ÿWPC  …# V %a 0(gbw@—4×ëú 1m 0co bÒ UNÚ 0J( 0Tr 0^Æ 0h$ 0rŒ 0|þ 0†z 0 1u 0dU>iU *§ BÑB)îDC AMZ§ D3½v~ðvÓn 0@A 0w 0Šø 0 ‚ 0´" 0ÇÖ 0Û 0ïx AOgƶ 0D| D/À Bï˜HP LaserJet 4SiHPPCL5MSÈðððÈð0X($¡¡- ù- êëìíîîïðDñDòóÓ€Úƒç"3|xþ tuvwxyz#,37=CIQYag­­1.a.i.(1)(a)(i)1)a)(;s˜$´´Ô2,ÔÚ  Ú0Ú  Ú.Ô3  Ôà0  à- ù-(ÈhH  Z 6Times New Roman Regular2 ÿÿ0Indent1Ô2ÔÔ3  Ô2" ÿÿ0Indent2à0 àÔ2ÔÔ3  Ô2, ÿÿ0Indent3à0 àà0 àÔ2ÔÔ3  Ô26 ÿÿ0Indent4à0 àà0 àà0 àÔ2ÔÔ3  Ô2@ ÿÿ0Indent5à0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àÔ2ÔÔ3  Ô2J ÿÿ0Indent6à0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àÔ2ÔÔ3  Ô2T ÿÿ0Indent7à0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àÔ2ÔÔ3  Ô2^ ÿÿ0Indent8à0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àÔ2ÔÔ3  Ô ÿÿ?AGMSYaioIndent0I.A.1.a.(1)(a)i)a)P ÿÿ8Mac DefaultMac DefaultÓ ` °šXÓ< Œ 9p`(&Times New Roman< Œ 9p`(Arial d% Line 7 d&&&&7Border 1dd€-'Cþÿ << Gÿÿ Ý ƒ!ÝÑ  ÑÑ#€d#ÑÔ€#ÔÝ  ÝÔ€$ÔÔ€$ÔÓ  ÓÔ YYY ÔFILEDÔ€$XÔÌÌò òJuly€9,€1997ÌÌCecil€Crowson,€Jr.ÌÔ€$ôÔAppellate€Court€Clerkó ó%%%%'ÿÿdxdPtPtHHÚ(ÿáÿâùFG(üHHÚ(d'hStyl{WP}01•ÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃà Ãà Ãà Ãà Ãà ÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÐ ÐÐHHÐÐ  ÐÐ2ÐÐÿÿ¸æ$ÿÐÐHHÐÐÐÐÐÐÐÐ  ÐÐ ÐÐ ÐÑÑÑGenevaÑÑ ÑÑ € ÑÑ<Px–ÈÑÒÒÒ443!#4ÒÒ$ *$ÒÒ$*$ÒÒ ÿKK ÒÒ  Geneva ÒÒ  Geneva ÒÓ.,ÓÓÓÓ6ÓÓ ÓßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßÑGenevaÑÑ ÑÒ  h HD: Geneva ÒÒ  h HD: Geneva Ò("ÿÿ$££Ò  ÒÒ  Ò(OÞ{$µµà0  àÔ2,ÔÚ  ÚaÚ  Ú.Ô3  Ôà0` (#(#à(b²D$¶¶à0  àà0` (#(#àÔ2,ÔÚ  ÚÚ  Ú.Ô3  Ôà0¸ ` (#` (#à(xÓñ$··à0  àà0` (#(#àà0¸ ` (#` (#àÔ2,Ô(Ú  Ú0Ú  Ú)Ô3  Ôà0¸ (#¸ (#à(ŒÆ‚$¸¸à0  àà0` (#(#àà0¸ ` (#` (#àà0¸ (#¸ (#àÔ2,Ô(Ú  ÚaÚ  Ú)Ô3  Ôà0h(#(#à(Ÿù…$¹¹à0  àà0` (#(#àà0¸ ` (#` (#àà0¸ (#¸ (#àà0h(#(#àÔ2,Ô(Ú  ÚÚ  Ú)Ô3  Ôà0Àh(#h(#à(³¶4$ººà0  àà0` (#(#àà0¸ ` (#` (#àà0¸ (#¸ (#àà0h(#(#àà0Àh(#h(#àÔ2,ÔÚ  Ú0Ú  Ú)Ô3  Ôà0À(#À(#à(Ǫ»$»»à0  àà0` (#(#àà0¸ ` (#` (#àà0¸ (#¸ (#àà0h(#(#àà0Àh(#h(#àà0À(#À(#àÔ2,ÔÚ  ÚaÚ  Ú)Ô3  Ôà0p(#(#à€-‚ƒCþÿ<< CÿÿƒLevel 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5($$””ò òÚ  Ú1Ú  Úó ó„„'÷ÿ dxdüÿP PdÝ ƒ!ÝÔ . ÔÔ€#ÔÝ  Ý›Ñ ` ÑÒ  ÒÒ ° ÒÒ  ÒÒ „ ÒÑ\R AØ'\ÑÔ€#ŠÔÔ€$ÔÑ\R AØ'\ÑÑ€ÑÑ7€à¦XXdðdÈ7ÑÑ  ÑÑ  ÑÓ  Óò òÞ ÞÌIN€THE€COURT€OF€CRIMINAL€APPEALS€OF€TENNESSEE̜ـ€ÙßR€()'A1-j|` Å `€€@ÿRß›ÌAT€KNOXVILLEÌÌFEBRUARY€SESSION,€1997ÌÌÌÌÌÓ  ÓSTATE€OF€TENNESSEE,€à àà à)€€€€€€€C.C.A.€NO.€03C01„9604„CC„00151Ìà àà àà àà àà àà à)à àó óÌà àà àAppellee,à àà àò òà à)€€€€€€€COCKE€COUNTYÌà àà àà àà àà àà à)€€€€€€€Ìà àà àà àà àà àà à)à àÌV.à àà àà àà àà àà à)€€€€€€€HON.€BEN€W.€HOOPER,€II,Ìà àà àà àà àà àà à)€€€€€€€JUDGEó óÌò òCLINTON€DARRELL€TURNER,à à)à àó óÌà àà àà àà àà àò òà à)€€€€€€€(DUI;€DRIVING€WHILE€à àó óÌà àà àAppellant.à àà àò òà à)€€€€€€€LICENSE€SUSPENDED)Ìó óÌÌÌÓ  ÓÌòòÓ  ÓFOR€THE€APPELLANTóó:à àà àà àòòFOR€THE€APPELLEEóó:ÌÌò òEDWARD€CANTRELL€MILLERà àJOHN€KNOX€WALKUP€Ìó óDistrict€Public€Defenderà àà àà àAttorney€General€&€ReporterÌÌò òSUSANNA€LAWS€THOMASà àà àELIZABETH€T.€RYANÌó óAssistant€Public€Defenderà àà àAssistant€Attorney€GeneralÌ102€Mims€Avenueà àà àà àà à450€James€Robertson€ParkwayÌNewport,€TN€37821„3614à àà àNashville,€TN€€37243„0493ÌÌà àà àà àà àà àà àò òALFRED€C.€SCHMUTZER,€JR.Ìà àà àà àà àà àà àó óDistrict€Attorney€GeneralÌÌà àà àà àà àà àà àò òJAMES€BRUCE€DUNN€ó óÌà àà àà àà àà àà àAssistant€District€Attorney€GeneralÌà àà àà àà àà àà à339A€East€Main€StreetÌà àà àà àà àà àà àNewport,€TN€€37821ÌÌÌÌÌOPINION€FILED€________________________ÌÌAFFIRMEDÌÌTHOMAS€T.€WOODALL,€JUDGEÇò òòòÓ  ÓÔ€$°ÔOPINIONóóó óÔ€$ŠÔÌÌÌÌÓÓÓ  Óà àThe€Defendant,€Clinton€Darrell€Turner,€appeals€as€of€right€his€convictionÏand€sentence€for€DUI.€€Following€a€jury€trial,€the€Defendant€was€convicted€ofÏdriving€a€motor€vehicle€while€under€the€influence€of€€an€intoxicant€and€driving€onÏa€revoked€license€in€the€Cocke€County€œCircuit›€Court.€€The€trial€court€sentencedÏthe€Defendant€to€eleven€(11)€months€and€twenty„nine€(29)€days€on€the€chargeÏof€driving€while€under€the€influence€and€six€months€for€the€charge€of€driving€on€aÏrevoked€license.€€The€sentences€were€ordered€to€be€served€concurrently.€€TheÏtrial€court€suspended€the€entire€sentence€for€the€conviction€of€driving€on€aÏrevoked€license.€€On€the€DUI,€the€Defendant€was€ordered€to€serve€seven€daysÏin€jail€with€the€balance€to€be€served€on€probation.€€In€addition€to€challenging€theÏsufficiency€of€the€evidence,€Defendant€also€argues€the€trial€court€erred€byÏallowing€an€officer€to€testify€as€to€field€sobriety€tests€when€the€officer€was€notÏtrained€to€administer€those€tests.€€The€last€issue€the€Defendant€raises€is€that€theÏtrial€court€erred€by€sentencing€him€to€serve€seven€days€rather€than€the€two€(2)Ïday€minimum€provided€by€law.€€We€affirm€the€judgment€of€the€trial€court.ÌÌà@ àSUFFICIENCY€OF€THE€EVIDENCEÌÌà àDefendant€first€challenges€the€sufficiency€of€the€evidence.€€When€anÏaccused€challenges€the€sufficiency€of€the€convicting€evidence,€the€standard€isÏwhether,€after€reviewing€the€evidence€in€the€light€most€favorable€to€theÏprosecution,€any€rational€trier€of€fact€could€have€found€the€essential€elements€ofÏthe€crime€beyond€a€reasonable€doubt.€€òòJackson€v.€Virginiaóó,€443€U.S.€307,€319Ï(1979).€€On€appeal,€the€State€is€entitled€to€the€strongest€legitimate€view€of€theÏevidence€and€all€inferences€therefrom.€€òòState€v.€Cabbageóó,€571€S.W.2d€832,€835Ï(Tenn.€1978).€€A€jury€verdict€approved€by€the€trial€judge€accredits€the€StateððsÏwitnesses€and€resolves€all€conflicts€in€favor€of€the€State.€€òòState€v.€Graceóó,€493ÏS.W.2d€474,€476€(Tenn.€1973).ÌÌà àBecause€a€verdict€of€guilt€removes€the€presumption€of€innocence€andÏreplaces€it€with€a€presumption€of€guilt,€the€accused€has€the€burden€in€this€courtÏof€illustrating€why€the€evidence€is€insufficient€to€support€the€verdict€returned€byÏthe€trier€of€fact.€€òòState€v.€Tuggleóó,€639€S.W.2d€913,€914€(Tenn.€1982);€òòGraceóó,€493ÏS.W.2d€at€476.€€Any€questions€concerning€the€credibility€of€the€witnesses,€theÏweight€and€value€to€be€given€the€evidence,€as€well€as€all€factual€issues€raisedÏby€the€evidence,€are€resolved€by€the€trier€of€fact,€not€this€court.€€òòState€v.ÏPappasóó,€754€S.W.2d€620,€623€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.),€òòpermóó.€òòtoóó€òòappealóó€òòdeniedóó,€òòidóó.Ï(Tenn.€1987).€€Nor€may€this€court€reweigh€or€reevaluate€the€evidence.€ÏòòCabbageóó,€571€S.W.2d€at€835.ÌÌà àOfficer€Bennie€Shelton€of€the€Cocke€County€Sheriffððs€Department€was€theÏStateððs€only€witness€at€trial.€€The€Defendant€presented€no€proof.€€Officer€SheltonÏtestified€that€on€July€15,€1994€at€1:30€a.m.,€he€was€on€patrol€and€observed€theÏDefendantððs€car€traveling€down€Asheville€Highway.€€The€Defendantððs€carÏheadlights€were€not€on,€and,€while€the€car€was€not€a€convertible,€it€had€no€top.€ÏAfter€Officer€Shelton€pulled€behind€the€vehicle€with€his€blue€lights€on,€theÏDefendant€pulled€over€to€the€side€of€the€road.€€He€approached€the€driverððs€sideÏand€found€the€Defendant€to€have€bloodshot€eyes.€€When€he€asked€DefendantÏfor€his€license,€Officer€Shelton€noticed€that€his€speech€was€somewhat€slurred€inÏresponse.€€€Defendant€failed€to€produce€his€license.€€Shelton€asked€DefendantÏto€get€out€of€his€car,€and€the€Defendant€then€told€him€he€did€not€have€a€license.€ÏWhen€the€Defendant€exited€his€car,€Shelton€observed€that€he€was€walking€off„balance.€€A€computer€check€indicated€that€Defendantððs€license€had€beenÏrevoked.€€ÌÌà àOfficer€Shelton€administered€three€separate€field€sobriety€tests,€includingÏthe€horizontal€gaze€nystagmus,€recitation€of€ABCððs,€and€the€finger€to€nose€tests.€ÏWhile€the€Defendant€did€follow€his€directions,€he€was€unable€to€completelyÏfollow€the€pen€during€the€horizontal€gaze€nystagmus€test€without€moving€hisÏhead.€€During€his€recitation€of€the€ABCððs,€he€left€out€some€letters€and€his€speechÍwas€notably€slurred.€€€When€the€Defendant€tried€to€€perform€the€finger€to€noseÏtest,€he€was€only€able€to€touch€his€top€lip.€€Defendantððs€performance€on€theseÏtests,€in€addition€to€the€smell€of€alcohol€about€the€Defendant,€his€slurred€speech,Ïbloodshot€eyes,€and€driving€with€no€headlights,€indicated€to€Officer€Shelton€thatÏthe€Defendant€was€impaired€by€an€intoxicant.€€Furthermore,€the€Officer€observedÏan€empty€liquor€bottle€in€the€Defendantððs€car,€and€the€Defendant€stated€that€heÏhad€just€left€a€local€bar,€The€Brown€House,€where€he€drank€some€alcoholicÏbeverages.€€Based€upon€all€these€observations,€Officer€Shelton€determined€thatÏDefendant€was€operating€a€motor€vehicle€while€under€the€influence€ofÏintoxicants€and€arrested€him.€€Defendant€subsequently€refused€to€submit€to€aÏbreath€alcohol€test.ÌÌà àOfficer€Shelton€admitted€on€cross„examination€that€he€was€not€formallyÏtrained€in€the€administration€of€the€horizontal€gaze€nystagmus€test€or€the€finger€toÏnose€test.€€He€had€observed€state€troopers€administer€the€horizontal€gazeÏnystagmus€test.€€He€added€that€he€was€aware€of€what€would€be€ð ðnormalðð€in€aÏperformance€of€the€ð ðrecitation€of€ABCðð€test€and€the€ð ðfinger€to€noseðð€test.€€OfficerÏShelton€also€added€that€he€had€made€many€prior€arrests€for€DUI€in€the€previousÏseven€years€service€as€a€law€enforcement€officer.ÌÌà àDefendant€was€convicted€of€driving€while€under€the€influence€of€anÏintoxicant.€€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€55„10„401(a).€€At€the€time€of€the€offense€thisÏstatute€provided€that,€ð ðIt€is€unlawful€for€any€person€.€.€.€to€drive€.€.€.€anyÏautomobile€.€.€.€on€any€of€the€public€roads€or€highways€of€the€state€ofÏTennessee€.€.€.€while€under€the€influence€of€an€intoxicant€.€.€.ðð€€Tenn.€Code€Ann.Ïðð€55„10„401.€€The€record€in€this€case€demonstrates€that€the€Defendant€wasÏdriving€his€car€on€a€Tennessee€highway€while€under€the€influence€of€anÏintoxicant.€€This€is€shown€by€the€Defendantððs€slurred€speech,€unsteady€gait,Ïbloodshot€eyes,€smell€of€alcohol,€and€driving€without€the€use€of€his€headlights€atÏ1:30€a.m.€on€Asheville€Highway.€€In€addition,€the€Defendantððs€performance€onÏthe€field€sobriety€tests€indicated€his€guilt.€€Defendant€also€admitted€to€the€OfficerÏthat€he€had€been€drinking.€€Based€upon€the€standard€of€review€for€this€Court,Ïthere€was€more€than€sufficient€evidence€for€a€rational€trier€of€fact€to€determineÏthat€Defendant€was€driving€while€under€the€influence€of€alcohol.€€This€Court€hasÏlong€held€that€circumstantial€evidence€alone€is€sufficient€to€establish€the€elementsÏnecessary€to€sustain€a€conviction€for€DUI.€€òòSeeóó,€òòe.g.óó€òòHopson€v.€Stateóó,€201ÏTenn.€337,€299€S.W.2d€11€(1957);€òòFarmer€v.€Stateóó,€208€Tenn.€75,€343€S.W.2dÏ895€(1961);€òòHardin€v.€Stateóó,€210€Tenn.€116,€355€S.W.2d€105€(1962);€òòState€v.ÏGilbertóó,€751€S.W.2d€454,€459€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.€1988).€€While€Defendant€arguesÏthat€the€State€should€be€required€to€prove€its€case€by€more€than€OfficerÏSheltonððs€testimony,€there€is€clearly€no€such€requirement€under€Tennessee€law.€ÍòòState€v.€Vasseróó,€870€S.W.2d€543,€544€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.€1993).€€There€is€noÏmerit€to€this€issue.ÌÌà@ àTESTIMONY€OF€OFFICER€SHELTONÌÌà àDefendant€argues€that€the€trial€court€erred€in€allowing€Officer€Shelton€toÏtestify€regarding€his€opinion€that€the€Defendant€was€impaired.€€At€trial,ÏDefendant€failed€to€timely€object€to€Officer€Sheltonððs€competence€as€a€witnessÏregarding€Defendantððs€impairment€and€his€subsequent€opinion€as€toÏDefendantððs€intoxication.€€The€trial€court€overruled€Defendantððs€later€objection€onÏthat€basis.€€Failure€to€make€a€contemporaneous€objection€œnormally€waives›Ïconsideration€by€this€court€of€the€issue€on€appeal.€€òòSeeóó€T.R.A.P.€36(a);€òòTeagueÏv.€Stateóó,€772€S.W.2d€915,€926€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.€1988),€òòpermóó.€òòtoóó€òòappealóóÏòòdeniedóó,€òòidóó.€(Tenn.€1989);€òòState€v.€Killebrewóó,€760€S.W.2d€228,€235€(Tenn.€Crim.ÏApp.),€òòpermóó.€òòtoóó€òòappealóó€òòdeniedóó,€òòidóó.€(Tenn.€1988).€€Defendant€did€object€duringÏcross„examination,€but€then€failed€to€make€a€motion€to€strike€any€of€theÏtestimony€of€Officer€Shelton.€€Such€failure€by€the€Defendant€constitutes€œwaiver›€ofÏthis€evidentiary€issue.€€òòSeeóó€òòState€v.€Pilkeyóó,€776€S.W.2d€943,€952€(Tenn.€1989)Ïòòcertóó.€òòdeniedóó,€108€L.Ed.€646€(1990).€€In€any€event€we€are€unaware€of€any€caseÏlaw€that€requires€expert€testimony€to€establish€proof€regarding€the€field€sobrietyÍtests€which€are€known€as€the€ð ðfinger€to€noseðð€and€ð ðrecitation€of€œABCððsð𛀜tests.›€€InÏfact,€in€òòState€v.€Gilbertóó,€751€œÇÑ€ ÑÑ7€•XXdìXXdì7ÑÑ  ÑS.W.2d€454,€459€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.€1988)€this€court€held€that€in€general€fieldÏsobriety€tests€are€not€ð ðscientific€testsðð€and€that€the€admissibility€of€the€results€ofÏsuch€tests€are€not€to€be€governed€by€rules€pertaining€to€the€admission€ofÏscientific€evidence.ÌÌà àNotwithstanding€the€failure€of€Defendantððs€counsel€to€object€or€move€toÏstrike€Officer€Sheltonððs€testimony,€any€such€error€by€the€trial€court€was€harmlessÏerror.€€We€agree€that€Officer€Shelton€should€not€have€been€permitted€to€testifyÏregarding€the€horizontal€gaze€nystagmus€(HGN)€test€upon€proper€objectionÏbeing€made.€€€He€testified€that€he€lacked€formal€training€in€the€HGN€test.€We€feelÏthe€horizontal€gaze€nystagmus€test€is€scientific€evidence,€and,€accordingly,€theÏproof€regarding€the€test€should€be€admitted€with€a€sufficient€foundation€laid€byÏexpert€testimony.€€òòSeeóó€òòState€v.€Cora€Murphyóó,€No.€01S01„9602„CC„00035,ÏDavidson€County€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.,€at€Nashville,€filed€October€6,€1995)€òòpermóó.Ïòòtoóó€òòappealóó€òògrantedóó€(Tenn.€1996).€€We€acknowledge€other€panels€of€this€CourtÏdisagree€with€this€conclusion.€€This€issue€is€presently€pending€in€the€TennesseeÏSupreme€Court.€€Regardless,€there€was€more€than€sufficient€evidence€for€aÏrational€trier€of€fact€to€find€the€Defendant€guilty€of€driving€a€motor€vehicle€whileÏunder€the€influence€of€alcohol€even€without€the€testimony€regarding€the€HGNÏtest.€€òòState€v.€Ronnie€Kirkóó,€No.€02C01„9309„CC„00215,€Chester€County€(Tenn.ÏCrim.€App.,€at€Jackson,€filed€October€12,€1994)€(No€Rule€11€application€filed).€ÍAny€error€in€allowing€any€of€that€testimony€was€harmless€beyond€a€reasonableÏdoubt.€€This€issue€is€without€merit.ÌÔ€#ÔÔ€#XÔÌÌà@ à„Ú  ÚÚ  Ú„Ô€$ÔÔ€$ŠÔÌÇ›à@ àSENTENCEÌÌà àDefendant€argues€that€the€trial€court€erred€in€sentencing€him€to€serveÏseven€days€in€prison,€rather€than€the€two„day€mandatory€minimum€sentence.€ÏThe€misdemeanant,€unlike€a€felon,€is€not€entitled€to€the€presumption€of€aÏminimum€sentence.€€òòState€v.€Creasyóó,€885€S.W.2d€829,€832€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.Ï1994).€€Under€Tennessee€Code€Annotated€section€55„10„403,€a€personÏconvicted€of€driving€a€motor€vehicle€while€under€the€influence€of€an€intoxicantÏmust€be€confined€for€not€less€than€forty„eight€(48)€hours€nor€more€than€elevenÏ(11)€months€and€twenty„nine€(29)€days.€€This€statute,€in€effect,€mandates€aÏmaximum€sentence€for€DUI,€with€the€trial€courtððs€only€function€to€determine€whatÏperiod€above€the€minimum€period€of€incarceration€established€by€statute,€if€any,Ïis€to€be€suspended.€€òòState€v.€Kerry€Combsóó,€No.€03C01„9409„CR„00314,ÏGreene€County€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.,€at€Knoxville,€filed€September€9,€1996),€òòpermóó.Ïòòtoóó€òòappealóó€òòdeniedóó€(Tenn.€1997).ÌÌà à€€A€challenge€as€to€the€length,€range€or€manner€of€service€of€a€sentenceÏrequires€this€Court€to€conduct€a€òòde€novoóó€review€with€a€presumption€that€theÏdeterminations€made€by€the€trial€court€are€correct€so€long€as€the€recordÏdemonstrates€that€the€trial€court€properly€considered€relevant€sentencingÏprinciples.€€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€40„35„401(d);€òòState€v.€Ashbyóó,€823€S.W.2d€166Í(Tenn.€1991).€€In€conducting€a€òòde€novoóó€review€this€Court€must€weigh€theÏevidence€received€at€trial€and€sentencing€hearing,€the€pre„sentence€report,Ïstatutory€principles€for€sentencing,€counselððs€arguments€regarding€sentencing€œÇalternatives,›€the€criminal€conduct€and€its€nature,€mitigating€and€enhancing€factors,Ïthe€defendantððs€statement,€and€the€defendantððs€potential€for€rehabilitation€orÏtreatment.€€òòAshbyóó,€823€S.W.2d€at€169.€€The€record€reflects€that€the€trial€judgeÏfailed€to€follow€the€sentencing€principles€of€òòAshbyóó€and,€therefore,€there€is€noÏpresumption€of€correctness.€€However,€upon€review€of€the€record€we€find€noÏreversible€error€in€the€sentencing€of€Defendant.ÌÌà àWhile€no€presentence€report€was€completed,€the€Defendant€asserts€thatÏhe€had€no€prior€criminal€record€and€that€there€were€no€enhancement€factorsÏapplicable€to€his€offense.€€The€record€fails€to€reflect€that€the€trial€judge€found€anyÏenhancement€or€mitigating€factors.€€The€record€does€reflect€that€theÏcircumstances€of€the€offense€were€serious€in€that€the€Defendant€was€drivingÏalong€a€state€highway€without€his€lights€on€at€1:30€a.m.€€In€his€statement€to€theÏtrial€court,€Defendant€admitted€to€having€driven€numerous€times€while€his€licenseÏwas€revoked.€€Such€acts€were€in€knowing€violation€of€the€law.€€In€considerationÏof€the€above,€we€cannot€conclude€that€the€trial€court€erred€in€ordering€a€sentenceÏwhich€was€greater€than€the€minimum€forty„eight€(48)€hours€€mandated€by€theÏstatute.€€òòSeeóó€òòState€v.€œWarner€D.›€Brannonóó,€C.C.A.€03C01„9508„CR„00233,ÏKnox€County€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.€at€Knoxville,€filed€April€3,€1996),€òòpermóó.€òòtoóó€òòappealóóÏòòdeniedóó€(Tenn.€1996).ÌÇÌà àThe€judgment€of€the€trial€court€is€therefore€affirmed.Ìà àà àà àà àà àÌÓ  ÓÌÓÓà àà àà àà àà à____________________________________Ìà àà àà àà àà àTHOMAS€T.€WOODALL,€JudgeÌÌÌÌCONCUR:ÌÌÌÌ___________________________________ÌJOSEPH€M.€TIPTON,€JudgeÌÌÌ___________________________________ÌJERRY€L.€SMITH,€Judge