ÿWPCÎ \o  8«}©Ï7Ùm-ñ  ï}ðÏlþŒIy’ü õž LŠw…°G›9BíR•k™³I¡h¥¶¶ ±y €¦¬ó"«­јÒågþ§%ùÞU´^åcÑY«bHsŸ7MX]‚×BPã` Y¤õt€ê'å!•±õ´š3Åŵ¹cXÕc0 Ø`kî{­ÂS¿ƒnú Ís¼„¸Õ´„ÃQXH8·^ýîy:µbl? AFÀíø~F”Õw„¥vú âËí}íË)Ø c_2Žõv@Ÿ,™œdžm®Y{Cœ¦" Ngær4Eß +«…ÿ;‡[¼6õ3§EÑñ|¢Ô«èe Säs@±\Ü4¥$% e^·Ž“/F4ž«Éè$M‹%ÈVüΩ2 ^âf1—èÊÔÂ`BõÂTÄLÜ)Ø[ö›ÓˆSÁXë'ºœ‚©y‚¹žÊY R»†Arˆ`et{â_T7é€üe=›^ñM+œ„§„§o¤)%Æž?ÒxX0ãrBϺ 4/í\+‚5 :D͉ ž$n¸L&aÚß±`&fٽݷCtÔG È _+éÂÇ=ÁMï_ߨW_(xcíë‚DÌÏ»¡,LÓ*¤¬ƒò£¤Oíüß¼b#É\ %% UN+ 0ˆy UN 0ÑO ^ z, Ò¦ wx 4|  Ÿ Æ¡ ÆgÆ-Æó m¹NÐ 0ÅÒ 0D—EÛ 0³Ý 0­ 0§= 0¡ä 0›… 0•   1uµ 72***************b\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\ 1eddddddddddddd 0ëÉÉÉÉ B´´ 0¤Ñ D5u D-ª 0K×× AS"Æu 0¤; 0Dß A«#˜\\IB01S08\KNOXCLERK3ÈÈ,,,,ÈÈ0»(ÖÃ9 Z‹6Times New Roman Regular(`£ª$¡¡Ñ€.ÑÑ8€½­»»d»»d8ÑÑ ý ÑÓ  Ó(í€"  Z6Times New Roman Regular*GG ÿÿ(_16Ó ¨ý ÓÓ ° ÓÓ/%` ` ¸ hÀpÈ xÐ /ÓÔ2ÔÔ3  Ô€Ó/%` ` ¸ hÀpÈ xÐ /ÓÓ ¨ý ÓÓ ° Ó–€1Ï  ˜C:\PROGRA~1\COREL\WORDPE~1\TEMPLATE\CUSTOM~1\REVISE~1.WPTC:\Program Files\Corel\WordPerfect Office 2000\Template\Custom WP Templates\revised standard opinion.wptóbï.3|xLevel 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5‚Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5„Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5…Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5ÿU‹ÿÀÀÀ *AA ÿÿ(_17Ó  ÓÓ5+° °` ¸ hÀpÈ xÐ 5ÓÔ2ÔÔ3  Ô€Ó5+° °` ¸ hÀpÈ xÐ 5ÓÓ  Ó(#Ã$òòÚ  Ú0Ú  Úóó*88 ÿÿ(_15Ó  ÓÓ,"¸ ¸ hÀpÈ xÐ ,ÓÔ2ÔÔ3  Ô€Ó,"¸ ¸ hÀpÈ xÐ ,ÓÓ  Ó*55 ÿÿ(_14Ó ` ÓÓ) hÀpÈ xÐ )ÓÔ2ÔÔ3  Ô€Ó) hÀpÈ xÐ )ÓÓ ` Ó*22 ÿÿ(_13Ó ¸ ÓÓ&hhÀpÈ xÐ &ÓÔ2ÔÔ3  Ô€Ó&hhÀpÈ xÐ &ÓÓ ¸ Ó*// ÿÿ(_12Ó  ÓÓ#ÀÀpÈ xÐ #ÓÔ2ÔÔ3  Ô€Ó#ÀÀpÈ xÐ #ÓÓ  Ó*,, ÿÿ(_11Ó h ÓÓ pÈ xÐ ÓÔ2ÔÔ3  Ô€Ó pÈ xÐ ÓÓ h Ó*)) ÿÿ(_10Ó À ÓÓppÈ xÐ ÓÔ2ÔÔ3  Ô€ÓppÈ xÐ ÓÓ À Ó3#37=CIQYag­­1.a.i.(1)(a)(i)1)a)i)- ù- ÿÿ35;AGMSY_11.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.(|G2ÐÛ$¤¤Ý ƒ£ª!ÝÑ€.ÑÑ8€Wñ»»dd8ÑÑ ý ÑÓ  ÓÝ  Ýà  àòòÚ  Ú0Ú  ÚóóÔ€ôíáò»»Ô d(|3”$££Ý ƒ£ª!ÝÑ€.ÑÑ8€Wñ»»dd8ÑÑ ý ÑÓ  ÓÝ  ÝVVVV)ÿÿ!dxdx)!ÈÈÈÈdxdx( ±þ$’’ò òFigure€Ú  Ú1Ú  Úó ó^_X`YEþÿ<<CÿÿƒLevel 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5(|3”$¢¢Ý ƒ£ª!ÝÑ€.ÑÑ8€Wñ»»dd8ÑÑ ý ÑÓ  ÓÝ  Ý($$””ò òÚ  Ú1Ú  Úó óX[Z&OLE 2.0 Box <=8ÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿCÿÿ HKKKKÝ ƒ£ª!ÝÑ€.ÑÑ8€Wñ»»ddÈ8ÑÑ ý ÑÓ  ÓÝ  ÝÔ_ÔÑ  ÑÑ  ÑÔ€¼Wñ»»»ÔÑ8€åXXdì»»d8Ñà@ttìàÔ‡îTÈWñÔIN€THE€COURT€OF€CRIMINAL€APPEALS€OF€TENNESSEEˆÐ ° Ðà@WW$ìàAT€KNOXVILLEÔ#†¼Wñ»îîTÈ #ԈРÖ& ÐÓ  ÓAssigned€on€Briefs€July€28,€2004Ð üL ÐÔ‡XåX»¼WñÔÌò òÔ#†¼Wñ»XXå#ÔSTATE€OF€TENNESSEEòòóóÔ‡XåX»¼WñÔó ó€Ô#†¼Wñ»XXåd#Ôò òv.€DAVID€LEE€Ô_ÔBELLAMYÔ_Ôó óÐ úJ ÐÌà@@½½ìàò òÔ€XåX»¼WñÔAppeal€from€the€Criminal€Court€for€Sullivan€CountyÐ  p Ðà@@øøìàNo.€S47,546€€€€€R.€Jerry€Beck,€JudgeÐ  \ ÐÌÌà@@ìì*ìàßA€V) °°` d€÷E<Ï` AßÐ Ð  ÐÌà@@TTìàNo.€E2003„02936„CCA„R3„CD„€Filed€August€31,€Ô_Ô2004Ô_ÔÐ Ë  ÐÌßA€V) °°` dE<¢` AßÐ £ó  Ðó óÌÓ  ÓÔ‡XåXXXåÔThe€appellant,€David€Lee€Ô_ÔBellamyÔ_Ô,€plead€guilty€to€violation€of€an€habitual€traffic€offender€order,€twoÐ žî  Ðcounts€of€reckless€aggravated€assault,€four€counts€of€reckless€endangerment,€driving€under€theÐ ŠÚ Ðinfluence,€driving€under€the€influence,€fourth€offense,€improper€passing,€and€driving€left€of€center,Ð vÆ Ðwith€the€sentence€to€be€determined€by€the€trial€court.€€After€a€sentencing€hearing,€the€trial€courtÐ b² Ðsentenced€the€appellant€to€an€effective€sentence€of€twelve€years.€€Unsatisfied€with€the€denial€ofÐ Nž Ðalternative€sentencing,€the€appellant€now€appeals.€€We€affirm€the€judgment€of€the€trial€court.€€Ð :Š ÐÔ#†XåXXXå #ÔÓýÓÌò òTenn.€R.€App.€P.€3€Appeal€as€of€Right;€Judgment€of€the€Trial€Court€is€AffirmedÐ b Ðó óÌòòÓ  ÓJerry€L.€Smith,€J.óó,€delivered€the€opinion€of€the€court,€in€which€òòDavid€H.€Welles,óó€J.€joined€andÐ ê: ÐòòJames€Ô_ÔCurwoodÔ_Ô€Ô_ÔWittÔ_Ô,€Jr.óó,€J.,€filed€a€concurring€opinion.Ð Ö& ÐÌJulie€A.€Rice,€Knoxville,€Tennessee,€for€the€appellant,€David€Lee€Ô_ÔBellamyÔ_ÔÐ ®þ ÐÌPaul€G.€Summers,€Attorney€General€&€Reporter;€John€H.€Ô_ÔBledsoeÔ_Ô,€Assistant€Attorney€General;Ð †Ö ÐGreeley€Wells,€District€Attorney€General;€and€Rebecca€Davenport,€Assistant€District€AttorneyÐ r  ÐGeneral,€€for€the€appellant,€State€of€Tennessee.Ð ^!®  ÐÌÓ´Óà@@OO&ìàò òOPINIONó óÐ 6#†" ÐÌòòóóÓ  Óò òòòÔ‡XåXXXåÔà@ÈÈ!ìàóóó óà@@ÈÈ!ìàòòFactual€BackgroundóóˆÐ %^ $ ÐÌà  àIn€April€of€2003,€the€Sullivan€County€Grand€Jury€issued€a€presentment€charging€the€appellantÐ æ&6"& Ðwith€eleven€counts€arising€out€of€a€multiple€vehicle€collision€that€occurred€on€March€5,€2003,€inÐ Ò'"#' ÐKingsport,€Tennessee.€€The€appellant€was€indicted€on€two€counts€of€reckless€aggravated€assault,€fourÐ ¾($( Ðcounts€of€reckless€endangerment,€driving€under€the€influence,€driving€under€the€influence,€fourthÐ ª)ú$) Ðoffense,€violation€of€a€habitual€traffic€offender€order,€improper€passing,€and€driving€left€of€center.€Ð –*æ%* ÐThe€appellant€plead€guilty€to€all€charges.€€In€conjunction€with€the€plea€agreement€the€State€agreedÐ ‚+Ò&+ Ðâ âto:€(1)€allow€the€appellant€to€be€sentenced€as€a€Range€I,€standard€offender;€(2)€not€seek€a€violationÐ n,¾',ý ÐÔ_ Ôof€probation€charge€for€the€appellantððs€existing€probation€in€General€Sessions€Court;€and€(3)€not€toÐ ° Ðseek€more€than€the€minimum€150€days€in€jail€on€the€felony€DUI€offense.€€Ð œì Ðâ âÌà  àAt€the€plea€hearing,€the€prosecutor€stated€that€if€the€case€had€gone€to€trial,€the€State€wouldÐ tÄ Ðhave€proven€that€on€March€5,€2003,€Kingsport€Police€Officer€Burke€Murray€responded€to€a€multipleÐ `° Ðvehicle€collision€on€Moreland€Drive€at€the€intersection€of€John€B.€Dennis€Highway.€€Upon€hisÐ L œ Ðarrival,€Officer€Murray€spoke€with€two€witnesses€who€explained€that€traffic€traveling€westbound€onÐ 8 ˆ ÐMoreland€Drive€was€stopped€due€to€construction€under€John€B.€Dennis€Highway.€€The€roadway€wasÐ $ t Ðshut€down€to€one€lane€and,€at€the€time€of€the€accident,€the€eastbound€traffic€was€moving€through€theÐ  ` Ðconstruction€area.€€A€maroon€Chrysler€traveling€westbound€came€around€on€the€wrong€side€of€theÐ ü L  Ðroad,€struck€a€pick„up€truck€traveling€eastbound€and€then€struck€four€other€cars€stopped€in€theÐ è 8  Ðconstruction€zone.€€The€appellant€was€identified€as€the€driver€of€the€Chrysler.€€When€Officer€MurrayÐ Ô$  Ðapproached€the€appellant,€he€had€a€strong€odor€of€alcohol€on€his€breath€and€was€very€unsteady€onÐ À  Ðhis€feet.€€The€officer€determined€that€the€appellantððs€driverððs€license€had€been€revoked€as€an€habitualÐ ¬ü  Ðoffender€in€an€order€from€Sullivan€County€dated€1989.€€The€passenger€in€the€vehicle€was€injured€andÐ ˜è  Ðalso€appeared€to€be€extremely€intoxicated.€€Neither€the€appellant€nor€the€passenger€could€rememberÐ „Ô  Ðwhat€transpired€immediately€prior€to€the€accident.€€Several€people€were€injured€in€the€collision.€€TheÐ pÀ Ðappellant€was€arrested€and€a€blood€alcohol€test€revealed€that€his€blood€alcohol€level€was€.30€at€theÐ \¬ Ðtime€of€the€accident.€Ð H˜ ÐÌà  àAfter€the€trial€court€accepted€the€plea,€a€separate€sentencing€hearing€was€held€at€which€theÐ  p Ðtrial€court€sentenced€the€appellant€to€two€years€for€the€violation€of€an€habitual€traffic€offender€order,Ð  \ Ðfour€years€for€each€of€the€two€counts€of€reckless€aggravated€assault,€two€years€for€each€of€the€fourÐ øH Ðcounts€or€reckless€endangerment,€two€years€for€the€fourth€offense€driving€under€the€influence,€thirtyÐ ä4 Ðdays€for€improper€passing,€and€thirty€days€for€driving€left€of€center.€€In€imposing€the€sentence,€theÐ Ð  Ðtrial€court€found€that€the€catch„all€mitigating€provision€of€Tennessee€Code€Annotated€section€40„35„Ð ¼  Ð113€should€apply€due€to€the€appellantððs€remorse€and€desire€to€make€restitution.€€However,€the€trialÐ ¨ø Ðcourt€found€this€mitigator€to€be€outweighed€by€the€appellantððs€prior€criminal€convictions€andÐ ”ä Ðcriminal€behavior.€€The€trial€court€found€two€multiple€offender€factors€applicable€to€the€appellantÐ €Ð Ðand€therefore€found€that€consecutive€sentencing€was€appropriate.€€The€trial€court€ordered€that€theÐ l¼ Ðtwo„year€habitual€traffic€offender€violation,€each€four„year€conviction€for€reckless€aggravated€assault,Ð X ¨ Ðand€the€four,€two„year€convictions€for€reckless€endangerment€should€run€concurrently€to€each€otherÐ D!” Ðbut€consecutively€to€the€habitual€traffic€offender€violation€and€two€reckless€aggravated€assaultÐ 0"€  Ðconvictions,€for€a€total€effective€sentence€of€twelve€years.€€All€other€charges€were€ordered€to€be€runÐ #l! Ðconcurrently.€€The€trial€court€denied€any€alternative€sentencing.€€Ð $X" ÐÌà  àThe€appellant€filed€a€timely€notice€of€appeal€in€which€he€challenges€the€trial€courtððsÐ à%0!$ Ðsentencing€determination.€€Ð Ì&"% ÐÌòòÓ  ÓSentencingóóÐ ¤(ô#' ÐÌÓ•Óà  àThe€appellant€argues€on€appeal€that€the€trial€court€erred€by€denying€him€alternativeÐ |*Ì%) Ðsentencing.€€Specifically,€he€alleges€that€the€trial€court€ignored€his€potential€for€rehabilitation€and€theÐ h+¸&* Ðpresumption€of€alternative€sentencing.€€The€appellant€does€not€challenge€the€trial€courtððs€decisionÐ ° Ðto€order€consecutive€sentences€or€the€trial€courtððs€application€of€enhancement€and€mitigating€factors.€Ð œì ÐThe€State€counters€that€the€record€reflects€that€the€trial€court€properly€sentenced€the€appellant.€€Ð ˆØ ÐÌà  àð ðWhen€reviewing€sentencing€issues€.€.€.€,€the€appellate€court€shall€conduct€a€òòdeóó€òònovoóó€reviewÐ `° Ðon€the€record€of€such€issues.€€Such€review€shall€be€conducted€with€a€presumption€that€theÐ L œ Ðdeterminations€made€by€the€court€from€which€the€appeal€is€taken€are€correct.ðð€€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ððÐ 8 ˆ Ð40-35-401(d).€€ð ðHowever,€the€presumption€of€correctness€which€accompanies€the€trial€courtððs€actionÐ $ t Ðis€conditioned€upon€the€affirmative€showing€in€the€record€that€the€trial€court€considered€theÐ  ` Ðsentencing€principles€and€all€relevant€facts€and€circumstances.ðð€€òòState€v.€Ashbyóó,€823€S.W.2d€166,Ð ü L  Ð169€(Tenn.€1991).€€In€conducting€our€review,€we€must€consider€the€defendantððs€potential€forÐ è 8  Ðrehabilitation,€the€trial€and€sentencing€hearing€evidence,€the€pre„sentence€report,€the€sentencingÐ Ô$  Ðprinciples,€sentencing€alternative€arguments,€the€nature€and€character€of€the€offense,€the€enhancingÐ À  Ðand€mitigating€factors,€and€the€defendantððs€statements.€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðððð€40-35-103(5),€-210(b);€Ð ¬ü  ÐòòAshbyóó,€823€S.W.2d€at€169.òòóó€We€are€to€also€recognize€that€the€defendant€bears€ð ðthe€burden€ofÐ ˜è  Ðdemonstrating€that€the€sentence€is€improper.ðð€òòAshbyóó,€823€S.W.2d€at€169.Ð „Ô  ÐÌà  àIn€regards€to€alternative€sentencing,€Tennessee€Code€Annotated€section€40„35„102(5)Ð \¬ Ðprovides€as€follows:Ð H˜ ÐÌà8  àIn€recognition€that€state€prison€capacities€and€the€funds€to€build€and€maintain€themÐ  p Ðare€limited,€convicted€felons€committing€the€most€severe€offenses,€possessingÐ  \ Ðcriminal€histories€evincing€a€clear€disregard€for€the€laws€and€morals€of€society,€andÐ øH Ðevincing€failure€of€past€efforts€at€rehabilitation€shall€be€given€first€priority€regardingÐ ä4 Ðsentencing€involving€incarceration€.ÐÐ Ð Ð  ÐÌà  àA€defendant€who€does€not€fall€within€this€class€of€offenders€ð ðand€who€is€an€especiallyÐ ¨ø Ðmitigated€offender€or€standard€offender€convicted€of€a€Class€C,€D,€or€E€felony€is€presumed€to€be€aÐ ”ä Ðfavorable€candidate€for€alternative€sentencing€in€the€absence€of€evidence€to€the€contrary.ðð€€òòId.óó€ðð€40„Ð €Ð Ð35„102(6).€€Furthermore,€unless€sufficient€evidence€rebuts€the€presumption,ðð[t]he€trial€court€mustÐ l¼ Ðpresume€that€a€defendant€sentenced€to€eight€years€or€less€is€an€offender€for€whom€incarcerationÐ X ¨ Ðwould€result€in€successful€rehabilitation€.€.€.€.ðð€€òòState€v.€Byrdóó,€861€S.W.2d€377,€379„80€(Tenn.€Crim.Ð D!” ÐApp.€1993);€òòseeóó€òòalsoóó€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€40„35„303(a).€€In€this€case,€the€appellant€was€convicted€of:€Ð 0"€  Ð(1)€violation€of€an€habitual€traffic€offender€order,€a€Class€E€felony;€(2)€two€counts€of€recklessÐ #l! Ðaggravated€assault,€a€Class€D€felony;€(3)€four€counts€of€reckless€endangerment,€a€Class€E€felony;€(4)Ð $X" ÐDUI,€fourth€offense,€a€Class€E€felony;€and€(5)€DUI,€a€Class€A€misdemeanor.€€As€a€Range€I,€standardÐ ô$D # Ðoffender€convicted€of€and€sentenced€to€less€than€eight€years€for€each€of€these€offenses,€the€appellantÐ à%0!$ Ðwas€eligible€for€probation.€€òòSee€idóó.€€ðððð€40„35„102(6),€40„35„303(a);€òòByrdóó,€861€S.W.2d€at€379„80.€Ð Ì&"% ÐThe€appellantððs€effective€sentence€is€twelve€years.€€Ð ¸'#& ÐÌà  àHowever,€all€offenders€who€meet€the€criteria€are€not€entitled€to€relief;€instead,€sentencingÐ )à$( Ðissues€must€be€determined€by€the€facts€and€circumstances€of€each€case.€€òòSeeóó€òòState€v.€Tayloróó,€744Ð |*Ì%) ÐS.W.2d€919,€922€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.€1987)€(citing€òòState€v.€Mossóó,€727€S.W.2d€229,€235€(Tenn.Ð h+¸&* Ð1986)).€€Even€if€a€defendant€is€presumed€to€be€a€favorable€candidate€for€alternative€sentencing€underÐ ° ÐTennessee€Code€Annotated€ðð€40„35„102(6),€the€statutory€presumption€of€an€alternative€sentence€mayÐ œì Ðbe€overcome€ifÐ ˆØ ÐÌà8  à(A)€[c]onfinement€is€necessary€to€protect€society€by€restraining€a€defendant€who€hasÐ `° Ða€long€history€of€criminal€conduct;ÐL œÐ Ð  Ðà8  à(B)€[c]onfinement€is€necessary€to€avoid€depreciating€the€seriousness€of€the€offenseÐ 8 ˆ Ðor€confinement€is€particularly€suited€to€provide€an€effective€deterrence€to€othersÐ $ t Ðlikely€to€commit€similar€offenses;€orÐ `Ð Ð  Ðà8  à(C)€[m]easures€less€restrictive€than€confinement€have€frequently€or€recently€beenÐ ü L  Ðapplied€unsuccessfully€to€the€defendant€.€.€.€.€Ðè 8 Ð Ð  ÐÌTenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€40„35„103(1)(A)„(C).€€In€choosing€among€possible€sentencing€alternatives,€theÐ À  Ðtrial€court€should€also€consider€Tennessee€Code€Annotated€ðð€40„35„103(5),€which€states,€in€pertinentÐ ¬ü  Ðpart,€ð ð[t]he€potential€or€lack€of€potential€for€the€rehabilitation€or€treatment€of€a€defendant€should€beÐ ˜è  Ðconsidered€in€determining€the€sentence€alternative€or€length€of€a€term€to€be€imposed.ðð€€òòId.óó€ðð€40„35„Ð „Ô  Ð103(5);€òòState€v.€Dowdyóó,€894€S.W.2d€301,€305€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.€1994).€€The€trial€court€mayÐ pÀ Ðconsider€a€defendantððs€untruthfulness€and€lack€of€candor€as€they€relate€to€the€potential€forÐ \¬ Ðrehabilitation.€€òòSeeóó€òòState€v.€Nunleyóó,€22€S.W.3d€282,€289€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.€1999);€òòseeóó€òòalsoóó€òòState€v.Ð H˜ ÐBunchóó,€646€S.W.2d€158,€160„61€(Tenn.€1983);€òòState€v.€Zeoliaóó,€928€S.W.2d€457,€463€(Tenn.€Crim.Ð 4„ ÐApp.€1996);€òòState€v.€Williamsonóó,€919€S.W.2d€69,€84€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.€1995);€òòState€v.€Dowdyóó,€894Ð  p ÐS.W.2d€at€305„06.€€Ð  \ ÐÌà  àIn€the€case€herein,€the€trial€court€held€a€rather€lengthy€sentencing€hearing€in€which€theÐ ä4 Ðappellant€testified.€€The€trial€court€learned€through€the€appellantððs€testimony€and€the€pre„sentenceÐ Ð  Ðreport€that€the€appellant€had€a€long€history€of€criminal€conduct.€€The€appellantððs€criminal€recordÐ ¼  Ðcontained€seven€DUI€offenses,€fourteen€public€intoxication€charges,€one€habitual€traffic€offenderÐ ¨ø Ðviolation,€three€assault€and€battery€offenses,€three€disorderly€conducts,€four€resisting€arrests,€oneÐ ”ä Ðfalse€report€offense,€six€driving€on€a€revoked€license€charges,€one€helmet€law€violation,€oneÐ €Ð Ðdestruction€of€property,€one€failure€to€yield,€one€failure€to€stop€at€the€scene€of€an€accident,€oneÐ l¼ Ðpossession€of€an€open€beer€container,€and€one€burglary€of€an€automobile€offense.€€The€appellantÐ X ¨ Ðadmitted€that€all€of€his€problems€with€the€law€stemmed€from€his€alcohol€use€and€abuse€but€expressedÐ D!” Ðserious€remorse€for€his€actions.€€Ð 0"€  ÐÌà  àThe€trial€court€recognized€that€the€appellant€was€presumptively€eligible€for€probation€or€someÐ $X" Ðother€form€of€alternative€sentencing.€€However,€the€trial€court€denied€alternative€sentencing€andÐ ô$D # Ðcommented:€€Ð à%0!$ ÐÌà8  àNow€as€to€probation,€although€heððs€received€a€considerable€sentence,€the€court€stillÐ ¸'#& Ðhas€to€address€the€probation€issue.€€Although€he€has€the€presumption€of€probation,Ð ¤(ô#' Ðagain,€relying€upon€the€sentence,€the€1989€Criminal€Sentence€Reform€Act€factors,€IððllÐ )à$( Ðtry€not€to€read€it€in,€when€I€counted€them€up€thereððs€probably€thirty„four€(34)€of€them,Ð |*Ì%) Ðbut€basically€the€defendant€has€a€terrible€record,€prior€attempts€at€rehabilitation€haveÐ h+¸&* Ðbeen€tried,€which€is€set€out€in€the€presentence€report.€€The€„€„€in€addition,€theÐ ° Ðdefendant€has€previously€been€referred€to€Frontier.€€It€was€described€as€Frontier.€€TheÐ œì ÐCourt€recognizes€that€to€be€Frontier€Mental€Health,€which€is€the€court„approvedÐ ˆØ Ðtreatment€resource€that€the€Sessions€Court€uses€and€this€Court.€€Heððs€been€thereÐ tÄ Ðbefore,€has€not€been€successful.€€I€think€specifically€heððs€been€on,€put€on€probationÐ `° Ðor€parts€of€his€sentence€have€been€put€on€probation€previously.€€Itððs€not€deterred€inÐ L œ Ðthe€least€his€criminal€activity,€which€is€basically€a€lifetime€situation.€€I€think€thatÐ 8 ˆ Ðoutweighs€any€favorable€factors€and€there€are€favorable€factors€that€favor€probationÐ $ t Ðin€proper€circumstances.Ð `Ð Ð  ÐÌà8  àà ` àThe€defendant€probably,€except€when€heððs€drunk,€seems€to€be,€according€toÐ è 8  Ðhis€family€members,€a€nice€guy.€€He€probably€is€and€he€has€attempted€to€work€andÐ Ô$  Ðheððs€held€construction€jobs€mainly.€€ÐÀ Ð Ð  ÐÌà8  àà ` àNow,€as€to€residential€community€corrections,€this€„€„€he€suggested€that€whenÐ ˜è  Ðhe€testified€that€he€would€be€an€appropriate€candidate.€€Probably€the€reason€theÐ „Ô  Ðattorney€urged€it€on€the€Court€through€questioning€of€the€defendant€was€because€[of]Ð pÀ Ðspecial€needs€where€a€person€might€not€otherwise€be€eligible€for€probation,€can€beÐ \¬ Ðplaced€in€a€residential,€in€a€community€corrections.€€We€have€in€this€county,€sort€ofÐ H˜ Ðunique€to€this€county,€a€residential€community€corrections€called€Hay€House.€€But€theÐ 4„ ÐCourt€„€„€it€does€not€seem€it€would€be€appropriate€considering€prior€efforts€atÐ  p Ðrehabilitation,€prior€efforts€to€get€a€hold€of€the€alcohol€problem€have€no[t]€beenÐ  \ Ðsuccessful.€€The€Court€sees€no€hope€that€the€community€or€the€defendant€wouldÐ øH Ðbenefit€from€a€community€corrections€sentence€under€special€needs€concepts.€€€Ðä4Ð Ð  ÐÌà  àWe€conclude€that€the€trial€court€did€not€err€in€denying€alternative€sentencing.€€The€appellantððsÐ ¼  Ðactions€resulted€in€a€multiple€vehicle€collision€when€his€car€crossed€over€to€the€wrong€side€of€theÐ ¨ø Ðroad€and€struck€a€pick„up€truck€and€four€other€cars€stopped€in€a€construction€area.€€Several€peopleÐ ”ä Ðwere€injured,€including€the€passenger€in€the€vehicle€the€appellant€was€driving.€€At€the€time€of€theÐ €Ð Ðaccident,€the€appellant€was€driving€on€a€revoked€license€and€had€a€.30€blood€alcohol€level.€€€Further,Ð l¼ Ðrehabilitation€of€the€appellant€through€measures€less€restrictive€than€confinement€in€the€past€haveÐ X ¨ Ðbeen€unsuccessful.€€He€attended€a€twelve€week€outpatient€program€at€Frontier€Mental€Health,€hasÐ D!” Ðattended€DUI€classes€and€AA€meetings.€€Sadly,€it€appears€that€the€previous€treatment€attempts€haveÐ 0"€  Ðfailed.€€The€appellantððs€long€criminal€history€indicates€that€he€has€failed€numerous€times€to€receiveÐ #l! Ðtreatment€for€his€alcoholism€and€abide€by€the€law.€€The€appellant€has€failed€to€demonstrate€that€theÐ $X" Ðtrial€courtððs€denial€of€alternative€sentencing€is€improper.€€The€evidence€does€not€preponderate€againstÐ ô$D # Ðthe€trial€courtððs€sentencing€determination.€€Accordingly,€the€judgment€of€the€trial€court€is€affirmed.€Ð à%0!$ Ðà  àà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àÌÌÌÌÌÐ h+¸&* ЇÌòòÓ  ÓConclusionóóÐ œì ÐÓ÷PÓÌà  àFor€the€foregoing€reasons,€the€judgment€of€the€trial€court€is€affirmed.Ð tÄ Ðà  àÌÌÔ#†XåXXXåó #ÔÔ‡XåXXXåÔÌÔ#†XåXXXåÏQ#ÔÔ‡XåXXXåÔÌÔ#†XåXXXåR#ÔÔ‡XåXXXåÔÌÔ#†XåXXXåUR#Ôà  àà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  à___________________________________€Ð ü L  Ðà  àà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  àJERRY€L.€SMITH,€JUDGE