ÿWPC ùYµ^fýº{:”Ì{õ´*ˆå¢Óù=‹‰Ò–ÂO–¢íz˜íúµþ•¡Ôkä)Dò5 ·1äˆåÆãV9Óht — ¸‘÷}ºíÓ»9¼j¶×QëMžî»Gu ším„ùÑÃFîJ…|m ;å€g/¾F ç¿b?à+•®M›q†ÐÆtQ¹¬æ‚„Žì»(á ,c„NÃöŒ»̲˜HÁ[ÆÅ¸88è]ºS§¬¥ã"2¾âç‰ Šd‚'’’R\Áb ƒY6¾ž3BŒ±t%1 ûÜ?JYνßÞʦºÁ^ìàãzŒ¥þ¦ÏrM=û õUÑ©ç½zW\[q1àI4”†J¼Ãc„½“&åѧˆy’ Hëõ Fñ~Lú¬ð?’ÔåÝIÈ ñ!I er£Z]hµ|ðlNª¶Í "M$I2êš>› Ã®Æ '{ƒ`½xýcžâB¨@o¡/(W⹿¯ZˆðZªápy„«.¦›£Õâê¼Þg3-!(˜¢•o”|ß2O” W!öè·¸'Ç*ÉT œ³ýôL¦`äT´×r¯kÈwö§²Ê¹F'0›¶ó´gS³,ÿyh‡ŠC‰ÈjA”«è94ß×F«Ì<{W‡b %\^ b 0ˆnUNöwD4H\ zkÒå· m¹ #ÁÐ Ð Æ‘ ÆW Æ Æã 0D©NíííEïñññññññññññññññññññññññbùùùùùùùùùùùùùùùùùùùùùùùùùùùùùùùùùùùù 0ë Bìì 0¤  D3­ D-à 0K   ASXÆ« 0¤q 0D A«Y»¢š-s (`£ª$¡¡Ñ€.ÑÑ8€½­»»d»»d8ÑÑ ý ÑÓ  Ó(í€"  Z6Times New Roman Regular3j1,  3|x ˜C:\PROGRA~1\COREL\WORDPE~1\TEMPLATE\CUSTOM~1\REVISE~1.WPTC:\Program Files\Corel\WordPerfect Office 2000\Template\Custom WP Templates\revised standard opinion.wptÿU‹ÿÀÀÀ˜HP LaserJet 4050ÈÈÈÈÈÈÈÈ0Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5‚Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5„Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5…Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5(#Ã$òòÚ  Ú0Ú  Úóó - ù-(|G2öÔ$¤¤Ý ƒ£ª!ÝÑ€.ÑÑ8€ »»dd8ÑÑ ý ÑÓ  ÓÝ  Ýà  àòòÚ  Ú0Ú  ÚóóÔ€ô¨eò»»Ô d(|3`$££Ý ƒ£ª!ÝÑ€.ÑÑ8€ »»dd8ÑÑ ý ÑÓ  ÓÝ  ÝVVVV'ÿÿdxd)!ÈÈÈÈdxdx( ±þ$’’ò òFigure€Ú  Ú1Ú  Úó ó^_X`YEþÿ<<CÿÿƒLevel 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5(|3`$¢¢Ý ƒ£ª!ÝÑ€.ÑÑ8€ »»dd8ÑÑ ý ÑÓ  ÓÝ  Ý($$””ò òÚ  Ú1Ú  Úó óX[Z&OLE 2.0 Box <=8ÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿCÿÿ HKKKKÝ ƒ£ª!ÝÑ€.ÑÑ8€ »»ddÈ8ÑÑ ý ÑÓ  ÓÝ  ÝÔ_ÔÑ  ÑÔ€¼ »»»ÔÑ8€ZqXXdì»»d8ÑÑ  Ñà@ttìàÔ‡î l ÔIN€THE€COURT€OF€CRIMINAL€APPEALS€OF€TENNESSEEˆÐ ° Ðà@88$ìàAT€KNOXVILLE€Ô#†¼ »îî l #ԈРÖ& ÐÓ  ÓJuly€24,€2002€SessionÐ üL ÐÔ‡XZqX»¼ ÔÌò òÔ#†¼ »XXZqü#Ô€òòóóÔ_ÔSHANNAÔ_Ô€DEAN€ALDER€€v.Ô‡XZqX»¼ Ôó ó€€ò òÔ#†¼ »XXZq~#ÔSTATE€OF€TENNESSEE€ó óÔ‡XZqX»¼ ÔÐ úJ ÐÌò òDirect€ó óà@@½½ìàò òAppeal€from€the€Criminal€Court€for€Knox€CountyÐ ú J Ðà@@øøìàNo.€64064€€€€€€Mary€Beth€Ô_ÔLeibowitzÔ_Ô,€JudgeÐ æ 6 ÐÌÌà@@ìì*ìàßA€V) °°` d€÷E<©` AßÐ ªú  ÐÌà@@TTìàNo.€E2002„00287„CCA„R3„PCÐ ¥õ  ÐAugust€28,€Ô_Ô2002Ô_ÔÐ ‘á  ÐßA€V) °°` dE<|` AßÐ }Í  Ðó óÌÓ  ÓThe€petitioner€appeals€the€denial€of€her€petition€for€habeas€corpus€relief.€€She€contends€the€trial€courtÐ xÈ  Ðwas€without€authority€to€revoke€her€judicial€diversion€after€her€diversionary€probation€expired,Ð d´ Ðabsent€the€issuance€of€a€revocation€warrant€prior€to€its€expiration.€€She,€therefore,€argues€the€trialÐ P  Ðcourt€was€without€jurisdiction€when€it€revoked€judicial€diversion,€was€consequently€withoutÐ <Œ Ðjurisdiction€when€it€sentenced€her€to€additional€years€of€probation,€and€was€without€jurisdiction€whenÐ (x Ðit€subsequently€issued€a€probation€revocation€warrant.€€We€agree€and€reverse€the€denial€of€habeasÐ d Ðcorpus€relief.€€Ð P ÐÌò òTenn.€R.€App.€P.€3€Appeal€as€of€Right;€Judgment€of€the€Criminal€Court€Reversed;€Remandedó óÐ Ø( ÐÌòòÔ#†¼ »àXZqÞ#ÔÔ‡XZqX.¼ ÔJoe€G.€Riley,óó€J.,€delivered€the€opinion€of€the€court,€in€which€òòDavid€H.€Wellesóó€and€òòJerry€L.€Smith,Ð ° ÐJJ.óó,€joined.Ð œì ÐÌHerbert€S.€Ô_ÔMoncierÔ_Ô,€Knoxville,€Tennessee,€for€the€appellant,€Ô_ÔShannaÔ_Ô€Dean€Alder.Ð tÄ ÐÌPaul€G.€Summers,€Attorney€General€and€Reporter;€Kathy€D.€Ô_ÔAslingerÔ_Ô,€Assistant€Attorney€General;Ð L œ ÐRandall€E.€Ô_ÔNicholsÔ_Ô,€District€Attorney€General;€and€Patricia€A.€Ô_ÔCristilÔ_Ô,€Assistant€District€AttorneyÐ 8!ˆ  ÐGeneral,€for€the€appellee,€State€of€Tennessee.€€Ð $"t! ÐÌò òÌà@66'ìàOPINIONˆÐ è$8 $ ÐÔ#†¼ »XXZqÌ#ÔÔ‡XZqX»¼ Ôó óÌòòóóÔ#†¼ »XXZq #ÔÔ€XZqX»¼ Ôà  àOn€September€29,€1997,€the€petitioner€pled€guilty€to€vehicular€homicide.€€The€trial€courtÐ À&"& Ðentered€an€order€placing€her€on€judicial€diversion€and€placed€her€on€three€years€of€supervisedÐ ¬'ü"' Ðprobation.€€Thus,€the€petitionerððs€diversionary€period€was€set€to€expire€September€29,€2000.€€Ð ˜(è#( ÐÌà  àThe€petitionerððs€probation€officer€submitted€a€violation€report€directly€to€the€trial€judge€onÐ p*À%* ÐOctober€5,€1999,€indicating€a€fee€arrearage.€€The€report€stated€no€revocation€warrant€was€beingÐ \+¬&+ Ðrequested.€€There€is€no€indication€the€petitioner€received€a€copy€of€the€report,€nor€was€it€filed€withÐ H,˜', Ðthe€court€clerk.€€No€motion€was€filed€by€the€state€to€revoke€diversion.Ð 4-„(-ýà ÐÔ_Ô‡à  àOn€August€23,€2000,€the€probation€officer€submitted€another€violation€report€directly€to€theÐ ° Ðtrial€judge€indicating€the€petitioner€had€positive€drug€screens€in€June€and€July,€2000,€and€otherÐ œì Ðviolations.€€The€report€requested€that€diversion€be€revoked.€€Again,€there€is€no€indication€theÐ ˆØ Ðpetitioner€received€a€copy€of€the€report,€nor€was€it€filed€with€the€court€clerk.€€According€to€the€trialÐ tÄ Ðjudge,€the€report€was€placed€in€the€trial€judgeððs€personal€file.€€No€revocation€warrant€was€issued,€andÐ `° Ðno€motion€was€filed€by€the€state€to€revoke€diversion.Ð L œ ÐÌà  àAlthough€the€record€is€somewhat€unclear,€the€case€was€apparently€set€for€a€ð ðcheckpointðð€onÐ $ t ÐSeptember€15,€2000.€€By€letter€dated€September€7,€2000,€from€the€probation€officer,€the€petitionerÐ  ` Ðwas€notified€to€appear€on€September€15th.€€The€letter€did€not€state€that€any€violation€had€been€filed.€Ð ü L  ÐThe€trial€court's€minute€entry€for€September€15òòthóó€simply€indicates€that€ð ð[t]his€case€is€continued€toÐ è 8  ÐNovember€3,€2000.ðð€€The€trial€judge€stated€that€her€recollection€of€that€appearance€was€that€theÐ Ô$  Ðparties€appeared€and€were€made€aware€of€possible€violations,€and€the€case€was€reset€to€NovemberÐ À  Ð3,€2000,€to€allow€the€petitioner€to€secure€new€counsel€because€her€then„attorney€had€become€a€judge.€Ð ¬ü  ÐHowever,€no€evidence€was€introduced€concerning€this€September€15òòthóó€appearance€other€than€theÐ ˜è  Ðminute€entry.€€There€is€no€indication€in€the€record€before€this€court€that€the€petitioner€received€a€copyÐ „Ô  Ðof€the€violation€report€at€this€appearance,€nor€is€there€competent€evidence€in€the€record€to€indicateÐ pÀ Ðpetitionerððs€acknowledgment€of€being€charged€with€a€violation€or€the€details€of€any€allegedÐ \¬ Ðviolations.€€Certainly,€there€is€no€indication€the€petitioner€waived€the€filing€of€a€revocation€warrant.€Ð H˜ ÐFurther,€it€is€undisputed€that€a€revocation€warrant€was€never€issued.Ð 4„ ÐÌà  àOn€November€3,€2000,€the€trial€court€entered€a€judgment€of€conviction€revoking€judicialÐ  \ Ðdiversion€and€sentencing€the€petitioner€to€three€years€of€probation.€€Neither€a€revocation€warrant€norÐ øH Ða€motion€by€the€state€to€revoke€diversion€was€ever€filed.€€The€defendant€did€not€appeal€the€judgment.€Ð ä4 ÐÌà  àOn€March€1,€2001,€a€probation€violation€warrant€was€issued€alleging€a€positive€drug€screenÐ ¼  Ðand€failure€to€pay€probation€fees.€€On€March€21,€2001,€the€defendant,€with€different€counsel,€filedÐ ¨ø Ða€motion€to€dismiss€the€probation€revocation€warrant€in€which€she€alleged€the€November€2000Ð ”ä Ðjudgment€of€conviction€against€her€was€void€because€it€was€entered€after€the€diversionary€periodÐ €Ð Ðexpired.€€The€motion€was€denied€by€the€trial€court.€€This€court€denied€the€petitionerððs€request€for€anÐ l¼ Ðinterlocutory€appeal€and€/or€extraordinary€appeal.€€òòSeeóó€òòState€v.€Shanna€Alderóó,€E2001„01425„CCA„Ð X ¨ ÐR9„CD€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.€July€28,€2001,€at€Knoxville),€òòperm.€to€app.€deniedóó€(Tenn.€2001).€Ð D!” ÐÌà  àThe€petitioner€filed€the€instant€application€for€post„conviction€relief€and€for€habeas€corpusÐ #l! Ðrelief€on€September€10,€2001,€which€was€denied€by€the€trial€court€on€January€18,€2002.€€The€trialÐ $X" Ðcourt€held€the€petitionerððs€period€of€diversion€did€not€expire€automatically€at€the€end€of€the€threeÐ ô$D # Ðyears€in€the€absence€of€an€order€of€discharge€from€diversion€and,€therefore,€it€retained€authority€toÐ à%0!$ Ðsentence€the€defendant€when€it€entered€judgment€on€November€3,€2000.€€It€further€held€theÐ Ì&"% ÐNovember€2000€sentence€did€not€violate€double€jeopardy.€€Ð ¸'#& ЀÌÌÌÐ h+¸&* Ðà@À À ìàò òI.€POST„CONVICTION€RELIEF€AND€HABEAS€CORPUS€€ó óˆÐ ° ÐÌà  àThe€petitioner€seeks€post„conviction€and€habeas€corpus€relief.€€She€argues€the€NovemberÐ ˆØ Ð2000€judgment€of€conviction€and€resulting€sentence€are€void€due€to€the€trial€courtððs€absence€ofÐ tÄ Ðjurisdiction€after€the€diversionary€period€expired.€€We€must€agree.€€Ð `° ÐÌà  àGrounds€for€post„conviction€relief€exist€when€a€conviction€or€sentence€is€void€or€voidableÐ 8 ˆ Ðdue€to€the€abridgment€of€a€constitutional€right.€€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€40„30„203€(1997);€òòState€v.Ð $ t ÐWilsonóó,€31€S.W.3d€189,€194€(Tenn.€2000).€€A€writ€of€habeas€corpus€may€issue€only€where€it€is€plainÐ  ` Ðfrom€the€record€the€court€lacked€jurisdiction€or€authority€to€sentence€a€defendant€or€the€sentence€hasÐ ü L  Ðexpired.€€òòDixon€v.€Hollandóó,€70€S.W.3d€33,€36€(Tenn.€2002).òòóó€€Ð è 8  ÐÌà  àAppellate€review€of€the€trial€court's€findings€of€fact€in€a€post„conviction€proceeding€is€òòdeÐ À  Ðnovoóó€with€a€presumption€of€correctness,€while€review€of€questions€of€law€is€òòde€novoóó€with€noÐ ¬ü  Ðpresumption€of€correctness.€€òòMiller€v.€Stateóó,€54€S.W.3d€743,€745€(Tenn.€2001).€€The€determinationÐ ˜è  Ðof€whether€habeas€corpus€relief€should€be€granted€is€a€question€of€law;€therefore,€appellate€reviewÐ „Ô  Ðis€òòde€novoóó€with€no€presumption€of€correctness.€€òòMcLaney€v.€Bellóó,€59€S.W.3d€90,€92€(Tenn.€2001).€Ð pÀ ÐThe€material€facts€before€this€court€are€undisputed,€and€our€review€is€limited€to€questions€of€law.€Ð \¬ ÐTherefore,€we€review€the€trial€courtððs€conclusions€òòde€novoóó€with€no€presumption€of€correctness.€€Ð H˜ ÐÌÌà@99ìàò òII.€JUDICIAL€DIVERSIONˆÐ  \ Ðó óÌà  àA€defendant€who€pleads€guilty€or€is€found€guilty€of€certain€offenses€may€be€allowed€judicialÐ ä4 Ðdiversion,€a€statutory€process€by€which€the€trial€court€may€defer€further€proceedings€without€enteringÐ Ð  Ða€judgment€of€conviction.€€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€40„35„313(a)(1)(A)€(Supp.€2001).€€The€defendant€isÐ ¼  Ðplaced€on€probation€with€reasonable€conditions€for€a€specified€period€of€time€not€exceeding€theÐ ¨ø Ðmaximum€sentence€for€the€offense.€€òòIdóó.€€If€the€defendant€then€violates€the€terms€and€conditions€ofÐ ”ä Ðthe€diversionary€probation,€the€trial€court€may€enter€an€adjudication€of€guilt€and€proceed€to€sentenceÐ €Ð Ðthe€defendant.€€òòId.óó€at€(a)(2).€€Ð l¼ ÐÌà  àIf€it€is€alleged€that€a€defendant€on€judicial€diversion€has€violated€the€terms€and€conditions€ofÐ D!” Ðdiversionary€probation,€the€trial€court€should€follow€the€same€procedures€as€those€used€for€ordinaryÐ 0"€  Ðprobation€revocations.€€òòState€v.€Johnsonóó,€15€S.W.3d€515,€519€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.€1999).€€TheseÐ #l! Ðprocedures€are€set€forth€in€Tennessee€Code€Annotation€section€40„35„311€(Supp.€2001).€€òòId.óó€€WhenÐ $X" Ða€trial€court€learns€a€defendant€has€allegedly€violated€his€or€her€probation,€the€trial€court€should€issueÐ ô$D # Ða€probation€revocation€warrant.€€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€40„35„311(a)€(Supp.€2001).€€If€the€trial€court,Ð à%0!$ Ðfollowing€a€hearing,€determines€by€a€preponderance€of€the€evidence€that€the€defendant€has€indeedÐ Ì&"% Ðviolated€the€conditions€of€probation,€the€trial€court€may€revoke€the€defendantððs€probation.€€òòId.óó€at€(e).€Ð ¸'#& Ѐ€€€€Ð ¤(ô#' Ðà  àGenerally,€revocation€may€occur€only€within€the€probationary€period.€€òòState€v.€Shafferóó,€45Ð )à$( ÐS.W.3d€553,€555€(Tenn.€2001);€òòseeóó€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€40„35„310€(1997).€€However,€if€a€probationÐ |*Ì%) Ðrevocation€òòwarrantóó€is€issued€within€the€term€of€probation,€it€tolls€the€limitation€of€time€in€which€theÐ h+¸&* Ðcourt€may€act€to€revoke€probation.€€òòShafferóó,€45€S.W.3d€at€555òò;óó€òòState€v.€Clarkóó,€970€S.W.2d€516,€518Ð ° Ð(Tenn.€Crim.€App.€1998).€€The€filing€of€a€probation€violation€òòreportóó€during€the€probation€term€isÐ œì Ðinsufficient€to€toll€the€limitations€period.€€òòóóòòState€v.€Randall€Anthonyóó,€No.€W2000„02234„CCA„R3„Ð ˆØ ÐCD,€2001€WL€792609,€at€*4€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.€July€6,€2001,€at€Jackson).€€Thus,€it€is€the€filing€ofÐ tÄ Ða€revocation€òòwarrantóó,€not€the€òòreportóó,€that€tolls€the€limitations€period.€€òòSeeóó€òògenerallyóó,€òòShafferóó,€45Ð `° ÐS.W.3d€at€555.€Ð L œ ÐÌà  àThe€state€argues€that€the€trial€court€had€continuing€jurisdiction€until€such€time€as€it€enteredÐ $ t Ðan€order€terminating€the€petitionerððs€judicial€diversion.€€If€this€were€correct,€the€trial€court€couldÐ  ` Ðretain€jurisdiction€indefinitely€and€revoke€diversion€years€after€the€expiration€period,€provided€theÐ ü L  Ðinfraction€occurred€during€the€diversionary€period.€€However,€Tennessee€Code€Annotated€sectionÐ è 8  Ð40„35„313(a)(1)€provides€the€period€for€judicial€diversion€is€limited€to€a€specific€length€of€time€asÐ Ô$  Ðset€by€the€trial€court.€€More€importantly,€the€trial€court€ð ðòòshallóó€discharge€[the€defendant]€and€dismissÐ À  Ðthe€proceedingsðð€at€the€end€of€the€period€of€diversion€if€there€are€no€violations€of€probationÐ ¬ü  Ðconditions.€€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€40„35„313(a)(2)€(Supp.€2001)€(emphasis€added).€€The€dismissal€Ð ˜è  Ðrequirement€is€mandatory,€and€the€trial€court€is€without€any€discretion.€€In€our€view,€the€failure€of€Ð „Ô  Ða€defendant€to€file€a€formal€request€for€discharge€and€dismissal€does€not€give€the€trial€courtÐ pÀ Ðcontinuing€jurisdiction€òòad€infinitumóó.€€Ð \¬ ÐÌà  àIn€summary,€we€conclude€that€the€revocation€of€judicial€diversion€based€upon€violations€ofÐ 4„ Ðdiversionary€probation€conditions€is€guided€by€the€same€requirements€as€those€for€the€revocation€ofÐ  p Ðordinary€probation.€€The€revocation€must€be€initiated€during€the€diversionary€period€by€the€filing€ofÐ  \ Ða€revocation€warrant€or€by€the€proper€filing€of€the€state's€petition€to€revoke.€€Ð øH ÐÌà  àIn€the€instant€case,€the€probation€officer€relayed€the€probation€violation€reports€directly€to€theÐ Ð  Ðtrial€judge;€however,€the€reports€were€not€filed€with€the€clerk€nor€served€on€the€petitioner.€€NoÐ ¼  Ðrevocation€warrant€nor€petition€to€revoke€was€filed€before€the€term€of€judicial€diversion€expired.€Ð ¨ø ÐAbsent€such€a€filing,€the€trial€court€was€statutorily€required€to€discharge€the€petitioner€and€dismissÐ ”ä Ðthe€proceedings€at€the€end€of€the€period€of€diversion;€namely,€September€29,€2000.€€Therefore,€theÐ €Ð Ðtrial€court€was€without€jurisdiction€to€revoke€the€petitionerððs€diversion€or€sentence€her€when€itÐ l¼ Ðentered€judgment€on€November€3,€2000.€€Thus,€we€must€conclude€the€revocation€of€judicialÐ X ¨ Ðdiversion€and€the€resulting€sentence€are€void.€€The€petitioner€is€entitled€to€habeas€corpus€relief.€€Ð D!” ÐÌÌà@ff ìàò òIII.€DOUBLE€JEOPARDYó óˆÐ $X" ÐÌà  àThe€petitioner€further€argues€the€sentence€entered€by€the€trial€court€on€November€3,€2000,Ð à%0!$ Ðviolated€double€jeopardy€because€she€had€already€been€punished€under€the€conditions€of€herÐ Ì&"% Ðprobation€for€judicial€diversion.€€We€disagree€with€this€contention.€€Ð ¸'#& ÐÌà  àThe€judicial€diversion€probationary€period€is€not€a€sentence€nor€is€it€punishment.€€In€addition,Ð )à$( Ðthere€is€no€double€jeopardy€protection€against€revocation€of€probation€and€imposition€ofÐ |*Ì%) Ðimprisonment;€a€defendant€does€not€have€"the€right€to€know€at€any€specific€moment€in€time€what€theÐ h+¸&* Ðexact€limit€of€his€[or€her]€punishment€will€turn€out€to€be."€€òòUnited€States€v.€DiFrancescoóó,€449€U.S.Ð ° Ð117,€137,€101€S.€Ct.€426,€437,€66€L.€Ed.€2d€328€(1980);€òòseeóó€òòalsoóó€òòState€v.€Griffithóó,€787€S.W.2d€340,Ð œì Ð342€(Tenn.€1990)€(holding€that€resentencing€under€the€Community€Corrections€Act€to€a€sentenceÐ ˆØ Ðgreater€than€the€original€sentence€is€no€double€jeopardy€violation).€€Furthermore,€judicial€diversion€Ð tÄ Ðcan€only€be€imposed€with€the€defendantððs€consent.€€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€40„35„313(a)(1)(A)€(Supp.Ð `° Ð2001).€€Where€a€defendant€consents€to€the€largess€and€conditions€of€judicial€diversion,€there€is€noÐ L œ Ðdouble€jeopardy€violation€if€judicial€diversion€is€later€revoked€and€the€defendant€is€sentenced.€€Ð 8 ˆ ÐÌÌà@FF%ìàò òCONCLUSIONó óˆÐ ü L  ÐÌà  àWe€find€the€petitioner€is€entitled€to€habeas€corpus€relief.€€We€reverse€the€trial€courtððs€orderÐ Ô$  Ðand€remand€to€the€trial€court€for€the€entry€of€an€appropriate€order.€Ð À  Ðà  àÌÌÌà  àà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  à___________________________________€Ð pÀ Ðà  àà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  àJOE€G.€RILEY,€JUDGE