WPC *8Zy幝Uc..j Xi y蹺~eۘ}Oorj'guw`o2>Ln+g`Zr:w%N;v@q7&[G)4P\=}HӄOa]- wg?.匦w,Դ&JZU}Tyvw[&ڇVΜeX3[/I \mU& )nvOx.1ai/їwNTѲka7EzU gWy_ۇ,e{$km/X?3nԛdo2~!,dzsV.d,w5`)]2%[X6wS7=GV ک~ZpjVUb9JHތl&FzrmуF Yg4OQq\'^rE!B _b=Ҥ}`+w>{GWb#\ %% UN+ 0y UN 0O ^ z,  wx 4|    g- mN 0 0D 0 0 0; 0 0 0 1u 72E,,,,,,,,,,,,,b....................... 1e6666666666666 0 B 0 D5G D-| 0K ASG 0  0D AHP LaserJet 4000 Series PCL6V,,,,V0(9 Z6Times New Roman Regular(`$.8dd8    ("  Z6Times New Roman Regular*GG (_16   /%` ` hp x /23  Ԁ/%` ` hp x /   Z1  C:\PROGRA~1\COREL\WORDPE~1\TEMPLATE\CUSTOM~1\REVISE~1.WPTC:\Program Files\Corel\WordPerfect Office 2000\Template\Custom WP Templates\revised standard opinion.wpth_B03|xLevel 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5U*AA (_17  5+ ` hp x 523  Ԁ5+ ` hp x 5  (#$  0  *88 (_15  ," hp x ,23  Ԁ," hp x ,  *55 (_14 ` ) hp x )23  Ԁ) hp x ) ` *22 (_13  &hhp x &23  Ԁ&hhp x &  *// (_12  #p x #23  Ԁ#p x #  *,, (_11 h  p x 23  Ԁ p x h *)) (_10  pp x 23  Ԁpp x    ALDRIDGEHCkidnappingspousalaffirmanceWedemeyerPottsBomaractus reus rea3#37=CIQYag1.a.i.(1)(a)(i)1)a)i)- - 35;AGMSY_11.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.(|G2wV$ !.8dd8         0  < d(|3?!$ !.8dd8     VVVV)!dxdx)!dxdx( $ Figure  1  ^_X`YE<<CLevel 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5(|3?!$ !.8dd8     ($$   1  X[Z&OLE 2.0 Box <=8C HKKKK !.8dd8     _   8XXdd8@hh|^INTHECOURTOFCRIMINALAPPEALSOFTENNESSEE  @gg$ATNASHVILLE#|^ #Ԉ #   XX #XX#|^ANTONIOM.BATTSv.STATEOFTENNESSEE#|^#XX  ? @@ AppealfromtheCircuitCourtforWayneCounty  M @@No.13321JimT.Hamilton,Judge  7 @@*AV!) ` dE<` A   @@TTNo.M200400470CCAR3HCFiledOctober26,_2004_   AV!) ` dE<q` A r  #XX߇#  XX #XX#XXThismatterisbeforetheCourtupontheStatesmotiontoaffirmthejudgmentofthetrialcourtby j  memorandumopinionpursuanttoRule20,RulesoftheCourtofCriminalAppeals.Theappellant S hasappealedthetrialcourtsordersummarilydismissingtheappellantspetitionforthewritof < habeascorpus.Inthatpetitiontheappellantallegesthattheindictmentwhichformsthebasisofhis %u convictionforaggravatedrobberyisvoidbecauseitfailstoallegesufficientfactstovestjurisdiction ^ intheconvictingcourt.Uponareviewoftherecordinthiscasewearepersuadedthatthetrialcourt G wascorrectinsummarilydismissingthehabeascorpuspetitionandthatthiscasemeetsthecriteria 0 foraffirmancepursuanttoRule20,RulesoftheCourtofCriminalAppeals.Accordingly,the  Statesmotionisgrantedandthejudgmentofthetrialcourtisaffirmed.   Tenn.R.App.P.3AppealasofRight;JudgmentoftheTrialCourtisAffirmed.   #X#XX.JerryL.Smith,J.,deliveredtheopinionofthecourt,inwhichDavidH.Welles,andRobertW. W Wedemeyer,JJ.,joined. @ AntonioM.Batts,prose,Clifton,Tennessee.  b PaulG.Summers,AttorneyGeneral&Reporter;ThomasE.Williams,III,AssistantAttorney !4! General,fortheappellee,StateofTennessee. "" #XX #XX   `     h #XX #g X> X g@! MEMORANDUMOPINION  &!&   Awritofhabeascorpusisavailableonlywhenitappearsonthefaceofthejudgmentorthe l(#( recordthattheconvictingcourtwaswithoutjurisdictiontoconvictorsentencethedefendantorthat U)$) thedefendantisstillimprisoneddespitetheexpirationofhissentence.Archerv.State,851S.W.2d >*%* 157,164(Tenn.1993);Pottsv.State,833S.W.2d60,62(Tenn.1992).However,ifafterareview '+w&+ ofthehabeaspetitionersfilingsthetrialcourtdeterminesthatthepetitionerwouldnotbeentitled ,`', toreliefthenthepetitionmaybesummarilydismissed.Tenn.CodeAnn.2921109;Stateexrel. ,I(- Byrdv.Bomar,214Tenn.476,381S.W.2d280(Tenn.1964). -2). _ԇ  Avalidindictmentisessentialtovestjurisdictionintheconvictingcourt,andthereforean  indictmentthatissodefectivethatitfailstoinvestjurisdictionmaybechallengedinahabeascorpus  proceeding.Statev.Wyatt,24S.W.3d319,32023(Tenn.2000).Intheinstantcasetheindictment  aboutwhichtheappellantcomplainsisattachedtothehabeascorpusproceedingsandisinthe k recordonappeal.Theindictmentsetsforththeappellantsname,thedateoftheoffense,themens T reaandactusreusofaggravatedrobbery.Moreover,theindictmentclearlyreferencesthe =  aggravatedrobberystatute,TennesseeCodeAnnotatedsection3913402.Giventhese & v circumstances,itisclearthateachcountinthisindictmentissufficienttovestjurisdictioninthe  _ convictingcourt.SeeStatev.Sledge,15S.W.3d93,95(Tenn.2000);Statev.Carter,988S.W.2d  H 145,148(Tenn.1999);Ruffv.State,978S.W.2d95,100(Tenn.1998);Statev.Hill,854S.W.2d  1  725,728(Tenn.1997).Thus,thetrialcourtwascorrectinsummarilydismissingtheappellants    habeascorpuspetition.     Rule20,RulesoftheCourtofCriminalAppealsprovidesinteralia:   8  8`   TheCourt,withtheconcurrenceofalljudgesparticipatinginthe n  case,whenanopinionwouldhavenoprecedentialvalue,mayaffirm W  thejudgmentoractionofthetrialcourtbymemorandumopinion @ ratherthanbyformalopinion,when:)y` x` x 8  8`   8 ` x` xThejudgmentisrenderedortheactionistakenina K proceedingbeforethetrialjudgewithoutajury,and 4 suchjudgmentoractionisnotadeterminationof  guilt,andtheevidencedoesnotpreponderateagainst  thefindingofthetrialjudge...     Wefindthatthiscasemeetsthecriteriaoftheabovequotedruleandthereforewegrantthe q StatesmotionfiledunderRule20andweaffirmthejudgmentofthetrialcourt. x #XX XX>Z #X> XXX Z #XX XX>:#   `     h     ___________________________________ N    `     h     JERRYL.SMITH,JUDGE