WPC ";/Wzِ5S-is@F1Ux'9!ȖoLĬHރOifemSW{iƓMaCg'$Ld|u77vO:R10qiy`_+Uˤ7=1jV).gFsM6 ÄpY~OqAgQqO8.Ad5mR~R/QꧏXl~9{(~" K ^5Kjy ES7y~Ux/ҝ#Ў`Ibf7" #nOV/y\MoF<\/fD*\& ?!khމۮ3w>tW!Ry!c $^6\୘s,r'K=(0j\\H/!'qM"QD41Y$| [t4`#!@UNa % 0:N^ b w 4 % 4 m6 M 0~< 0D U: 8 $$BU,,,hXU: AQ BK 0Vh 0V 0D D3XHP LaserJet 8000 DN PS0(9 Z6Times New Roman RegularX($USUS., @d'L - -tpO'v3|xU ($USUS.,    1    _XQgXXXFXXQgԀStatev.Banes,874S.W.2d73,81(Tenn.Crim.App.1993).(.(3($ !USUS.,      0  (#$  0  ,  AZ"Arial Regular  ($USUS.,    3    _XQgXXXFXXQgԀTheamendedpetitionallegesthattheoriginalpetitionwasfiledonMay6,1996.Inaresponse `  0  totheStatesmotiontodismissthepetitionastimebarred,theDefendantallegesthattheclerks   officelostormisplacedthedocuments.TheDefendantapparentlysentacopyofthepetitionto  | theDistrictAttorneysofficeinMay,1996,buttherecordreflectsthatthepetitionandother  : documentswerenotfiledintheCourtClerksofficeuntilDecember2,1997.Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5 8 ($USUS.,    2    _XQgXXXFXXQgԀTylerWayneBanesv.State,No.02C019508CC00249,1996WL218355(Tenn.Crim.App., `  0  Jackson,May1,1996.,cAZArial  ^ ["USUS.,  _X<XXXXX<   Ad FILEDX<X  _Ocotober_Ԁ31,1999Cecil_Crowson_,Jr.AppellateCourtClerkdA ,yAZ"Arial Regular[\]_C<<C d(.3$ !USUS.,  (.3$ !USUS.,  ($$   1  ZZZZ'dxd !USUS.,  _X<XXX` XX<TR[A' Legal3'A' Legal3'T8TXXdd8      _INTHECOURTOFCRIMINALAPPEALSOFTENNESSEE `  xY_B2.jz`  `@ED ` 8ttxP| xATJACKSONAUGUSTSESSION,1999  TYLERW.BANES, h   )  C.C.A.NO.02C019812CC00378 n  `     h   ) ` Appellant,   h   ) r   `     h   ) `     h   )  MADISONCOUNTY v  VS. `     h   )   x   `     h   )  HON.FRANKLINMURCHISON, z  STATEOFTENNESSEE,  )  JUDGE |  `     h   ) ` Appellee.   h   )  (PostConviction)     ONAPPEALFROMTHEJUDGMENTOFTHECIRCUITCOURTOFMADISONCOUNTY  FORTHEAPPELLANT:     p FORTHEAPPELLEE:   .  TYLERW.BANES  h     PAULG.SUMMERS ", ProSe0 0 T$ T$0hT$T$0hT$hT$0T$T$AttorneyGeneralandReporter#(T$T$ TurneyCenter,Route1Only,TN371409709 0 h 0hT$hT$0T$T$ R.STEPHENJOBE% T$T$  `     h     AssistantAttorneyGeneral `     h     425FifthAvenueNorth `     h     Nashville,TN372430493  t(  `     h     JERRYWOODALL  r*!!  `     h     DistrictAttorneyGeneral n+""  `     h     ALFREDEARLS `     h     AssistantDistrictAttorneyGeneral `     h     P.O.Box2825 `     h     Jackson,TN38302  Z0&'  OPINIONFILED________________________ \4*+ AFFIRMEDDAVIDH.WELLES,JUDGE #X<X#  L8./   XX<OPINION #X<X # `     ` PursuanttoRule3oftheTennesseeRulesofAppellateProcedure,the  ~ Defendant,TylerW.Banesappealsasofrightthetrialcourtsorderdismissinghispro J sepetitionforpostconvictionrelief.Weconclude,withoutreachingthemeritsofthe v Defendantsclaims,thattheDefendantspetitionforpostconvictionreliefistime B  barred.WeaccordinglyaffirmthedismissaloftheDefendantspetitionforpost   convictionreliefbythetrialcourt. z   ` InMay1992,theDefendantwasconvictedofaggravatedrapeandaggravated r sexualbattery.InOctober1993,thisCourtdismissedtheDefendantsconvictionfor > aggravatedsexualbattery,butaffirmedhisconvictionforaggravatedrape. #  1      ׀The   TennesseeSupremeCourtdeniedtheDefendantsapplicationforpermissiontoappeal v in1994. !B  ` TheDefendantsubsequentlyfiledapetitionforwritoferrorcoramnobis, :% requestingthathisconvictionforaggravatedrapebesetasideandthathebegranted '  anewtrialbecauseofnewlydiscoveredevidence.Theevidenceuponwhichhebased (r" hispetitionwasarecantationoftestimonybytheminorvictimofhiscrime.However, *>!$ thetrialcourtdeniedthepetition,voicingdistrustofthevictimsrecantation.OnMay j, #& 1,1996,thisCourtaffirmedthetrialcourtsdismissalofthepetitionforwritoferror 6.$( coramnobis.N #  2       0&*  ` OnDecember2,1997,theDefendantfiledaprosepetitionforpostconviction 3:*. reliefandaproseamendmenttohispetitionforpostconvictionrelief.Thetrialcourt f5,0 summarilydismissedthepetitiononNovember20,1998,findingthatallissuesraised `  bytheDefendantinhispetitionwereeitherpreviouslydeterminedorwaivedinthatthey ,  werenotraisedondirectappeal.TheDefendantnowappealsprosefromthe   dismissalofhispetition. d  ` Theprosepetitionallegesgenerallyprosecutorialmisconduct,ineffective \  assistanceofcounselandimproperjuryinstructions.Anamendmenttothepetition (  allegesthattheindictmentisdefective.Fromourreviewoftherecordonappeal,we   concludethatthepetitionisbarredbytheapplicablestatuteoflimitations. `  ` AtthetimetheDefendantsconvictionbecamefinal,thestatuteoflimitations X applicabletopostconvictionproceedingswasthreeyears.Tenn.CodeAnn.4030 $ 102(repealed1995).Thethreeyearstatuteoflimitationswassubsequentlyshortened  tooneyearbythenewPostConvictionProcedureAct,whichtookeffectonMay10,  \ 1995.Seeid.4030210to310(1997).Thenewstatuteoflimitationsbeginstorun "( fromthe dateofthefinalactionofthehigheststateappellatecourttowhichanappeal T$ istakenor,ifnoappealistaken,[from]thedateonwhichthejudgmentbecamefinal.  &  Id.4030202(a).Atthetimethenewacttookeffect,thepreviousthreeyearstatute '" oflimitationshadnotexpiredfortheDefendant. )X $  ` Ofcourse,thenewPostConvictionProcedureActgovernsthispetitionandall P-#( petitionsforpostconvictionrelieffiledafterMay10,1995.Id.Thenotes /%* accompanyingthenewactexplainthat anypersonhavinggroundforreliefrecognized 0', under[thenewact]shallhaveatleastone(1)yearfromMay10,1995,tofileapetition 2T). ormotiontoreopenapetitionunderthenewact.Id.4030201compilersnotes; 4 +0 seealsoCarterv.State,952S.W.2d417,41920(Tenn.1997).Thenewactprovides L6,2 thatareviewingcourtmayentertainalatefiledpetitionforpostconvictionreliefonly 8.4 ifcertainnarrowexceptionsapply.SeeTenn.CodeAnn.4030202(b)(1)(3)(1997). 906 Ї ` TheDefendantsconvictionwasaffirmedbythisCourtondirectappealin `  October1993,andtheTennesseeSupremeCourtdeniedtheDefendantsapplication ,  forpermissiontoappealin1994.TheDefendantthushaduntilMay10,1996,oneyear   fromtheeffectivedateofthenewPostConvictionProcedureAct,tofilehispetitionfor d postconvictionrelief.Hispetition,filedonDecember2,1997,obviouslyfallsoutside 0 ofthistimeperiod. #  3      ׀Therefore,theDefendantspetitionisbarredbytheoneyear \  statuteoflimitationsapplicabletopostconvictionproceedings.Moreover,weconclude (  thatnoneofthestatutoryexceptionsapply.SeeTenn.CodeAnn.4030202(a),(b).    ` Accordingly,weaffirmthetrialcourtsdismissaloftheDefendantspetitionfor , postconvictionrelief. X  `     h    `    `     h   ____________________________________ "(  `     h   DAVIDH.WELLES,JUDGE n# CONCUR: '! ___________________________________ *>!% JERRYL.SMITH,JUDGE +$"& ___________________________________ 6.$) JAMESCURWOODWITT,JUDGE