ÿWPCØ Œ^ЧGu…y0ÒÓ’£xÒ3°67–å•äaÒx,^GŠ|Hš…*£nÓk  !ëÂç&øIÞÂØ°î»êä[ŽÙKÊàO`3ïÓxk-vx—@/é—Ýj+·N- vPê0`s]i,ü=Ÿ²µàz³²8BDìÕ¯AI­$f¹+¾;“¨$õZd¦$üóé¶±vˆŒ%—Jd0ÅEx³I‘ö±ÒÓ? íñ†ðÞìQk˜ª.Ưb}Ûz¼¶|…ŒYUȃƒ$6;!:ÊtüÐêÓUV†0¥åÀ3MÂCHf1cÒòwŸ '¡‹½c”^vœKK÷ØHcªFhápºëØ…A:sÙèNª8Lۥ¹òsZBzê Êj@½žÿ-5š)`JóšTƒ”èé·Ô‘`/I[§ª½°;1 u•&UCB¤E¯¥”ç{1á€ÌŠÆWT³?xb€¾<d/ˆr°PÛú„Ó}{\8Äê*â«ÁCã×ÿrí&b æÿ X£=£ô¦•IÓ±£dS>—îjòàÎv¨|'/åFø™x%×Ôõ 9r!pK¼û¬}Þã!—8UïáÚÖ—+¿àÂXå2ñùÇ<^|ë‚¶ ¦ub %\^ b 0ˆnUNöwD4H\ zkÒå· m¹ ¹ #ÁÐ Æ‘ ÆW Æ Æã ©N±³³EËËËËËËËËËËËËËËËËËËËËËËËËbÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍ 0ëÕÕÕÕ BÀÀ 0¤Ý D3 D-´ 0Káá AS,Æ 0¤E 0Dé A«-»2ª+) (`£ª$¡¡Ñ€.ÑÑ8€½­»»d»»d8ÑÑ ý ÑÓ  Ó(í€"  Z6Times New Roman RegularÖJ~''•m œ3|x ˜C:\PROGRA~1\COREL\WORDPE~1\TEMPLATE\CUSTOM~1\REVISE~1.WPTC:\Program Files\Corel\WordPerfect Office 2000\Template\Custom WP Templates\revised standard opinion.wptÿU‹ÿÀÀÀ˜HP LaserJet 4000 Series PCL 6ÈÈÈÈÈÈÈÈ0Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5‚Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5„Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5…Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5  ØØ- ù-(|G2‰Ý$¤¤Ý ƒ£ª!ÝÑ€.ÑÑ8€ P»»dd8ÑÑ ý ÑÓ  ÓÝ  Ýà  àòòÚ  Ú0Ú  ÚóóÔ€ômÔò»»Ô d(|3Žf$££Ý ƒ£ª!ÝÑ€.ÑÑ8€ P»»dd8ÑÑ ý ÑÓ  ÓÝ  ÝVVVV'ÿÿdxd)!ÈÈÈÈdxdx( ±þ$’’ò òFigure€Ú  Ú1Ú  Úó ó^_X`YEþÿ<<CÿÿƒLevel 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5(|3Žf$¢¢Ý ƒ£ª!ÝÑ€.ÑÑ8€ P»»dd8ÑÑ ý ÑÓ  ÓÝ  Ý($$””ò òÚ  Ú1Ú  Úó óX[Z&OLE 2.0 Box <=8ÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿCÿÿ HKKKKÝ ƒ£ª!ÝÑ€.ÑÑ8€ P»»ddÈ8ÑÑ ý ÑÓ  ÓÝ  ÝÔ_ÔÑ  ÑÑ  ÑÔ€¼ P»»»ÔÑ8€`ìXXdæ»»d8ÑÑ€×+Ñà@ttìàÔ‡î:# PÔIN€THE€COURT€OF€CRIMINAL€APPEALS€OF€TENNESSEEˆÐ ° Ðà@kk$ìàAT€NASHVILLEÔ#†¼ P»îî:##ԈРР ÐÓ  Óà @ àà @` àJuly,€2000€SessionÐ ð@ ÐÔ‡X`ìX»¼ PÔÌò òÔ#†¼ P»XX`ì!#ÔSTATE€OF€TENNESSEE€v.€SHAWN€Ô_ÔDONTAYÔ_Ô€BEARDÔ‡X`ìX»¼ PÔó óÐ ä4 ÐÌà@@½½ìàò òDirect€Appeal€from€the€Circuit€Court€for€Warren€CountyÐ Ø ( Ðà@@øøìàNo.€F„7264€€€€€€Charles€Ô_ÔHastonÔ_Ô,€JudgeÐ ¾  ÐÌà @ àÌà@@ìì*ìàßA€V) °°` d€÷E<o` AßÐ pÀ  ÐÌà@@TTìàNo.€M1997„00114„CCA„R3„CD€„€Filed€September€8,€Ô_Ô2000Ô_ÔÐ eµ  ÐÌßA€V) °°` dE<0` AßÐ 1  Ðó óÌÓ  ÓÌÓýÓÌò òó óÓ  ÓÔ#†¼ P»XX`ì¯#ÔÔ‡X`ìX»¼ PÔà  àThe€Defendant,€Shawn€Ô_ÔDontayÔ_Ô€Beard,€appeals€as€of€right€following€his€conviction€in€theÐ òB ÐWarren€County€Circuit€Court.€€Defendant€was€convicted€by€a€jury€for€sale€of€a€Schedule€II€controlledÐ Ø( Ðsubstance,€cocaine,€in€an€amount€of€less€than€point€five€(0.5)€grams€within€one€thousand€feet€ofÐ ¾ Ðschool€grounds.€€Defendant€argues€there€was€insufficient€evidence€regarding€his€identity€to€supportÐ ¤ô Ðhis€conviction.€€He€further€challenges€the€length€of€his€sentence€on€the€grounds€that€the€State€raisedÐ ŠÚ Ðthe€felony€classification€of€his€offense€pursuant€to€the€Drug„Free€School€Zone€Act€but€failed€toÐ pÀ Ðprovide€the€Defendant€with€notice€of€enhancement.€€The€judgment€of€the€trial€court€is€affirmed.Ð V¦ ÐÌÔ#†¼ P»XX`ìP#ÔÔ‡X`ìX»¼ PÔÓ!Óò òTenn.€R.€App.€P.€3€Appeal€as€of€Right;€Judgment€of€the€Circuit€Court€Affirmedó óÐ "r ÐÌòòÓ  ÓÔ#†¼ P»àX`ìô#ÔÔ‡X`ìX.¼ PÔThomas€T.€Ô_ÔWoodallÔ_Ô,€J.óó,€delivered€the€opinion€of€the€court,€in€which€òòDavid€G.€Hayes€óóand€òòNormaÐ î> ÐMcGee€Ogle,€JJ.óó,€joined.Ð Ô$ ÐÌBilly€K.€Ô_ÔTollisonÔ_Ô,€III,€Ô_ÔMcMinnvilleÔ_Ô,€Tennessee€(on€appeal)€and€Robert€Peters,€Winchester,Ð  ð ÐTennessee€(at€trial)€€for€the€appellant,€Shawn€Ô_ÔDontayÔ_Ô€Beard.Ð † Ö  ÐÔ#†¼ P»XX`ì¾ #ÔÔ‡X`ìX»¼ PÔÌPaul€G.€Summers,€Attorney€General€and€Reporter;€Jennifer€L.€Ô_ÔBledsoeÔ_Ô,€Assistant€Attorney€General;Ð R"¢" ÐWilliam€M.€Locke,€District€Attorney€General;€and€Thomas€J.€Miner,€Assistant€District€AttorneyÐ 8#ˆ# ÐGeneral,€for€the€appellee,€State€of€Tennessee.Ð $n$ ÐÔ#†¼ P»XX`ìí #ÔÓ ÓÔ‡X`ìX»¼ PÔÌà@@OO&ìàò òOPINIONó óÔ#†¼ P»XX`ìŠ #ÔÔ‡X`ìX»¼ PÔÐ ê%:!& ÐÌÔ#†¼ P»XX`ìì #ÔÓ  ÓÔ€X`ìX»¼ PÔà  àDefendant€Shawn€Ô_ÔDontayÔ_Ô€Beard€pled€not€guilty€in€the€Warren€County€Circuit€Court€to€felonyÐ ¶'#( Ðsale€of€0.4€grams€Schedule€II€controlled€substance,€cocaine,€within€one€thousand€feet€of€schoolÐ œ(ì#) Ðgrounds.€€Sale€of€cocaine€in€an€amount€less€than€0.5€grams€is€a€Class€C€felony.€€However,€pursuantÐ ‚)Ò$* Ðto€the€Drug„Free€School€Zone€Act,€it€is€punished€one€classification€higher€when€the€sale€of€drugsÐ h*¸%+ Ðoccurs€on€the€grounds€or€facilities€of€any€school€or€within€one€thousand€feet€of€the€real€property€thatÐ N+ž&, Ðcomprises€a€public€or€private€elementary€school,€middle€school,€or€secondary€school.€€DefendantÐ 4,„'- Ðproceeded€to€jury€trial€and€was€convicted€as€charged.€€After€a€sentencing€hearing,€the€trial€courtÐ -j(.ý ÐÔ_Ôsentenced€Defendant€as€a€standard€Range€I€offender€to€a€term€of€twelve€years€and€a€fine€in€theÐ ° Ðamount€of€twenty€thousand€dollars.€€Defendant€raises€the€following€issues€in€his€appeal:€(1)€whetherÐ –æ Ðthe€trial€court€erred€by€not€granting€Defendant's€motion€for€acquittal€or€motion€for€a€new€trial€dueÐ |Ì Ðto€insufficient€evidence€regarding€his€identity;€and€(2)€whether€the€trial€court€erred€when€it€imposedÐ b² Ða€sentence€based€on€a€Class€B€felony€instead€of€a€Class€C€felony€when€the€State€did€not€give€theÐ H˜ ÐDefendant€ten€days€notice€of€its€intent€to€seek€an€increase€in€sentence€based€upon€the€higher€felonyÐ . ~ Ðclassification€mandated€by€the€Drug„Free€School€Zone€Act,€T.C.A.€39„17„432(b).€€After€a€reviewÐ  d Ðof€the€record,€we€affirm€the€judgment€of€the€trial€court.Ð ú J ÐÌà@HH&ìàI.€€FACTSˆÐ Æ   ÐÌà  àOfficer€Bobby€Edwards€of€the€Warren€County€Sheriff's€Department€testified€that€heÐ ’â  Ðparticipated€in€an€undercover€drug€investigation€in€April€1996€during€which€the€police€employed€anÐ xÈ  Ðinformant€for€the€purpose€of€purchasing€drugs.€€Edwards€testified€that€he€searched€the€car€and€personÐ ^®  Ðof€the€informant€for€narcotics€prior€to€the€informant's€meeting€with€the€Defendant€and€that€he€foundÐ D”  Ðnothing.€€After€searching€the€informant,€Edwards€witnessed€the€installation€of€a€video€camera€andÐ *z  Ðaudio€recording€equipment€in€the€informant's€car€by€Officer€McGinnis.€€The€officers€followed€theÐ ` Ðinformant€to€the€place€where€the€informant€met€with€the€Defendant€and€waited€until€the€transactionÐ öF Ðwas€completed,€then€followed€the€informant€as€he€returned€to€the€designated€meeting€place.€Ð Ü, ÐAlthough€the€officers€could€not€visually€observe€the€informant€at€all€times,€they€monitored€theÐ Â Ðinformant's€entire€journey€by€audio€transmission€and€recorded€his€transaction€with€the€Defendant€onÐ ¨ø Ðvideotape.€€Ð ŽÞ ÐÌà  àOfficer€Edwards€testified€that€immediately€after€the€informant's€meeting€with€the€Defendant,Ð Zª Ðhe€reviewed€the€videotape€and€was€able€to€identify€both€the€voice€and€physical€appearance€of€theÐ @ ÐDefendant€on€the€tape.€€From€the€videotape,€Edwards€also€determined€that€the€transaction€occurredÐ &v Ðat€an€Exxon€station€across€from€the€Bobby€Ray€Elementary€School€and€that€the€distance€from€theÐ  \ Ðschool€to€the€place€where€the€Defendant€and€the€informant€met€was€less€than€three€hundred€feet.€€TheÐ òB Ðinformant€handed€Officer€McGinnis€what€appeared€to€be€narcotics€in€the€form€of€little€brown€rocksÐ Ø( Ðduring€the€meeting€with€the€officers€after€his€transaction€with€the€Defendant.Ð ¾ ÐÌà  àOfficer€Marty€McGinnis€of€the€Warren€County€Sheriff's€Department€testified€that€he€was€theÐ Š Ú Ðsecond€officer€participating€in€the€undercover€drug€investigation€involving€the€Defendant.€€OfficerÐ p!À  ÐMcGinnis€€witnessed€officer€Edwardððs€search€of€the€informant's€car€and€person,€after€whichÐ V"¦! ÐMcGinnis€installed€audio€and€video€surveillance€equipment€in€the€informant's€car.€€Afterward,Ð <#Œ" ÐMcGinnis€and€Edwards€followed€the€informant€until€his€meeting€with€the€Defendant€was€completed.€Ð "$r# ÐLater€the€informant€met€with€the€officers€again€and€handed€McGinnis€some€small€white„brownÐ %X $ Ðcolored€rocks.€€McGinnis€placed€the€rocks€in€an€envelope,€then€sealed€and€initialed€the€substance€forÐ î%>!% Ðuse€as€evidence€during€trial.Ð Ô&$"& ÐÌà  àMichael€Watkins,€the€informant,€testified€that€he€was€employed€by€the€Warren€CountyÐ  (ð#( ÐSheriff's€Department€as€an€undercover€agent€to€purchase€crack€cocaine.€€Watkins€has€worked€forÐ †)Ö$) Ðother€law€enforcement€agencies€in€an€undercover€capacity€as€well€and€for€a€period€of€approximatelyÐ l*¼%* Ðnineteen€years.€€Watkins€testified€that€after€he€and€his€vehicle€were€searched€by€officer€Edwards,Ð R+¢&+ Ðsurveillance€equipment€was€installed€in€his€car.€€Watkins€then€drove€to€the€place€where€he€met€withÐ 8,ˆ', Ðthe€Defendant.€€When€he€arrived,€Watkins€was€instructed€by€someone€(whose€identity€is€unknownÐ ° Ðfrom€the€record)€to€drive€across€the€street€to€an€Exxon€service€station€where€Watkins€was€approachedÐ –æ Ðby€the€Defendant.€€Watkins€testified€that€the€Defendant€sold€him€some€crack€cocaine€for€sixty€dollarsÐ |Ì Ðwhich€Watkins€immediately€turned€over€to€Officer€McGinnis€when€he€met€with€the€officersÐ b² Ðafterward.€€After€Watkins€reviewed€the€officers'€videotape€of€the€transaction€between€himself€andÐ H˜ Ðthe€Defendant,€he€confirmed€that€the€tape€was€an€accurate€representation€of€what€happened.Ð . ~ ÐÌà  àThe€prosecutor€and€defense€attorneys€stipulated€at€trial€that€David€Brown,€Special€Agent€ofÐ ú J Ðthe€Tennessee€Bureau€of€Investigation,€conducted€a€chemical€analysis€of€the€substance€that€OfficerÐ à 0 ÐMcGinnis€received€from€the€informant€and€that€this€evidence€was€point€four€(0.4)€grams€of€a€cocaineÐ Æ   Ðbased€substance€which€is€a€Schedule€II€controlled€drug.Ð ¬ ü  ÐÌà@ŠŠ$ìàII.€ANALYSISˆÐ xÈ  ÐÌA.€€òòSufficiency€of€the€EvidenceóóÐ D”  ÐÌà  àDefendant€contends€that€the€evidence€was€insufficient€to€sustain€a€conviction€because€theÐ ` ÐState€failed€to€establish€beyond€a€reasonable€doubt€that€the€Defendant€engaged€in€the€conduct€allegedÐ öF Ðin€the€indictment.€€Specifically,€the€Defendant€claims€that€the€prosecution's€witnesses€failed€to€makeÐ Ü, Ða€courtroom€identification€of€the€Defendant.€€Because€of€this,€the€Defendant€argues€that€the€trialÐ Â Ðcourt€erred€by€not€granting€Defendant's€motion€for€acquittal€or€motion€for€a€new€trial€on€the€groundsÐ ¨ø Ðof€insufficient€evidence€regarding€his€identity.€€We€disagree.Ð ŽÞ ÐÌà  àWhen€an€accused€challenges€the€sufficiency€of€the€convicting€evidence,€the€standard€isÐ Zª Ðwhether,€after€reviewing€the€evidence€in€the€light€most€favorable€to€the€prosecution,€any€€rationalÐ @ Ðtrier€of€fact€could€have€found€the€accused€guilty€of€every€element€of€the€offense€beyond€a€reasonableÐ &v Ðdoubt.€€òòJackson€v.€Virginiaóó,€443€U.S.€307,€319,€99€S.Ct.€2781,€2789,€61€L.Ed.2d€560,€573€(1979).€Ð  \ ÐIn€determining€the€sufficiency€of€the€evidence,€this€Court€does€not€reweigh€or€reevaluate€theÐ òB Ðevidence.€€òòState€v.€Cabbageóó,€571€S.W.2d€832,€835€(Tenn.€1978).€€Questions€concerning€theÐ Ø( Ðcredibility€of€witnesses,€the€weight€and€value€to€be€given€to€the€evidence,€as€well€as€factual€issuesÐ ¾ Ðraised€by€the€evidence€are€resolved€by€the€trier€of€fact,€not€this€Court.€€òòIdóó.€€Nor€may€this€CourtÐ ¤ô Ðsubstitute€its€inferences€for€those€drawn€by€the€trier€of€fact€from€circumstantial€evidence.€€òòLiakas€v.Ð Š Ú ÐStateóó,€199€Tenn.€298,€305,€286€S.W.2d€856,€859€(1956).€€To€the€contrary,€this€Court€is€required€toÐ p!À  Ðafford€the€State€the€strongest€legitimate€view€of€the€evidence€contained€in€the€record€as€well€as€allÐ V"¦! Ðreasonable€and€legitimate€inferences€which€may€be€drawn€from€the€evidence.€€òòState€v.€Tuttleóó,€914Ð <#Œ" ÐS.W.2d€926,€932€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.€1995).€€Since€a€verdict€of€guilt€removes€the€presumption€of€aÐ "$r# Ðdefendantððs€innocence€and€replaces€it€with€a€presumption€of€guilt,€the€defendant€has€the€burden€ofÐ %X $ Ðproof€on€the€sufficiency€of€the€evidence€at€the€appellate€level.€€òòState€v.€Tuggleóó,€639€S.W.2d€913,€914Ð î%>!% Ð(Tenn.€1982).Ð Ô&$"& ÐÌà  àBefore€a€defendant€can€be€convicted,€the€State€of€Tennessee€is€required€to€prove€that€he€wasÐ  (ð#( Ðthe€person€who€committed€the€crime€in€question.€€òòState€v.€Andre€Deshun€Gossóó,€No.€02C01„9809„Ð †)Ö$) ÐCC„00294,€1999€WL€360162,€at€*2,€Obion€County€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.,€Jackson,€June€3,€1999)€òòperm.Ð l*¼%* Ðto€appeal€deniedóó€(Tenn.€1999)€(citing€òòWhite€v.€Stateóó,€533€S.W.2d€735,€744€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.Ð R+¢&+ Ð1975)).€€The€identity€of€defendants€is€a€question€of€fact€solely€for€the€jury.€€òòState€v.€Phillipsóó,€728Ð 8,ˆ', ÐS.W.2d€21,€25€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.€1986)€(citing€òòState€v.€Crawfordóó,€635€S.W.2d€704,€705€(Tenn.Ð ° ÐCrim.€App.€1982)€(no€error€where€witnessðð€testimony€referred€to€appellants€by€name;€appellantsððÐ –æ Ðidentity€could€reasonably€be€determined€or€inferred€by€the€jury)).€€Whether€the€State€carried€itsÐ |Ì Ðburden€of€proof€that€the€defendant€committed€the€crime€in€question€is€a€question€of€fact€for€theÐ b² Ðdetermination€of€the€jury€after€consideration€of€the€proof€submitted€at€the€trial.€òòóó€€òòGossóó,€No.€02C01„Ð H˜ Ð9809„CC„00294,€1999€WL€360162,€at€*2€(citing€òòWhite€v.€Stateóó,€533€S.W.2d€735,€744€(Tenn.€Crim.Ð . ~ ÐApp.€1975)).€€A€courtroom€identification€is€not€a€prerequisite€to€convict€a€defendant€of€a€criminalÐ  d Ðoffense.€€òòIdóó.€(citing€òòState€v.€Danny€R.€Morrisóó,€No.€01C01„9506„CC„00206,€1996€WL€233989€at€*2,Ð ú J ÐHumphreys€County€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.,€Nashville,€May€9,€1996)€òòperm.€to€appeal€deniedóó€(Tenn.Ð à 0 Ð1996).Ð Æ   ÐÌà  àDefendant€argues€that€because€the€Stateððs€witnesses€failed€to€identify€the€Defendant€in„courtÐ ’â  Ðas€the€person€who€sold€Watkins€the€crack€cocaine,€referring€instead€to€the€Defendant€in€the€third„Ð xÈ  Ðperson€as€ð ðthe€Defendantðð€and€ð ðthe€Defendant,€Beard,ðð€the€State€failed€to€prove€the€specific€identityÐ ^®  Ðof€the€Defendant€as€the€person€who€sold€the€narcotics€to€Watkins.€€However,€Watkins€clearly€statedÐ D”  Ðin€his€testimony€that€the€individual€who€sold€him€the€crack€cocaine€was€the€Defendant,€ShawnÐ *z  ÐBeard:€in€response€to€the€question,€ð ð[h]ave€you€reviewed€the€tape€of€the€purchase€that€was€made€inÐ ` Ðthis€case€between€yourself€and€the€Defendant,€Beard?ðð€Watkins€answered€affirmatively.€€WatkinsÐ öF Ðfurther€testified€that€the€videotape€was€an€accurate€representation€of€what€happened€on€the€day€thatÐ Ü, Ðhe€met€with€the€Defendant.€€Moreover,€Officer€Edwards€positively€identified€both€the€voice€and€theÐ Â Ðphysical€appearance€of€the€individual€appearing€on€the€video€and€sound€tapes€with€the€informant€asÐ ¨ø Ðthose€of€the€Defendant€whom€he€had€met€on€another€occasion.€€Based€on€the€testimonies€of€WatkinsÐ ŽÞ Ðand€Officer€Edwards,€there€was€sufficient€evidence€whereby€a€rational€trier€of€fact€could€determineÐ tÄ Ðthat€the€Defendant,€Shawn€Beard,€was€the€perpetrator€of€this€offense€beyond€a€reasonable€doubt.€Ð Zª ÐThe€Defendant€is€not€entitled€to€relief€on€this€issue.Ð @ ÐÌB.€€òòSentencingóóÐ  \ ÐÌà  àDefendant€contends€that€€the€trial€court€erred€when€it€imposed€a€sentence€based€on€a€ClassÐ Ø( ÐB€felony€instead€of€a€Class€C€felony€because€the€State€did€not€give€the€Defendant€a€ten„day€noticeÐ ¾ Ðof€its€intent€to€seek€an€enhanced€sentence.€€Defendant€argues€that€because€the€State€failed€to€give€theÐ ¤ô ÐDefendant€proper€notice,€his€sentence€should€€be€reduced€to€a€term€consistent€with€a€Class€C€felony,Ð Š Ú ÐRange€I€offender.€We€disagree.Ð p!À  ÐÌà  àThe€Drug„Free€School€Zone€Act,€specifically€T.C.A.€ðð€39„17„432(b),€provides€that€aÐ <#Œ" Ðviolation€of€section€39„17„417€shall€be€punished€one€classification€higher€than€provided€in€the€statuteÐ "$r# Ðwhen€the€drug€offense€is€committed€within€one€thousand€feet€of€elementary,€middle,€or€secondaryÐ %X $ Ðschool€premises.€€Defendantððs€brief€challenges€his€enhanced€sentence€as€excessive€on€the€ground€thatÐ î%>!% Ðthe€State€did€not€comply€with€a€ten„day€notice€requirement€set€forth€in€section€39„17„432(g).€Ð Ô&$"& ÐDefendantððs€interpretation€of€the€statute€is€incorrect.Ð º' #' ÐÌà  àTenn.€Code€Ann.€section€39„17„432(g)€states:€ð ð[t]he€sentence€of€a€defendant€who,€as€theÐ †)Ö$) Ðresult€of€a€single€act,€violates€both€subsection€(b)€and€ðð€39„17„417(k),€may€only€be€enhanced€one€(1)Ð l*¼%* Ðtime€under€such€sections€for€each€act.ðð€€This€subsection€requires€the€state€to€elect€under€whichÐ R+¢&+ Ðsection€it€intends€to€seek€enhancement€of€the€defendantððs€sentence€and€then€provide€notice€to€theÐ 8,ˆ', Ðdefendant.€€The€ð ðnoticeðð€requirement€in€section€39„17„432(g)€is€not€required,€however,€unless€thereÐ ° Ðis€proof€that€the€Defendant€violated€both€subsection€39„17„432(b)€and€subsection€39„17„417(k).€€ToÐ –æ Ðviolate€subsection€(k),€the€recipient€or€the€intended€recipient€of€the€controlled€substance€must€beÐ |Ì Ðunder€eighteen€(18)€years€of€age.€€Since€there€is€no€proof€that€Defendant€violated€subsection€(k)€(theÐ b² Ðð ðrecipient,ðð€the€informant€in€this€case,€testified€that€he€has€worked€as€an€undercover€agent€for€ð ðaboutÐ H˜ Ðnineteen€yearsðð),€section€39„17„417(g)€does€not€apply.€€Defendant€is€not€entitled€to€relief€on€thisÐ . ~ Ðissue.Ð  d ÐÌà@ºº"ìàIII.€€CONCLUSIONˆÐ à 0 ÐÌà  àFor€the€above€reasons€we€AFFIRM€the€judgment€of€the€trial€court.Ð ¬ ü  ÐÌÌà  àà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  à____________________________________Ð ^®  Ðà  àà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  àTHOMAS€T.€WOODALL,€JUDGE