WPCd? ԹTYD65ðDrrW66NI)nyp͚ni.+q%.0%ejiT5|ůN/s(W<?cR"{vz4JM衫*@ ?l-[iQJp dFHS(3 #&EOB $XI֚`VaلԎ_[1DqfGJ5bUTe}h=Λ%#)X)0W\G>5FV04wF{nE/`!Q!&)BFC1G-L/y2IZobG}l]tU) 0v) 0`I* 0`* 0` + 0`i+ 0`+ 08), 0a, 023- 0e- 0:a. 0Y. 0. 0_/ 0 >0 0jH1 B2 02 0S4 D54 D-,5 0KY5 B*5 AS5!6 06 0D7 A7 D/z8 08 D/-: 0\: 06*; 0`; 0:h< 0^< 0<= 1e<= 0N=U6=U>%>U*c>>(>>>> 1u> 722?("  Z6Times New Roman Regular(`$.8dd8    \\IB01S02\CLERKJAC,,,,0C:\PROGRA~1\COREL\WORDPE~1\TEMPLATE\CUSTOM~1\CUSTOM~1\OPINION3.WPTC:\Program Files\Corel\WordPerfect Office 2000\Template\Custom WP Templates\Custom WP Templates\opinion3.wpt}1  C:\PROGRA~1\COREL\WORDPE~1\TEMPLATE\CUSTOM~1\REVISE~1.WPTC:\Program Files\Corel\WordPerfect Office 2000\Template\Custom WP Templates\revised standard opinion.wpt(I Z6Times New Roman RegularULevel 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5~/H\Opinion Summary3|xSDU_15?\Appellants Attorney Name & Appellant's Name.?\Appellees Attorney Name & Appellee's Name.*+ (_2623  ..1234567*G+M (_25   /%` ` hp x /23  ..  5+ ` hp x 5  9101112*D+M (_24   ," hp x ,23  ..  5+ ` hp x 5  *A+M (_23  ` ) hp x )23  ..  5+ ` hp x 5  *>+M (_22   &hhp x &23  ..  5+ ` hp x 5  *;+M (_21   #p x #23  ..  5+ ` hp x 5  *8+M (_20  h  p x 23  ..  5+ ` hp x 5  *5+M (_19   pp x 23  ..  5+ ` hp x 5  - -*2+M (_18    x 23  ..  5+ ` hp x 5  * (_1723  Ԁ*GM (_16   /%` ` hp x /23  Ԁ  5+ ` hp x 5  *DM (_15   ," hp x ,23  Ԁ  5+ ` hp x 5  *AM (_14  ` ) hp x )23  Ԁ  5+ ` hp x 5  *>M (_13   &hhp x &23  Ԁ  5+ ` hp x 5  *;M (_12   #p x #23  Ԁ  5+ ` hp x 5  *8M (_11  h  p x 23  Ԁ  5+ ` hp x 5  *5M (_10   pp x 23  Ԁ  5+ ` hp x 5  (2M &_9    x 23  Ԁ  5+ ` hp x 5  ( &_823  (GM &_7   /%` ` hp x /23   5+ ` hp x 5  (DM &_6   ," hp x ,23   5+ ` hp x 5  (AM &_5  ` ) hp x )23   5+ ` hp x 5  (>M &_4   &hhp x &23   5+ ` hp x 5  (;M &_3   #p x #23   5+ ` hp x 5  (8M &_2  h  p x 23   5+ ` hp x 5  (5M &_1   pp x 23   5+ ` hp x 5  &2M $_    x 23   5+ ` hp x 5  0.Normal<:Definition T<AA:Definition L , 5+ ` hp x 5  5+ ` hp x 586Definition(''&H1      (&H2  (&H3  (&H4 XXX (&H5  (&H6  20Address8MM6Blockquote , , 5+ ` hp x 5   5+ ` hp x 5,*CITE,dl*CODEKm<6X9`(Courier NewKSn\  `&Times New RomanS42Emphasis64Hyperlink    (|G2$ !.88dXXd8         0  =<:FollowedHype    4go2Keyboard Km<6X9`(Courier NewKSn\  `&Times New RomanS <:Preformatted/%  ,Kk %#/Km<6X9`(Courier NewKSn\  `&Times New RomanS/%  ,Kk %#/ d<:zBottom of 7b(X7  ?o%2A`Arial?  Sn\  `&Times New RomanS7Z(X7(|3$ !.88dXXd8     VVVV)!dxdx)!dxdx( $ Figure  1  &0 d d^_X`YE<<CLevel 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5(|3$ !.88dXXd8     ($$   1  X[Z&OLE 2.0 Box <=8C HKKKK\)1dxd<:zTop of For7d(X7  ?o%2A`Arial?  Sn\  `&Times New RomanS7Z(X7\)2dxd0KS.SampleKm<6X9`(Courier NewKSn\  `&Times New RomanS0.Strong 8dl6TypewriterKm<6X9`(Courier NewKSn\  `&Times New RomanS42Variable: 8HTML MarkupB      2 0CommentB  01234567 35;AGMSY_11.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.(O$<6X9`(Courier New\  `&Times New Roman%2A`Arial 3#37=CIQYag1.a.i.(1)(a)(i)1)a)ui) !.88dd8     _  88XXdd8   8@hh ]> INTHECOURTOFCRIMINALAPPEALSOFTENNESSEE  @%ATJACKSON#  ]>O#Ԉ    AssignedonBriefsNovember2,2004 >  XqX  # X XqJ#%  %%  %STATEOFTENNESSEEv.JONGLEN_AKINS_  XqX  0  Direct @@ %  %jAppealfromthe%  ԀCircuitCourt%for%  _Obion_% ԀCounty  " @@No.415% ! %!AԀ% " WilliamB._Acree_,Jr.,Judge%"e   @@*AV) ` dE<i` A j  @@TTNo.W200401140CCAR3CDFiledDecember8,_2004_ _  AV) ` dE<*` A +{  %  # X Xq# XqX # X XqC#% XqX TheDefendant,JonGlen_Akins_,pledguiltytoonecountoftheftofpropertyvaluedbetween V $10,000.00and$60,000.00,aclassCfelony.ThetrialcourtsentencedtheDefendanttothreeyears, < orderingthattheDefendantserve90daysinjail,followedbyprobation.TheDefendantappeals, " contendingthatthetrialcourterredbynotgrantinghimfullprobation.Findingnoerror,weaffirm  thejudgmentofthetrialcourt.  # X Xq# XqX c % $   Tenn.R.App.P.3AppealasofRight%$M ;Judgmentofthe% % CircuitCourtAffirmed%%   j Z   #  Xq # XqX. RobertW._Wedemeyer_,J.,deliveredtheopinionofthecourt,inwhich% & JerryL.Smithand%& # X Xq= # XqX #  Xq # XqX. _J.C._ 6 _McLin_#  Xqe # XqX. ,JJ.,% ' %'* joined. l %  JosephP._Atnip_,Dresden,Tennessee,%i fortheappellant,JonGlen_Akins_. 8 %  %$ PaulG.Summers,AttorneyGeneralandReporter;DavidH._Findley_# X Xq # XqX ,AssistantAttorneyGeneral;  ThomasA.Thomas,DistrictAttorneyGeneral;# X Xq # XqX ԀandKevin_McAlpin_ԀandJamesT.Cannon,Assistant  DistrictAttorneysGeneral,fortheappellee,StateofTennessee.     # X Xqe# XqX    # X Xqs# XqX OPINION L"" I.Facts # X Xq# 2## %   XqX      ThiscasearisesoutoftheDefendantsconvictionfortheftofpropertyvaluedbetween $N % $10,000.00and$60,000.00,aclassCfelony.InFebruaryof2004,an_Obion_ԀCountyGrandJury %4!& indictedtheDefendantforthisoffense,andtheDefendantpledguiltyonMarch12,2004.Atthe &"' guiltypleahearing,theStatetoldthetrialcourtthat,hadthecasegonetotrial,theevidencewould '#( haveshownthat,betweenJanuary28,2002andSeptember23,2003,theDefendantwasemployed (#) byWilliamsSausageCompany,asadeliveryman.Further,theStatesaidthat,comparingthe |)$* reportsthattheDefendantturnedintotheWilliamsSausageCompanywiththemerchandisethat b*%+ heturnedintothecompany,therewasadiscrepancyof$17,867.55. H+&,   AttheDefendantssentencinghearing,thefollowingoccurred.RogerWilliamstestifiedthat -d(. hewascurrentlythepresidentofWilliamsSausageCompanyandthathiscompanyemployedthe -J)/ Defendantforapproximatelysixandahalfyears.Hesaidthatbetween,January28,2002and  September23,2003,theDefendantwasa routesalesman.WilliamstestifiedthatWilliams  SausageCompanywouldshipproducttotheDefendantandtheDefendantwouldtakeresponsibility | forthisproductandthenwouldsellit,andthentheDefendantwoulddeliverittogrocerystoresand b restaurants.Williamssaidthathissalesmanagerbegannoticing inordinateamountofcredits H writtenontheDefendantsinvoicesandbeganinvestigating.Hesaidthatthemanagerdiscovered . ~ thattheDefendantwasalteringtheinvoicesaftergivingthemtohiscustomers.Theinvoiceswould  d saythattheDefendantwasgivingthecustomeramonetarycreditforreturnedproductorforsome  J otherreason,buttheDefendantwouldnotactuallygivethatmonetarycredittothestore,butwould  0 insteadkeepthemoneyforhimself.      Williamssaidthatheandhiscompanyattemptedtodeterminehowmuchmoneythe   DefendanthadtakenbyrequestingthattheDefendantscustomerssendthecompanytheircopies x  oftheinvoicesandthencomparingthoseinvoiceswiththeonesthattheDefendantsubmitted. ^  Baseduponthisdiscrepancy,WilliamssaidthatthecompanyterminatedtheDefendantand D  inventoriedhistruck.HetestifiedthattheDefendantstruck cameupquiteabitshort,too.In *z  otherwords,hehadprobablysoldproduct[and]...keptthemoney.Williamstestifiedthathe ` calculatedtheamountthattheDefendanthadstolen alittleover$17,000.00. F   JayHortontestifiedthathehasknowntheDefendantforapproximatelyoneyear,andhewas  currentlyemployedwiththeDefendant.HesaidthattheDefendantisthe bestneighborIveever  beenaroundandthatheisalsoagoodcoworker.HesaidthattheDefendanthaschildrenandhe  isalovingfatherthatcaresabouthiskidsandspendsalotoftimewiththem.Hetestifiedthatthe t DefendantschildrendonothaveamothersotheDefendantisafatherandmothertohischildren. Z HortonsaidthattheDefendantis agoodperson. @   Barbara_Tappen_ԀtestifiedthatshehasknowntheDefendantforeighttotenyears.Shesaid  \ thattheDefendantswife leftoverayearagoandthattheDefendanthasbeentakingcareofhis B kidsandhishouseallbyhimself.ShetestifiedthattheDefendantisgoodwithhischildrenandhe ( ispatientandhischildrenarerespectful._Tappen_ԀtestifiedthattheDefendantworkseverydayand  nevermissesaday.    DavidRusselltestifiedthattheDefendantishiswifesuncle.Russelltestifiedthathelived p!  besidetheDefendantforapproximatelythreeyears,andtheDefendanthelpedhimandhiswifebuy V"! ahome.RusselltestifiedthattheDefendantsdaughterbabysitsforhisdaughter,andtheDefendant <#" isadevotedfather. "$r#   Melba_Goins_ԀtestifiedthatsheistheDefendantsmotherandthatheisgoodwithhis %>!% children.ShesaidthattheDefendantswife wentonthewildsideandleft.Shesaidthatthe &$"& Defendantgaveherandherotherchildrenaplacetolivewhentheydidnothaveone. ' #'   TheDefendanttestifiedthathewascurrentlyemployedbyatimbercompanyinMississippi. )$) Hesaidthathehasasixteenyearolddaughter,athirteenyearoldson,atenyearolddaughterand l*%* afouryearolddaughter.TheDefendantsaidthathiswifelefthimonFebruary14,2003,togo R+&+  livewithherdrugdealer.Hesaidthat,beforeshemovedout,she successfullysiphonedoff.. 8,', .prettymucheverythingweowned.Hesaidthatshetookhisbankaccounts,creditcards,andany  moneyhehadinthehouse.TheDefendanttestifiedthat,twoweeksafterhiswifeleft,hestarted  gettinglatenoticesthatthephoneandcableweregoingtobeturnedoff.TheDefendantsaidthat, | manydays,heconsidered cashingitinandcallingitaday,but[his]childrenkept[him]goingand b gave[him]areasontokeepon.Hesaidthatwhathedidwascompletelywrong,butthechildren H hadtoeatandhadtohaveclothesandshelter.Hesaidtheyhadtohavethingstomakeupfortheir . ~ motherbeinggone.TheDefendantsaidthatheistryingtopaythecompanybackbyrefinancing  d hishouse,buthehasnotyetbeenabletodoso.  J   TheDefendanttoldthecourtthathischildrenwerehismainconcern,oneofwhomhad    debilitatingarthritisinherkneesandankles.TheDefendantreiteratedthathemadeaterrible    mistakeandthathe letanemotionalsituationovercome[his]betterjudgment.TheDefendantsaid   thathewouldearn,onaverage,approximately$400aweekworkingforWilliamsSausage x  Company.Oncrossexamination,theDefendantadmittedthathebeganstealingfromthecompany ^  priortohiswifeleaving,butexplainedthathedidsotocoverupforherdrugproblem. D  #cddd  Thetrialcourtthenstated: ` 8  Inimposingasentenceuponthe[_D]efendant_,theCourtconsidersmanythings.The , Courtconsiderstheevidenceinthisrecord,includingtheevidenceattheguiltyplea,  theevidencepresentedtoday,thePreSentenceReport,testimonyofthewitnesses,  thetestimonyinparticularof[theDefendant],theVictimImpactStatement,the  argumentofcounsel,theattorneys,andalsotheprinciplesofsentencing.t   8   ` Thecourtfindsthat[theDefendant]isaRangeIstandardoffender.Thereis @ onemitigatingfactorwhichapplies.No.1,thedefendantscriminalconductneither &v causednorthreatenedseriousbodilyinjury.Butthereisoneenhancingfactorwhich  \ alsoapplies,the[_D]efendant_Ԁabusedapositionofprivatetrust.Inthisregard,[the B Defendant]waschargedinhisjobofdeliveringproducttocustomersandcollecting ( themoney.Therewasagreatdealoffaithputinhim.Heabusedthattrustovera  periodofmanymonths.Thus,thereisonemitigatingfactorandoneenhancing  factor,whichmakes[theDefendant]aRangeIstandardoffender.    8   ` TheCourtlooksto_T.C.A._Ԁ4035102,andfindstheseprinciplesapply.Every V"! defendantshallbepunishedbyasentencejustlydeservedinrelationtothe <#" seriousnessoftheoffense.Secondly,thischapteristoassurefairandconsistent "$r# treatmentofall_defendants_Ԁbyeliminatingunjustifieddisparityinsentencingand %X $ providingafairsenseofpredictabilitytothecriminallawanditssanctions.And3(a), %>!% punishmentshallbeimposedtopreventcrimeandpromoterespectforthelawby &$"& providinganeffectivegeneraldeterrenceforthoselikelytoviolatethecriminallaws ' #' oftheState.(#(   8   ` TheCourtfindsthereisaneedfordeterrenceinthiscasebecausetheftisa l*%* veryseriousoffenseinthisjurisdictioninthatthereareagreatmanycrimesoftheft R+&+ andrelatedtypeoffenseswhicharecommitted.Also,the[_D]efendant_scrimewas 8,', theresultofintentionalconductmotivatedbyadesiretoprofitorgainfromcriminal  behavior.   8   ` TheCourtwillnotethat[theDefendant]attemptstoplaceaconsiderablepart b oftheblameuponhiswife.HistestimonywasthatsheleftonFebruary23rdoflast H year,butthatthecrimesthathecommittedoccurredformorethanoneyearbefore . ~ sheleft. d   8   ` [TheDefendant]ispresumedtobea...favorablecandidateforalternative  0 sentencing.Hehasbeenconvictedofa[_c]lass_ԀCfelony.HeisaRangeIoffender.    TheCourtlooksatthesentencingconsiderationsin4035103todeterminewhether    ornotanyevidencehasbeenpresentedbytheStatetorebutthatpresumption.The   Courtfindsthatsomeevidencehasbeen,inthatconfinementorsomeconfinement x  isnecessarytoprovideaneffectivedeterrenttootherslikelytocommitsimilar ^  offenses.D    8   ` Thereareseveralfactors.The[_D]efendant_Ԁasksforalternativesentencing, ` andthereareseveralfactorsthattheCourtlooksat.Thenatureandcircumstancesof F thecriminalconductinvolved,thisisastrikeagainst[theDefendant].Hecommitted , manyactsofcrime.Thiscoveredalongperiodoftime.AndIthinktheressome  difference.IfyouweretowalkintoWalMartandpickuponeitemandstealthatand  carrythatoutandthenneverdothatagain;ontheotherhand,Idontknowhowmany  differentcriminalactsyoudid,butyouhadcriminalintentforaperiodofmany t months,welloveroneyear,andonnumerousoccasions,youstolefromyour Z employer.@   8   ` ThesecondfactthattheCourtlooksatisthe[_D]efendant_spotentialorlack  \ ofpotentialforrehabilitation,includingtheriskthatduringtheperiodofprobation, B the[_D]efendant_Ԁwillcommitanothercrime.Thisisafactorinyourfavor.TheCourt ( findsthereisapotentialforrehabilitation.Andfromthetestimonyofyouandyour  witnesses,Idontthinkthatitisparticularlylikelythatyouwillcommitthiscrime  again.    8   ` Next,welookatwhetherasentenceoffullprobationwouldundulydepreciate V"! theseriousnessoftheoffense.TheCourtisconcernedthatitis.Again,youstole <#" moneyonmanyoccasionsoveralongperiodoftime."$r#   8   ` Andfinally,whetherasentenceotherthanfullprobationwouldprovidean %>!% effectivedeterrenttootherslikelytocommitsimilarcrimes.TheCourtfindsthere &$"& isneedfordeterrenceinthiscase.' #'   8   ` Thepresumptivesentenceinthiscaseisthreeyears.Theresoneenhancing )$) factorwhichwouldincreasethat,buttheresonemitigatingfactorwhichwould l*%* reducethat.Sothesentenceshallbethreeyears.R+&+    8,', 8   ` TakingintoaccountallthecriteriaIvejustannounced,alsotakinginto  accounttheattitudeofyouremployer,Mr.Williams,theCourtisgoingtograntsome  alternativesentencing.Imgoingtosentenceyoutothreeyears,tobeservedinthe | TennesseeDepartmentofCorrection.Thattimeshallbesuspendedexceptfor90 b days,whichyoushallserve.Youshallreceivecreditforonedaypreviouslyserved.H   TheDefendantappealsthejudgmentofthetrialcourt,assertingthatthetrialcourterredbynot  d grantinghimfullprobation.  J   II.Analysis     I  Whenadefendantchallengesthelengthormannerofserviceofasentence,itisthedutyof   thisCourttoconductadenovoreviewoftherecordwithapresumptionthat thedeterminations x  madebythecourtfromwhichtheappealistakenarecorrect.Tenn.CodeAnn.4035401(d) ^  (2003).Thispresumptionis conditionedupontheaffirmativeshowingintherecordthatthetrial D  courtconsideredthesentencingprinciplesandallrelevantfactsandcircumstances.Statev.Ross, *z  49S.W.3d833,847(Tenn.2001)(quotingStatev._Pettus_,986S.W.2d540,543(Tenn.1999));State ` v._Ashby_,823S.W.2d166,169(Tenn.1991).Thepresumptiondoesnotapplytothelegal F conclusionsreachedbythetrialcourtinsentencingadefendantortothedeterminationsmadebythe , trialcourtwhicharepredicatedupon_uncontroverted_Ԁfacts.Statev.Dean,76S.W.3d352,377(Tenn.  _Crim_.App.2001);Statev.Butler,900S.W.2d305,311(Tenn._Crim_.App.1994);Statev.Smith,891  S.W.2d922,929(Tenn._Crim_.App.1994).Inconductingadenovoreviewofasentence,wemust  consider:(a)anyevidencereceivedatthetrialand/orsentencinghearing;(b)the_presentence_Ԁreport; t _(c_)theprinciplesofsentencing;(d)theargumentsofcounselrelativetosentencingalternatives;(e) Z thenatureandcharacteristicsoftheoffense;(f)anymitigatingorstatutoryenhancementfactors;(g) @ anystatementsmadebythedefendantonhisorherownbehalf;and(h)thedefendantspotentialor &v lackofpotentialforrehabilitationortreatment.Tenn.CodeAnn.4035210(2003);Statev.  \ Taylor,63S.W.3d400,411(Tenn._Crim_.App.2001).Thepartychallengingasentenceimposedby B thetrialcourthastheburdenofestablishingthatthesentenceiserroneous.Tenn.CodeAnn.40 ( 35401(d),Sentencing_Commn_Ԁ_Cmts_.Moreover,therecordmustreflectthatthecourthasweighed  allofthefactorsinreachingitsdetermination.Statev._Bonestel_,871S.W.2d163,168(Tenn._Crim_.  App.1993)(citingStatev._Herron_,767S.W.2d151,156(Tenn.1989)).Thecourtmustexplainon   therecordwhythedefendantdoesnotqualifyunderitsanalysis,and,ifthecourthasbasedits p!  determinationononlysomeofthefactors,itmustexplainwhythesefactorsoutweightheothers.Id. V"!  nXqXX Xq# XqXXnXqW#  Inthecaseundersubmission,weconcludethatthereisampleevidencethatthetrialcourt "$r# consideredthesentencingprinciplesandallrelevantfactsandcircumstances.Therefore,wereview %X $ itsdecisiondenovowithapresumptionofcorrectness.Accordingly,solongasthetrialcourt %>!% compliedwiththepurposesandproceduresofthe1989SentencingActanditsfindingsaresupported &$"& bythefactualrecord,thisCourtmaynotdisturbthissentenceevenifwewouldhavepreferreda ' #' differentresult.SeeTenn.CodeAnn.4035210,Sentencing_Commn_Ԁ_Cmts_;Statev.Fletcher,805 (#( S.W.2d785,789(Tenn._Crim_.App.1991).Wenotethatthedefendantbearstheburdenofshowing )$) thatthesentenceisimproper.Tenn.CodeAnn.4035401,Sentencing_Commn_Ԁ_Cmts_.;_Ashby_,823 l*%* S.W.2dat169. R+&+  8,',   WenowturntodecidewhethertheDefendantinthecaseundersubmissionhasproventhat  hissentence,whichincluded90daysofincarceration,wasimproper.Adefendantiseligiblefor  alternativesentencingifthesentenceactuallyimposediseightyearsorless.Tenn.CodeAnn.40 | 35303(a)(2003).nXqXX XqAdefendantwhoisanespeciallymitigatedorstandardoffenderconvictedofa b classCfelonyispresumedtobeafavorablecandidateforalternativesentencingoptionsinthe H absenceofevidencetothecontrary.Tenn.CodeAnn.4035102(b)(6)(2003).# XqXXnXq]#ԀIndetermining . ~ whethertograntordenyprobation,thetrialcourtmayconsiderthefollowing:thecircumstancesof  d theoffense;thedefendantscriminalrecord;backgroundandsocialhistory;thedefendantsphysical  J andmentalhealth;thedeterrenteffectonothercriminalactivity;andthelikelihoodthatprobation  0 isinthebestinterestsofboththepublicandthedefendant.Statev.Parker,932S.W.2d945,958    (Tenn._Crim_.App.1996).Adefendantbearstheburdenofestablishingsuitabilityforprobation.    Tenn.CodeAnn.4035303(b);Ashby,823%  %aS.W.2dat169.     TennesseeCodeAnnotatedsection4035103(1)(2003)statesthat: ^  8  Sentencesinvolvingconfinementshouldbebasedonthefollowingconsiderations: *z  (A)Confinementisnecessarytoprotectsocietybyrestrainingadefendantwhohas ` alonghistoryofcriminalconduct;(B)Confinementisnecessarytoavoid F depreciatingtheseriousnessoftheoffenseorconfinementisparticularlysuitedto , provideaneffectivedeterrencetootherslikelytocommitsimilaroffenses;or(C)  Measureslessrestrictivethanconfinementhavefrequentlyorrecentlybeenapplied  unsuccessfullytothedefendant....   Additionally, [t]hepotentialorlackofpotentialfortherehabilitationortreatmentofthedefendant Z shouldbeconsideredindeterminingthesentencealternativeorlengthofatermtobeimposed.... @ Tenn.CodeAnn.4035103(5).Thetrialcourtmayconsiderenhancingandmitigatingfactors &v whendeterminingadefendantssentence.Tenn.CodeAnn.nXqXX Xq4035114,113(2003).  \   Insentencingadefendant,thepresumptivesentenceforadefendantconvictedofaClassC, ( felonyshallbetheminimumsentenceintherangeifnoenhancingormitigatingfactorsarepresent.  # XqXXnXqg#Tenn.CodeAnn.nXqXX Xq4035# XqXXnXqh#nXqXX Xq210_(c_).Whensuchfactorsarepresent, thecourtmuststartatthe  minimumsentenceintherange,enhancethesentencewithintherangeasappropriate# XqXXnXqh#forthe   enhancementfactors,andthenreducethesentencewithintherangeasappropriateforthemitigating p!  factors.Tenn.CodeAnn.nXqXX Xq4035210(e).# XqXXnXqj#nXqXX Xq V"! # XqXXnXqj#  Inthecaseundersubmission,theDefendantcontendsthatthetrialcourterredwhenitdenied "$r# himfullprobationbecause:thetrialcourtimproperlyappliedoneenhancementfactor;confinement %X $ isnotnecessarytoprotectsociety;confinementisnotnecessarytoavoiddepreciatingtheseriousness %>!% oftheseoffenses;andtherecorddoesnotindicatethatmeasureslessrestrictivethanconfinement &$"& havebeenfrequentlyorrecentlyappliedunsuccessfullytohim.TheDefendantassertsthat,pursuant ' #' to_Blakely_Ԁv._Washintgon_,542U.S.___,124S.Ct.2531(2004),theoneenhancementfactorthatthe (#( trialcourtfoundapplicablewasimproperlyapplied.TheDefendantiscorrectinthisregard, )$) however,thetrialcourtsentencedtheDefendanttothepresumptiveminimumsentence.Further,the l*%*  trialcourtdidnotbaseitsdecisiontodenytheDefendantfullprobationontheenhancementfactor R+&+ thatitfoundapplicable,but,rather,itcitedmultipleotherreasonsintherecord.Therefore,any  _Blakely_errorisclearlyharmlessbeyondareasonabledoubt.     WhensentencingtheDefendant,thetrialcourtnotedthepresumptioninfavorofalternative b sentencingfortheDefendant,andthenthetrialcourtdeterminedthattheStaterebuttedthis H presumptionpursuanttoTennesseeCodeAnnotatedsection4035103.Thetrialcourtfoundthat . ~  someevidencewaspresentedthat someconfinementisnecessarytoprovideaneffectivedeterrent  d tootherslikelytocommitsimilaroffenses.Further,thetrialcourtfoundthatthenatureand  J circumstancesoftheDefendantsoffenseweresuchthatsomeincarcerationwasnecessary.Thetrial  0 courtnotedthattheDefendanthadacriminalintenttostealoveraperiodofoverayearandthat,on    numerousoccasions,hestolefromhisemployer.ThetrialcourtalsofoundthattheDefendants    potentialforrehabilitationwasafactorinhisfavor,butthenfoundthatasentenceoffullprobation   woulddepreciatetheseriousnessofhisoffense.Additionally,thetrialcourtfoundthattherewasa x  needfordeterrenceinthiscase.Weconcludethattheevidenceintherecorddoesnotpreponderate ^  againstthesefindingsofthetrialcourt,andwe,therefore,affirmthetrialcourtsjudgment. D  I@UU" III.Conclusion  `   Inaccordancewiththeforegoing,weconcludethetrialcourtcommittednoreversibleerror , whenitdeniedtheDefendantsrequestforfullprobation.Therefore,thejudgmentofthetrialcourt  isAFFIRMED.     `     h     ____________________________________ Z    `     h     ROBERTW._WEDEMEYER_,_JUDGEQ  _Q  Q  Q  Q   @ v