WPC* Uaj* wwpY5c(29 `Ǡ'U|(עvgT"ve(0^PkS.]U\S]?Cruq3-#.kB7{{חBsŴQ{=r L>59Vt2 kkp(>E ,3Ǫjނ1bӇ4%5"8C \q~Gerf3,=f툗}FZ엥yWDt-gy y[}u9抍{hbʧ@vM|Β-9Vtfmu&қ|cvF?!WSؗ# =uFUmsv~O9qWУ鹌ImBl˴uL%m \8Cv: |WwkTbasP4 X& UGN, %F w@L 0 U:h 4  0   0D U:)cU:U:7U: EU:/iU: "U:&U:&,'U:J(J(J(J( B((((((((((( D3((( 0D(((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((( AO)g)g) 0D-* D/q* B*X =D>?D@MSVUWUXUYӀ(`$TR[A' Legal3'A' Legal3'T7GXXdXXd7  ,cAZ"Arial Regularh&3|xd((3 $ `!TR[A' Legal3'A' Legal3'T7XXdXXd7    `   0  (#$  0  ,  AZ"Arial Regular #XX #  @T@R[A' Legal3'A' Legal3'T7XXdXXd7 @  `   1    Theappellantallegesinhispetitionthathislegalnameisnow Ishaaq.Noproofofthis  assertionisincludedintherecord.Accordingly,absentthisprooforanorderofamendment,weusethenameunderwhichhewasconvictedforpurposesofidentitywithpriorproceedings. ` Inthisregard,wenotethisistheappellantsfifthproceedingchallengingdirectlyorcollaterallyhisarmedrobberyconvictions.Inaddition,theappellanthasfiledfivecivilproceedingswhileincarceratedallegingvariouscivilrightsviolations.  $    1     SXXSTheappellantallegesinhispetitionthathislegalnameisnow Ishaaq.Noproofofthis  assertionisincludedintherecord.Accordingly,absentthisprooforanorderofamendment,weusethenameunderwhichhewasconvictedforpurposesofidentitywithpriorproceedings.  Inthisregard,wenotethisistheappellantsfifthproceedingchallengingdirectlyorcollaterallyhisarmedrobberyconvictions.Inaddition,theappellanthasfiledfivecivilproceedingswhileincarceratedallegingvariouscivilrightsviolations.,cAZ"Arial Regular,  AZ"Arial Regular  $    2    X#VXXXX X#VTheappellanthasfailedtocomplywithTenn.CodeAnn.2921107(b)(2)(1980)requiring  productionoflegalprocessrelevanttoandformingthegroundsfortheallegedillegalrestraint,whichwouldincludeindictmentsandjudgmentsofconviction.Thisnoncompliancesubjectsthepetitiontodismissal.,  AZ"Arial Regular  $    3    X#VXXXX X#VWenotethatinapriorpetitionforhabeascorpusrelief,theappellantarguedthatheshouldhave  beensentencedunderthe1989CriminalSentencingReformAct.SeeStateexrel.Stewartv.McWherter,  857S.W.2d875(Tenn.Crim.App.1992),perm.toappealdenied,(Tenn.1993).,  AZ"Arial Regular #XX  @T@R[A' Legal3'A' Legal3'T7XXdXXd7 @  `   2     #TheappellanthasfailedtocomplywithTenn.CodeAnn.2921107(b)(2)(1980)  requiringproductionoflegalprocessrelevanttoandformingthegroundsfortheallegedillegalrestraint,whichwouldincludeindictmentsandjudgmentsofconviction.Thisnoncompliancesubjectsthepetitiontodismissal.   `   2    X#VXXXX X#VTheappellanthasfailedtocomplywithTenn.CodeAnn.2921107(b)(2)(1980)  requiringproductionoflegalprocessrelevanttoandformingthegroundsfortheallegedillegalrestraint,whichwouldincludeindictmentsandjudgmentsofconviction.Thisnoncompliancesubjectsthepetitiontodismissal.,  AZ"Arial Regular   `   1    SXXSTheappellantallegesinhispetitionthathislegalnameisnow Ishaaq.Noproofofthis  assertionisincludedintherecord.Accordingly,absentthisprooforanorderofamendment,weusethenameunderwhichhewasconvictedforpurposesofidentitywithpriorproceedings. ` Inthisregard,wenotethisistheappellantsfifthproceedingchallengingdirectlyorcollaterallyhisarmedrobberyconvictions.Inaddition,theappellanthasfiledfivecivilproceedingswhileincarceratedallegingvariouscivilrightsviolations. #XX #  @T@R[A' Legal3'A' Legal3'T7XXdXXd7 @  `   3    Wenotethatinapriorpetitionforhabeascorpusrelief,theappellantarguedthathe  shouldhavebeensentencedunderthe1989CriminalSentencingReformAct.SeeStateexrel.  Stewartv.McWherter,857S.W.2d875(Tenn.Crim.App.1992),perm.toappealdenied,(Tenn.  1993).,cAZ"Arial Regular,  AZ"Arial Regular XXXX XX   Ad FILED4     July23,1999  CecilCrowson,Jr.# 4AppellateCourt  Clerk ,cAZ"Arial Regular d'dxd(3$ !  -C<< CLevel 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5($$   1  ' dxdP Pd `!TR[A' Legal3'A' Legal3'T7XXdXXd7    Yr*<,(j 8 `@E  tt0"HrY@. . INTHECOURTOFCRIMINALAPPEALSOFTENNESSEE  @(ATKNOXVILLE@%JUNESESSION,1999ALONZOSTEWART, h   ) | t  `     h   )  No.03C019810CR00380 h`  ` Appellant   h   ) TL   `     h   )  MORGANCOUNTY @8  vs. `     h   ) ,$   `     h   )  Hon.E.EugeneEblen,Judge   STATEOFTENNESSEE, h   )    `     h   )  (WritofHabeasCorpus)    ` Appellee   h   )    FortheAppellant:   h     FortheAppellee: ~  JoeH.Walker    h     PaulG.Summers  RJ PublicDefender   h     AttorneyGeneralandReporter >6 1191/2EastBroadway h  $ LenoirCity,TN37771 h     EllenH.Pollack     `     h     AssistantAttorneyGeneral  (#    `     h     CriminalJusticeDivision `     h     425FifthAvenueNorth `     h     2dFloor,CordellHullBuilding `     h     Nashville,TN372430493 x   (#  !  `  `     h      `     h     ScottMcCluen  @$8   `     h     DistrictAttorneyGeneral  `     h     RogerDelp  &#  `     h     Asst.DistrictAttorneyGeneral `     h     P.O.Box703 `     h     Kingston,TN37763OPINION=RDER=>>FILED:򀀀 ..&'+ AFFIRMED?PURSUANTTORULE20? DavidG.Hayes  x4p-2 Judge  d5\.3S  X3 XXX@+ OPINION    ` Theappellant,AlonzoStewart,alsoknownasIshaaq@S SSS@@ @  #  1      ׀appealsasofright,   fromthesummarydismissalofhisprosepetitionforthewritofhabeascorpus.The   appellantallegesinhispetitionthatheiscurrentlyservinganeffective120yearsentenceintheDepartmentofCorrectionstemmingfromfive1983armedrobberyconvictionsinDavidsonCounty.Theseconvictionswereaffirmedbythiscourtondirectappeal.SeeStatev.Stewart,No.842III(Tenn.Crim.App.atNashville,Oct. (  24,1984).@M@MM@M@@@@  #  2      ׀Accordingtohispetition,theserobberiesoccurredonvariousdates  beforeJuly1,1982,theeffectivedateofthe1982CriminalSentencingReformAct;however,hissentencingwasconductedaftertheeffectivedateandinaccordancewiththe1982Act.Baseduponthisfact,hearguesonappeal(1)sentencinghimunderthe1982Actresultedin enhancedsentencesandwas inviolationoftheexpostfactolawand(2)thereasonabledoubtjuryinstructionwasunconstitutional. ` Afterreview,weaffirmdismissalofthepetition. ` First,theappellantcontendsthatsentencinghimundertheprovisionsofthe1982SentencingAct,ratherthanthe1975SentencingActresultedinhissentencesbeing enhanced.@( @@( @  #  3      ׀Followinghis1983juryconvictionforfivecountsofarmed *#& robbery,hewassentencedto40yearsoneachcount.Becauseofpartial,consecutivesentencing,thetrialcourtimposedaneffectivesentenceof120years.Stewart,No.842IIIn.2.Inhispetition,theappellantalleges, [i]ncaseswherethe   juryfailedtostipulatehowthesentencewastobeserved(inpriorlaw),thesentencewastobeservedconcurrently,citingRule32(c)(1),Tenn.R.Crim.P.andRayv.State,576S.W.2d598(Tenn.Crim.App.1978).Theappellantsreliance h`  uponRule32andthecaseofRayv.Stateasauthorityforhispositionismisplaced. H@  AsrespondedbytheStateinitsMotiontoDismiss, undereitherJurySentencingorthe1982JudgeSentencingAct,thedeterminationofwhethersentencesranconcurrentlyorconsecutivelytoeachotheralwaysrestedwiththeCourtandnotthejury. ` Moreimportantly,however,anissueofenhancementorexcessivesentencewillnotsupportaclaimforhabeascorpusrelief.HabeascorpusreliefislimitedandavailableinTennesseeonlywhenthefaceofthejudgmentrenderedrevealsthattheconvictingcourtwaswithoutjurisdictionorauthorityovertheappellantorthattheappellantssentenceofimprisonmenthasexpired.Archerv.State,851S.W.2d %  157,164(Tenn.1993);Passarellav.State,891S.W.2d619,627(Tenn.Crim.App. &" 1994).Accordingly,excludingcaseswherethesentencehasexpired,habeascorpusreliefisgrantedonlyforavoidjudgments,i.e., oneinwhichthejudgmentisfaciallyinvalidbecausethecourtdidnothavethestatutoryauthoritytorendersuchjudgment.Dykesv.Compton,978S.W.2d528,529(Tenn.1998)(citingArcher, h.`'* 851S.W.2dat161).If,fromthefaceofthepetition,thereviewingcourtfindsnothingtoindicatethattheappellantschallengedconvictionsmightbevoidornotentitledtoanyrelief,thecourtshalldismissthepetitionandrefusetheissuanceofthewrit.Tenn.CodeAnn.2921101,109(1980).Becausewefindtheappellantspetitionfailstoestablishthathisconvictionswerevoidorthathissentenceshaveexpired,thisissueiswithoutmerit. 926 Ї ` Next,theappellantcontendsthatthereasonabledoubtjuryinstructionsubmittedathistrialwasconstitutionallyinfirm.Again,noauthenticated reasonabledoubtjuryinstructionisincludedwithintherecord.Evenso,challengestoajuryinstructionarenotcognizablewithinthecontextofastatehabeascorpusproceeding.SeeHallv.Mills,No.01C019510CV00339(Tenn.  Crim.App.atNashville,Aug.1,1996),perm.toappealdenied,(Tenn.1996);Voss h`  v.Raney,No.02C019501CC00022(Tenn.Crim.App.atJackson,Aug.2,1995), H@  perm.toappealdenied,(Tenn.1995).Moreover,theUnitedStatesSixthCircuit (  CourtofAppealsandtheappellatecourtsofthisstatehaveupheldthevalidityofthisstatespatterninstructiononreasonabledoubt.SeeAustinv.Bell,126F.3d  843,84647(6thCir.1997);Statev.Nichols,877S.W.2d722,734(Tenn.1994),  cert.denied,513U.S.1114,115S.Ct.909(1995);Pettyjohnv.State,885S.W.2d  364,36566(Tenn.Crim.App.),perm.toappealdenied,(Tenn.1994).Thisissueis  withoutmerit. ` Moreover,weareunabletotreattheappellantspetitionasoneforpostconvictionrelief.SeeTenn.CodeAnn.4030205(c)(1997).Postconviction %  reliefmustbefiledinthecountyoftheappellantsconviction,DavidsonCounty,andnotMorganCountyCriminalCourt.Tenn.CodeAnn.4030204,205(c)(1997).Additionally,theappellantsconvictionsbecamefinalinOctoberof1984.See *#& Stewart,No.842IIIThus,undertheapplicablestatuteoflimitation,theappellant ,%( haduntilJuly1,1989,tofileapostconvictionpetition.Again,astheinstantpetitionwasnotfileduntilJuly28,1998,thetrialcourtcorrectlydismissedthepetition.Accordingly,apetitionforpostconvictionreliefistimebarred.SeeAbstonv.State, (2 +. 749S.W.2d487(Tenn.Crim.App.),permtoappealdenied,(Tenn.1988). 4-0  ` Fortheforegoingreasons,thetrialcourtssummarydismissalofthepetitionisaffirmed.#XXX X#V # 926 ЇVVWW `     h   ____________________________________ `     h   DAVIDG.HAYES,JudgeXXCONCUR:_______________________________________JOHNH.PEAY,Judge_______________________________________JOHNEVERETTWILLIAMS,Judge