ÿWPCÃ9 …U:V % 0Ü–w@r 4² Æ FÕ 0  0D; 0J 0TÉ 0^ 0h{ 0rã 0|U 0†Ñ 0W 1uçU ,\ Bˆ 0d¥U, U*5B)_ D3ˆDC» AMþ 0@K¾‹=I‚†késå\#¯A%ð&*;',kb.v~Í0vÓK2 AO8Æm8 0D39 D/w9 B¦9, øð AZ‹"Arial RegularX(´`$¡¡Ñ°ÑÒ°ÒÑTR[  AØ'ÿ Legal3Ø' AØ'ÿ Legalÿ3Ø'TÑÑ7€‰GXXdðXXdð7ÑÑ  Ñ üDýUþUÿUEEÓ€Ô¡¨ èô3|xBurkhartTurneydilauoid(Ð(3™$¤¤Ý ƒ`!ÝѰÑÒ°ÒÑTR[  AØ'ÿ Legal3Ø' AØ'ÿ Legalÿ3Ø'TÑÑ7€œÁXXdædæ7ÑÑ  ÑÝ  Ýà ` àòòÚ  Ú0Ú  Úóó(#Ã$òòÚ  Ú0Ú  Úóó2 ÿÿ0Indent1Ô2ÔÔ3  Ô2" ÿÿ0Indent2à0 àÔ2ÔÔ3  Ô2, ÿÿ0Indent3à0 àà0 àÔ2ÔÔ3  Ô26 ÿÿ0Indent4à0 àà0 àà0 àÔ2ÔÔ3  Ô2@ ÿÿ0Indent5à0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àÔ2ÔÔ3  Ô2J ÿÿ0Indent6à0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àÔ2ÔÔ3  Ô2T ÿÿ0Indent7à0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àÔ2ÔÔ3  Ô2^ ÿÿ0Indent8à0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àÔ2ÔÔ3  Ô ÿÿ?AGMSYaioIndent0I.A.1.a.(1)(a)i)a)< Œ 9p`(Modern dP ÿÿ8Mac DefaultMac DefaultÓ ` °šXÓ< Œ 9p`(Monaco< Œ 9p`(Arial% Line 7 d'ÿÿdxd))))7Border 1dd€-+Cþÿ << Gÿÿ("ÿÿ$££Ò  ÒÒ  Ò ´Ý ƒ!ÝÑ  ÑÑ#€d#ÑÔ€ÔÔ€(ÔÑ  ÑÒ  ÒÒ ! ÒÑ\R AØ'\ÑÑ#€d#ÑÑ  ÑÝ  ÝÔ€(ÔÓ  Óò òÔ YYY ÔFILEDÔ€(XÔÌÌAu…gustÏ1,Ï1996ÌÌCecilÏW.ÏCrowsonÌAp…pellateÏCourtÏClerkÔ  Ôó ó 3Ý ƒ!ÝÑ#€d#ÑÔ€ÔÔ€(ÔÑ  ÑÒ  ÒÒ ° ÒÑ\R AØ'\ÑÑ#€d#ÑÑ  ÑÝ  ÝÝ ƒ $Ýà àòòÚ  ÚÚ  ÚóóÝ  ÝThese€convictions€resulted€from€the€following€charges:Ìà àà8 à(1)€€Presentment€#€II„794„185,€returned€July€11,Ï1994,€charging€the€appellant,€in€count€three,€withÏtheft€over€$500€by€exercising€control.ÌÌà àà8 à(2)€€Presentment€#€II„1294„356,€returned€DecemberÏ12,€1994,€charging€the€appellant,€in€count€two,€withÏtheft€over€$1000€by€exercising€control.ÌÌà àà8 à(3)€€Presentment€#€II„1294„357,€returned€DecemberÏ12,€1994,€charging€the€appellant,€in€count€one,€withÏfailure€to€appear€in€case€II„694„158€(òòseeóó€òòinfraóó€note€2)Ïand,€in€count€two,€with€failure€to€appear€in€case€II„794„185.ÌÌà àThe€convictions€were€consolidated€for€sentencing€purposes€and€are€theÏfocus€of€this€appeal.Ì xÝ ƒ!ÝÑ#€d#ÑÔ€ÔÔ€(ÔÑ  ÑÒ  ÒÒ ° ÒÑ\R AØ'\ÑÑ#€d#ÑÑ  ÑÝ  ÝÝ ƒ $Ýà àòòÚ  ÚÚ  ÚóóÝ  ÝIndictment€#€II„694„158,€returned€on€June€13,€1994,€charged€theÏappellant€with€four€offenses,€but€resulted€in€two€misdemeanor€convictionsÏ(driving€on€a€revoked€license€and€simple€possession€of€marijuana),€following€aÏbench€trial.€€The€trial€court€acquitted€the€appellant€of€the€charges€of€possessionÏof€a€controlled€substance€in€a€county€jail€and€introduction€of€a€controlledÏsubstance€into€a€county€jail.€€At€the€sentencing€hearing,€the€trial€court€imposed€aÏsix€month€sentence€for€each€conviction.€€The€appellant€does€not€appeal€thoseÏsentences.Ì aÝ ƒ!ÝÑ#€d#ÑÔ€ÔÔ€(ÔÑ  ÑÒ  ÒÒ ° ÒÑ\R AØ'\ÑÑ#€d#ÑÑ  ÑÝ  ÝÝ ƒ $Ýà àòòÚ  ÚÚ  ÚóóÝ  ÝIn€addition€to€a€prior€criminal€history,€the€record€indicates€that,€at€the€timeÏof€the€sentencing€hearing,€the€appellant€had€a€pending€burglary€charge€inÏWilliamson€County,€a€pending€shoplifting€charge€in€Davidson€County,€and€aÏpending€theft€charge€in€Hamilton€County.Ì ßÝ ƒ!ÝÑ#€d#ÑÔ€ÔÔ€(ÔÑ  ÑÒ  ÒÒ ° ÒÑ\R AØ'\ÑÑ#€d#ÑÑ  ÑÝ  ÝÝ ƒ $Ýà àòòÚ  ÚÚ  ÚóóÝ  ÝOn€March€1,€1993,€in€case€#€1292„342„A,€the€appellant€received€fourÏconcurrent€sentences€for€felony€drug€convictions€resulting€in€a€jail€term€followedÏby€a€two€year€period€of€supervised€probation.€€The€record€reflects€that€theÏdriving€on€a€revoked€license€and€simple€possession€offenses€occurred€onÏ"November€1,€1993;"€the€theft€over€$500€offense€occurred€in€"January„February„March€1994;"€€the€theft€over€$1000€offense€occurred€in€"October„NovemberÏ1994;"€and€the€two€failure€to€appear€offenses€occurred€on€"November€9,€1994."€ÏThe€record€is€not€dispositive€as€to€whether€the€appellant€remained€onÏsupervised€probation€during€the€period€November€1993€through€NovemberÏ1994.€€The€pre„sentence€report€indicates€that€probation€was€revoked€onÏSeptember€14,€1994;€the€autolog€(videotape€log)€indicates€that€probation€wasÏrevoked€on€February€27,€1995.€€Neither€of€these€proceedings€were€included€inÏthe€record.€Ì ÛÝ ƒ!ÝÑ#€d#ÑÔ€ÔÔ€(ÔÑ  ÑÒ  ÒÒ ° ÒÑ\R AØ'\ÑÑ#€d#ÑÑ  ÑÝ  ÝÝ ƒ $Ýà àòòÚ  ÚÚ  ÚóóÝ  ÝThe€record€indicates€that€the€appellant€was€released€on€bail€on€July€5,Ï1994,€following€his€indictment€for€this€offense€in€June,€1994.Ì ¥Ý ƒ!ÝÑ#€d#ÑÔ€ÔÔ€(ÔÑ  ÑÒ  ÒÒ ° ÒÑ\R AØ'\ÑÑ#€d#ÑÑ  ÑÝ  ÝÝ ƒ $Ýà àòòÚ  ÚÚ  ÚóóÝ  ÝThe€State€concedes€that€the€trial€court€erred€in€applying€this€enhancingÏfactor.Ì Ý ƒ!ÝÑ#€d#ÑÔ€ÔÔ€(ÔÑ  ÑÒ  ÒÒ ° ÒÑ\R AØ'\ÑÑ#€d#ÑÑ  ÑÝ  ÝÝ ƒ $Ýà àòòÚ  ÚÚ  ÚóóÝ  ÝWe€note€that€the€judgments€of€conviction€are€inconsistent€with€anÏeffective€twelve€year€sentence.€€The€judgment€in€case€#€11„1294„356€directsÏthat€the€six€year€sentence€imposed€in€that€case€run€consecutively€to€"all€otherÏcases."€€This€results€in€an€effective€sentence€of€sixteen€years.€€Thus,€thisÏsentence€does€not€correspond€to€the€twelve€year€sentence€presented€in€theÏrecord.€€Upon€remand,€the€judgment€òòmustóó€reflect€the€correct€sentence.Ì Ý ƒ!ÝÑ#€d#ÑÔ€ÔÔ€(ÔÑ  ÑÒ  ÒÒ ° ÒÑ\R AØ'\ÑÑ#€d#ÑÑ  ÑÝ  ÝÝ ƒ $Ýà àòòÚ  ÚÚ  ÚóóÝ  ÝThe€1995€Tenn.€Pub.€Acts€ch.€493€has€amended€the€statute€for€offensesÏoccurring€on€or€after€July€1,€1995,€to€make€the€presumptive€sentence€in€a€classÏA€felony€the€midpoint€in€the€range.Ì 1Ý ƒ!ÝÑ#€d#ÑÔ€ÔÔ€(ÔÑ  ÑÒ  ÒÒ ° ÒÑ\R AØ'\ÑÑ#€d#ÑÑ  ÑÝ  ÝÝ ƒ $Ýà àòòÚ  ÚÚ  ÚóóÝ  Ý"If€the€court€orders€that€the€sentences€be€served€consecutively€orÏconcurrently,€the€order€shall€specifically€recite€the€reasons€for€such€ruling€andÏsuch€judgment€is€reviewable€on€appeal.ðð€€Tenn.€R.€Crim.€P.€32(c)(1).Ì aÝ ƒ!ÝÑ#€d#ÑÔ€ÔÔ€(ÔÑ  ÑÒ  ÒÒ ° ÒÑ\R AØ'\ÑÑ#€d#ÑÑ  ÑÝ  ÝÝ ƒ $Ýà àòòÚ  ÚÚ  ÚóóÝ  ÝUnder€similar€factual€circumstances,€our€supreme€court€held:€€ð ðAs€aÏgeneral€rule,€a€trial€judge€may€correct€an€illegal,€as€opposed€to€a€merelyÏerroneous,€sentence€at€any€time,€even€if€it€has€become€final."€€òòState€v.€Burkhartóó,Ï566€S.W.2d€871,€873€(Tenn.€1978).ÌPtPtHHÚ(ÿáÿâùFG(üHHØ(d'`Styl{WP}01•ÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃà Ãà Ãà Ãà Ãà ÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÐ ÐÐHHÐÐ  ÐÐ2ÐÐÿÿ¸æ$ÿÐÐHHÐÐÐÐÐÐÐÐ  ÐÐ ÐÐ ÐÑÑÑGenevaÑÑ ÑÑ € ÑÑ<Px–ÈÑÒÒÒ443!#4ÒÒ$ *$ÒÒ$*$ÒÒ ÿKK ÒÒ  Geneva ÒÒ  Geneva ÒÓ.,ÓÓÓÓ6ÓÓ ÓßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßÑMonacoÑÑ ÑÒ  BA Op Monaco ÒÒ  BA Op Monaco Ò€-‚ƒCþÿ<< CÿÿƒLevel 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5($$””ò òÚ  Ú1Ú  Úó ó„„'÷ÿ dxdüÿP PdÝ ƒ!ÝÔ . ÔÔ€ÔÓ&€''X„d&ÓÑ#€''Xd#ÑÔ€(ÔÑ  ÑÒ  ÒÒ ° ÒÑ\R AØ'\ÑÑ#€Xd#ÑÑ#€Xd#ÑÑ  ÑÝ  ÝÙ€€Ùò òßL€,.+;+'h|` õ `€€Lß›à@ àIN€THE€COURT€OFÏCRIMINAL€APPEALS€OF€TENNESSEEÌà@ àAT€NASHVILLEÌà@ àAPRIL€SESSION,Ï1996Ìó óÌÌÌÌò òSTATE€OF€TENNESSEEó ó,à àà à)Ìà àà àà àà àà à)à àNo.€01C01„9507„CC„00229Ìà àAppelleeà àà àà à)Ìà àà àà àà àà à)à àWILLIAMSON€COUNTYÌvs.à àà àà àà àà à)Ìà àà àà àà àà à)à àHon.€HenryÏDenmark€Bell,€JudgeÌò òBILLY€RAY€SMITHSONó ó,à àà à)Ìà àà àà àà àà à)à à(Theft€ofÏProperty€Over€$500;Ìà àAppellantà àà àà à)à àTheft€ofÏProperty€Over€$1000;Ìà àà àà àà àà àà à2€CountsÏFailure€to€Appear,€Class€EÌà àà àà àà àà àà àfelonies)ÌÌÌòòFor€the€Appellantóó:à àà àà àà àòòFor€the€Appelleeóó:ÌÌJohn€H.€Hendersonà àà àà àà àCharles€W.€BursonÌDistrict€Public€Defenderà àà àà àAttorney€General€and€ReporterÌ407€C.€Main€Streetà àÌFranklin,€TN€€37065„0068à àà àà àWilliam€David€BridgersÌà àà àà àà àà àà àAssistant€AttorneyÏGeneralà àà àà àà àà àà àà àCriminal€Justice€DivisionÌà àà àà àà àà àà à450€James€Robertson€ParkwayÌà àà àà àà àà àà àNashville,€TN€37243„0493à àà àà àà àÌà àà àà àà àà àà àÌà àà àà àà àà àà àJoseph€D.€Baugh,€Jr.Ìà àà àà àà àà àà àDistrict€Attorney€GeneralÌÌà àà àà àà àà àà àJeff€BurksÌà àà àà àà àà àà àAsst.€District€Attorney€GeneralÌà àà àà àà àà àà àP.€O.€Box€937Ìà àà àà àà àà àà àFranklin,€TN€€37065„0937ÌÌÌÌÌOPINION€FILED:€€òò€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€óóÌÌò òREVERSED€AND€œREMANDED€FOR€RESENTENCINGó ó›ÌÌÌÌò òDavid€G.€Hayesó óÌJudgeÇÓÓà@ àò òOPINIONó óÌÌà àThe€appellant,€Billy€Ray€Smithson,€appeals€as€of€right€from€sentencesÏimposed€by€the€Criminal€Court€of€Williamson€County.€€Pursuant€to€a€pleaÏagreement,€the€appellant€pled€guilty€to€one€count€of€theft€of€property€over€$500,Ïa€class€E€felony;€one€count€of€theft€of€property€over€$1000,€a€class€D€felony;€andÏtwo€counts€of€failure€to€appear,€class€E€felonies.× ƒ/ ××  ×€€The€trial€court€effectivelyÏsentenced€the€appellant,€as€a€range€II€multiple€offender,€to€twelve€yearsÏincarceration€in€the€Department€of€Correction.€€The€appellant€now€appeals€theÏtrial€court's€sentencing€decisions,€contending€that€the€court's€sentence€for€eachÏoffense€was€excessive€and€that€the€court€erred€in€imposing€consecutiveÏsentences.€€For€the€reasons€cited€herein,€we€remand€this€case€for€resentencing.ÌÌà@ àò òBACKGROUNDó óÌÌà àThe€appellant's€convictions€arose€from€multi„count€indictments€andÏpresentments€which€were€returned€during€three€separate€terms€of€theÏWilliamson€County€Grand€Jury.€€ÌÌà àOn€March€27,€1995,€a€consolidated€sentencing€hearing€was€held€on€theÏfour€cases€(#II„794„185,€II„1294„356,€II„1294„357,€II„694„158).× ƒ0 ××  ×€€The€proof€at€theÏsentencing€hearing€consisted€of€the€testimony€of€the€appellant€and€the€pre„sentence€report.€€The€appellant€œis›€thirty„six€years€old€œand›€obtained€his€GEDÏwhile€previously€incarcerated€in€the€Department€of€Correction,€Turney€Center.€ÏHe€œadmits›€to€an€extensive€history€of€drug€abuse,€including€the€illegal€use€ofÏœDilaudid›€and€marijuana.€€Prior€to€his€arrest,€he€was€employed€by€his€brother€asÏa€brick€mason.€€The€appellant€has€a€lengthy€criminal€history€dating€back€toÍ1977.× ƒ1 ××  ×€€This€history€includes€five€prior€felony€convictions€and€seven€priorÏmisdemeanor€convictions.€€The€appellant's€felony€convictions€involve€the€saleÏof€marijuana€and€conspiracy€to€sell€marijuana.€€His€misdemeanor€convictionsÏare€primarily€alcohol€related.€€The€appellant€admits€that€he€was€on€probationÏresulting€from€felony€drug€convictions€when€he€was€arrested€on€the€charge€ofÏtheft€of€property€over€$500.œ× ƒ2 ××  ×›€€The€appellant€also€admits€and€the€record€reflectsÏthat€he€was€on€bail€for€the€theft€of€property€offense€over€$500€when€heÏcommitted€the€offense€of€theft€of€property€over€$1000€and€the€two€offenses€ofÏfailure€to€appear.× ƒ3 ××  ×€ÌÌà àAt€the€consolidated€sentencing€hearing,€the€trial€court€relied€upon€threeÏenhancement€factors€in€determining€the€length€of€the€sentence€for€each€of€theÏappellantððs€four€convictions:ÌÓÓÌà8 à(1)€The€defendant€had€a€previous€history€of€criminal€convictions€orÏcriminal€behavior€in€addition€to€those€necessary€to€establish€theÏappropriate€range.€€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€40„35„114(1);ÌÌà8 à(2)€The€felonies€were€committed€while€on€any€of€the€followingÏforms€of€release€status€if€such€release€is€from€a€prior€felonyÏconviction:ÌÌà àà à(A)€Bail,€if€the€defendant€is€ultimately€convicted€of€suchÌà àà àprior€felony.€€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€40„35„114(13)(A);€orÌÌà àà à(C)€Probation.€€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€40„35„114(13)(C);€andÌÌÌà8 à(3)€The€offense€involved€more€than€one€(1)€victim.€€(Tenn.€CodeÏAnn.€ðð€40„35„114(3).× ƒ4 ××  ×€€ÌÌÌÌÓÓà àAt€the€conclusion€of€the€sentencing€hearing,€the€trial€court€imposed€theÏfollowing€sentences:ÌÓÓà à(1)à8 àPresentment€No.€II€„794„185,€count€3,€theft€ofÏproperty€over€$500€„€sentence:€4€years,€range€II.ÌÌà à(2)à8 àPresentment€No.€II€„1294„356,€count€2,€theft€ofÏproperty€over€$1000€„€sentence:€6€years,€range€II.ÌÌà à(3)à8 àPresentment€No.€II€„1294„357,€count€1,€failure€toÏappear,€class€E€felony€„€sentence€3€years,€range€II;€Ïcount€2,€failure€to€appear,€class€E€felony€„€sentence:Ï3€years,€range€II.ÌÌÌÓÓFollowing€a€determination€of€the€length€and€range€of€the€sentences,€the€trialÏcourt€ordered€that€the€sentences€imposed€under€counts€one€and€two€in€caseÏNo.€II„1294„357€run€consecutively€and€that€these€sentences€be€servedÏconsecutively€to€the€six€year€sentence€imposed€in€No.€II„1294„356,€resulting€inÏan€effective€twelve€year€sentence.œ× ƒ5 ××  ×›€€The€trial€court€also€ordered€that€the€fourÏyear€sentence€imposed€in€case€No.€II„794„185€be€served€concurrently€with€theÏeffective€twelve€year€sentence.€€No€explanation€was€offered€by€the€trial€court€inÏimposing€consecutive€sentences.€ÌÌÌà@ àò òANALYSISó óÌÌà àThe€appellant€argues€that€his€sentences€are€excessive€and€that€the€trialÏcourt€erroneously€imposed€consecutive€sentences.€ÌÌà àWhen€there€is€a€challenge€to€the€length,€range€or€manner€of€service€of€aÏsentence,€it€is€the€duty€of€this€court€to€conduct€a€òòde€novoóó€review€with€aÏpresumption€that€the€determinations€made€by€the€trial€court€are€correct.€€Tenn.ÏCode€Ann.€ðð€40„35„401(d)(1990).€€This€presumption€is€"conditioned€upon€theÏaffirmative€showing€in€the€record€that€the€trial€court€considered€the€sentencingÏprinciples€and€all€relevant€facts€and€circumstances."€€òòState€v.€Ashbyóó,€823ÏS.W.2d€166,€169€(Tenn.€1991).€€The€Sentencing€Commission€CommentsÏprovide€that€the€burden€is€on€the€appellant€to€show€the€impropriety€of€theÏsentence.ÌÌà àOur€review€requires€an€analysis€of€(1)€the€evidence,€if€any,€received€atÏthe€trial€and€sentencing€hearing;€(2)€the€presentence€report;€(3)€the€principles€ofÏsentencing€and€the€arguments€of€counsel€relative€to€sentencing€alternatives;€(4)Ïthe€nature€and€characteristics€of€the€offense;€(5)€any€mitigating€or€enhancementÏfactors;€(6)€any€statements€made€by€the€defendant€on€his€own€behalf;€and€(7)Ïthe€defendant's€potential€for€rehabilitation€or€treatment.€€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðððð€40„35„102,€„103(5),€and€„210(b)€(1990);€€òòState€v.€Byrdóó,€861€S.W.2d€377,€379€(Tenn.ÏCrim.€App.€1993)€(citing€òòAshbyóó,€923€S.W.2d€at€168).ÌÌà@ àò òA.€€Length€of€Sentencesó óÌÌà àIn€calculating€the€sentence€for€a€felony€conviction,€the€presumptiveÏsentence€is€the€minimum€within€the€range,€if€there€are€no€enhancement€orÏmitigating€factors.€€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€40„35„210(c).× ƒ6 ××  ×€€If€there€are€enhancementÏfactors€but€no€mitigating€factors,€the€trial€court€may€set€the€sentence€above€theÏminimum.€€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€40„35„210(d).€€A€sentence€involving€bothÏenhancement€and€mitigating€factors€requires€an€assignment€of€relative€weightÏfor€the€enhancement€factors€as€a€means€of€increasing€the€sentence.€€Tenn.ÏCode€Ann.€ðð€40„35„210(e).€€The€sentence€may€then€be€reduced€within€theÏrange€by€any€weight€assigned€to€the€mitigating€factors€present.€€òòIdóó.ÌÌà àThe€record€supports€the€trial€court's€application€of€enhancement€factorÏ(1),€previous€criminal€convictions€beyond€those€necessary€to€establish€theÏrange,€to€all€four€sentences.€€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€40„35„114(1)(1994€Supp.).€ÏHowever,€the€record€only€supports€application€of€enhancement€factor€13(C),Ïconcerning€his€probationary€status,€to€the€appellantððs€sentence€for€theft€ofÏproperty€over€$500€in€case€No.€II„794„185.€€òòBut€seeóóòò€supraóó€note€4.€€Upon€òòdeÏnovoóó€review,€we€find€that€the€record€does€support€application€of€enhancementÏfactor€13(A)€to€the€remaining€three€convictions,€because€these€felonies€wereÏcommitted€while€the€appellant€was€on€bail€for€a€felony€offense,€#€II„794„185:Ítheft€over€$500,€€of€which€he€was€convicted.€€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€œ40„35„114(13)(A).The›€trial€court€imposed€mid„range€sentences€for€the€appellantððsÏconviction€for€theft€of€property€over€$1000€and€the€two€convictions€for€failure€toÏappear.€€The€court€imposed€the€maximum€sentence€within€the€range€for€theÏoffense€of€theft€of€property€over€$500.€€The€court€properly€relied€uponÏenhancement€factors€(1),€13(A),€and€13(C),€finding€that€the€appellant€has€aÏprevious€history€of€criminal€convictions€and€that€the€resulting€convictionsÏoccurred€while€the€appellant€was€on€bail€or€probation.ÌÌà àClearly,€the€appellantððs€criminal€history€is€long„standing€and€extensive,Ïand,€in€our€opinion,€is€entitled€to€substantial€weight.€€The€weight€to€be€attributedÏto€each€factor€is€determined€based€on€the€relevant€facts€and€circumstances€ofÏeach€case.€€òòState€v.€Mossóó,€727€S.W.2d€229,€238€(Tenn.€œ1986).€€Accordingly,›€weÏconclude€that€the€sentences€imposed€by€the€trial€court€were€appropriate.€€ThisÏissue€is€without€merit.ÌÌà@ àò òB.€€Consecutive€Sentencingó óÌœ›œÌ›à àThe€appellant€next€contends€that€the€imposition€of€consecutive€sentencesÏwas€improper.€€Specifically,€the€appellant€contends€that€ð ðhis€effective€sentenceÏof€twelve€years€in€these€four€consolidated€cases€is€too€severe€and€should€beÏmodified€downward.ðð€€The€State,€on€the€other€hand,€contends€that€the€issue€ofÍconsecutive€sentences€in€the€cases€before€us€is€controlled€by€the€mandatoryÏconsecutive€sentencing€provisions€of€Rule€32(c)(3),€Tenn.€R.€Crim.€P.,€Tenn.ÏCode€Ann.€ðð€40„20„111(b)(1990),€and€this€courtððs€ruling€in€òòState€v.€Foxóó,€No.Ï01C01„9402„CC„00050€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.€at€Nashville,€May€18,€1995).€€WeÏagree.€€Rule€32(c)(3)€of€the€Tennessee€Rules€of€Criminal€Procedure€provides€inÏrelevant€part€as€follows:ÌÓÓà8 àWhere€a€defendant€is€convicted€of€multiple€offenses€from€one€trialÏor€where€the€defendant€has€additional€sentences€not€yet€fullyÏserved€as€the€result€of€the€convictions€in€the€same€or€other€courtÏand€the€law€requires€consecutive€sentences,€the€sentence€shall€beÏconsecutive€whether€the€judgment€explicitly€so€orders€or€not.€€ThisÏrule€shall€apply:€(c)€To€a€sentence€for€a€felony€where€theÏdefendant€was€released€on€bail€and€the€defendant€is€convicted€ofÏboth€offenses.ÌÌÓÓIn€òòState€v.€Foxóó,€No.€01C01„9402„CC„0005,€this€court€held:€ð ðWhen€an€accusedÏhas€been€released€on€bail€after€being€charged€with€the€commission€of€aÏcriminal€offense,€the€trial€court€is€required€to€order€consecutive€sentencing€forÏthat€offense€and€all€felony€offenses€that€were€committed€following€his€release,€ifÏthe€accused€was€subsequently€convicted€of€the€offenses.ðð€€òòSee€alsoóó€Tenn.ÏCode€Ann.€ðð€40„20„111(b).ÌÌà àIn€this€case,€the€appellant€was€on€bail€for€the€offense€of€theft€of€propertyÏover€$500€(No.€II„794„185)€when€he€committed€the€offense€of€theft€over€$1000Ï(No.€II„1294„356)€and€the€two€offenses€of€failure€to€appear€(No.€II„1294„357).€€AllÏfour€charges€resulted€in€felony€convictions.€€Therefore,€the€four€year€sentenceÍfor€theft€over€$500€must€be€served€consecutively€to€the€appellant's€sentence€forÏtheft€over€$1000,€for€an€aggregate€sentence€of€ten€years€and€consecutively€toÏeach€of€the€three€year€sentences€imposed€for€failure€to€appear,€for€aggregateÏsentences€of€six€years.€€The€State€contends,€however,€that€Rule€32(c)(3),€Tenn.ÏR.€Crim.€P.,€requires€that€all€four€sentences€in€this€case€be€served€consecutivelyÏfor€an€effective€sentence€of€sixteen€years.€€Our€interpretation€of€the€statute€or€theÏrules€does€not€lead€us€to€this€result.€€€In€a€similar€factual€scenario€a€panel€of€thisÏcourt€recently€held:€ÌÓÓà8 àWe€agree€that€the€sentences€in€the€post„bail€cases€must€be€runÏconsecutively€with€the€sentences€in€the€pre„bail€cases.€€However,Ïwe€find€no€defining€requirement€that€all€of€the€post„bail€feloniesÏmust€be€served€consecutively€to€each€other.€€We€conclude€theÏjudge€may,€with€appropriate€reason,€run€all€of€the€pre„bail€andÏpost„bail€sentences€consecutively.€.€.€.€€Neither€do€we€find€the€trialÏcourt€must€run€all€of€the€sentences€for€the€post„bail€offensesÏconsecutively€to€each€other.€€The€trial€judge€may€run€each€of€theseÏsentences€concurrently.€€The€trial€judge€must,€however,€inÏaccordance€with€the€cited€statute,€rule,€and€case€run€the€sentencesÏimposed€in€post„bail€cases€„„€be€they€fixed€to€be€servedÏconcurrently€or€consecutively€to€each€other€„„€consecutively€to€theÏsentences€imposed€in€pre„bail€cases.ÌÌòòState€v.€Fosteróó,€No.€03C01„9510„CC„00337€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.€at€Knoxville,ÏJune€27,€1996).ÌÌÌÓÓà àIn€the€consolidated€cases€before€us,€the€trial€court€failed€to€recite€anyÏreason€for€its€imposition€of€consecutive€sentences.× ƒ7 ××  ×€€€Because€the€sentences€inÍthe€post„bail€cases€do€not€mandate€imposition€of€consecutive€sentences€and€inÏview€of€the€trial€courtððs€failure€to€run€the€post„bail€sentences€consecutive€to€theÏpre„bail€sentence,€we€must€remand€this€case€for€resentencing.× ƒ8 ××  ×ÌÌà àUpon€remand,€the€trial€court€is€instructed€to€review,€in€its€determination€ofÏconsecutive€sentencing,€where€not€mandated,€the€statutory€provisions€of€Tenn.ÏCode€Ann.€ðð€40„35„111(b),€ðð€40„35„115,€and€the€principles€announced€in€òòStateÏv.€Wilkersonóó,€905€S.W.2d€933,€938€(Tenn.€1995).€€Before€imposing€the€effectiveÏsentence,€the€trial€court€must€determine€if€the€aggregate€sentence€imposedÏreasonably€relates€to€the€severity€of€the€offenses€committed,€is€necessary€toÏprotect€the€public€from€further€criminal€conduct€by€the€appellant,€and€isÏconsistent€with€the€sentencing€principles€set€forth€in€the€Sentencing€Act.€ÏòòWilkersonóó,€905€S.W.2d€at€938„939.̛̜Ìà àFor€the€reasons€stated€above,€we€reverse€and€remand€the€four€cases€toÏthe€trial€court€for€resentencing€consistent€with€this€opinion.ÌÌÌÓÓÌà àà àà àà àà à____________________________________Ìà àà àà àà àà àDAVID€G.€HAYES,€JudgeÌÌÌÌÌCONCUR:ÌÌÌÌ__________________________________ÌJOE€B.€JONES,€Presiding€JudgeÌ̛̜Ì__________________________________ÌJOHN€H.€PEAY,€Judge