ÿWPC| ÛM·™æ ¬þùýº§óûÿ¡˜ƒÇY¶@ÞêFN­~þèú¿¶ÌL‰ 68"5ûã §Óæ,•7rÀgäv)_ŒbŒÅˆ¬6cHî´$ä%Þ)sû[ÒæÇÔ3°~cPsJãÏÍ󣋚°Âä“+zb{v¾ÕÁà ð=-§knT|ý2U£›¿ŽÞš’”{˜f•uÆ^’@5gÕšvNå™]6™„¢ e{!/7Ö1âƒi‘J‡m¼eèÜ—øHBoôp;ã Zpñ+»ÿ§õ”öAóïaÏí¶Éoº¨›ñáÅ^‹RÃK–Ç8Rƒcje³=ÉÓ‰‹)ŸüËq¤­Éþ=ºÝ¨‘÷‰ ìîÕž©’’°?!'®‡ÜòË M„¦És`52¸OÉU}§YV¢Û#„è4ž5âª×Î( <Ü¢ü-Rôí`‹råñépA`¶VÏùŸ¼¬,È{YÚ7UûCš\}N9&ï®_[ÜÎFp$òaT£…*>ÓÌj6é)ƒÀö—´PBr÷Pó*ÜûJÔ»D)†œbÆHâz…|_"(wÎ6@:J‡ÇB.b» ×-2¢K4„e–õü*ì}:¥°Å}ˆ7NH¼B‰‹÷b#Á\ % UN# 0ˆq UNù ^ G wS zW ÒÑ 4£ · Æ mÈ Æß Æ¥ Æk Æ1÷Nÿ 0DEE*GGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGbqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqq 0ëyyyy Bdd 0¤ D3% D-X 0K…… ASÐÆ# 0¤é 0D A«Ñ˜HP LaserJet 4050ÈÈÈÈÈÈÈÈ0»(ÈhH  Z‹6Times New Roman Regular(`£ª$¡¡Ñ€.ÑÑ8€½­»»d»»d8ÑÑ ý ÑÓ  Ó(í€"  Z6Times New Roman Regularu3+â  ˜C:\PROGRA~1\COREL\WORDPE~1\TEMPLATE\CUSTOM~1\REVISE~1.WPTC:\Program Files\Corel\WordPerfect Office 2000\Template\Custom WP Templates\revised standard opinion.wptyG*Ф3|xÿU‹ÿÀÀÀLevel 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5‚Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5„Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5…Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5 (#Ã$òòÚ  Ú0Ú  Úóó Ý ƒR]$ÝÓ  Óà  àòòÚ  Ú1Ú  ÚóóÔ€ôüÍò»»ÔÝ  ÝÔ_ÔThe€order€of€incarceration€states€that€the€defendant€was€sentenced€to€six€weekends€in€jail€as€a€result€of€hisÐ ° Ðunscheduled€absences.€€However,€we€note€that,€at€the€revocation€hearing,€both€the€defendant€and€his€communityÐ tÄ Ðcorrections€supervisor€testified€that€the€six„weekend€jail€sentence€was€the€result€of€his€arrest€for€aggravated€assault€onÐ 8ˆ ÐAugust€6,€2000.- ù-(|G2]$¤¤Ý ƒ£ª!ÝÑ€.ÑÑ8€Yå»»dd8ÑÑ ý ÑÓ  ÓÝ  Ýà  àòòÚ  Ú0Ú  ÚóóÔ€ôüÍò»»Ô d(|3“$££Ý ƒ£ª!ÝÑ€.ÑÑ8€Yå»»dd8ÑÑ ý ÑÓ  ÓÝ  ÝVVVV'ÿÿdxd)!ÈÈÈÈdxdx( ±þ$’’ò òFigure€Ú  Ú1Ú  Úó ó^_X`YEþÿ<<CÿÿƒLevel 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5(|3“$¢¢Ý ƒ£ª!ÝÑ€.ÑÑ8€Yå»»dd8ÑÑ ý ÑÓ  ÓÝ  Ý($$””ò òÚ  Ú1Ú  Úó óX[Z&OLE 2.0 Box <=8ÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿCÿÿ HKKKKÝ ƒ£ª!ÝÑ€.ÑÑ8€Yå»»ddÈ8ÑÑ ý ÑÓ  ÓÝ  ÝÔ_ÔÑ  ÑÑ  ÑÔ€¼Yå»»»ÔÑ8€©XXdì»»d8Ñà@ttìàÔ‡îITYåÔIN€THE€COURT€OF€CRIMINAL€APPEALS€OF€TENNESSEEˆÐ ° Ðà@WW$ìàAT€KNOXVILLEÔ#†¼Yå»îîIT #ԈРÖ& ÐÓ  Óà @ àà @` àAssigned€on€Briefs€August€21,€2001Ð üL ÐÔ‡X©X»¼YåÔÌò òÔ#†¼Yå»XX© #ÔSTATE€OF€TENNESSEEòòóó€v.€SCOTT€RAY€ANDERSONòòóóÔ‡X©X»¼YåÔó óÐ úJ ÐÌà@@½½ìàò òDirect€Appeal€from€the€Circuit€Court€for€Ô_ÔBlountÔ_Ô€CountyÐ ú J Ðà@@øøìàNos.€C„11636,€37,€38€€€€€€D.€Kelly€Thomas,€Jr.,€JudgeÐ æ 6 ÐÌÌà@@ìì*ìàßA€V) °°` d€÷E<©` AßÐ ªú  ÐÌà@@TTìàNo.€E2000„03040„CCA„R3„CDÐ ¥õ  ÐSeptember€19,€Ô_Ô2001Ô_ÔÐ ‘á  ÐßA€V) °°` dE<|` AßÐ }Í  Ðó óÌÓ  ÓÔ‡X©XXX©ÔThe€defendant€appeals€the€judgment€entered€by€the€Circuit€Court€of€Ô_ÔBlountÔ_Ô€County€revoking€hisÐ xÈ  Ðcommunity€corrections€sentence.€€The€sole€issue€on€appeal€is€whether€the€court€abused€its€discretionÐ d´ Ðin€Ô#†¼Yå»XX©š#ÔÔ‡X©X»¼YåÔordering€the€defendant€to€serve€the€remainder€of€his€sentence€in€the€penitentiary.€After€carefulÐ P  Ðreview,€we€affirm€the€trial€courtððs€judgment.€Ô#†X©XXX©#ÔÔ#†¼Yå»XX©V#ÔÔ‡X©X»¼YåÔÐ <Œ ÐÓúÓÌò òTenn.€R.€App.€P.€3€Appeal€as€of€Right;€Judgment€of€the€Circuit€Court€Affirmedó óÐ d ÐÌòòÓ  ÓÔ#†¼Yå»àX©a#ÔÔ‡X©X.¼YåÔAlan€E.€Glenn,€J.óó,€delivered€the€opinion€of€the€court,€in€which€òòGary€R.€Wade,€Ô_ÔP.J.Ô_Ô,óó€and€òòJohnÐ ì< ÐEverett€Williams,€J.óó,€joined.Ð Ø( ÐÌSteve€Ô_ÔMcEwenÔ_Ô,€Mountain€City,€Tennessee€(on€appeal);€Raymond€Mack€Garner,€District€PublicÐ ° ÐDefender;€and€Shawn€G.€Graham,€Assistant€District€Public€Defender€(at€trial),€for€the€appellant,Ð œì ÐScott€Ray€Anderson.Ð ˆØ ÐÌPaul€G.€Summers,€Attorney€General€and€Reporter;€Peter€M.€Ô_ÔCoughlanÔ_Ô,€Assistant€Attorney€General;Ð `° ÐMichael€L.€Flynn,€District€Attorney€General;€and€William€R.€Reed,€Assistant€District€AttorneyÐ L œ ÐGeneral,€for€the€appellee,€State€of€Tennessee.Ð 8!ˆ  ÐÓÓÌà@@OO&ìàò òOPINIONó óÔ#†¼Yå»XX©A#ÔÔ‡X©X»¼YåÔÐ #`" ÐòòóóÔ#†¼Yå»XX©ù #ÔÓ  ÓÔ€X©X»¼YåÔÔ‡X©XXX©ÔÌòòò òÓ  ÓDISCUSSIONó óóóÐ è$8 $ ÐÓ§ Óòòóóà  àThe€defendant,€Scott€Ray€Anderson,€pled€guilty€to€three€charges€of€theft€of€property€overÐ Ô%$!% Ð$1000,€a€Class€D€felony.€€On€September€27,€1999,€the€trial€court€imposed€an€effective€sentence€ofÐ À&"& Ðten€years,€with€168€days€to€be€served€in€local€confinement€and€the€balance€in€community€corrections.€Ð ¬'ü"' ÐAfter€an€eligibility€report€was€filed€with€the€court,€the€defendant€was€released€periodically€under€theÐ ˜(è#( Ðsupervision€of€the€Community€Corrections€Program€to€attend€scheduled€Alcoholics€AnonymousÐ „)Ô$) Ðmeetings€and€anger€management€classes.€€The€defendant€was€released€from€jail€on€April€25,€2000,Ð p*À%* Ðand€was€then€placed€€in€the€Ô_ÔETHRAÔ_Ô€Community€Corrections€Program€to€serve€the€remainder€of€hisÐ \+¬&+ Ðsentence.€Ð H,˜', ÐÐ 4-„(-ý ÐÔ_Ôà  àOn€August€15,€2000,€the€trial€court€entered€an€order€of€incarceration€ordering€the€defendantÐ ° Ðto€serve€six€weekends€in€jail€as€a€result€of€three€unexcused€absences€from€his€day€treatmentÐ œì Ðprogram.׃×Ý ƒ#ÃÝòòÚ  Ú1Ú  ÚóóÝ  Ý×  ×€€In€the€revocation€warrant€filed€on€October€6,€2000,€the€State€alleged€that€the€defendantÐ ˆØ Ðhad€violated€the€terms€of€his€community€corrections€sentence€by:€€(1)€being€arrested€for€aggravatedÐ tÄ Ðassault€on€August€6,€2000;€(2)€failing€to€complete€the€six€weekends€in€jail€as€ordered€by€the€trialÐ `° Ðcourt€on€August€15,€2000;€(3)€failing€to€maintain€employment;€(4)€failing€to€pay€court€costs;€(5)Ð L œ Ðfailing€to€pay€any€supervision€fees;€and€(6)€failing€to€report€to€scheduled€group€meetings€sinceÐ 8 ˆ ÐSeptember€26,€2000.€€The€defendant€was€arrested,€and€a€hearing€was€held€on€November€27,€2000,Ð $ t Ðto€determine€whether€his€community€corrections€sentence€should€be€revoked.€€Ð  ` Ðà  àÌà  àPat€Ballard,€the€defendantððs€community€corrections€supervisor,€òòò òóóó ótestified€that€the€defendantÐ è 8  Ðhad€been€under€her€supervision€while€in€jail€on€furloughs€and€for€four€months€after€his€release€fromÐ Ô$  Ðjail€on€April€25,€2000.€€She€indicated€that€the€defendant€had€initially€made€significant€progress€in€theÐ À  Ðprogram,€but€she€began€seeing€a€change€in€late€July.€€By€late€September,€he€had€stopped€coming€toÐ ¬ü  Ðhis€group€meetings,€and€the€last€time€he€had€reported€to€her€was€on€September€26,€2000.€€TheÐ ˜è  Ðdefendant€failed€to€provide€her€with€any€employment€records€after€July€22,€and€had€not€paid€anyÐ „Ô  Ðcourt€costs€or€supervision€fees.€€Furthermore,€she€stated€that,€because€of€his€new€arrest€for€Ð pÀ Ðaggravated€assault€on€August€6,€2000,€he€had€been€ordered€to€serve€six€weekends€in€jail.€€She€couldÐ \¬ Ðnot€recall€how€many€weekends€the€defendant€had€actually€served€but€stated€that€he€had€not€servedÐ H˜ Ðall€of€them.€€She€told€the€court€that€the€defendantððs€ð ðrelapseðð€was€the€result€of€his€addiction€toÐ 4„ Ðð ðhuffingðð€paint€and€his€lack€of€focus€on€sobriety.€€She€believed,€however,€that€he€was€still€a€goodÐ  p Ðcandidate€for€rehabilitation€and€recommended€that€he€be€placed€in€a€different€treatment€programÐ  \ Ðwhile€incarcerated€for€six€months€and€then€be€placed€in€a€structured€halfway€house.Ð øH ÐÌà  àThe€defendant€also€testified€on€his€behalf€at€the€revocation€hearing.€€He€admitted€that€Ms.Ð Ð  ÐBallardððs€allegations€were€truthful,€that€he€had€been€on€probation€several€times€in€the€past,€and€thatÐ ¼  Ðhis€prior€probation€had€been€revoked€for€failure€to€attend€his€treatment€meetings.€ò òòòóóó ó€He€admittedÐ ¨ø Ðhaving€a€substance€abuse€problem€and€claimed€that€he€needed€ð ðmore€structured€help.ðð€€However,Ð ”ä Ðhe€recognized€that€his€prior€attempts€at€rehabilitation€had€failed.€€When€testifying€as€to€the€chargesÐ €Ð Ðbrought€against€him€for€aggravated€assault,€he€explained€that€because€the€charges€had€beenÐ l¼ Ðdismissed,€he€had€assumed€that€he€did€not€have€to€report€to€jail€after€his€third€weekend.€€He€couldÐ X ¨ Ðnot€explain€why€he€had€stopped€going€to€his€counseling€meetings,€other€than€to€say€that€he€hadÐ D!” Ðstarted€ð ðhuffingðð€paint€again€and€could€not€control€his€addiction.€€As€for€not€paying€his€fees€andÐ 0"€  Ðcosts,€the€defendant€said€that€he€had€fallen€behind€on€paying€his€debts€while€he€was€incarcerated€and,Ð #l! Ðlater,€after€he€was€working,€he€returned€to€using€addictive€substances€ð ðand€just€never€paid.ððò òòòÐ $X" ÐÌà  àóóó óAt€the€conclusion€of€the€hearing,€the€trial€court€revoked€the€defendantððs€conditional€€sentence,Ð à%0!$ Ðfinding€that€his€violations€were€significant.€€The€court€also€found€that€the€defendant€had€ð ðdroppedÐ Ì&"% Ðout€and€relapsed€and€use[d]€controlled€ð!ð€illegal€substances€while€on€Community€Corrections.ðð€€TheÐ ° Ðcourt€stated:€€ð ðThere€just€comes€a€point€when€too€much€is€too€much.€€And€thereððs€a€good€argumentÐ œì Ðtoday€that€that€point€came€a€long€time€ago,€but€it€has€definitively€come€now,€if€it€hadnððt€come€a€longÐ ˆØ Ðtime€ago.ðð€€The€court€then€ordered€the€defendant€to€serve€his€original€jail€sentence€in€confinementÐ tÄ Ðless€time€already€served.€€€à  àà h à€€€€€€€Ð `° Ðà  àÌà  àò òòòà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àANALYSISó óóóÐ 8 ˆ ÐÌà  àThe€defendant€argues€that€the€trial€court€abused€its€discretion€in€revoking€his€communityÐ  ` Ðcorrections€sentence.€€He€further€contends€that€the€court€erred€in€not€following€the€recommendationsÐ ü L  Ðof€his€community€corrections€supervisor,€given€Ms.€Ballardððs€experience€and€confidence€in€hisÐ è 8  Ðchances€for€success.€€In€light€of€the€evidence€presented,€we€find€this€argument€without€merit.€€Ð Ô$  ÐÌà  àThe€primary€purpose€of€the€Community€Corrections€Act€of€1985€is€to€ð ð[e]stablish€a€policyÐ ¬ü  Ðwithin€the€state€to€punish€selected,€nonviolent€felony€offenders€in€front„end€community€basedÐ ˜è  Ðalternatives€to€incarceration,€thereby€reserving€secure€confinement€facilities€for€violent€felonyÐ „Ô  Ðoffenders[.]ðð€€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€40„36„103(1)€(1997).€€The€program€offers€a€flexible€alternativeÐ pÀ Ðbeneficial€to€both€the€defendant€and€society.€€òòState€v.€Griffithóó,€787€S.W.2d€340,€342€(Tenn.€1990).€Ð \¬ ÐÌà  àOnce€the€defendant€violates€the€terms€of€his€community€corrections€sentence,€the€trial€courtÐ 4„ Ðmay€revoke€the€sentence€and€impose€a€new€one.€€Tennessee€Code€Annotated€Section€40„36„106(e)(4)Ð  p Ðgrants€the€trial€court€the€authority€to€resentence€a€defendant€following€the€revocation€of€the€originalÐ  \ Ðsentence.€€The€court€ð ðmay€resentence€the€defendant€to€any€appropriate€sentencing€alternative,Ð øH Ðincluding€incarceration,€for€any€period€of€time€up€to€the€maximum€sentence€provided€for€the€offenseÐ ä4 Ðcommitted,€less€any€time€actually€served€in€any€community„based€alternative€to€incarceration.ðð€Ð Ð  ÐTenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€40„36„106(e)(4)€(Supp.€2000).Ð ¼  ÐÌà  àRevocation€of€a€community€corrections€sentence€occurs€upon€finding€by€a€preponderance€ofÐ ”ä Ðthe€evidence€that€the€defendant€has€violated€the€conditions€of€the€agreement.€€òòState€v.€Harkinsóó,€811Ð €Ð ÐS.W.2d€79,€82€(Tenn.€1991).€€ð ðThe€judgment€of€a€trial€court€in€this€regard€will€not€be€disturbed€onÐ l¼ Ðappeal€unless€it€appears€that€there€has€been€an€abuse€of€discretion.ðð€€òòId.óó€€For€a€reviewing€court€to€findÐ X ¨ Ðan€abuse€of€discretion,€it€must€be€shown€that€the€record€contains€no€substantial€evidence€to€supportÐ D!” Ðthe€trial€judgeððs€conclusion.€€òòId.óó€€Ð 0"€  Ðà  àà ` àÌà  àAs€the€record€clearly€shows,€the€defendant€had€been€before€the€trial€court€on€many€occasionsÐ $X" Ðsince€his€substance€abuse€and€other€problems€began€at€age€fifteen.€€The€judge€himself€recalledÐ ô$D # Ðordering€sentences€more€lenient€than€what€the€State€had€recommended€when€the€defendant€hadÐ à%0!$ Ðappeared€before€him.€€On€cross„examination,€the€defendant€acknowledged€that€he€had€spent€mostÐ Ì&"% Ðof€his€adult€life€in€custody.€€He€also€admitted€that€previous€probations€had€been€revoked€for€failureÐ ¸'#& Ðto€comply€with€the€terms€of€his€sentences.€€While€acknowledging€that€he€had€an€uncontrollable€drugÐ ¤(ô#' Ðaddiction€and€needed€help,€the€defendant€admitted€to€not€following€his€treatment€plans.€€Perhaps,€theÐ )à$( Ðâ âmost€significant€testimony€in€this€regard€came€from€the€defendantððs€community€correctionsÐ |*Ì%) Ðsupervisor€who€testified€that€he€had€made€progress€in€the€program€at€first€but€then€lost€his€focus€onÐ ° Ðsobriety€and€stopped€attending€his€scheduled€meetings.Ð œì Ðâ âÌà  àThe€evidence€presented€and€the€defendantððs€own€admissions€demonstrate€his€constantÐ tÄ Ðdisregard€for€the€leniency€of€the€court.€€The€record€firmly€supports€the€courtððs€determination€that€theÐ `° Ðdefendant€failed€to€comply€with€the€terms€of€his€community€corrections€sentence.Ð L œ Ðà  àà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h à€€€à À àà  àà p àÐ 8 ˆ Ðà  àà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h à€òòò òCONCLUSIONó óóóÐ $ t ÐÌà  àWe€conclude€that€the€court€did€not€abuse€its€discretion€in€revoking€the€defendantððsÐ  P  Ðcommunity€corrections€placement€and€ordering€him€to€serve€the€remainder€of€his€sentence€inÐ ì <  Ðconfinement.€€Accordingly,€we€affirm€the€judgment€of€the€trial€court.€€Ð Ø(  ÐÔ#†X©XXX© #ÔÌÌÌà  àà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  à___________________________________€Ð ˆØ  Ðà  àà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  àALAN€E.€GLENN,€JUDGE