ÿWPCf …# VUNa %¯ 0(µbÝw@å4% 9 0lH 0D´ 0Jø 0TB 0^– 0hô 0r\ 0|Î 0†J 0Ð 1u` 0dÕ U>9U*wB)¡DCÊ B  AM* wzƒv~ývÓ{ D3N 0@ AOÁÆ 0DÖ D/ BI˜HP LaserJet 4SiHPPCL5MS,ü,,,,,ü0nLHÎ(ÖÃ9 Z ‹6Times New Roman RegularX($¡¡- ù- OQPQQURDSDTUEVWDXÓ€Ô¡¨ Äȸ¨¨¨3|xa((3üÝ$¤¤Ý ƒ!ÝÝ  Ýà  àòòÚ  Ú0Ú  Úóó(#Ã$òòÚ  Ú0Ú  Úóó2 ÿÿ0Indent1Ô2ÔÔ3  Ô2" ÿÿ0Indent2à0 àÔ2ÔÔ3  Ô2, ÿÿ0Indent3à0 àà0 àÔ2ÔÔ3  Ô26 ÿÿ0Indent4à0 àà0 àà0 àÔ2ÔÔ3  Ô2@ ÿÿ0Indent5à0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àÔ2ÔÔ3  Ô2J ÿÿ0Indent6à0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àÔ2ÔÔ3  Ô2T ÿÿ0Indent7à0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àÔ2ÔÔ3  Ô2^ ÿÿ0Indent8à0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àÔ2ÔÔ3  Ô ÿÿ?AGMSYaioIndent0I.A.1.a.(1)(a)i)a)P ÿÿ8Mac DefaultMac DefaultÓ ` °šXÓ< Œ 9p`(&Times New Roman< Œ 9p`(Arial% Line 7 d""""7Border 1dd d€-#Cþÿ << Gÿÿ Ý ƒ!ÝÑ  ÑÑ#€d#ÑÔ€ ÔÝ  ÝÔ€!ÔÔ€!ÔÓ  Óò òÔ YYY ÔFILEDÔ€!XÔÌÌMay€16,€1997ÌÌCecil€W.€CrowsonÌAppellate€Court€ClerkÔ  Ôó ó pÝ ƒ!ÝÑ#€d#ÑÔ€ ÔÝ  ÝÝ ƒ $Ýà àòòÚ  ÚÚ  ÚóóÝ  Ý€Ô€ ôÔÔ€!ÔAppellant€tried€to€raise€additional€issues€in€a€document€he€drafted€entitled€òòAndersóó€brief.€€InÏòòAnders€à0 àv.€State€of€Californiaóó,€87€S.Ct.€1396,€1400€(1967)€the€United€States€Supreme€Court€prescribedÏcertain€procedures€for€a€court€to€follow€where€appellate€counsel€finds€lack€of€meritorious€issues€toÏraise€on€appeal.€€òòAndersóó€has€no€applicability€here.€€Appellantððs€counsel€found€several€meritoriousÏissues€on€appeal€and€filed€a€brief€on€behalf€of€Appellant.€€Moreover,€in€Tennessee,€a€criminalÏdefendant€must€chose€between€self„representation€and€representation€by€counsel.€€òòState€v.ÏBurkhartóó,€541€S.W.2d€365,€371€(Tenn.€1976).€€Therefore,€we€decline€to€address€the€issues€raisedÏby€Appellant€in€his€òòAndersóó€brief.€€However,€if€Appellant€has€any€legitimate€complaints€concerningÏcounselððs€appellate€representation€he€may€seek€appropriate€post„conviction€relief.€€Ô€ ÔÔ€ XÔÌPtPtHHÚ(ÿáÿâùFG(üHHÚ(d'hStyl{WP}01•ÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃà Ãà Ãà Ãà Ãà ÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÐ ÐÐHHÐÐ  ÐÐ2ÐÐÿÿ¸æ$ÿÐÐHHÐÐÐÐÐÐÐÐ  ÐÐ ÐÐ ÐÑÑÑGenevaÑÑ ÑÑ € ÑÑ<Px–ÈÑÒÒÒ443!#4ÒÒ$ *$ÒÒ$*$ÒÒ ÿKK ÒÒ  Geneva ÒÒ  Geneva ÒÓ.,ÓÓÓÓ6ÓÓ ÓßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßÑGenevaÑÑ ÑÒ  h HD: Geneva ÒÒ  h HD: Geneva Ò$$$$'ÿÿdxd("ÿÿ$££Ò  ÒÒ  Ò€-‚ƒCþÿ<< CÿÿƒLevel 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5($$””ò òÚ  Ú1Ú  Úó ó„„'÷ÿ dxdüÿP PdÝ ƒ!ÝÔ . ÔÔ€ ÔÝ  ÝÑ ` ÑÒ  ÒÒ ° ÒÒ  ÒÒ „ ÒÑ\R AØ'\ÑÔ€!ÔÑ\R AØ'\ÑÑ€ÑÑ7€V~XXdìdÈ7ÑÑ  ÑÑ  ÑÓ  Óò òÙ€€ÙßR€%&#A1-j|` ç `€€@ÿRßÞ ÞÌIN€THE€COURT€OF€CRIMINAL€APPEALS€OF€TENNESSEEÌÌAT€NASHVILLEÌÌNOVEMBER€SESSION,€1996ÌÌÌÓ  ÓSTATE€OF€TENNESSEE,à àà à)à àC.C.A.€NO.€01C01„9603„CR„00084Ìà àà àà àà àà à)Ìó óà àAppellee,à àà àà àò ò)Ìà àà àà àà àà à)Ìà àà àà àà àà à)à àDAVIDSON€COUNTYÌVS.à àà àà àà àà à)à àÌà àà àà àà àà à)à àHON.€THOMAS€H.€SHRIVERó óÌò òTONY€G.€SMITH,ó óà àà àà àò ò)à àJUDGEó óÌà àà àà àà àà àò ò)ó óÌà àAppellant.à àà àà àò ò)à à(Direct€Appeal)Ìó óÌÌÓ  ÓÌÌòòÓ  ÓFOR€THE€APPELLANTóó:à àà àà àòòFOR€THE€APPELLEEóó:ÌÌDAVID€L.€VINCENTà àà àà àCHARLES€W.€BURSONÌTSCRN€#€3935à àà àà àà àAttorney€General€and€ReporterÌ906€Stahlman€BuildingÌNashville,€TN€€37201„1505à àà àM.€ALLISON€THOMPSONÌà àà àà àà àà àà àAssistant€Attorney€GeneralÌROBERT€N.€SKINNER,€JR.à àà à450€James€Robertson€ParkwayÌTSCRN€#€3576à àà àà àà àNashville,€TN€€37243Ì311€Church€StreetÌ316€Exchange€Buildingà àà àà àVICTOR€S.€JOHNSONÌNashville,€TN€€37201à àà àà àDistrict€Attorney€GeneralÌà àà àÌà àà àà àà àà àà àMARY€HAUSMANÌà àà àà àà àà àà àJAMES€SLEDGEÌà àà àà àà àà àà àAssistant€District€AttorneysÌà àà àà àà àà àà àWashington€Square€BuildingÌà àà àà àà àà àà à222€2nd€Avenue,€No.Ìà àà àà àà àà àà àNashville,€TN€€37201ÌÌÌÌOPINION€FILED€________________________ÌÌAFFIRMEDÌÌJERRY€L.€SMITH,€JUDGEÇòòò òÓ  ÓÔ€!„ÔOPINIONó óóóÔ€!ŠÔÌÌÌÓÓÓ  Óà àOn€May€16,€1995€Davidson€County€Criminal€Court€jury€found€AppellantÏTony€Smith€guilty€of€stalking€in€violation€of€Tennessee€Code€Annotated€SectionÏ39„17„315€(Supp.€1996)€and€attempted€first„degree€murder€in€violation€ofÏTennessee€Code€Annotated€Section€39„12„101€(1991).€€He€was€sentenced€toÏeleven€months€and€twenty„nine€days€for€stalking€and€twenty„eight€years€forÏattempted€murder.€€His€sentences€were€ordered€to€run€consecutively.€€OnÏappeal,€he€raises€two€issues× ƒ' ××  ×:€1)€whether€the€evidence€is€sufficient,€as€a€matterÏof€law,€to€sustain€his€convictions€for€attempted€first„degree€murder€and€stalking,Ïand€2)€whether€the€trial€court€committed€reversible€error€by€allowing€the€jury€toÏseparate€without€his€permission.€€ÌÌà àAfter€a€review€of€the€record,€we€affirm€the€judgment€of€the€trial€court.ÌÌÓ  ÓFactual€BackgroundÌÓ  Óà àIn€November€1992,€Donnia€Freeman,€the€victim,€and€Appellant€beganÏdating€while€Ms.€Freeman€was€separated€from€her€husband.€€The€relationshipÏwas€characterized€by€violence€and€physical€abuse.€€As€of€May€1994,€Ms.ÏFreeman€had€decided€to€leave€Appellant€and€had€communicated€that€intentionÏto€Appellant.€€On€May€10,€1994,€Appellant€went€to€the€American€Workshop,€aÏtelemarketing€company,€to€visit€Ms.€Freeman€at€work.€€Ms.€Freeman€askedÏAppellant€to€leave€after€he€began€fighting€with€her.€€Appellant€refused€to€leaveÏand€Ms.€Freeman€asked€her€manager€to€ask€Appellant€to€leave.€€When€Ms.ÏFreeman€finished€her€shift€and€walked€into€the€parking€lot,€AppellantÏapproached€her€again,€apparently€having€waited€for€Ms.€Freeman€to€finishÏwork.€€Appellant€again€started€yelling€at€Ms.€Freeman€and€aggressively€comingÏtoward€her€and€her€friend.€€Ms.€Freeman€threw€a€bottle€of€nail€polish€atÏAppellant.€€The€next€day,€Appellant€had€Ms.€Freeman€arrested.€€Parked€acrossÏthe€street,€Appellant€watched€her€being€placed€under€arrest.€Ìà àSometime€in€late€May,€the€manager€of€American€Workshop€received€aÏcall€from€Appellant.€€Appellant€told€the€manager€that€the€only€way€Ms.€FreemanÏwould€leave€Nashville€was€in€a€body€bag.Ìà àOn€Memorial€Day€weekend,€Mr.€Freeman€came€to€Nashville€to€visit€Ms.ÏFreeman€and€their€children.€€Appellant€arrived€at€Ms.€Freemanððs€houseÏunexpectedly.€€Ms.€Freeman€asked€him€to€leave€but€he€refused.€€Mr.€FreemanÏasked€him€to€leave€and€after€much€protest,€he€finally€left.Ìà àWhile€Ms.€Freeman€was€out€of€town,€Appellant€called€Cassandra€Holt,ÏMs.€Freemanððs€friend,€and€inquired€about€Ms.€Freemanððs€whereabouts.€€HeÏalso€threatened€Ms.€Freemanððs€life.€€€€When€Ms.€Freeman€returned€from€her€tripÏthere€were€approximately€twenty€threatening€messages€on€her€answeringÏmachine€from€Appellant€such€as€ð ðBitch,€youððre€dead.ðð€€After€receiving€theseÏthreatening€messages,€Ms.€Freeman€went€to€stay€with€another€friend,€LatonyaÏThompson.€€Having€forwarded€her€messages€to€Ms.€Thompsonððs€house,€sheÏreceived€even€more€threatening€messages€from€Appellant€such€as€ð ðBitch,€IððmÏgoing€to€fuck€you€up€when€I€see€you€and€you€canððt€hide.ðð€ÌÌà àOn€the€morning€of€June€3,€1994,€Appellant€called€Ms.€Holt€and€said,€ð ðTellÏDonnia€this€is€it;€Iððve€got€to€talk€to€her€today.€€I€need€to€know€something€today.ðð€ÏHe€also€called€Ms.€Freeman€and€said,€ð ðIððm€still€going€to€get€you.ðð€Ìà àShortly€after€6€p.m.€on€June€3,€Appellant€went€to€his€friend,€ThomasÏDouglasðð€house.€Uncertain€about€any€specific€times,€Mr.€Douglas€testified€that€toÏthe€best€of€his€memory,€Appellant€borrowed€his€car,€a€grey€Pontiac€Bonneville,Ïaround€7€p.m.€to€go€to€the€store€for€Mr.€Douglas.€€Appellant€and€a€man€ofÏmedium€build€returned€twenty€minutes€later.€€According€to€Mr.€Douglas,€againÏuncertain€as€to€exact€times,€the€pair€returned€around€8€p.m.€Appellant€received€aÏpage€and€was€informed€that€Ms.€Freeman€had€been€shot.€€€Mr.€Douglas€statedÏAppellant€left€the€Douglas€residence€around€10€p.m.Ìà àAccording€to€witnesses€at€Ms.€Freemanððs€place€of€employment,€aroundÏ8:30€p.m.€on€June€3,€a€man€of€medium€build€wearing€a€bandana€over€his€faceÏappeared€at€the€door€of€the€American€Workshop,€pointed€a€gun€at€Ms.ÏFreeman€and€fired€approximately€five€to€six€times.€€Ms.€Freeman€was€shot€inÏher€buttocks.€€The€gunman€made€no€demands€for€money€or€anything€else.€Ìà àShortly€after€the€shooting€a€man€of€medium€build€was€seen€running€upÏthe€hill€toward€a€Kroger€parking€lot€located€off€Charlotte€Avenue€near€where€theÏAmerican€Workshop€building€was€located.€€The€man€ran€up€to€a€dark€coloredÏPontiac€Bonneville€that€was€parked€in€the€parking€lot€with€its€lights€off.€€HeÏjumped€into€the€car€and€said,€ð ðRoll€man,€I€think€they€saw€me.ðð€€The€car€thenÏsped€away€from€the€scene.Ìà àAfter€the€shooting,€Ms.€Freemanððs€brother€called€Appellant€to€ask€if€heÏwas€involved€with€shooting€his€sister.Appellant€denied€any€involvement.€€DaysÏlater,€Ms.€Freemanððs€brother€received€a€call€from€someone€who€said,€ð ðSix€bulletsÏwasnððt€enough.ðð€€Ms.€Freemanððs€brother,€a€friend€of€Appellantððs,€recognized€theÏmanððs€voice€as€Appellantððs.ÌÌò òÓ  ÓI.€Sufficiency€of€the€Evidenceó óÓ  Óà àAppellant€maintains€that€the€evidenceÏpresented€at€trial€is€not€legally€sufficient€to€sustain€his€conviction€for€stalking€andÏattempted€first„degree€murder.€€When€an€appeal€challenges€the€sufficiency€ofÏthe€evidence,€the€standard€of€review€is€whether,€after€viewing€the€evidence€inÍthe€light€most€favorable€to€the€State,€any€rational€trier€of€fact€could€have€foundÏthe€essential€elements€of€the€crime€beyond€a€reasonable€doubt.€€òòJackson€v.ÏVirginia,óó€443€U.S.€307,€318€(1979);€òòState€v.€Evansóó,€838€S.W.2d€185,€190„91Ï(Tenn.€1992),€òòcert.€deniedóó,€114€S.€Ct.€740€(1994);€Tenn.€R.€App.€P.€13(e).€€OnÏappeal,€the€State€is€entitled€to€the€strongest€legitimate€view€of€the€evidence€andÏall€reasonable€or€legitimate€inferences€which€may€be€drawn€therefrom.€€òòState€v.ÏCabbageóó,€571€S.W.2d€832,€835€(Tenn.€1978).€€This€Court€will€not€reweigh€theÏevidence,€re„evaluate€the€evidence,€or€substitute€its€evidentiary€inferences€forÏthose€reached€by€the€jury.€€òòState€v.€Graceóó,€493€S.W.2d€474,€476€€(Tenn.€1973).€ÏAs€the€Supreme€Court€of€Tennessee€said€in€òòBolin€v.€Stateóó:ÌÒ  ÒÒ  ÒÓÓà0 àThis€well„settled€rule€rests€on€a€sound€foundation.€€The€trialÏjudge€and€the€jury€see€the€witnesses€face€to€face,€hear€theirÏtestimony€and€observe€their€demeanor€on€the€stand.€€Thus€theÏtrial€judge€and€jury€are€the€primary€instrumentality€of€justice€toÏdetermine€the€weight€and€credibility€to€be€given€to€the€testimonyÏof€witnesses.€€In€the€trial€forum€alone€is€there€humanÏatmosphere€and€the€totality€of€the€evidence€cannot€beÏreproduced€with€a€written€record€in€this€Court.€€ÌÌÒ  ÒÒ „ Ò405€S.W.2d€768€(1966).€€ÓÓThus,€a€jury€verdict€is€entitled€to€great€weight.Ìà àOnce€approved€by€the€trial€court,€a€jury€verdict€accredits€the€witnessesÏpresented€by€the€State€and€resolves€all€conflicts€in€favor€of€the€State.€€òòState€v.ÏHatchettóó,€560€S.W.2d€627€(Tenn.€1978);€òòState€v.€Townsendóó,€525€S.W.2d€842Ï(Tenn.€1975).€€The€credibility€of€witnesses,€the€weight€to€be€given€their€testimony,Ïand€the€reconciliation€of€conflicts€in€the€proof€are€matters€entrusted€exclusively€toÍthe€jury€as€trier€of€fact.€€òòState€v.€Sheffieldóó,€676€S.W.2d€542,€547€(Tenn.€1984).€€AÏjuryððs€guilty€verdict€removes€the€presumption€of€innocence€enjoyed€by€theÏdefendant€at€trial€and€raises€a€presumption€of€guilt.€€òòState€v.€Tuggleóó,€639ÏS.W.2d€913,€914€(Tenn.€1982).€€The€defendant€then€bears€the€burden€ofÏovercoming€this€presumption€of€guilt€on€appeal.€€òòState€v.€Brownóó,€551€S.W.2dÏ329,€331€(Tenn.€1977).Ìà àCriminal€attempt€is€defined€in€the€following€manner:ÌÒ  ÒÒ  ÒÓÓà0 àA€person€commits€criminal€attempt€who,€acting€with€the€kind€ofÏculpability€otherwise€required€for€the€offense:€(1)€[i]ntentionallyÏengages€in€action€or€causes€a€result€that€would€constitute€anÏoffense€if€the€circumstances€surrounding€the€conduct€were€asÏthe€person€believes€them€to€be;€(2)€[a]cts€with€intent€to€cause€aÏresult€that€is€an€element€of€the€offense,€and€believes€theÏconduct€will€cause€the€result€without€further€conduct€on€theÏpersonððs€part;€or€(3)€[a]cts€with€intent€to€complete€a€course€ofÏaction€or€cause€a€result€that€would€constitute€the€offense,€underÏthe€circumstances€surrounding€the€conduct€as€the€personÏbelieves€them€to€be,€and€the€conduct€constitutes€a€substantialÏstep€toward€the€commission€of€the€offense.Ì€€ÌÒ  ÒÒ „ ÒÓÓTenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€39„12„101(a)(1)„(3)(1991).€€First€degree€murder€is€theÏintentional,€premeditated€and€deliberate€killing€of€another.€€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€39„13„202(a)(1).€€One€is€responsible€for€an€offense€committed€by€another€if€theÏproof€shows€that€ð ðacting€with€the€intent€to€promote€or€assist€the€commission€ofÏthe€offense,€or€to€benefit€in€the€proceeds€or€results€of€the€offense,€the€personÏsolicits,€directs,€aids,€or€attempts€to€aid€another€person€to€commit€the€offense.ðð€ÏTenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€39„11„402(2).Ìà àIt€is€well„established€in€this€State€that€an€offense€may€be€proven€byÏcircumstantial€evidence€alone.€€òòPrice€v.€Stateóó,€589€S.W.2d€929,€931€(Tenn.€Crim.ÏApp.€1979).€€To€do€so,€the€evidence€must€not€only€be€consistent€with€the€guilt€ofÏthe€accused€but€it€must€also€be€inconsistent€with€his€innocence,€excluding€everyÏother€reasonable€theory€except€that€of€guilt.€€òòPruitt€v.€Stateóó,€460€S.W.2d€385,Ï390€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.€1970).€€Although€certainly€not€overwhelming,€theÏcircumstantial€evidence€submitted€at€trial€is€sufficient€for€a€rational€trier€of€fact€toÏconclude€beyond€a€reasonable€doubt€that€Appellant€is€criminally€responsible€forÏthe€actions€of€the€shooter.Ìà àIn€the€days€leading€up€to€the€shooting,€Appellant€repeatedly€threatenedÏthe€life€of€Ms.€Freeman.€€€On€the€day€of€the€shooting,€Appellant€called€Ms.ÏFreemanððs€friend,€Ms.€Holt€and€demanded€to€talk€to€Ms.€Freeman€that€day.€€ThisÏcall€suggested€that€drastic€action€was€imminent.€€The€evening€of€the€shooting,ÏAppellant€borrowed€his€friendððs€grey€Pontiac€Bonneville€to€go€to€the€store.€€€HeÏreturned€with€a€black€man€of€medium€build.€€Immediately€after€the€shooting,€aÏblack€man€of€medium€build€was€seen€jumping€into€the€getaway€car€„€a€greyÏPontiac€Bonneville€apparently€driven€by€someone€else.€€The€day€after€theÏshooting,€Appellant€called€Ms.€Freemanððs€brother€and€said,€ð ðSix€bullets€wasnððtÏenough.ðð€€€Although€Appellant€didnððt€identify€himself,€Ms.€Freemanððs€brother,€aÏlong„time€friend€of€Appellant,€recognized€the€voice€of€the€caller€as€that€ofÏAppellant.€€Immediately€after€being€notified€of€the€shooting,€Appellant€reactedÍwithout€concern€for€Ms.€Freemanððs€condition€or€where€she€was€being€treated.€ÏThis€was€in€drastic€contrast€to€his€historically€obsessive€concern€for€herÏwhereabouts.€Ìà àAt€the€time€of€the€commission€of€the€offense€and€before€a€1995€revision€ofÏthe€statute,€stalking€was€committed€by€a€person:ÌÒ  ÒÒ  ÒÓÓ(A)€[w]ho€repeatedly€follows€or€harasses€another€person€with€theÏintent€to€place€that€person€in€reasonable€fear€of€a€sexual€offense,Ïbodily€injury€or€death;€(B)€[w]hose€actions€would€cause€a€reasonableÏperson€to€suffer€substantial€emotional€distress;€and€(C)€[w]hoseÏactions€induce€emotional€distress€to€that€person.€€ÌÌÒ  ÒÒ „ ÒÓÓTenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€39„17„315€(Supp.€1996).€€ð ðRepeatedlyðð€is€defined€to€meanÏtwo€or€more€separate€occasions.€€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€39„17„315.€€Ìà àAppellant€repeatedly€followed€and€harassed€Ms.€Freeman€with€the€intentÏof€placing€her€in€fear€of€€bodily€injury€or€death.€€Appellant€came€to€Ms.ÏFreemanððs€place€of€work€in€early€May,€argued€with€her€and€would€not€leaveÏwhen€asked.€€Appellant€refused€to€leave€the€premises,€waiting€for€Ms.€FreemanÏin€the€parking€lot.€€When€Ms.€Freeman€tried€to€leave€Appellant€verbally€accostedÏher€at€which€point€she€threw€a€bottle€of€nail€polish€at€him.€€Appellant€had€herÏarrested€for€this€and€watched€from€across€the€street€as€she€was€taken€away.€ÏAppellant€told€a€number€of€witensses€that€he€was€going€to€kill€Ms.€Freeman€orÏharm€her€in€some€way.€€€When€Ms.€Freeman€returned€from€vacation€overÏMemorial€Day€weekend,€she€came€home€to€at€least€twenty€threateningÏmessages€on€her€answering€machine€such€as€ð ðBitch,€youððre€dead.ðð€€AppellantÍcame€to€her€house€unannounced€as€Ms.€Freeman€was€packing€to€leave€forÏvacation€and€would€not€leave€when€asked€to€do€so.€€€All€of€these€actionsÏwould€cause€a€reasonable€person€to€suffer€substantial€emotional€distress.€ÏAppellantððs€actions€did€in€fact€have€its€intended€result€as€Ms.€Freeman€finallyÏinvolved€her€husband€in€her€attempt€to€leave€Appellant.€€€Moreover,€Ms.ÏFreeman€did€not€return€to€her€job€after€the€shooting€and€even€moved€to€anotherÏstate..ÌÌÌÌò òÓ  ÓII.€Failure€to€Sequester€the€Juryó óÌÓ  Óà àAppellant€further€contends€that€the€trial€court€committed€reversible€error€byÏfailing€to€obtain€his€consent€before€allowing€the€jury€to€separate€at€the€end€ofÏeach€day€of€trial.€€Appellant€argues€that€òòState€v.€Furloughóó,€797€S.W.2d€631,€645Ï(Tenn.€Crim.€App.€1990)€stands€for€the€proposition€that€a€criminal€defendant€hasÏthe€right€to€sequestration€of€twelve€jurors.€€While€this€Court€recognized€such€aÏright€in€òòFurloughóó,€this€Court€also€acknowledged€that€this€right€could€be€waivedÏunder€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€Sec.€40„18„116€(1990).€€Section€40„18„116€provides€theÏfollowing:ÌÒ  ÒÒ  ÒÓÓIn€all€criminal€prosecutions€except€those€in€which€a€death€sentenceÏmay€be€rendered,€the€judge€of€the€criminal€court€may,€in€his€discretion,Ïwith€the€consent€of€the€defendant,€and€with€the€consent€of€the€districtÍattorney€general,€permit€the€jurors€to€separate€at€times€when€they€areÏnot€engaged€upon€the€actual€trial€or€deliberation€of€the€cases.ÌÌÒ  ÒÒ „ ÒÓÓIn€òòFurloughóó,€the€defense€objected€to€the€separation€of€jurors€several€times.€ÏòòFurloughóó,€797€S.W.2d€at€644„45.€€In€contrast,€Appellant€made€no€objection€evenÏwhen€during€voir€dire€the€prosecutors€informed€the€prospective€jurors€that€theyÏwould€not€be€sequestered€but€would€be€allowed€to€go€home€at€the€end€of€trialÏeach€day.€€By€failing€to€raise€the€issue€at€trial€when€any€prejudicial€effect€of€theÏerror€could€have€been€prevented,€Appellant€has€waived€this€issue€as€a€groundÏfor€relief.€€T.R.A.P.€36(a);€òòSeeóó€òòJones€v.€Stateóó,€915€S.W.2d€1,3€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.Ï1995).ÌÌà àWe€conclude€that€the€evidence€was€sufficient€to€sustain€AppellantððsÏconvictions€for€attempted€first„degree€murder€and€stalking.€€Furthermore,€weÏconclude€that€Appellant€has€waived€any€complaints€with€respect€to€the€lack€ofÏjury€sequestration.€€We€therefore€affirm€the€judgment€of€the€trial€court.ÌÌÓÓà àà àà àà àà à____________________________________Ìà àà àà àà àà àJERRY€L.€SMITH,€JUDGEÌÌÌÌCONCUR:ÌÌÌÌ___________________________________ÌJOHN€H.€PEAY,€JUDGEÌÌÌ___________________________________ÌDAVID€H.€WELLES,€JUDGE