WPC g3.{6=g'^#9s?JV{dQ_>6mq{[c|cVP6DR#1yP)MUNF % 0( U: w@ 4< P # _ j r U:W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W B D3 0D AO% t t 0D: D/~ B(9 Z 6Times New Roman RegularX($,  AZ"Arial Regular kElEmnEopEqrUseetӀ;$3|x}HP LaserJet 4SiHPPCL5MS,,,,,,0nL  XXXX SX X   Ad FILED XX S  July15,1998CecilW.CrowsonAppellateCourtClerkdAM ,cAZ"Arial Regular d%%%%'dxd(3$ !  -C<< CLevel 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5($$   1  ' dxdP Pd !  ssssXXXX  TR[A' Legal3'A' Legal3'T7fXXdd7  tr *<,(j 8` `@E` 8ttxP  rߛt@  INTHECOURTOFCRIMINALAPPEALSOFTENNESSEE  @FF'ATNASHVILLE@77%JUNE1998SESSIONDEONBRADEN, @-)  ` @-) p NO.01C019708CC00351   L   ` Appellant,@-)  8  @-) p MAURYCOUNTY     VS. @-)   @-) p HON.JIMT.HAMILTON,   STATEOFTENNESSEE, @-) p JUDGE    @-) ` Appellee.@-) p (PostConviction) d (  @(#(#( FORTHEAPPELLANT: L HERSHELLD.KOGER 131NorthFirstStreet  P.O.Box1148Pulaski,TN38478   FORTHEAPPELLEE: L JOHNKNOXWALKUP  $ AttorneyGeneralandReporter LISAA.NAYLOR   AssistantAttorneyGeneralCordellHullBuilding,2ndFloor425FifthAvenueNorthNashville,TN372430493 T.MICHAELBOTTOMS   F$ DistrictAttorneyGeneral STELLAL.HARGROVE  #' AssistantDistrictAttorneyGeneral10PublicSquareP.O.Box1619Columbia,TN384021619 L'"+ (  @( OPINIONFILED:򀀀 |.)1 REMANDEDJOEG.RILEY,JUDGE  62:   OPINION   ` Thepetitioner,DeonBraden,appealsthetrialcourt'sdenialofhispetition ` forpostconvictionrelief.Heallegeshisoriginalguiltypleawasinvoluntaryandtrialcounselrenderedineffectiveassistancebyfailingtoinformhimofthepotentialsentencehecouldreceive.Afterathoroughreviewoftherecord,weREMANDtothetrialcourtwithinstructionstossenterssssfindingsofssfactandconclusionsoflaw.ssssAlternatively,ifthetrialcourtisunabletomakefindingsoffactduetothepassageoftime,anewhearingshouldbeheld.  I.      ` ThepetitionersspledssssguiltyssonApril27,1994,tossssone(1)countofaggravatedassault,one(1)countofattemptedaggravatedassaultandtwo(2)countsofpossessionofcocaineforresale.Hewasssgivenssssssansssseffectivesentenceoffifteen(15)yearstobeservedconsecutivelywithanearliersssentenceforsssssswhichssthepetitionerwasonprobationatthetimeoftheinstantoffenses.ss ` ThesssspetitionerfiledapetitionforsspostconvictionssssreliefssonAugustssss3,1995.ssAsssshearingonthepetitionwasheldonSeptember13,1996.Thetestimonyatthehearingwasconflictingastowhethercounselmadethepetitionerawareofthepotentialsssentencessssshefaceduponpleadingguilty.ssAtsssstheconclusionofthepostconvictionhearing,thetrialcourtstated, Allright.Imgoingtoreadthistranscript,andIllgetanorderout.Noorderwasentered.OnJuly24,1997,thepetitionerfiledamotionforclarificationofjudgment.AhearingwasheldAugust5,1997,onthemotiontoclarify.Thetrialcourtruledattheconclusionofthathearing, Allright.ImgoingtooverrulethePCRanddismissit.Drawmeanorder.sskNofindingswerestated.kThesssstrialcourtthenenteredaformjudgmentwhichstatedinpertinentpart, ThisPCRhasnomeritandisdeniedandssdismissed.Therewerenofindingsbythetrialcourt.ssss 8@4:   II. `     ` ThetranscriptoftheguiltyplearevealsthatthetrialcourtdidnotadvisethepetitioneroftherangeofpunishmentfortheoffensestowhichhepledasrequiredbyTenn.R.ssCrim.ssssP.11(c)(1).However,thissslrequirementlmobligationofthetrialcourtmssssisnotconstitutionallybasedandcannotprovidethebasisforpostconvictionrelief.Sneedv.State,942S.W.2d567,568(Tenn.Crim.App.ss1996).  Nevertheless,counselshouldadviseapersonpleadingguiltyastotherangeofpunishmentheorshefaces.Afailuretodososhouldbeconsideredindeterminingwhetherthepersonreceivedeffectiveassistanceofcounsel.ssss   III.      ` ThisCourtreviewsaclaimofineffectiveassistanceofcounselunderthestandardsofBaxterv.Rose,523S.W.2d930(Tenn.1975),andStricklandv. P"  Washington,466U.S.668,104S.Ct.2052,80L.Ed.2d674(1984).The ($x" petitionerhastheburdentoprovethat(1)theattorneysperformancewasdeficient,and(2)thedeficientperformanceresultedinprejudicetothedefendantsoastodeprivehimofafairtrial.Stricklandv.Washington,466U.S. )%( at687,104S.Ct.at2064;Goadv.State,938S.W.2d363,369(Tenn.1996); +&* Overtonv.State,874S.W.2d6,11(Tenn.1994);Butlerv.State,789S.W.2d `-(, 898,899(Tenn.1990). ` InHillv.Lockhart,474U.S.52,106S.Ct.366,88L.Ed.2d203(1985),the 28.2 SupremeCourtappliedthetwopartStricklandstandardtoineffectiveassistance 404 ofcounselclaimsarisingoutofaguiltyplea.TheCourtinHillmodifiedthe 616 prejudicerequirementbyrequiringadefendanttoshowthatthereisareasonableprobabilitythat,butforcounsel'serrors,hewouldnothavepleaded H:5: guiltyandwouldhaveinsistedongoingtotrial.474U.S.at59,106S.Ct.at370.   IV.  `    ` Thetrialjudge'sfindingsoffactonpostconvictionhearingsareconclusiveonappealunlesstheevidencepreponderatesotherwise.Butlerv.  H  State,789S.W.2d898,899(Tenn.1990);Adkinsv.State,911S.W.2d334,341   (Tenn.Crim.App.1995).However,intheinstantcase,ssthennssoreossoarenoooontrialcourtfailedtomakeanynssfindingsoffactforthisCourttoreview.Thepetitionerclaimshewasnotinformedbyhisattorneyofthepossiblesssentencesssssandwouldhaveproceededtotrialifhehadbeensoinformed.Thepetitionersattorneytestifiedhecouldnotrememberwhatheadvisedthesspetitioner.mmmm   CONCLUSION   ssss   ` Thiscaseis,therefore,remandedforthetrialcourttosssetforthsssswrittenfindingsofssfactandconclusionsoflaw,sssspursuanttoTenn.CodeAnn.4030211(b),regardingthepetitionersclaimofineffectiveassistanceofcounsel.Alternatively,shouldthetrialcourtfinditselfunabletomakefindingsofssfactduetothepassageoftime,assssnewhearingshouldbesspheldpqconductedq.ssss ssrrssssssrrssssssrrssssssrrssssss 959  `     h      p _________________________ `     h      p JOEG.RILEY,JUDGECONCUR:________________________________CURWOODWITT,JUDGEssss________________________________ssLEEssssssMOORE,ssssSPECIALJUDGE