WPC 83qτz'GJ{φ$Dzi:)^l +q,N6a?Bſ&v "ci  wTL^tUb]I1k%]YW/}쁡qRClig@JCgII=c/.򻢵V=gnX"3qxQ ^tȎc0@k#W5y%. L^L]vL _**%3.-SI&s÷9'<|F:0K t9L93/\MtyOaU)X62CҜ^{i9$`}s:2 vgP+.DqV@k"/jWn9dT7mwaizi,+&&ςN*μyJ$ByBgc`oFs\$ٞuq^n2ϩ|thqCB6'b#\ %% UN+ 0y UN 0O ^ z,  wx 4|    g- mN 0 0DE 0 0 0= 0 0 0  1u 72b....................... 1e6666666666666 0 B 0 D5G D-| 0K ASG 0  0D AHP LaserJet 4000 Series PCL6V,,,,V0(9 Z6Times New Roman Regular(`$.8dd8    ("  Z6Times New Roman Regular*GG (_16   /%` ` hp x /23  Ԁ/%` ` hp x /   ȢS1  C:\PROGRA~1\COREL\WORDPE~1\TEMPLATE\CUSTOM~1\REVISE~1.WPTC:\Program Files\Corel\WordPerfect Office 2000\Template\Custom WP Templates\revised standard opinion.wpth_B03|xLevel 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5U*AA (_17  5+ ` hp x 523  Ԁ5+ ` hp x 5  (#$  0  *88 (_15  ," hp x ,23  Ԁ," hp x ,  *55 (_14 ` ) hp x )23  Ԁ) hp x ) ` *22 (_13  &hhp x &23  Ԁ&hhp x &  *// (_12  #p x #23  Ԁ#p x #  *,, (_11 h  p x 23  Ԁ p x h *)) (_10  pp x 23  Ԁpp x    ALDRIDGEHCkidnappingspousalaffirmanceWedemeyerPottsBomaractus reus rea3#37=CIQYag1.a.i.(1)(a)(i)1)a)i)- - 35;AGMSY_11.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.(|G2n#$ !.8qdd8         0   d(|3$ !.8qdd8     VVVV)!dxdx)!dxdx( $ Figure  1  ^_X`YE<<CLevel 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5(|3$ !.8qdd8     ($$   1  X[Z&OLE 2.0 Box <=8C HKKKK !.8qdd8     _   q8wXXdd8@hhjvqINTHECOURTOFCRIMINALAPPEALSOFTENNESSEE  @gg$ATNASHVILLE#qjv #Ԉ #   XwXq #qXXw#GARYE.ALDRIDGEv.STATEOFTENNESSEEXwXq  ? @@ AppealfromtheCircuitCourtforWayneCounty  9 @@No.13317JimT.Hamilton,Judge  # @@*AV) ` dE<` A   @@TTNo.M200300703CCAR3HCFiledOctober19,_2004_   AV) ` dE<]` A ^     #qXXwD#XwXqThismatterisbeforetheCourtupontheStatesmotiontoaffirmthejudgmentofthetrialcourtby V  memorandumopinionpursuanttoRule20,RulesoftheCourtofCriminalAppeals.Theappellant ? hasappealedthetrialcourtsordersummarilydismissingtheappellantspetitionforthewritof (x habeascorpus.Inthatpetitiontheappellantallegesthattheindictmentwhichformsthebasisofhis a convictionsforaggravatedkidnapping,threecountsofaggravatedrape,spousalrape,andtwo J countsofassault,isvoidbecausethecountsthereinfailtoallegesufficientfactstovestjurisdiction 3 intheconvictingcourt.Uponareviewoftherecordinthiscasewearepersuadedthatthetrialcourt  wascorrectinsummarilydismissingthehabeascorpuspetitionandthatthiscasemeetsthecriteria  foraffirmancepursuanttoRule20,RulesoftheCourtofCriminalAppeals.Accordingly,the  Statesmotionisgrantedandthejudgmentofthetrialcourtisaffirmed.     Tenn.R.App.P.3AppealasofRight;JudgmentoftheTrialCourtisAffirmed. Y  #qXw#XwX.q  JerryL.Smith,J.,deliveredtheopinionofthecourt,inwhichDavidH.Welles,andRobertW. ,| Wedemeyer,JJ.,joined. e GaryE.Aldridge,prose,Clifton,Tennessee.  7  PaulG.Summers,AttorneyGeneral&Reporter;MichaelMarkham,AssistantAttorneyGeneral, " " fortheappellee,StateofTennessee. ## #qXXw #XwXq   `     h #qXXw #s qX7 X s@! MEMORANDUMOPINION  m'"'   Awritofhabeascorpusisavailableonlywhenitappearsonthefaceofthejudgmentorthe A)$) recordthattheconvictingcourtwaswithoutjurisdictiontoconvictorsentencethedefendantorthat +c&+ thedefendantisstillimprisoneddespitetheexpirationofhissentence.Archerv.State,851S.W.2d ,5(- _157,164(Tenn.1993);Pottsv.State,833S.W.2d60,62(Tenn.1992).However,ifafterareview  ofthehabeaspetitionersfilingsthetrialcourtdeterminesthatthepetitionerwouldnotbeentitled  toreliefthenthepetitionmaybesummarilydismissed.Tenn.CodeAnn.2921109;Stateexrel. T Byrdv.Bomar,214Tenn.476,381S.W.2d280(Tenn.1964). & v   Avalidindictmentisessentialtovestjurisdictionintheconvictingcourt,andthereforean    indictmentthatissodefectivethatitfailstoinvestjurisdictionmaybechallengedinahabeascorpus   proceeding.Statev.Wyatt,24S.W.3d319,32023(Tenn.2000).Intheinstantcasetheindictment n  aboutwhichtheappellantcomplainsisattachedtothehabeascorpusproceedingsandisinthe @ recordonappeal.Eachcountthereinnamestheappellantastheaccused,thedateoftheoffense, b theactusreusandmensreaofeachoffense,andeachcountreferencesthestatutesdefiningthe 4 chargedoffenses.Giventhesecircumstances,itisclearthateachcountinthisindictmentis  sufficienttovestjurisdictionintheconvictingcourt.SeeStatev.Sledge,15S.W.3d93,95(Tenn.  2000);Statev.Carter,988S.W.2d145,148(Tenn.1999);Ruffv.State,978S.W.2d95,100(Tenn. Z 1998);Statev.Hill,854S.W.2d725,728(Tenn.1997).Thus,thetrialcourtwascorrectin ,| summarilydismissingtheappellantshabeascorpuspetition. N   Rule20,RulesoftheCourtofCriminalAppealsprovidesinteralia: #" 8  8`   TheCourt,withtheconcurrenceofalljudgesparticipatinginthe t% $ case,whenanopinionwouldhavenoprecedentialvalue,mayaffirm ]&!% thejudgmentoractionofthetrialcourtbymemorandumopinion F'"& ratherthanbyformalopinion,when:/(#'` x` x 8  8`   8 ` x` xThejudgmentisrenderedortheactionistakenina *Q%) proceedingbeforethetrialjudgewithoutajury,and *:&* suchjudgmentoractionisnotadeterminationof +#'+ guilt,andtheevidencedoesnotpreponderateagainst  thefindingofthetrialjudge...     Wefindthatthiscasemeetsthecriteriaoftheabovequotedruleandthereforewegrantthe T StatesmotionfiledunderRule20andweaffirmthejudgmentofthetrialcourt. x #XwX XX7U #X7 XXXw & v #XwX XX7#   `     h     ___________________________________      `     h     JERRYL.SMITH,JUDGE