WPCv 2# U> % 0UB4J^nmU:Tw@\ 0J 0T 0^: 0h 0r 0|r 0 0t 1u 0dy AQ . 0D 0@8 0Dx U6 D/ B! B> D3[ U. U* B) DC AMRv~%vHP LaserJet 4HPPCL5MS,,,,,,0nL<( 9Z &Courier RegularX($  7'CXXdXXd7    iUX` hp x (#%'0*,.8135@8:<H?AXi<6X9`(*Courier 12pt10cpiq$3|x<6X9`(*Courier 12pt10cpiXXx6X@JQX@,rAZ"Arial Regular {EeӀ2 0Indent123  2" 0Indent20 23  2, 0Indent30 0 23  26 0Indent40 0 0 23  2@ 0Indent50 0 0 0 23  2J 0Indent60 0 0 0 0 23  2T 0Indent70 0 0 0 0 0 23  2^ 0Indent80 0 0 0 0 0 0 23   ?AGMSYaioIndent0I.A.1.a.(1)(a)i)a)P 8Mac DefaultMac Default ` X!"#$&C<< CLevel 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5(3$ !  ("$    ($$   1  <  9p`(Courier New((' dxd dP Pd'''''dxd<  9p`(Courier<  9p`(Arial% Line 7 d,,,,7Border 1dd!#-C << G | !  #d#%  #d#  ` X  ""  ++   YYY FILED+X August17,1998CecilCrowson,Jr.+AppellateCourtClerk PtPtHH(FG(HH(d'hStyl{WP}01  HH  2$HH  Geneva  <Px443!#4$*$$*$ KK  Geneva  Geneva .,6 Geneva   h HD: Geneva  h HD: Geneva ! . %  #**Xd##**Xd#  ` X    X    \RA'\+ԛ7  XXdXXd7ќ!R./-A1-j|`  `@Rߛ ̀8 @ INTHECOURTOFCRIMINALAPPEALSOFTENNESSEE@ ATKNOXVILLE@   JUNE1998SESSIONSTATEOFTENNESSEE,  ) ̀    ) Appellee,  ) No.03C019708CC00322    )    ) GreeneCountyv.    )    ) HonorableJamesE.Beckner,Judge    )BOBBYJOEBALL,  ) (Robbery)    ) Appellant.  )@ CONCURRINGOPINION ̀ Iconcurintheresultsandmostofthereasoningpresentedinthemajorityopinion.However,Ihesitatetoacceptthepropositionimpliedintheopinionthatthefactthatpropertyofonlysmallvalueistakeninrobberyisofnomitigatingconsequenceinsentencing. Historically,theamountofpropertytakenhasbeenastandardbywhichtodeterminetheseriousnessofatheftrelatedcrime.Thesameistruetoday.Enhancementfactor(6),T.C.A.4035114,allowsforenhancementofasentenceifpersonalinjuryisinflicteduponavictimortheamountofdamagetopropertysustainedbyortakenfromthevictimareparticularlygreat.Thus,thevalueofpropertytakeninarobberycouldbesogreatastocallforenhancementunderfactor(6).Therecognizedrelevanceofthevalueofpropertytosentencingisnotaonewaystreet,though.Inthissense,Iamnotwillingtoholdthattheminimalvalueofpropertytakencanneveractinmitigation. Inthepresentcase,thedefendantarguesthatthetakingoffortytwodollarsandapocketknife isnotarobberywhichwouldrisetotheneedtoenhancethedefendantssentencetoitsmaximumlimitoftenyears.However,themainsentencingconcernsrelatetothedefendantcommittingarobberybyviolenceandhispreviouscriminalrecordandprevioushistoryofunwillingnesstocomplywithconditionsofreleaseintothecommunity.IfIweretoacceptthedefendantspropositionthattheamountofpropertytakenwasnotsubstantial,thatfactpalesincomparisontothemannerinwhichitwasobtainedandofthedefendantspasthistory.ItisforthesereasonsthatIconcurinthemajorityopinion.      ____________________________      JosephM.Tipton,Judge