WPC2 eEJ6DžnRjVK ]}vBu̖C':ۗԩaMkw~AN㫑/O( Y66Ӝ4iU.yȠ>cIY[D]Q>‘YX$&V`?R.FlfѤc, -i&$"_YIq$0mjz`o)fj`Uɸ@("pL=6P]NwgGҾ* C7%OW}f%hj(YOk{ ^kIr|MIH~."&H}(dp㳵LRS1vI?u!yTWn?,%=Z,%JL* D =KW9\_ҮgI$&|EJGuV}Q7^DqRy>) =_~T*ԓS~_-&UBF % U.  nX 0P$ 4t  0 0D$ w@h U:  [ [CU:U: B D3 0DIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII AO 0D D/ B<6X9`(*Courier 12pt10cpi X%2A`ArialTT3|XV<6X9`(*Courier 12pt10cpiXXx6X@JQX@%2A`ArialTTt10cpiXXX2PQXP(($D  uM%(D(3$ !D      0  (#$  0   DEFDGDHIEJKLMӀ,cAZ"Arial RegularH Q  $D     1    ݀X XTheStatehasconcededthatthestatuteoflimitationsapplicabletopostconvictionpetitions `  didnotbegintorununtilthejudgmenttoresentencethepetitionerbecamefinal. Q  $D     1    ݀ X XTheStatehasconcededthatthestatuteoflimitationsapplicabletopostconvictionpetitions `  didnotbegintorununtilthejudgmenttoresentencethepetitionerbecamefinal.,cAZ"Arial Regular XXX X1XX   Ad FILEDXX1  October7,1998CecilW.CrowsonAppellateCourtClerkdAM ,cAZ"Arial Regular d$$$$'dxd(3$ !  -C<< CLevel 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5($$   1  ' dxdP Pd !D   MM` X72XXdd7  TR[A'Legal3'A' Legal3'TXXX XMr*<,(j 8` `@Ef ` 8ttxP `  rߛM  INTHECOURTOFCRIMINALAPPEALSOFTENNESSEE `  @cc:;ATNASHVILLE@7;AUGUST1998SESSION TERRYL.BAKER, L      T )  p     L      T )   C.C.A.NO.01C019711CR00522  `    Appellant,  򀀀   T ) P     L      T )  DAVIDSONCOUNTY  @  VS.   L      T ) 0     L      T )  HON.SETHNORMAN,   STATEOFTENNESSEE,     T )  JUDGE p    L      T )  Appellee.      T )  (PostConviction)  P  FORTHEAPPELLANT:     T   FORTHEAPPELLEE:   PAULJ.BRUNO L      T   JOHNKNOXWALKUP   WashingtonSquareBldg.      T   AttorneyGeneral&Reporter   p  222SecondAve.,North,Suite350M  !`  Nashville,TN372011652   T   DEBORAHA.TULLIS  "P    L      T   Asst.DistrictAttorneyGeneral  #@    L      T   CordellHullBldg.,2ndFl. $0    L      T   425FifthAve.,North̀   L      T   Nashville,TN37243 p&     L      T      L      T   VICTORS.JOHNSON,III  P(!    L      T   DistrictAttorneyGeneral   L      L      T   MARYHAUSMAN   +!$    L      T   Asst.DistrictAttorneyGeneral   L      T   WashingtonSquareBldg.   L      T   222SecondAve.,North,Suite500   L      T   Nashville,TN37201 !  d#  .%(    L      T    L   OPINIONFILED:򀀀 P7-1  REVERSED ANDREMANDEDFORHEARING  ;15  JOHNH.PEAY,  =48 Judge  P  X  @:; OPINION `     %  ThepetitionerpledguiltytosixcountsofdrugchargesinDavidsonCountycasenumber92A647onMay16,1995.HewassentencedasaRangeIoffendertoϜconKcKLurrentLLsecutiveLtenyearsentencestobeservedintheCommunityCorrectionsprogram.OnJanuary19,1996,thepetitionerwasfoundguiltyofviolatinghiscommunitycorrectionssentenceandthecourtincreasedhissentencefromtenyearstotwentyyearstoserve.OnDecember11,1996,thepetitionerfiledapetitionforpostconvictionrelief.Thepetitionwasdismissedbythetrialcourtonthegroundsthatitwasfiledoutsidetheapplicablestatuteoflimitations.Thepetitionernowappealsandarguesthepostconvictioncourterredwhenitdismissedthepetition.Weagreeandreversethejudgmentofthecourtbelowandremandthiscauseforahearingonthemeritsofthepetition.  Inhispostconvictionpetition,thepetitionerallegesthatitwasillegaland,therefore,unconstitutionalforthetrialcourttoincreasehissentencefromtenyearstotwentyyears.Thepetitionerfurtherallegesthathispetitionshouldnotbebarredforfallingoutsidethestatuteoflimitations.PetitionerarguesthatsincethecourtactionchallengedinhispostconvictionpetitionoccurredonJanuary19,1996,hispetition,filedonDecember11,1996,wasfiledwithintheoneyearstatuteoflimitations.  ThereisaoneyearstatuteoflimitationsperiodapplicabletoallpostconvictionpetitionsfiledafterMay10,1995.T.C.A.CC4030202.Thestatutespecificallystatesthat apersonincustodyunderasentenceofacourtofthisstatemustpetitionforpostconvictionreliefunderthispartwithinone(1)yearofthedateofthefinalactionof `6-0 thehigheststateappellatecourttowhichanappealistakenor,ifnoappealistaken,withinone(1)yearofthedateonwhichthejudgmentbecamefinal,orconsiderationofsuchpetitionshallbebarred.Inpetitionerscase,therewasnodirectappealorspecifiedposttrialmotion.ThisCourthasheld [@@i]f@@oneconvictedofacrimetakesnoactiontoperfecthisrighttoappeal,thestatuteoflimitations[applicabletopostconvictionpetitions]beginstorunfromthedate@@of  finalc99onviction.@@Warrenv.State,833S.W.2d 0 101,102(Tenn.Crim.App.1992)(emphasis@@added).Therefore,astheresentencinghearingwasthefinalactionfromwhichtherewasnoappeal,thestatuteoflimitationsdidnotbegintorununtilthirtydaysafterpetitionerwasresentenced.@@@@  #  1         @@  Sincepetitionerspostconvictionpetitionisnotbarredbythestatuteoflimitations,itisremandedtothetrialcourtforahearingonthemeritsofthepetition.@@Wenote@@thatinthe@@resentencing@@hearingitisclearthejudgehadtheauthoritytoresentencethe@@petitioner.@@@@@@ @@ @@The@@TennesseeCommunityCorrectionsActof1985,underwhichthepetitionerwassentenced,states DӜ@@A(e)ABAAB(4)Thecourtshallalsopossessthepowertorevokethesentenceimposedatanytimeduetotheconductofthedefendantortheterminationormodificationoftheprogramtowhichthedefendanthasbeensentenced,andthecourtmayresentencethedefendanttoanyappropriatesentencingalternative,includingincarceration,foranyperiodoftimeuptothemaximumsentenceprovidedfortheoffensecommitted,lessanytimeactuallyservedinanycommunitybasedalternativetoincarceration.@@    Q!@@ \-#( D T.C.A.@@4036106@@@@(Supp.1995).@@  AlthoughthisstatutemakesitclearthatthetrialjudgehastheauthoritytoresentenceadefendantoriginallysentencedundertheCommunityCorrectionsAct,the 4,+0 statuteisexplicitinthatajudgecanonlysentenceadefendant uptothemaximumsentencewithintheappropriaterange.Inaddition,theTennesseeSupremeCourthasheldthat atrialjudgeimposinganewsentenceasaresultofcommunitycorrectionsfailureisboundtosentencethedefendantwithintherangeoftheoriginalsentence.Statev.Patty,922S.W.2d102,104(Tenn.1995). 0   Therearealsocertainformalitiesrequiredbystatuteifthetrialcourtoptstoenhanceasentence.First,thecourtmuststateitsreasonsforimposinganewsentenceontherecord.T.C.A.DD4035209(c)and210(f)(g).Thestatuterequiresthattherecordofthesentencinghearing shallincludespecificfindingsoffactuponwhichapplicationofthesentencingprincipleswasbased.T.C.A.EEJJ4035209(c).Thestatutefurtherrequiresthat  (f)Wheneverthecourtimposesasentence,itshallplace  ontherecordeitherorallyorinwritingwhatenhancement  ormitigatingfactorsitfound,ifany,aswellasfindingsof  factasrequiredby4035209.  (g)Asentencemustbebasedonevidenceintherecord  ofthetrial,thesentencinghearing,thepresentencereport, !  n#   and,therecordofpriorfelonyconvictionsfiledbythedistrict(  attorneygeneralwiththecourtasrequiredby4035202(a).T.C.A.4035210. Thesestatutoryprovisionsaremandatory.Statev.@@Ervin@@,939S.W.2d581,584 *>!% (Tenn.Crim.App.1996)(citingStatev.@@Gauldin@@,737S.W.2d795,798(Tenn.Crim.App. j, #' 1987)).ThisCourthasheldthe purposeofthesestatutoryrequirementsistoguaranteethepreparationofaproperrecordforappellatereview.Anappellatecourtcannotrevieweitherthelengthor@@method@@ofservingasentenceunlessthefindingsofthetrialcourtarecontainedinthe@@record.Ervin,939@@S.W.2dat584. 3:*/   Inthecaseatbar,therecordisunclearregardingthe@@resentencing@@ofthe 27-3 petitioner.Theonlyreferenceto@@resentencing@@thepetitionerisanotationonthejudgmentformoftheoriginalsentenceto@@the@@communitycorrectionsprogramwhichreads, 11996PVSustainedsentenceincreasedto20yearsconsecutivew/DivisionIIIsentence@@jcr@@:12292to127939894to8795.@@Since@@thereisamaximumoftwelveyears@@thatmaybe@@imposedonanyRangeIoffenderconvictedofaclassBfelony,@@anysentenceovertwelveyearswouldbeillegal.SeeFStatev.FPatty,922S.W.2dG102,GHatH񛀜104III(Tenn.1995)I.@@ \    Insum,weconcludepetitionerspostconvictionpetitionwasnotbarredbythestatuteoflimitations.Wethereforereversethetrialcourtsdismissalofsuchpetitionandremandthiscausetothetrialcourtforahearingonthemeritsofthe@@petition.   L      T   ______________________________   L      T   JOHNH.PEAY,JudgeCONCUR:______________________________THOMAST.WOODALL,Judge______________________________L.TERRYLAFFERTY,SpecialJudge@@@@