ÿWPCt/ }ªÖ–\Ï'Ë †pÊS{6Ÿ4|7'¦xÕö)‰®ºªÑ%ËIb–5ö¶x !h~¢î•BàN1yš©=êÙ©cJä0²èÁInÏÐTE/êÔñ¹ÖBq!ÉL`[s‰[z:m ÁJIº¥fŒ_í×(Wjg/)xêš=›jÂþFƒkO50B`ND›D*çŒI{v&£Å(Ü¥)q‰Æ8¬-}rb—š’ú<ŠÞ0û™.X´õwß'4W%ñXnˆàà’”Ý´ éNâ¡ÀϽTtPÄ;‡ ì›}ž“"&ÒZ¿¨–$_Q¼5G +Ùs’`๻EÚ»M|fÜ5ëW¬¡k›\·T™¥oµ²ÛGñ“ýZ“ø}¿¬äŽ¦ÑŽŸQ”Íðôᦠ×Cøã"Í&XV&Eò’HFej9ÙÑß<+;¢¯û{z%Úè˜95.5çèJž9:wþ¸"\‡ñ ;Ó.÷›•ÝMƒ´Ðjó©ÁÙ˜TtsçBP§9ºÃ_\bñbsOó*uHŸÇñdŠ88ÓÚÄjñÐ7Ɖò9WGÄ}ør¢#‚;ºS€ÑGæÀB8vá¦ýO›b³•d/'PÔÁ01é˯­ ’ÒÖîÔ6xs))sKõAb#Á\ % N# 0ˆ% U"N­ ­ 1û zˆ Ò zÔ ÒN ^ 0 D, Æp Æ6ÆüÆÂwˆNŒ4Ž¢E±³ mµµ±Ì 72}´¯·c¯¼É 1u…´ú 72® 0"cà¿CC 0w 1‡y 72X22ŠŠ b!"1)" Z(Z(Z(Z(Z(Z(Z(Z(g*g*g*g*g*g*g*g*g*g*g*g*g*g*g*g*g*g*g*g*g*g*g*g*g*g* 0 ëo*o*o*o* BZ+Z+ 0¤w+ D5, D-P, 0K},}, ASÈ,Æ- 0¤á- 0D…. A«É.˜HP LaserJet 4,ü,,,,,ü0»(`£ª$¡¡Ñ€.ÑÑ8€½­»»d»»d8ÑÑ ý ÑÓ  Ó(í€"  Z6Times New Roman Regular0²“CEMS[cks{AutoList1(A)1.(A)(A)(A)(A)(A)(A) ˜C:\PROGRA~1\COREL\WORDPE~1\TEMPLATE\CUSTOM~1\REVISE~1.WPTC:\Program Files\Corel\WordPerfect Office 2000\Template\Custom WP Templates\revised standard opinion.wpt ˜C:\PROGRA~1\COREL\WORDPE~1\TEMPLATE\CUSTOM~1\REVISE~1.WPTC:\Program Files\Corel\WordPerfect Office 2000\Template\Custom WP Templates\revised standard opinion.wptX¯f)â (#Ã$òòÚ  Ú0Ú  ÚóóLevel 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5‚Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5„Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5…Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5•jW)ýœ3|xÿU‹ÿÀÀÀ §Ý ƒR¯™$ÝÓ  Óà  àòòÚ  Ú1Ú  ÚóóÔ€ôÔò»»ÔÝ  ÝÔ_ÔTenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€39„13„502(b)€(1997).(A) ªÝ ƒR¯™$ÝÓ  Óà  àòòÚ  Ú2Ú  ÚóóÔ€ôÔò»»ÔÝ  ÝÔ_ÔTenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€40„35„111(b)(1)€(1997). ­Ý ƒR¯™$ÝÓ  Óà  àòòÚ  Ú3Ú  ÚóóÔ€ôÔò»»ÔÝ  ÝÔ_ÔTenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€40„35„501(i)€(Supp.€1999). ¥Ý ƒR¯™$ÝÓ  Óà  àòòÚ  Ú4Ú  ÚóóÔ€ôÔò»»ÔÝ  ÝÔ_ÔTenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€39„17„1105€(1997). ²Ý ƒR¯™$ÝÓ  Óà  àòòÚ  Ú6Ú  ÚóóÔ€ôÔò»»ÔÝ  ÝÔ_ÔTenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€40„35„501(b)„(f)€(Supp.€1999).€3#37=CIQYag­­1.a.i.(1)(a)(i)1)a) ªÝ ƒR¯™$ÝÓ  Óà  àòòÚ  Ú5Ú  ÚóóÔ€ôÔò»»ÔÝ  ÝÔ_ÔTenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€40„35„111(b)(2)€(1997). i)(;3£$´´Ô2#ÔÚ  Ú0Ú  Ú.Ô3  Ôà0  à µÝ ƒR¯™$ÝÓ  Óà  àòòÚ  Ú9Ú  ÚóóÔ€ôÔò»»ÔÝ  ÝÔ_ÔAlthough€not€reflected€in€the€trial€courtððs€judgment,€we€discern€from€the€written€Waiver€of€Trial€by€Jury€andÐ ° ÐRequest€for€Acceptance€of€Plea€of€Guilty€that€the€parties€agreed€that€the€defendant€was€a€Range€I€offender€for€purposesÐ xÈ Ðof€determining€the€length€of€sentence.(Oé;$µµà0  àÔ2#ÔÚ  ÚaÚ  Ú.Ô3  Ôà0` (#(#à(EhCEKQW]cioAutoList21.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.'1. NÝ ƒR¯™$ÝÓ  Óà  àòòÚ  Ú8Ú  ÚóóÔ€ôÔò»»ÔÝ  ÝÔ_ÔOn€the€other€hand,€it€dismissed€the€stateððs€argument€that€the€sentences€could€have€been€similarly€structuredÐ ° Ðunder€the€1989€Act€by€altering€the€use€of€consecutive€and€concurrent€sentencing.€òòIdóó.€at€799„800.€€The€court€reasonedÐ xÈ Ðthat€consecutive€sentencing€using€1989€òòRange€Ióó€sentences€would€have€yielded€a€37„year,€as€opposed€to€a€70„year,Ð @ Ðeffective€Ô_Ôsentence.Ô_Ô €Ý ƒR¯™$ÝÓ  Óà  àòòÚ  Ú11Ú  ÚóóÔ€ôÔò»»ÔÝ  ÝÔ_ÔOn€order€of€this€court,€the€parties€submitted€supplemental€briefs€addressing€the€propriety€of€three€alternativeÐ ° Ðdispositions:€€(1)€setting€aside€the€petitionerððs€plea€agreement,€vacating€the€conviction€of€especially€aggravated€sexualÐ xÈ Ðexploitation€of€a€minor,€and€remanding€€to€the€trial€court€for€further€proceedings,€(2)€vacating€the€petitionerððs€convictionÐ @ Ðof€especially€aggravated€sexual€exploitation€of€a€minor€and€remanding€€to€the€trial€court€for€further€proceedings€pursuantÐ X Ðto€Tennessee€Rule€of€Criminal€Procedure€11(e)(4),€or€(3)€modifying€the€petitionerððs€sentence€to€eight€years€at€30€percentÐ Ð  Ðservice€before€release€eligibility.Ð ˜è Ð Ý ƒR¯™$ÝÓ  Óà  àòòÚ  Ú12Ú  ÚóóÔ€ôÔò»»ÔÝ  ÝÔ_ÔWe€believe€the€remedy€of€sentence€modification€is€more€appropriate€where€the€defendantððs€conviction€is€theÐ ° Ðresult€of€a€trial€on€the€merits,€rather€than€a€plea€agreement.€€òòSee,€e.g.óó,€òòState€v.€Smithóó,€891€S.W.2d€922€(Tenn.€Crim€App.Ð xÈ Ð1994).€€òòBut€cfóó.€òòState€v.€Bruce€Huffstetleróó,€No.€212€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.,€Knoxville,€Feb.€22,€1988)€(illegal€percentage€ofÐ @ Ðservice€of€sentence€modified€on€direct€appeal€where€defendant€was€convicted€pursuant€to€ð ðopenðð€guilty€plea€in€whichÐ X Ðtrial€court€determined€manner€of€service€of€eight„year€sentence).- ù- 'Ý ƒR¯™$ÝÓ  Óà  àòòÚ  Ú10Ú  ÚóóÔ€ôÔò»»ÔÝ  ÝÔ_ÔIn€so€holding,€we€are€not€unmindful€that€the€petitionerððs€plea€agreement€disposed€of€a€second€charge€againstÐ ° Ðhim,€aggravated€rape,€which€is€an€enumerated€offense€for€which€100€percent€sentence€service€is€mandated€by€CodeÐ xÈ Ðsection€40„35„501(i)(2).€€However,€the€defendantððs€guilty€plea€was€not€to€that€offense€or€any€of€the€other€offenses€toÐ @ Ðwhich€100€percent€service€applies.€€We€believe€that€the€proper€focus€is€upon€the€offense€to€which€a€plea€was€actuallyÐ X Ðentered,€not€the€offense€charged.€€€This€is€not€to€say€that€the€desired€result€could€not€be€reached€through€other,€legalÐ Ð  Ðmeans.€€For€example,€if€the€agreement€had€called€for€a€guilty€plea€on€the€aggravated€rape€count€to€the€lesser„includedÐ ˜è Ðoffense€of€aggravated€sexual€battery,€a€Class€B€felony,€with€an€eight„year€sentence€at€100€percent,€we€would€have€noÐ ` ° Ðproblem€holding€that€the€sentence€was€legal.€€Aggravated€sexual€battery€is€one€of€the€offenses€listed€in€Code€section€40„Ð ( x Ð35„501(i)(2).€€However,€we€are€constrained€to€analyze€the€plea€as€it€exists,€not€as€it€might€have€existed.€€òòSeeóó€òòMcConnellóó,Ð ð @ Ð12€S.W.3d€at€799„800€(examining€sentence€as€actually€structured€by€plea€agreement,€rather€than€whether€the€same€resultÐ ¸   Ðcould€be€reached€through€other,€permissible€means). Ý ƒR¯™$ÝÓ  Óà  àòòÚ  Ú7Ú  ÚóóÔ€ôÔò»»ÔÝ  ÝÔ_ÔWe€are€aware€that€such€claims€are€occasionally€addressed€to€trial€courts€in€the€form€of€ð ðmotionsðð€to€correctÐ ° Ðillegal€sentences.€€However,€when€the€ð ðmotionðð€is€denied,€the€movant€has€no€appeal€as€of€right.€€òòSeeóó€Tenn.€R.€App.€P.Ð xÈ Ð3(b);€òòJ.D.€Hickmanóó,€No.€E1999„02756„CCA„R3„PC,€slip€op.€at€4„5€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.,€Sept.€27,€2000). (|G2¯™$¤¤Ý ƒ£ª!ÝÑ€.ÑÑ8€¤T»»dd8ÑÑ ý ÑÓ  ÓÝ  Ýà  àòòÚ  Ú0Ú  ÚóóÔ€ôÔò»»Ô d(|3Á$££Ý ƒ£ª!ÝÑ€.ÑÑ8€¤T»»dd8ÑÑ ý ÑÓ  ÓÝ  ÝVVVV)ÿÿ!dxdx)!ÈÈÈÈdxdx( ±þ$’’ò òFigure€Ú  Ú1Ú  Úó ó^_X`YEþÿ<<CÿÿƒLevel 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5(|3Á$¢¢Ý ƒ£ª!ÝÑ€.ÑÑ8€¤T»»dd8ÑÑ ý ÑÓ  ÓÝ  Ý($$””ò òÚ  Ú1Ú  Úó óX[Z&OLE 2.0 Box <=8ÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿCÿÿ HKKKKÝ ƒ£ª!ÝÑ€.ÑÑ8€¤T»»ddÈ8ÑÑ ý ÑÓ  ÓÝ  ÝÔ_ÔÑ  ÑÑ  ÑÔ€¼¤T»»»ÔÑ8€¼“XXdð»»d8Ñà@ttìàÔ‡îëw¤TÔIN€THE€COURT€OF€CRIMINAL€APPEALS€OF€TENNESSEEˆÐ ° Ðà@WW$ìàAT€KNOXVILLEÔ#†¼¤T»îîëw #ԈРÜ, ÐÓ  Óà @ àà @` àJune€2000€SessionÐ X ÐÔ‡X¼“X»¼¤TÔÌò òÔ#†¼¤T»XX¼“#ÔWILLIAM€BOYDòòóó€v.€STATE€OF€TENNESSEEòòóóÔ‡X¼“X»¼¤TÔó óÐ  ` ÐÌà@@½½ìàò òAppeal€from€the€Criminal€Court€for€Knox€CountyÐ  h Ðà@@øøìàNo.€68808€€€€€€Richard€R.€Ô_ÔBaumgartnerÔ_Ô,€JudgeÐ  X ÐÌÌà@@ìì*ìàßA€V) °°` d€÷E<×` AßÐ Ø(  ÐÌà@@TTìàNo.€E1999„02179„CCA„R3„PCÐ ×'  ÐNovember€6,€Ô_Ô2000Ô_Ô€Ð Ç  ÐßA€V) °°` dE<¶` AßÐ ·  Ðó óÌÓ  ÓThe€petitioner,€William€Boyd,€appeals€from€the€trial€courtððs€denial€of€his€petition€for€post„convictionÐ ¶ Ðrelief.€€Boyd€alleges€that€his€eight„year€sentence€for€the€offense€of€especially€aggravated€sexualÐ ¦ö Ðexploitation€of€a€minor,€which€is€to€be€served€at€100€percent,€is€illegal.€€We€agree€that€the€sentenceÐ –æ Ðis€illegal€and€therefore€reverse€the€trial€courtððs€dismissal€of€the€post„conviction€petition,€vacate€theÐ †Ö Ðconviction€of€especially€aggravated€sexual€exploitation€of€a€minor€and€the€dismissal€of€the€chargeÐ vÆ Ðof€aggravated€rape,€and€remand€to€the€trial€court€for€further€proceedings.Ô#†¼¤T»XX¼“ƒ#ÔÔ‡X¼“X»¼¤TÔÐ f¶ ÐÌÓÑÓÌò òTenn.€R.€App.€P.€3;€Judgment€of€the€Criminal€Court€Reversed,€Conviction€Vacated€andÐ 6† ÐRemanded.ó óÐ &v ÐÌòòÓ  ÓÔ#†¼¤T»àX¼“²#ÔÔ‡X¼“X.¼¤TÔJames€Ô_ÔCurwoodÔ_Ô€Ô_ÔWittÔ_Ô,€Jr.,€J.óó,€delivered€the€opinion€of€the€court,€in€which€òòDavid€G.€Hayesóó€andÐ V ÐòòNorma€McGee€Ogle,€JJ.óó,€joined.Ð öF ÐÌJ.€Ô_ÔLiddellÔ_Ô€Kirk,€Knoxville,€Tennessee,€for€the€appellant,€William€Boyd.€Ð Ö& ÐÌPaul€G.€Summers,€Attorney€General€&€Reporter,€Clinton€J.€Morgan,€Nashville,€Tennessee,€RandallÐ ¶!  ÐE.€Ô_ÔNicholsÔ_Ô,€District€Attorney€General,€Leland€Price,€Assistant€District€Attorney€General,€for€theÐ ¦"ö! Ðappellee,€State€of€Tennessee.Ð –#æ" ÐÓˆÓÌà@@OO&ìàò òOPINIONó óÔ#†¼¤T»XX¼“·#ÔÔ‡X¼“X»¼¤TÔÐ v%Æ $ ÐÌòòóóÔ#†¼¤T»XX¼“Ö #ÔÓ  ÓÔ€X¼“X»¼¤TÔà  àà ` àThe€petitioner,€William€Boyd,€appeals€from€the€Knox€County€Criminal€CourtððsÐ V'¦"& Ðdismissal€of€his€petition€for€post„conviction€relief.€€Originally€charged€with€one€count€of€aggravatedÐ F(–#' Ðrape€and€one€count€of€especially€aggravated€sexual€exploitation€of€a€minor,€Boyd€accepted€a€pleaÐ 6)†$( Ðagreement€whereby€the€aggravated€rape€count€was€dismissed;€he€pleaded€guilty€to€especiallyÐ &*v%) Ðaggravated€sexual€exploitation€of€a€minor,€and€he€accepted€a€sentence€of€eight€years€to€be€served€atÐ +f&* Ð100€percent.€€He€now€claims€that€the€sentence€is€illegal€because€especially€aggravated€sexualÐ ,V'+ Ðexploitation€of€a€minor€is€not€one€of€the€offenses€enumerated€in€Code€sections€40„35„501(Ô_ÔiÔ_Ô)€or€39„Ð ö,F(, Ð13„523€for€which€100€percent€service€is€required.€€Boyd€seeks€modification€of€his€eight„yearÐ æ-6)-ý ÐÔ_Ôsentence€to€30€percent€service€before€parole€eligibility.€€While€we€agree€that€the€sentence€imposedÐ ° Ðis€illegal,€we€disagree€that€the€remedy€is€sentence€modification.€€Accordingly,€we€reverse€the€trialÐ  ð Ðcourtððs€dismissal€of€the€post„conviction€petition,€vacate€the€conviction€of€especially€aggravatedÐ à Ðsexual€exploitation€of€a€minor,€vacate€the€dismissal€of€the€aggravated€rape€charge,€and€remand€to€theÐ €Ð Ðtrial€court€with€instructions€to€reject€the€illegal€plea€agreement€and€for€disposition€of€the€charges€viaÐ pÀ Ða€new€plea€agreement€or€a€trial€on€the€merits.Ð ` ° ÐÌà  àà ` àThe€petitioner€was€charged€with€aggravated€rape,€a€Class€A€felony׃×Ý ƒ #ÃÝòòÚ  Ú1Ú  ÚóóÝ  Ý×  ×€which€carries€anÐ @  Ðauthorized€term€of€imprisonment€from€fifteen€to€60€years׃X×Ý ƒ #ÃÝòòÚ  Ú2Ú  ÚóóÝ  Ý×  ×€and€a€mandatory€service€rate€of€100Ð 0 € Ðpercent,׃è×Ý ƒ #ÃÝòòÚ  Ú3Ú  ÚóóÝ  Ý×  ×€and€with€especially€aggravated€sexual€exploitation€of€a€minor,€a€Class€B€felony׃x×Ý ƒ #ÃÝòòÚ  Ú4Ú  ÚóóÝ  Ý×  ×€whichÐ  p  Ðcarries€an€authorized€term€of€imprisonment€from€eight€to€30€years׃!×Ý ƒ #ÃÝòòÚ  Ú5Ú  ÚóóÝ  Ý×  ×€and€a€potential€service€rate€beforeÐ `  Ðparole€eligibility€ranging€from€twenty€to€60€percent.׃˜×Ý ƒ #ÃÝòòÚ  Ú6Ú  ÚóóÝ  Ý×  ×€€He€entered€into€a€plea€agreement€whereby€theÐ P  Ðaggravated€rape€charge€was€dropped;€he€pleaded€guilty€to€especially€aggravated€sexual€exploitationÐ ð@  Ðof€a€minor,€and€he€accepted€a€sentence€of€eight€years€at€100€percent€service.€€The€trial€court€acceptedÐ à0  Ðthe€plea€and€entered€judgment.Ð Ð  ÐÌà  àà ` àSometime€thereafter,€the€petitioner€became€disenchanted€with€his€bargain€with€theÐ ° Ðstate€and€filed€this€post„conviction€action€alleging€various€claims€related€to€the€100€percent€serviceÐ  ð Ðportion€of€his€sentence.€€Counsel€was€appointed,€and€the€matter€was€considered€by€the€trial€court.€Ð à ÐThat€court€found€that€the€petitionerððs€sentence€was€not€illegal€in€that€he€waived€any€objection€to€theÐ €Ð Ð100€percent€service€requirement€of€his€sentence€by€entry€of€his€knowing€and€voluntary€guilty€plea.€Ð pÀ ÐThe€trial€court€further€found€that€he€had€received€the€effective€assistance€of€counsel€in€the€pleaÐ `° Ðprocess.€€On€appeal,€the€petitioner€raises€only€the€issue€of€the€legality€of€his€sentence.Ð P  ÐÌà  àà ` àWe€must€initially€consider€whether€this€court€may€review€the€trial€courtððs€dismissalÐ 0€ Ðof€the€post„conviction€petition.€€Tennessee€Code€Annotated€section€40„30„203€authorizes€post„Ð  p Ðconviction€proceedings€only€for€the€purpose€of€redressing€a€constitutional€deprivation.€€Tenn.€CodeÐ ` ÐAnn.€ðð€40„30„203€(1997)€(ð ð[r]elief€.€.€.€€shall€be€granted€when€the€conviction€or€sentence€is€void€orÐ P Ðvoidable€because€of€the€abridgment€of€[a€constitutional€right]ðð).€€The€petitionerððs€claim€that€the€trialÐ ð@ Ðcourt€lacked€statutory€subject€matter€jurisdiction€to€impose€the€current€sentence€is€not€òòper€seóó€aÐ à0 Ðconstitutional€claim.€€However,€we€believe€the€petition€as€filed€alleged€a€justiciable,€constitutionalÐ Ð  Ðissue,€the€ineffective€assistance€of€trial€counsel.€€òòSeeóó€òòStrickland€v.€Washingtonóó,€466€U.S.€668,€104Ð À! ÐS.€Ct.€2052€(1984).€€Furthermore,€we€acknowledge€that€our€supreme€court€has€said€that€an€illegalÐ ° Ðsentence€may€be€corrected€ð ðat€any€time,€even€if€it€has€become€final.ðð€€òòState€v.€Mahleróó,€735€S.W.2dÐ  ð Ð226,€228€(Tenn.€1987).€€Assuming€that€ð ðany€timeðð€refers€to€any€time€when€the€defendant€is€properlyÐ à Ðbefore€the€court€which€is€empowered€to€hear€his€complaint,€òòóóthe€petitioner€was€properly€before€theÐ €Ð Ðpost„conviction€court€with€his€complaint€regarding€the€effective€assistance€of€counsel.€€òòSeeóó€òòHicksÐ pÀ Ðv.€Stateóó,€945€S.W.2d€706,€706€n.2€(Tenn.€1997)€(supreme€court€reviews€post„conviction€attack€onÐ ` ° Ðð ðillegalðð€sentence€but€comments€that€the€post„conviction€petition€alleged€ð ðcounsel€was€ineffectiveÐ P   Ðbecause€counsel€allowed€Hicks€to€receive€an€ððillegalðð€sentenceðð).€€We€are€uncertain€of€our€supremeÐ @  Ðcourtððs€rationale€in€entertaining€a€post„conviction€proceeding€òòappealóó€which€challenges€only€theÐ 0 € Ðillegal€sentence€òòper€seóó,€but€because€that€court€has€allowed€such€appeals,€at€least€when€the€petitionÐ  p  Ðalleged€constitutional€deprivations,€we€shall€not€quibble.€€òòSeeóó€òòidóó.€at€706;€òòMcConnell€v.€Stateóó,€12Ð `  ÐS.W.3d€795,€797€(Tenn.€2000).€€That€said,€we€note€in€passing,€however,€that€claims€of€illegalÐ P  Ðsentence€are€now€clearly€cognizable€in€òòhabeas€corpusóó€proceedings.€€òòSeeóó€òòJonathan€Stephenson€v.Ð ð@  ÐHoward€Carltonóó,€ð"ð€S.W.3d€ð"ð,ð"ð,€No.€E1998„00202„SC„R11„CD,€slip€op.€at€2„3€(Tenn.,€Knoxville,Ð à0  ÐSept.€21,€2000)€(writ€will€issue€when€the€court€ð ðlacked€jurisdiction€or€authority€to€sentence€aÐ Ð  Ðdefendant,ðð€and€ð ða€sentence€imposed€in€direct€contravention€of€a€statute€.€.€.€is€void€and€illegalðð€andÐ À Ðis€subject€to€òòhabeas€corpusóó€challenge).€€In€the€future,€prisoners€aggrieved€of€ð ðillegalðð€sentences€mayÐ ° Ðwell€be€advised€to€present€their€claims€via€the€òòhabeas€corpusóó€form€of€action.׃0×Ý ƒ #ÃÝòòÚ  Ú7Ú  ÚóóÝ  Ý×  ×Ð  ð ÐÌà  àà ` àGenerally,€the€Criminal€Sentencing€Reform€Act€of€1989€provides€that€the€length€ofÐ €Ð Ðan€offenderððs€sentence€is€determined€by€the€class€of€offense€he€has€committed€and€his€classificationÐ pÀ Ðwithin€various€ranges,€as€determined€by€his€prior€criminal€record.€€òòSeeóó€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€40„35„111Ð `° Ð(1997)€(authorized€terms€of€imprisonment);€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€40„35„112€(1997)€(sentence€ranges);Ð P  ÐTenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€40„35„105€to€„109€(1997)€(range€classification€of€offender);€Tenn.€Code€Ann.Ð @ Ððð€40„35„501(b)€„€(f)€(Supp.€1999)€(release€eligibility€calculation€by€percentage).€€Certain€exceptionsÐ 0€ Ðto€this€general€scheme€exist.€€One€such€exception€is€the€one€provided€by€Code€section€40„35„501(i),Ð  p Ðwhich€mandates€that€individuals€serving€sentences€for€enumerated€offenses€shall€serve€100€percentÐ ` Ðof€their€sentences€and€may€have€no€more€than€fifteen€percent€of€their€sentences€reduced€by€sentenceÐ P Ðcredits.€€Tenn€Code€Ann.òòóó€ðð€40„35„501(i)€(Supp.€1999).€€The€enumerated€offenses€areÐ ð@ ÐÌÓ€ (²“03 ÓÝ"‚#3£"ÝÝ  Ýà  àÝ‚#3£é-ÝÔ2²“Ô(Ú  ÚAÚ  Ú)Ô3  Ôà0 ` àÝ  ÝMurder€in€the€first€degree;݃#3£é-".ÝŒÐÐ ` (#` (# ÐŒÝ  ÝÝ"‚#3£"ÝÝ  Ýà  àÝ‚#3£Ú.ÝÔ2²“Ô(Ú  ÚBÚ  Ú)Ô3  Ôà0 ` àÝ  ÝMurder€in€the€second€degree;݃#3£Ú./ÝŒÐÀ!` (#` (# ÐŒÝ  ÝÝ"‚#3£"ÝÝ  Ýà  àÝ‚#3£Ì/ÝÔ2²“Ô(Ú  ÚCÚ  Ú)Ô3  Ôà0 ` àÝ  ÝEspecially€aggravated€kidnapping;݃#3£Ì/0݌а" ` (#` (# ÐŒÝ  ÝÝ"‚#3£"ÝÝ  Ýà  àÝ‚#3£Ã0ÝÔ2²“Ô(Ú  ÚDÚ  Ú)Ô3  Ôà0 ` àÝ  ÝAggravated€kidnapping;݃#3£Ã0ü0݌Р#ð!` (#` (# ÐŒÝ  ÝÝ"‚#3£"ÝÝ  Ýà  àÝ‚#3£¯1ÝÔ2²“Ô(Ú  ÚEÚ  Ú)Ô3  Ôà0 ` àÝ  ÝEspecially€aggravated€robbery;݃#3£¯1è1ÝŒÐ$à"` (#` (# ÐŒÝ  ÝÝ"‚#3£"ÝÝ  Ýà  àÝ‚#3££2ÝÔ2²“Ô(Ú  ÚFÚ  Ú)Ô3  Ôà0 ` àÝ  ÝAggravated€rape;݃#3££2Ü2݌Ѐ%Ð #` (#` (# ÐŒÝ  ÝÝ"‚#3£"ÝÝ  Ýà  àÝ‚#3£‰3ÝÔ2²“Ô(Ú  ÚGÚ  Ú)Ô3  Ôà0 ` àÝ  ÝRape;݃#3£‰3Â3ÝŒÐp&À!$` (#` (# ÐŒÝ  ÝÝ"‚#3£"ÝÝ  Ýà  àÝ‚#3£d4ÝÔ2²“Ô(Ú  ÚHÚ  Ú)Ô3  Ôà0 ` àÝ  ÝAggravated€sexual€battery;݃#3£d44ÝŒÐ`'°"%` (#` (# ÐŒÝ  ÝÝ"‚#3£"ÝÝ  Ýà  àÝ‚#3£T5ÝÔ2²“Ô(Ú  ÚIÚ  Ú)Ô3  Ôà0 ` àÝ  ÝRape€of€a€child;݃#3£T55ÝŒÐP( #&` (#` (# ÐŒÝ  ÝÝ"‚#3£ "ÝÝ  Ýà  àÝ‚#3£:6ÝÔ2²“Ô(Ú  ÚJÚ  Ú)Ô3  Ôà0 ` àÝ  ÝAggravated€arson;€or݃#3£:6s6݌а` (#` (# ÐŒÝ  ÝÝ"‚#3£ "ÝÝ  Ýà  àÝ‚#3£$7ÝÔ2²“Ô(Ú  ÚKÚ  Ú)Ô3  Ôà0 ` àÝ  ÝAggravated€child€abuse.݃#3£$7]7݌Рð` (#` (# ÐŒÝ  ÝÌòòIdóó.€€Another€of€the€exceptions€to€the€general€rule€is€found€in€Code€section€39„13„523(b),€whichÐ €Ð Ðmandates€that€individuals€with€multiple€convictions€of€rape€of€a€child€or€multiple€convictions€ofÐ pÀ Ðrape,€aggravated€rape,€or€a€combination€of€rape€and€aggravated€rape,€shall€serve€100€percent€of€theirÐ ` ° Ðsentences€without€any€reductions€whatsoever.€€òòSeeóó€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€39„13„523(b)€(Supp.€1999).Ð P   ÐÌà  àà ` àNotwithstanding€the€sentencing€scheme€of€the€Code,€a€so„called€ð ðhybridðð€sentence,Ð 0 € Ðwhereby€a€defendant€accepts€a€plea€agreement€in€which€the€length€of€incarceration€is€set€within€oneÐ  p  Ðrange,€while€the€release€eligibility€percentage€is€set€within€another€range,€is€permissible€underÐ `  ÐTennessee€law.€€òòSee€generallyóó€òòHicks€v.€Stateóó,€945€S.W.2d€706€(Tenn.€1997);€òòState€v.€Mahleróó,€735Ð P  ÐS.W.2d€226€(Tenn.1987).€€For€example,€a€defendant€whose€prior€criminal€history€qualifies€him€forÐ ð@  ÐRange€I€sentencing€might€agree€in€exchange€for€reduced€or€dismissed€charges€on€some€counts€toÐ à0  Ðaccept€a€sentence€on€another€count€with€a€Range€II€length€but€a€Range€I€release€eligibilityÐ Ð  Ðpercentage.€€òòSeeóó€òòHicksóó,€945€S.W.2d€at€706.€€Likewise,€a€defendant€who€is€eligible€for€Range€IÐ À Ðclassification€might€agree€to€plead€guilty€to€a€reduced€charge€with€a€Range€II€sentence€and€releaseÐ ° Ðeligibility€date.€€òòSeeóó€òòMahleróó,€735€S.W.2d€at€226„27.€€So€long€as€a€defendantððs€acceptance€of€suchÐ  ð Ðagreement€is€knowing€and€voluntary,€the€courts€will€uphold€the€agreement.€€òòSeeóó€òòHicksóó,€945€S.W.2dÐ à Ðat€709.€€The€defendant€is€said€to€have€waived€any€objection€to€the€irregularity€ð ðas€to€offenderÐ €Ð Ðclassification€[(sentencing€range)]€or€release€eligibility€[percentage]ðð€by€his€knowing€and€voluntaryÐ pÀ Ðguilty€plea.€€òòSeeóó€òòidóó.€€In€both€òòMahleróó€and€òòHicksóó,€the€defendant€pleaded€guilty€to€sentences€which€wereÐ `° Ðwithin€the€total€prescribed€sentencing€limits€for€the€offense€class.€€òòSeeóó€òòHicksóó,€945€S.W.2d€at€707Ð P  Ð(commenting€that,€in€òòMahleróó,€the€sentence€length€was€within€statutory€limits).Ð @ ÐÌà  àà ` àOn€the€other€hand,€an€illegal€sentence€results€when€the€parties€agree€that€the€defendantÐ  p Ðwill€serve€a€sentence€which€is€outside€the€statutorily€authorized€punishment€for€a€crime.€€òòóó€òòMcConnellÐ ` Ðv.€Stateóó,€12€S.W.3d€795,€798€(Tenn.€2000);€òòState€v.€Hamlinóó,€655€S.W.2d€200,€201€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.Ð P Ð1983).€€The€cases€applying€this€rule€have€generally€dealt€with€a€sentence€in€which€the€number€ofÐ ð@ Ðyears€imposed€is€too€great€or€too€few€in€relation€to€the€prescribed€punishment€under€the€statute.€€òòSee,Ð à0 Ðe.g.óó,€òòMcConnellóó,€12€S.W.3d€at€797,€800€(number€of€years€greater€than€statute€allowed€for€Range€IÐ Ð  Ðoffender);€òòHamlinóó,€655€S.W.2d€at€201€(number€of€years€less€than€statute€mandated).€€In€òòMcConnellóó,Ð À! Ða€proceeding€under€the€1989€Sentencing€Act,€the€high€court€vacated€the€sentence€which,€accordingÐ °"  Ðto€the€€the€plea€agreement,€was€structured€under€the€1982€Sentencing€Act.€€The€court€held€that€35„Ð  #ð! Ðyear€sentences€each€for€second€degree€murder€and€robbery€with€a€deadly€weapon€were€ð ðoutside€theÐ $à" Ðtrial€courtððs€jurisdictionðð€€because€the€maximum€Range€I€sentences€under€the€1989€Act€were€25€yearsÐ €%Ð # Ðand€twelve€years,€respectively.Ð p&À!$ ÐÌà  àà ` àWe€find€it€difficult€to€reconcile€òòMcConnellóó€with€òòHicksóó.€€McConnellððs€sentences€didÐ P( #& Ðnot,€in€fact,€exceed€the€total€range€of€possible€sentences€within€the€applicable€offense€classes.€€UnderÐ @)$' Ðthe€1989€Act,€McConnellððs€conviction€of€second€degree€murder€is€a€Class€A€felony€and€hisÐ 0*€%( Ðconviction€of€robbery€via€a€deadly€weapon€is€a€Class€B€felony.€€òòSeeóó€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðððð€40„35„118,Ð  +p&) Є111(b)(1),€(2),€„112(a)(1),€(2)€(1997).€€Although€the€maximum€sentence€for€Range€I,€Class€A€is€25Ð ,`'* Ðyears,€the€maximum€sentence€òòfor€a€Class€Aóó€offense€is€60€years.€€òòSeeóó€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðððð€40„35„Ð ° Ð111(b)(1),€„112(c)(1)€(1997).€€Although€the€maximum€sentence€for€Range€I,€Class€B€is€twelve€years,Ð  ð Ðthe€maximum€sentence€òòfor€a€Class€Bóó€offense€is€30€years.€€òòSeeóó€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€40„35„111(b)(2),Ð à Є112(c)(2)€(1997).€€McConnellððs€sentences,€by€result,€would€have€passed€muster€under€òòHicksóó,€whichÐ €Ð Ðauthorized€plea„bargaining€with€respect€to€the€ð ðoffender€classification€[(range)]€or€releaseÐ pÀ Ðeligibility.ðð€€òòHicksóó,€945€S.W.2d€at€709.€€òòMcConnellóó€even€recognizes€that€the€elements€of€ð ðoffenderÐ ` ° Ðclassification€and€release€eligibilityðð€are€proper€issues€for€plea„bargaining€and€ð ðstill€are€properlyÐ P   Ðcharacterized€as€non„jurisdictional.ðð€€òòMcConnellóó,€12€S.W.3d€at€798.€€Nevertheless,€the€òòMcConnellóóÐ @  Ðcourt€did€not€sanction€a€òòHicksòòóóóó,€non„jurisdictional€result.€€Curiously,€it€said€that€parties€are€not€freeÐ 0 € Ðto€negotiate€beyond€the€ð ðother€limitsðð€imposed€by€the€1989€Act.€€òòIdóó.€at€799.€€The€court€neverÐ  p  Ðmentioned€that€McConnellððs€sentence€could€have€been€identically€structured€under€the€1989€Act€viaÐ `  Ða€ð ðnon„jurisdictionalðð€range€reclassification.׃)×Ý ƒ #ÃÝòòÚ  Ú8Ú  ÚóóÝ  Ý×  ×Ð P  ÐÌà  àà ` àThe€òòMcConnellóó€court€cited€òòHicksóó€with€approval.€€òòIdóó.€at€797„98.€€We,€therefore,Ð à0  Ðassume€that€the€high€court€views€the€two€cases€to€be€in€harmony.€€We€see€only€one€possibility€forÐ Ð  Ðharmonizing€them.€€That€is,€it€is€immaterial€if€the€resulting€sentence€is€supportable€as€an€offender„Ð À Ðclassification/release„eligibility€function€when€the€parties€expressed€their€agreement€in€extra„Ð ° Ðjurisdictional€terms.€€Under€this€view,€McConnellððs€sentence€was€flawed€òòbecauseóó€the€parties€couched€Ð  ð Ðthe€computation€as€an€illegal€function€of€the€1982€Act,€and€Boydððs€sentence€would€be€invalidÐ à Ðbecause€the€parties€below€couched€their€agreement€in€terms€of€Code€section€40„35„501(i),€which€isÐ €Ð Ðinapplicable€to€especially€aggravated€sexual€exploitation€of€a€minor.Ð pÀ ÐÌà  àà ` àFrankly,€this€distinction€we€draw€seems€illusory,€but€òòMcConnellóó€is€the€later€case€andÐ P  Ðmust€be€considered€controlling.€€Boydððs€acceptance€of€a€sentence€to€be€served€at€100€percent€couldÐ @ Ðarguably€be€viewed€as€a€waiver€of€òòanyóó€release€eligibility€date,€as€opposed€to€a€joinder€of€especiallyÐ 0€ Ðaggravated€sexual€exploitation€of€a€minor€to€Code€section€40„35„501(i),€and€thereby€it€would€beÐ  p Ðsupportable€as€a€plea€bargain€with€respect€to€the€non„jurisdictional€matter€of€release€eligibility.€Ð ` ÐHowever,€the€parties€did€not€articulate€this€approach.€€Under€òòMcConnellóó,€the€ð ðno€release€eligibilityððÐ P Ðfor€the€offenses€enumerated€in€section€40„35„501(i)(2)€is€beyond€the€ð ðouter€limits€within€which€theÐ ð@ ÐState€and€a€defendant€are€free€to€negotiate.ðð€€òòMcConnellóó,€12€S.W.3d€at€799.Ð à0 ÐÌà  àà ` àAt€any€rate,€applying€òòMcConnellóó€to€invalidate€the€sentence€in€the€present€case€isÐ À! Ðsupported€by€the€language€of€Code€section€40„35„501.€€A€felony€sentence€ð ðto€the€department€ofÐ °"  Ðcorrection€or€to€a€local€jail€or€workhouse€òòshallóó€be€served€according€to€this€chapter.ðð€€Tenn.€CodeÐ  #ð! ÐAnn.€ðð€40„35„501(a)€(1997)€(emphasis€added).€€That€section€then€mandates€that€ð ð[r]elease€eligibility€Ð $à" Ðfor€each€defendant€sentenced€as€a€career€offender[,€Range€III€maximum,]€òòshall€occur€after€serviceÐ €%Ð # Ðof€sixty€percent€(60%)€of€the€actual€sentence€imposed.óóðð€€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€40„35„501(f)€(1997)Ð p&À!$ Ð(emphasis€added).€€Under€these€statutory€mandates,€Boyd€was€not€free€to€waive€the€establishmentÐ `'°"% Ðof€a€release€eligibility€date,€and€the€parties€were€not€free€to€extend€the€date€beyond€the€maximumÐ ° Ðprovided€by€statute.Ð  ð ÐÌà  àà ` àIn€the€present€case,€even€though€the€petitionerððs€eight„year€sentence€is€within€the€eightÐ €Ð Ðto€30€year€range€for€a€Class€B€felony,€òòseeóó€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€40„35„111(b)(2)€(1997),€and€indeedÐ pÀ Ðis€within€the€eight€to€twelve€year€range€for€a€Range€I€offender,׃$×Ý ƒ #ÃÝòòÚ  Ú9Ú  ÚóóÝ  Ý×  ×€òòseeóó€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€40„35„Ð ` ° Ð112(a)(2)€(1997),€the€100€percent€service€requirement€is€contrary€to€the€general€rule€that€sentencesÐ P   Ðshall€be€served€within€a€range€of€twenty€to€60€percent€before€parole€eligibility.€€òòSeeóó€Tenn.€Code€Ann.Ð @  Ððð€40„35„501(b)€„€(f)€(Supp.€1999).€€No€provision€of€the€Code€enumerates€especially€aggravatedÐ 0 € Ðsexual€exploitation€of€a€minor€as€an€offense€to€which€the€general€rule€does€not€apply.€€Ð  p  ÐÌà  àà ` àWe€therefore€conclude€that€the€petitionerððs€sentence€is€invalid,€notwithstanding€theÐ P  Ðplea€agreement.׃/è×Ý ƒ #ÃÝòòÚ  Ú10Ú  ÚóóÝ  Ý×  ×Ð ð@  Ðà  àà ` àÌà  àà ` àIn€the€wake€of€our€holding€that€the€petitionerððs€sentence€is€illegal,€the€question€whichÐ Ð  Ðarises€is€that€of€the€proper€remedy.׃+H ×Ý ƒ #ÃÝòòÚ  Ú11Ú  ÚóóÝ  Ý×  ×€€The€defendant€claims€that€he€does€not€desire€for€his€pleaÐ À Ðagreement€to€be€set€aside€and€advocates€that€we€modify€his€sentence€to€30€percent€service.€€The€state,Ð ° Ðon€the€other€hand,€argues€that€we€should€set€aside€the€conviction€and€either€remand€to€the€trial€courtÐ  ð Ðfor€further€proceedings€or€remand€with€instructions€for€the€court€to€proceed€in€accord€with€TennesseeÐ à ÐRule€of€Criminal€Procedure€11(e)(4).Ð €Ð Ðâ âÐ pÀ Ðà  àà ` àFirst,€we€consider€the€defendantððs€argument€that€we€should€merely€modify€his€eight„Ð ° Ðâ âyear€sentence€to€30€percent€service.€€Plea€agreements€are€often€called€ð ðplea€bargains,ðð€and€this€termÐ  ð Ðis€indicative€of€the€nature€of€such€agreements.€€As€a€general€proposition,€a€plea€agreement€is€aÐ à Ðbargained„for€exchange€between€the€state€and€the€defendant.€€In€exchange€for€the€defendantððs€pleaÐ €Ð Ðof€guilty,€the€state€often€agrees€to€drop€additional€charges,€to€reduce€the€charge€to€which€theÐ pÀ Ðdefendant€is€to€plead€guilty,€and/or€to€agree€to€a€sentencing€structure€that€is€more€favorable€than€theÐ ` ° Ðdefendant€might€otherwise€expect.€€òòSee€generallyóó€€Tenn.€R.€Crim.€P.€11(e)(1)€(concessions€whichÐ P   Ðmay€be€made€in€plea€bargaining);€òòState€v.€Pettusóó,€986€S.W.2d€540,€543€(Tenn.€1999)€(nature€of€pleaÐ @  Ðbargaining€is€ð ðgive€and€takeðð€in€order€to€reach€resolution€of€pending€charge(s)).€€In€exchange€for€theÐ 0 € Ðstateððs€concession(s),€the€defendant€may€agree€to€accept€a€conviction€and/or€sentence€which€isÐ  p  Ðdifferent€than€that€which€he€might€have€received€had€the€charge(s)€proceeded€to€trial.€€In€the€presentÐ `  Ðcase,€the€defendantððs€bargain€with€the€state€resulted€in€the€more€serious€aggravated€rape€charge€beingÐ P  Ðdismissed€in€exchange€for€the€defendantððs€guilty€plea€and€acceptance€of€an€increased€punishmentÐ ð@  Ðfor€the€less„serious€charge€of€especially€aggravated€sexual€exploitation€of€a€minor.€€Thus,€it€isÐ à0  Ðapparent€that€the€plea€agreement€benefitted€both€the€state€and€the€defendant.€€To€modify€theÐ Ð  Ðdefendantððs€sentence€to€30€percent€service€would€deprive€the€state€of€the€great€majority€of€its€bargainÐ À Ðand€would€confer€an€unjust€benefit€on€the€defendant.€€òòóóThus,€we€reject€this€alternative.׃,×Ý ƒ #ÃÝòòÚ  Ú12Ú  ÚóóÝ  Ý×  ×Ð ° ÐÌà  àà ` à€In€choosing€the€proper€disposition,€we€are€guided€by€the€procedure€that€should€haveÐ à Ðoccurred€in€the€trial€court.€€Upon€presentation€of€the€plea€agreement,€the€trial€court€should€haveÐ €Ð Ðrecognized€that€the€proposed€sentence€was€illegal.€€Thus,€the€court€should€have€rejected€theÐ pÀ Ðagreement€for€the€reasons€we€have€explained€above.€€The€court€would€then€be€obligated€to€adviseÐ `° Ðthe€defendant€of€€his€right€to€withdraw€the€plea€and€that€if€he€should€chose€not€to€withdraw€his€guiltyÐ P  Ðplea,€the€disposition€of€his€case€may€be€less€favorable€than€that€for€which€the€agreement€called.Ð @ ÐTenn.€R.€Crim.€P.€11(e)(4).€€In€the€present€case,€if€the€defendant€maintains€his€guilty€plea€toÐ 0€ Ðespecially€aggravated€sexual€exploitation€of€a€minor€count,€the€court€could€then€sentence€him€to€anyÐ  p Ðacceptable€alternative€under€the€Criminal€Sentencing€Reform€Act€of€1989.€€Because€the€court€willÐ ` Ðhave€rejected€the€proposed€agreement,€the€state€would€not€be€required€to€move€for€dismissal€of€theÐ P Ðaggravated€rape€count€as€required€under€the€terms€of€the€proposed€agreement.€€òòSee€generallyóó€Tenn.Ð ð@ ÐR.€Crim.€P.€11(e)(1)(A)€(state€may€move€for€dismissal€of€other€charges€as€part€of€plea€agreement).€Ð à0 ÐThe€defendant€would€then€face€further€prosecution€for€the€aggravated€rape€count,€which€could€beÐ Ð  Ðdisposed€of€by€another€plea€agreement€or€trial.€€On€the€other€hand,€if€the€defendant€chooses€toÐ À! Ðwithdraw€his€plea,€he€would€be€free€to€enter€into€a€different€plea€agreement€with€the€state€as€to€theÐ °"  Ðtwo€charges€against€him,€or€he€could€go€to€trial€on€the€charges€stated€in€the€indictment.€€òòSeeóó€Tenn.Ð  #ð! ÐR.€Crim.€P.€11(e)(2)€(procedure€upon€parties€reaching€a€plea€agreement).Ð $à" Ðâ âÐ €%Ð # Ðà  àà ` àAccordingly,€we€believe€the€proper€course€is€to€reverse€the€trial€courtððs€denial€of€theÐ ° Ðâ âdefendantððs€petition€for€post„conviction€relief,€to€vacate€the€defendantððs€conviction€of€especiallyÐ  ð Ðaggravated€sexual€exploitation€of€a€minor€and€its€dismissal€of€the€aggravated€rape€charge,€and€toÐ à Ðremand€to€the€trial€court€with€instructions€that€the€court€reject€the€plea€agreement€disposing€of€bothÐ €Ð Ðcharges€based€upon€the€illegality€of€the€sentence.€€The€trial€court€should€then€proceed€in€accord€withÐ pÀ ÐTennessee€Rule€of€Criminal€Procedure€11(e)(4)€on€the€offense€to€which€the€defendant€has€pleadedÐ ` ° Ðguilty.€€Because€the€present€plea€agreement€cannot€be€the€basis€for€a€valid€judgment,€it€likewiseÐ P   Ðcannot€be€the€basis€for€dismissal€of€the€aggravated€rape€charge.€€In€this€alternative,€the€aggravatedÐ @  Ðrape€charge€would€be€resolved€by€plea€agreement€or€trial.€€If€the€defendant€does€not€wish€to€persistÐ 0 € Ðin€his€plea€of€guilty€to€especially€aggravated€sexual€exploitation€of€a€minor,€then€the€matter€mayÐ  p  Ðproceed€with€both€the€aggravated€rape€and€especially€aggravated€sexual€exploitation€of€a€minorÐ `  Ðcharges€intact€and€subject€to€disposition€by€a€new€plea€agreement€or€trial€on€the€merits.€€òòAccordóóÐ P  ÐòòMcConnellóó,€12€S.W.3d€at€800;€òòDixon€v.€Stateóó,€934€S.W.2d€69,€74€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.€1996).Ð ð@  Ðà  àà ` àÌÌà  àà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  à___________________________________€Ð À Ðà  àà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  àJAMES€CURWOOD€WITT,€JR.,€JUDGE