ÿWPCÎ ,jTí{È`ˆK›ne´k”p1Ùãdz NSq% äý§HKNl<°ïe¢aSó(àº`Dïàõž ÑUôÙ”kÀ{G*RÅé|5}+³ÕÎÑu:ðo‚c܈q0 h÷£' @¸'ØŸÞ]Å|uŸªhº/ %¨k{q¡`ͱ •Ð~£Ú«“Í5[…ìGÅæí$PÉòš{mAÒï5ë¤ >œÂ}ÚéÆãO0lD†£ó/5Äâ›lT¦‚Ιî#Ë—TpOÔcpÈÛ½ K!ìü»%ºÔùÅuQ¥ ¥R«‰žzªøŸI£éq3¦q§„}OËú v{P¢ÆÔ‡ïíîê¢kùP¿¥KøÈ¾–Gg#ö|J®œ&,ðµdX*qŽS^ÔƒOæÚÞD>ô¶`ѫȸ°d+0Â<ôë×9…zèoJüî×àíKG Sˆí ¨·0Öxôã*$ŠÕ¯·±€ðÅvµŽÚ%F†Ô&};ûûç–fDØîÕZ9rÊœíšek|E@Q¼å+k(Ò0ƒ S)Ž›kÆså<´á¡Ä„]`þäS":p­“T³ü¬_©\ð\]üFºŸ/AV®+„˦Æ\CÜb#É\ %% UN+ 0ˆy UN 0ÑO ^ z, Ò¦ wx 4|  Ÿ Æ¡ ÆgÆ-Æó m¹NÐ 0ÅÒ 0D—EÛ 0³Ý 0­ 0§= 0¡ä 0›… 0•   1uµ 72***************b\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\ 1eddddddddddddd 0ëÉÉÉÉ B´´ 0¤Ñ D5u D-ª 0K×× AS"Æu 0¤; 0Dß A«#˜\\IB01S08\KNOXCLERK3ÈÈ,,,,ÈÈ0»(ÖÃ9 Z‹6Times New Roman Regular(`£ª$¡¡Ñ€.ÑÑ8€½­»»d»»d8ÑÑ ý ÑÓ  Ó(í€"  Z6Times New Roman Regular*GG ÿÿ(_16Ó ¨ý ÓÓ ° ÓÓ/%` ` ¸ hÀpÈ xÐ /ÓÔ2ÔÔ3  Ô€Ó/%` ` ¸ hÀpÈ xÐ /ÓÓ ¨ý ÓÓ ° Ó;™T1Þ  ˜C:\PROGRA~1\COREL\WORDPE~1\TEMPLATE\CUSTOM~1\REVISE~1.WPTC:\Program Files\Corel\WordPerfect Office 2000\Template\Custom WP Templates\revised standard opinion.wptóbï.3|xLevel 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5‚Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5„Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5…Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5ÿU‹ÿÀÀÀ*AA ÿÿ(_17Ó  ÓÓ5+° °` ¸ hÀpÈ xÐ 5ÓÔ2ÔÔ3  Ô€Ó5+° °` ¸ hÀpÈ xÐ 5ÓÓ  Ó(#Ã$òòÚ  Ú0Ú  Úóó*88 ÿÿ(_15Ó  ÓÓ,"¸ ¸ hÀpÈ xÐ ,ÓÔ2ÔÔ3  Ô€Ó,"¸ ¸ hÀpÈ xÐ ,ÓÓ  Ó*55 ÿÿ(_14Ó ` ÓÓ) hÀpÈ xÐ )ÓÔ2ÔÔ3  Ô€Ó) hÀpÈ xÐ )ÓÓ ` Ó*22 ÿÿ(_13Ó ¸ ÓÓ&hhÀpÈ xÐ &ÓÔ2ÔÔ3  Ô€Ó&hhÀpÈ xÐ &ÓÓ ¸ Ó*// ÿÿ(_12Ó  ÓÓ#ÀÀpÈ xÐ #ÓÔ2ÔÔ3  Ô€Ó#ÀÀpÈ xÐ #ÓÓ  Ó*,, ÿÿ(_11Ó h ÓÓ pÈ xÐ ÓÔ2ÔÔ3  Ô€Ó pÈ xÐ ÓÓ h Ó*)) ÿÿ(_10Ó À ÓÓppÈ xÐ ÓÔ2ÔÔ3  Ô€ÓppÈ xÐ ÓÓ À Ó3#37=CIQYag­­1.a.i.(1)(a)(i)1)a)i)- ù- ÿÿ35;AGMSY_11.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.(|G2M$¤¤Ý ƒ£ª!ÝÑ€.ÑÑ8€Yñ»»dd8ÑÑ ý ÑÓ  ÓÝ  Ýà  àòòÚ  Ú0Ú  ÚóóÔ€ôó9ò»»Ô d(|3‡”$££Ý ƒ£ª!ÝÑ€.ÑÑ8€Yñ»»dd8ÑÑ ý ÑÓ  ÓÝ  ÝVVVV)ÿÿ!dxdx)!ÈÈÈÈdxdx( ±þ$’’ò òFigure€Ú  Ú1Ú  Úó ó^_X`YEþÿ<<CÿÿƒLevel 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5(|3‡”$¢¢Ý ƒ£ª!ÝÑ€.ÑÑ8€Yñ»»dd8ÑÑ ý ÑÓ  ÓÝ  Ý($$””ò òÚ  Ú1Ú  Úó óX[Z&OLE 2.0 Box <=8ÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿCÿÿ HKKKKÝ ƒ£ª!ÝÑ€.ÑÑ8€Yñ»»ddÈ8ÑÑ ý ÑÓ  ÓÝ  ÝÔ_ÔÑ  ÑÑ  ÑÔ€¼Yñ»»»ÔÑ8€-XXdì»»d8Ñà@ttìàÔ‡î]ÀYñÔIN€THE€COURT€OF€CRIMINAL€APPEALS€OF€TENNESSEEˆÐ ° Ðà@WW$ìàAT€KNOXVILLEÔ#†¼Yñ»îî]À #ԈРÖ& ÐÓ  ÓJuly€27,€2004€SessionÐ üL ÐÔ‡X-X»¼YñÔÌò òÔ#†¼Yñ»XX-û#ÔSTATE€OF€TENNESSEE€v.€ANDREW€JOHN€Ô_ÔBELLAMYÔ_ÔòòóóÔ‡X-X»¼YñÔó óÐ úJ ÐÌà@@½½ìàò òAppeal€from€the€Criminal€Court€for€Sullivan€CountyÐ ú J Ðà@@øøìàNo.€S45,958€€€€€Phyllis€H.€Miller,€JudgeÐ æ 6 ÐÌÌà@@ìì*ìàßA€V) °°` d€÷E<©` AßÐ ªú  ÐÌà@@TTìàNo.€E2003„02728„CCA„R3„CD€„€Filed€October€20,€Ô_Ô2004Ô_ÔÐ ¥õ  ÐÌßA€V) °°` dE<|` AßÐ }Í  Ðó óÌÓ  ÓÔ‡X-XXX-ÔThe€appellant,€Andrew€John€Ô_ÔBellamyÔ_Ô,€pled€guilty€to€driving€on€a€revoked€license€and€third€offenseÐ xÈ  ÐÔ_ÔDUIÔ_Ô€and€reserved,€with€the€consent€of€the€State€and€the€court,€the€right€to€appeal€a€certified€questionÐ d´ Ðof€law€that€is€Ô_ÔdispositiveÔ_Ô€of€the€case.€€The€certified€question€of€law€relates€to€whether€the€trial€courtÐ P  Ðwas€correct€in€overruling€the€appellantððs€motion€to€suppress€all€the€evidence€introduced€against€theÐ <Œ Ðappellant€because€of€an€allegedly€illegal€stop€of€his€vehicle.€€For€the€following€reasons,€we€affirmÐ (x Ðthe€judgment€of€the€trial€court.Ð d ÐÔ#†X-XXX-¾#ÔÔ#†¼Yñ»XX-#ÔÔ‡X-X»¼YñÔÓ²ÓÌò òTenn.€R.€App.€P.€3€Appeal€as€of€Right;€Judgment€of€the€Trial€Court€is€Affirmed.Ð ì< Ðó óÌòòÓ  ÓÔ#†¼Yñ»àX-#ÔÔ‡X-X.¼YñÔJerry€L.€Smith,€J.óó,€delivered€the€opinion€of€the€court,€in€which€òòDavid€H.€Welles,€J.,€óójoined€andÐ Ä ÐòòJames€Ô_ÔCurwoodÔ_Ô€Ô_ÔWittÔ_Ô,€Jr.óó,€J.,€not€participating.Ð ° ÐÌKenneth€F.€Irvine,€Jr.,€Knoxville,€Tennessee,€for€the€appellant,€Andrew€John€Ô_ÔBellamyÔ_Ô.Ð ˆØ ÐÌPaul€G.€Summers,€Attorney€General€&€Reporter;€Kathy€D.€Ô_ÔAslingerÔ_Ô,€Assistant€Attorney€General;Ð `° ÐGreeley€Wells,€District€Attorney€General;€and€William€Ô_ÔCrabtreeÔ_Ô,€Assistant€District€Attorney€General,€Ð L œ Ðfor€the€appellee,€State€of€Tennessee.Ð 8!ˆ  ÐÔ#†¼Yñ»XX-ê#ÔÔ‡X-X»¼YñÔÌÌÌÓ»Óà@@OO&ìàò òOPINIONó óÔ#†¼Yñ»XX-% #ÔÔ‡X-X»¼YñÔÐ è$8 $ ÐÌòòóóÔ#†¼Yñ»XX-™ #ÔÓ  Óò òòòÔ‡¼Yñ»»¼YñÔà@ÈÈ!ìàóóó óà@@ÈÈ!ìàÔ€X-X»¼YñÔòòFactual€BackgroundóóˆÐ À&"& ÐÌà  àOn€May€19,€2001,€Officer€Keith€Feathers€of€the€Bristol€Police€Department€was€working€theÐ ˜(è#( Ðevening€shift€when€he€received€a€telephone€call€from€his€cousin,€Todd€Martin,€an€Assistant€DistrictÐ „)Ô$) ÐAttorney€General.€€General€Martin€informed€Officer€Feathers€that€the€appellant€was€driving€a€redÐ p*À%* ÐMercedes€sports€car€with€a€black€top€and€that€he€believed€the€appellant€was€driving€on€a€revokedÐ \+¬&+ Ðlicense.€€During€the€telephone€conversation,€General€Martin€provided€Officer€Feathers€with€aÐ H,˜', Ðdetailed€description€and€the€license€number€of€the€vehicle.€€When€Officer€Feathers€subsequentlyÐ 4-„(-ýú ÐÔ_Ôchecked€this€information,€he€confirmed€that€the€appellantððs€driverððs€license€had€been€revoked.€€AtÐ ° Ðthat€point,€Officer€Feathers€informed€other€officers€over€the€radio€to€be€on€the€lookout€for€the€redÐ œì Ðsports€car.€€€Ð ˆØ ÐÌà  àSometime€later€that€evening,€Officer€Feathers€received€another€telephone€call€from€GeneralÐ `° ÐMartin,€who€stated€that€he€had€gone€to€a€wedding€reception€at€the€Holiday€Inn€in€Bristol,€VirginiaÐ L œ Ðand€that€the€appellant€was€present.€€Around€10:30€that€night,€Officer€Feathers€contacted€the€Bristol,Ð 8 ˆ ÐVirginia€police€department€and€confirmed€that€the€appellantððs€car€was€still€at€the€Holiday€Inn.€€Ð $ t ÐÌà  àBetween€the€hours€of€11:00€p.m.€and€midnight,€Officer€Feathers€was€in€the€area€of€HolidayÐ ü L  ÐDrive€and€Highway€11„W€in€Bristol,€Tennessee,€when€he€observed€a€ð ðred€sports€car€at€a€high€rateÐ è 8  Ðof€speed€going€towards€Kingsport.ðð€€The€car€appeared€to€be€traveling€much€faster€than€the€postedÐ Ô$  Ðspeed€limit€of€55€miles€per€hour.€€Holiday€Drive€is€approximately€one„half€of€a€mile€inside€the€cityÐ À  Ðlimits€of€Bristol.€€Ð ¬ü  ÐÌà  àOfficer€Feathers€immediately€turned€around€and€attempted€to€catch€up€to€the€vehicle.€€He€lostÐ „Ô  Ðsight€of€the€vehicle€momentarily,€but€caught€up€to€the€vehicle€near€a€Conoco€gas€station€on€HighwayÐ pÀ Ð11„W,€which€is€approximately€one„half€mile€outside€the€Bristol€city€limits.€€According€to€OfficerÐ \¬ ÐFeathers,€he€had€to€drive€at€ð ðwell€over€a€hundred€miles€an€hourðð€in€order€to€catch€up€to€the€vehicle.€Ð H˜ ÐBy€the€time€he€caught€up€to€the€vehicle,€it€was€traveling€at€least€80€miles€per€hour.€€He€realized€atÐ 4„ Ðthat€point€that€the€tag€number€matched€that€of€the€appellantððs€vehicle€that€had€been€provided€earlierÐ  p Ðby€General€Martin.€€After€following€the€appellant€for€a€short€while,€Officer€Feathers€noted€that€theÐ  \ Ðappellant€changed€lanes€several€times€and€crossed€over€the€right€line€twice.€€Officer€FeathersÐ øH Ðactivated€his€onboard€camera€and€his€blue€lights.€€He€was€approximately€a€mile€to€a€mile„and„a„halfÐ ä4 Ðoutside€the€city€limits€at€that€time.€€The€appellant€stopped€his€vehicle€about€three„quarters€of€a€mileÐ Ð  Ðlater,€approximately€2.2€miles€outside€the€city€limits.€€Ð ¼  ÐÌà  àWhen€the€vehicle€stopped,€Officer€Feathers€approached€the€vehicle€and€asked€the€appellantÐ ”ä Ðfor€his€driverððs€license€and€registration.€€The€appellant€produced€a€restricted€license€and€stated€thatÐ €Ð Ðit€was€restricted€because€he€had€to€wear€glasses.€€Officer€Feathers€noted€that€the€appellant€was€ð ðslowÐ l¼ Ðto€answer€questions€and€he€spoke€with€a€thick€tongueðð€and€had€an€ð ðodor€of€alcoholic€beverage€aboutÐ X ¨ Ðhis€person.ðð€€Officer€Feathers€called€into€dispatch€and€discovered€that€the€appellantððs€license€wasÐ D!” Ðrevoked€due€to€a€prior€DUI.€€Ð 0"€  ÐÌà  àOfficer€Danny€Farmer€joined€Officer€Feathers€at€the€scene€and€administered€several€fieldÐ $X" Ðsobriety€tasks€to€the€appellant.€€After€attempting€two€tasks,€the€appellant€claimed€that€he€thought€heÐ ô$D # Ðwas€having€a€heart€attack,€so€the€officers€called€for€an€ambulance.€€When€the€ambulance€arrived,€theÐ à%0!$ Ðappellant€was€transported€to€Bristol€Regional€Medical€Center.€€Ð Ì&"% ÐÌà  àOn€March€27,€2002,€a€three€count€indictment€was€returned€against€the€appellant€by€a€SullivanÐ ¤(ô#' ÐCounty€Grand€Jury.€€The€appellant€was€charged€with€DUI,€driving€on€a€revoked€license€and€DUI€fifthÐ )à$( Ðoffense.€€Ð |*Ì%) ÐÐ h+¸&* Ðà  àThe€appellant€subsequently€filed€a€motion€to€suppress€the€evidence€gathered€as€a€result€of€theÐ ° Ðwarrantless€seizure€of€his€automobile,€arguing€that€the€Bristol€police€were€without€jurisdiction€toÐ œì Ðstop€the€appellant€because€they€were€outside€the€Bristol€city€limits€when€the€stop€occurred.€€The€trialÐ ˆØ Ðcourt€held€a€hearing€and€ultimately€denied€the€motion€to€suppress.€€Ð tÄ ÐÌà  àThe€appellant€pled€guilty€to€driving€on€a€revoked€license€and€third€offense€DUI,€explicitlyÐ L œ Ðreserving€the€right€to€appeal€a€certified€question€of€law.€€The€appellant€summarized€the€certifiedÐ 8 ˆ Ðquestion€of€law€in€the€trial€court€as€follows:Ð $ t ÐÌà8  à[The€appellant]€is€specifically€reserving€the€question€of€whether€this€CourtÐ ü L  Ðerroneously€denied€his€motion€to€suppress€all€the€evidence€gathered€as€the€result€ofÐ è 8  Ðthe€warrantless€seizure,€stop,€and€arrest€of€.€.€.€[the€appellant]€by€officers€of€theÐ Ô$  ÐBristol€Police€Department.€€The€Court,€the€State€and€the€defense€agree€that€theÐ À  Ðsuppression€issue€would€have€been€dispositive€in€these€cases.€€The€Court€andÐ ¬ü  Ðprosecution€consent€to€this€issue€being€reserved€for€appellate€review.€€Ð˜è Ð Ð  ÐÌà  àThe€appellant€filed€a€timely€notice€of€appeal€seeking€resolution€of€the€certified€question€ofÐ pÀ Ðlaw.€€Ð \¬ ÐÌòòÓ  ÓAnalysisóóÐ 4„ ÐÌÓ0&Óà  àOn€appeal,€the€appellant€claims€that€the€trial€court€erred€by€refusing€to€suppress€the€evidenceÐ  \ Ðagainst€him.€€He€argues€that€Officer€Feathers€did€not€have€the€authority€to€seize€his€vehicle€becauseÐ øH Ðhe€was€a€Bristol€Police€Officer€and€the€seizure€occurred€outside€the€Bristol€city€limits.€€Specifically,Ð ä4 Ðhe€reasons€that€because€Officer€Feathers€did€not€initiate€the€ð ðinvestigationðð€of€his€vehicle€until€heÐ Ð  Ðwas€over€one€mile€outside€the€city€limits€of€Bristol,€he€lacked€the€jurisdiction€to€seize€the€vehicle,Ð ¼  Ðand,€accordingly,€the€seizure€of€the€vehicle€was€illegal.€€The€State€counters€that€the€trial€court€did€notÐ ¨ø Ðerr€in€denying€the€motion€to€suppress.€€Ð ”ä ÐÌà  àThe€authority€granted€to€city€police€officers€is€enumerated€in€Tennessee€Code€AnnotatedÐ l¼ Ðsection€6„54„301,€which€provides€that€the€ð ðpolice€authorityðð€extends€to€a€ð ðdistance€of€one€mile€fromÐ X ¨ Ðthe€lawful€corporate€limits€.€.€.€for€the€suppression€of€all€disorderly€acts€and€practices€forbidden€byÐ D!” Ðthe€general€laws€of€the€state.ðð€€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€6„54„301.€€In€the€case€herein,€the€appellant€arguesÐ 0"€  Ðthat€because€Officer€Feathers€did€not€initiate€the€stop€of€his€vehicle€until€he€was€over€one€mileÐ #l! Ðoutside€the€city€limits€of€Bristol,€he€lacked€the€jurisdiction€to€seize€his€vehicle€and,€thus,€anyÐ $X" Ðevidence€obtained€as€a€result€of€the€stop€was€illegal.€€Ð ô$D # ÐÌà  àIn€òòFrancis€v.€Stateóó,€498€S.W.2d€107€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.€1973),€a€case€in€which€a€police€officerÐ Ì&"% Ðpursued€a€fleeing€defendant€outside€city€limits€for€the€purpose€of€arresting€him,€this€CourtÐ ¸'#& Ðdetermined€that:€Ð ¤(ô#' ÐÌà8  àSurely€it€cannot€be€said€with€reason€that€the€authority€of€city€policemen€to€arrest€oneÐ |*Ì%) Ðcommitting€public€offenses€in€their€sight€and€presence€is€terminated€and€they€becomeÐ h+¸&* Ðhelpless€and€barred€from€arresting€such€an€offender€if€he€succeeds€in€outrunning€themÐ ° Ðto€the€city€limits,€or€to€the€one„mile€limit€prescribed€by€.€.€.€[Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€6„54„Ð œì Ð301].€€Indeed,€such€a€theory€would€require€city€police€officers€seeing€a€patentlyÐ ˆØ Ðdrunken€driver€within€the€city,€in€violation€of€a€city€ordinance€and€state€law,€toÐ tÄ Ðabandon€pursuit€at€the€one„mile€limit€and€permit€him€to€continue€and€imperil€allÐ `° Ðpersons€upon€the€highway.€€The€arms€of€municipal€law€officers€are€not€to€be€so€tied.Ð L œ ÐThe€one„mile€limit€prescribed€by€.€.€.€[Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€6„54„301]€€was€neverÐ 8 ˆ Ðintended€to€provide€sanctuary€and€freedom€from€arrest€for€criminals€who€can€outrunÐ $ t Ðthe€policemen€to€that€line.€€It€is€not€the€law€that€city€policemen€seeing€law€violationsÐ  ` Ðwithin€the€city€must€stop€their€pursuit€at€that€line€and€permit€the€fleeing€offender€toÐ ü L  Ðescape€before€their€eyes.Ðè 8 Ð Ð  ÐÌòòFrancisóó,€498€S.W.2d€at€114;€òòseeóó€òòalsoóó€òòState€v.€Gilbertóó,€751€S.W.2d€454€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.€1988)Ð À  Ð(determining€that€where€officer€was€in€pursuit€of€defendantððs€vehicle€within€his€jurisdiction,€he€wasÐ ¬ü  Ðauthorized€to€stop€the€defendant€after€his€vehicle€crossed€into€the€next€county);€Tenn.€Op.€Atty.€Gen.Ð ˜è  ÐNo.€81„340€(opining€that€a€city€policeman€in€fresh€pursuit€beyond€the€city€limits€and€one„mileÐ „Ô  Ðstatutory€limit€retains€his€status€as€a€city€policeman€when€arresting€an€offender€he€was€pursuing€andÐ pÀ Ðthat€beyond€the€statutory€authority,€the€policeman€has€the€same€authority€as€a€private€person€has€toÐ \¬ Ðarrest€a€person€committing€a€public€offense€in€his€presence,€whether€the€policeman€observed€theÐ H˜ Ðoffense€while€in€pursuit€of€the€offender€or€otherwise).€€€€€Ð 4„ ÐÌà  àMore€importantly,€perhaps,€to€the€case€herein,€our€supreme€court€and€this€Court€haveÐ  \ Ðmaintained€that€a€police€officer€may€make€a€lawful€arrest€outside€of€his€or€her€jurisdiction€under€theÐ øH Ðauthority€given€to€a€private€person€to€make€an€arrest.€€That€authority€is€proscribed€in€Tennessee€CodeÐ ä4 ÐAnnotated€section€40„7„109,€which€provides,€in€pertinent€part:Ð Ð  ÐÌà8  àA€private€person€may€arrest€another:ШøÐ Ð  Ðà8  à(1)€For€a€public€offense€committed€in€the€arresting€personððs€presence;ДäÐ Ð  Ðà8  à(2)€When€the€person€arrested€has€committed€a€felony,€although€not€in€the€arrestingÐ €Ð Ðpersonððs€presence;€orÐl¼Ð Ð  Ðà8  à(3)€When€a€felony€has€been€committed,€and€the€arresting€person€has€reasonable€causeÐ X ¨ Ðto€believe€that€the€person€arrested€committed€it.ÐD!”Ð Ð  ÐÌTenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€40„7„109(a);€òòSeeóó€òòalsoóó€òòState€v.€Johnsonóó,€661€S.W.2d€854,€858„59€(Tenn.€1983)Ð #l! Ð(determining€that€an€officer€had€authority€to€arrest€a€defendant€in€another€county€under€private€arrestÐ $X" Ðstatute€where€the€officer€had€probable€cause€to€believe€that€the€defendant€was€in€possession€of€stolenÐ ô$D # Ðguns);€òòFrancisóó,€498€S.W.2d€at€114„16.€€Ð à%0!$ ÐÌà  àIn€òòState€v.€Donnie€Alfred€Johnsonóó,€No.€02C01„9707„CC„00261,€1998€WL€464898€(Tenn.Ð ¸'#& ÐCrim.€App.€at€Jackson,€Aug.€11,€1998),€this€Court€allowed€an€officer€to€arrest€a€defendant€for€drivingÐ ¤(ô#' Ðunder€the€influence€and€possession€of€marijuana€with€intent€to€sell€or€deliver€despite€the€fact€that€theÐ )à$( Ðofficer€was€outside€his€jurisdiction€at€the€time€of€the€arrest.€€In€òòDonnie€Alfred€Johnsonóó,€a€NewÐ |*Ì%) ÐJohnsonville€Police€Officer€followed€a€vehicle€into€Benton€County,€outside€his€jurisdiction.€€AfterÐ h+¸&* Ðreporting€his€suspicion€to€a€Benton€County€law€enforcement€agency€that€the€driver€of€the€vehicle€wasÐ ° Ðdriving€while€intoxicated,€the€officer€turned€around€to€return€to€Humphreys€County.€€Shortly€afterÐ œì Ðturning€around,€the€officer€observed€a€black€Camaro€traveling€85€miles€per€hour€in€a€40„mile„per„Ð ˆØ Ðhour€zone.€€The€officer€activated€his€blue€lights€and€proceeded€to€stop€the€vehicle.€€The€defendantÐ tÄ Ðchallenged€his€seizure€on€appeal,€arguing€that€the€officer€had€no€jurisdiction€for€the€arrest.€€ThisÐ `° ÐCourt€determined,€like€in€òòJohnsonóó€and€òòFrancisóó,€that€the€officer€had€the€authority€to€arrest€theÐ L œ Ðdefendant€for€speeding€under€the€private€arrest€statute,€noting€that€a€ð ðpolice€officer€does€not€give€upÐ 8 ˆ Ðthe€right€to€act€as€a€private€citizen€when€he€is€off€duty€or€out€of€his€jurisdiction.ðð€€òòDonnie€AlfredÐ $ t ÐJohnsonóó,€1998€WL€464898,€at€*1„*2€(quoting€òòState€v.€Horace€Durhamóó,€No.€01C01„9503„CC„00056,Ð  ` Ð1995€WL€678811,€at€*2€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.€at€Nashville,€Nov.€16,€1995)).€€An€officer€simply€doesÐ ü L  Ðnot€lose€his€or€her€right€to€act€under€the€private€arrest€statute€because€the€officer€was€on€duty€andÐ è 8  Ðstated€that€he€or€she€was€acting€as€a€police€officer.€€òòDurhamóó,€1995€WL€678811,€at€*2.€€Ð Ô$  ÐÌà  àWe€conclude€that€the€appellant€herein€was€lawfully€arrested€by€the€city€policeman€evenÐ ¬ü  Ðthough€the€arrest€was€made€outside€the€officerððs€jurisdiction.€€Officer€Feathers€had€the€authority€toÐ ˜è  Ðstop€and€arrest€the€appellant€under€the€private€arrest€statute€although€when€he€made€such€an€arrest,Ð „Ô  Ðhe€acted€at€his€own€peril.€€òòSeeóó€òòid.óó€at€*2.€€From€the€facts€in€the€record€of€the€suppression€hearing,€itÐ pÀ Ðis€clear€that€the€officer€had€probable€cause€to€stop€the€appellant.€€When€Officer€Feathers€firstÐ \¬ Ðobserved€the€appellant€speeding€in€his€red€sports€car,€he€was€still€inside€the€city€limits€of€Bristol.€Ð H˜ ÐOfficer€Feathers€immediately€turned€around€and€began€to€pursue€the€vehicle,€reaching€speeds€of€overÐ 4„ Ð100€miles€per€hour€to€catch€up€with€the€appellant.€€Officer€Feathers€caught€up€with€the€vehicle€aboutÐ  p Ðone„half€mile€outside€the€city€limits,€where€the€appellant€was€traveling€approximately€80€miles€perÐ  \ Ðhour€in€a€55„mile„per„hour€zone.€€Officer€Feathers€also€had€a€reasonable€belief€that€the€appellant€wasÐ øH Ðdriving€on€a€revoked€license€and€witnessed€the€appellant€cross€the€white€line€two€times.Ð ä4 ÐÌà  àIt€is€ð ðgood€public€policy€to€encourage€law€enforcement€officers€to€stop€drivers€who€appearÐ ¼  Ðto€be€intoxicated€and€who€may€be€endangering€themselves€and€the€public€regardless€of€where€theÐ ¨ø Ðofficers€observes€the€impaired€driving.ðð€€òòId.óó€€Accordingly,€we€conclude€that€the€appellant€wasÐ ”ä Ðlawfully€stopped€by€the€officer€and€that€the€trial€court€was€correct€in€overruling€the€appellantððsÐ €Ð Ðmotion€to€suppress€the€evidence€gathered€as€a€result€thereof.€Ð l¼ ÐÌòòÓ  ÓConclusionóóÐ D!” ÐÓ LÓÌà  àFor€the€foregoing€reasons,€the€judgment€of€the€trial€court€is€affirmed.€€Ð #l! ÐÌà  àÔ#†X-XXX- #ÔÔ‡X-XXX-ÔÌÔ#†X-XXX-âL#ÔÔ‡X-XXX-ÔÌÔ#†X-XXX-%M#Ôà  àà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  à___________________________________€Ð Ì&"% Ðà  àà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  àJERRY€L.€SMITH,€JUDGE