ÿWPC÷! …U:V % 0C– 0JÙ#n­3 0Üà4¼ Ð w@Ð 0T 0^d 0h 0r* 0|œ 0† 0ž 1u.U,£ 0dÏ B3U,PU*|B)¦DCÏ AM¸_Ç D3ÞØØé 0@Áv~vÓ AOR Æ¡ 0Dg! D/«! BÚ!<þ6X9`("Courier NewTTX(ÿÿ$òòÚ  ÚÚ  Úóó2 ÿÿ0Indent1Ô2ÔÔ3  Ô3|x\«<þ6X9`("Courier NewTTXXxþ6X@ÉDQX@(´È$¡¡ÑÑÑ  ÑÑTR[  AØ'Legal3Ø' AØ'ÿ Legalÿ3Ø'TÑÑ` °ÑÑܰÑÒ4°ÒÒX°ÒÓ  Óà~| HIDJKDLMDNO™PUQÓ€2" ÿÿ0Indent2à0 àÔ2ÔÔ3  Ô2, ÿÿ0Indent3à0 àà0 àÔ2ÔÔ3  Ô26 ÿÿ0Indent4à0 àà0 àà0 àÔ2ÔÔ3  Ô2@ ÿÿ0Indent5à0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àÔ2ÔÔ3  Ô2J ÿÿ0Indent6à0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àÔ2ÔÔ3  Ô2T ÿÿ0Indent7à0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àÔ2ÔÔ3  Ô2^ ÿÿ0Indent8à0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àÔ2ÔÔ3  Ô ÿÿ?AGMSYaioIndent0I.A.1.a.(1)(a)i)a)< Œ 9p`(ModernP ÿÿ8Mac DefaultMac DefaultÓ ` °šXÓ d< Œ 9p`(Monaco< Œ 9p`(Arial% Line 7 d%%%%7Border 1dd€-&Cþÿ << Gÿÿ ®Ý ƒ !ÝÑ  ÑÑ#€d#ÑÔ€ÔÔ€ÔÑ\R AØ'\ÑÑ ` ÑÑ Ü ÑÒ 4 ÒÒ X ÒÝ  ÝÔ€$ÔÔ€$ÔÓ  ÓÔ YYY ÔFILEDÔ€$XÔÌÌò òAprilÏ3,Ï1996ÌÌCecilÏCrowson,ÏJr.ÌÔ€$ôÔAppellateÏCourtÏClerkó ó ½Ý ƒ !ÝÑ#€d#ÑÔ€ÔÔ€ÔÑ\R AØ'\ÑÑ ` ÑÑ Ü ÑÒ 4 ÒÒ X ÒÝ  ÝÓ  ÓÔ€$Ô€€€€€òòÚ  ÚÚ  Úóó€€The€Tennessee€Bureau€of€Investigation€Crime€Lab€later€tested€the€evidenceÏand€determined€that€it€was€"crack"€cocaine€weighing€.5€grams.Ì 'ÿÿdxd ÎÝ ƒ !ÝÑ#€d#ÑÔ€ÔÔ€ÔÑ\R AØ'\ÑÑ ` ÑÑ Ü ÑÒ 4 ÒÒ X ÒÝ  ÝÔ€$ÔÓ  Ó€€€€€òòÚ  ÚÚ  Úóó€€During€the€transaction,€Detective€Matthews€received€a€page€and€had€to€leaveÏthe€scene.€€He€was€replaced€by€Detective€Long,€who€did€not€testify€at€trial.Ì ÎÝ ƒ !ÝÑ#€d#ÑÔ€ÔÔ€ÔÑ\R AØ'\ÑÑ ` ÑÑ Ü ÑÒ 4 ÒÒ X ÒÝ  ÝÔ€$ÔÓ  Ó€€€€€òòÚ  ÚÚ  Úóó€€Without€citing€authority€or€further€arguing€the€point,€the€appellant€also€assertsÏthat€the€removal€of€this€juror€was€improperly€based€on€gender.€€òòSeeóó,€òòe.g.óó,€òòState€v.ÏTurneróó,€879€S.W.2d€819€(Tenn.€1994)(principles€of€òòBatsonóó€apply€to€the€removal€ofÏjurors€based€on€gender).€€As€discussed,€the€condition€of€the€record€prevents€usÏfrom€reviewing€either€the€race€or€gender€based€arguments.Ì("ÿÿ$££Ò  ÒÒ  ÒPtPtHHÚ(ÿáÿâùFG(üHHÚ(d'@Styl{WP}01•ÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃà Ãà Ãà Ãà Ãà ÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÐ ÐÐHHÐÐ  ÐÐ2ÐÐÿÿ¸æ$ÿÐÐHHÐÐÐÐÐÐÐÐ  ÐÐ ÐÐ ÐÑÑÑGenevaÑÑ ÑÑ € ÑÑ<Px–ÈÑÒÒÒ443!#4ÒÒ$ *$ÒÒ$*$ÒÒ ÿKK ÒÒ  Geneva ÒÒ  Geneva ÒÓ.,ÓÓÓÓ6ÓÓ ÓßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßÑMonacoÑÑ ÑÒ  BA:Op Monaco ÒÒ  BA:Op Monaco Ò€-‚ƒCþÿ<< CÿÿƒLevel 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5($$””ò òÚ  Ú1Ú  Úó ó„„'÷ÿ dxdüÿP PdÝ ƒ !ÝÔ . ÔÔ€ÔÓ&€##X„d&ÓÑ#€##Xd#ÑÔ€ÔÑ\R AØ'\ÑÑ ` ÑÑ Ü ÑÒ 4 ÒÒ X ÒÝ  ÝÑ7€ÆÔXXdÖdÈ7ÑÑ  ÑÓ  ÓÓÓÔ€$ÔÙ€€ÙßL€'(&;+'h|` ´- `€€Lßà@ àòòIN€THE€COURT€OFÏCRIMINAL€APPEALS€OF€TENNESSEEÌà@ àAT€KNOXVILLEóóÌà@ àDECEMBER€1995€SESSIONÌÌSTATE€OF€TENNESSEE,à àà à*à àC.C.A.€#03C01„9410„CR„00366Ìà àà àAPPELLEE,à àà à*à àMCMINNÏCOUNTYÌVS.à àà àà àà àà à*à àHon.€Mayo€L.ÏMashburn,€JudgeÌRALPH€AVERY€SMITH,à àà à*à à(Sale€ofÏCocaine)Ìà àà àAPPELLANT.à à*ÌÌÌòòFor€the€Appellant:óóà àà àà àòòà àFor€theÏAppellee:óóÌÓÓEllery€E.€Hill,€Jr.à àà àà àà àCharles€W.ÏBursonÌAttorney€at€Lawà àà àà àà àAttorneyÏGeneral€and€ReporterÌ531€South€Gay€St.€à àà àà àà à450€JamesÍRobertson€ParkwayÌSuite€1515à àà àà àà àà àNashville,€TN€€37243„0493ÌKnoxville,€TN€37902Ì(on€appeal)à àà àà àà àà àChristina€S.€Shevalierà àà àÌà àà àà àà àà àà àAssistant€Attorney€GeneralÌà àà àà àà àà àà à450€James€Robertson€ParkwayÌà àà àà àà àà àà àNashville,€TN€€37243„0493Ìà àÌà àà àà àà àà àà àJerry€N.€EstesÌà àà àà àà àà àà àDistrict€Attorney€GeneralÌÌà àà àà àà àà àà àSandra€Craig€DonaghyÌà àà àà àà àà àà àAsst.€District€Attorney€GeneralÌà àà àà àà àà àà à203€E.€Madison€Ave.Ìà àà àà àà àà àà àP.O.€Box€647Ìà àà àà àà àà àà àAthens,€TN€37371ÌÌÌÌÌÌÌÌOPINION€FILED:òò€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€óóÌÌÌAFFIRMEDÌWilliam€M.€Barker,€JudgeÌÌÒ  ÒÒ „ ÒÓÓà@ àò òOPINIONó óÌò òà àà àó óThe€appellant,€Ralph€Avery€Smith,€was€convicted€of€the€sale€ofÏcocaine,€a€class€B€felony,€and€sentenced€as€a€Range€I€standard€offender€to€eightÏyears€in€the€Department€of€Correction.€€On€appeal,€the€appellant€argues€(a)€that€theÍevidence€was€insufficient€to€support€the€jury's€verdict,€(b)€that€a€prospective€jurorÏwas€improperly€removed€by€the€prosecution€in€violation€of€òòBatson€v.€Kentuckyóó,€476ÏU.S.€79€(1986),€(c)€that€the€trial€court€erred€in€admitting€certain€evidence,€and€(d)Ïthat€he€was€denied€the€effective€assistance€of€counsel€at€trial.ÌÌà àà àWe€conclude€that€there€is€no€reversible€error€in€the€record.€€TheÏjudgment€of€the€trial€court€is,€therefore,€affirmed.ÌÌà àà àOn€August€6,€1993,€Evelyn€Linder€was€working€as€an€informant€for€theÏTenth€Judicial€District€Drug€Task€Force.€€She€met€with€Lt.€Ken€Poteet€and€DetectiveÏBill€Matthews.€€She€was€given€$100€and€told€to€buy€crack€cocaine€from€theÏappellant.€€A€wire€transmitter€was€placed€in€her€car€to€enable€officers€to€monitor€andÏrecord€the€transaction.€€At€1:55€p.m.,€Linder€drove€to€a€certain€location€in€Athens,ÏTennessee,€and€met€with€the€appellant.€€She€gave€him€$100,€and€the€appellant€toldÏher€to€return€to€the€same€location€around€3:00€p.m.€€When€Linder€returned€to€theÏscene,€the€appellant€gave€her€nine€rocks€of€cocaine€base.× ƒ) ××  ×ÌÌà àà àLinder€testified€that€the€appellant€was€a€friend€of€her€son's€and€thatÍshe€had€known€him€nearly€his€entire€life.€€In€July€of€1993,€law€enforcement€officersÏfound€one€of€Linder's€sons€in€possession€of€one€gram€of€cocaine;€thereafter,€LinderÏmet€with€Detective€Bill€Matthews€and€agreed€to€help€officers€arrange€a€purchase€ofÏcocaine€from€the€appellant.€€Linder€conceded€that€her€motive€was€to€help€her€sonÏavoid€a€criminal€prosecution.€€She€also€admitted€that€she€had€worked€as€anÏinformant€for€the€police€in€the€past,€and€that€she€had€been€convicted€of€sellingÏmarijuana€in€1984.ÌÌà àà àDetective€Matthews€testified€that€in€July€of€1993,€a€search€of€Linder'sÏson's€apartment€turned€up€one€gram€of€cocaine.€€Matthews€contacted€Linder,€whoÏwanted€to€help€her€son.€€Matthews€told€her€that€he€was€interested€in€finding€theÏ"main"€supplier€of€crack€cocaine€in€the€area;€Linder€replied€that€she€could€make€aÏpurchase€from€the€appellant.€€Matthews€admitted€that€Linder's€son€was€neverÏarrested€or€charged€with€a€drug€offense€relating€to€the€July€of€1993€incident;€heÏalso€said€that€the€case€was€pending€the€outcome€of€the€appellant's€case.ÌÌà àà àMatthews€and€Poteet€met€with€Linder€before€she€made€the€purchaseÏfrom€the€appellant.€€A€transmitter€was€placed€in€her€car,€and€she€was€given€$100.€ÏThe€officers€monitored€Linder's€meeting€with€the€appellant€by€wire,€but€they€couldÍnot€actually€get€close€enough€to€observe€the€transaction.× ƒ+ ××  ×€€Poteet€conceded€thatÏLinder€was€not€searched€either€before€or€after€she€met€with€the€appellant;€however,Ïafter€Linder€met€with€the€appellant,€she€gave€the€officers€nine€rocks€of€crackÏcocaine.ÌÌà àà àBilly€Simpson,€the€appellant's€father€in€law,€testified€on€behalf€of€theÏappellant.€€Simpson€said€that€on€August€6,€1993,€he€saw€Evelyn€Linder€near€theÏarea€where€the€drug€sale€allegedly€occurred.€€He€was€talking€to€her€when€theÏappellant€approached.€€The€three€talked€for€awhile€but€no€transactions€of€any€kindÏtook€place€between€Linder€and€the€appellant.€€Simpson€did€not€see€Linder€return€toÏthe€scene€again€that€day.€€ÌÌà0 àò òà@ àIÌó óà àà àWhen€a€defendant€challenges€the€sufficiency€of€the€evidence,€theÏstandard€for€review€by€an€appellate€court€is€whether,€after€considering€the€evidenceÏin€a€light€most€favorable€to€the€prosecution,€any€rational€trier€of€fact€could€haveÏfound€the€essential€elements€of€the€crime€beyond€a€reasonable€doubt.€€òòSeeóóÏòòJackson€v.€Virginiaóó,€443€U.S.€307,€318„19€(1979);€òòState€v.€Duncanóó,€698€S.W.2d€63,Í67€(Tenn.€1985);€Tenn.€R.€App.€P.€13(e).€€The€State€is€entitled€to€the€strongestÏlegitimate€view€of€the€evidence€and€to€all€reasonable€and€legitimate€inferences€thatÏmay€be€drawn€therefrom.€€òòState€v.€Cabbageóó,€571€S.W.2d€832,€836€(Tenn.€1978).€€InÏdetermining€the€sufficiency€of€the€evidence,€we€do€not€reweigh€the€evidence,€òòidóó.,Ïnor€do€we€substitute€our€inferences€for€those€drawn€by€the€trier€of€fact€from€theÏevidence.€€òòLiakas€v.€Stateóó,€199€Tenn.€298,€305,€286€S.W.2d€856,€859€(1956).ÌÌà àà àThe€appellant€argues€that€the€evidence€did€not€support€the€jury'sÏverdict€of€guilty€as€to€the€sale€of€cocaine;€instead,€he€claims€that€the€evidenceÏsupported€only€a€conviction€for€the€casual€exchange€of€a€controlled€substance.€ÏòòSeeóó€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð39„17„418.€€We€disagree.€€The€testimony€of€the€State'sÏwitnesses€clearly€revealed€that€the€appellant€sold€.5€grams€of€crack€cocaine€toÏEvelyn€Linder€for€$100.€€Moreover,€the€transcript€indicates€that€the€trial€judgeÏinstructed€the€jury€on€the€lesser€included€offense€of€casual€exchange,€and€that€itÏwas€rejected€by€the€jury€in€favor€of€the€greater€offense.€€The€appellant€essentiallyÏasks€us€to€reconsider€the€evidence€and€substitute€a€verdict€of€casual€exchange€forÏthe€verdict€found€by€the€jury.€€That€is€not€our€function.€€Instead,€we€conclude€that€aÏrational€trier€of€fact€could€have€found€the€essential€elements€of€the€offense€beyondÏa€reasonable€doubt.€€Tenn.€R.€App.€P.€13(e).ÌÌÌà@ àò òIIó óÌà àà àThe€appellant€argues€that€a€prospective€juror€was€removed€by€theÏState€on€the€basis€of€her€race€in€violation€of€òòBatson€v.€Kentuckyóó,€476€U.S.€79Ï(1986).× ƒ, ××  ×€€In€òòBatsonóó,€òòsupraóó,€the€Supreme€Court€held€that€equal€protection€prohibitsÏthe€State€from€challenging€jurors€solely€on€the€basis€of€race.€€If€a€òòprimaóó€òòfacieóó€caseÏof€exclusion€is€made€by€a€defendant,€the€burden€is€on€the€prosecution€to€offer€aÏrace€neutral€explanation€for€its€action€on€the€record.€€òòIdóó.€at€96„97;€òòseeóó€òòalsoóó€òòGeorgiaÏv.€McCollumóó,€112€S.Ct.€2348,€120€L.Ed.2d€33€(1993)€(applying€òòBatsonóó€principles€toÏexclusion€of€jurors€by€a€defendant).ÌÌà àà àWe€are€unable€to€review€this€issue€in€this€case.€€First,€the€issue€wasÏwaived€because€it€was€not€raised€in€the€appellant's€motion€for€a€new€trial.€€òòSeeóóÏTenn.€R.€App.€P.€3(e);€òòState€v.€Keelóó,€882€S.W.2d€410€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.€1994).€ÏSecond,€there€is€no€transcript€of€the€voir€dire€included€with€the€record€on€appeal.€€ItÏis€the€appellant's€obligation€to€prepare€a€fair,€accurate,€and€complete€record€ofÍwhat€transpired€in€the€trial€court€with€respect€to€an€issue€raised€on€appeal.€€òòState€v.ÏBolingóó,€840€S.W.2d€944€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.€1992);€òòState€v.€Bennettóó,€798€S.W.2d€783Ï(1990).€€Absent€an€adequate€record,€we€must€presume€the€rulings€of€the€trial€judgeÏwere€correct.€€òòState€v.€Oodyóó,€823€S.W.2d€554€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.€1991).€ÏAccordingly,€the€appellant€is€not€entitled€to€relief€on€this€ground.ÌÌà@ àò òIIIó óÌà àà àThe€appellant€argues€that€the€trial€court€committed€reversible€error€byÏallowing€Lt.€Poteet€to€testify€as€to€what€he€heard€Evelyn€Linder€say€when€he€wasÏmonitoring€her€conversation€with€the€appellant.€€He€claims€that€there€was€noÏfoundation€for€such€testimony€because€Poteet€did€not€testify€that€he€was€able€toÏrecognize€Linder's€voice€on€the€surveillance€monitor.ÌÌà àà àAgain,€the€appellant€has€waived€appellate€review€of€this€issue€byÏfailing€to€include€it€in€his€motion€for€a€new€trial.€€Tenn.€R.€App.€P.€3(e).€€In€any€event,Ïit€is€clear€that€reversible€error€was€not€committed.€€First,€although€Poteet€was€notÏspecifically€asked€whether€he€recognized€Linder's€voice,€his€testimony€that€he€metÏwith€Linder€and€then€monitored€the€transaction€immediately€thereafter€implicitlyÏrevealed€that€he€recognized€her€voice.€€Moreover,€Linder€testified€immediately€afterÏLt.€Poteet,€and€she€reiterated€nearly€the€same€events€and€statements€described€byÍPoteet.€€Thus,€the€appellant€is€not€entitled€to€relief€on€this€issue.ÌÌà@ àò òIVó óÌà àà àFinally,€the€appellant€maintains€that€he€was€denied€the€effectiveÏassistance€of€counsel€at€trial.€€He€argues€that€trial€counsel€failed€to:€(a)€preserve€theÏòòBatsonóó€issue€during€jury€selection;€(b)€properly€object€to€Poteet's€testimony€aboutÏwhat€he€heard€via€the€surveillance€monitor;€(c)€properly€use€the€tape€recording€ofÏthe€transaction€to€highlight€inconsistencies€in€the€State's€evidence;€and€(d)€argueÏthe€defense€of€casual€exchange.€€This€issue€was€not€preserved€in€the€motion€for€aÏnew€trial€and€is€therefore€waived.€Tenn.€R.€App.€P.€3(e);€òòState€v.€Clarkóó,€Shelby€Crim.ÏApp.€No.€9,€1986€WL€5314€(Tenn.€Cr.€App.€May€7,€1986).€€(When€raised€on€directÏappeal€claims€of€ineffective€assistance€of€counsel€must€be€raised€in€motion€for€newÏtrial€or€be€treated€as€waived.)Ìà àAccordingly,€the€judgment€of€the€trial€court€is€affirmed.Ì€ÌÓÓ€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€___________________________Ì€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€William€M.€Barker,€JudgeÌÌÌÌ________________________________ÌDavid€G.€Hayes,€JudgeÌÌÌÌ________________________________ÌJerry€L.€Smith,€Judge€€€