ÿWPCý r^Œ2ùãòQqÆ&r¼Y¨Ô·Œæ…5îhÖóñ’@³R}Ũ³œû7k_†áâ³2ü4ÂÉ—ŸóR/¹‡í•Ç¥„þü¾•”3¾Û%ÛÅS—u ã!JENUoÆ‚™«`v:oý±,›°Ò23©–õm`ôò-٦њòéœ qɈž¦ñý Â=ù'°þÝpßCà_Þ;8£ .×·|U—:±Zª{Züµ¢P¶¼Í ]´ÿvqij8í1ˆ€,y²ŸIŒ;„å Ì þUb=¶1`|ñ¿èÕ4‘iѸH*•‚†Ó\! Ú¬Å#¼}§7ŒÜØù³ª8pS˜â¨£©r„ä]ë:TÐŽÉ!>a[úK…Oh, Â@$÷•„•vçH“%¥ s4E¹ˆ2æäôf.é‹u½†=”5cP*fnïVÙIäù|Õ0„9A Ÿýì.Âñðk@”aE”clI_¬·Vßwž Ø:)¥63’C ]óƃ˜)ýÝ´*$§ÑÉM¦zpYø®SÏá»L[d‹§©¹S¯Âu‡$¹äñÁÖˆÓEÿXÅ]«¨((öù;þWZAùÄ™ƒl\V™)dRB‚rˆ#èÛïbU"N\ %ª 0ˆ°^ 8wD4H\ zkÒå· m¹ #ÁÐ 0D‘ ÆÕ Æ› Æa Æ'UNíN;l=?©Eèêêêêêêêêêêêêêêêêêêêêêêêbòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòò 0ëúúúú Båå 0¤ D3¦ D-Ù 0K ASQƤ 0¤j 0D A«R(ÈhH  Z6Times New Roman Regular»(`£ª$¡¡Ñ€.ÑÑ8€½­»»d»»d8ÑÑ ý ÑÓ  ÓÐm1+â Yo†)¨ù¦‚¤3|x ˜C:\PROGRA~1\COREL\WORDPE~1\TEMPLATE\CUSTOM~1\REVISE~1.WPTC:\Program Files\Corel\WordPerfect Office 2000\Template\Custom WP Templates\revised standard opinion.wptÿU‹ÿÀÀÀ˜HP LaserJet 4050 Series PCL 6ÈÈÈÈÈÈÈÈ0(#Ã$òòÚ  Ú0Ú  ÚóóLevel 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5‚Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5„Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5…Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5(ÖÃ9 Z‹6Times New Roman Regular bÝ ƒR º$ÝÓ  Óà  àòòÚ  Ú1Ú  ÚóóÔ€ôtò»»ÔÝ  ÝÔ_ÔIn€view€of€our€holding,€we€find€it€unnecessary€to€address€the€merits€of€the€Appellantððs€claim€that€hisÐ ° Ðð ðuncounseledðð€statement€was€not€voluntary.€€We€note,€however,€that€the€Fifth€Amendment€neither€prohibits€a€volunteeredÐ tÄ Ðð ðuncounseledðð€statement€to€the€police€nor€a€statement€volunteered€after€counsel€is€waived.€€Moreover,€the€voluntarinessÐ 8ˆ Ðof€a€juvenileððs€waiver€of€his€Fifth€Amendment€rights€is€determined€under€a€totality„of„the„circumstances€test€and€theÐ üL Ðvoluntariness€of€such€statement€is€not€necessarily€dependent€upon€the€presence€of€a€parent€or€guardian.€€òòState€v.€Callahanóó,Ð À  Ð979€S.W.2d€577€(Tenn.€1998). 5Ý ƒR º$ÝÓ  Óà  àòòÚ  Ú2Ú  ÚóóÔ€ôtò»»ÔÝ  ÝÔ_ÔWe€acknowledge€that€a€direct€appeal€of€a€guilty€plea€is€available€when€challenged€upon€jurisdictional€groundsÐ ° Ðor€when€the€voluntariness€of€the€plea€is€in€question. - ù-(|G2 º$¤¤Ý ƒ£ª!ÝÑ€.ÑÑ8€&¬»»dd8ÑÑ ý ÑÓ  ÓÝ  Ýà  àòòÚ  Ú0Ú  ÚóóÔ€ôtò»»Ô d(|3m$££Ý ƒ£ª!ÝÑ€.ÑÑ8€&¬»»dd8ÑÑ ý ÑÓ  ÓÝ  ÝVVVV'ÿÿdxd)!ÈÈÈÈdxdx( ±þ$’’ò òFigure€Ú  Ú1Ú  Úó ó^_X`YEþÿ<<CÿÿƒLevel 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5(|3m$¢¢Ý ƒ£ª!ÝÑ€.ÑÑ8€&¬»»dd8ÑÑ ý ÑÓ  ÓÝ  Ý($$””ò òÚ  Ú1Ú  Úó óX[Z&OLE 2.0 Box <=8ÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿCÿÿ HKKKKÝ ƒ£ª!ÝÑ€.ÑÑ8€&¬»»ddÈ8ÑÑ ý ÑÓ  ÓÝ  ÝÔ_ÔÑ  ÑÑ  ÑÔ€¼&¬»»»ÔÑ8€yàXXdì»»d8Ñà@ttìàÔ‡î;&¬ÔIN€THE€COURT€OF€CRIMINAL€APPEALS€OF€TENNESSEEˆÐ ° Ðà@õõ%ìàAT€JACKSONÔ#†¼&¬»îî; #ԈРÖ& ÐÓ  Óà @ àà @` àAugust€7,€2001€SessionÐ üL ÐÔ‡XyàX»¼&¬ÔÌò òÔ#†¼&¬»XXyà#ÔQUINCY€BLEDSOEòòóó€v.€STATE€OF€TENNESSEEòòóóÔ‡XyàX»¼&¬Ôó óÐ úJ ÐÌà@@½½ìàò òDirect€Appeal€from€the€Circuit€Court€for€Fayette€CountyÐ ú J Ðà@@øøìàNo.€4480€€€€€€Jon€Kerry€Blackwood,€JudgeÐ æ 6 ÐÌÌà@@ìì*ìàßA€V) °°` d€÷E<©` AßÐ ªú  ÐÌà@@TTìàNo.€W2000„02701„CCA„R3„PC€„€Filed€September€14,€Ô_Ô2001Ô_ÔÐ ¥õ  ÐÌßA€V) °°` dE<|` AßÐ }Í  Ðó óÌÓ  ÓThe€Appellant,€Quincy€Bledsoe,€appeals€from€the€dismissal€of€his€petition€for€post„conviction€reliefÐ xÈ  Ðby€the€Fayette€County€Circuit€Court.€€In€1997,€Bledsoe€pled€guilty€to€aggravated€kidnapping€andÐ d´ Ðattempted€felony€escape€and€received€an€effective€nine„year€Department€of€Correction€sentence€asÐ P  Ða€violent€offender.€€On€appeal,€Bledsoe€seeks€to€set€aside€his€convictions€upon€grounds€that€his€pleasÐ <Œ Ðwere€ð ðbased€upon€an€uncounseled€statement€that€was€not€knowingly€and€voluntarily€given.ðð€€FindingÐ (x Ðthis€issue€without€merit,€the€judgment€of€the€post„conviction€court€is€affirmed.Ô#†¼&¬»XXyàˆ#ÔÔ‡XyàX»¼&¬ÔÐ d ÐÓ±ÓÌò òTenn.€R.€App.€P.€3;€Judgment€of€the€Circuit€Court€is€Affirmed.ó óÐ ì< ÐÌòòÓ  ÓÔ#†¼&¬»àXyà‰#ÔÔ‡XyàX.¼&¬ÔDavid€G.€Hayes,€J.óó,€delivered€the€opinion€of€the€court,€in€which€òòJoe€G.€Rileyóó€and€òòAlan€E.€Glennóó,Ð Ä ÐJJ.,€joined.Ð ° ÐÌAlan€B.€Chambers,€Memphis,€Tennessee,€for€the€Appellant,€Quincy€Bledsoe.Ð ˆØ ÐÌPaul€G.€Summers,€Attorney€General€and€Reporter;€Michael€Moore,€Solicitor€General;€John€H.Ð `° ÐBledsoe,€Assistant€Attorney€General;€Elizabeth€T.€Rice,€District€Attorney€General;€and€ColinÐ L œ ÐCampbell,€Assistant€District€Attorney€General,€for€the€Appellee,€State€of€Tennessee.Ð 8!ˆ  ÐÔ#†¼&¬»XXyàZ#ÔÔ‡XyàX»¼&¬ÔÌÓ+ÓÌà@@OO&ìàò òOPINIONó óÔ#†¼&¬»XXyàè #ÔÔ‡XyàX»¼&¬ÔÐ ü#L# ÐÌòòóóÔ#†¼&¬»XXyà[ #ÔÓ  ÓÔ€XyàX»¼&¬Ôò òà@!ìàFactual€Backgroundó óˆÐ Ô%$!% ÐÌà  àOn€March€21,€1997,€the€Appellant,€age€sixteen,€was€an€inmate€at€the€Wilder€YouthÐ ¬'ü"' ÐDevelopment€Center€in€Fayette€County.€€On€this€date,€the€Appellant€and€two€co„defendants€ð ðwereÐ ˜(è#( Ðin€an€exercise€yard€with€other€inmates€[when]€a€security€guard€was€assaulted,€handcuffed,€andÐ „)Ô$) Ðimprisoned€in€a€small€room€while€the€[Appellant€and€his€co„defendants]€endeavored€to€escape.ððÐ p*À%* ÐÌà  àOn€the€morning€of€his€scheduled€trial,€the€Appellant€pled€guilty€under€the€terms€of€aÐ H,˜', Ðnegotiated€plea€agreement€to€one€count€of€aggravated€kidnapping€of€the€security€guard€with€theÐ 4-„(-ý Ðintent€to€interfere€with€performance€of€her€governmental€function,€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€39„13„Ð ° Ð304(a)(2),€and€to€one€count€of€attempted€felony€escape,€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€39„16„605.€€TheÐ œì Ðremaining€charges€were€dismissed.Ð ˆØ ÐÌà  àOn€November€29,€1999,€the€Appellant€timely€filed€a€petition€for€post„conviction€relief€uponÐ `° Ðseveral€grounds,€including€a€challenge€to€the€validity€of€an€incriminating€statement€which€heÐ L œ Ðprovided€to€the€Tennessee€Bureau€of€Investigation.€€Specifically,€he€asserted€that€he€was€deprivedÐ 8 ˆ Ðof€his€right€to€remain€silent€and€ð ðwas€deprived€of€his€right€to€parental€advice€at€the€time€he€wasÐ $ t Ðinterrogated.ðð€€As€such,€he€avers€that€his€statement€to€the€TBI€was€the€product€of€coercion€and€theÐ  ` Ðð ðsubsequent€proceedings€were€poisoned€by€the€nature€of€the€statement.ðð€€The€Appellantððs€grandfatherÐ ü L  Ðtestified€at€the€post„conviction€hearing€that€he€was€denied€permission€to€see€his€grandson,€and,€if€heÐ è 8  Ðcould€have€spoken€with€him,€he€would€have€ð ðtold€him€to€remain€silent€until€he€could€talk€to€aÐ Ô$  Ðlawyer.ðð€€With€regard€to€the€challenged€statement€to€the€TBI,€the€Appellant€acknowledged€that€heÐ À  Ðwas€provided€òòMirandaóó€rights€and€that€he€signed€a€written€form€waiving€those€rights.€€Additionally,Ð ¬ü  Ðthe€Appellant€acknowledged€that€he€signed€the€four„page€statement€which€he€provided€to€the€TBI.€Ð ˜è  ÐAt€the€hearing,€the€Appellant€also€admitted€that€the€contents€of€his€statement€were€correct.€Ð „Ô  ÐAppellantððs€counsel€at€trial€testified€that€he€specifically€discussed€with€the€Appellant€theÐ pÀ Ðcircumstances€under€which€the€statement€was€obtained€and€saw€no€grounds€to€support€itsÐ \¬ Ðsuppression.€€Counsel€also€related€that€the€Appellant€never€disputed€the€truthfulness€of€his€statementÐ H˜ Ðand€that€it€was€counselððs€ð ðunderstanding€[the€Appellant]€gave€the€statement€because€he€wanted€toÐ 4„ Ðcooperate.ðð€€At€the€conclusion€of€the€hearing,€the€post„conviction€court€found€the€AppellantððsÐ  p Ðstatement€voluntary€and€dismissed€the€petition.Ð  \ ÐÌà@òò&ìàò òANALYSISó óˆÐ ä4 ÐÔ‡XyàXXXyàÔÌà  àIn€order€to€succeed€on€a€post„conviction€claim,€the€Appellant€bears€the€burden€of€showingÐ ¼  Ðby€clear€and€convincing€evidence€the€allegations€set€forth€in€his€petition.€€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€40„30„Ð ¨ø Ð210(f)€(1997).€€When€this€court€undertakes€review€of€a€lower€courtððs€decision€on€a€petition€for€post„Ð ”ä Ðconviction€relief,€the€lower€courtððs€findings€of€fact€are€given€the€weight€of€a€jury€verdict€and€areÐ €Ð Ðconclusive€on€appeal€absent€a€finding€that€the€evidence€preponderated€against€the€judgment.€€òòBlackÐ l¼ Ðv.€Stateóó,€794€S.W.2d€752,€755€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.€1990).€€This€court€may€not€reweigh€or€re„evaluateÐ X ¨ Ðthe€evidence€or€substitute€its€inferences€for€those€drawn€by€the€post„conviction€court.€€òòIdòò.óóóó€€Further,Ð D!” Ðquestions€concerning€the€credibility€of€witnesses€and€the€weight€to€be€given€their€testimony€are€forÐ 0"€  Ðresolution€by€the€post„conviction€court.€€òòId.óó€€Ô#†XyàXXXyàl#ÔÔ‡XyàXXXyàÔOn€appeal,€the€Appellant€raises€one€issue€for€our€review:Ð #l! Ðð ðwhether€post„conviction€relief€should€have€been€granted€because€appellantððs€guilty€plea€was€basedÐ $X" Ðupon€an€uncounseled€statement€that€was€not€knowingly€and€voluntarily€given.ðð€Ô#†XyàXXXyàÇ#ÔWe€find€theÐ ô$D # ÐAppellantððs€argument€flawed.׃×Ý ƒ #ÃÝòòÚ  Ú1Ú  ÚóóÝ  Ý×  ×€First,€it€is€important€to€note€that€the€issue€presented€by€the€AppellantÐ à%0!$ Ðdoes€not€address€the€voluntariness€of€the€guilty€plea€but,€rather,€the€voluntariness€of€a€statementÐ ° Ðobtained€during€the€investigation€of€the€case.€€Even€if€the€Appellantððs€statement€was€involuntary,€thisÐ œì Ðwould€not€void€his€convictions€as€the€ð ðerror€complained€of€[was]€waived€as€a€matter€of€law€by€theÐ ˆØ Ðplea€of€guilty.ðð€€òòSeeóó€Tenn.€R.€Crim.€P.€37(b)(2)(iii).€€Although€a€€guilty€plea€with€an€agreed€sentence,Ð tÄ Ðas€in€this€case,€may€not€generally€be€directly€appealed,€it€is€subject€to€collateral€attack€within€theÐ `° Ðpost„conviction€context€if€the€guilty€plea€itself€resulted€from€the€infringement€of€a€constitutionalÐ L œ Ðright.€€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€40„30€„203.׃×Ý ƒ #ÃÝòòÚ  Ú2Ú  ÚóóÝ  Ý×  ×€€Ô‡XyàXXXyàÔThe€established€test€for€determining€the€validity€of€the€guiltyÐ 8 ˆ Ðplea€is,€ð ðwhether€the€plea€represents€a€voluntary€and€intelligent€choice€among€the€alternative€coursesÐ $ t Ðof€action€open€to€the€defendant.ðð€€òòHill€v.€Lockhartóó,€474€U.S.€52,€56,€106€S.€Ct.€366,€369€(citing€òòNorthÐ  ` ÐCarolina€v.€Alfordóó,€400€U.S.€25,€31,€91€S.€Ct.€160,€164€(1970)).€€In€order€for€a€plea€to€be€deemedÐ ü L  Ðknowingly€and€voluntarily€entered,€an€accused€must€be€informed€of€the€rights€and€circumstancesÐ è 8  Ðinvolved€and€nevertheless€choose€to€waive€or€relinquish€those.€€òòState€v.€Mackeyóó,€553€S.W.2d€337,Ð Ô$  Ð340€(Tenn.€1977).€€In€this€case,€the€Appellantððs€argument€focuses€almost€entirely€upon€theÐ À  ÐAppellantððs€alleged€involuntary€confession€with€a€minimal,€at€best,€argument€as€to€its€causal€effectÐ ¬ü  Ðupon€the€voluntariness€of€his€guilty€pleas.€€Nonetheless,€we€proceed€to€review€the€voluntariness€ofÐ ˜è  Ðhis€pleas.€€Ð „Ô  ÐÌà@66"ìàò òA.€€Res€Judicataó óÔ#†XyàXXXyà{"#ԈР\¬ Ðà  àInitially,€we€note€that€this€appeal€represents€the€Appellantððs€second€appeal€to€this€court.€€OnÐ H˜ ÐNovember€13,€1997,€one€day€following€the€Appellantððs€plea€of€guilty,€the€Appellant€moved€toÐ 4„ Ðwithdraw€his€guilty€plea.€€Within€this€context,€€the€Appellant€challenged€the€voluntariness€of€hisÐ  p Ðguilty€plea€upon€the€factual€grounds€that€his€trial€counsel€failed€to€advise€him€of€the€possibility€ofÐ  \ Ðconvictions€at€trial€of€lesser„included€offenses.€€A€hearing€was€held€in€the€trial€court€at€which€timeÐ øH Ðthe€Appellantððs€motion€to€withdraw€his€guilty€pleas€was€denied.€€The€trial€courtððs€findings€are€notedÐ ä4 Ðas€follows:Ð Ð  ÐÔ‡XyàXXXyàÔÌà0  à[p]rior€to€the€acceptance€of€the€plea,€the€defendant€was€thoroughly€questioned€regarding€theÐ ¨ø Ðvoluntariness€of€his€plea.€€At€no€time€during€the€colloquy€with€the€Court€did€the€defendantÐ ”ä Ðexpress€any€dissatisfaction€with€[his€attorney]€nor€any€hesitation€or€reluctance€to€enter€a€plea.Ð €Ð Ð.€.€.The€court€finds€that€the€defendantððs€plea€in€this€case€was€knowing,€voluntary,€intelligentÐ l¼ Ðand€voluntary.ÐX ¨(#(# ÐÌOn€appeal,€this€court€affirmed€the€judgment€of€the€trial€court€denying€the€Appellantððs€motion€toÐ 0"€  Ðwithdraw€his€pleas.€€A€panel€of€this€court€€found€ð ðno€basis€to€conclude€that€the€trial€judge€abused€hisÐ #l! Ðdiscretion€in€finding€that€the€appellantððs€guilty€plea€was€knowing,€intelligent,€and€voluntary,€and€thatÐ $X" Ðno€ððfair€and€just€reasonðð€exist[ed]€to€permit€the€pleaððs€withdrawal.ðð€€òòState€v.€Bledsoeóó,€No.€02C01„Ð ô$D # Ð9712„CC„00491€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.€at€Jackson,€Jan.€26,€1999),€òòperm.€to€appeal€deniedóó,€(Tenn.€JulyÐ à%0!$ Ð6,€1999).€Ð Ì&"% ÐÔ#†XyàXXXyàH*#ÔÌà  àThe€Appellant€again€challenges€the€voluntariness€of€his€guilty€plea€but,€on€this€occasion,€Ð œì Ðupon€€differing€factual€grounds,€arguing€that€his€ð ðuncounseledðð€statement€to€the€police€was€coercedÐ ˆØ Ðand€his€subsequent€guilty€pleas€ð ðwere€poisoned€by€the€nature€of€the€statement.ððÐ tÄ ÐÌÔ‡XyàXXXyàÔà  àTenn.€Code€Ann.€ðððð€40„30„204(e),€„206(f),€(g),€(h)€(1997),€are€statutory€modifications€of€theÐ L œ Ðcommon€law€principles€of€òòres€judicataóó.€€òòóóSection€204(e)€in€pertinent€part,€states,€òòð ðóó[t]he€petitioner€Ð 8 ˆ Ðshall€include€allegations€of€fact€supporting€each€claim€for€relief€set€forth€in€the€petition€andÐ $ t Ðallegations€of€fact€explaining€why€each€ground€for€relief€was€not€previously€presented€in€any€earlier€Ð  ` Ðproceeding.€.€.€.òò€óóTenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€40„30„204(e)Ô#†XyàXXXyà“0#ÔÔ‡XyàXXXyàÔ€(1997).òò€€óóSections€206(f),€(g),€(h),€in€pertinent€part,Ð ü L  Ðstate,€Ð è 8  Ðà  àÌà0  à(f)[u]pon€receipt€of€a€petition€in€proper€form,€or€upon€receipt€of€an€amended€petition,€theÐ À  Ðcourt€shall€examine€the€allegations€of€fact€in€the€petition.€€If€the€facts€alleged,€taken€as€true,Ð ¬ü  Ðfail€to€show€that€the€petitioner€is€entitled€to€relief€or€fail€to€show€that€the€claims€for€reliefÐ ˜è  Ðhave€not€been€waived€or€previously€determined,€the€petition€shall€be€dismissed.€.€.€.Ð„Ô (#(# Ðà0  à(g)[a]€ground€for€relief€is€waived€if€the€petitioner€personally€or€through€an€attorney€failed€toÐ pÀ Ðpresent€it€for€determination€in€any€proceeding€before€a€court€of€competent€jurisdiction€inÐ \¬ Ðwhich€the€ground€could€have€been€presented,€unless:€(1)€[t]he€claim€for€relief€is€based€uponÐ H˜ Ða€constitutional€right€not€recognized€as€existing€at€the€time€of€trial€if€either€the€federal€or€stateÐ 4„ Ðconstitution€requires€retroactive€application€of€that€right;€or€(2)€[t]he€failure€to€present€theÐ  p Ðground€was€a€result€of€state€action€in€violation€of€the€federal€or€state€constitution.€€òòÐ \(#(# Ðà0  àóó(h)[a]€ground€for€relief€is€previously€determined€if€a€court€of€competent€jurisdiction€has€ruledÐ øH Ðon€the€merits€after€a€full€and€fair€hearing.€€A€full€and€fair€hearing€has€occurred€where€theÐ ä4 Ðpetitioner€is€afforded€the€opportunity€to€call€witnesses€and€otherwise€present€evidence,Ð Ð  Ðregardless€of€whether€the€petitioner€actually€introduced€any€evidence.òò€€óóTenn.€Code€Ann.€ððÐ ¼  Ð40„30„206(f),€(g),€(h)€(1997).Ô#†XyàXXXyà3#ÔÔ‡XyàXXXyàÔòòШø(#(# ÐÌRes€Judicataóó€bars€a€second€suit€between€the€same€parties€with€respect€not€only€to€all€issues€raisedÐ €Ð Ðin€the€former€suit,€but€with€respect€to€all€issues€which€could€have€been€raised.€€òòBates€v.€Stateóó,€No.Ð l¼ Ð03C01„9208„CR„00279€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.€at€Knoxville,€May€6,€1993),€òòperm.€to€app.€denied,€óó(Tenn.Ð X ¨ ÐNov.€1,€1993)€(citing€òòMassengill€v.€Scottóó,€738€S.W.2d€629€(Tenn.€1987)).€€Collateral€estoppel€barsÐ D!” Ða€second€suit€between€the€same€parties€on€different€theories€as€to€those€issues€determined€in€theÐ 0"€  Ðformer€suit.€€òòId.óó€€Together,€the€two€doctrines€bar€second€suits€between€the€same€parties€.€.€.€whichÐ #l! Ðraise€issues€which€could€have€been€raised€in€the€former€suit€.€.€.€or€issues€which€were€determined€inÐ $X" Ðthe€former€suit.€€òòIdóó;€òòsee€also€óóòòArthur€v.€Stateóó,€483€S.W.2d€95,€97€(Tenn.€1972),€òòMorgan€v.€Stateóó,€445Ð ô$D # ÐS.W.2d€477,€478€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.€1969),€òòPhillips€v.€Stateóó,€458€S.W.2d€642,€644€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.Ð à%0!$ Ð1970),€òòNelson€v.€Stateóó,€470€S.W.2d€32,€34€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.€1971).òòóó€€These€sections€incorporate€òòresÐ Ì&"% Ðjudicataóó€principles€but€remove€their€effect€in€cases€where€waiver€is€justified.€€òòSeeóó€Tenn.€Code.€Ann.Ð ¸'#& Ððð€40„30„206(g)€(1997).Ð ¤(ô#' ÐÌÔ#†XyàXXXyàk:#ÔÔ‡XyàXXXyàÔà  àWe€conclude€that€the€Appellantððs€argument€of€voluntariness€of€his€pleas€is€barred€byÐ |*Ì%) Ðprinciples€of€òòres€judicata€óóand,€therefore,€the€petition€should€be€dismissed.€€òòSee€óóTenn.€Code€Ann.€ððÐ h+¸&* Ð40„30„206(f)€(1997).€€The€Appellantððs€post„conviction€petition€raises€issues€which€could€have€beenÐ ° Ðraised€in€the€direct€appeal€of€his€motion€to€withdraw€his€guilty€plea€or€issues€which€were€determinedÐ œì Ðon€the€direct€appeal.€€Furthermore,€waiver€of€òòres€judicata€óóprinciples€is€not€applicable€to€this€case.€Ô#†XyàXXXyàu@#ÔÐ ˆØ ЀÌÌÌà@FF%ìàò òCONCLUSIONó óˆÐ 8 ˆ ÐÌà  àBased€upon€the€foregoing,€we€find€that€our€review€of€the€issue€raised€by€the€Appellant€isÐ  ` Ðbarred€by€principles€of€òòres€judicataóó.€€Accordingly,€the€judgment€of€the€post„conviction€court€isÐ ü L  Ðaffirmed.Ð è 8  ÐÌÌÌÌà  àà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  à___________________________________€Ð „Ô  Ðà  àà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  àDAVID€G.€HAYES,€JUDGE