WPC , ZŘ2c444mep*n^ hvi^<ۧUnj&;=G؀|LP3Ear T쀚8%Z7ȩ]wWeuؖ`4#K4>E{$}z&~;Pyt'lw܋'q\jNbv9@q=!gY/7D#Z*6VhW'M |fJ$ݣAVLR}z}bd{=&tijkaF4ߐ3y\ : ukv):z!_:ZTimes New Roman Bold Italic((3~v$ !  TR[A'LEGAL3'A' Legal3'T   XXXX XX=XX XX      0  (#$  0   X#XX X(K XX#   Ad FILEDX#X (K  July20,1999CecilW.CrowsonAppellateCourtClerkdAM ,cAZ"Arial Regular X#XX X(K XX#   Ad FILEDX#X (K  July19,1999CecilW.CrowsonAppellateCourtClerkdAM ,cAZ"Arial Regular d'dxd(3$ !  -C<< CLevel 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5($$   1  ' dxdP Pd !  TR[A'LEGAL3'A' Legal3'T   XXXX XX=XX XX  7=XXdd7  X5XX= }5r*<,(j 8` `@E ` 8ttxPX  rr*<,(j 8` `@E ` 8ttxPX  r@ D X#X }INTHECOURTOFCRIMINALAPPEALSOFTENNESSEE@rr)DATNASHVILLEo[X` hDp x (#%'0*,.8135@8:<H?ACXoANTONIOL.SWEATT, h    D ) `  `     h    D ) p C.C.A.NO.01C019811CR00454 L    ` Appellant,   h    D ) p (No.90S1362Below) 8   `     h    D ) p DAVIDSONCOUNTY  $ t VS. `     h    D )  `  `     h    D ) p TheHon.SteveDozier  L  STATEOFTENNESSEE, h    D )  8    `     h    D )  p (DismissalofPostConvictionPetition)  $   ` Appellee.   h    D )    `     h    D ) p AFFIRMEDPURSUANTTORULE20   @kk+DORDER  p  `  ThismatterisbeforetheCourtuponthestatesmotionrequestingthatthejudgmentintheabovestyledcausebeaffirmedpursuanttoRule20,TennesseeCourtofCriminalAppealsRules.Theappellantopposesthemotion. `  OnDecember13,1990,thepetitionerpledguiltytotwocountsofaggravatedrapewithanagreedsentenceof25yearsintheTennesseeDepartmentofCorrection.HefiledapostconvictionpetitiononJune7,1993,however,aftercounselwasappointeydy,zhezwithdrewthepetitiononNovember4,1993.Thereafter,onMarch20,1996,thepetitionerfiledasecondpostconvictionpetition.Counselwasappointed,andtwoamendedpetitionswerefiled.AhearingwasheldonFebruary19,1997,atwhichthetrialcourtheldthatthepetitionwasbarredbythestatuteoflimitationsbutreservedrulingonanissueregardingtheindictment,pendingtheSupremeCourtsdecisioninStatev.Hill,954  )\$( S.W.2d725(Tenn.1997).UponthereleaseoftheSupremeCourtsopinioninHill,the *(&* trialcourtdeniedthepetition. `  Thepetitionerconcedesthatthispetitionforpostconvictionreliefwasfiledoutsidethestatuteoflimitations.However,hearguesthathewasleadtobelievethathewouldbereleasedafterserv{ic{ing30%ofhissentence,andtherefore,thestatuteoflimitationsshouldhavebeentolleduntilafterheserved30%ofhissentence. `  Atthetimeofthepetitionersconviction,theapplicablestatuteoflimitationsforfilingapostconvictionpetitionwasthreeyearsofthedateofthefinalaction.T.C.A. ;T6< 4030102(1990Repl.)(repealed1995).Thereafter,ourLegislaturereducedthetimeforfilingapostconvictionpetitiontooneyearfromthefinalaction,andthestatuteoflimitationswas nottobetolledforanyreason.T.C.A.4030202(a)(1996Supp.)(amended1996).Thestatuteoflimitationscouldonlybetolledifoneofthethreeenumeratedexceptionsinthestatuteapplied.SeeT.C.A.4030202(b)(1996Supp.)  0 (amended1996).Inthepresentcase,thepostconvictionpetitionwasfiledoutsidethestatuteoflimitations,andthetrialcourtproperlyheldthatthepetitioner|has|failedtoshowthatoneofthe}enumerated}exceptions~listedinthestatutewasapplicable~applied. `  Finally,astothepetitionersissueregardingtheindictment,hecorrectlyconcedesthatthisissuewasforeclosedbyourSupremeCourtsdecisioninStatev.Hill,  954S.W.2d725.Therefore,thetrialcourtcorrectlydeniedthepetitionforpostconvictionreliefonthisissue. `  ITIS,THEREFORE,ORDEREDthatthestatesmotiontoaffirmthejudgmentofthetrialcourtunderRule20,TennesseeCourtofCriminalAppealsRules,isgranted,andthejudgmentofthetrialcourtisaffirmed.Itappearingthatthepetitionerisindigent,costsoftheseproceedingsaretaxedtothestate. `     h    D  p _____________________________ `     h    D  p THOMAST.WOODALL,JUDGECONCUR:_____________________________ -n(- DAVIDH.WELLES,JUDGE_____________________________JERRYL.SMITH,JUDGE