WPC' A窊fPzfDy)׈^*=&wzK@o72#Y)uw;*_TQկ /x#TrdrR6'7wB|+)2&Ewqj+EwǗerN%6y+PBSTW+@(0e#3d'н>Erf]] offenderconvictedofaClassC,DorEfelonyispresumedto $ beafavorablecandidateforalternativesentencingoptionsin   theabsenceofevidencetothecontrary.   L Q$D T.C.A.4035102.  \   Afterreviewingthestatutessetoutabove,itisclearthattheintentofthe T$ legislatureistoencouragealternativestoincarcerationincaseswheredefendantsare  &  sentencedasstandardormitigatedoffendersconvictedofC,D,orEfelonies.However, '" itisalsoclearthatthereisanintenttoincarceratethosedefendantswhosecriminal )X $ historiesindicateacleardisregardforthelawsandmoralsofsocietyandafailureofpast +$"& effortstorehabilitate.     P-#(   Inthecaseatbar,thedefendantpledguiltytoaClassCfelonyand,as 0', such,sheispresumedtobeafavorablecandidateforalternativesentencing.T.C.A. 2T). 4035102.TheStatecontendsthatthecircumstancesandseriousnessoftheoffense, 4 +0 coupledwiththeneedfordeterrence,renderasentenceoffullprobationerroneous.We L6,2 agreethatthefactsofthiscaseareindeedtragic.However,thelawpresumesthe `  defendanttobeafavorablecandidateforprobationandthisCourtpresumesthetrial ,  courtssentencetobecorrect.SeeT.C.A.4035102,402(d);Ashby,823S.W.2d   at169.Basedontheforegoingpresumptionsandapplicablelawandthefactthatthe d Statehasfailedtocarryitsburdenofovercomingsuchpresumptions,wecannotfindthat 0 thetrialcourtabuseditsdiscretioningrantingthedefendantfullprobation.Assuch,we \  affirmthesentenceasimposed.   (     L      T   ______________________________ `    L      T   JOHNH.PEAY,Judge F CONCUR: > ______________________________ v DAVIDH.WELLES,Judge  \ ______________________________ T$ JOHNEVERETTWILLIAMS,Judge