WPCX .tvs+o:j[j*+nvjwBe ^BM4QHs1=evㅰÕa=`Էa;CdEIKP6Tn$ Ӏ9lVޚX,Π 'RM`ɧ|ɕL(+O;{1} &js%*VI;Jf5( LꞂҤgM ,n|z Y:Rr:~5%H[SA{5V֔6\-x( \Ӹ)ڜP.YHhC=9?Q=t LX9}rH;˼+Aʁ-i,V(11jsA+ T\rR@7v\`t]Μfzsy/OVArI"eѥiR'EX4 KR$#va㉢sQmg#g]pygڔ u)b %\^ b 0nU NwD4H\ zk m U@     j #0 NU NEIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIbKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKK 0SSSS B>> 0[ D5 D-4 0Kaa AS 0 0Di A/ (`$.8dd8    ("  Z6Times New Roman Regularb.:i+003|x C:\PROGRA~1\COREL\WORDPE~1\TEMPLATE\CUSTOM~1\REVISE~1.WPTC:\Program Files\Corel\WordPerfect Office 2000\Template\Custom WP Templates\revised standard opinion.wptU(9 Z(Times New Roman  Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5\\IB01S08\KNOXCLERK3,,,,0(I Z6Times New Roman Regular- -(|G2$ !.8dd8         0   d(|3?p$ !.8dd8     VVVV)!dxdx)!dxdx( $ Figure  1  ^_X`YE<<CLevel 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5(|3?p$ !.8dd8     ($$   1  X[Z&OLE 2.0 Box <=8C HKKKK !.8dd8     _  8H9XXdd8  @tt\pINTHECOURTOFCRIMINALAPPEALSOFTENNESSEE  @WW$ATKNOXVILLE#\p+#Ԉ &   AssignedonBriefsDecember16,2003 L XH9X #XXH9)#STATEOFTENNESSEEv.SHARONJ.BREEDENXH9X  J  Direct @@ AppealfromtheCircuitCourtfor_Blount_ԀCounty  J @@Nos.C11663,C11664,andC11786"C11793D.KellyThomas,Jr.,Judge  6 @@*AV) ` dE<` A   @@TTNo.E200301237CCAR3CD   December22,_2003_   AV) ` dE<|` A }     Thedefendant,SharonJ.Breeden,appealstherevocationofherprobation.Weaffirmthejudgment x  ofthetrialcourt. d  Tenn.R.App.P.3AppealasofRight;JudgmentoftheCircuitCourtAffirmed  <   #XH9#XH9X.JoeG.Riley,J.,deliveredtheopinionofthecourt,inwhichThomasT._Woodall_andNorma d McGeeOgle,JJ.,joined. P RaymondMackGarner,DistrictPublicDefender;StaceyD._Nordquist_,AssistantDistrictPublic ( Defender(athearingandonappeal);andSteve_McEwen_,MountainCity,Tennessee(onappeal),for  theappellant,SharonJ.Breeden.  PaulG.Summers,AttorneyGeneralandReporter;DavidH._Findley_,AssistantAttorneyGeneral;  MichaelL.Flynn,DistrictAttorneyGeneral;andRockyYoung,AssistantDistrictAttorneyGeneral, t fortheappellee,StateofTennessee. ` C OPINION #XXH9r#XH9X 8!  #XXH9@ #  XH9X  InDecember1999,thedefendantpledguiltytoninecountsofmisdemeanortheftandnine #`" countsofcriminalimpersonation.Thetrialcourtimposedfourconsecutivesentencesofeleven #L# #ccddmonthsandtwentyninedays,orderedtheremainingmisdemeanorsentencestobeservedconcurrently, $8 $ #ddccandorderedthesentencesservedinsplitconfinementwiththedefendantsprobationbeginning %$!% March2000.OnJune20,2002,thetrialcourtfoundthedefendantviolatedthetermsofher &"& probationandorderedhertoserveaportionofhersentenceinincarcerationbeforereturningherto '"' probation.ShewasreleasedfromjailonNovember18,2002.OnMay12,2003,thetrialcourt (#( againrevokedherprobationandorderedhertoservetheremainderofhersentence.Thisappeal )$) followed. p*%*  4-(- _@  PROBATIONREVOCATIONHEARING     Thedefendantsprobationofficertestifiedthedefendantwasconvictedoftheftandcriminal  impersonationafterherreleasefromjailinNovember2002.Accordingtotheprobationofficer,the t defendantstoppedreportingtoherafterDecember2002. ` #ccdd  Thedefendanttestifiedshepledguiltytocriminalimpersonationandtheftforoffenses 8  committedinJanuaryandMarch2003.Sheadmittedshefailedtoreporttoherprobationofficer.She $ t #ddccsaidsheleftTennesseeanddidnotreturnuntilMarch;shedidnotattempttocontactherprobation  ` officerduringthistime.Thedefendanttoldthetrialcourt, Idontwanttobebackonprobation,  L  becauseprobationisnotgettingmeanywherebutjail.Sherequestedtobeallowedtoserveone  8  elevenmonthandtwentyninedaysentence.Sheindicatedshewasnotabletocomplywiththe $  termsofprobation.     Thetrialcourtrevokedherprobationandorderedhertoservethebalanceofhersentencein   incarceration.   @& ANALYSIS  \    XH9XXXH9Atrialcourtmayrevokeprobationandordertheimpositionoftheoriginalsentenceupona 4 findingbyapreponderanceoftheevidencethatthepersonhasviolatedaconditionofprobation.  p Tenn.CodeAnn.4035310,311(e).Thedecisiontorevokeprobationrestswithinthesound  \ discretionofthetrialcourt.Statev.Mitchell,810S.W.2d733,735(Tenn.Crim.App.1991).#XH9XX XH9z# H @*  Giventheproofintherecordbeforeus,clearlythetrialcourtdidnotabuseitsdiscretionin   revokingthedefendantsprobation.Further,thetrialcourtactedwithinitsauthorityinordering#cdddthe   defendanttoserveheroriginalsentence.SeeTenn.CodeAnn.4035310,311(e).Weaffirm#ddcdthe  judgmentofthetrialcourt.     `     h     ____________________________________ D!    `     h     JOEG.RILEY,JUDGE