WPC-1 UvrA8eYa'@i6;eV =\dXhD8qnʮz8efD\OATŞ0 N/w'sN*ݼh U)$UHl`z|Bx=Rriy8Yg/Y0Ctt1~r- +?mX -Pύ_]R l 4hI1`?KԗhĵYϴ1|sygB}_;/xjH4&[̸b$Ģջ(p>N9P{zFN>h|"47xne$-ryDS" :U{lyA8xU< pIPb37tWBRЛa(!XvhsO*\nj`QՂlBJ{V+MY-[(n˖Pv`c׍ $Bc-W#U N % 0: ^  w% 4) = L mN 0Ue 0 0 0 0l 0L 0) 0 0 0CE 0 0 0 0o 0= 0 0 0 0@U 0 0i 0: 0 0 0 0` 0" 00 0< 0K 0> 0vG 0` 0`! 0`}! 0`! 0`=" 08" 0" 02# 0# 0:$ 0Y% 0_h% 0 % 0j& 0;( B*) D/) D+* 0C* D/+ 0+ 06, 0, 0:. 0^<. 0<. 1e. 0N;/U6/U>/U*/b'0 1u/0 720:0000000 B1\\IB01S02\CLERKJAC,,,,0(9 Z6Times New Roman RegularX($USUS.,z;1 ~/:i+003|xU*+ (_2623  ..*G+M (_25   /%` ` hp x /23  ..  5+ ` hp x 5  *D+M (_24   ," hp x ,23  ..  5+ ` hp x 5  *A+M (_23  ` ) hp x )23  ..  5+ ` hp x 5  *>+M (_22   &hhp x &23  ..  5+ ` hp x 5  *;+M (_21   #p x #23  ..  5+ ` hp x 5  *8+M (_20  h  p x 23  ..  5+ ` hp x 5  *5+M (_19   pp x 23  ..  5+ ` hp x 5  *2+M (_18    x 23  ..  5+ ` hp x 5  * (_1723  Ԁ*GM (_16   /%` ` hp x /23  Ԁ  5+ ` hp x 5  *DM (_15   ," hp x ,23  Ԁ  5+ ` hp x 5  *AM (_14  ` ) hp x )23  Ԁ  5+ ` hp x 5  *>M (_13   &hhp x &23  Ԁ  5+ ` hp x 5  *;M (_12   #p x #23  Ԁ  5+ ` hp x 5  *8M (_11  h  p x 23  Ԁ  5+ ` hp x 5  *5M (_10   pp x 23  Ԁ  5+ ` hp x 5  (2M &_9    x 23  Ԁ  5+ ` hp x 5  ( &_823  (GM &_7   /%` ` hp x /23   5+ ` hp x 5  (DM &_6   ," hp x ,23   5+ ` hp x 5  (AM &_5  ` ) hp x )23   5+ ` hp x 5  (>M &_4   &hhp x &23   5+ ` hp x 5  (;M &_3   #p x #23   5+ ` hp x 5  (8M &_2  h  p x 23   5+ ` hp x 5  (5M &_1   pp x 23   5+ ` hp x 5  &2M $_    x 23   5+ ` hp x 5  0.Normal<:Definition T<AA:Definition L , 5+ ` hp x 5  5+ ` hp x 586Definition(''&H1      (&H2  (&H3  (&H4 XXX (&H5  (&H6  20Address8MM6Blockquote , , 5+ ` hp x 5   5+ ` hp x 5,*CITE,dl*CODEKI<6X9`(Courier NewKSJ\  `&Times New RomanS42Emphasis64Hyperlink    <:FollowedHype    4go2Keyboard KI<6X9`(Courier NewKSJ\  `&Times New RomanS <:Preformatted/%  ,Kk %#/KI<6X9`(Courier NewKSJ\  `&Times New RomanS/%  ,Kk %#/<:zBottom of 7=(X7  ?K%2A`Arial?  SJ\  `&Times New RomanS7>(X7&  d d<)1dxd'dxd<:zTop of For7@(X7  ?K%2A`Arial?  SJ\  `&Times New RomanS7>(X7<)2dxd0KS.SampleKI<6X9`(Courier NewKSJ\  `&Times New RomanS0.Strong 8dl6TypewriterKI<6X9`(Courier NewKSJ\  `&Times New RomanS42Variable: 8HTML MarkupB      2 0CommentB   35;AGMSY_11.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.(O$<6X9`(Courier New\  `&Times New Roman%2A`Arial- -3#37=CIQYag1.a.i.(1)(a)(i)1)a)Mi) 0#Xd# L  d !USUS.,  _҇XX@hhOVINTHECOURTOFCRIMINALAPPEALSOFTENNESSEE  @%ATJACKSON # #X{&X҇=#@ *XX{&AssignedonBriefsAugust3,2004 F @  STATEOFTENNESSEEv.WAYNE_BOSTIC_   f #X{&X*)#҇XX{&@  #X{&X҇#DirectAppealfromtheCircuitCourtforLauderdaleCounty  ` @  No.7429JonKerryBlackwood,Judge  J @*AV) ` dE<` A߈   @  No.W200303082CCAR3CDFiledSeptember24,_2004_Ԉ   AV) ` dE<` A      Followingajurytrial,Defendant,Wayne_Bostic_,wasconvictedofonecountofdeliveryofcocaine, }  aScheduleIIcontrolledsubstance.ThetrialcourtsentencedDefendanttofiveyearsconfinement f asaRangeI,standardoffender.Defendantdoesnotappealhissentence.Defendantdoes,however, O appealthesufficiencyoftheconvictingevidence.Followingareviewoftherecord,weaffirmthe 8 trialcourtsjudgment. !q @ Tenn.R.App.P.3AppealasofRight;JudgmentoftheCircuitCourtAffirmed  C ThomasT.Woodall,J.,deliveredtheopinionofthecourt,inwhichGaryR.Wade,_P.J._,and  NormaMcGeeOgle,J.,joined.  CliffordK._McGown_,Jr.,_Waverly_,Tennessee,(onappeal)andGaryF._Antrican_,DistrictPublic  Defender;andJulieK.Pillow,AssistantDistrictPublicDefender,(attrial)fortheappellant,Wayne j _Bostic_. S PaulG.Summers,AttorneyGeneralandReporter;HelenaWaltonYarbrough,AssistantAttorney % u General;ElizabethT.Rice,DistrictAttorneyGeneral;andTraceyAnneBrewer,AssistantDistrict !^  AttorneyGeneral,fortheappellee,theStateofTennessee. !G! @55' OPINION ##   OnJanuary9,2003,DonaldWallace,anundercoveragentwiththeLauderdaleCounty % % SheriffsDepartment,wasequippedwithanaudio/videotransmitter.HethendrovetoAirportStreet &!& inHalls,Tennessee,toattempttopurchasedrugs.OfficerWallacesaidthatayoungmanfirst o'"' approachedhimandaskedOfficerWallaceifhewantedtobuysomecrackcocaine.WhenOfficer X(#( Wallacesaidthathedid,theyoungmandirectedOfficerWallacetoasecondindividualwhotold A)$) himtopullovertothecurb.Athirdindividualwasstandingintheyardofahouseacrossthestreet. **z%* ThisindividualcrossedthestreetandhandedOfficerWallacesomecrackcocaineinexchangefor +c&+ fiftydollars.Attrial,OfficerWallaceidentifiedDefendantasthemanwhohandedhimthecocaine. +L', OfficerWallacesaidthathedidnotidentifytheothertwoindividuals. ,5(-  -). OV O8{&XXdd8L O    OfficerWallacedrovearoundthecornerwhereOfficerJohnThompsonwaswaitingand  deliveredthecocainetohim.OfficerThompsonsaidthatherecognizedDefendantsfacewhenhe  firstreviewedthevideotapeofthesale,butittookhimafewdaystodiscoverDefendantsname.    Mark_Dunlap_,aforensicscientistwiththeTennesseeBureauofInvestigation,testifiedthat T thesubstancepurchasedbyOfficerWallacefromDefendantwascocaineandweighed0.2grams. =    Defendanttestifiedthathewasnotthemaninthevideotapeanddidnotrecognizeanyofthe  _ individualsonthetape.AlthoughhecouldnotrememberwherehewasonJanuary9,2003,  H Defendantsaidthatheusuallyworkedathissistersrestaurantduringtheday.Defendantsaidthat  1  heneverworeabaseballcaplikethemaninthevideotapewore.      Defendantarguesthatthisevidenceisinsufficienttoprovethathewastheperpetratorofthe   offensebeyondareasonabledoubt.Whenadefendantchallengesthesufficiencyoftheconvicting   evidence,wemustreviewtheevidenceinthelightmostfavorabletotheprosecutionindetermining n  whetherarationaltrieroffactcouldhavefoundalltheessentialelementsofthecrimebeyonda W  reasonabledoubt.Jacksonv.Virginia,443U.S.307,319,99S.Ct.2781,2789,61L.Ed.2d560 @ (1979).Onceajuryfindsadefendantguilty,hisorherpresumptionofinnocenceisremovedand )y replacedwithapresumptionofguilt.Statev.Black,815S.W.2d166,175(Tenn.1991).The b defendanthastheburdenofovercomingthispresumption,andtheStateisentitledtothestrongest K legitimateviewoftheevidencealongwithallreasonableinferenceswhichmaybedrawnfromthat 4 evidence.Id.;Statev._Tuggle_,639S.W.2d913,914(Tenn.1982).Thejuryispresumedtohave  resolvedallconflictsanddrawnanyreasonableinferencesinfavoroftheState.Statev.Sheffield,  676S.W.2d542,547(Tenn.1984).Questionsconcerningthecredibilityofwitnesses,theweight  andvaluetobegiventheevidence,andallfactualissuesraisedbytheevidenceareresolvedbythe  trieroffactandnotthiscourt.Statev.Bland,958S.W.2d651,659(Tenn.1997). q   Asrelevanthere,itisanoffenseforapersontoknowinglydeliveracontrolledsubstance. C Tenn.CodeAnn.3917417(a)(2).Thedeliveryoflessthan0.5gramsofcocaine,aScheduleII ,| controlledsubstance,isaClassCfelony.Id.417(c)(2)(A).Ofcourse,theidentityofthe e perpetratorisanessentialelementofanycrime.SeeStatev.Thompson,519S.W.2d789,793 N (Tenn.1975).OfficerThompsonsaidthathewasfamiliarwithDefendantsfacewhenhefirst  7 reviewedthevideotapeofthesalestransaction.HelaterestablishedDefendantsnamebymatching !   themanonthevideotapewithaphotographofDefendant.AlthoughDefendantwasnotwearing " ! abaseballcapinthisphotograph,OfficerThompsontestifiedthatthefacialstructuresandhairof #" themanonthevideotapewasthesameasthatportrayedinDefendantsphotograph.Officer $# ThompsontestifiedthathehadnodoubtthatDefendantwastheonewhodeliveredthecocaineto t% $ OfficerWallace.Furthermore,OfficerWallaceidentifiedDefendantattrialasthemanwhosold ]&!% thecocaine. F'"&   Issuesofcredibilityandidentityarequestionsreservedforthejury.Thejuryhadthe )h$( opportunitytoviewthevideotapeofthesaleandassessthecredibilityofboththeStateswitnesses *Q%) andDefendantattrial.Thejury,byitsverdict,obviouslyaccreditedthetestimonyoftheStates *:&* witnessaswastheirprerogative.SeeStatev._Summerall_,926S.W.2d272,275(Tenn.Crim.App. +#'+ 1995).Inourview,theevidencewassufficientforarationaltrieroffacttohavefoundbeyonda  reasonabledoubtthatDefendantwastheindividualwhodeliveredthecrackcocainetoOfficer  Wallace.Defendantisnotentitledtoreliefonthisissue.  @GG% CONCLUSION  T   Thejudgmentofthetrialcourtisaffirmed ' w    `     h     ___________________________________  I    `     h     THOMAST.WOODALL,JUDGE   2