ÿWPC¢ ƒI]·~;½ÛKŠÀ£û|ê+x h† ž–I-êÚW…Ñ ¼Yoäýß I×&)ÚÀâ<ÊÊ 9²µ±~+Ä™T¾³: ž¤®ßž¯?ñ…{8·ß‡*\ô ²;ç~^kØðéäUèK'ÎfÈè|}ðmŸ6X|5ŠêAˆÕ, Їg•6û”ÉÍÌšV¯Ží2À,›K7Ð"›£FÙeÃWß¾Œc=º¦Ô7ÜB¯#ÕÕVÅ4¤CÈ®±Í0¹ í®—€ÃÇóvû|‰ÕAŒL-’ùìsö\öꉞO £|÷ôÒ1…Ú±F»òSš/ΙÀx¤õÞy‚ãRá(Hzõ-þÔÑ9\ ‰UR­8a2Y» `BÑò÷fw!—ß~l¢s¤éäÛ=ÇJ´ÑµÔDÒÉûí£xµ•SžŽÈ͈¦Idä×OÜ7z'F̓ë꯵r0ɺC<¥ÄUÿYz­)#2-ÄÝ ã•ó’š(ß³âq?bó]ÜöxƒA›Év»Ÿ²íÕ¼~UX›"M¨>Ê$i ØÓìæöá /oŸåX2á’ùÑ(«m‰\×C¯ä*\<ŠF¤¼ÌKø"£šäÇÐýì^–K-Ëuol %™M =¾\bUN\ %ª 0ˆ°#Á8 Œù Ú… ^ _ zk Òå V· ¹ m» wÒ ÆÖ Æœ ÆbÆ(4îN  & E02YPA b‘ ^ó?Q cDk ¯ · ¿ Ç Ï × ß  ç  ñ  ûUN 0DSSSSSb———————————————————————————————————— 0럟ŸŸ BŠŠ 0¤§ D3K D-~ 0K«« ASöÆI 0¤ 0D³ A«÷(í€"  Z6Times New Roman Regular»(`£ª$¡¡Ñ€.ÑÑ8€½­»»d»»d8ÑÑ ý ÑÓ  Ó˜HP LaserJet 4000 Series PCL 6ÈÈÈÈÈÈÈÈ0˜C:\PROGRA~1\COREL\WORDPE~1\TEMPLATE\CUSTOM~1\CUSTOM~1\OPINION3.WPTC:\Program Files\Corel\WordPerfect Office 2000\Template\Custom WP Templates\Custom WP Templates\opinion3.wpt Šù(  ˜C:\PROGRA~1\COREL\WORDPE~1\TEMPLATE\CUSTOM~1\REVISE~1.WPTC:\Program Files\Corel\WordPerfect Office 2000\Template\Custom WP Templates\revised standard opinion.wptÿU‹ÿÀÀÀLevel 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5‚Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5„Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5…Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5ÖJ~'´¥¡H\Opinion Summary3|xG:\TECH\IB271T7\ADMIN\APPELL~1\ABCD.DAT?\Appellants Attorney Name & Appellant's Name.?\Appellees Attorney Name & Appellee's Name.YPG:\TECH\IB271T7\ADMIN\APPELL~1\ABCD.DATG:\TECH\IB271T7\ADMIN\Appellate Forms\abcd.dat££££££1 :Ý ƒR‹Æ$ÝÓ  Óà  àòòÚ  Ú1Ú  ÚóóÔ€X&}X»»ÔÝ  ÝÔ_ÔA€January€20,€1998€warrant€is€referred€to€in€an€amendment€dated€April€6,€1999,€and€aÐ ° ÐJanuary€12,€1998€warrant€is€referred€to€in€an€amended€warrant€dated€April€29,€1999.3456789101112(ÖÃ9 Z‹6Times New Roman Regular(#Ã$òòÚ  Ú0Ú  Úóó- ù-(|G2‹Æ$¤¤Ý ƒ£ª!ÝÑ€.ÑÑ8€Z¡»»dd8ÑÑ ý ÑÓ  ÓÝ  Ýà  àòòÚ  Ú0Ú  ÚóóÔ€X&}X»»Ô d(|3–x$££Ý ƒ£ª!ÝÑ€.ÑÑ8€Z¡»»dd8ÑÑ ý ÑÓ  ÓÝ  ÝVVVV'ÿÿdxd)!ÈÈÈÈdxdx( ±þ$’’ò òFigure€Ú  Ú1Ú  Úó ó^_X`YEþÿ<<CÿÿƒLevel 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5(|3–x$¢¢Ý ƒ£ª!ÝÑ€.ÑÑ8€Z¡»»dd8ÑÑ ý ÑÓ  ÓÝ  Ý($$””ò òÚ  Ú1Ú  Úó óX[Z&OLE 2.0 Box <=8ÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿCÿÿ HKKKKÝ ƒ£ª!ÝÑ€.ÑÑ8€Z¡»»ddÈ8ÑÑ ý ÑÓ  ÓÝ  ÝÔ_ÔÔ€¼Z¡»»»ÔÔ‡¼Z¡»»¼Z¡ÔÑ8€&}XXdæ»»d8Ñà@HHìàÔ#†¼Z¡»»¼Z¡ª#ÔIN€THE€COURT€OF€CRIMINAL€APPEALS€OF€TENNESSEEˆÐ ° Ðà@§§$ìàAT€NASHVILLEÔ‡¼Z¡»»¼Z¡ÔˆÐ ¾ ÐÔ#†¼Z¡»»¼Z¡—#ÔÔ‡X&}X»¼Z¡ÔÌò òÔ#†¼Z¡»XX&}ï#ÔÔ‡¼Z¡»»¼Z¡ÔÔ% ‡ ÔÓ  ÓSTATE€OF€TENNESSEEÔ%†TÔòòóó€v.€MARILYN€Ô_ÔSKAGGSÔ_ÔÔ#†¼Z¡»»¼Z¡5#ÔÔ‡X&}X»¼Z¡Ôó óÐ ² ÐÓaÓà  àÌà@z z ìàò òDirectÔ% ‡ ÔÔ%†ZÔ€Appeal€from€the€Circuit€Ô% ‡ ÔCourt€Ô%†‘Ôfor€Ô% ‡ ÔWayneÔ%† ¹Ô€CountyˆÐ ¦ ö Ðà@¨¨ìàNo.€Ô% ‡! Ô10,794„10,796;€10,673;€11,067;€11,068Ô%†!Ô€€€€€€Ô% ‡" ÔStella€Ô_ÔHargroveÔ_Ô,€JudgeÔ%†"XԈРŒ Ü ÐÌÌà@ìì*ìàßA€V) °°` d€÷E<= ` A߈Ð > Ž  ÐÌà@Ç Ç ìàNo.€Ô% ‡# ÔM1999„00428„CCA„R3„CDÔ%†#DÔ€„€Decided€July€25,€Ô_Ô2000Ô_ԈР3ƒ  ÐÌßA€V) °°` dE<þ` Aßó óÔ% ‡ ÔÔ%† ÔÐ ÿO  ÐÌThe€Defendant€pleaded€guilty€to€one€count€of€aggravated€burglary,€one€count€of€theft,€and€threeÐ ôD  Ðcounts€of€forgery.€€The€Defendant€was€sentenced€to€serve€sixty€days€in€jail€followed€by€six€years€ofÐ Ú*  Ðsupervised€probation.€€Subsequently,€the€Defendant's€probation€officer€alleged€that€the€DefendantÐ À Ðviolated€the€terms€of€her€probation€for€numerous€reasons.€€Following€a€hearing,€the€Defendant'sÐ ¦ö Ðprobation€was€revoked.€€The€Defendant€now€argues€the€following:€(1)€that€the€trial€court€erred€inÐ ŒÜ Ðadmitting€as€an€exhibit€a€computer€printout€of€summary€notes,€(2)€that€the€trial€court€erred€inÐ r Ðadmitting€as€an€exhibit€a€faxed€copy€of€an€affidavit€in€lieu€of€the€actual€affidavit,€and€(3)€that€theÐ X¨ Ðcourt€erred€in€revoking€the€Defendant's€probation.€€After€a€review€of€the€record€and€applicable€law,Ð >Ž Ðwe€find€no€merit€to€the€Defendant's€contentions€and€thus€affirm€the€judgment€of€the€trial€court.Ð $t ÐÌò òÔ% ‡$ ÔTenn.€R.€App.€P.€3€Appeal€as€of€RightÔ%†$l Ô;€Judgment€of€the€Ô% ‡% ÔCircuit€Court€affirmed.Ô%†%Á Ôó óÐ ð@ ÐÌòòÔ#†¼Z¡»àX&}ë#ÔÔ‡X&}X.¼Z¡ÔÔ_ÔWedemeyerÔ_Ô,óó€J.,€delivered€the€opinion€of€the€court,€in€whichòòÔ% ‡& ÔÔ%†&µ Ô,€Smith,€J.óó€and€òòÔ% ‡' ÔWilliams,€J.Ô%†'é Ôóó,€joined.Ð ¼  ÐÌÔ% ‡ ÔRandy€Ô_ÔHillhouseÔ_Ô€for€the€Defendant,€Marilyn€Ô_ÔSkaggsÔ_Ô.Ô%†5 ÔÐ ˆØ ÐÌÔ% ‡ ÔÔ%†Û ÔPaul€G.€Summers,€Attorney€General€and€Reporter,€and€Lucian€D.€Ô_ÔGeiseÔ_Ô,€Assistant€Attorney€GeneralÐ T¤ Ðfor€the€appellee,€State€of€Tennessee.Ð : Š  ÐÌà@55'ìàò òOPINIONó óÔ#†¼Z¡»XX&}5 #ÔòòóóÔ% € ÔÔ€X&}X»¼Z¡ÔˆÐ "V" ÐÌÓÓà  àOn€April€10,€1997,€the€Defendant€was€placed€on€six€years€of€supervised€probation€as€theÐ Ò#"$ Ðresult€of€pleading€guilty€to€aggravated€burglary,€theft,€and€three€counts€of€forgery.€€€On€January€9,Ð ž%î & Ð1998,€approximately€nine€months€after€the€Defendant€began€probation,€a€probation€violation€reportÐ j'º"( Ðâ âwas€prepared€by€Laurie€Wade,€the€Defendant's€probation€officer.€€Although€not€a€part€of€the€record,Ð 6)†$*ý¾ Ðapparently€a€warrant€dated€January€12,€1998€or€January€20,€1998׃×Ý ƒ)#ÃÝòòÚ  Ú1Ú  ÚóóÝ  Ý×  ×€was€issued€by€the€trial€court,Ð ° Ðâ âpresumably€containing€the€allegations€raised€in€the€probation€violation€report€of€January€9,€1998.€Ð |Ì ÐThese€allegations€were€that€the€Defendant€had€failed€to€obey€the€law,€failed€to€report€arrests€to€herÐ H˜ Ðprobation€officer,€failed€to€inform€her€probation€officer€before€changing€her€residence€orÐ  d Ðemployment,€failed€to€pay€required€fees,€and€failed€to€observe€special€conditions€by€failing€toÐ à 0 Ðmaintain€"timely€and€substantial€payments€to€the€Circuit€Court€of€Wayne€County."€€In€anÐ ¬ ü  Ð"AMENDMENT€TO€WARRANT"€dated€April€6,€1999,€it€was€further€alleged€that€the€DefendantÐ xÈ  Ðfailed€to€obey€the€law€by€being€arrested€for€driving€on€a€revoked€license€on€March€8,€1999€and€beingÐ D”  Ðcharged€with€passing€five€worthless€checks€in€Wayne€County,€Tennessee.€€In€yet€a€secondÐ ` Ð"AMENDMENT€TO€WARRANT"€dated€April€29,€1999,€the€Defendant€was€accused€of€furtherÐ Ü, Ðviolating€her€probation€on€April€1,€1999€by€testing€positive€for€marijuana€use.€€Also€added€wereÐ ¨ø Ðallegations€that€the€Defendant€had€been€charged€with€aggravated€assault,€assault€on€a€minor,€and€fiveÐ tÄ Ðworthless€check€violations.€€The€warrant€alleges€that€these€charges€"have€been€bound€over€to€theÐ @ ÐWayne€County€Grand€Jury."€€Ð  \ ÐÌà  àAfter€a€hearing,€the€trial€court€revoked€the€Defendant's€probation,€finding€that€the€allegationsÐ ¤ô Ðagainst€the€Defendant€were€proven€by€a€preponderance€of€the€evidence€and€that€any€one€of€theÐ p!À  Ðviolations€was€sufficient€cause€to€revoke€the€Defendant's€probation.€€The€Defendant€now€contendsÐ <#Œ" Ðthat€the€trial€court€erred€in€revoking€her€probation.€€€Ô‡(X&}XXX&}ÔWe€respectfully€disagree.Ð %X $ ÐÌà  àWhen€a€trial€court€determines€by€a€preponderance€of€the€evidence€that€a€probationer€hasÐ  (ð#( Ðviolated€the€conditions€of€his€or€her€probation,€the€trial€court€has€the€authority€to€revoke€probation.€Ð ° ÐTenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€40„35„311.€€Ô#†X&}XX(X&}M#ÔÔ‡X&}XXX&}ÔThe€decision€to€revoke€probation€is€in€the€sound€discretion€of€theÐ |Ì Ðtrial€judge.€€òòState€v.€Mitchellóó,€810€S.W.2d€733,€735€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.€1991).€Ô#†X&}XXX&}Ô#ÔÔ‡(X&}XXX&}Ô€The€judgment€of€theÐ H˜ Ðtrial€court€will€be€upheld€on€appeal€unless€there€has€been€an€abuse€of€discretion.€€òòState€v.Ð  d ÐWilliamsonóó,€619€S.W.2d€145,€146€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.1981).€€To€find€an€abuse€of€discretion€in€aÐ à 0 Ðprobation€revocation€case,€the€record€must€be€void€of€any€substantial€evidence€that€would€supportÐ ¬ ü  Ðthe€trial€courtððs€decision€that€a€violation€of€the€conditions€of€probation€occurred.€€òòState€v.€Grearóó,€568Ð xÈ  ÐS.W.2d€285,€286€(Tenn.1978);€€òòState€v.€Ô_ÔDelpÔ_Ôóó,€614€S.W.2d€395,€398€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.1980).€€ProofÐ D”  Ðof€a€probation€violation€is€sufficient€if€it€allows€the€trial€court€to€make€a€conscientious€and€intelligentÐ ` Ðjudgment.€€òòState€v.€Miltonóó,€673€S.W.2d€555,€557€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.1984).€€Ô#†X&}XX(X&}Á#ÔÔ‡(X&}XXX&}ÔÐ Ü, ÐÔ#†X&}XX(X&}z#ÔÌà  àIn€this€case,€the€Defendant€was€alleged€to€have€violated€her€probation€by€committingÐ tÄ Ðadditional€criminal€offenses.€€She€admitted€being€convicted€of€numerous€forgery€charges€in€AlabamaÐ @ Ðand€two€misdemeanor€charges€in€Tennessee,€all€subsequent€to€being€placed€on€probation.€Ð  \ ÐConcerning€the€Alabama€convictions,€the€Defendant€contends€that€the€trial€court€erred€in€admittingÐ Ø( Ðinto€evidence€a€copy€of€Alabama€Judicial€Information€System's€action€summary€for€the€Defendant.€Ð ¤ô ÐWe€conclude€that€this€evidence€was€properly€admitted€by€the€trial€court.€€The€document€is€signedÐ p!À  Ðby€the€Circuit€Court€judge€and€certified€by€the€court€clerk.€€It€is€admissible€under€Tennessee€RulesÐ <#Œ" Ðof€Evidence€803(22)€and€is€cumulative€to€the€Defendant's€own€testimony.Ð %X $ ÐÌà  àIn€this€case,€the€Defendant€was€alleged€to€have€violated€her€probation€by€using€marijuana.€Ð  (ð#( ÐAt€the€hearing,€she€admitted€using€marijuana€while€on€probation.€€Concerning€this€allegation,€theÐ l*¼%* ÐDefendant€contends€that€the€trial€court€erred€in€admitting€into€evidence€a€facsimile€of€an€affidavitÐ 8,ˆ', Ðfrom€Dr.€Timothy€A.€Robert,€Assistant€Laboratory€Director€of€Aegis€Analytical€Laboratories,€Inc.,Ð ° Ðwhich€stated€that€the€Defendant€tested€positive€for€"recent€and€regular€use€of€marijuana."€€The€trialÐ |Ì Ðcourt€admitted€this€affidavit€into€evidence€pursuant€to€Tennessee€Code€Annotated€ðð€40„35„311(c)(1),Ð H˜ Ðsubject€to€the€original€being€"filed€as€a€late€filed€exhibit."€€The€original€affidavit€apparently€has€neverÐ  d Ðbeen€filed€as€part€of€the€record€in€this€case,€but€we€find€no€error€by€the€trial€court.€€We€conclude€thatÐ à 0 Ðthe€facsimile€of€the€affidavit€was€properly€admitted€by€the€trial€court€pursuant€to€Tennessee€CodeÐ ¬ ü  ÐAnnotated€ðð€40„35„311(c)(1),€subject€to€the€original€being€"filed€as€a€late€filed€exhibit."€€Since€theÐ xÈ  Ðoriginal€was€not€filed€by€the€state,€the€lab€results€are€not€admissible€evidence€of€the€Defendant'sÐ D”  Ð"recent€and€regular€use€of€marijuana."€€However,€the€Defendant's€own€testimony€on€this€issue€isÐ ` Ðsufficient€evidence€to€support€the€trial€court's€revocation€of€probation.Ð Ü, ÐÌà  àThere€need€only€be€one€violation€of€the€conditions€of€probation€to€support€revocation,€and€Ð tÄ Ðin€this€case€the€Defendant€has€admitted€to€at€least€three€violations.€€The€Defendant€admitted€that€sheÐ @ Ðfailed€to€regularly€meet€with€her€probation€officer€and€testified€that€the€reason€was€because€she€wasÐ  \ Ðincarcerated€in€Alabama€on€forgery€convictions.€€The€record€shows€that€the€Defendant€met€with€herÐ Ø( Ðprobation€officer€in€July€and€August€of€1997,€but€failed€to€meet€with€her€again€until€August€of€1998.€Ð ¤ô ÐAt€that€time,€the€Defendant€informed€the€probation€officer€that€she€had€been€incarcerated€in€AlabamaÐ p!À  Ðon€fourteen€counts€of€forgery.€€Beginning€in€August€1998,€the€Defendant€only€met€with€herÐ <#Œ" Ðprobation€officer€on€a€"fairly€regular"€basis.€€The€Defendant€clearly€violated€the€conditions€of€herÐ %X $ Ðprobation€order€requiring€that€she€regularly€report€to€her€probation€officer€and€that€she€not€commitÐ Ô&$"& Ðany€further€criminal€acts.€€The€Defendant€also€admitted€to€regular€marijuana€use€which€directlyÐ  (ð#( Ðviolates€the€condition€of€her€probation€order€that€states€that€the€Defendant€not€use€or€have€marijuanaÐ l*¼%* Ðin€her€possession.€Ð 8,ˆ', Їà  àThe€evidence€at€the€probation€revocation€hearing€established€that€the€Defendant€violated€theÐ ° Ðterms€and€conditions€of€her€probation.€€The€trial€court,€therefore,€had€the€authority€to€revoke€herÐ |Ì Ðprobation.€€òòSeeóó€Tenn.€Code.€Ann.€ðð€40„35„311(d).€€The€record€does€not€indicate€that€the€trial€courtÐ H˜ Ðabused€its€discretion€in€exercising€such€authority.Ð  d ÐÌà  àAccordingly,€the€judgment€of€the€trial€court€is€affirmed.Ð ¬ ü  Ð