WPC (yfv? րwˇ2^NJ,7/@m ̪$6{ 5֩3%0z1*K``xT{Bevfp/#{#xT1\zEֻW\ h?!~-CR~tr #+okn+~kqq%aM{yoީr@Z# 4dhɘ\6*pYo;fx[fZeCyX,Q8*"`e ,.ZտẮ~u,qȷAҸ8 ՂY)6u_Fs&mO*R%/Kt m:3{$qyiHN;=pwݦ)cz=_ TW+SR(e=دZԊ0;ެFvI*9_Hs._ƶ_Eqw յR?!GeWofJt?ߖHb %\^ b 0nUNwD4H\ zk m 2 #   WNEb 0 B 0 D3 D- 0K ASF 0_ 0D AG«/ (`$.8dd8    ("  Z6Times New Roman Regularlk. O3|x C:\PROGRA~1\COREL\WORDPE~1\TEMPLATE\CUSTOM~1\REVISE~1.WPTC:\Program Files\Corel\WordPerfect Office 2000\Template\Custom WP Templates\revised standard opinion.wptU resentencing JurHP LaserJet 4000 Series PCL6V,,,,V0Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5- -(|G2$ !.8dd8         0   d(|3w($ !.8dd8     VVVV'dxd)!dxdx( $ Figure  1  ^_X`YE<<CLevel 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5(|3w($ !.8dd8     ($$   1  X[Z&OLE 2.0 Box <=8C HKKKK !.8dd8     _   8XXdd8@hh5INTHECOURTOFCRIMINALAPPEALSOFTENNESSEE  @gg$ATNASHVILLE#5 #Ԉ #    @  @` December10,2002Session F XX #XX#TERRYL.BAKERv.STATEOFTENNESSEE  ? XX@@ DirectAppealfromtheCriminalCourtforDavidsonCounty  I @@No.92A647SethNorman,Judge  3 @@*AV) ` dE<` A   @@TTNo.M200200400CCAR3PCFiledDecember29,_2003_   AV) ` dE<m` A n       DavidG.Hayes,J.,separateconcurring. !q   Ijoinwiththemajorityinconcludingthatresentencingisnecessaryforthosereasonsrecited , intheopinion.Inaddition,Ifindthatresentencingisalsorequiredforthefollowingreasons.The  pleaagreement,whichisthesubjectofthisappeal,wasnotnegotiatedcontemporaneouslywiththe  petitioner'srevocationhearinginJanuary1997;rather,itwasnegotiatedatthetimeofhisoriginal  guiltypleasinMay1995.Atthattime,hereceivedatenyearcommunitycorrectionsentence.The  1995pleaagreementprovidedthatshouldheviolateaconditionofhistenyearsentence,hewould i thenservea"minimumoftwelveyearsatthirtyfivepercent...andtheStatewouldrequestatleast R partialconsecutivesentencing."Ifindthistypeofsentenceisnotauthorizedbyoursentencing ; laws. $ t 8   ` Ahighdegreeofexactitudeisrequiredinthepronouncementsofjudgments !F! imposingpenalservitude,andasentenceshouldbedefinite,certain,andnot "/" dependentuponanycontingencyorcondition.Itshouldclearlyrevealtheintention ## ofthecourtastothepunishmenttobeinflicted.Wherethecontraryisthecase,the $ $ benefitofanydoubtshouldberesolvedinfavorofthedefendant.% %   21AmJur2d,CriminalLaw,821(1998). l'"' Ѐ U(#(   TheStatenowseeksenforcementofanalternativesentencecontainedwithintheoriginal >)$) sentenceagreementbaseduponthecontingencyofaviolation.Ifindnoauthorityunderour '*w%* sentencinglawswhichwouldpermitimpositionofanalternativesentencebasedupontheexistence +`&+ ofafuturecontingency.TennesseeCodeAnnotatedSection4035211requiresthatasentencebe +I',  specificastolength. ,2(-Y _  Additionally,followingrevocation,thetrialcourtsimplypronouncedatwentyyearsentence   withnorequestbytrialcounselforasentencinghearingoranyopportunityforthepetitionertobe  heardortopresentwitnessesorevidencerelevanttosentencing.Whiletheaccusedinarevocation  proceedingisnotentitledto"thefullpanoplyofproceduralsafeguardsassociatedwithacriminal k trial,"heis,nonetheless,entitledtocertaindueprocessrights.Blackv.Romano,471U.S.606,613 T 14,105S.Ct.2254,225859(1985).Moreover,asalludedtointhemajorityopinion,in =  resentencingthepetitioner,thecourtorderedimpositionofasingletwentyyearsentenceforthe & v sevenclassBfelonyoffenses.Whenadefendantissentencedupondifferentcounts,thecorrect  _ methodofenteringjudgmentisnotforthetotaltimeingross,butforaspecifictimeundereach  H count.  1    Forthesereasonsandthoseexpressedinthemajorityopinion,Ifindremandforresentencing   necessary.      `     h   _________________________________________ b    `     h   DAVIDG.HAYES,JUDGE K