ÿWPC× ÁRj´A 4ÖƒN_E6AÙß1Ðö¢®½Eñp I²r>r’â×Ui1ÎÂ8IïBZ”¬Ç<ãU`Q:”ÄùŽ1ÙÂ&ZZ€5ÑlÇULc‹IøÝ`¦œEÙ·…á"óäÄ'ÓÎ愽¢×,ù™æHvÚÏ'!$ÓûÅ혤w{—ÚÝ?YvT˜L¬øiNc_Ø2¦Ö‘6*£Ñ\·R5å:>N®&6¿ŽÖÆ*ö4éÖC wtóúºØ‘?2Mð\*v-§÷oÒÝÿL´ófW´ô÷$…ÛÖ›ZyjÆ‚åŠ<ž-Ê.[7MyíÏhr 9Ñ-Ɖ}o¶æÓ†Lòõ_a6qÉþ†¡{}Iy_üs²ÃU4_¦î·Ubè笱Õë¨&»jI1±öz¿o(—NÄòݼ'«œ«â¾‹ ¥{g [wòhz¯öv4² Ìr‡ ¦3C˜¾ Œ»reIE“¦€‘©ßF½ˆ”ç4³ÞÐwÑ«fFcñûFmÌò´ŠL«‘aÁ< ¢†ž}"(›§Áúv€ßæ¸*åCñþ5/©9xøaÒÛ¹ó˜íÜØýÝCÂ?c`S.côÿ†®!Xm\Æá¡ ÌPz/”Ä)gõ†,ø…# F UNQ %Ÿ 0(¥ U:Í b w@ 4O c r êz U:d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d Bž ž ž ž ž D3» » » 0Dî î î î î î î î î î î î î î î î î î î î î î î î î î î î î î î î î î î î î î î î î î î î î î î î î î î î î î î î î î î î î î î î î î î î î î î î î î î î î î î î î î AO2 Æ 0DG D/‹ Bº˜HP LaserJet 4SiHPPCL5MS,ü,,,,,ü0nLhÎ(ÈhH  Z ‹6Times New Roman RegularX($¡¡,Ù¹6 AZ‹"Arial Regular- ù- ‚DƒD„D…U†e‡ˆ‰UŠD‹Ó€uM%3|x” àÔ€ X›jXXXÔÔ€ TX X›jÔÓ  Óò òÔ Ad ÔFILEDÔ€ X›jX TÔÐ  ÐÌSeptember€30,€1998ÌÌCecil€W.€CrowsonÌAppellate€Court€ClerkÔdAMÔó ó,c½¬AZ‹"Arial Regular d%%%%'ÿÿdxd(3¯$££Ý ƒ!ÝÝ  Ý€-‚ƒCþÿ<< CÿÿƒLevel 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5($$””ò òÚ  Ú1Ú  Úó ó„„'÷ÿ dxdüÿP PdÝ ƒ!ÝÝ  Ýñ†ñ›ñ†ññ†ññ}ñ›ñ}ññ†ñÑ` °ÑÒ°ÒÒX°ÒÔ€Š!¹ŠXXÔÔ€ŠFÝŠŠŠ!¹ÔÑTR[  AØ'ÿ Legal3Ø' AØ'ÿ Legalÿ3Ø'TÑÑ€ÑÑ7€•pXXdìdÈ7ÑÑ  ÑÑ  ÑÓ  Óò òñ‹ñœßr€ *<,(j 8` `€€@E f ` 8ttxPX` ð  rß›ñ‹ñIN€THE€COURT€OF€CRIMINAL€APPEALS€OF€TENNESSEEÐ `  ÐÌAT€NASHVILLEÌÌAUGUST€SESSION,€1998ÌÌÌÌÓ  ÓSTATE€OF€TENNESSEE,à À àà  à)à p àC.C.A.€NO.€01C01„9708„CR„00336Ð ` Ðà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  à)à p àó óÐ `  Ðà ` àà ¸ àAppellee,ò òà h àà À àà  à)à p àÐ `  Ðà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  à)à p àDAVIDSON€COUNTYÐ `  ÐV.à ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  à)€€€€€€€Ð `  Ðà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  à)à p àÐ `  Ðà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  à)à p àHON.€CHERYL€BLACKBURN,€ó óÐ ` Ðò òWILLIAM€BRADLEY,à h àà À àà  à)à p àJUDGE€€€€€€€ó óà x àÐ ` Ðà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àò òà  à)ó óà p àÐ ` Ðà ` àà ¸ àAppellant.à h àà À àò òà  à)à p à(HARASSMENT)€Ð ` Ðó óÌÌÌòòFOR€THE€APPELLANTóó:à h àà À àà  àòòà p àFOR€THE€APPELLEEóó:Ð Hè ÐÌò òCHARLES€GALBREATHà À àà  àà p àJOHN€KNOX€WALKUP€Ð 8 Ø Ðó ó901€Stahlman€Buildingà h àà À àà  àà p àAttorney€General€&€ReporterÐ 8!Ø ÐNashville,€TN€37201Ìò ò€€€€à ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  àà p àTIMOTHY€F.€BEHANÐ (#È Ðó óà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  àà p àAssistant€Attorney€GeneralÐ ($È Ðà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  àà p à2nd€Floor,€Cordell€Hull€BuildingÌà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  àà p à425€Fifth€Avenue€North€Ìà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  àà p àNashville,€TN€€37243ÌÌà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  àà p àò òVICTOR€S.€JOHNSON,€IIIÐ )   Ðó óà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  àà p àDistrict€Attorney€GeneralÐ *  ! ÐÌà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  àà p àò òROGER€MOORE€Ð ð+"# Ðó óà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  àà p àAssistant€District€Attorney€GeneralÐ ð,#$ Ðà0 ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  àà p àWashington€Square€€€Ð ` €%` €% Ðà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  àà p à222€Second€Avenue€North,€Suite€500Ì€à ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  àà p àNashville,€TN€37201„1649Ð Ø/x&' ÐÌœñŠñÌñŠñ›ÌÌÌOPINION€FILED€________________________ÌÌœñ‡ñCONVICTION€AND€SENTENCE€ñ‡ñAFFIRMEDñŠñ›ñŠññˆñ;€ñˆññ‰ñÌñ‰ññˆñREMANDED€FOR€ENTRY€OF€NEW€ORDERñˆñ›€ÌÌTHOMAS€T.€WOODALL,€JUDGEÐ  ˆ9(01  ÐÓ  ÓÔ€°¿ù°ŠŠFÝÔò òòòOPINIONóóó óÔ€ŠFÝŠ°°¿ùÔÐ `  ÐÌÌÓ  ÓÓÓà ` àWilliam€Bradley,€the€Defendant,€appeals€as€of€right€from€his€conviction€forÏharassment.€€In€December€1995,€Defendant€was€charged€with€harassment.€€He€wasÏtried€and€convicted€in€General€Sessions€Court,€but€appealed€to€the€Criminal€CourtÏof€Davidson€County€for€a€trial€òòdeóó€òònovoóó.€€After€waiving€his€right€to€a€trial€by€jury,Ð ö–  ÐDefendant€pled€not€guilty.€€The€trial€court€found€the€Defendant€guilty€and€sentencedÏhim€to€eleven€(11)€months,€twenty„nine€(29)€days.€€Defendant€was€to€serve€hisÏsentence€on€unsupervised€probation€pursuant€to€the€provisions€of€Tennessee€CodeÏAnnotated€section€40„35„313.€€In€his€appeal,€Defendant€argues€the€evidence€wasÏinsufficient€to€convict€the€Defendant€of€harassment€and€that€hearsay€evidence€wasÏimproperly€admitted.€€We€affirm€the€conviction€and€sentence,€but€remand€to€the€trialÏcourt€for€a€withdrawal€of€the€judgment€of€guilty€and€entry€of€an€order€in€complianceÏwith€Tennessee€Code€Annotated€section€40„35„313.ÌÌà ` àWhile€there€is€not€a€transcript€of€the€proceedings€at€trial,€pursuant€to€RuleÏ24(c)€of€the€Tennessee€Rules€of€Appellate€Procedure€a€statement€of€the€evidenceÏwas€filed€in€the€record.€€The€Defendant€first€submitted€a€statement€of€the€evidence,Ïbut€the€State€filed€an€objection€to€portions€of€this.€€As€a€result,€the€trial€court€providedÏthe€statement€including€the€testimony€of€David€Beard,€the€Defendant,€Susan€Ramey,Ïthe€Defendantððs€wife,€and€a€local€attorney.ÌÌà ` àDavid€Beard€testified€that€he€is€the€manager€of€a€mattress€store€in€BellevueÏMall€in€Nashville.€€Beard€identified€the€Defendant€as€a€customer€of€the€store€whoÏpurchased€a€Tempera€Pedic€mattress€on€June€25,€1996.€€The€Defendant€drove€toÏLexington,€Kentucky,€to€pick€up€the€mattress.€€Beardððs€store€has€a€sixty€(60)€dayÐ ¶9V01 Ðreturn€policy€with€no€questions€asked€and€the€sale€price€returned€to€the€customer.€ÏOn€November€30,€1996,€the€Defendant€called€Beard€and€asked€for€a€refund€for€theÏmattress€due€to€his€dissatisfaction.€€Beard€explained€that€no€money€would€beÏrefunded€as€the€sixty€(60)€day€period€had€expired.€€Defendant€was€upset€and€calledÏseveral€more€times€the€next€week€refusing€to€accept€Beardððs€explanation€of€theÏstoreððs€return€policy.€€Defendant€then€called€Beardððs€supervisor.€€Finally,€BeardÏadvised€Defendant€that€he€could€not€help€him€and€to€stop€calling€his€store.ÌÌà ` àDefendant€and€his€wife,€Susan€Ramey,€continued€to€repeatedly€call€the€store,Ïoften€calling€back€immediately€after€the€prior€telephone€call.€€Defendant€believed€thatÏthis€mattress€was€purchased€under€a€six€(6)€month€same€as€cash€policy.€€During€oneÏcontinuing€phone€conversation,€Defendant€threatened€Beard€that€he€would€ð ðkick€hisÏass.ðð€€Beard€stated€that€he€was€ð ðshook€upðð€and€upset€after€this€telephone€call.€€BeardÏwas€then€advised€by€his€supervisors€that€Defendant€had€also€made€threatening€andÏabusive€calls€to€them.€€On€cross„examination€Beard€admitted€that€he€had€exchangedÏmattresses€with€Defendant,€and€that€this€new€mattress€has€a€ten€(10)€yearÏguarantee.ÌÌà ` àThe€Defendant€testified€that€he€did€not€make€the€telephone€call€threatening€toÏð ðkick€[Mr.€Beardððs]€ass,ðð€but€that€George€Wesley€White€made€that€telephone€call.€€AÏcopy€of€Defendantððs€telephone€bill€was€entered€as€an€exhibit€which€indicated€multipleÏcalls€to€Beardððs€Bellevue€mattress€store.€€On€cross„examination,€Defendant€admittedÏthat€White€was€calling€upon€his€behalf€when€he€threatened€Beard.€€DefendantÏremembered€calling€on€approximately€three€(3)€occasions€requesting€his€moneyÐ  :À00 Ðback€and€looking€for€a€replacement€mattress.€€Defendant€described€his€frustrationÏin€the€inability€to€resolve€the€matter€and€felt€shunned€by€Beard.€€After€calling€theÏcorporate€offices€for€assistance,€Defendant€was€instructed€to€call€the€Bellevue€storeÏand€Beard€was€often€not€available€when€Defendant€called.€€In€his€estimation,ÏDefendant€telephoned€Dave€Fall€with€Tempera€Pedic€mattresses€asking€for€a€refundÏon€seven€(7)€to€ten€(10)€occasions.€€ÌÌà ` àSusan€Ramey€testified€that€she€was€present€when€Defendant€telephoned€theÏstore€and€never€heard€Defendant€threaten€Beard.€€Ramey€also€telephoned€Beard€atÏleast€two€(2)€or€three€(3)€times.€€Ramey€was€aware€that€White€called€and€threatenedÏto€ð ðkick€[Mr.€Beardððs]€ass,ðð€and€that€these€calls€were€made€at€Defendantððs€request.€ÏRamey€was€not€present€when€the€threatening€telephone€call€was€made€as€she€worksÏoutside€the€home€at€Baptist€Hospital.€ÌÌà ` àAn€attorney€in€Waverly,€Tennessee,€testified€that€he€has€known€Defendant€allÏhis€life.€€Based€upon€Defendantððs€reputation,€the€attorney€testified€that€he€wouldÏafford€Defendant€ð ðfull€faith€and€credit€on€his€oath€as€a€witnessðð€and€that€he€is€notÏaware€of€any€violent€tendencies€of€the€Defendant.ÌÌà ` àFollowing€the€conclusion€of€the€bench€trial,€the€trial€court€found€DefendantÏguilty€and€sentenced€him€to€serve€eleven€(11)€months,€twenty„nine€(29)€days€ofÏunsupervised€probation€pursuant€to€Tennessee€Code€Annotated€section€40„35„313.€ÏDefendant€filed€a€motion€for€new€trial,€but€the€trial€court€ruled€against€the€motion.€ÏSpecifically,€the€trial€court€ð ðheard€the€proof€in€this€case€and€was€convinced€beyondÏa€reasonable€doubt€that€the€[D]efendant€was€guilty€of€violation€of€T.C.A.€ðð€39„17„308Ð  :À00 Ðby€making€offensively€repetitious€telephone€calls€which€knowingly€annoyed€orÏalarmed€the€victim.ðð€€ÌÌà ` àWhen€an€accused€challenges€the€sufficiency€of€the€convicting€evidence,€theÏstandard€is€whether,€after€reviewing€the€evidence€in€the€light€most€favorable€to€theÏprosecution,€any€rational€trier€of€fact€could€have€found€the€essential€elements€of€theÏcrime€beyond€a€reasonable€doubt.€€òòJackson€v.€Virginiaóó,€443€U.S.€307,€319€(1979).€Ð 0  ÐOn€appeal,€the€State€is€entitled€to€the€strongest€legitimate€view€of€the€evidence€andÏall€inferences€therefrom.€€òòState€v.€Cabbageóó,€571€S.W.2d€832,€835€(Tenn.€1978).€Ð  @ ÐBecause€a€verdict€of€guilt€removes€the€presumption€of€innocence€and€replaces€it€withÏa€presumption€of€guilt,€the€accused€has€the€burden€in€this€court€of€illustrating€why€the€Ïevidence€is€insufficient€to€support€the€verdict€returned€by€the€trier€of€fact.€€òòState€v.Ð ¸X ÐTuggleóó,€639€S.W.2d€913,€914€(Tenn.€1982);€òòState€v.€Graceóó,€493€S.W.2d€474,€476€Ð À!` Ð(Tenn.€1973).€€ÌÌà ` àQuestions€concerning€the€credibility€of€the€witnesses,€the€weight€and€value€toÏbe€given€the€evidence,€as€well€as€all€factual€issues€raised€by€the€evidence,€areÏresolved€by€the€trier€of€fact,€not€this€court.€€òòState€v.€Pappasóó.€754€S.W.2d€620,€623Ð è+ˆ"" Ð(Tenn.€Crim.€App.),€òòpermóó.€òòtoóó€òòappealóó€òòdeniedóó,€òòidóó.€(Tenn.€1987).€€Nor€may€this€courtÐ ð-$$ Ðreweigh€or€reevaluate€the€evidence.€€òòCabbageóó,€571€S.W.2d€832,€835€(Tenn.€1978).€Ð ø/˜&& ÐThis€case€involved€a€bench€trial,€and€the€findings€of€the€trial€court€who€conducted€theÏproceedings€carry€the€same€weight€as€a€jury€verdict.€€òòState€v.€Tateóó,€615€S.W.2d€161,Ð 4¨** Ð162€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.€1981).€€Ìâ âÐ 8¸.. Ðà ` àA€person€commits€the€offense€of€harassment€when€he€intentionally:€(1)Ïâ âthreatens,€by€telephone€or€in€writing,€to€take€action€known€to€be€unlawful€against€anyÏperson,€and€by€this€action€knowingly€annoys€or€alarms€the€recipient;€or€(2)€placesÏone€(1)€or€more€telephone€calls€anonymously,€or€at€an€inconvenient€hour,€or€in€anÏoffensively€repetitious€manner,€or€without€a€legitimate€purpose€of€communication,Ïand€by€this€action€knowingly€annoys€or€alarms€the€recipient.€€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€39„¼17„308(a)(1)€and€(2).€€A€violation€of€this€offense€is€a€Class€A€misdemeanor.€€Tenn.ÏCode€Ann.€ðð€39„17„308(b).€€Testimony€demonstrated€that€Defendant€repeatedlyÏcalled€Beard,€even€after€being€instructed€to€stop€calling€and€that€nothing€more€couldÏbe€done€to€assist€the€Defendant.€€Beard€testified€that€Defendant€threatened€that€heÏwould€ð ðkick€his€ass,ðð€which€upset€Beard€and€ð ðshook€him€up.ðð€€While€DefendantððsÏtestimony€conflicts€with€that€of€Beardððs€as€to€who€issued€the€threats,€the€trial€courtÏresolved€all€factual€issues€raised€by€the€evidence.€€òòPappasóó,€754€S.W.2d€at€623.€€ThisÐ À!` Ðcourt€will€not€reweigh€or€reevaluate€the€evidence.€€òòCabbageóó,€571€S.W.2d€at€835.€Ð È#h ÐNotwithstanding€the€threatening€nature€of€the€telephone€calls,€Defendantððs€testimonyÏthat€he€repeatedly€called€Beard,€who€was€knowingly€alarmed€and€asked€DefendantÏto€stop€calling,€is€sufficient€for€a€reasonable€trier€of€fact€to€have€found€beyond€aÏreasonable€doubt€all€the€elements€necessary€to€convict€the€Defendant€ofÏharassment.€€This€issue€is€without€merit.ÌÌà ` àDefendant€also€contends€that€hearsay€testimony€of€others€who€told€Beard€thatÏDefendant€had€made€harassing€telephone€calls€to€them€was€inadmissible.€€BeardÏtestified€that€his€supervisors€advised€him€that€Defendant€had€also€made€abusive€andÏâ âthreatening€telephone€calls€to€them.€€There€is€no€record€that€Defendant€objected€toÐ 8¸.. Ðthis€testimony€at€trial.€€Failure€to€make€a€contemporaneous€objection€waivesÏconsideration€by€this€court€of€the€issue€on€appeal.€€Tenn.€R.€App.€P.€36(a).€€Ìâ âÌà ` àEven€considering€the€issue€on€its€merits,€the€trial€court€stated€in€its€orderÏoverruling€Defendantððs€motion€for€a€new€trial€that€its€decision€was€based€only€onÏð ðrelevant,€admissible€evidence.ðð€€The€trial€court€specifically€noted€that€it€ð ðcanÏseparate€the€ððwheat€from€the€chaffðð€in€considering€the€testimony€of€witnesses.ðð€ÏHearsay€evidence€is€not€admissible€as€evidence€unless€it€falls€within€a€number€ofÏexceptions€as€provided€by€Rules€803€and€804€of€the€Tennessee€Rules€of€Evidence.€ÏTenn.€R.€Evid.€802.€€Even€if€the€statements€to€which€Defendant€refers€were€notÏadmissible€as€exceptions€under€Rules€803€and€804,€any€error€in€admitting€theseÏstatements€in€a€bench€trial€is€harmless.€€As€the€trial€court€stated€within€its€orderÏdenying€Defendantððs€motion€for€a€new€trial,€the€courtððs€decision€was€based€onÏð ðrelevant,€admissible€evidenceðð€and€the€court€ð ðis€still€convinced€the€defendant€isÏguilty€beyond€a€reasonable€doubt.ðð€€€After€considering€the€entire€record€in€the€caseÐ Ð%p Ðòòsubóó€òòjudiceóó,€we€are€satisfied€that€if€there€was€error,€it€was€harmless.€€Tenn.€R.€App.Ð Ø'x ÐP.€36(b);€Tenn.€R.€Crim.€P.€52(a).ÌÌà ` àDefendant€was€sentenced€to€eleven€(11)€months,€twenty„nine€(29)€days€to€beÏserved€on€unsupervised€probation€pursuant€to€Tennessee€Code€Annotated€sectionÏ40„35„313,€commonly€known€as€the€ð ðjudicial€diversionðð€statute.€€Under€this€particularÏstatutory€scheme,€when€a€defendant€is€found€guilty€or€pleads€guilty€to€aÏmisdemeanor€punishable€by€imprisonment€or€a€Class€C,€D,€or€E€felony,€and€theÏdefendant€has€not€been€previously€convicted€of€a€felony€or€a€Class€A€misdemeanor,Ïthe€trial€court€may€ð ðòòwithout€entering€a€judgment€of€guiltyóó,ðð€defer€further€proceedingsÐ  :À00 Ðand€place€the€defendant€on€probation.€€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€40„35„313(a)(1)(A).€Ïñ}ñNothwithstandingñ}ññ}ñNotwithstandingñ}ñ€the€provision€of€this€statute,€the€trial€court€entered€a€judgment€ofÏguilty€in€this€case,€however€noting€under€ð ðspecial€conditionsðð€on€the€judgment€thatÏhe€was€sentenced€pursuant€to€Tennessee€Code€Annotated€section€40„35„313.€€ÌÌà ` àSince€the€explicit€language€of€Tennessee€Code€Annotated€section€40„35„313Ïprovides€that€no€ð ðjudgment€of€guiltyðð€is€to€be€entered€when€a€defendant€is€placed€onÏjudicial€diversion,€an€order€reflecting€the€offense€for€which€the€Defendant€has€beenÏfound€guilty,€the€length€of€the€sentence,€the€classification€of€the€offense,€and€all€otherÏnecessary€information€pursuant€to€the€sentencing€statutes,€other€than€a€judgmentÏof€guilty,€should€be€entered€by€the€trial€court.€€The€judgment€filed€in€this€case€isÏincorrect€and€it€is€therefore€necessary€to€remand€this€matter€to€the€trial€court€for€theÏjudgment€entered€to€be€vacated€and€for€a€proper€order€pursuant€to€the€provisions€ofÏTennessee€Code€Annotated€section€40„35„313€to€be€entered.ÌÌà ` àWe€therefore€affirm€the€conviction€and€sentence,€but€remand€this€case€for€theÏtrial€court€to€vacate€its€judgment€of€June€2,€1997€and€for€the€entry€of€an€order€inÏcompliance€with€the€specific€provisions€of€Tennessee€Code€Annotated€section€40„¼35„313.€€ÌÓÓñ†ñœñ†ññ~ñÌñ~ññ‚ñ›Ìñ‚ññ†ñ›ñ†ññ†ññ†ñà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À à____________________________________Ìà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àTHOMAS€T.€€WOODALL,€JudgeÌÌñ†ñœñ†ññƒñÌñƒññ†ñ›ñ†ññ†ññ†ññ†ñœñ†ñññÌñññ…ñÌñ…ñCONCUR:ñ†ñ›ñ†ññ†ññ†ñÌÌñ†ñœñ†ññ€ñÌñ€ññ„ñ›Ìñ„ñ___________________________________ñ†ñ›ñ†ññ†ññ†ñÌJOHN€H.€PEAY,€JudgeÌñ†ñœñ†ñññÐ  :À00 ÐññÌ___________________________________ñ†ñ›ñ†ñÌL.€T.€LAFFERTY,€Special€Judge