ÿWPCN 8\Ѻ99Yå}“t'•`˜nXùñ@gˆÑ£j¶æÒ·™lEð¦4û‰ï»±À©z¯"Ðæ„ÿ?Øž~“é]è~±˜­'"?ûŒÕ‘²ÝX¢·€†cš vÉ¢¹ãEÿÔ=…Ù”¬<Wi‰¥X>v(•ä#+LÏÅüzo°ÿ4Ö‚íúK‚ƒÃ»»¾.ˆ¦ ÓA]Uƒ] æJÛÚÇ`<Ÿ´]ž¥jÈá8ʵÛFEì6ü ×ɼjf>¡,‹î—µ{jØÛ† ݤÅqå²ÂÞOËœÇiuÞÏÜkÐE`ôšè¼Õp£[C!šc{²¼W;i@R¶ÄéA׃±¿PZ|V¨ß-zÅàû<"ŠCžÕªÿË$mÕüy.Ý$Ô>“7Hx($†h*•Å5.ÿ9ÁLL¬ÇøVmOðµ!¾ÁÕ>%1è–þ6b{ ì5Þ–0–ån°R*×F+d/˜ƒòt”qüTz'û~È;6ù®åÁ5>ÏV_=_à¬æÞ³Å8ÈܸåDfõzIºý†ƒ¶[d,€Ž:Èá€Ù1èTÏ¢ä•Ê‘If3RK/ Ä~XkÌ™xÖOãäåÒìÎýÛ|oâÿ|¸…õæhXÙa©ýïab %\UNb 0ˆ°UN8U@†^ ÆwÒ zÖÒP 4" 6 E mG Æ^ Æ$ Æê ư #Áv N799EAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAbCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCC 0ëKKKK B66 0¤S D3÷ D-* 0KWW AS¢Æõ 0¤» 0D_ A«£»(ÖÃ9 Z‹6Times New Roman Regular(`£ª$¡¡Ñ€.ÑÑ8€½­»»d»»d8ÑÑ ý ÑÓ  Ó(í€"  Z6Times New Roman Regular(ƒð Z‹(Times New Roman ,ª…+  ˜C:\PROGRA~1\COREL\WORDPE~1\TEMPLATE\CUSTOM~1\REVISE~1.WPTC:\Program Files\Corel\WordPerfect Office 2000\Template\Custom WP Templates\revised standard opinion.wptÖJ~')º   3|xÿU‹ÿÀÀÀLevel 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5‚Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5„Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5…Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5˜HP LaserJet 4000 Series PCL 6ÈÈ,,,,ÈÈ0 - ù-(|G2év$¤¤Ý ƒ£ª!ÝÑ€.ÑÑ8€%»»dd8ÑÑ ý ÑÓ  ÓÝ  Ýà  àòòÚ  Ú0Ú  ÚóóÔ€ô´Mò»»Ô d(|3?f$££Ý ƒ£ª!ÝÑ€.ÑÑ8€%»»dd8ÑÑ ý ÑÓ  ÓÝ  ÝVVVV'ÿÿdxd)!ÈÈÈÈdxdx( ±þ$’’ò òFigure€Ú  Ú1Ú  Úó ó^_X`YEþÿ<<CÿÿƒLevel 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5(|3?f$¢¢Ý ƒ£ª!ÝÑ€.ÑÑ8€%»»dd8ÑÑ ý ÑÓ  ÓÝ  Ý($$””ò òÚ  Ú1Ú  Úó óX[Z&OLE 2.0 Box <=8ÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿCÿÿ HKKKKÝ ƒ£ª!ÝÑ€.ÑÑ8€%»»ddÈ8ÑÑ ý ÑÓ  ÓÝ  ÝÔ_ÔÑ  ÑÑ  ÑÔ€¼%»»»ÔÑ8€Q9XXdì»»d8Ñà@ttìàÔ‡îd%ÔIN€THE€COURT€OF€CRIMINAL€APPEALS€OF€TENNESSEEˆÐ ° Ðà@kk$ìàAT€NASHVILLEÔ#†¼%»îîd #ԈРÖ& ÐÓ  Óà @ àà @` àOctober€16,€2001€SessionÐ üL ÐÔ‡XQ9X»¼%ÔÌò òÔ#†¼%»XXQ9#ÔSTATE€OF€TENNESSEE€v.€MICHAEL€JOSEPH€Ô_ÔARBUCKLEÔ_ÔÔ‡XQ9X»¼%Ôó óÐ úJ ÐÌà@@½½ìàò ò€Appeal€from€the€Criminal€Court€for€Sumner€CountyÐ ú J Ðà@@øøìàNo.€325„1999€€€€€€Jane€Ô_ÔWheatcraftÔ_Ô,€JudgeÐ æ 6 ÐÌÌà@@ìì*ìàßA€V) °°` d€÷E<©` AßÐ ªú  ÐÌà@@TTìàNo.€M2000„02885„CCA„R3„CD€„€Filed€December€5,€Ô_Ô2001Ô_ÔÐ ¥õ  ÐÌßA€V) °°` dE<|` AßÐ }Í  Ðó óÌÓ  ÓÔ‡XQ9XXXQ9ÔA€Sumner€County€jury€convicted€the€Defendant,€Michael€Joseph€Arbuckle,€of€one€count€of€drivingÐ xÈ  Ðunder€the€influence,€one€count€of€driving€under€the€influence,€per€se,€and€one€count€of€driving€underÐ d´ Ðthe€influence,€second€offense.€€Following€a€sentencing€hearing,€the€trial€court€merged€the€convictionsÐ P  Ðand€sentenced€the€Defendant€to€eleven€months€and€twenty„nine€days,€with€all€but€sixty€daysÐ <Œ Ðsuspended.€€In€this€appeal,€the€Defendant€contends€that€the€trial€court€erred€in€(1)€denying€his€motionÐ (x Ðto€suppress€the€results€of€a€blood€alcohol€test,€(2)€admitting€the€blood€alcohol€test€results€despiteÐ d Ðincomplete€evidence€of€the€chain€of€custody,€(3)€admitting€the€blood€alcohol€test€results€despite€aÐ P Ðlack€of€relevance,€and€(4)€finding€that€sufficient€evidence€existed€for€a€reasonable€jury€to€find€theÐ ì< ÐDefendant€guilty.€€We€affirm€the€judgment€of€the€trial€court.Ð Ø( ÐÔ#†XQ9XXXQ9ö#ÔÔ#†¼%»XXQ9©#ÔÔ‡XQ9X»¼%ÔÓêÓÌò òTenn.€R.€App.€P.€3€Appeal€as€of€Right;€Judgment€of€the€Criminal€Court€Affirmedó óÐ ° ÐÌòòÓ  ÓÔ#†¼%»àXQ9l #ÔÔ‡XQ9X.¼%ÔDavid€H.€Welles,€J.óó,€delivered€the€opinion€of€the€court,€in€which€òòJoseph€M.€Ô_ÔTiptonÔ_Ôóó€and€òòJerry€L.Ð ˆØ ÐSmith,€JJ.óó,€joined.Ð tÄ ÐÌMark€C.€Ô_ÔScruggsÔ_Ô,€Nashville,€Tennessee,€for€the€appellant,€Michael€Joseph€Ô_ÔArbuckleÔ_Ô.Ð L œ ÐÌPaul€G.€Summers,€Attorney€General€and€Reporter;€Thomas€E.€Williams,€III,€Assistant€AttorneyÐ $"t! ÐGeneral;€Lawrence€Ray€Whitley,€District€Attorney€General;€and€Ô_ÔLytleÔ_Ô€Anthony€James,€AssistantÐ #`" ÐDistrict€Attorney€General,€for€the€appellee,€State€of€Tennessee.Ð ü#L# ÐÓ ÓÌà@@OO&ìàò òOPINIONó óÔ#†¼%»XXQ98 #ÔòòóóÔ‡XQ9X»¼%ÔÐ Ô%$!% ÐÓ  ÓÓÓÔ#†¼%»XXQ9z #ÔÔ€XQ9X»¼%ÔòòÔ‡XQ9XXXQ9ÔóóÌÔ#†XQ9XXXQ9#ÔÔ‡XQ9XXXQ9ÔÓÓà  àAt€3:30€a.m.€on€December€15,€1998,€Sumner€County€Sheriffððs€Deputies€Tully€Birdwell€andÐ ˜(è#( ÐAaron€Pickard€noticed€a€broken€tail€light€on€a€car€driven€by€the€Defendant,€Michael€JosephÐ „)Ô$) ÐArbuckle.€€The€officers€initiated€a€traffic€stop€in€order€to€inform€the€Defendant€of€his€broken€tailÐ p*À%* Ðlight.€€After€approaching€the€vehicle,€the€officers€noticed€that€the€Defendant€was€slurring€his€speechÐ \+¬&+ Ðand€smelled€strongly€of€alcohol.€€The€Defendant€stated€that€he€had€one€beer€approximately€an€hourÐ H,˜', Ðbefore€the€officers€stopped€him.€€Deputy€Birdwell€asked€the€Defendant€to€exit€the€car€in€order€toÐ 4-„(-ý÷ Ðperform€field€sobriety€tests.€€After€the€tests,€Deputy€Birdwell€and€Deputy€Pickard€concluded€that€theÐ ° ÐDefendant€was€intoxicated€and€placed€him€under€arrest€for€driving€under€the€influence.Ð œì ÐÌà  àThe€Defendant€agreed€to€take€a€blood€alcohol€test,€which€was€administered€at€SumnerÐ tÄ ÐRegional€Medical€Center€approximately€one€hour€and€fifteen€minutes€after€the€initial€traffic€stop.€Ð `° ÐThe€test€revealed€a€blood€alcohol€content€of€.14%.Ð L œ ÐÌò òÓ  ÓREASONABLE€GROUNDSó óÐ $ t ÐÓrÓà  àFirst,€the€Defendant€contends€that€the€trial€court€erred€in€denying€his€motion€to€suppressÐ  ` Ðbecause€the€officers€did€not€have€reasonable€grounds€to€believe€that€the€Defendant€was€driving€underÐ ü L  Ðthe€influence;€therefore,€the€officers€were€precluded€from€requesting€that€he€take€a€blood€alcohol€test.€Ð è 8  ÐDue€to€the€Defendantððs€failure€to€provide€an€adequate€record€for€our€review€of€this€issue,€we€mustÐ Ô$  Ðaffirm€the€ruling€of€the€trial€court.Ð À  ÐÌà  àWhen€a€party€seeks€appellate€review€there€is€a€duty€to€prepare€a€record€which€conveys€a€fair,Ð ˜è  Ðaccurate€and€complete€account€of€what€transpired€with€respect€to€the€issues€forming€the€basis€of€theÐ „Ô  Ðappeal.€€òòSeeóó€òòState€v.€Bunchóó,€646€S.W.2d€158,€160€(Tenn.€1983);€òòState€v.€Ballardóó,€855€S.W.2d€557,Ð pÀ Ð561€(Tenn.€1993)€(holding€failure€to€include€transcript€precludes€appellate€review);€òòState€v.€Oodyóó,Ð \¬ Ð823€S.W.2d€554,€559€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.€1991)€(holding€trial€court's€ruling€presumed€correct€in€theÐ H˜ Ðabsence€of€an€adequate€record€on€appeal).€€Where€the€record€is€incomplete€and€does€not€contain€aÐ 4„ Ðtranscript€of€the€proceedings€relevant€to€an€issue€presented€for€review,€or€portions€of€the€record€uponÐ  p Ðwhich€the€party€relies,€an€appellate€court€is€precluded€from€considering€the€issue.€€òòSeeóó€€òòState€v.Ð  \ ÐRobertsóó,€755€S.W.2d€833,€836€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.€1988).€€Absent€the€necessary€relevant€material€inÐ øH Ðthe€record€an€appellate€court€cannot€consider€the€merits€of€an€issue.€€òòSeeóó€Tenn.€Ô_ÔR.Ô_Ô€App.€P.€24(b).Ð ä4 ÐÌà  àIn€the€present€case,€the€trial€courtððs€Order€Denying€the€Motion€to€Suppress€clearlyÐ ¼  Ðincorporates€the€findings€made€on€the€record€during€the€hearing€on€the€motion.€€However,€theÐ ¨ø ÐDefendant€has€failed€to€provide€these€findings€for€our€review.€€Curiously,€the€Defendant€has€providedÐ ”ä Ðonly€the€testimony€of€Deputy€Birdwell€in€the€transcript€of€the€hearing€contained€in€the€record.€€TheÐ €Ð Ðtranscript€is€referred€to€as€"Excerpt€From€the€Transcript€of€the€Proceedings,"€and€includes€only€the€Ð l¼ Ðtestimony€of€Deputy€Birdwell.Ð X ¨ ÐÌà  àRegardless€of€the€reason€for€the€apparent€omission,€without€a€proper€record€for€our€review,Ð 0"€  Ðwe€must€presume€that€the€findings€of€the€trial€court€are€correct.€€òòSeeóó€òòOodyóó,€823€S.W.2d€at€559.€Ð #l! ÐHowever,€even€a€cursory€review€of€the€incomplete€record€before€us€reveals€that€Deputy€BirdwellÐ $X" Ðdetected€a€strong€odor€of€alcohol,€slurred€speech,€and€confusion€on€the€part€of€the€Defendant€afterÐ ô$D # Ðinitiating€a€traffic€stop.€€During€the€trial€of€this€matter€the€State€presented€the€testimony€of€DeputyÐ à%0!$ ÐPickard€who,€through€his€observations€of€the€Defendant€during€the€traffic€stop,€also€concluded€thatÐ Ì&"% Ðthe€Defendant€was€intoxicated.€€When€reviewing€a€trial€court's€ruling€on€a€motion€to€suppress,€anÐ ¸'#& Ðappellate€court€may€also€consider€the€evidence€presented€during€the€subsequent€trial.€€òòSeeóó€€òòState€v.Ð ¤(ô#' ÐHenningóó,€975€S.W.2d€290,€299€(Tenn.€1998);€òòState€v.€Johnsonóó,€988€S.W.2d€414,€421€(Tenn.€Crim.Ð )à$( ÐApp.€1998).Ð |*Ì%) ЀÐ h+¸&* Ðà  àThe€Defendant€has€failed€to€properly€preserve€this€issue€for€appeal,€and€we€must€thereforeÐ ° Ðaffirm€the€ruling€of€the€trial€court.Ð œì ÐÌò òÓ  ÓCHAIN€OF€CUSTODYó óÐ tÄ ÐÓž"Óà  àNext,€the€Defendant€contends€that€the€trial€court€improperly€admitted€the€results€of€the€bloodÐ `° Ðalcohol€test€despite€the€incomplete€chain€of€custody€of€the€blood€sample.€€The€Defendant€asserts€thatÐ L œ Ðthe€blood€sampleððs€chain€of€custody€was€incomplete€without€the€testimony€of€the€hospital€employeeÐ 8 ˆ Ðwho€drew€the€blood€from€the€Defendant€and€the€Tennessee€Bureau€of€Investigation€employee€whoÐ $ t Ðreceived€the€sample€at€the€T.B.I.€crime€laboratory.Ð  ` ÐÌà  à€It€is€well-established€that€as€a€condition€precedent€to€the€introduction€of€tangible€evidence,Ð è 8  Ða€witness€must€be€able€to€identify€the€evidence€or€establish€an€unbroken€chain€of€custody.€€òòSeeóó€€òòStateÐ Ô$  Ðv.€Goodmanóó,€643€S.W.2d€375,€381€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.€1982).€€However,€the€failure€to€call€all€of€theÐ À  Ðwitnesses€who€handled€the€evidence€does€not€necessarily€preclude€its€admission€into€evidence.€€òòSeeóóÐ ¬ü  ÐòòState€v.€Johnsonóó,€673€S.W.2d€877,€881€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.€1984).€€While€the€State€is€not€required€toÐ ˜è  Ðestablish€facts€which€exclude€every€possibility€of€tampering,€the€circumstances€established€mustÐ „Ô  Ðreasonably€assure€the€identity€of€the€evidence€and€its€integrity.€€òòSeeóó€òòState€v.€Fergusonóó,€741€S.W.2dÐ pÀ Ð125,€127€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.€1987).€€This€issue€addresses€itself€to€the€sound€discretion€of€the€trialÐ \¬ Ðcourt,€and€the€court's€determination€will€not€be€disturbed€in€the€absence€of€a€clearly€mistakenÐ H˜ Ðexercise€of€such€discretion.€€òòSeeóó€òòState€v.€Beechóó,€744€S.W.2d€585,€587€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.€1987).Ð 4„ ÐÌà  àDeputy€Birdwell€testified€that€he€observed€the€Defendantððs€blood€being€drawn€by€a€hospitalÐ  \ Ðattendant,€took€the€sample€from€the€attendant,€and€sealed€the€sample€in€a€protective€box.€€DeputyÐ øH ÐBirdwell€then€placed€the€box€in€the€Police€Departmentððs€evidence€locker€to€be€mailed€to€the€T.B.I.Ð ä4 Ðcrime€laboratory.€€Deputy€Pickard€also€testified€that€he€was€present€when€the€Defendant's€blood€wasÐ Ð  Ðdrawn,€and€he€observed€Deputy€Birdwell€place€the€blood€sample€in€a€protective€box€and€seal€the€box.€Ð ¼  ÐAgent€Harrison€of€the€T.B.I.€testified€regarding€the€procedure€for€receiving€and€documenting€bloodÐ ¨ø Ðsamples€and€€stated€that€any€irregularities€in€the€shipping€or€receiving€of€the€sample€would€have€beenÐ ”ä Ðnoted€on€the€Request€Form€and€Alcohol€Report€that€was€admitted€into€evidence.€€There€is€noÐ €Ð Ðevidence€of€tampering,€loss,€substitution,€mistake,€or€any€other€irregularities€concerning€theÐ l¼ ÐDefendantððs€blood€sample.Ð X ¨ ÐÌà  àThe€trial€court€did€not€err€or€abuse€its€discretion€in€admitting€the€results€of€the€blood€sampleÐ 0"€  Ðbecause€the€State€established€the€identity€and€integrity€of€the€evidence€through€a€sufficient€chain€ofÐ #l! Ðcustody.€€This€issue€is€without€merit.Ð $X" ÐÌò òÓ  ÓRELEVANCY€OF€BLOOD€ALCOHOL€TEST€RESULTSó óÐ à%0!$ ÐÓ‹/Óà  àThe€Defendant€also€challenges€the€relevancy€of€the€blood€alcohol€test€results.€€The€DefendantÐ Ì&"% Ðasserts€that€because€the€blood€was€drawn€more€than€an€hour€after€the€Defendant€was€stopped€byÐ ¸'#& Ðpolice,€the€alcohol€content€of€his€blood€at€the€time€the€blood€was€drawn€has€no€relevance€inÐ ¤(ô#' Ðconsidering€whether€he€was€intoxicated€at€the€time€of€the€traffic€stop.€€The€Defendant€contends€thatÐ )à$( Ðthe€State€is€required€to€produce€evidence€that€would€show€that,€at€the€time€the€Defendant€was€drivingÐ |*Ì%) Ðhis€car,€he€was€under€the€influence€of€alcohol€or€had€a€blood€alcohol€content€of€above€.10%.Ð h+¸&* Їà  àThe€Defendant€did€not€contest€the€relevance€of€the€blood€alcohol€test€during€his€trial.€€TheÐ ° Ðfailure€to€take€available€action€to€prevent€or€nullify€an€alleged€error€waives€the€issue.€€òòSeeóó€Tenn.€R.Ð œì ÐApp.€P.€36(a).€€Thus,€by€failing€to€make€a€contemporaneous€objection€to€the€relevancy€of€the€bloodÐ ˆØ Ðalcohol€test€results,€the€Defendant€waived€the€issue.€€òòSeeóó€Tenn.€R.€Ô_ÔEvidÔ_Ô.€103(a)(1);€òòState€v.€Ô_ÔRhodenÔ_Ôóó,Ð tÄ Ð739€S.W.2d€6,€11€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.€1987).Ð `° ÐÌò òÓ  ÓSUFFICIENCYó óÐ 8 ˆ ÐÓ*5ÓÔ#†XQ9XXXQ9W#ÔÔ‡XQ9XXXQ9Ôà  àFinally,€the€Defendant€contends€that€the€evidence€presented€by€the€State€at€trial€wasÐ $ t Ðinsufficient€to€support€a€finding€of€guilt€beyond€a€reasonable€doubt.€€We€must€respectfully€disagreeÐ  ` Ðand€affirm€the€judgment€of€the€trial€court.Ð ü L  ÐÌà  àTennessee€Rule€of€Appellate€Procedure€13(e)€prescribes€that€ð ð[f]indings€of€guilt€in€criminalÐ Ô$  Ðactions€whether€by€the€trial€court€or€jury€shall€be€set€aside€if€the€evidence€is€insufficient€to€supportÐ À  Ðthe€findings€by€the€trier€of€fact€of€guilt€beyond€a€reasonable€doubt.ðð€€Evidence€is€sufficient€if,€afterÐ ¬ü  Ðreviewing€the€evidence€in€the€light€most€favorable€to€the€prosecution,€any€rational€trier€of€fact€couldÐ ˜è  Ðhave€found€the€essential€elements€of€the€crime€beyond€a€reasonable€doubt.€€òòSeeóó€òòJackson€v.€Virginiaóó,Ð „Ô  Ð443€U.S.€307,€319€(1979);€òòState€v.€Smithóó,€24€S.W.3d€274,€278€(Tenn.€2000).€€In€addition,€becauseÐ pÀ Ðconviction€by€a€trier€of€fact€destroys€the€presumption€of€innocence€and€imposes€a€presumption€ofÐ \¬ Ðguilt,€a€convicted€criminal€defendant€bears€the€burden€of€showing€that€the€evidence€was€insufficient.€Ð H˜ ÐòòSeeóó€òòMcBee€v.€Stateóó,€372€S.W.2d€173,€176€(Tenn.€1963);€òòsee€alsoóó€òòState€v.€Buggsóó,€995€S.W.2d€102,Ð 4„ Ð105„06€(Tenn.€1999);€òòState€v.€Evansóó,€838€S.W.2d€185,€191€(Tenn.€1992);òòóó€òòState€v.€Tuggleóó,€639Ð  p ÐS.W.2d€913,€914€(Tenn.€1982).òòóóÐ  \ ÐÌà  àIn€its€review€of€the€evidence,€an€appellate€court€must€afford€the€State€ð ðthe€strongest€legitimateÐ ä4 Ðview€of€the€evidence€as€well€as€all€reasonable€and€legitimate€inferences€that€may€be€drawnÐ Ð  Ðtherefrom.ðð€€òòTuggleóó,€639€S.W.2d€at€914;òòóó€òòsee€alsoóó€òòSmithóó,€24€S.W.3d€at€279.€€The€court€may€not€ð ðre„Ð ¼  Ðweigh€or€re„evaluate€the€evidenceðð€in€the€record€below.€€òòEvansóó,€838€S.W.2d€at€191;€òòsee€alsoóó€òòBuggsóó,Ð ¨ø Ð995€S.W.2d€at€105.òòóó€€Likewise,€should€the€reviewing€court€find€particular€conflicts€in€the€trialÐ ”ä Ðtestimony,€the€court€must€resolve€them€in€favor€of€the€jury€verdict€or€trial€court€judgment.€€òòTuggleóó,Ð €Ð Ð639€S.W.2d€at€914.€€All€questions€involving€the€credibility€of€witnesses,€the€weight€and€value€to€beÐ l¼ Ðgiven€the€evidence,€and€all€factual€issues€are€resolved€by€the€trier€of€fact,€not€the€appellate€courts.€Ð X ¨ ÐòòSeeóó€òòState€v.€Morrisóó,€24€S.W.3d€788,€795€(Tenn.€2000);€€òòState€v.€Pappasóó,€754€S.W.2d€620,€623€(Tenn.Ð D!” ÐCrim.€App.€1987).Ð 0"€  ÐÔ#†XQ9XXXQ9Œ5#ÔÔ‡XQ9XXXQ9ÔÌà  àAfter€stopping€the€Defendant€for€operating€a€vehicle€with€a€broken€tail€light,€DeputiesÐ $X" ÐBirdwell€and€Pickard€observed€a€strong€odor€of€alcohol€and€noticed€that€the€Defendantððs€speech€wasÐ ô$D # Ðslurred.€€Both€officers€stated€that€the€Defendant€was€confused€about€where€he€was€and€where€he€wasÐ à%0!$ Ðgoing.€€After€conducting€field€sobriety€tests,€Deputy€Birdwell€determined€that€the€Defendant€wasÐ Ì&"% Ðintoxicated€and€asked€him€to€submit€to€a€blood€alcohol€content€test.€€The€Defendant€consented€andÐ ¸'#& Ðthe€test€revealed€a€blood€alcohol€content€of€.14%.€€Deputy€Pickard€also€testified€that,€based€upon€hisÐ ¤(ô#' Ðobservation€of€the€Defendant,€he€believed€the€Defendant€to€be€intoxicated.Ð )à$( Ðâ âÐ |*Ì%) Ðà  àBased€on€the€above€facts,€we€find€sufficient€evidence€to€support€the€jury€finding€theÐ ° Ðâ âDefendant€guilty€beyond€a€reasonable€doubt€of€driving€under€the€influence,€driving€under€theÐ œì Ðinfluence,€per€se,€and€driving€under€the€influence,€second€offense.€€The€judgment€of€the€trial€courtÐ ˆØ Ðis€affirmed.Ð tÄ ÐÌÓ  Óò òCONCLUSIONó óÐ L œ ÐÓØEÓà  àAccordingly,€for€the€foregoing€reasons,€we€AFFIRM€the€judgment€of€the€trial€court.Ô#†XQ9XXXQ9ß@#ÔÔ‡XQ9XXXQ9ÔÐ 8 ˆ ÐÔ#†XQ9XXXQ9šF#ÔÌÌà  àà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  à___________________________________€Ð ü L  Ðà  àà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  àDAVID€H.€WELLES,€JUDGE