WPC 2 83ŨAtTeA]2$G?VeɋCFܭM YwB:8+uRN {,*vR9ꃫ)LM?ʝ;O3N_lϮUk،u]ɺZ }&.e`YZޡNfEō-_3_!縷M7;pRO|[6 O4ڙC%d-AՉ4N u}{XIָl3G" CAopfzq؂h0y2[לd#9tkegm=  $yM՗hC&^k6E79~BUq4zG +kMPW[5S1ʑ1ArtaC>z*E|!E>зFV}&X5Ja September6,1996. *   ThedefendantwasthenindictedbytheMontgomeryCountyGrandJuryonOctober7,1996,  onachargeofaggravatedburglary.OnMay29,1997,thedefendantpledguiltytotheaggravated  burglarycharge,wassentencedtotwo(2)yearscommunitycorrectionsforviolationofprobation  onthepriordrugconvictions,andwassentencedtofive(5)yearscommunitycorrectionsforthe v aggravatedburglaryconviction,consecutivetooneanother,foraneffectivesevenyearsin b communitycorrections.Thedefendantalsosignedabehavior# XXUy#XUyX Ԁcontract,whichsetoutthetermsand N conditionsofhiscommunitycorrections. :   OnFebruary17,2000,anaffidavitofviolationofacourtorderedsentenceandawarrantwas !b  issuedagainstthedefendant,charginghimwithviolatinghiscommunitycorrectionssentence.A !N! communitycorrectionsviolationhearingwasheldonApril27,2000.Atthehearing,thedefendant's ":" communitycorrectionscasemanagertestifiedthatalthoughthedefendantperformedwellinthefirst #&# twelvemonthsofhiscorrectionsprogram,fromJanuaryof1999untilhereceiveda_DUI_ԀinJanuary $ $ of2000,herepeatedlyviolatedhiscommunitycorrectionssentence.Thedefendantalsotestifiedat % % thehearingandadmittedthatheviolatedthetermsofhissentence. &!& ̀  Thetrialcourtfoundthatthedefendantviolatedthetermsofhiscommunitycorrections r(#( sentenceby: ^)$)  X X$,XX$(1)0 4 Failingtoreportasdirected;J*%*4 4  (2)0 4 Failingtoremainintoxicantfree;6+&+4 4  (3)0 4 Failingtoreportanarrestfor_DUI_;",r',4 4  (4)0 4 Failingtoabidebytheproposedcurfew;#-^(-4 4  #_(5)0 4 Failingtopaycourtcostsandfees;4 4  (6)0 4 Failingtoperformpublicservicework;and4 4  (7)0 4 Failingtomakeprogressinhisgroupcounseling.4 4   X X XUponfindingthedefendantinviolationofhiscommunitycorrectionssentence,thetrialcourt ` orderedthedefendanttoservetheremainderofhisoriginalsentenceinconfinement. L   8  Acommunitycorrectionsrevocationisreviewedunderanabuseofdiscretionstandard.State $ t v.Harkins,811S.W.2d79,82(Tenn.1991).Ifatrialcourtfinds,byapreponderanceofthe  ` evidence,thatthedefendantviolatedthetermsofhiscommunitycorrectionssentence,itmayrevoke  L  thedefendant'ssentence.Tenn.CodeAnn.4035311(b)(e).Thisdecisionbythetrialcourtwill  8  notbereversedifsubstantialevidencesupportsthetrialcourt'sfinding.Harkins,811S.W.2dat82. $     Onappeal,thedefendantcontendsthatalthoughheadmittedlyviolatedseveraltermsofhis   communitycorrectionssentence,thetrialcourtshouldhavesentencedhimtoanothersentencing   alternativeandnotincarceration.However,atrialcourtisnotrequiredtoreconsidertheprinciples   ofsentencingafterfindingthatadefendantviolatedthetermsofacommunitycorrectionssentence. p See,e.g.,Statev.McLemore,No.03C019709CC00406,1998WL422339(Tenn.Crim.App., \ filedJuly28,1998,atKnoxville).Wefindnomeritinthedefendant'scontentionandholdthatthe H recordclearlysupportsthetrialcourt'sactions. 4   p Accordingly,thejudgmentofthetrialcourtisaffirmedinaccordancewithTennesseeCourt  \ ofCriminalProcedureRule20.Itappearingthatthedefendantisindigent,costswillbepaidbythe H StateofTennessee. 4          4  4  `       <  h       0  ___________________________________(#(#  4  `       <  h         JOHNEVERETTWILLIAMS,JUDGE l  X   D!  0"   #l!  4  `       <  h         ___________________________________ $X"  4  `       <  h         GARYR.WADE,PRESIDINGJUDGE $D #  %0!$  &"%  '#&  (#'  )$(  4  `       <  h         ___________________________________ |*%)  4  `       <  h         JOSEPHM.TIPTON,JUDGE