well.€€Mr.€Hough€testified€at€the€hearing€that€he€did€tell€the€Defendant€atÐ Ü, Ðone€point€that€he€would€be€eligible€for€parole€after€serving€thirty€percent€of€a€twenty„five€yearÐ Â Ðsentence€for€second€degree€murder,€but€he€said€he€later€realized€his€error€and€informed€the€DefendantÐ ¨ø Ðthat€it€would€be€one€hundred€percent€with€possible€reduction€for€good€behavior.€€He€said€that€heÐ ŽÞ Ðthoroughly€went€over€the€plea€agreement€with€the€Defendant€and€that€the€Defendant€knew€what€heÐ tÄ Ðwas€doing.€€He€said€the€Defendant€was€happy€with€the€plea€agreement€because€the€Defendant€wasÐ Zª Ðno€longer€facing€the€death€penalty€or€life€in€prison€and€because€he€was€able€to€serve€his€sentencesÐ @ Ðfor€six€other€crimes€at€the€same€time.Ð &v ÐÌà  àThe€trial€court€found€that€the€Defendant€was€informed€of€and€was€aware€of€his€constitutionalÐ òB Ðrights€and€that€the€guilty€pleas€were€entered€knowingly€and€voluntarily.€€We€agree.€€The€DefendantÐ Ø( Ðnever€gave€any€indication€during€the€plea€hearing€that€he€did€not€understand€his€pleas.€€When€askedÐ ¾ Ðrepeatedly,€he€said€that€he€understood.€€Mr.€Hough€testified€that€he€explained€the€plea€agreement€andÐ ¤ô Ðthat€the€Defendant€knew€what€he€was€doing.€€The€Defendant€admitted€that€the€trial€court€told€himÐ Š Ú Ðhe€would€have€to€serve€one€hundred€percent€of€his€sentence€for€second€degree€murder.€€The€evidenceÐ p!À  Ðsimply€does€not€preponderate€against€the€trial€court's€finding€that€the€pleas€were€knowing€andÐ V"¦! Ðvoluntary.Ð <#Œ" ÐÌà  àThe€judgment€of€the€trial€court€denying€the€Defendant's€petition€for€post„conviction€relief€isÐ %X $ Ðaffirmed.€€€€Ô#†XhLXXXhLf1#ÔÐ î%>!% ÐÌÌÌÌÌÌÐ 8,ˆ', Їà  àà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  àÌÌÌÌà  àà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  à___________________________________€Ð H˜ Ðà  àà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  àDAVID€H.€WELLES,€JUDGE