ÿWPCÎ  8Hb…¦)縄°ËÙI±yW SÖ–†­°¹Ü›£úWÛsŸ”Œç¶ˆ›YxúÕ‚QrwdÌþðç+õ½óõ5XЋä,ç¬ÁKÅžH«ŸÏ’»ÜeZ•••Ñçw~ê–µ/–áŒí´˜qþ‡âœ?I}Ä?)Í¥_ÚS”Ø70-\¶ìˆÎìi+L<îbvø1Ìy¿:ßØÌ*ráîàWÄB(ƒq[¾=ušt´ù ÆVŒdêPyP]ÐýÕÒÓXü.!Q§³ž‡IØ’®¾…¸¢ÈiMšPg×ÿ¤Ëc-Hwôy]ð³Ð ö‚1«{@²—³›,|c^Å9q“äüüWv_oETì¬9ëUÖIÙó.A`2‡þ]æèÖ´$„0õˆ\¹O»gî$¦2[šýäŒ92“¼‘6àÌcDì'Õhj­siªñk'ÄäBƒÀxMähøq¼Ä”FmœovG~r£öõàìcCÓŽ0 à ªª-!‰:…2;ÁFøšæúˆ/¼ÖR¼[æ‹Ôg†Îë±Hòbu¹?ñðgᾬO‚cú‹Ç<ðº’äP 08vjÎJèT7!eq1n³¼H%ôÖþ×B®q[%ŸÑ³ùbJ¶HnŠW#ÁÂUNƒ %Ñ 0:×^  w 4! 5 D mF b] U @e e ¥ N­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ E¯ ¯ ¯ ¯ ¯ ¯ ¯ ¯ ¯ ¯ ¯ ¯ ¯ ¯ ¯ ¯ ¯ ¯ ¯ ¯ ¯ ¯ ¯ ¯ ¯ ¯ ¯ ¯ ¯ ¯ ¯ ¯ ¯ ¯ ¯ ¯ ¯ ¯ ¯ ¯ ¯ ¯ ¯ ¯ ¯ ¯ ¯ ¯ ¯ ¯ ¯ ¯ ¯ ¯ ¯ ¯ ¯ ¯ ¯ ¯ ¯ ¯ ¯ ¯ B± ˜HP LaserJet 8000 Series PSØÚØÚÚØØÚ0(ÖÃ9 Z‹6Times New Roman RegularX(üœ$¡¡ÔUSUS.,Ô»d$+â òK+  8•¤3|xÿU‹ÿÀÀÀ- ù-(ÖÃ9 Z‹(Times New Roman   dÝ ƒüœ!ÝÔUSUS.,ÔÝ  ÝÔ‡ XúXXXÔÔ‡ î îX XúÔÓ  ÓÑ€ ÑÑ8€úXXdìdÈ8ÑÑ  ÑÑ  ÑIN€THE€COURT€OF€CRIMINAL€APPEALS€OF€TENNESSEEÐ ° Ðà@@kk$ìàAT€NASHVILLEÔ#† XúXî î L#ÔÔ‡ ¼<7»X XúÔÐ Ö& Ðà @ àà @` àAssigned€on€Briefs€June€20,€2001Ð üL ÐÔ#† XúX» ¼<7Z#ÔÔ‡ î îX XúÔÌò òÔ#† XúXî î þ#ÔÔ‡ ¼<7»X XúÔSTATE€OF€TENNESSEEòòóó€v.€BILLY€E.€BILESòòóóó óÐ 4 „ ÐÔ#† XúX» ¼<7D#ÔÔ‡ î îX XúÔÌò òÔ#† XúXî î Î#ÔAppeal€from€the€Circuit€Court€for€Warren€CountyÐ n ¾ Ðà@@º º ìàNo.€F„7245€€€€€€Charles€D.€Haston,€JudgeÐ Z ª ÐÌÌà@@ìì*ìàßA€V) °°` d€÷E<` AßÐ n  ÐÌà@@ººìàNo.€M1998„00650„CCA„R3„CD€„€Filed€August€31,€2001Ð i  ÐÌßA€V) °°` dE<ð` AßÐ ñA  Ðó óÓkÓÌÓ  ÓThe€Defendant,€Billy€E.€Biles,€entered€a€guilty€plea€to€one€count€of€possession€with€intent€to€sell€aÐ ì< Ðschedule€II€controlled€substance€(0.5€grams€of€cocaine)€and€one€count€of€simple€possession€ofÐ Ø( Ðmarijuana€in€the€Circuit€Court€of€Warren€County€in€case€#F„7245.€€The€Defendant€received€anÐ Ä Ðeffective€sentence€of€eight€(8)€years,€and€that€sentence€was€ordered€to€run€concurrently€withÐ ° ÐDefendantððs€sentences€in€case€#F„7289€and€#F„7317.€€The€Department€of€Correction€placed€him€inÐ œì Ðthe€boot€camp€program€for€four€months,€and€then,€effective€July€3,€1997,€the€Defendant€was€placedÐ ˆØ Ðon€probation€for€a€term€of€seven€years€and€nineteen€days.€€Pursuant€to€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€40-20-206,Ð tÄ Ðthe€Tennessee€Department€of€Correction€issued€a€Certificate€of€Probation€to€the€Defendant.€€OnÐ `° ÐOctober€3,€1997,€Defendantððs€probation€officer€filed€a€petition€to€revoke€Defendantððs€probation€andÐ Lœ Ðto€issue€a€warrant€for€his€arrest.€€Following€a€subsequent€hearing,€the€trial€court€revoked€DefendantððsÐ 8ˆ Ðprobation,€and€Defendant€challenges€that€revocation€in€this€appeal.€€After€a€review€of€the€record,€weÐ $t Ðaffirm€the€judgment€of€the€trial€court,€revoking€probation.€€However,€we€remand€to€the€trial€courtÐ ` Ðto€correct€a€clerical€error€in€the€judgment€of€Defendantððs€conviction€in€Count€I€of€Case€#F„7245.Ð üL ÐÓÕÓÌÓ  Óò òTenn.€R.€App.€P.€3€Appeal€as€of€Right;Ð Ô$ ÐJudgment€of€the€Circuit€Court€Affirmed€and€Remanded€to€Correct€a€Clerical€Error.ó óÐ À  ÐÓ ÓÌòòÓ  ÓThomas€T.€Woodall,€J.óó,€delivered€the€opinion€of€the€court,€in€which€òòDavid€G.€Hayes,€J.,óó€andÐ ˜"è! ÐòòTerry€Laffertyóó,€Sp.€J.,€joined.Ð „#Ô" ÐÌQuentin€S.€Horton,€McMinnville,€Tennessee€(on€appeal)€and€Russell€L.€Leonard,€Cowan,€TennesseeÐ \%¬ $ Ð(at€trial)€for€the€appellant,€Billy€E.€Biles.Ð H&˜!% ÐÌPaul€G.€Summers,€Attorney€General€and€Reporter;€Mark€A.€Fulks,€Assistant€Attorney€General;Ð  (p#' ÐClement€Dale€Potter,€District€Attorney€General;€Robert€W.€Boyd,€Assistant€District€AttorneyÐ  )\$( ÐGeneral,€for€the€appellant,€State€of€Tennessee.Ð ø)H%) ÐÓÇ ÓÌÌÌò òÓ  ÓOPINIONó óÐ ¨-ø(-E ÐÓvÓÓ  Óò òó óÌà  àOn€January€27,€1997,€the€Defendant€pled€guilty,€in€case€#F„7245,€to€one€count€of€possession€Ð œì Ðof€a€schedule€II€controlled€substance,€to€wit:€cocaine€in€excess€of€0.5€grams€with€intent€to€sell€orÐ ˆØ Ðdeliver,€and€one€count€of€simple€possession€of€a€schedule€VI€controlled€substance,€to€wit:€marijuana.€Ð tÄ ÐThe€judgment,€in€the€record€on€appeal,€for€case€#F„7245€shows€that€the€sentence€in€case€#F„7245Ð `° Ðwas€to€be€served€concurrently€with€Defendantððs€sentences€in€case€#F„7289€(four„year€sentence€forÐ L œ Ðsale€of€cocaine)€and€#F„7317(eight„year€sentence€for€the€sale€of€cocaine).€€After€four€months€in€bootÐ 8 ˆ Ðcamp,€the€Defendant€was€placed€on€probation€on€July€3,€1997.€Approximately€three€months€afterÐ $ t ÐDefendantððs€probation€became€effective,€a€probation€violation€warrant€was€filed€and€served€on€theÐ  ` ÐDefendant.€€The€violation€warrant€alleged€that€Defendant€had€failed€to€report€to€his€probation€officerÐ ü L  Ðin€August€and€September€1997,€and€failed€to€make€monthly€payments€to€the€drug€fund€in€August€andÐ è 8  ÐSeptember€1997.Ð Ô$  ÐÌà  àDuring€the€revocation€hearing,€Joe€Crawford,€Defendantððs€probation€officer,€testified€that€heÐ ¬ü  Ðhad€thoroughly€discussed€the€requirements€of€probation€with€the€Defendant.€€CrawfordÐ ˜è  Ðacknowledged€that€he€had€previously€served€as€the€Defendantððs€probation€officer,€in€an€unrelatedÐ „Ô  Ðcase,€and€that€he€had€to€revoke€Defendantððs€probation€in€that€case€also,€because€the€Defendant€failedÐ pÀ Ðto€comply€with€the€conditions€of€his€probation.€€Crawford€also€testified€that,€due€to€the€need€for€theÐ \¬ ÐDefendant€to€be€employed€and€to€make€monthly€payments€of€$135€to€the€drug€funds€of€WarrenÐ H˜ ÐCounty€and€the€City€of€McMinnville,€he€permitted€the€Defendant€to€work€in€Davidson€County.€Ð 4„ ÐCrawford€further€testified€that€Defendant€was€allowed€to€schedule€a€monthly€€appointment€at€anyÐ  p Ðmutually€convenient€time,€rather€than€appear€on€Crawfordððs€scheduled€days€of€the€first€and€thirdÐ  \ ÐMonday€of€each€month.€€Crawford€said€that€he€had€not€seen€or€heard€from€the€Defendant,€since€hisÐ øH Ðinitial€report€and€one€phone€call€following€Defendantððs€first€week€of€work.€€Finally,€CrawfordÐ ä4 Ðtestified€that€the€Defendant€had€failed€to€report,€and€had€failed€to€make€his€scheduled€monthlyÐ Ð  Ðpayments€in€both€August€and€September€of€1997.€€Therefore,€Crawford€stated€he€had€no€other€choiceÐ ¼  Ðbut€to€file€for€a€violation€of€probation€to€be€issued€against€the€Defendant.Ð ¨ø ÐÌà  àThe€Defendant€testified€that,€while€Crawford€explained€the€conditions€of€his€probation,€heÐ €Ð Ðthought€that€Crawford€was€not€requiring€him€to€report€monthly,€only€to€make€his€monthly€paymentsÐ l¼ Ðto€the€drug€fund.€€The€Defendant€also€testified€that€his€work€hours€in€Nashville€prevented€him€fromÐ X ¨ Ðreporting€to€Crawford€at€Crawfordððs€regularly€scheduled€appointment€times.€€He€also€said€that€heÐ D!” Ðhad€difficulty€making€the€appointments,€as€well€as€his€payments,€because€he€was€not€permitted€toÐ 0"€  Ðdrive.€€He€further€testified€that€he€had€given€$500€to€a€friend,€who€had€agreed€to€make€DefendantððsÐ #l! Ðdrug€fund€payment.€€However,€the€friend€had€forgotten€to€make€the€payment.€€The€DefendantððsÐ $X" Ðgirlfriend,€Joanne€Fisher,€testified€that€Thomas€Gribble€had€given€her€the€$500€the€Defendant€hadÐ ô$D # Ðoriginally€given€him€to€drop„off€at€the€probation€office.€€€She€further€stated€that€she€had€attemptedÐ à%0!$ Ðto€give€the€delinquent€payments€to€Crawford,€but€he€had€rejected€the€payments.€€Ð Ì&"% ÐÌà  àThe€trial€court€upon€hearing€this€testimony€granted€the€petition€to€revoke€and€ordered€thatÐ ¤(ô#' Ðthe€Defendant€serve€his€original€eight„year€sentence.€€From€that€decision,€the€Defendant€now€appeals.Ð )à$( Ðà@ìì*ìàˆÌò òÓ  ÓANALYSISó óÐ h+¸&* ÐÓ ÓÌà  àThe€Defendant€contends€that€the€trial€court€erred€when€it€revoked€his€probation€and€orderedÐ œì Ðhim€to€serve€his€sentence€in€the€Tennessee€Department€of€Correction.€€We€disagree.Ð ˆØ ÐÌà  àInitially,€we€note€that€Defendant€has€failed€to€cite€any€authority€in€support€of€his€argument.òòóó€Ð `° ÐThe€failure€to€adequately€brief€issues€raised€in€the€appellate€court€will€result€in€a€waiver.€€Tenn.€Ct.Ð L œ ÐCrim.€App.€R.€10.€€The€same€result€occurs€when€no€legal€authority€is€cited€in€support€of€the€argumentÐ 8 ˆ Ðadvanced.€€Tenn.€R.€App.€P.€27(a);€Tenn.€Ct.€Crim.€App.€R.€10(b).€€Thus,€this€issue€has€been€waived.€Ð $ t ÐÌà  àNotwithstanding€waiver,€the€Defendant€is€not€entitled€to€relief€on€the€merits.€€A€trial€courtÐ ü L  Ðmay€revoke€probation€and€reinstate€the€original€sentence€on€finding€by€a€preponderance€of€theÐ è 8  Ðevidence€that€a€defendant€has€violated€a€condition€of€probation,€and€this€Court€reviews€suchÐ Ô$  Ðrevocation€under€an€abuse€of€discretion€standard,€an€abuse€evinced€only€by€a€record€devoid€ofÐ À  Ðsubstantial€evidence€that€a€violation€has€occurred.€€òòSeeóó€Tenn.Code€Ann.€ðð€40-35-311(d);€€òòState€v.Ð ¬ü  ÐHarkinsóó,€811€S.W.2d€79,€82€(Tenn.€1991);€òòState€v.€Gregoryóó,€946€S.W.2d€829,€832€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.Ð ˜è  Ð1997).Ð „Ô  ÐÌà  àThe€Defendant€argues€that€his€probation€could€not€be€revoked,€when€there€was€no€originalÐ \¬ Ðorder€of€probation.€€Here,€the€Defendant€signed€a€Certificate€of€Probation,€issued€by€the€TennesseeÐ H˜ ÐDepartment€of€Correction,€which€included€the€following:Ð 4„ Ðà  àÌà0  à7.€I€will€allow€my€Probation€Officer€to€visit€my€home,€employment€site,€or€elsewhere,€andÐ  \ Ðwill€carry€out€all€instructions€he/she€gives,€and€report€to€my€Probation€Officer€as€givenÐ øH Ðinstruction€to€report.€€Ðä4(#(# ÐÌà  àThe€Defendant€signed€the€Certificate€of€Probation,€acknowledging€that€he€understood€theÐ ¼  Ðterms€of€his€release€and€agreed€to€comply€with€the€conditions€of€probation.€€The€Certificate€ofÐ ¨ø ÐProbation€signed€by€the€Defendant€was€not€ambiguous€and€clearly€set€forth€the€terms€of€hisÐ ”ä Ðprobation,€which€the€Defendant€violated.€€Furthermore,€the€Defendant€does€not€dispute€the€terms€ofÐ €Ð Ðhis€probation,€as€defined€in€the€Certificate€of€Probation.€€Thus,€we€find€no€abuse€of€discretion€in€theÐ l¼ Ðtrial€courtððs€reliance€upon€this€Certificate€of€Probation€to€revoke€the€Defendantððs€probation.Ð X ¨ ÐÌà  àNext,€the€Defendant€claims€that€the€trial€court€abused€its€discretion€in€revoking€his€probationÐ 0"€  Ðbased€upon€his€failure€to€pay€$2,000€to€the€drug€funds€of€Warren€County€and€the€City€ofÐ #l! ÐMcMinnville.€€We€find€that€the€failure€to€make€drug€fund€payments€may€constitute€a€violation€of€theÐ $X" Ðterms€of€probation€if€the€trial€court€determines€that€nonpayment€results€from€willful€refusal€to€payÐ ô$D # Ðor€failure€to€make€sufficient€bona€fide€efforts€to€pay.€òòSeeóó€òòState€v.€Dyeóó,€715€S.W.2d€36,€40€(Tenn.Ð à%0!$ Ð1986);€òòState€v.€Masseyóó,€929€S.W.2d€399,€402€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.€1996).€€However,€nonpayment€asÐ Ì&"% Ða€consequence€of€a€legitimate€inability€to€pay€may€not€constitute€the€sole€basis€for€revocation€andÐ ¸'#& Ðsubsequent€imprisonment.€€òòSeeóó€òòMasseyóó,€929€S.W.2d€at€402.€Ð ¤(ô#' ÐÌà  àAlthough€the€record€is€devoid€of€an€original€order€of€probation,€specifying€the€terms€ofÐ |*Ì%) ÐDefendantððs€probation,€we€find€the€transcript€of€the€revocation€hearing€sufficiently€established€theÐ h+¸&* Ðoriginal€terms€of€the€Defendantððs€probation.€€At€the€hearing,€the€trial€court€rejected€the€DefendantððsÐ ° Ðstated€reasons€for€his€failure€to€make€the€monthly€payments€of€$135.€€The€trial€court€find€that€theÐ œì ÐDefendant€had€not€made€sufficient€efforts€to€make€these€payments.€€€Thus,€we€conclude€that€thereÐ ˆØ Ðwas€substantial€evidence€to€show€that€the€defendant€violated€his€probation;€therefore,€the€trial€judgeÐ tÄ Ðdid€not€abuse€his€discretion€in€revoking€probation.Ð `° ÐÌà  àIn€his€final€issue,€the€Defendant€asserts€that€the€trial€court€erred€in€not€granting€him€aÐ 8 ˆ Ðcontinuance,€in€order€to€insure€the€presence€of€a€material€witness.€€The€Defendant€claimed€thatÐ $ t ÐThomas€Gribble€could€testify€regarding€the€money€the€Defendant€had€given€him€to€makeÐ  ` ÐDefendantððs€drug€fund€payments.€€The€continuance€was€not€granted.€€However,€the€decision€to€grantÐ ü L  Ðor€deny€a€motion€for€a€continuance€rests€within€the€sound€discretion€of€the€trial€judge€and€will€notÐ è 8  Ðbe€disturbed€on€appeal€unless€there€has€been€ð ða€clear€showing€of€abuse€of€that€discretion.ðð€€òòState€v.Ð Ô$  ÐButleróó,€795€S.W.2d€680,€684€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.€1990).€€òòóóIn€this€instance€we€find€no€abuse€ofÐ À  Ðdiscretion€by€the€trial€judge.€€€Ð ¬ü  ÐÌà  àFinally,€we€note€that€the€judgment€for€case€#F„7245€contains€a€clerical€error,€in€that€itÐ „Ô  Ðincorrectly€describes€the€Defendantððs€conviction€in€Count€I.€€The€judgment€states€that€the€DefendantÐ pÀ Ðwas€convicted€of€ð ðpossession€of€a€schedule€II€controlled€substance,€to€wit:€cocaine€in€excess€of€0.5Ð \¬ Ðgrams.ðð€€Moreover,€the€judgment€also€shows€that€the€Defendant€was€convicted€of€a€Class€B€felonyÐ H˜ Ðunder€Count€I,€pursuant€to€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€39„17„417.€€€€However,€Defendantððs€guilty€plea€showsÐ 4„ Ðthat€he€pled€guilty€to€ð ðpossession€of€a€schedule€II€controlled€substance,€to€wit:€cocaine€in€excess€ofÐ  p Ð0.5€grams€òòwith€intent€to€sell€or€deliveróó.ðð€€Therefore,€the€language€in€the€judgment€appears€to€suggestÐ  \ Ðthat€the€Defendant€was€convicted€of€simple€possession,€which€is€a€Class€A€misdemeanor€under€Tenn.Ð øH ÐCode€Ann.€ðð€39„17„418(c).€€We,€therefore,€remand€for€the€trial€court€to€file€an€amended€judgmentÐ ä4 Ðto€indicate€that€the€Defendant€pled€guilty€of€ð ðpossession€of€a€schedule€II€controlled€substance,€to€wit:Ð Ð  Ðcocaine€in€excess€of€0.5€grams€òòwith€intent€to€sell€or€deliveróó,ðð€as€defined€in€ðð39„17„417(c)(1).€€òòSeeóóÐ ¼  ÐTenn.€R.€Crim.€P.€36€(ð ðClerical€mistakes€in€judgments,€orders,€or€other€parts€of€the€record€and€errorsÐ ¨ø Ðin€the€record€arising€from€oversight€or€omission€may€be€corrected€by€the€court€at€any€time€and€afterÐ ”ä Ðsuch€notice,€if€any,€as€the€court€orders.ðð).€Ð €Ð ÐÌò òÓ  ÓCONCLUSIONó óÐ X ¨ ÐÓÇ;ÓÌà  àFor€the€foregoing€reasons,€we€affirm€the€trial€courtððs€order€revoking€probation€and€reinstatingÐ 0"€  Ðthe€Defendantððs€original€sentence.€€We€also€remand€to€the€trial€court€for€entry€of€an€amendedÐ #l! Ðjudgment€correcting€a€clerical€error.Ð $X" ÐÌà  àà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  à___________________________________€Ð à%0!$ Ðà  àà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  àTHOMAS€T.€WOODALL,€JUDGEÐ Ì&"% ÐÔ#†XúXX Xú-#Ô