ÿWPCþ Ái³{Ô™©%AvÝ<”ºþ$]ú¼Óa&ßÉ0jæ™Ì®™"À7Ð…Iˆ+ðÅüK:îæ)¨Ycsº+Ð5Z ®$­!Ã_è¹s¢YˆL{3yJÈ=-Cñ~dp”=¸™:Ô9*; JÝ«‚4á]ò‹µ¼™õ›3 FýX -±â£iÞëLB0Þ”t„o“Pv«{*t¹(W%þ×kæ9ZòÖܶ2˜g¬ö®ŠÂ.µ “;ûÞû¡C—Œ®žªj_KPª òÑ‚hzy„¨ø­ÛVu‰ä&Y7ç)©³Iš—ì lmÍ .œ\vf"ùñðye(à\¼§ÐÆ£iŽu„ªoÎä~¸ïk~ 359¯ÊAwo´£:ú–2Wo?#´.aÊ.Òr˜“  °trj’W1ŠðNë­*ʼnO5½›“ t\šˆ£:H=§õµæ~sÆrGþÊØe!§Šã§h™¹\€ÞÕL£vâûtØ%O¶á†Ã HFIx•Ûõµ$²Ë.âüAQŸ‰=vŒ¥>äÕ™ `þ2zü_/¾Õª¨›é¬\Î 5Á¨('{$ˆh&Í‹æ $ÛêbPUÿr^ÁBgutÙÓ}YÑ™`ùiwy“€’Kb %\^ b 0ˆnUNöwD4H\ zkÒå· m¹ #ÁÐ ‘ Æ™ Æ_ Æ% Æë U>±NïïïEññññññññññññññññññññññññbóóóóóóóóóóóóóóóóóóóóóóóóóóóóóóóóóóóó 0ëûûûû Bææ 0¤ D3§ D-Ú 0K ASRÆ¥ 0¤k 0D A«S»¬r*+ (`£ª$¡¡Ñ€.ÑÑ8€½­»»d»»d8ÑÑ ý ÑÓ  Ó(í€"  Z6Times New Roman RegularÖJ~'GRA~13|x ˜C:\PROGRA~1\COREL\WORDPE~1\TEMPLATE\CUSTOM~1\REVISE~1.WPTC:\Program Files\Corel\WordPerfect Office 2000\Template\Custom WP Templates\revised standard opinion.wptÿU‹ÿÀÀÀ˜HP LaserJet 4050 Series PCL 5eÈÈ,,,,ÈÈ0 Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5‚Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5„Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5…Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5ô\  `‹&Times New Roman- ù-(|G2* $¤¤Ý ƒ£ª!ÝÑ€.ÑÑ8€ U»»dd8ÑÑ ý ÑÓ  ÓÝ  Ýà  àòòÚ  Ú0Ú  ÚóóÔ€ô¡½ò»»Ô d(|3ÿf$££Ý ƒ£ª!ÝÑ€.ÑÑ8€ U»»dd8ÑÑ ý ÑÓ  ÓÝ  ÝVVVV'ÿÿdxd)!ÈÈÈÈdxdx( ±þ$’’ò òFigure€Ú  Ú1Ú  Úó ó^_X`YEþÿ<<CÿÿƒLevel 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5(|3ÿf$¢¢Ý ƒ£ª!ÝÑ€.ÑÑ8€ U»»dd8ÑÑ ý ÑÓ  ÓÝ  Ý($$””ò òÚ  Ú1Ú  Úó óX[Z&OLE 2.0 Box <=8ÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿCÿÿ HKKKKÝ ƒ£ª!ÝÑ€.ÑÑ8€ U»»ddÈ8ÑÑ ý ÑÓ  ÓÝ  ÝÔ_ÔÑ  ÑÑ  ÑÔ€¼ U»»»ÔÑ8€AIXXdì»»d8Ñà@ttìàÔ‡îD UÔIN€THE€COURT€OF€CRIMINAL€APPEALS€OF€TENNESSEEˆÐ ° Ðà@kk$ìàAT€NASHVILLEÔ#†¼ U»îîD #ԈРÖ& ÐÓ  Óà @ àà @` àAssigned€on€Briefs€July€18,€2001Ð üL ÐÔ‡XAIX»¼ UÔÌò òÔ#†¼ U»XXAI#ÔSTATE€OF€TENNESSEEòòóó€v.€FELICIA€L.€Ô_ÔBRITTONÔ_ÔòòóóÔ‡XAIX»¼ UÔó óÐ úJ ÐÌà@@½½ìàò òDirect€Appeal€from€the€Circuit€Court€for€Montgomery€CountyÐ ú J Ðà@@øøìàNo.€40806,€40000400€€€€€€John€H.€Ô_ÔGasawayÔ_Ô,€III,€Judge€Ð æ 6 ÐÌÌà@@ìì*ìàßA€V) °°` d€÷E<©` AßÐ ªú  ÐÌà@@TTìàNo.€M2001„00176„CCA„R3„CD€„€Filed€September€7,€Ô_Ô2001Ô_ÔÐ ¥õ  ÐÌßA€V) °°` dE<|` AßÐ }Í  Ðó óÌÓ  ÓAfter€pleading€guilty€to€felony€theft€of€identity,€a€Class€D€felony,€and€to€violating€her€probation,€theÐ xÈ  Ðtrial€court€ordered€the€defendant€to€serve€one€year€confinement€and€one€year€probation€withÐ d´ Ðrehabilitation€as€a€result€of€violating€her€probation.€€In€addition,€the€trial€court€ordered€her€to€serveÐ P  Ðan€additional€three€years€of€probation€for€the€felony€theft€of€identity€conviction,€to€run€consecutiveÐ <Œ Ðto€the€sentence€resulting€from€the€probation€violation.€€The€defendant€appeals€and€asserts€that€theÐ (x Ðtrial€court€erred€in€sentencing€her€on€the€probation€violation,€erred€in€sentencing€her€to€three€yearsÐ d Ðof€probation€for€the€felony€theft€of€identity,€and€erred€in€ordering€the€two€sentences€to€be€servedÐ P Ðconsecutively.€€€After€review,€Ô‡XAIXXXAIÔwe€affirm€the€judgment€of€the€trial€court.Ô#†XAIXXXAIŒ#ÔÔ#†¼ U»XXAI¸#ÔÔ‡XAIX»¼ UÔÐ ì< ÐÓÓÌò òTenn.€R.€App.€P.€3€Appeal€as€of€Right;€Judgment€of€the€Circuit€Court€Affirmedó óÐ Ä ÐÌòòÓ  ÓÔ#†¼ U»àXAI #ÔÔ‡XAIX.¼ UÔJohn€Everett€Williams,€J.óó,€delivered€the€opinion€of€the€court,€in€which€òòGary€R.€Wade,€Ô_ÔP.J.Ô_Ô,óó€andÐ œì ÐòòJoseph€M.€Ô_ÔTiptonÔ_Ô,€J.€óó,€joined.Ð ˆØ ÐÌEdward€Ô_ÔDeWerffÔ_Ô€and€Ô_ÔLonnaÔ_Ô€K.€Ô_ÔHildrethÔ_Ô,€Clarksville,€Tennessee,€for€the€appellant,€Felicia€Ô_ÔLasheaÔ_ÔÐ `° ÐÔ_ÔBrittonÔ_Ô.Ð L œ ÐÌPaul€G.€Summers,€Attorney€General€and€Reporter;€Ô_ÔAngeleÔ_Ô€M.€Gregory,€Assistant€Attorney€General;Ð $"t! ÐJohn€Wesley€Ô_ÔCarneyÔ_Ô,€Jr.,€District€Attorney€General;€and€Lance€A.€Baker,€Assistant€District€AttorneyÐ #`" ÐGeneral,€for€the€appellee,€State€of€Tennessee.Ð ü#L# ÐÌÓÌ ÓÌà@@OO&ìàò òOPINIONó óÔ#†¼ U»XXAIû #ÔÔ‡XAIX»¼ UÔÐ À&"& ÐÌòòóóÔ#†¼ U»XXAI#ÔÓ  ÓÔ€XAIX»¼ UÔÓ XÓIn€August€of€1999,€the€defendant,€Felicia€Ô_ÔLasheaÔ_Ô€Ô_ÔBrittonÔ_Ô,€pled€guilty€to€two€counts€of€forgeryÐ ˜(è#( Ðand€one€count€of€fraudulent€use€of€a€credit€card,€both€Class€E€felonies.€€The€trial€court€sentenced€herÐ „)Ô$) Ðto€two€years€probation€for€each€offense,€to€be€served€concurrently.Ð p*À%* ÐÐ \+¬&+ ÐOn€May€17,€2000,€the€defendantððs€probation€officer€filed€a€probation€violation€affidavit€andÐ H,˜', Ðwarrant€against€the€defendant.€€The€grounds€alleged€for€the€violation€were€an€arrest€for€domesticÐ 4-„(-ý ÐÔ_Ôassault,€an€arrest€for€theft,€and€failure€to€provide€proof€of€court€costs€payments.€€The€defendant€wasÐ ° Ðlater€indicted€on€July€5,€2000,€for€felony€theft€of€identity,€a€Class€D€felony.Ð œì ÐÐ ˆØ ÐOn€November€9,€2000,€the€defendant€entered€a€guilty€plea€to€felony€theft€of€identity,€whileÐ tÄ Ðalso€waiving€a€probation€revocation€hearing€and€pleading€guilty€to€violation€of€probation.€€The€trialÐ `° Ðcourt€then€set€a€hearing€in€order€to€sentence€the€defendant€on€the€theft€of€identity€conviction€and€theÐ L œ Ðprobation€revocation.Ð 8 ˆ ÐÐ $ t ÐAt€the€December€12,€2000€sentencing€hearing,€the€trial€court€sentenced€the€defendant€to€oneÐ  ` Ðyear€confinement€and€the€remaining€year€on€probation€for€the€probation€violation.€€As€a€conditionÐ ü L  Ðof€this€remaining€year€on€probation,€the€court€ordered€the€defendant€to€attend€a€rehabilitationÐ è 8  Ðprogram,€the€Synergy€Program,€in€Memphis,€Tennessee.€€The€trial€court€then€sentenced€the€defendantÐ Ô$  Ðto€three€years€for€the€felony€theft€of€identity,€to€be€served€on€probation,€consecutive€to€the€two„yearÐ À  Ðsentence€resulting€from€the€probation€violation.Ð ¬ü  ÐÐ ˜è  ÐThe€defendant€now€appeals€her€sentence,€asserting:€(1)€That€the€trial€court€erred€in€orderingÐ „Ô  Ðher€to€serve€one€year€of€confinement€and€the€remaining€year€on€probation,€in€a€rehabilitationÐ pÀ Ðprogram,€for€violating€her€probation;€(2)€that€the€trial€court€erred€in€sentencing€her€to€three€years€forÐ \¬ Ðthe€felony€theft€of€identity€conviction;€and€(3)€that€the€trial€court€erred€in€ordering€the€two€sentencesÐ H˜ Ðto€be€served€consecutively.Ð 4„ ÐÐ  p ÐÓ  ÓÓ XÓòòò òSentencing€HearingÐ  \ ÐÌÓ  ÓÓ XÓó óóóAt€the€sentencing€hearing€on€December€12,€2000,€the€victim€of€the€felony€theft€of€identityÐ ä4 Ðtestified.€€Essentially,€she€testified€that€the€defendant,€by€illegally€using€the€victimððs€identity€to€makeÐ Ð  Ðcredit€card€purchases,€ruined€her€credit€and€has€caused€her€significant€financial€problems,€includingÐ ¼  Ðover€$5000€in€debt.€€She€also€expressed€her€desire€for€the€defendant€to€be€incarcerated.Ð ¨ø ÐÐ ”ä ÐNext,€the€defendant€testified€on€her€own€behalf.€€She€testified€that€she€obtained€and€usedÐ €Ð Ðcredit€cards€in€the€victimððs€name€to€purchase€electronics,€which€she€then€sold€on€the€street€in€orderÐ l¼ Ðto€purchase€drugs.€€She€then€testified€that€she€has€not€used€drugs€since€completing€a€28€day€rehabÐ X ¨ Ðprogram€at€The€Elam€Mental€Health€Center€in€Nashville€in€April€of€2000.€€The€defendant€admittedÐ D!” Ðthat€she€violated€her€probation.€€However,€she€stated€that€she€was€not€a€bad€person,€but€did€have€aÐ 0"€  Ðbad€habit,€and€should€be€given€a€second€chance.Ð #l! ÐÐ $X" ÐAt€the€conclusion€of€the€hearing,€the€trial€court€concluded€that€three€enhancement€factorsÐ ô$D # Ðapplied€to€the€felony€theft€of€identity€conviction:€(1)€The€defendant€had€a€previous€history€of€criminalÐ à%0!$ Ðconvictions€and€criminal€behavior,€including€assault,€forgery,€fraudulent€use€of€a€credit€card,€a€badÐ Ì&"% Ðcheck€charge,€and€admitted€drug€use;€(2)€the€defendant€had€an€unwillingness€to€comply€withÐ ¸'#& Ðconditions€of€a€sentence€involving€release€into€the€community;€and€(3)€the€instant€crime€wasÐ ¤(ô#' Ðcommitted€while€the€defendant€was€on€probation.€€The€trial€court€also€found€that€two€mitigatingÐ )à$( Ðfactors€applied:€(1)€the€defendantððs€conduct€did€not€result€in€or€threaten€serious€bodily€injury,€andÐ |*Ì%) Ð(2)€the€defendant€pled€guilty€negating€the€necessity€of€a€trial.€€In€weighing€these€factors,€the€courtÐ h+¸&* Ðconcluded€that€a€three„year€sentence€was€appropriate.€€In€addition,€the€trial€court€ordered€that€thisÐ ° Ðthree„year€sentence€be€served€on€probation,€consecutive€to€the€one€year€of€confinement€and€one€yearÐ œì Ðof€probation€while€at€the€Synergy€Program€in€Memphis,€which€resulted€from€the€probation€violation.€Ð ˆØ ÐThe€trial€court€ordered€the€sentence€for€the€felony€theft€of€identity€conviction€to€be€servedÐ tÄ Ðconsecutive€because€the€defendant€committed€the€instant€offense€while€on€probation.Ð `° ÐÐ L œ ÐòòÓ XÓÓ  Óò òAnalysisÐ 8 ˆ Ðó óóóÓµ#ÓÓ X§#ÓÐ $ t ÐÔ‡XAIXXXAIÔThis€courtððs€review€of€the€sentence€imposed€by€the€trial€court€is€de€novo€with€a€presumptionÐ  \ Ðof€correctness,€òòseeóó€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€40„35„401(d),€conditioned€upon€an€affirmative€showing€inÐ ø H  Ðthe€record€that€the€trial€judge€considered€the€sentencing€principles€and€all€relevant€facts€andÐ ä 4  Ðcircumstances,€òòseeóó€òòState€v.€Ashbyóó,€823€S.W.2d€166,€169€(Tenn.€1991).€€€If€the€trial€court€fails€toÐ Ð  Ðcomply€with€the€statutory€directives,€our€review€is€de€novo€with€no€presumption€of€correctness.€Ð ¼  ÐòòState€v.€Pooleóó,€945€S.W.2d€93,€96€(Tenn.€1997).€€Here,€the€trial€court€complied€with€the€statutoryÐ ¨ø  Ðdirectives;€therefore,€our€review€is€de€novo€with€a€presumption€of€correctness.€€In€this€case,€theÐ ”ä  Ðdefendant,€as€the€appealing€party,€must€show€that€the€sentence€is€improper.€€òòSeeóó€Tenn.€Code€Ann.Ð €Ð  Ððð€40„35„401(d),€Sentencing€Commission€Comments.Ð l¼ ÐÐ X¨ ÐUnder€the€Criminal€Sentencing€Reform€Act€of€1989,€trial€judges€are€encouraged€to€useÐ D” Ðalternatives€to€incarceration.€€An€especially€mitigated€or€standard€offender€convicted€of€a€Class€C,Ð 0€ ÐD€or€E€felony€is€presumed€to€be€a€favorable€candidate€for€alternative€sentencing€options€in€theÐ l Ðabsence€of€evidence€to€the€contrary.€€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€40„35„102(6).€Ô#†XAIXXXAI$#Ô€€Felony€theft€of€identity€isÐ X Ða€Class€D€felonyÔ‡XAIXXXAIÔ;€therefore,€this€defendant€is€presumed€favorable€for€an€alternative€sentence.€€ThisÐ ôD Ðpresumption€does€not€apply€to€the€legal€conclusions€reached€by€the€trial€court€in€sentencing€theÐ à0 Ðaccused€or€to€the€determinations€made€by€the€trial€court€which€are€predicated€upon€uncontrovertedÐ Ì Ðfacts.€òòState€v.€Butleróó,€900€S.W.2d€305,€311€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.€1994);€òòState€v.€Smithóó,€891€S.W.2dÐ ¸ Ð922,€929€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.),€òòperm.€app.€deniedóó,€(Tenn.€1994).€€However,€this€court€is€required€toÐ ¤ô Ðattribute€great€weight€to€the€trial€courtððs€determination€of€controverted€facts€as€the€trial€courtððsÐ à Ðdetermination€of€these€facts€is€predicated€upon€the€witnessesðð€demeanor€and€appearance€whenÐ |Ì Ðtestifying.€€A€defendant€is€eligible€for€probation€if€the€sentence€received€by€the€defendant€is€eightÐ h¸ Ðyears€or€less,€subject€to€some€statutory€exclusions.€€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€40„35„303(a).€€The€trial€courtÐ T ¤ Ðsentenced€the€defendant€to€a€three„year€term;€therefore,€she€is€eligible€for€probation.€€Ð @! ÐÐ ,"|  ÐA€court€should€consider€the€mitigating€and€enhancing€factors€set€forth€in€Tennessee€CodeÐ #h! ÐAnnotated€sections€40„35„113€and€„114€as€they€relate€to€the€section€40„35„103€considerations.€€òòStateÐ $T" Ðv.€Bostonóó,€938€S.W.2d€435,€438€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.€1996);€òòseeóó€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€40„35„210(b)(5).€Ð ð$@ # ÐAdditionally,€a€court€should€consider€the€defendantððs€potential€or€lack€of€potential€for€rehabilitationÐ Ü%,!$ Ðwhen€determining€if€an€alternative€sentence€would€be€appropriate.€€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€40„35„103(5);Ð È&"% ÐòòBostonóó,€938€S.W.2d€at€438.€€Ð ´'#& ÐÐ  (ð#' ÐThere€is€no€mathematical€equation€to€be€utilized€in€determining€sentencing€alternatives.€€NotÐ Œ)Ü$( Ðonly€should€the€sentence€fit€the€offense,€but€it€should€fit€the€offender€as€well.€€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ððÐ x*È%) Ð40„35„103(2);€òòState€v.€Boggsóó,€932€S.W.2d€467,€476„77€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.€1996).€€Indeed,Ð d+´&* Ðindividualized€punishment€is€the€essence€of€alternative€sentencing.€€òòState€v.€Dowdyóó,€894€S.W.2dÐ ° Ð301,€305€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.€1994).€€In€summary,€sentencing€must€be€determined€on€a€case„by„caseÐ œì Ðbasis,€tailoring€each€sentence€to€that€particular€defendant€based€upon€the€facts€of€that€case€and€theÐ ˆØ Ðcircumstances€of€that€defendant.€€òòState€v.€Mossóó,€727€S.W.2d€229,€235€(Tenn.€1986).Ð tÄ ÐÐ `° ÐIt€is€further€presumed€that€a€sentence€other€than€incarceration€would€result€in€successfulÐ L œ Ðrehabilitation€unless€rebutted€by€sufficient€evidence€in€the€record.€€òòByrdóó,€861€S.W.2d€at€380.Ð 8 ˆ ÐAlthough€probation€must€be€considered,€ð ðthe€defendant€is€not€automatically€entitled€to€probation€asÐ $ t Ða€matter€of€law.ðð€€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€40„35„303(b),€Sentencing€Commission€Comments;€òòState€v.Ð  ` ÐHartleyóó,€818€S.W.2d€370,€373€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.€1991).€€Because€the€defendant€here€is€seekingÐ ü L  Ðprobation,€she€bears€the€burden€on€appeal€of€showing€the€sentence€imposed€is€improper,€and€thatÐ è 8  Ðprobation€will€be€in€the€best€interest€of€him€and€the€public.€€òòState€v.€Bakeróó,€966€S.W.2d€429,€434Ð Ô$  Ð(Tenn.€Crim.€App.€1997).€Ð À  ÐÐ ¬ü  ÐIn€determining€whether€to€grant€or€deny€probation,€a€trial€court€should€consider€theÐ ˜è  Ðcircumstances€of€the€offense,€the€defendantððs€criminal€record,€the€defendantððs€social€history€andÐ „Ô  Ðpresent€condition,€the€need€for€deterrence,€and€the€best€interest€of€both€the€defendant€and€the€public.€Ð pÀ ÐòòState€v.€Grearóó,€568€S.W.2d€285,€286€(Tenn.€1978);€òòState€v.€Boydóó,€925€S.W.2d€237,€244€(Tenn.€Crim.Ð \¬ ÐApp.€1995).€€The€defendantððs€lack€of€credibility€is€also€an€appropriate€consideration€and€reflects€onÐ H˜ Ða€defendantððs€potential€for€rehabilitation.€€òòState€v.€Dowdyóó,€894€S.W.2d€301,€306€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.Ð 4„ Ð1994).€Ð  p ÐÐ  \ ÐProbation€may€be€denied€based€solely€on€the€circumstances€surrounding€the€offense.€€òòStateÐ øH Ðv.€Hartleyóó,€818€S.W.2d€370,€374€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.€1991).€€However,€the€circumstances€of€theÐ ä4 Ðoffense€as€committed€must€be€especially€violent,€horrifying,€shocking,€reprehensible,€offensive,€orÐ Ð  Ðotherwise€of€an€excessive€or€exaggerated€degree;€and€the€nature€of€the€offense€must€outweigh€allÐ ¼  Ðfactors€favoring€probation.€€òòHartleyóó,€818€S.W.2d€at€374„75.Ð ¨ø ÐÐ ”ä ÐIn€determining€if€incarceration€is€appropriate,€a€trial€court€considers€(1)€the€need€to€protectÐ €Ð Ðsociety€by€restraining€a€defendant€having€a€long€history€of€criminal€conduct;€(2)€the€need€to€avoidÐ l¼ Ðdepreciating€the€seriousness€of€the€offense;€(3)€whether€confinement€is€particularly€appropriate€toÐ X ¨ Ðeffectively€deter€others€likely€to€commit€similar€offenses;€and€(4)€whether€less€restrictive€measuresÐ D!” Ðhave€often€or€recently€been€unsuccessfully€applied€to€the€defendant.€€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€40„35„Ð 0"€  Ð103(1);€òòsee€alsoóó€òòAshbyóó,€823€S.W.2d€at€169;€òòState€v.€Grigsbyóó,€957€S.W.2d€541,€545€(Tenn.€Crim.Ð #l! ÐApp.€1997);€òòState€v.€Millsapsóó,€920€S.W.2d€267,€270€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.€1995).€€Ð $X" ÐÐ ô$D # ÐFirst,€the€defendant€claims€that€the€trial€court€erred€in€sentencing€the€defendant€for€theÐ à%0!$ Ðprobation€violation.€€At€the€conclusion€of€the€sentencing€hearing,€the€trial€court€sentenced€theÐ Ì&"% Ðdefendant€to€one€year€of€incarceration€and€to€one€year€of€probation€with€rehabilitation€resulting€fromÐ ¸'#& Ðthe€probation€violation.€€Essentially,€the€defendant€contends€that€the€trial€court€abused€its€discretionÐ ¤(ô#' Ðby€not€considering€the€principles€of€sentencing€and€by€not€again€granting€her€an€alternative€sentence.€Ð )à$( ÐHowever,€a€trial€court€is€not€required€to€reconsider€the€principles€of€sentencing€after€finding€that€aÐ |*Ì%) Ðdefendant€violated€the€terms€of€probation.€€òòÔ#†XAIXXXAIh*#ÔSee,€e.g.óó,€òòState€v.€McLemoreóó,€No.€03C01„9709„CC„Ð h+¸&* Ð00406,€1998€WL€422339€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.,€filed€July€28,€1998,€at€Knoxville).Ô‡XAIXXXAIÔ€The€defendant€hereÐ ° Ðpled€guilty€to€the€probation€violation€and€the€trial€court€was€clearly€within€its€discretion€to€order€aÐ œì Ðterm€of€split€confinement.€€We€find€no€error€in€the€trial€court€ordering€such€a€sentence€for€theÐ ˆØ Ðprobation€violation.Ð tÄ ÐÐ `° ÐNext,€the€defendant€contends€that€the€trial€court€erred€in€sentencing€her€to€three€(3)€years€forÐ L œ Ðthe€theft€of€identity€conviction.€€As€previously€noted,€the€trial€court€applied€three€enhancementÐ 8 ˆ Ðfactors:€Ô#†XAIXXXAI E#Ô€(1)€The€defendant€had€a€previous€history€of€criminal€convictions€and€criminal€behavior,Ð $ t Ðincluding€assault,€forgery,€fraudulent€use€of€a€credit€card,€a€bad€check€charge,€and€admitted€drug€use;Ð  ` Ð(2)€the€defendant€had€an€unwillingness€to€comply€with€conditions€of€a€sentence€involving€releaseÐ ü L  Ðinto€the€community;€and€(3)€the€instant€crime€was€committed€while€the€defendant€was€on€probation.€Ð è 8  ÐThe€trial€court€weighed€the€three€enhancement€factors€against€two€mitigating€factors:€(1)€theÐ Ô$  Ðdefendantððs€conduct€did€not€result€in€or€threaten€serious€bodily€injury,€and€(2)€the€defendant€pledÐ À  Ðguilty,€negating€the€necessity€of€a€trial.€€Ð ¬ü  ÐÐ ˜è  ÐÔ‡XAIXXXAIÔThe€court€noted€the€possible€range€for€the€instant€offense€is€two€to€four€years.€€The€trial€courtÐ „Ô  Ðthen€determined€that,€given€the€weight€of€the€enhancement€factors€over€the€mitigating€factors,€theÐ pÀ Ðdefendantððs€sentence€should€be€three€years,€well€within€the€possible€range.€€In€addition,€the€trial€courtÐ \¬ Ðordered€the€three€years€to€be€served€on€probation.€€In€reviewing€the€record€and€the€trial€courtððsÐ H˜ Ðfindings,€we€conclude€that€the€defendant€has€failed€to€demonstrate€how€the€record€preponderatesÐ 4„ Ðagainst€the€trial€courtððs€imposition€of€a€three€year€sentence€for€the€theft€of€identity€conviction.€€Ð  p ÐÐ  \ ÐFinally,€the€defendant€contends€that€the€trial€court€erred€in€ordering€that€the€two€sentencesÐ øH Ðrun€consecutively.€€In€sentencing€a€defendant,€a€trial€court€may€order€consecutive€sentences€if€theÐ ä4 Ðcourt€finds€by€a€preponderance€of€the€evidence€that€the€defendant€committed€the€offense€while€onÐ Ð  Ðprobation.€€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€40„35„115(b)(6).€€The€defendant€here€pled€guilty€to€the€instant€offenseÐ ¼  Ðand€to€violating€her€probation€as€a€result€of€committing€the€instant€offense€while€on€probation.€€Thus,Ð ¨ø Ðthe€trial€court€was€allowed€to€order€the€two€sentences€to€be€served€consecutively.€€The€defendant€hasÐ ”ä Ðfailed€to€demonstrate€how€the€evidence€preponderates€against€the€trial€courtððs€ordering€consecutiveÐ €Ð Ðsentences.€€€€€Ð l¼ ÐÐ X ¨ ÐÓ  Óòòò òÓ XÓConclusionó óóó€€Ð D!” ÐÓ XiQÓÐ 4"„  ÐÓ  ÓAfter€thorough€review,€we€hold€that€the€trial€court€did€not€err€in€sentencing€the€defendant€toÐ  #p! Ðone€year€incarceration€and€one€year€probation€with€rehabilitation€as€a€result€of€the€probationÐ  $\" Ðviolation.€€We€also€hold€that€the€trial€court€did€not€err€in€sentencing€the€defendant€to€three€yearsÐ ø$H # Ðprobation€for€the€theft€of€identity€conviction,€to€be€served€consecutively€to€the€sentence€resultingÐ ä%4!$ Ðfrom€the€probation€violation.€€Accordingly,€we€affirm€the€judgment€of€the€trial€court.Ð Ð& "% Ѐ€Ô#†XAIXXXAIÅJ#ÔÐ ¼' #& ÐÐ ¨(ø#' ÐÐ ”)ä$( ÐÐ €*Ð%) ÐòòóóÐ l+¼&* Їà0 ` àà0¸ ` (#` (#àà0¸ (#¸ (#àà0h(#(#àà0Àh(#h(#àà0À(#À(#à___________________________________€Ð°(#(# Ðà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  à€€€JOHN€EVERETT€WILLIAMS,€JUDGE