ÿWPC¥ š !»ñRÂ].aË9€¬1äߘثQ©¬‹UUSúÓ ×P˜-ôš¢^ÖÔø0þwü©å»y ‰±¶|H/_­aû›IØÄ[ñ<>ù*FÄj¢´T;¼YËhÙž5“H/öñBT2:Ý}¹CU?¶Å‡ØL&;,óH¥*<Þ ó¶¨I´‰d0£H¦âVšK¦‘¸w¡6To€Y#q%ÂVÔK;ÝØßÎqZ¾Y%è½û\(úxr1ÙÑwa;GÕ5J±à …ç­ÆmëÎè«#…䬥íª³§biˆÏŒ1úã°ÀQ‚Àú’}÷ĸϽˆbq…,ù‹—=c”Ó?¾c„+?¢öîäiè“~®n€þ_^< ¾Ã׿÷Å›PyX”‘w°SQ(}kÎÊC›"ªýæ Ï•™¹×3Ä„À’<Ê0h7R› .]!­=xz¬pCºÄ©àg¾0«’;¹êöãušqê“ÔÐ_Än9ÐluyWÇ·ª”Ò¶ÍÊ#„E†ÒÌ.¥ÌÉOVüÈ‹Æ.Ù~áB=é ø7ûˆôÏsÒGD¾©ÃÿTÑJÚG¤¯X‰UñCR«ÝÖÑ–ŠÐÍwówÀ ?™Ú?ÇMü›¾„¸6®’Ëcá|{F4míØòb %\Nb 0ˆdU3Nì : zPÒÊ zœ Ò ^ è wô 4ø  Æ Æá Ƨ Æm 3N5 m7#ÁNE 0DUNUw£U@U>ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZb˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜ 0ë     B‹‹ 0¤¨ D5L D- 0K®® ASùÆL 0¤ 0D¶ A«ú»(`£ª$¡¡Ñ€.ÑÑ8€½­»»d»»d8ÑÑ ý ÑÓ  Ó(í€"  Z6Times New Roman Regularÿÿ4952-476˜C:\PROGRA~1\COREL\WORDPE~1\TEMPLATE\CUSTOM~1\REVISE~1.WPTC:\Program Files\Corel\WordPerfect Office 2000\Template\Custom WP Templates\revised standard opinion.wpt ˜C:\PROGRA~1\COREL\WORDPE~1\TEMPLATE\CUSTOM~1\REVISE~1.WPTC:\Program Files\Corel\WordPerfect Office 2000\Template\Custom WP Templates\revised standard opinion.wptVm-s 3j1,ê:i¢Ø+003|xLevel 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5‚Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5„Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5…Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5ÿU‹ÿÀÀÀ˜HP LaserJet 4050ÈÈÈÈÈÈÈÈ0(#Ã$òòÚ  Ú0Ú  Úóó(ÖÃ9 Z‹6Times New Roman Regular mÝ ƒR…à$ÝÓ  Óà  àòòÚ  Ú1Ú  ÚóóÔ€ôºò»»ÔÝ  ÝÔ_Ô€The€appellant€illegally€issued€the€following€controlled€substances:€Ô_ÔDarvocetÔ_Ô,€Schedule€IV;€Ô_ÔLortabÔ_Ô,€ScheduleÐ ° ÐIII;€Diazepam,€Schedule€IV;€Ô_ÔLorazepamÔ_Ô,€Schedule€IV;€Ô_ÔButalbitalÔ_Ô,€Schedule€IV;€Ô_ÔAlprozolamÔ_Ô,€Schedule€IV;€Ô_ÔLorcetÔ_Ô,Ð tÄ ÐSchedule€III;€and€Propoxyphene,€Schedule€IV.(ÖÃ9 Z‹(Times New Roman ô\  `‹&Times New Roman- ù-(|G2…à$¤¤Ý ƒ£ª!ÝÑ€.ÑÑ8€õ»»dd8ÑÑ ý ÑÓ  ÓÝ  Ýà  àòòÚ  Ú0Ú  ÚóóÔ€ôºò»»Ô d(|3~$££Ý ƒ£ª!ÝÑ€.ÑÑ8€õ»»dd8ÑÑ ý ÑÓ  ÓÝ  ÝVVVV)ÿÿ!dxdx)!ÈÈÈÈdxdx( ±þ$’’ò òFigure€Ú  Ú1Ú  Úó ó^_X`YEþÿ<<CÿÿƒLevel 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5(|3~$¢¢Ý ƒ£ª!ÝÑ€.ÑÑ8€õ»»dd8ÑÑ ý ÑÓ  ÓÝ  Ý($$””ò òÚ  Ú1Ú  Úó óX[Z&OLE 2.0 Box <=8ÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿCÿÿ HKKKKÝ ƒ£ª!ÝÑ€.ÑÑ8€õ»»ddÈ8ÑÑ ý ÑÓ  ÓÝ  ÝÔ_ÔÑ  ÑÑ  ÑÔ€¼õ»»»ÔÑ8€^ XXdì»»d8Ñà@ttìàÔ‡î$õÔIN€THE€COURT€OF€CRIMINAL€APPEALS€OF€TENNESSEEˆÐ ° Ðà@WW$ìàAT€KNOXVILLEÔ#†¼õ»îî$ #ԈРÖ& ÐÓ  Óà @ àà @` à€May€21,€2002€SessionÐ üL ÐÔ‡X^ X»¼õÔÌò òÔ#†¼õ»XX^ #ÔòòSTATE€OF€TENNESSEEóó€v.€òòóóJOHN€BRIGGSÔ‡X^ X»¼õÔó óÐ úJ ÐÌà@@½½ìàò òDirect€Appeal€from€the€Criminal€Court€for€Sullivan€CountyÐ ú J Ðà@@øøìàNo.€S44818€€€€€€R.€Jerry€Beck,€JudgeÐ æ 6 ÐÌÌà@@ìì*ìàßA€V) °°` d€÷E<©` AßÐ ªú  ÐÌà@@TTìàNo.€E2001„01933„CCA„R3„CDÐ ¥õ  ÐNovember€13,€Ô_Ô2002Ô_ÔÐ ‘á  ÐßA€V) °°` dE<|` AßÐ }Í  Ðó óÌÓ  ÓThe€appellant,€John€Briggs,€a€pharmacist,€pled€guilty€in€the€Sullivan€County€Criminal€Court€toÐ xÈ  Ðsixteen€counts€of€unlawfully€dispensing€a€controlled€substance.€€The€trial€court€sentenced€theÐ d´ Ðappellant€to€a€total€effective€sentence€of€twenty€years€incarceration€in€the€Tennessee€Department€ofÐ P  ÐCorrection,€with€all€but€eight€years€to€be€served€on€probation.€€On€appeal,€the€appellant€argues€thatÐ <Œ Ðthe€trial€court€erred€in€denying€full€probation.€€Upon€review€of€the€record€and€the€partiesðð€briefs,€weÐ (x Ðaffirm€the€judgment€of€the€trial€court.€€€€Ð d ÐÓ·ÓÌò òTenn.€R.€App.€P.€3€Appeal€as€of€Right;€Judgment€of€the€Criminal€Court€is€Affirmed.ó óÐ ì< ÐÌòòÓ  ÓÔ#†¼õ»àX^ †#ÔÔ‡X^ X.¼õÔNorma€McGee€Ogle,€J.óó,€delivered€the€opinion€of€the€court,€in€which€òòThomas€T.€Ô_ÔWoodallÔ_Ôóó€andÐ Ä ÐòòJohn€Everett€Williams,€JJ.óó,€joined.Ð ° ÐÌR.€Wayne€Ô_ÔCulbertsonÔ_Ô,€Kingsport,€Tennessee,€for€the€appellant,€John€Briggs.Ð ˆØ ÐÌPaul€G.€Summers,€Attorney€General€and€Reporter;€Kathy€D.€Ô_ÔAslingerÔ_Ô,€Assistant€Attorney€General;Ð `° ÐH.€Greeley€Wells,€Jr.,€District€Attorney€General;€and€Joseph€Eugene€Perrin,€Assistant€DistrictÐ L œ ÐAttorney€General,€for€the€appellee,€State€of€Tennessee.Ð 8!ˆ  ÐÓÝÓÌà@@OO&ìàò òOPINIONó óÔ#†¼õ»XX^ #ÔÔ‡X^ X»¼õÔÐ #`" ÐÌòòóóÔ#†¼õ»XX^ % #ÔÔ‡X^ X»¼õÔÓ  Óà@ööìàòòò òI.€€€Factual€Backgroundó óóóÔ#†¼õ»XX^ ƒ #ÔÔ€X^ X»¼õԈРè$8 $ Ðà  àà ` àOn€February€9,€2001,€the€appellant€pled€guilty€to€sixteen€counts€of€unlawfullyÐ Ô%$!% Ðdispensing€a€controlled€substance,€Class€D€felonies.€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€53„11„401(a)(1)€(1997).€€TheÐ À&"& Ðappellant,€a€pharmacist,€owned€Stone€Drive€Pharmacy€in€Kingsport.€€Between€February€1,€1997,€andÐ ¬'ü"' ÐMay€6,€2000,€the€appellant€filled€ð ðover€eleven€hundred€(1100)€prescriptions€that€were€notÐ ˜(è#( Ðauthorized,ðð€dispensing€a€total€of€ð ðapproximately€a€hundred€and€forty€thousand€(140,000)€pillsðð€toÐ „)Ô$) Ðat€least€sixteen€different€individuals.€€Specifically,€the€charges€alleged€the€following€offenses:Ð p*À%* ÐÌà  àà ` àà ¸ àòòNameóóà0  àà0h(#(#àòòNumber€of€Falsified€Prescriptionsóóà0 h(#h(#àòòPills€Dispensedóóà0@ø x(#x(#àÐH,˜', (# (# Ðà  àCount€1:€à0 ¸ àJames€Greeneà0h¸ (#¸ (#àà0Àh(#h(#à368à0À(#À(#àà0p(#(#àà0Èp(#p(#àà0 È(#È(#à70,000€Ô_ÔDarvocetÔ_ÔÐ#4-„(- (# (#ýø #Ðà  àà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À à201à0  àà0p(#(#àà0Èp(#p(#àà0 È(#È(#à20,000€Ô_ÔLortabÔ_Ôа (# (# Ðà  àCount€2:à0 ¸ àJudy€Greeneà0h¸ (#¸ (#àà0Àh(#h(#à17à0À(#À(#àà0p(#(#àà0Èp(#p(#àà0 È(#È(#à475€Ô_ÔLortabÔ_ÔМì (# (# Ðà  àà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À à9à0  àà0p(#(#àà0Èp(#p(#àà0 È(#È(#à540€Ô_ÔDarvocetÔ_ÔÐˆØ (# (# Ðà  àCount€3:à0 ¸ àPhil€Ô_ÔRaderÔ_Ôà0h¸ (#¸ (#àà0Àh(#h(#à28à0À(#À(#àà0p(#(#àà0Èp(#p(#àà0 È(#È(#à3,200€Ô_ÔDarvocetÔ_ÔÐtÄ (# (# Ðà  àCount€4:à0 ¸ àJeffrey€Ô_ÔKilgoreÔ_Ôà0À¸ (#¸ (#à51à0À(#À(#àà0p(#(#àà0Èp(#p(#àà0 È(#È(#à3,060€Ô_ÔLortabÔ_ÔÐ`° (# (# Ðà  àCount€5:à0 ¸ àBobby€Mooreà0h¸ (#¸ (#àà0Àh(#h(#à40à0À(#À(#àà0p(#(#àà0Èp(#p(#àà0 È(#È(#à1,600€Ô_ÔLortabÔ_ÔÐL œ (# (# Ðà  àCount€6:à0 ¸ àHenry€Andersonà0À¸ (#¸ (#à73à0À(#À(#àà0p(#(#àà0Èp(#p(#àà0 È(#È(#à1,095€DiazepamÐ8 ˆ (# (# Ðà  àCount€7:à0 ¸ àMarilyn€Mullinsà0À¸ (#¸ (#à17à0À(#À(#àà0p(#(#àà0Èp(#p(#àà0 È(#È(#à1,340€DiazepamÐ$ t (# (# Ðà  àCount€8:à0 ¸ àPeggy€Sandersà0À¸ (#¸ (#à36à0À(#À(#àà0p(#(#àà0Èp(#p(#àà0 È(#È(#à1,620€DiazepamÐ ` (# (# Ðà  àCount€9:à0 ¸ àDean€Ô_ÔHensleyÔ_Ôà0h¸ (#¸ (#àà0Àh(#h(#à10à0À(#À(#àà0p(#(#àà0Èp(#p(#àà0 È(#È(#à1,000€Ô_ÔLorazepamÔ_ÔÐü L  (# (# Ðà  àCount€10:à0 ¸ àThomas€Ô_ÔKetronÔ_Ôà0À¸ (#¸ (#à41à0À(#À(#àà0p(#(#àà0Èp(#p(#àà0 È(#È(#à4,100€Ô_ÔLorazepamÔ_Ôà0@’!È(#È(#àÐè 8  (# (# Ðà  àCount€11:à0 ¸ àJonathan€Ô_ÔHugheyÔ_Ôà0À¸ (#¸ (#à3à0À(#À(#àà0p(#(#àà0Èp(#p(#àà0 È(#È(#à1,440€Ô_ÔLortabÔ_ÔÐÔ$  (# (# Ðà  àCount€12:à0 ¸ àPatty€Street€Owensà0À¸ (#¸ (#à36à0À(#À(#àà0p(#(#àà0Èp(#p(#àà0 È(#È(#à2,540€Ô_ÔButalbitalÔ_ÔÐÀ  (# (# Ðà  àCount€13:à0 ¸ àCora€Ô_ÔDockeryÔ_Ôà0h¸ (#¸ (#àà0Àh(#h(#à60à0À(#À(#àà0p(#(#àà0Èp(#p(#àà0 È(#È(#à1,800€Ô_ÔAlprazolamÔ_ÔЬü  (# (# Ðà  àCount€14:à0 ¸ àMamie€Trentà0h¸ (#¸ (#àà0Àh(#h(#à90à0À(#À(#àà0p(#(#àà0Èp(#p(#àà0 È(#È(#à9,000€Ô_ÔLorcetÔ_ÔÐ˜è  (# (# Ðà  àCount€15:à0 ¸ àJudith€Ô_ÔGilreathÔ_Ôà0À¸ (#¸ (#à29à0À(#À(#àà0p(#(#àà0Èp(#p(#àà0 È(#È(#à3,300€PropoxypheneÐ„Ô  (# (# Ðà  àCount€16:à0 ¸ àÔ_ÔTraciÔ_Ô€Trentà0h¸ (#¸ (#àà0Àh(#h(#àð!ðà0À(#À(#àà0p(#(#àà0Èp(#p(#àà0 È(#È(#àð!ð€Ô_ÔDarvocetÔ_ÔÐpÀ (# (# ÐÔ_ÔÔ_ÔÌAll€of€the€pills€dispensed€were€either€Schedule€III€or€Schedule€IV€substances.Ô_Ô׃×Ý ƒ#ÃÝòòÚ  Ú1Ú  ÚóóÝ  Ý×  ×Ô_Ô€€The€appellantððs€wife,Ð H˜ Ðwho€also€worked€at€the€pharmacy,€assisted€in€the€dispensation€of€the€controlled€substances.€€The€pleaÐ 4„ Ðagreement€stipulated€that€the€appellant€would€be€sentenced€as€a€standard€Range€I€offender,€with€aÐ  p Ðrelease€eligibility€of€thirty€percent€(30%),€and€would€receive€a€sentence€of€four€years€incarcerationÐ  \ Ðon€each€count.€€Furthermore,€the€agreement€provided€that€the€sentences€on€counts€one€through€fiveÐ øH Ðwould€run€consecutively;€the€sentences€on€counts€six€through€sixteen€would€run€concurrently€withÐ ä4 Ðeach€other€and€with€count€five€for€a€total€effective€sentence€of€twenty€years.€€The€plea€agreementÐ Ð  Ðprovided€that€the€decision€regarding€alternative€sentencing€would€be€determined€by€the€trial€court.€Ð ¼  ÐAdditionally,€the€appellant€was€fined€one€thousand€dollars€($1,000)€on€each€count€for€a€total€fine€ofÐ ¨ø Ðsixteen€thousand€dollars€($16,000).€€Ð ”ä ÐÌà  àà ` àOn€July€13,€2001,€the€trial€court€held€a€probation€hearing.€€Both€the€State€and€theÐ l¼ Ðappellant€relied€on€the€information€presented€at€the€guilty€plea€hearing€and€on€the€informationÐ X ¨ Ðcontained€in€the€appellantððs€Ô_ÔpresentenceÔ_Ô€report.€€Additionally,€the€appellant€presented€fifty„sevenÐ D!” Ðletters€and€petitions€from€members€of€the€community€asking€the€court€for€leniency€in€sentencing€theÐ 0"€  Ðappellant.€€Moreover,€the€appellant€informed€the€court€that,€because€of€fines€and€forfeitures,€he€hadÐ #l! Ðsold€his€business€and€paid€ninety„seven€thousand,€four€hundred€and€twenty€dollars€($97,420)€intoÐ $X" Ðthe€registry€of€the€court.€€As€a€condition€of€his€plea,€the€appellant€had€also€forfeited€his€pharmacistððsÐ ô$D # Ðlicense.€€Ð à%0!$ Ðâ âÐ Ì&"% Ðà  àà ` àIn€examining€the€appellantððs€suitability€for€probation,€the€trial€court€acknowledgedÐ ° Ðâ âthat€the€appellant€was€presumed€to€be€a€favorable€candidate€for€alternative€sentencing.€€As€a€positiveÐ œì Ðfactor,€the€trial€court€recognized€that,€similar€to€many€professionals,€the€appellant€had€been€involvedÐ ˆØ Ðin€service€to€his€community.€€Further,€the€appellant€possessed€no€previous€criminal€record,€was€aÐ tÄ ÐÔ_Ôdeacon€at€the€largest€church€in€Kingsport,€enjoyed€the€support€of€his€family€and€the€community,Ð `° Ðcooperated€with€the€police,€and€underwent€rehabilitation€for€his€substance€addiction.€€However,€theÐ L œ Ðtrial€court€noted€the€need€for€deterrence€and€the€need€to€avoid€depreciating€the€seriousness€of€theÐ 8 ˆ Ðoffense.€€Accordingly,€the€trial€court€denied€probation€for€the€appellant€on€counts€one€and€two,€butÐ $ t Ðgranted€the€appellant€probation€on€counts€three€through€sixteen,€resulting€in€a€total€of€eight€years€inÐ  ` Ðconfinement€with€release€eligibility€after€service€of€thirty€percent€(30%)€of€the€sentence.€€TheÐ ü L  Ðappellant€timely€appealed€this€ruling.Ð è 8  ÐÌà@éé$ìàòòò òII.€€Analysisóóó óˆÐ À  Ðà  àà ` àÔ‡X^ XXX^ ÔThis€court€will€review€the€appellantððs€challenge€to€the€manner€of€service€of€hisÐ ¬ü  Ðsentences€de€novo.€€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€40„35„401(d)€(1997).€€However,€because€we€conclude€thatÐ ˜è  Ðthe€trial€court€carefully€and€thoroughly€considered€the€sentencing€principles€and€all€relevant€facts€andÐ „Ô  Ðcircumstances,€this€court€will€accord€the€trial€courtððs€determinations€a€presumption€of€correctness.€Ð pÀ ÐòòId.óó;€òòState€v.€Claboóó,€905€S.W.2d€197,€205€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.€1995)Ô#†X^ XXX^ /#ÔÔ‡X^ XXX^ Ôòòóó.€€In€any€event,€the€burden€is€onÐ \¬ Ðthe€appellant€to€demonstrate€the€impropriety€of€his€sentences.€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€40„35„401,Ð H˜ ÐSentencing€Commission€Comments;€òòsee€alsoóó€òòState€v.€Griffinóó,€914€S.W.2d€564,€567€(Tenn.€Crim.Ð 4„ ÐApp.€1995).Ô#†X^ XXX^ n1#ÔÔ‡X^ XXX^ ÔÐ  p ÐÌà  àà ` àWe€must€consider€the€following€factors€in€the€course€of€our€de€novo€review:€(1)€theÐ øH Ðevidence,€if€any,€received€at€the€trial€and€the€sentencing€hearing;€(2)€the€presentence€report;€(3)€theÐ ä4 Ðprinciples€of€sentencing€and€arguments€as€to€sentencing€alternatives;€(4)€the€nature€andÐ Ð  Ðcharacteristics€of€the€criminal€conduct€involved;€(5)€evidence€and€information€offered€by€the€partiesÐ ¼  Ðon€enhancement€and€mitigating€factors;€(6)€any€statement€by€the€appellant€in€his€own€behalf;€and€(7)Ð ¨ø Ðthe€appellantððs€potential€for€rehabilitation€or€treatment.€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€40„35„102€and€„103Ð ”ä Ð(1997),€„210Ô#†X^ XXX^ æ2#ÔÔ‡X^ XXX^ Ô€(Supp.€2001);€òòsee€alsoóó€òòÔ#†X^ XXX^ 6#ÔÔ‡X^ XXX^ ÔState€v.€Ashbyóó,€823€S.W.2d€166,€Ô#†X^ XXX^ ƒ6#ÔÔ‡X^ XXX^ Ô168€(Tenn.€1991)Ô#†X^ XXX^ è6#Ô.Ð €Ð ÐÌà  àà ` àOn€appeal,€the€appellant€asks€this€court€to€determine:Ð X ¨ Ðà8  àà8` Ð Ð à(1)€whether€the€trial€court€committed€reversible€error€in€sentencing€byÐ D!” Ðdenying€the€appellantððs€request€for€probation€or€alternativeÐ 0"€  Ðsentencing;Ð#l!` x` x ÐÌà8  àà8` Ð Ð à(2)€whether€the€trial€court€committed€reversible€error€in€sentencing€byÐ ô$D # Ðenhancing€the€appellantððs€sentence€based€upon€the€presence€of€theÐ à%0!$ Ðfacts€and€elements€of€the€offenses€charged;€ÐÌ&"%` x` x ÐÌà8  àà8` Ð Ð à(3)€whether€the€trial€court€committed€reversible€error€in€sentencing€byÐ ¤(ô#' Ðdenying€probation€for€deterrence€purposes;€and€Ð)à$(` x` x Ðâ âÐ |*Ì%) Ðà8  àà8` Ð Ð à(4)€whether€the€trial€court€committed€reversible€error€in€sentencing€byÐ ° Ðâ ânot€properly€balancing€all€mitigation€factors€by€failing€to€observe€thatÐ œì Ðany€applicable€enhancement€factor€was€offset€by€mitigation€factors.ЈØ` x` x ÐÌà  àà ` àThe€appellantððs€first€and€third€issues€center€around€concerns€that€the€trial€court€erredÐ `° Ðwhen€it€failed€to€grant€full€probation€on€all€counts.€€Specifically,€the€appellant€contends€that€the€trialÐ L œ Ðcourt€erred€in€denying€alternative€sentencing.€€Respectfully,€we€note€that€the€trial€court€granted€theÐ 8 ˆ Ðappellant€an€alternative€sentence€when€it€granted€the€appellant€probation€on€fourteen€of€the€sixteenÐ $ t Ðcounts.òòóóÐ  ` ÐÌà  àà ` àÔ‡X^ XXX^ ÔInitially,€we€recognize€that€an€appellant€is€eligible€for€probation€if€the€sentenceÐ è 8  Ðactually€imposed€is€eight€years€or€less.€€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€40„35„303(a)€(1997).€€Moreover,€anÐ Ô$  Ðappellant€who€is€an€especially€mitigated€or€standard€offender€convicted€of€a€Class€C,€D,€or€E€felonyÐ À  Ðis€presumed€to€be€a€favorable€candidate€for€alternative€sentencing.€€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€40„35„102(6).€Ð ¬ü  ÐIn€the€instant€case,€the€appellant€is€a€standard€Range€I€offender€convicted€of€Class€D€felonies;Ð ˜è  Ðtherefore,€he€is€presumed€to€be€a€favorable€candidate€for€alternative€sentencing.€€òòóóÔ#†X^ XXX^ 5>#ÔÔ‡X^ XXX^ ÔHowever,€Ô#†X^ XXX^ A#ÔÔ‡X^ XXX^ ÔthisÐ „Ô  Ðpresumption€may€be€rebutted€by€ð ðevidence€to€the€contrary.ðð€€òòState€v.€Zeoliaóó,€928€S.W.2d€457,€461Ð pÀ Ð(Tenn.€Crim.€App.€1996).€€Ô#†X^ XXX^ dA#ÔÔ‡X^ XXX^ ÔThe€following€sentencing€considerations,€set€forth€in€Tennessee€CodeÐ \¬ ÐAnnotated€section€40„35„103(1),€may€constitute€ð ðevidence€to€the€contraryðð:Ð H˜ Ðà8  àà8` Ð Ð à(A)€Confinement€is€necessary€to€protect€society€by€restraining€aÐ 4„ Ðdefendant€who€has€a€long€history€of€criminal€conduct;Ð p` x` x ÐÌà8  àà8` Ð Ð à(B)€Confinement€is€necessary€to€avoid€depreciating€the€seriousness€ofÐ øH Ðthe€offense€or€confinement€is€particularly€suited€to€provide€anÐ ä4 Ðeffective€deterrence€to€others€likely€to€commit€similar€offenses;€orÐÐ ` x` x ÐÌà8  àà8` Ð Ð à(C)€Measures€less€restrictive€than€confinement€have€frequently€orÐ ¨ø Ðrecently€been€applied€unsuccessfully€to€the€defendant.€Ð”ä` x` x ÐòòÔ#†X^ XXX^ ZB#ÔÔ‡X^ XXX^ ÔZeoliaóó,€928€S.W.2d€at€461Ô#†X^ XXX^ %F#ÔòòóóÔ‡X^ XXX^ Ô.Ô#†X^ XXX^ ‰F#ÔÐ €Ð ÐÌà  àà ` àð ðThe€determination€of€whether€the€appellant€is€entitled€to€an€alternative€sentence€andÐ X ¨ Ðwhether€the€appellant€is€entitled€to€full€probation€are€different€inquiries.ðð€òòState€v.€Boggsóó,€932€S.W.2dÐ D!” Ð467,€477€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.€1996).Ô‡X^ XXX^ Ô€€Ô#†X^ XXX^ H#ÔÔ‡X^ XXX^ ÔAn€appellant€seeking€full€probation€bears€the€burden€ofÐ 0"€  Ðestablishing€his€suitability€for€full€probation,€regardless€of€whether€he€is€entitled€to€the€statutoryÐ #l! Ðpresumption€favoring€alternative€sentencing.€òòÔ#†X^ XXX^ SH#ÔÔ‡X^ XXX^ ÔId.óóÔ#†X^ XXX^ ŒI#ÔÔ‡X^ XXX^ Ô;€òòÔ#†X^ XXX^ ÔI#ÔÔ‡X^ XXX^ Ôsee€alsoóóÔ#†X^ XXX^ J#ÔÔ‡X^ XXX^ Ô€Ô#†X^ XXX^ hJ#ÔTenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€40„35„303(b).€€Ô‡X^ XXX^ ÔToÐ $X" Ðprove€his€suitability,€the€appellant€must€establish€that€granting€full€probation€will€ð ðððsubserve€the€endsÐ ô$D # Ðof€justice€and€the€best€interest€of€both€the€public€and€the€[appellant].ðððð€€òòState€v.€Dykesóó,€803€S.W.2dÐ à%0!$ Ð250,€259€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.€1990),€òòÔ#†X^ XXX^ ÏJ#ÔÔ‡X^ XXX^ Ôoverruled€on€other€grounds€byóó€òòState€v.€Hooperóó,€29€S.W.3d€1,€8Ð Ì&"% Ð(Tenn.€2000)Ô#†X^ XXX^ XL#ÔÔ‡X^ XXX^ Ô.Ô#†X^ XXX^ M#Ô€€Moreover,€Ð ¸'#& Ðà8  àà8` Ð Ð à[i]n€determining€oneððs€suitability€for€full€probation,€the€court€mayÐ ¤(ô#' Ðconsider€the€circumstances€of€the€offense,€the€defendantððs€potentialÐ )à$( Ðor€lack€of€potential€for€rehabilitation,€whether€full€probation€willÐ |*Ì%) Ðunduly€depreciate€the€seriousness€of€the€offense,€and€whether€aÐ h+¸&* Ðsentence€other€than€full€probation€would€provide€an€effectiveÐ ° Ðdeterrent€to€others€likely€to€commit€similar€crimes.Мì` x` x ÐòòBoggsóó,€932€S.W.2d€at€477.€€While€recognizing€the€appellantððs€lack€of€criminal€history,€the€trial€courtÐ ˆØ Ðnonetheless€determined€that€the€seriousness€of€the€offense€and€the€deterrent€effects€of€incarcerationÐ tÄ Ðwarranted€a€denial€of€full€probation.€Ð `° ÐÌà  àà ` àIn€òòState€v.€Hooperóó,€29€S.W.3d€1€(Tenn.€2000),€our€supreme€court€specifically€notedÐ 8 ˆ Ðfive€factors€for€consideration€when€denying€probation€solely€upon€the€basis€of€deterrence:Ð $ t Ðà8  àà8` Ð Ð à1)€Whether€other€incidents€of€the€charged€offense€are€increasinglyÐ  ` Ðpresent€in€the€community,€jurisdiction,€or€in€the€state€as€a€whole.Ðü L ` x` x Ðà8  àà8` Ð Ð à.€.€.€.Ðè 8 ` x` x Ðà8  àà8` Ð Ð à2)€Whether€the€defendantððs€crime€was€the€result€of€intentional,Ð Ô$  Ðknowing,€or€reckless€conduct€or€was€otherwise€motivated€by€a€desireÐ À  Ðto€profit€or€gain€from€the€criminal€behavior.Ьü ` x` x Ðà8  àà8` Ð Ð à.€.€.€.Иè ` x` x Ðà8  àà8` Ð Ð à3)€Whether€the€defendantððs€crime€and€conviction€have€receivedÐ „Ô  Ðsubstantial€publicity€beyond€that€normally€expected€in€the€typicalÐ pÀ Ðcase.Ð\¬` x` x Ðà8  àà8` Ð Ð à.€.€.€.ÐH˜` x` x Ðà8  àà8` Ð Ð à4)€Whether€the€defendant€was€a€member€of€a€criminal€enterprise,€orÐ 4„ Ðsubstantially€encouraged€or€assisted€others€in€achieving€the€criminalÐ  p Ðobjective.Ð \` x` x Ðà8  àà8` Ð Ð à.€.€.€.ÐøH` x` x Ðà8  àà8` Ð Ð à5)€Whether€the€defendant€has€previously€engaged€in€criminal€conductÐ ä4 Ðof€the€same€type€as€the€offense€in€question,€irrespective€of€whetherÐ Ð  Ðsuch€conduct€resulted€in€previous€arrests€or€convictions.м ` x` x ÐòòId.óó€at€10„12.€€A€trial€court€is€not€limited€to€these€five€considerations€ð ðprovided€that€(1)€the€sentencingÐ ¨ø Ðcourt€states€[any]€additional€factors€on€the€record€with€specificity,€and€(2)€the€presence€of€theseÐ ”ä Ðadditional€factors€is€supported€by€at€least€some€proof.ðð€€òòId.óó€at€12.€€Ð €Ð ÐÌà  àà ` àIn€the€instant€case,€based€upon€the€cases€heard€daily€by€the€court,€the€trial€court€notedÐ X ¨ Ðthat€there€was€a€drug€problem€in€the€community.€€This€general€comment€alone€is€not€sufficient€toÐ D!” Ðdeny€probation€based€solely€upon€deterrence.€€òòSeeóó€òòState€v.€Fieldsóó,€40€S.W.3d€435,€442€(Tenn.€2001).€Ð 0"€  ÐHowever,€the€trial€court€also€noted€that€the€appellant€was€a€member€of€a€criminal€enterprise€in€whichÐ #l! Ðhis€wife,€a€co„defendant,€was€also€involved.€€òòSeeóó€òòState€v.€Timothy€C.€Jewell,€Jr.óó,€No.€W2000„00998„Ð $X" ÐCCA„R3„CD,€2001€Tenn.€Crim.€App.€LEXIS€371,€at€*12€(Jackson,€May€15,€2001).€€Additionally,Ð ô$D # Ðwe€observe€that€the€charged€criminal€conduct€occurred€over€a€period€of€at€least€three€years€andÐ à%0!$ Ðinvolved€a€voluminous€number€of€pills,€specifically€90,000€pills€to€one€individual,€which€facts€alsoÐ Ì&"% Ðdemonstrate€a€criminal€enterprise.€€òòSeeóó€òòState€v.€Glenda€Eva€Tilleyóó,€No.€E2001„00264„CCA„R3„CD,Ð ¸'#& Ð2001€Tenn.€Crim.€App.€LEXIS€601,€at€*12€(Knoxville,€Aug.€9,€2001).€€Furthermore,€the€numerousÐ ¤(ô#' Ðsupportive€letters€from€members€of€the€community€demonstrate€that€the€appellantððs€case€was€well„Ð )à$( Ðknown€in€the€community,€suggesting€that€the€case€received€substantial€publicity.€€Notably,€severalÐ |*Ì%) Ðof€the€letters€indicate€that€the€appellantððs€case€was€publicized€in€local€newspapers;€specifically,€oneÐ h+¸&* Ðof€the€letters€mentioned€that€the€appellantððs€case€ð ðma[de]€the€front€page€news.ððòòóó€Accordingly,€the€trialÐ ° Ðcourt€did€not€err€in€considering€the€deterrent€effect€of€confinement€in€denying€the€appellant€fullÐ œì Ðprobation.€Ð ˆØ ÐÌà  àà ` àRegardless,€even€if€the€trial€court€erred€in€applying€the€deterrence€factor,€itÐ `° Ðnevertheless€correctly€denied€total€probation€to€avoid€depreciating€the€seriousness€of€the€offense.Ô‡X^ XXX^ ԀРL œ ÐThis€court€has€previously€concluded€that€the€nature€and€circumstances€underlying€the€criminalÐ 8 ˆ ÐconductÔ#†X^ XXX^ |a#Ô€may€alone€give€rise€to€the€denial€of€probation.€€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€40„35„210(b)(4).€òòSeeóóÐ $ t ÐÔ‡X^ XXX^ ÔòòState€v.€Fletcheróó,€805€S.W.2d€785,€789€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.€1991)Ô#†X^ XXX^ Ãb#ÔÔ‡X^ XXX^ Ô.€€Ô#†X^ XXX^ Ic#ÔÔ‡X^ XXX^ ÔWhen€imposing€confinementÐ  ` Ðbased€upon€the€seriousness€of€the€offense,€the€trial€court€must€first€determine€if€ð ðððthe€circumstancesÐ ü L  Ðof€the€offense€as€committed€[are]€especially€violent,€horrifying,€shocking,€reprehensible,€offensive,Ð è 8  Ðor€otherwise€of€an€excessive€or€exaggerated€degree.ðððð€òòÔ#†X^ XXX^ Žc#ÔÔ‡X^ XXX^ Ôóó€òòZeoliaóó,€928€S.W.2d€at€462€(quoting€(òòState€v.Ð Ô$  ÐBinghamóó,€910€S.W.2d€448,€454€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.€1995)).€€Ð À  ÐÌà  àà ` àThe€appellant€pled€guilty€to€a€violation€of€Tennessee€Code€Annotated€section€53„11„Ð ˜è  Ð401(a)(1)€(1997),€which€statute€provides€that€it€is€unlawful€for€a€pharmacistÐ „Ô  Ðà8  àà8` Ð Ð àto€distribute€or€dispense€a€controlled€substance€in€violation€of€ðð€53„Ð pÀ Ð11„308€or€to€distribute€or€dispense€any€controlled€substance€for€anyÐ \¬ Ðpurpose€other€than€those€authorized€by€and€consistent€with€suchÐ H˜ Ðpersonððs€professional€or€occupational€licensure€or€registration€law,€orÐ 4„ Ðto€distribute€or€dispense€any€controlled€substance€in€a€mannerÐ  p Ðprohibited€by€such€personððs€professional€or€occupational€licensure€orÐ  \ Ðregistration€law.ÐøH` x` x ÐÔ#†X^ XXX^ 8e#ÔTennessee€Code€Annotated€section€53„11„308(c)€(1997)€prohibits€the€dispensation€of€Schedule€IIIÐ ä4 Ðor€Schedule€IV€drugs€by€a€pharmacist€without€a€valid€prescription.€€Thus,€the€appellant€would€haveÐ Ð  Ðbeen€guilty€of€an€offense€had€he€falsified€only€one€prescription€for€each€of€the€sixteen€people€namedÐ ¼  Ðin€the€information.€€However,€ð ð[i]n€considering€the€circumstances€of€the€offense[s],€the€court€mayÐ ¨ø Ðgo€beyond€the€negotiated€plea€and€consider€the€ððtrue€natureðð€of€the€crime[s].ðð€€òòState€v.€Biggsóó,€769Ð ”ä ÐS.W.2d€506,€507€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.€1988)€(citing€òòState€v.€Hollingsworthóó,€647€S.W.2d€937,€939Ð €Ð Ð(Tenn.€1983)).€€In€the€instant€case,€the€trial€court€noted:Ð l¼ Ðà8  àà8` Ð Ð àBut€significant€to€the€Courtððs€decision€here€today,€that€the€total€ofÐ X ¨ Ðthose€figures€alone€was€approximately€a€hundred€and€forty€thousandÐ D!” Ð(140,000)€pills€in€the€sixteen€(16)€various€and€independent€chargesÐ 0"€  Ðthat€were€involved.€€So€this€appears€to€be€extraordinary.€.€.€.€Now,Ð #l! Ðwhat€happened€when€these€hundred€and€forty€thousand€(140,000)Ð $X" Ðpills€were€released€into€the€community€to€individuals,€whether€theyÐ ô$D # Ðbe€suffering€from€pain,€as€explained€by€[the€appellant]€in€hisÐ à%0!$ Ðstatement€to€the€Probation€Officer,€you€do€have€a€hundred€and€fortyÐ Ì&"% Ð[thousand€(140,000)]€pills€going€out€of€control€into€the€communityÐ ¸'#& Ðwithout€the€supervision€of€the€Tennessee€Department€of€Health€or€theÐ ¤(ô#' Ð.€.€.€Board€of€Pharmacy.€€So€that€does€create€a€substantial€danger€toÐ )à$( Ðthe€community€because€we€donððt€know€what€these€people€ð!ð€theyÐ |*Ì%) Ðmight€have€taken€them,€which€could€have€been€a€detriment€to€them,Ð h+¸&* Ðthey€may€have,€in€order€to€obtain€income,€sold€them€to€other€people,Ð ° Ðcould€have,€you€know,€the€potentialities€are€endless€of€where€theseÐ œì Ðpills€could€have€gone€because€they€clearly€went€out€of€control€of€theÐ ˆØ Ðdrugstore€and€the€licensed€pharmacist€when€they€got€out.€€So€theÐ tÄ Ðnature€of€this€offense€appears€to€be€in€the€extreme.Ð`°` x` x ÐIn€sum,€over€the€course€of€three€years,€the€appellant€dispensed€an€extraordinary€amount€of€pillsÐ L œ Ðthrough€a€large€number€of€falsified€prescriptions.€€òòSeeóó€òòState€v.€James€Randolph€Bradfordóó,€No.Ð 8 ˆ Ð01C01„9004„CC„00101,€1991€Tenn.€Crim.€App.€LEXIS€296,€at€**5„6€(Nashville,€Apr.€18,€1991).Ð $ t ÐThe€trial€court€found€that€the€appellant€was€remorseful€and€that€he€had€enrolled€in€a€rehabilitationÐ  ` Ðprogram€to€fight€his€substance€addiction;€however,€the€court€nevertheless€found€that€the€appellantÐ ü L  Ðhad€a€ð ðsustained€intent€to€violate€the€law.ðð€€This€finding€is€supported€by€the€appellantððs€distributionÐ è 8  Ðof€140,000€pills€to€sixteen€individuals€over€a€three€year€period.€€Again,€we€note€that€the€trial€courtÐ Ô$  Ðgave€careful€consideration€to€the€appellantððs€sentencing.€€We€agree€with€the€trial€court€that€theÐ À  Ðcircumstances€underlying€the€appellantððs€convictions€were€of€an€excessive€or€exaggerated€degree.€Ð ¬ü  ÐòòSeeóó€òòState€v.€Charles€Chesteenóó,€No.€E1999„00910„CCA„R3„CD,€2000€Tenn.€Crim.€App.€LEXIS€455,Ð ˜è  Ðat€**31„32€(Knoxville,€June€8,€2000).€€Accordingly,€we€conclude€that€the€trial€court€did€not€err€inÐ „Ô  Ðdenying€the€appellant€full€probation.Ð pÀ ÐÌà  àà ` àThe€appellant€also€contends€that€the€trial€court€erred€in€enhancing€the€appellantððsÐ H˜ Ðsentence€ð ðbased€upon€the€presence€of€the€facts€and€elements€of€the€offenses€charged.ðð€€The€appellantÐ 4„ Ðand€the€State€entered€into€a€plea€agreement€which€was€approved€by€the€trial€court.€€The€agreementÐ  p Ðspecifically€provided€the€sentence€the€appellant€was€to€receive€for€each€conviction.€€Thus,€the€recordÐ  \ Ðdoes€not€reflect€that€the€trial€court€€ð ðenhancedðð€any€sentence€based€upon€facts€which€were€elementsÐ øH Ðof€the€charged€offenses.€€Ð ä4 ÐÌà  àà ` àFinally,€the€appellant€alleges€that€the€trial€court€improperly€balanced€the€enhancementÐ ¼  Ðand€mitigating€factors.€€However,€Ð ¨ø Ðà8  àà8` Ð Ð àÔ‡X^ XXX^ Ô[t]he€appellant's€sentence€is€not€determined€by€the€mathematicalÐ ”ä Ðprocess€of€adding€the€sum€total€of€enhancing€factors€present€thenÐ €Ð Ðsubtracting€from€this€figure€the€mitigating€factors€present€for€a€netÐ l¼ Ðnumber€of€years.€Rather,€the€weight€to€be€afforded€an€existing€factorÐ X ¨ Ðis€left€to€the€trial€court's€discretion€so€long€as€the€court€complies€withÐ D!” Ðthe€purposes€and€principles€of€the€1989€Sentencing€Ô% ‡ ÔÔ#†X^ XXX^ Ã{#ÔÔ%†Ó}ÔÔ‡X^ XXX^ ÔAct€and€itsÐ 0"€  Ðfindings€are€adequately€supported€by€the€record.Ô#†X^ XXX^ ~#Ô€€Ð#l!` x` x ÐòòBoggsóó,€932€S.W.2d€at€475„€476.€€We€conclude€that€the€trial€court€did€not€err€in€its€application€of€theÐ $X" Ðenhancement€or€mitigating€factors.€€Ð ô$D # ÐÌà@MM"ìàòòò òIII.€€ConclusionóóˆÐ Ì&"% Ðó óà0  àà0` (#(#àBased€upon€the€foregoing,€we€affirm€the€judgment€of€the€trial€court.€€à Ð àà @Ð àи'#&` (#` (# ÐÌÌÌà  àà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  à___________________________________€Ð h+¸&* Ðà  àà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  àNORMA€McGEE€OGLE,€JUDGE