ÿWPCH) …# VU:a %› 0¡w@¥ 4å ù 0H 0DP 0J” 0TÞ 0^2 0hø 0r 0|r 0†î 0t 1u 0dyU *ÝB) B0DCM AMÆÝÉ£ol D3Û.Ö< 0@ v~R vÓÐ! AO£'Æò' 0D¸( D/ü( B+)˜HP LaserJet 4SiHPPCL5MS,ü,,,,,ü0nLhÎ, øð AZ‹"Arial RegularX(Üg$¡¡Ñ°ÑÑ€°ÑÒ€°ÒÒX°ÒÑTR[¤ AØ'ÿ Legal3Ø' AØ'ÿ Legalÿ3Ø'TÑÑ7€YXXdðXXdð7ÑÑ  ÑÑ  Ñ 9D:D;<D=>e?@DAÓ€MR¦"3|xO(ø(3G‚$¤¤Ý ƒg!ÝѰÑÑ€°ÑÒ€°ÒÒX°ÒÑTR[  AØ'ÿ Legal3Ø' AØ'ÿ Legalÿ3Ø'TÑÑ7€OžXXdædæ7ÑÑ  ÑÑ  ÑÝ  Ýà Ø àòòÚ  Ú0Ú  Úóó(#Ã$òòÚ  Ú0Ú  Úóó2 ÿÿ0Indent1Ô2ÔÔ3  Ô2" ÿÿ0Indent2à0 àÔ2ÔÔ3  Ô2, ÿÿ0Indent3à0 àà0 àÔ2ÔÔ3  Ô26 ÿÿ0Indent4à0 àà0 àà0 àÔ2ÔÔ3  Ô2@ ÿÿ0Indent5à0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àÔ2ÔÔ3  Ô2J ÿÿ0Indent6à0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àÔ2ÔÔ3  Ô2T ÿÿ0Indent7à0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àÔ2ÔÔ3  Ô2^ ÿÿ0Indent8à0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àÔ2ÔÔ3  Ô  ÿÿ?AGMSYaioIndent0I.A.1.a.(1)(a)i)a)P ÿÿ8Mac DefaultMac DefaultÓ ` °šXÓ< Œ 9p`(Arial% Line 7 d d####7Border 1dd€-%Cþÿ << Gÿÿ ¼Ý ƒ!ÝÑ  ÑÑ#€d#ÑÔ€"ÔÑ  ÑÑ € ÑÒ € ÒÒ X ÒÑ\R AØ'\ÑÑ#€d#ÑÑ  ÑÑ  ÑÝ  ÝÔ€"ÔÓ  ÓÔ YYY ÔFILEDÔ€"XÔÌÌò òMayÏ19,Ï1997ÌÌCecilÏCrowson,ÏJr.ÌÔ€"ôÔAppellateÏCourtÏClerkó ó ¿Ý ƒ!ÝÑ#€d#ÑÔ€"ÔÑ  ÑÑ € ÑÒ € ÒÒ X ÒÑ\R AØ'\ÑÑ#€d#ÑÑ  ÑÑ  ÑÝ  ÝÝ ƒ $Ýà àòòÚ  ÚÚ  ÚóóÝ  ÝÔ€"ôÔThis€is€appellantððs€name€as€spelled€in€the€indictment.€€€It€is€very€likely€that€this€is€a€clerical€errorÏbecause€the€remainder€of€the€court€documents,€as€well€as€the€briefs€of€the€parties,€name€the€appellantÏð ðTevika€Teague.ðð€€However,€it€is€the€policy€of€this€Court€to€maintain€the€appellantððs€name€as€stated€in€theÏindictment.Ì eÝ ƒ!ÝÑ#€d#ÑÔ€"ÔÑ  ÑÑ € ÑÒ € ÒÒ X ÒÑ\R AØ'\ÑÑ#€d#ÑÑ  ÑÑ  ÑÝ  ÝÝ ƒ $Ýà àòòÚ  ÚÚ  ÚóóÝ  ÝÔ€"ôÔAlthough€the€transcript€from€this€revocation€hearing€is€not€included€in€the€record,€the€aboveÏinformation€is€taken€from€the€arrest€warrant,€its€supporting€documents,€and€the€trial€courtððs€revocationÏorder€which€are€a€part€of€the€technical€record.Ì$$$$'ÿÿdxd $Ý ƒ!ÝÑ#€d#ÑÔ€"ÔÑ  ÑÑ € ÑÒ € ÒÒ X ÒÑ\R AØ'\ÑÑ#€d#ÑÑ  ÑÑ  ÑÝ  ÝÝ ƒ $Ýà àòòÚ  ÚÚ  ÚóóÝ  ÝÔ€"ôÔWhen€reviewing€only€the€propriety€of€the€trial€courtððs€revocation,€the€appropriate€standard€ofÏreview€is€abuse€of€discretion.€€òòState€v.€Harkinóó,€811€S.W.2d€79,€82€(Tenn.€1991).Ì ÌÝ ƒ!ÝÑ#€d#ÑÔ€"ÔÑ  ÑÑ € ÑÒ € ÒÒ X ÒÑ\R AØ'\ÑÑ#€d#ÑÑ  ÑÑ  ÑÝ  ÝÝ ƒ $Ýà àòòÚ  ÚÚ  ÚóóÝ  ÝÔ€"ôÔWe€note€that€the€comprehensive€nature€of€the€record€before€us€distinguishes€appellantððs€caseÏfrom€the€many€in€which€remand€is€required€due€to€an€inadequate€record.€€òòSeeóó€òòe.g.óó€òòState€v.€Bruce€Coleóó,ÏNo.€02C01„9510„CC„00290€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.€at€Jackson,€December€10,€1996);€òòState€v.€Kenneth€W.ÏErvinóó,€No.€03C01„9510„CC„00325€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.€at€Knoxville,€October€30,€1996);€òòState€v.€DannyÏWalkeróó,€No.€02C01„9508„CC„00225€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.€at€Jackson,€September€30,€1996);€òòState€v.€KeithÏF.€Battsóó,€No.€01C01„9210„CR„00326€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.€at€Nashville,€February€18,€1993).Ì("ÿÿ$££Ò  ÒÒ  ÒPtPtHHÚ(ÿáÿâùFG(üHHÚ(d'hStyl{WP}01•ÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃà Ãà Ãà Ãà Ãà ÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÐ ÐÐHHÐÐ  ÐÐ2ÐÐÿÿ¸æ$ÿÐÐHHÐÐÐÐÐÐÐÐ  ÐÐ ÐÐ ÐÑÑÑGenevaÑÑ ÑÑ € ÑÑ<Px–ÈÑÒÒÒ443!#4ÒÒ$ *$ÒÒ$*$ÒÒ ÿKK ÒÒ  Geneva ÒÒ  Geneva ÒÓ.,ÓÓÓÓ6ÓÓ ÓßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßÑGenevaÑÑ ÑÒ  h HD: Geneva ÒÒ  h HD: Geneva Ò€-‚ƒCþÿ<< CÿÿƒLevel 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5($$””ò òÚ  Ú1Ú  Úó ó„„'÷ÿ dxdüÿP PdÝ ƒ!ÝÔ . ÔÔ€"ÔÑ  ÑÑ € ÑÒ € ÒÒ X ÒÑ\R AØ'\ÑÑ#€Xd#ÑÑ#€Xd#ÑÑ  ÑÑ  ÑÝ  Ý›Þ ÞÌà@ àòòIN€THE€COURT€OF€CRIMINAL€APPEALS€OF€TENNESSEE̜ـ€ÙóóßR€&'%A1-j|` , `€€@ÿRß›Ìà@ àòòAT€KNOXVILLE€óóÌÌà@ à€€JANUARY€1997€SESSIONÌÌÌÌÌÌSTATE€OF€TENNESSEE,à àà àà à)à àNo.€03C01„9601„CC„00027€Ìà àà àà àà àà àà à)Ìà àAppelleeà àà àà àà à)à à€Ìà àà àà àà àà àà à)à àBLOUNT€COUNTYÌV.à àà àà àà àà àà à)Ìà àà àà àà àà àà à)à àHON.€D.€KELLY€THOMAS,ÌTWIKA€TEAGUE,à àà àà àà à)à àJUDGEÌà àà àà àà àà àà à)Ìà àAppellant.à àà àà àà à)à à(Sentencing)Ìà àà àà àà àà àà à)Ìà àà àà àà àà àà à)ÌÌÌÌòòFor€the€Appellant:óóà àà àà àà àà àòòFor€the€Appellee:óóÌÌMack€Garnerà àà àà àà àà àJohn€Knox€WalkupÌDistrict€Public€Defenderà àà àà àà àAttorney€General€and€ReporterÌ419€High€Streetà àà àà àà àà àà àà àÌMaryville,€TN€37801à àà àà àà àKaren€M.€Yacuzzoà àà àà àÌà àà àà àà àà àà àà àAssistant€Attorney€GeneralÌà àà àà àà àà àà àà à450€James€Robertson€ParkwayÌà àà àà àà àà àà àà àNashville,€TN€37243„0493ÌÌÌà àà àà àà àà àà àà àMichael€L.€FlynnÌà àà àà àà àà àà àà àDistrict€Attorney€GeneralÌÌà àà àà àà àà àà àà àEdward€P.€Bailey,€Jr.Ìà àà àà àà àà àà àà àAssistant€District€AttorneyÌà àà àà àà àà àà àà à363€Court€StreetÌà àà àà àà àà àà àà àMaryville,€TN€37804ÌÌÌÌOPINION€FILED:€___________________ÌÌÌAFFIRMEDÌÌÌWilliam€M.€Barker,€JudgeÇà@ àò òOPINIONó óÌÌÌÓÓà àThe€appellant,€Twika€Teague,× ƒ( ××  ×€appeals€as€of€right€the€sentence€imposed€byÏthe€Blount€County€Circuit€Court€after€the€revocation€of€her€placement€in€communityÏcorrections.€€Appellant€was€serving€a€four€year€sentence€for€the€offense€of€robbery,€aÏClass€C€felony.€€After€revoking€her€community€corrections€sentence,€the€trial€courtÏincreased€her€sentence€to€five€years€and€ordered€that€it€be€served€in€the€DepartmentÏof€Correction.€€Appellant€contends€that€the€trial€court€erred€in€enhancing€her€originalÏsentence.€€We€affirm€the€increased€sentence.€€Ìà àAppellant€was€indicted€in€October€of€1992€on€two€counts€of€robbery.€€PursuantÏto€a€plea€agreement,€she€pled€guilty€to€one€count€of€robbery€in€July€of€1993.€€At€herÏoriginal€sentencing€hearing,€the€trial€court€ordered€that€appellant€serve€four€years€inÏthe€Department€of€Correction,€but€placed€appellant€on€immediate€probation.€€TheÏorder€of€probation€required,€among€other€things,€that€appellant€enter€counseling€forÏemotional€problems€she€was€experiencing,€obtain€regular€employment,€reportÏregularly€to€her€probation€officer,€report€any€change€of€address€to€her€probationÏofficer,€and€make€payments€to€satisfy€court€costs€and€restitution.€€On€April€12,€1994,€aÏwarrant€for€violation€of€appellantððs€probation€was€issued,€primarily€based€uponÍinformation€that€appellant€had€been€convicted€of€child€abuse€or€neglect€in€CarrollÏCounty.€€The€warrant€also€detailed€other€violations€of€all€the€above€conditions.€ÏFollowing€a€hearing,€the€trial€court€revoked€appellantððs€probation€and€directed€herÏplacement€in€community€corrections€for€the€remainder€of€her€sentence.× ƒ) ××  ×€€Ìà àAppellant€again€failed€to€comply€with€the€conditions€of€her€release€and€onÏMarch€9,€1995,€a€warrant€for€violation€of€community€corrections€was€issued.€€It€wasÏpremised€upon€appellantððs€violation€of€house€arrest,€performance€of€only€32€of€200Ïrequired€community€service€hours,€failure€to€make€payment€on€costs€and€restitution,Ïfailure€to€attend€GED€classes,€failure€to€obtain€consent€before€moving€to€anotherÏresidence,€failure€to€pay€supervision€fees,€failure€to€report€to€her€communityÏcorrections€officer,€and€failure€to€carry€out€all€orders€and€directions€given€by€theÏcommunity€corrections€officer.€€A€revocation€hearing€was€held€in€the€trial€court€onÏAugust€29,€1995.€€Ìà àAppellantððs€community€corrections€supervisor,€Patricia€Ridings,€testified€at€theÏhearing.€€Ridings€stated€that€appellantððs€problems€began€in€December€of€1994€whenÏshe€started€missing€her€group€sessions.€€In€addition,€appellant€changed€herÏresidence€without€gaining€permission€from€Ridings.€€As€a€result,€Ridings€placed€herÏon€house€arrest.€€Appellant€missed€three€curfew€checks€in€the€first€week€and€alsoÍreported€employment€which€was€false€upon€verification.€€After€much€effort,€RidingsÏmet€with€appellant€once€in€January€and€once€in€February.€€She€directed€thatÏappellant€abide€by€the€terms€of€her€community€corrections€and€also€advisedÏappellant€to€enter€a€halfway€house.€€After€seeing€appellant€in€February,€Ridings€wasÏunable€to€locate€her€again.€€She€obtained€a€warrant€for€violation€of€communityÏcorrections€on€March€9,€1995.€€At€some€point€after€issuance€of€the€warrant,€appellantÏcontacted€Ridings€by€telephone€and€indicated€that€she€needed€treatment€for€cocaine.€ÏRidings€informed€appellant€that€there€was€an€outstanding€warrant€and€that€sheÏneeded€to€turn€herself€in€to€authorities.€€Appellant€failed€to€do€so€and€Ridings€had€noÏfurther€contact€with€her.€€She€was€not€taken€into€custody€until€August€7,€1995.€€Ìà àAppellant€also€testified€and€admitted€violating€the€conditions€of€her€sentence.€ÏShe€stated€that€Ridingsðð€testimony€about€her€violations€was€accurate,€except€that€sheÏdid€report€when€she€moved.€€Appellant€testified€that€she€started€using€cocaine€onÏOctober€23,€1994€to€celebrate€her€twenty„first€birthday.€€She€explained€that€her€habitÏwas€ð ðreal,€real€bad.ðð€€At€the€time€of€the€hearing,€she€claimed€that€she€had€not€usedÏcocaine€in€four€months,€but€declared€her€willingness€to€enter€an€inpatient€drugÏtreatment€program.€€In€addition,€appellant€expressed€a€desire€to€be€put€into€aÏprogram€with€constant€supervision€because€ð ðI€canððt€say€that€I€really€learned€myÏlesson.€.€.ðð€€She€also€admitted€having€a€long€history€in€the€juvenile€courts.€€Ìà àThe€trial€court€determined€that€appellant€had€never€followed€the€rules€of€the€Ïcommunity€corrections€program€or€the€laws€of€the€State.€€It€found€that€the€violationsÏoutlined€in€the€warrant€were€supported€by€the€testimony.€€The€court€also€noted€thatÏappellant€acquired€a€drug€habit€while€on€community€corrections.€€Based€upon€thoseÏfindings,€the€trial€court€revoked€appellantððs€community€corrections€sentence€andÏincreased€her€sentence€from€four€years€to€five€years€to€be€served€in€the€DepartmentÏof€Correction.Ìà àThe€Community€Corrections€Act€of€1985€permits€a€trial€court€to€retainÏjurisdiction€over€an€offender€who€is€placed€in€the€program€and€to€revoke€theÏsentence€imposed€at€any€time€based€upon€the€offenderððs€conduct.€€Tenn.€Code€Ann.Ïðð40„36„106(e)(4)€(Supp.€1996).€€Considering€the€appellantððs€admitted€violations€andÏoverwhelming€proof€at€the€hearing,€the€trial€court€was€justified€in€revoking€appellantððsÏplacement€in€community€corrections.€€Appellant€does€not€contest€that€ruling.Ìà àHowever,€appellant€does€challenge€the€trial€courtððs€enhancement€of€herÏsentence€from€four€years€to€five€years.€€After€revoking€a€community€correctionsÏsentence,€the€trial€court€has€statutory€authority€to€resentence€the€defendant€for€anyÏperiod€of€time€up€to€the€maximum€sentence€provided€for€the€offense€committed.€€òòId.óó€ÏòòSeeóó€òòalsoóó€òòState€v.€Griffithóó,€787€S.W.2d€340,€341„42€(Tenn.€1990).€€Although€anÏincrease€is€permitted,€the€new€sentence€may€not€exceed€the€range€of€the€originalÏsentence.€€òòState€v.€Pattyóó,€922€S.W.2d€102,€103€(Tenn.€1995).€Ìà àWhen€a€trial€court€resentences€an€offender€after€revocation€of€communityÏcorrections,€the€sentencing€must€be€in€accordance€with€the€principles€and€guidelinesÏof€the€Sentencing€Act.€€òòSeeóó€òòState€v.€Michael€Aldersonóó,€No.€01C01„9404„CC„00120Ï(Tenn.€Crim.€App.€at€Nashville,€October€17,€1996),€òòperm.óó€òòtoóó€òòappealóó€òòdeniedóó€(Tenn.Ï1997).€€òòSeeóó€òòalsoóó€òòPattyóó,€922€S.W.2d€at€103€(applying€the€1989€Sentencing€Act€toÏreview€of€an€increased€sentence€after€revocation€of€community€corrections).€€As€withÏour€review€of€other€sentencing€decisions,€we€conduct€a€de€novo€review,× ƒ+ ××  ×€which€isÏaccompanied€by€a€presumption€of€correctness€only€when€the€trial€court€consideredÏthe€sentencing€principles€and€all€relevant€facts€and€circumstances.€€Tenn.€Code€Ann.Ïðð40„35„401(d)€(1990);€òòState€v.€Ashbyóó,€823€S.W.2d€166,€169€(Tenn.€1991).€€InÏgeneral,€the€Act€requires€the€trial€court€to€place€on€the€record€the€reasons€for€the€finalÏsentencing€decision,€to€identify€the€enhancing€and€mitigating€factors€applicable€andÏthe€facts€supporting€application€of€these€factors,€and€to€explain€how€the€factors€wereÏbalanced€in€determining€the€sentence.€€òòState€v.€Jonesóó,€883€S.W.2d€597,€599€(Tenn.Ï1994).€€òòSeeóó€òòalsoóó€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð40„35„210€(Supp.€1996).€€When€a€trial€court€failsÏto€follow€the€foregoing€procedure,€the€presumption€of€correctness€fails.€€òòJonesóó,€883ÏS.W.2d€at€600.€€òòSeeóó€òòalsoóó€òòState€v.€Sheltonóó,€854€S.W.2d€116,€123€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.Ï1992).€€€Ìà àIn€appellantððs€case,€the€trial€court€did€not€explicitly€delineate€the€applicableÏenhancement€factors€for€the€increased€sentence€and€the€presumption€of€correctnessÏmust€fail.€€Nevertheless,€upon€our€de€novo€review€of€the€record,€we€find€that€aÏsentence€of€five€years€was€justified€under€the€Sentencing€Act.€€Ìà àThe€trial€court€enhanced€appellantððs€sentence€by€one€year.€€AppellantððsÏoffense,€robbery,€is€a€Class€C€felony€which€has€a€Range€I€sentence€of€three€to€sixÏyears.€€Therefore,€a€five€year€sentence€does€not€exceed€the€range.€€òòSeeóó€òòState€v.ÏPattyóó,€922€S.W.2d€102,€103€(Tenn.€1995).€€Moreover,€we€believe€it€is€justified€by€theÏapplication€of€two€enhancement€factors.€€Appellantððs€actions€reflect€a€previousÏunwillingness€to€comply€with€the€conditions€of€a€sentence€involving€release€into€theÏcommunity€and€also€that€she€continued€engaging€in€criminal€behavior.€€Tenn.€CodeÏAnn.€ðð40„35„114(8),€(1)€(Supp.€1996).Ìà àWithin€six€months€of€being€placed€on€probation,€appellant€violated€the€law,Ïwas€convicted€of€child€abuse/neglect€and€was€serving€90€days€in€jail.€€Not€only€wasÏher€commission€of€this€offense€violative€of€her€probation,€her€failure€to€report€it€to€herÏprobation€officer€was€also€a€violation.€€Appellant€had€committed€numerous€otherÏinfractions,€including€her€move€to€another€part€of€the€State€without€permission.€€AfterÏbeing€placed€in€community€corrections,€she€again€took€advantage€of€the€largesse€ofÏthe€court.€€Only€five€months€after€that€placement,€appellant€violated€ð ðvirtually€everyÏrule€of€her€Community€Corrections€Program€agreement,€including€absconding.ðð€€AfterÍbeing€informed€of€the€outstanding€warrant,€appellant€refused€to€turn€herself€in€toÏauthorities.€€Appellant€has€shown€little€respect€for€the€leniency€of€the€trial€court,Ïdemonstrated€by€repeatedly€failing€to€comply€with€the€conditions€of€the€alternativeÏsentences€granted€by€the€trial€court.€€Clearly,€she€has€demonstrated€an€unwillingnessÏto€comply€with€the€conditions€of€a€sentence€involving€her€release€into€the€community.€Ìà àHer€use€of€cocaine€and€conviction€for€child€abuse/neglect€exhibit€criminalÏbehavior€and€also€must€be€considered€in€enhancing€her€sentence.€€òòSeeóó€Tenn.€CodeÏAnn.€ðð40„35„114(1)€(Supp.€1996);€òòState€v.€Michael€Aldersonóó,€No.€01C01„9404„CC„00120€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.€at€Nashville,€October€17,€1996),€òòperm.óó€òòtoóó€òòappealóó€òòdeniedóóÏ(Tenn.€1997).€€œAppellant›€contends€that€no€change€in€circumstances€affecting€theÏenhancement€factors€has€occurred€since€her€original€sentencing.€€Unfortunately,€weÏcannot€so€easily€overlook€appellantððs€subsequent€conviction€for€child€abuse/neglect,Ïher€sustained€cocaine€addiction,€and€her€unwillingness€to€abide€by€the€terms€andÏconditions€of€her€sentence.€€Ìà àIncluded€in€the€record€before€us€was€the€entire€history€of€this€robbery€chargeÏagainst€appellant,€from€the€indictment€to€the€last€order€of€enhanced€sentence.€€TheÏrecord€contained€the€presentence€report,€the€copies€of€arrest€warrants€andÏsupporting€affidavits€from€probation€and€community€correction€officers,€as€well€as€theÏtranscript€from€the€last€revocation€hearing.€€The€extensive€information€available€in€theÍrecord€facilitated€our€de€novo€review.€€The€appellantððs€increased€sentence€is€proper.× ƒ, ××  ×€ÏThe€sentence€is€affirmed.à àÌÓÓà àà àà àà àà àà àà à_______________________________Ìà àà àà àà àà àà àà àWilliam€M.€Barker,€JudgeÌÌÌÌ____________________________ÌJoseph€M.€Tipton,€JudgeÌÌÌÌ____________________________ÌCurwood€Witt,€Judge€€€€€