ÿWPC' …# VUNa %¯ 0Ƶ4{  0 ž 0D¨ ì wô Æ ÆÊ ÆÆVÆâ D3â 0J 0T_ 0^³ 0h 0ry 0|ë 0†g 0í 1u}U,ò B 0d; 0@ŸU,ßU> U6I D+B)ªDCÓ AOU*eÇ A©V 0Kÿ J‰Uv~ÞvÓ\ AO/& 0D~& D/Â& Bñ&˜HP LaserJet 4Si/4SiMX PS 600dpiPSCRIPTÀÌÀääÀÀÌ0 (ÖÃ9 Z ‹6Times New Roman RegularX(žjÆ$¡¡Ñ` ` ÑÑÜÜÑÒ4°ÒÒX°ÒÑTR[  AØ'ÿ Legal[  AØ'ÿ Legal AØ'ÿ Legal AØ'ÿ LegalTÑÓÓ»{s 3|x¦(º(3eB$¤¤Ý ƒjÆ!ÝÑ` °ÑÑܰÑÒ4°ÒÒX°ÒÑTR[  AØ'ÿ Legal3Ø' AØ'ÿ Legalÿ3Ø'TÑÓÓÝ  Ýà Œ àòòÚ  Ú0Ú  Úóó(#Ã$òòÚ  Ú0Ú  ÚóóšÓ€¦Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5‚Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5ƒLevel 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5„Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5…Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5&&&&'ÿÿdxd2 ÿÿ0Indent1Ô2ÔÔ3  Ô2" ÿÿ0Indent2à0 àÔ2ÔÔ3  Ô2, ÿÿ0Indent3à0 àà0 àÔ2ÔÔ3  Ô26 ÿÿ0Indent4à0 àà0 àà0 àÔ2ÔÔ3  Ô2@ ÿÿ0Indent5à0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àÔ2ÔÔ3  Ô2J ÿÿ0Indent6à0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àÔ2ÔÔ3  Ô2T ÿÿ0Indent7à0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àÔ2ÔÔ3  Ô2^ ÿÿ0Indent8à0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àÔ2ÔÔ3  Ô !"# ÿÿ?AGMSYaioIndent0I.A.1.a.(1)(a)i)a)< Œ 9p`(Modern dP ÿÿ8Mac DefaultMac DefaultÓ ` °šXÓ("ÿÿ$££Ò  ÒÒ  Ò< Œ 9p`(Monaco< Œ 9p`(&Times New Roman< Œ 9p`(Courier New'ÈÈÈÈdxd% Line 7 d33337Border 1dd*94Cþÿ << Gÿÿ< Œ 9p`(Arial ½Ý ƒ!ÝÑ  ÑÑ#€d#ÑÔ€%ÔÔ€0ÔÑ ` ÑÑ Ü ÑÒ 4 ÒÒ X ÒÑ\R AØ'\ÑÓÓÝ  ÝÔ€6ÔÔ€6ÔÓ  ÓÔ YYY ÔFILEDÔ€6XÔÌÌò òAprilÏ17,Ï1996ÌÌCecilÏCrowson,ÏJr.ÌÔ€6ôÔAppellateÏCourtÏClerkó ó*92›&OLE 2.0 Box <=8ÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿCÿÿ HKKKK( ±þ$’’ò òFigure€Ú  Ú1Ú  Úó ó Ý ƒ!ÝÑ#€d#ÑÔ€%ÔÔ€0ÔÑ ` ÑÑ Ü ÑÒ 4 ÒÒ X ÒÑ\R AØ'\ÑÓÓÝ  ÝÝ ƒ $Ýà àòòÚ  ÚÚ  ÚóóÝ  ÝÓÓ€Ô€1ÔÔ€1ôÔThis€is€an€apparent€typographical€error€in€the€record;Ï"ineffective"€rather€than€"effective"€actually€appears€in€the€transcribedÏorder.Ì Ý ƒ!ÝÑ#€d#ÑÔ€%ÔÔ€0ÔÑ ` ÑÑ Ü ÑÒ 4 ÒÒ X ÒÑ\R AØ'\ÑÓÓÝ  ÝÝ ƒ $Ýà àòòÚ  ÚÚ  ÚóóÝ  ÝÔ€1ÔÔ€1ôÔÓÓ€The€stateððs€offer€of€ten€years€at€30%€for€the€three€offenses€wouldÏhave€provided€a€release€eligibility€date€of€3€years.€€It€could€haveÏaccomplished€a€3.5„year€result€with€a€Range€II€(35%),€10„year€sentence.€ÏòòSeeóó€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€40„35„101,€et.€seq.ÌPtPtHHÚ(ÿáÿâùFG(üHHÚ(d'@Styl{WP}01•ÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃà Ãà Ãà Ãà Ãà ÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÐ ÐÐHHÐÐ  ÐÐ2ÐÐÿÿ¸æ$ÿÐÐHHÐÐÐÐÐÐÐÐ  ÐÐ ÐÐ ÐÑÑÑGenevaÑÑ ÑÑ € ÑÑ<Px–ÈÑÒÒÒ443!#4ÒÒ$ *$ÒÒ$*$ÒÒ ÿKK ÒÒ  Geneva ÒÒ  Geneva ÒÓ.,ÓÓÓÓ6ÓÓ ÓßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßÑMonacoÑÑ ÑÒ  BA:Op Monaco ÒÒ  BA:Op Monaco Ò*‚ƒCþÿ<< Cÿÿ($$””ò òÚ  Ú1Ú  Úó ó„„'÷ÿ dxdüÿP PdÝ ƒ!ÝÔ . ÔÔ€%ÔÓ&€//X„d&ÓÑ#€//Xd#ÑÔ€0ÔÑ ` ÑÑ Ü ÑÒ 4 ÒÒ X ÒÑ\R AØ'\ÑÓÓÝ  ÝÔ€1ÔÑ7€¶@XdìdÈ7ÑÑ  ÑÙ€ÙßL€574;+'h|` ´- `€€Lß›à@ àòòIN€THE€COURT€OFÏCRIMINAL€APPEALS€OF€TENNESSEEóóÌà@ àòòAT€JACKSONóóÌà@ àDECEMBER€1995€SESSIONÌÌœÌPHILLIP›€R.€WOODS,à àà à*à àC.C.A.€#Ï02C01„9505„CC„00129€Ìà àAppellant,à àà à*à àMADISON€COUNTYÌVS.à àà àà àà àà à*à àHon.€WhitÏLafon,€JudgeÌSTATE€OF€TENNESSEE,à àà à*à à(Post„Conviction)Ìà àAppellee.à àà àà à*ÌÌòòFor€Appellantóóà àà àà àà àòòFor€AppelleeóóÌÓÓJames€D.€Gassà àà àà àà àCharles€W.ÏBursonÌAttorneyà àà àà àà àà àAttorneyÏGeneral€&€ReporterÌ203€South€Shannonà àà àà àÌSuite€100à àà àà àà àà àMichelle€L.ÏLehmannà àÌJackson,€TN€€38301à àà àà àAssistantÏAttorney€GeneralÌà àà àà àà àà àà à450€JamesÏRobertson€ParkwayÌà àà àà àà àà àà àNashville,ÏTN€€37243„0493ÌÌà àà àà àà àà àà àJames€W.€ThompsonÌà àà àà àà àà àà àAsst.€District€Attorney€GeneralÌà àà àà àà àà àà àœ225€Martin€Luther€King,€Jr.€Dr.›Ìà àà àà àà àà àà àJackson,€TN€€38301ÌÌÌÌÌÌÌÌÌOPINION€FILED€òò€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€óóÌÌÌÌÌREVERSED€AND€REMANDEDÌÌÌÌÌGARY€R.€WADE,€JUDGEÇÓÓà@ àòòOPINIONóóÌà àà àThe€petitioner,€Phillip€R.€Woods,€appeals€the€trialÏcourt's€denial€of€post„conviction€relief.€€The€petitionerÏpresents€two€issues€for€our€review:€€(1)€whether€the€petitionerÏwas€denied€the€effective€assistance€of€counsel€due€to€theÏillegality€of€the€sentence;€and€(2)€whether€the€petitionerÏknowingly€and€voluntarily€pled€guilty.ÌÌà àà àWe€find€that€the€trial€court€erred€by€denying€reliefÏand€remand€the€cause€for€further€proceedings.ÌÌà àà àOriginally€charged€with€especially€aggravated€robbery,Ïaggravated€robbery€and€two€counts€of€robbery,€the€petitionerÏentered€into€an€agreement€whereby€he€pled€guilty€to€three€countsÏof€robbery€and€received€concurrent,€Range€I€sentences€of€tenÏyears€for€each€conviction;€the€state€dismissed€the€charge€ofÏespecially€aggravated€robbery.ÌÌà@ àIÌà àà àThe€petitioner€complains€that€his€counsel€wasÏineffective€for,€among€other€things,€having€failed€to€conduct€anÏadequate€investigation€and€"coerc[ing]"€the€defendant€to€agreeÍto€a€sentence€greater€than€the€statutory€range.€€òòSeeóó€Tenn.€CodeÏAnn.€ðð€39„13„401;€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€40„35„112(a)(3).€€TheÏpetitioner€testified€that€he€had€never€been€convicted€of€a€crimeÏprior€to€this€incident.€€He€stated€that€he€entered€his€pleaÏafter€talking€with€counsel€only€because€he€feared€a€possibleÏlife€sentence€if€he€demanded€a€trial€and€was€concerned€about€theÏpossible€effect€of€recent€charges€made€against€him€in€Illinois.€ÏThe€petitioner€contends€that€his€trial€counsel€failed€to€explainÏthe€differences€in€sentencing€ranges€and€had€failed€to€adviseÏhim€that€a€Range€I€robbery€required€a€term€of€between€three€andÏsix€years.€€€òòÌÌà àà àóóTrial€counsel€testified€that€the€petitioner's€previousÏcriminal€record€might€have€called€for€a€higher€sentence€withinÏthe€range€and€included€the€possibility€of€consecutiveÏsentencing.€€He€stated€that€the€petitioner€had€been€advised€ofÏan€offer€for€a€twelve„year,€Range€I€sentence€and€that€theÏpetitioner€had€authorized€a€counter€offer€which€included€aÏdismissal€of€the€especially€aggravated€robbery€and€a€Range€I,Ïten„year€sentence€on€the€other€three€offenses.€€Trial€counselÏasserted€that€he€was€unaware€that€the€petitioner€had€received€aÏten„year€sentence€for€each€conviction,€as€opposed€to€anÍaggregate€ten„year€term,€until€the€filing€of€the€post„convictionÏpetition.€€He€believed€that€the€petitioner€had€received€a€totalÏof€ten€years€at€30%€for€the€three€convictions€even€though€noneÏof€the€sentences€were€to€be€served€consecutively.€€He€testifiedÏthat€he€thought€the€error€could€have€been€corrected€by€amendingÏthe€judgment€form.Ì€€€Ìà àà àThe€assistant€district€attorney€general,€James€W.ÏThompson,€agreed€at€the€post„conviction€hearing€that€theÏoriginal€plea€agreement€was€for€an€aggregate€ten„year€sentenceÏfor€all€three€robberies.€€The€plea€agreement€provided€that€theÏdefendant€receive€a€sentence€of€œ"ten›€years€at€œ30%"›€for€all€threeÏrobbery€offenses€and€that€the€especially€aggravated€robbery€beÏdismissed.€€Thompson€stated€at€the€evidentiary€hearing€that€theÏstateððs€intent€was€œ"to›€give€him€10€years€on€œeverything"›€andÏconceded€that€the€judgment€reflecting€a€ten„year€sentence€forÏeach€conviction€was€œ"outside›€the€range€.€.€.€and€œviolate[d›]€theÏœstatute."›€€He€suggested€that€the€judgment€be€amended€for€twoÏthree„year€sentences€and€one€four„year€sentence,€eachÏconsecutive€to€the€other.ÌÌà àà àAt€the€conclusion€of€the€hearing,€the€trial€courtÍruled€that€the€petitioner€had€not€been€denied€the€effectiveÏassistance€of€counsel€and€complimented€trial€counsel€for€œ"an›Ïexcellent€job€œrepresenting"›€the€petitioner.€€The€court€held€thatÏthe€judgments€which€reflected€concurrent€sentences€of€ten€yearsÏfor€each€robbery€conviction€were€proper€and€any€mistake€wasÏmerely€a€technical€error.€€In€dismissing€the€petition,€the€trialÏcourt€ruled€in€part,€as€follows:ÌÓÓœà8 àà8 à6.›€€The€defendant/Petitioner€entered€a€pleaÏagreement€with€the€State€for€[an]€effectiveœ× ƒ: ××  ×›Ïsentence€of€10€years.ÌÌœà8 àà8 à7.›€€The€judgment€prepared€by€the€StatesððÏattorney€is€so€filled€out€as€to€be€inÏviolation€of€the€sentencing€guidelines.ÌÌœà8 àà8 à8.›€€The€error€in€the€judgment€isÏministerial€and€has€no€bearing€or€effect€onÏthe€validity€of€the€defendant[ðð]s€plea€norÏdoes€it€affect€the€10€year€sentence€toÏwhich€the€defendant/petitioner€agreed€toÏserve.ÌÌà8 àà8 à9.€€Post„Conviction€is€not€the€properÏavenue€to€address€the€issue€of€an€incorrectÏ[judgment].ÌÌà8 àà8 à10.€€Any€errors€in€filling€out€theÏjudgments€are€not€attributed€to€trialÏcounsel€and€cannot€be€cured€by€Post„Conviction€[r]elief.ÓÓÌThe€trial€court€determined€that€trial€counsel€had€not€beenÍineffective€by€suggesting€a€plea€agreement€of€a€sentence€of€tenÏyears€with€a€release€eligibility€date€at€30%€for€three€robberyÏoffenses.€€It€is€implicit€in€the€ruling€that€the€trial€courtÏfound€nothing€illegal€about€the€sentence.€€òòÌóóÌà àà àIn€òòState€v.€Mahleróó,€735€S.W.2d€226€(Tenn.€1987),€ourÏsupreme€court€held€that€a€defendant€who€had€entered€a€knowingÏand€voluntary€plea€of€guilt€to€a€sentence€within€the€statutoryÏrange€could€accept€classification€as€a€Range€II€offender,€evenÏthough€he€did€not€technically€qualify€above€Range€I.€€òòSeeóó€Tenn.ÏCode€Ann.€ðð€40„35„105€through€„109.€€The€sentence€was€affirmedÏon€the€basis€that€the€defendant€could€legitimately€enter€a€pleaÏagreement€within€the€range€of€punishment€provided€by€law,€evenÏif€he€did€not€have€a€sufficient€prior€record€to€warrant€theÏhigher€classification€within€the€range.€€In€òòMahleróó,€however,€theÏsupreme€court€acknowledged€the€difference€between€a€rangeÏclassification€and€a€sentence€which€exceeded€the€statutory€term:€Ï"a€judgment€imposed€by€a€trial€court€in€direct€contravention€ofÏexpress€statutory€provisions€...€is€illegal€and€is€subject€toÏbeing€set€aside€òòat€any€timeóó,€even€if€it€has€become€final."€€735ÏS.W.2d€at€228€(emphasis€added).ÌÌà àà àMore€recently,€this€court€has€set€aside€as€illegalÏplea€agreements€similar€to€that€made€in€this€case.€€òòSeeóó€òòRonaldÏLature€œMcCray€v.€Stateóó,›€No.€02C01„9412„CC„00277€(Tenn.€Crim.ÏApp.,€at€Jackson,€September€27,€1995);€òòGeorge€Cheairs€v.€Stateóó,ÏNo.€02C01„9304„CC„00070€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.,€at€Jackson,€OctoberÏ26,€1994).€€In€òòGeorge€Cheairs€v.€Stateóó,€this€court€made€theÏfollowing€observation:ÌÓÓœ›œà8 à›œà8 à›à àIf€the€parties€can€agree€that€aÏdefendant€be€sentenced€to€a€term€of€yearsÏexceeding€the€maximum€for€his€range,€thenÏlogically€by€agreement€he€could€beÏsentenced€to€a€term€less€than€the€minimum.€ÏThe€release€eligibility€date€would€then€beÏdetermined€by€agreement€rather€than€theÏRange.€€Thus,€the€statutory€ranges€and€theÏcorresponding€release€eligibilityÏpercentages€would€be€virtually€meaningless,Ïwith€sentencing€structure€governed€byÏœcontract€rather€than€by€statute.›ÌÌÓÓslip€op.€at€4€(holding€that€an€issue€of€ineffective€assistanceÏof€counsel€is€rendered€moot€when€a€defendant€receives€an€illegalÏsentence).€€Although€we€cannot€distinguish€òòCheairsóó€and€òòMcCrayóóÏfrom€òòDarnell€Gentry€v.€Stateóó,€No.€02C01„9304„CC„00052€(Tenn.ÏCrim.€App.,€at€Jackson,€June€29,€1994),€òòpermóó.€òòtoóó€òòappóó.€òòdeniedóó,Ï(Tenn.€1994),€or€òòState€v.€Terryóó,€755€S.W.2d€854€(Tenn.€Crim.ÏApp.€1988),€the€decision€in€òòCheairsóó€appears€to€be€in€complianceÏwith€an€order€entered€by€our€supreme€court€in€òòState€v.€JosephÍHarvey€Cutrightóó,€No.€02C01„9108„CC„00175€(Tenn.,€at€Jackson,ÏMarch€25,€œ1992)(order€denying€application€for€permission€toÏappeal).›€€Because€the€range€classification€is€based€upon€factÏ(prior€criminal€history€of€the€defendant)€and€therefore€subjectÏto€plea€negotiation,€an€arrangement€as€that€made€in€òòMahleróó€isÏpermissible.€€Once€range€is€established,€however,€the€statuteÏprovides€specific€legal€boundaries€within€which€theÏdeterminative€sentence€must€fall.€€Here,€that€would€have€beenÏfrom€three€to€six€years€for€a€Range€I€offender.€€Any€sentenceÏoutside€the€statutory€range€of€sentences€would€be€illegal€andÏthus€a€void€sentence€for€purposes€of€post„conviction€relief.€ÏòòSeeóó€òòRonald€Lature€œMcCray€v.€Stateóó,€òòsupraóó.›€€Ìà àà àBased€upon€the€greater€weight€of€the€authoritiesÏavailable,€we€are€constrained€to€set€aside€this€sentence€asÏillegal€and€remand€the€cause€to€the€trial€court.€€Because€theÏsentence€proposed€in€the€plea€agreement€can€be€interpreted€asÏexceeding€the€statutory€limits,€the€trial€court€must€reject€theÏoriginal,€recommended€sentence.€€Thereafter,€the€proceedingsÏshall€be€governed€by€Tenn.€R.€Crim.€P.€11(e).€€òòSeeóó€òòState€v.ÏHodgesóó,€815€S.W.2d€151€(Tenn.€1991).€€ÌÌà àà àThe€plea€agreement€in€this€case€would€not€haveÍviolated€the€statute€had€it€expressly€provided€that€twoÏsentences€of€three€years€and€one€sentence€of€four€years€for€theÏthree€robbery€offenses€were€to€be€served€consecutively€in€orderÏto€arrive€at€the€ten„year€sentence.œ× ƒ; ××  ×›€€The€trial€court,€however,Ïmay€not€sentence€the€petitioner€consecutively€absent€either€anÏagreement€by€the€petitioner€or€the€presence€of€statutoryÏgrounds.€€òòSeeóó€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€40„35„115;€òòState€v.€Wilkersonóó,Ï905€S.W.2d€933,€938€(Tenn.€1995).€ÌÌà@ àIIÌà àà àNext,€the€petitioner€contends€that€he€did€notÏknowingly€and€voluntarily€enter€his€pleas€of€guilt.€€He€does€notÏcontend€that€the€trial€court€failed€to€follow€the€requiredÏprocedure.€€Instead,€he€asserts€that€he€did€not€understand€theÏdifferences€between€the€sentencing€ranges€and€that€he€did€not,Ïtherefore,€voluntarily€and€knowingly€enter€his€plea.€€€à àà àÌà àà àIn€òòBoykin€v.€Alabamaóó,€395€U.S.€238€(1969),€the€UnitedÏStates€Supreme€Court€ruled€that€defendants€should€be€advised€ofÏcertain€of€their€constitutional€rights€before€entering€pleas€ofÍguilt.€€Included€among€those€required€warnings€are€the€rightÏagainst€self„incrimination,€the€right€to€confront€witnesses,€andÏthe€right€to€a€trial€by€jury.€€òòIdóó.€at€243.€€The€overridingÏòòBoykinóó€requirement€is€that€the€guilty€plea€must€be€knowingly€andÏvoluntarily€made.€€òòIdóó.€at€242„44.€€In€òòState€v.€Mackeyóó,€553ÏS.W.2d€337€(Tenn.€1977),€our€supreme€court€established€aÏprocedure€for€trial€courts€to€follow€in€accepting€guilty€pleas.€€ÌÌà àà àThe€petitioner€testified€that€his€trial€counsel€toldÏhim€that€he€could€be€sentenced€up€to€fifteen€years€for€simpleÏrobbery.€€He€also€stated€that€the€trial€court€informed€him€atÏthe€guilty€plea€hearing€that€robbery€carried€a€sentence€of€threeÏto€fifteen€years€but€that€his€trial€counsel€and€the€trial€courtÏfailed€to€explain€that€only€a€sentence€of€three€to€six€years€wasÏpossible€under€Range€I.€€Petitionerððs€post„conviction€petitionÏstates€that€his€trial€counsel€œ"coerced"€and€"threatened"€him€toÏplead€guilty.€€The€petitioner€claims€on€appeal€that€theÏfollowing€testimony€at€the€guilty€plea€hearing€establishes€thatÏhe€did€not€knowingly€and€voluntarily€plead€guilty:ÌÓÓà8 àà8 àQ:€€[Judge]€Is€that€what€you€understand€theÏrecommendation€to€be?ÌÌà8 àà8 àA:€€[Petitioner]€Yes,€sir.€€I€got€oneÏquestion,€though.ÌÌà8 àà8 àQ:€€All€right.ÌÌà8 àà8 àA:€€What€do€Section€I€mean?ÌÌà8 àà8 àà àMr.€Googe:€I€think€heððs€talking€aboutÏrange€one€which€means€30€percent.ÌÌà8 àà8 àà àMr.€Allen:€That€means€30€percent€isÏwhat€heððs€„„€Ìà àÌà8 àà8 àQ:€Thirty€percent.ÌÌà8 àà8 àA:€Okay.ÌÌà8 àà8 àQ:€Thatððs€the€range€youððre€in.ÌÌà àà àA:€I€understand.€€€€€ÓÓÌTrial€counsel€testified€that€he€explained€the€entire€ranges€ofÏsentencing€to€the€petitioner€prior€to€the€sentencing€hearing.€Ìà àà àÌà àà àWe€find€that€because€he€was€unaware€that€the€agreedÏsentence€was€illegal,€the€petitioner€could€not€have€knowinglyÏand€voluntarily€plead€guilty.€€òòSeeóó€òòState€v.€Joseph€HarveyÏCutrightóó,€No.€02C01„9108„CC„00175€(Tenn.,€at€Jackson,€March€25,Ï1992)€(order€stating›€that€a€œ"sentence›€[outside€the€statutoryÏrange]€agreed€upon€between€the€State€and€defendant€is€a€nullityÏand€cannot€be€œwaived.").›€€Further,€the€judgment€may€not€beÏamended€to€reflect€a€sentence€consistent€with€the€statute€unlessÏthe€petitioner€knowingly€and€voluntarily€agrees€to€the€changes.ÌÌà àà àThe€convictions€are€set€aside.€€The€causes€areÏremanded€to€the€trial€court.ÌÌÓÓà àà àà àà àà à_____________________________________Ìà àà àà àà àà àGary€R.€Wade,€Judge€ÌÌCONCUR:ÌÌÌÌòò€€€€(See€Below)€€€€€€€€€€óóÌJohn€H.€Peay,€JudgeÌÌÌÌ_________________________ÌDavid€H.€Welles,€Judge€ÌÌÌÌÓÓà àà àI€concur€with€the€results€reached€by€the€majority.€ÏHowever,€I€again€express€the€same€concerns€that€I€expressed€inÏmy€separate€concerning€opinion€in€the€case€of€òòBill€R.€Dixon,ÏJr.,€v.€Stateóó,€No.€02C01„9503„CC„00070,€Madison€County€(Tenn.ÏCrim.€App.€filed€March€30,€1996,€at€Jackson).ÌÌÓÓÌà àà àà àà àà àà à______________________________Ìà àà àà àà àà àà àJOHN€H.€PEAY,€Judge