ÿWPCk ìkÀû ^>ç™ ?çö¯¨‘¬¤ríq‚staó;{‡C,„4Í„—8uöô—¥+7Ü^ð–«H«W`š-áLþTÏã^ˆy·-}Ûêý( jèCMaHyøðV»VŽ£Ì\ÏÕ¿Ùõ" N¶zgûµdiQ&—ûÏ:À.>‹ÛÝ‘î'$0vÓ’xÐÐûPJ'  ¡ôýü,V‡âaÕvŽ6Ú’Fõˆº¸9¿s¹cïý!(aÚ-fÛ}Ïë=›<¨N'¤ZiHºá9ˆ .E°‰ËÀ XÜp¯ ßõco‚X¡JI}¬”í(BÍ:6^CDâ:â·ÉwWGÿ<Žr‚( ±Ã"‹`ø ~Ô*îÈçgé+pc@±3§¼“=¼ÊN(õøçJIþëiJêM€” ç»áWª‰ÚLrɉ‹å Ê”„Χ éÇ,î3@íç/Ï¿ä˦Mâ)W 1>Ká¥0)Ûd#zc qß¼U»àßWøŸ;è†ï†dô—µÕhÌzßþìä~‰Ê³@|íOÍR‡{¢³ãÖ×ôŸˆ°4béóçÿ@ò£ëˆPT"A¿ŸI£?É»sH<ƈ{ℼp[bUN\ %ª 0ˆ°^ 8wD4H\ zkÒå· m¹ #ÁÐ UN‘ Æß Æ¥ Æk Æ1 0:÷N1Ã3öEþþþþþþþþþþþþþþþþþþþþþþþþb 0D>LÞŠŠ 0ëhhhh BSS 0¤p D3 D-G 0Ktt AS¿Æ 0¤Ø 0D| A«À(ÈhH  Z6Times New Roman Regular»(`£ª$¡¡Ñ€.ÑÑ8€½­»»d»»d8ÑÑ ý ÑÓ  Ó@œ,-s üPH,êÖ€€NashN3|x ˜C:\PROGRA~1\COREL\WORDPE~1\TEMPLATE\CUSTOM~1\REVISE~1.WPTC:\Program Files\Corel\WordPerfect Office 2000\Template\Custom WP Templates\revised standard opinion.wptÿU‹ÿÀÀÀ˜HP LaserJet 4000 Series PCL 6ÈÈ,,,,ÈÈ0(ÖÃ9 Z‹6Times New Roman RegularLevel 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5‚Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5„Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5…Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 54ÿÿ2Emphasisòòóó ¹Ý ƒR›à$ÝÓ  Óà  àòòÚ  Ú2Ú  ÚóóÔ€ô‡Ôò»»ÔÝ  ÝÔ_ÔJones€testified€that€most€of€the€work€Crisp€performed€on€the€house€was€included€in€this€amount.€€The€StateÐ ° Ðintroduced€into€evidence€a€photocopy,€also€introduced€at€the€first€hearing,€of€an€invoice€in€the€amount€of€$3,448.00,€andÐ tÄ Ðshowing€a€balance€owed€of€$2,648.00,€for€repairs€completed€by€Crisp.€€This€court€on€the€Appellantððs€first€appealÐ 8ˆ Ðexpressed€concern€whether€some€of€the€repairs€listed€in€this€invoice€were€done€as€a€result€of€the€fire€damage€to€theÐ üL Ðstructure.€€Upon€remand,€the€trial€court€found€that€the€Appellant€had€sufficiently€explained€that€these€repairs€were€relatedÐ À Ðto€the€fire€damage.€€The€Appellant€concedes€this€on€appeal.€€Accordingly,€we€find€it€unnecessary€to€review€this€issue.€Ð „Ô Ð - ù-(#Ã$òòÚ  Ú0Ú  Úóó 4Ý ƒR›à$ÝÓ  Óà  àòòÚ  Ú1Ú  ÚóóÔ€ô‡Ôò»»ÔÝ  ÝÔ_ÔPrior€to€the€hearing,€the€State€sent€a€letter€to€Jones€requesting€him€to€bring€all€documents€he€had€concerningÐ ° Ðthe€restitution€amount€with€him€to€the€hearing.€€At€the€hearing,€Jones€testified€that€he€ð ðfound€it€futile€to€bring€all€this€in.ðð€Ð tÄ ÐHe€also€testified€that€he€brought€a€ð ðquantityðð€of€documents€with€him€to€the€hearing,€but€these€documents€were€notÐ 8ˆ Ðproduced.€€ ÔÝ ƒR›à$ÝÓ  Óà  àòòÚ  Ú3Ú  ÚóóÔ€ô‡Ôò»»ÔÝ  ÝÔ_ÔThe€Appellant€argues€that€the€lost€rental€income€should€only€be€for€the€months€of€February€and€March.€€TheÐ ° ÐAppellant€did€not€pay€any€rent€for€the€month€of€January.€€He€contends€that€January€should€not€be€included€in€the€amountÐ tÄ Ðof€restitution€because€the€fire€occurred€on€January€12,€2000,€and€,thus,€lost€rent€for€the€month€of€January€was€not€relatedÐ 8ˆ Ðto€the€fire.€€We€find€that€January€should€be€included€in€the€amount€of€restitution€as€the€Appellant€should€not€be€exemptedÐ üL Ðfrom€payment€resulting€from€his€own€misdeed.(|G2›à$¤¤Ý ƒ£ª!ÝÑ€.ÑÑ8€/Œ»»dd8ÑÑ ý ÑÓ  ÓÝ  Ýà  àòòÚ  Ú0Ú  ÚóóÔ€ô‡Ôò»»Ô d(|3Gk$££Ý ƒ£ª!ÝÑ€.ÑÑ8€/Œ»»dd8ÑÑ ý ÑÓ  ÓÝ  ÝVVVV'ÿÿdxd)!ÈÈÈÈdxdx( ±þ$’’ò òFigure€Ú  Ú1Ú  Úó ó^_X`YEþÿ<<CÿÿƒLevel 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5(|3Gk$¢¢Ý ƒ£ª!ÝÑ€.ÑÑ8€/Œ»»dd8ÑÑ ý ÑÓ  ÓÝ  Ý($$””ò òÚ  Ú1Ú  Úó óX[Z&OLE 2.0 Box <=8ÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿCÿÿ HKKKKÝ ƒ£ª!ÝÑ€.ÑÑ8€/Œ»»ddÈ8ÑÑ ý ÑÓ  ÓÝ  ÝÔ_ÔÑ  ÑÑ  ÑÔ€¼/Œ»»»ÔÑ8€mXXdì»»d8Ñà@ttìàÔ‡î+í/ŒÔIN€THE€COURT€OF€CRIMINAL€APPEALS€OF€TENNESSEEˆÐ ° Ðà@kk$ìàAT€NASHVILLEÔ#†¼/Œ»îî+í #ԈРÖ& ÐÓ  Óà @ àà @` àAssigned€on€Briefs€August€14,€2002Ð üL ÐÔ‡XmX»¼/ŒÔÌò òÔ#†¼/Œ»XXm #ÔSTATE€OF€TENNESSEEòòóó€v.€DAVID€D.€BOTTOMSòòóóÔ‡XmX»¼/ŒÔó óÐ úJ ÐÌà@@½½ìàò ò€Appeal€from€the€Criminal€Court€for€Davidson€CountyÐ ú J Ðà@@øøìàNo.€2000„B„607€€€€€€Cheryl€Blackburn,€JudgeÐ æ 6 ÐÌÌà@@ìì*ìàßA€V) °°` d€÷E<©` AßÐ ªú  ÐÌà@@TTìàNo.€M2001„02693„CCA„R3„CD€„€Filed€September€12,€Ô_Ô2002Ô_ÔÐ ¥õ  ÐÌßA€V) °°` dE<|` AßÐ }Í  Ðó óÌÓ  ÓÔ‡ XmXXXmÔThe€Appellant,€David€D.€Bottoms,€appeals€from€the€Davidson€County€Criminal€Courtððs€order€ofÐ xÈ  Ðrestitution€following€his€conviction€for€arson.€€On€appeal,€Bottoms€argues€the€amount€of€restitutionÐ d´ Ðwas€excessive.€€Upon€òòde€novoóó€review,€we€find€that€the€victim€did€not€provide€sufficient€evidence€ofÐ P  Ðhis€pecuniary€loss€for€damages€to€the€rental€property.€€Accordingly,€the€amount€of€restitution€asÐ <Œ Ðimposed€by€the€trial€court€is€modified,€and€the€case€is€remanded€for€entry€of€a€sentencing€order€inÐ (x Ðaccordance€with€this€opinion.Ô#†XmXX XmÌ#ÔÔ#†¼/Œ»XXm˜#ÔÔ‡XmX»¼/ŒÔÐ d ÐÓÀÓÌò òTenn.€R.€App.€P.€3;€Judgment€of€the€Criminal€Court€Modified€and€Remanded.ó óÐ ì< ÐÌòòÓ  ÓÔ#†¼/Œ»àXm¦#ÔÔ‡XmX.¼/ŒÔDavid€G.€Hayes,€J.óó,€delivered€the€opinion€of€the€court,€in€which€òòJoe€G.€Rileyóó€and€òòNorma€McGeeÐ Ä ÐOgleóó,€JJ.,€joined.Ð ° ÐÌRoss€E.€Alderman,€District€Public€Defender;€C.€Dawn€Deaner,€Assistant€Public€Defender,€Nashville,Ð ˆØ ÐTennessee,€for€the€Appellant,€David€D.€Bottoms.Ð tÄ ÐÌPaul€G.€Summers,€Attorney€General€and€Reporter;€Michael€Moore,€Solicitor€General;€Kathy€D.Ð L œ ÐAslinger,€Assistant€Attorney€General;€Victor€S.€(Torry)€Johnson,€III,€District€Attorney€General;€andÐ 8!ˆ  ÐRoger€D.€Moore,€Assistant€District€Attorney€General,€for€the€Appellee,€State€of€Tennessee.Ð $"t! ÐÔ#†¼/Œ»XXm‚#ÔÔ‡XmX»¼/ŒÔÌÓSÓÌà@@OO&ìàò òOPINIONó óÔ#†¼/Œ»XXm #ÔÔ‡XmX»¼/ŒÔÐ è$8 $ ÐÌò òFactual€Backgroundó óÐ À&"& ÐòòóóÔ#†¼/Œ»XXmò #ÔÓ  ÓÔ€XmX»¼/ŒÔÌÔ‡ XmXXXmÔà  àOn€July€13,€2000,€the€Appellant€pled€guilty€to€arson,€a€class€C€felony.€€Pursuant€to€aÐ ˜(è#( Ðnegotiated€plea€agreement,€the€Appellant€received€a€four„year€sentence€as€a€Range€I€standardÐ „)Ô$) Ðoffender.€€The€manner€of€service€and€the€amount€of€restitution€was€to€be€determined€by€the€trialÐ p*À%* Ðcourt.€€Following€a€hearing,€the€trial€court€ordered€that€the€four„year€sentence€be€served€inÐ \+¬&+ Ðconfinement€in€the€workhouse.€€Additionally,€the€Appellant€was€ordered€to€pay€restitution€in€theÐ H,˜', Ðamount€of€$10,000.00€to€John€Sneed€Jones,€Jr.,€the€trustee€for€the€owner€of€the€rental€property€whichÐ 4-„(-ý Ðwas€damaged€as€a€result€of€the€arson.€€The€Appellant€appealed.€€This€court€affirmed€the€manner€ofÐ ° Ðservice€but€remanded€the€issue€of€restitution€for€a€new€hearing,€finding€that€the€victim€failed€toÐ œì Ðprovide€sufficient€evidence€of€his€total€loss.€€òòState€v.€David€D.€Bottomsóó,€No.€M2000„02080„CCA„R3„Ð ˆØ ÐCD€(Tenn.€Ô_ÔCrimÔ_Ô.€App.€at€Nashville,€May€31,€2001).€€The€relevant€facts€developed€during€theÐ tÄ ÐAppellantððs€first€appeal€are€as€follows:Ð `° ÐÌà8  àà ` àThe€defendant,€a€twenty„six„year„old€high€school€dropout,€was€living€in€aÐ 8 ˆ Ðrented€house€at€527€Raymond€Street€in€Nashville€with€his€girlfriend,€Ashley€Ô_ÔNewbyÔ_Ô,Ð $ t Ðand€their€child.€.€.€.€On€January€12,€2000,€he€was,€according€to€his€testimony,Ð  ` Ð"wasted,"€having€started€drinking€at€7:00€a.m.€He€had€argued€during€the€day€with€Ms.Ð ü L  ÐÔ_ÔNewbyÔ_Ô,€and€when€he€got€home,€she€was€at€the€home€of€a€male€friend,€Jerry€Hill.€TheÐ è 8  Ðdefendant€testified€that€"I€wanted€her€to€come€home€and€she€wouldn't€come€home."Ð Ô$  ÐThe€defendant€apparently€called€Hill's€home€and€said€that€he€was€"going€to€catch€theÐ À  Ðhouse€on€fire€and€lay€in€the€middle€of€it."€His€first€attempt€at€starting€a€fire€in€theÐ ¬ü  Ðfront€on€[sic]€the€house€was€put€out€by€other€individuals.€The€defendant's€secondÐ ˜è  Ðattempt,€according€to€the€testimony€of€James€Watkins,€an€arson€investigator€with€theÐ „Ô  ÐNashville€Fire€Department,€involved€the€deliberate€use€of€an€Ô_ÔaccelerantÔ_Ô.€€This€secondÐ pÀ Ðattempt€resulted€in€significant€fire€damage€to€the€house.€.€.€.Ð\¬Ð Ð  ÐÌà8  àà ` àFollowing€the€hearing€in€this€matter,€and€testimony€from€both€the€victim€andÐ 4„ Ðthe€defendant,€the€trial€court€concluded€that€restitution€should€be€calculated€from€theÐ  p Ð$28,000€which€the€victim€expended€in€repairs€plus€$1725€in€lost€rent€while€the€houseÐ  \ Ðwas€being€repaired.€The€judgment€form€contains€the€following€language€as€"specialÐ øH Ðconditions":€"Victim€had€$28,000€in€repairs€to€property€which€was€not€insured;€lostÐ ä4 Ðapproximately€$1725€in€rent€for€months€house€being€repaired.€Total€restitution."€ÐÐ Ð Ð  ÐÌà8  àà ` àHowever,€the€trial€court€then€concluded€that,€given€the€defendant'sÐ ¨ø Ðcircumstances,€he€would€not€be€able€to€pay€this€amount.€Accordingly,€the€trial€courtÐ ”ä Ðorally€ordered€that€the€defendant€pay€$10,000€in€restitution€following€his€release€fromÐ €Ð Ðconfinement.€Ðl¼Ð Ð  ÐÌòòIdóó.€€(footnotes€omitted).€€This€court€then€went€on€to€conclude€that€Jones€failed€to€provide€sufficient€Ð D!” Ðevidence€of€his€total€loss€based€upon€the€following€rationale:Ð 0"€  ÐÌà8  àà ` àFirst,€we€examine€the€pecuniary€loss€substantiated€by€the€record.€TheÐ $X" ÐÔ_ÔpresentenceÔ_Ô€report€contains€the€following€single€comment€concerning€restitution:Ð ô$D # Ð"The€victim,€John€S.€Jones,€Sr.,€stated€that€he€has€an€estimate€for€$28,000.00€forÐ à%0!$ Ðrepairs€to€his€property."€The€victim€testified€at€the€sentencing€hearing€concerning€hisÐ Ì&"% Ðlosses,€stating€that€he€had€completed€many€of€the€repairs€himself.€Three€items€wereÐ ¸'#& Ðsubmitted€as€evidence€concerning€the€victim's€pecuniary€losses:€(1)€a€photocopy€ofÐ ¤(ô#' Ðan€estimate€of€$28,600€for€repairs€to€the€house€at€527€Raymond€Street,€prepared€byÐ )à$( ÐJack€Crisp,€owner€of€Complete€Repair€and€Service€dated€January€17,€2000;€(2)€aÐ |*Ì%) Ðphotocopy€of€an€invoice€in€the€amount€of€$3448,€and€showing€a€balance€owed€ofÐ h+¸&* Ð$2648,€for€repairs€completed€by€Jack€Crisp€on€the€house€at€527€Raymond€Street;€andÐ ° Ð(3)€photocopies€of€nineteen€photographs€of€the€house€at€527€Raymond€Street€takenÐ œì Ðby€arson€investigator€James€Watkins.€€Mr.€Jones€testified€that€although€he€had€severalÐ ˆØ Ðother€bills€which€he€had€paid€for€repairs€and€invoices€for€materials€used,€he€did€notÐ tÄ Ðbring€these€to€the€hearing.€Ð `° ÐÐ Ð Ð  Ðà8  àà ` àWe€note€that€the€State's€proof€appeared€to€be€conflicting€as€to€the€degree€toÐ 8 ˆ Ðwhich€the€structure€was€damaged.€James€Watkins,€an€arson€investigator€with€theÐ $ t ÐNashville€Fire€Department,€agreed€that€the€damage€was€concentrated€at€the€back€ofÐ  ` Ðthe€house€and€that€there€was€"basically€minor"€damage€to€the€living€room.€The€victimÐ ü L  Ðtestified€that€"many€would€consider€[the€house]€to€be€[a€total€loss],"€but€he€repairedÐ è 8  Ðit.€When€questioned€by€the€trial€court€about€the€accuracy€of€the€$28,000€figure,€andÐ Ô$  Ðwhether€it€was€"pretty€much€accurate"€as€to€what€he€had€to€spend€for€repairs,€theÐ À  Ðvictim€said€that€it€was€"relatively€accurate."€The€victim€testified€that€he€did€much€ofÐ ¬ü  Ðthe€repair€work€himself.€He€did€not€explain€whether€his€efforts€were€in€addition€toÐ ˜è  Ðthe€approximately€$28,000€which€he€expended.€.€.€.€Ð „Ô  ÐÐ Ð Ð  Ðà8  àà ` àThe€trial€court€calculated€lost€rent€for€three€months€based€on€rent€in€theÐ \¬ Ðamount€of€$575€per€month.€The€victim€did€not€recall€exactly€when€he€had€been€ableÐ H˜ Ðto€rent€the€damaged€house€but€agreed€that€"at€least€by€the€first€of€April,€I'm€sure€itÐ 4„ Ðwas€occupied."€As€to€the€list€of€items€included€in€the€$3448€statement€from€JackÐ  p ÐCrisp€for€work€completed€as€of€March€20,€2000,€that€is,€just€prior€to€a€new€renter'sÐ  \ Ðtaking€occupancy,€it€is€unclear€whether€all€of€these€repairs€were€done€as€a€result€ofÐ øH Ðfire€damage€to€the€structure.€.€.€.Ð ä4 ÐÐ Ð Ð  Ðà8  àà ` àBased€upon€our€review€of€the€testimony€of€the€victim's€fire€loss,€we€concludeÐ ¼  Ðthat€the€evidence€presented€was€insufficient€to€establish€that€the€victim's€repair€costÐ ¨ø Ðwas€$28,000,€which€the€victim€said€was€only€"relatively€accurate."€Although€theÐ ”ä Ðvictim€said€that€he€had€other€invoices€showing€payments€for€repairs,€he€brought€onlyÐ €Ð Ðone€paid€invoice€to€the€hearing.€€A€victim€seeking€restitution€must€present€sufficientÐ l¼ Ðproof€so€that€a€trial€court€can€determine€with€some€reliability€the€amount€of€the€loss.Ð X ¨ ÐBecause€of€the€uncertainty€as€to€the€victim's€loss,€and€the€additional€considerationsÐ D!” Ðin€setting€the€total€restitution€amount,€we€cannot€€conclude€that€the€defendant€shouldÐ 0"€  Ðbe€ordered€to€pay€restitution€in€the€amount€of€$10,000.€Accordingly,€we€remand€toÐ #l! Ðthe€trial€court€for€reconsideration€as€to€the€victim's€total€loss,€as€well€as€the€court'sÐ $X" Ðorder€that€the€defendant€pay€the€sum€of€$10,000€as€restitution.€This€amount€appearsÐ ô$D # Ðto€be€excessive,€given€the€time€frame€within€which€payment€must€be€made€and€theÐ à%0!$ Ðdefendant's€limited€income.€Since€unpaid€restitution€can€be€reduced€to€a€civilÐ Ì&"% Ðjudgment,€an€order€should€be€entered€setting€out€the€amount€of€restitution€which€isÐ ¸'#& Ðto€be€paid.Ф(ô#'Ð Ð  Ðâ âÐ )à$( ÐòòId.óó€€(footnotes€omitted).€€Upon€remand,€the€trial€court€determined€that€Jones€suffered€an€actual€lossÐ ° Ðof€$22,541.01€and€again€found€the€appropriate€amount€of€restitution€to€be€$10,000.00.€€This€timelyÐ œì Ðappeal€followed.Ð ˆØ Ðâ â€ÌÓÓò òANALYSISó óÐ `° ÐÌÓ°/ÓÓÓÓ  Óà  àThe€Appellant€again€argues€that€the€trial€court€imposed€an€excessive€amount€of€restitution.Ð 8 ˆ ÐSpecifically,€he€contends€that€the€proof€was€insufficient€to€show€Jones€suffered€a€pecuniary€loss€ofÐ $ t Ð$22,541.01,€or€even€that€he€suffered€a€loss€of€$10,000.00.€€When€an€appellant€challenges€a€trialÐ  ` Ðcourt's€restitution€order,€this€court€conducts€a€Ý‚ÿÿÿÝòòÝ  Ýde€Ô_ÔnovoóóÝ‚ÿ«1ƒÝÔ_ÔÝ  Ý€review€with€a€presumption€the€trial€court'sÐ ü L  Ðdeterminations€are€correct.€€Ý‚ÿÿÿÝòòÝ  ÝÔ_ÔSeeóóÝ‚ÿt2ƒÝÔ_ÔÝ  Ý€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€40„35„401(d)€(1997);€òòState€v.€Johnsonóó,€968Ð è 8  ÐS.W.2d€883,€884€(Tenn.€Ô_ÔCrimÔ_Ô.€App.€1997).€€A€trial€court,€in€conjunction€with€a€sentence€of€totalÐ Ô$  Ðconfinement,€may€order€a€defendant€to€make€restitution€to€the€victims€of€the€offense.€€òòSee€óóTenn.Ð À  ÐCode€Ann.òò€óóðð€40„35„104(c)(2)€(1997).€€"The€purpose€of€restitution€is€not€only€to€compensate€theÐ ¬ü  Ðvictim€but€also€to€punish€and€rehabilitate€the€guilty."€€òòJohnsonóó,€968€S.W.2d€at€885€(citation€omitted).€Ð ˜è  ÐThe€standards€set€forth€in€Tennessee€Code€Annotated€ðð€40„35„304,€which€govern€restitution€inÐ „Ô  Ðconjunction€with€probation,€are€applicable€to€restitution€issues€in€cases€involving€total€confinement.€Ð pÀ ÐTenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€40„35„304(g)€(2001).€The€statute€indicates€that€the€amount€of€restitution€shouldÐ \¬ Ðbe€based€on€a€victim's€pecuniary€loss.€€òòSeeóó€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€40„35„304(b).€€Pecuniary€lossÐ H˜ Ðincludes:€Ð 4„ ÐÌà8  à(1)€All€special€damages,€but€not€general€damages,€as€substantiated€by€evidence€in€theÐ  \ Ðrecord€or€as€agreed€to€by€the€defendant;€and€Ð øH ÐÐ Ð(2)€Reasonable€out„of„pocket€expenses€incurred€by€the€victim€resulting€from€theÐ Ð  Ðfiling€of€charges€or€cooperating€in€the€investigation€and€prosecution€of€the€offense;Ð ¼  Ðprovided,€that€payment€of€special€prosecutors€shall€not€be€considered€an€out„of„Ð ¨ø Ðpocket€expense.€Ð”äÐ Ð  ÐÌTenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€40„35„304(e).€€Additionally,€"the€amount€ordered€to€be€paid€does€not€have€toÐ l¼ Ðequal€or€mirror€the€victim's€precise€pecuniary€loss."€€òòState€v.€Smithóó,€898€S.W.2d€742,€747€(Tenn.Ð X ¨ ÐÔ_ÔCrimÔ_Ô.€App.€1994),€òòperm.€to€appeal€deniedóó,€(Tenn.€1995).€€In€determining€the€appropriate€amount€ofÐ D!” Ðrestitution,€a€trial€court€must€ascertain€both€the€amount€of€the€victim's€loss€and€the€amount€which€theÐ 0"€  Ðdefendant€can€reasonably€be€expected€to€pay.€€òòId.;€see€also€óóTenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€40„35„304(d).€€Ð #l! ÐÌà  àWe€proceed€to€examine€the€pecuniary€loss€corroborated€by€the€record.€€Upon€remand,€JonesÐ ô$D # Ðtestified€that€he€did€a€ð ðgreat€dealðð€of€the€repair€work€himself€and€that€he€expended€$22,541.01€toÐ à%0!$ Ðrepair€the€rental€property€after€the€fire.€€This€amount€was€Ð Ì&"% ÐÌà8  àan€estimate€of€the€total€materials€used,€both€from€inventory€and€new€purchases,€of€allÐ ¤(ô#' Ðlabor€required€for€the€installation,€to€rebuild€including€the€big€clean„up€job€consistingÐ )à$( Ðâ âof€various€quantities€of€lumber,€drywall,€carpet,€electrical€supplies,€plumbing€repairs,Ð |*Ì%) Ðhardware,€other€miscellaneous€supplies€used€to€rebuild€the€house€after€the€clean„upÐ ° Ðof€the€fire€that€we€estimate€damaged€60%€of€the€structure.МìÐ Ð  Ðâ âÌJones€did€not€produce€any€documents€or€receipts€regarding€this€estimate€other€than€a€piece€of€yellowÐ tÄ Ðlegal€pad€paper€which€he€had€prepared€setting€forth€the€above€estimate€and€explanation.׃O×Ý ƒH#ÃÝòòÚ  Ú1Ú  ÚóóÝ  Ý×  ×€€He€furtherÐ `° Ðtestified€that€he€arrived€at€this€figure€by€estimating€the€quantities€of€materials€and€supplies€used€andÐ L œ Ðthen€priced€those€items€at€Home€Depot.€€The€only€documentation€of€actual€expenditures€for€fireÐ 8 ˆ Ðdamage€was€$3448.00€paid€to€Jack€Crisp,€owner€of€Complete€Repair€and€Service,€for€repairs€to€theÐ $ t Ðproperty.Ô_Ô׃ ×Ý ƒH#ÃÝòòÚ  Ú2Ú  ÚóóÝ  Ý×  ×Ô_Ô€€This€estimate€did€not€include€lost€rental€income€during€the€time€repairs€were€being€madeÐ  ` Ðto€the€property,€which€amounted€to€$1,725.00.׃PÄ ×Ý ƒH#ÃÝòòÚ  Ú3Ú  ÚóóÝ  Ý×  ×€€Also€introduced€into€evidence€was€a€photocopy€ofÐ ü L  Ðan€estimate€of€$28,600.00€for€repairs€to€the€rental€property€prepared€by€Crisp,€dated€January€17,Ð è 8  Ð2000.€€The€Appellant€submitted€the€only€new€item€into€evidence€upon€remand,€a€document€outliningÐ Ô$  Ðhis€present€financial€situation.€€€€€Ð À  ÐÌà  àIn€this€case,€we€again€find€that€the€evidence€presented€was€insufficient€to€establish€that€JonesððÐ ˜è  Ðrepair€costs€were€$22,541.01.€€The€evidence€at€the€second€hearing€was€no€better€than€the€first.€Ð „Ô  ÐDuring€the€first€hearing,€Jones€testified€that€he€had€other€documents€showing€payments€for€repairs,Ð pÀ Ðand€he€was€specifically€informed€to€bring€all€documents€reflecting€such€with€him€to€the€secondÐ \¬ Ðhearing.€€He€failed€to€do€so.€€At€the€first€hearing,€Jones€testified€that€he€spent€$28,600.00€to€repairÐ H˜ Ðthe€property.€€At€the€time€of€this€testimony,€he€stated€that€the€repairs€had€been€completed€and€theÐ 4„ Ðhouse€had€been€rented.€€At€the€second€hearing,€Jones€did€not€sufficiently€explain€why€his€firstÐ  p Ðestimate€was€more€than€the€present€estimate,€$22,541.01.€€Furthermore,€the€State€never€clarified€theÐ  \ Ðconflicting€proof€as€to€the€degree€to€which€the€structure€was€damaged.€€This€case€was€remandedÐ øH Ðspecifically€for€the€purpose€of€Jones€providing€additional€evidence€of€his€pecuniary€loss.€€TheÐ ä4 Ðevidence€produced€at€the€second€hearing€does€not€comply€with€this€order.€€Accordingly,€we€adoptÐ Ð  Ðâ âthe€Appellantððs€argument€and€find€that€the€appropriate€amount€of€restitution€is€$5,213.00,€whichÐ ¼  Ðincludes€the€lost€rental€income€and€the€$3,448.00€invoice€prepared€by€Crisp,€as€this€is€the€onlyÐ ° Ðevidence€which€we€find€substantiated€by€the€record.Ð œì Ðâ âÌÌò òÓ  ÓCONCLUSIONó óÐ `° ÐÌÓ  Óà  àBased€upon€the€foregoing,€we€conclude€that€the€evidence€presented€was€insufficient€toÐ 8 ˆ Ðestablish€a€pecuniary€loss€of€$22,541.01.€€Accordingly,€the€amount€of€restitution€as€imposed€by€theÐ $ t Ðtrial€court,€of€$10,000.00,€is€vacated€and€reduced€to€$5,213.00.€€The€case€is€remanded€to€the€trialÐ  ` Ðcourt€for€modification€of€the€amount€of€restitution€in€accordance€with€this€opinion.€Ð ü L  ÐÔ#†XmXX Xm© #ÔÌÌÌÌÌà  àà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  à___________________________________€Ð „Ô  Ðà  àà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  àDAVID€G.€HAYES,€JUDGE