ÿWPC; žk[tl¼€êˆ¼ƒüf­-uÐ?¿¦bÌ&Ïë²Ä‚»¡8’¼c9D ü0n#¿ B ]ukшÁ»•’ÍY7l¼&刋ú§£pfvE` Œ6NRTï –GÏ{†õš ó^ #¼¾:ã»MþJJj¡µ9›þãæÊ ¤i0¼1 :QÈû ôç7ZE¤yAUÒޤêÔWŽË”a•ªL؇3ۼ楱j‹ì"ïûCAH›ÄÅó¢¿/aÖ¥™åè’Ï:È´§=m (½%«ä)°–¹_oÄ=Zá‘kÌ^pàn×;êß’Ù6¡E×5k܍ܯ’d:'ß8¸ õô<ñîû… y󚌪Yݬr`4{f¹Ù$ïaK ƒ’~ŠÅ)•aE¸Ó=e†“ Ò¸ wŠ 4Ž ¢ ± Ƴ ÆyÆ?Æ mËNâ#ÁääE¥¥¥¥¥¥¥¥¥¥¥¥¥¥¥¥¥¥¥ 0D§§§§§bëëëëëëëëëëëëëëëëëëëëëëëëëëëëëëëëëëëë 0óóóó Bõõ 0» D3Í D- 0K-- ASxÆË 0»‘ 0DL A«» ÛÝ ƒR+­$ÝÔ  ÔÓ  Óà  àòòÚ  Ú1Ú  ÚóóÔ€ô¡¥ò»»ÔÝ  ÝÔ_ÔIt€is€the€policy€of€this€Court€to€refer€to€minors€by€initials€rather€than€by€name.(wØ=$¡¡Ô  ÔÑ  ÑÑ€..ÑÑ8€ µ»»dXXdì8ÑÑ ýý ÑÓ  Ó(í€"  Z6Times New Roman Regular(ƒð Z‹(Times New Roman  ´Ý ƒR+­$ÝÔ  ÔÓ  Óà  àòòÚ  Ú2Ú  ÚóóÔ€ô¡¥ò»»ÔÝ  ÝThe€statute€provides€an€exception€to€this€eligibility€requirement€for€offenders€who€would€usually€be€consideredÐ ° Ðunfit€for€probation€because€of€histories€of€chronic€alcohol,€drug€abuse,€or€mental€health€problems€but€whose€special€needsÐ tÄ Ðare€treatable€and€could€best€be€served€in€the€community€rather€than€in€a€correctional€institution.€€òòSee€óóTenn.€Code€Ann.Ð 8ˆ Ððð€40„36„106(c).€€Because€there€is€no€evidence€that€the€Defendant€has€any€such€special€needs,€this€exception€isÐ üL Ðinapplicable.€€€®)â  ˜C:\PROGRA~1\COREL\WORDPE~1\TEMPLATE\CUSTOM~1\REVISE~1.WPTC:\Program Files\Corel\WordPerfect Office 2000\Template\Custom WP Templates\revised standard opinion.wpt•jW)<¿£~1@¥3|xLevel 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5‚Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5„Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5…Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5ÿU‹ÿÀÀÀ˜HP LaserJet 4050 Series PCL 6ÈÈÈÈÈÈÈÈ0(#Ã$òòÚ  Ú0Ú  Úóó- ù-(“G2+­$¤¤Ý ƒØ=!ÝÔ  ÔÑ  ÑÑ€.ÑÑ8€ »»dd8ÑÑ ý ÑÓ  ÓÝ  Ýà  àòòÚ  Ú0Ú  ÚóóÔ€ô¡¥ò»»Ô d(“3‚¸$££Ý ƒØ=!ÝÔ  ÔÑ  ÑÑ€.ÑÑ8€ »»dd8ÑÑ ý ÑÓ  ÓÝ  ÝVVVV'ÿÿdxd)!ÈÈÈÈdxdx( ±þ$’’ò òFigure€Ú  Ú1Ú  Úó ó^_X`YEþÿ<<CÿÿƒLevel 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5(“3‚¸$¢¢Ý ƒØ=!ÝÔ  ÔÑ  ÑÑ€.ÑÑ8€ »»dd8ÑÑ ý ÑÓ  ÓÝ  Ý($$””ò òÚ  Ú1Ú  Úó óX[Z&OLE 2.0 Box <=8ÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿCÿÿ HKKKKÝ ƒØ=!ÝÔ  ÔÑ  ÑÑ€.ÑÑ8€ »»ddÈ8ÑÑ ý ÑÓ  ÓÝ  ÝÔ_ÔÑ  ÑÔ€¼ »»»ÔÑ8€\XXdì»»d8Ñà  àà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà@ttìàÔ‡î\ ÔIN€THE€COURT€OF€CRIMINAL€APPEALS€OF€TENNESSEEˆÐ ° Ðà@WW$ìàAT€KNOXVILLEÔ#†¼ »îî\_#ԈРÖ& ÐÓ  Óà @ àà @` àAssigned€on€Briefs€October€17,€2000Ð üL ÐÔ‡X\X»¼ ÔÌò òÔ#†¼ »XX\t#ÔSTATE€OF€TENNESSEE€v.€NICHOLAS€ROBERTS€BROWNÔ‡X\X»¼ Ôó óÐ úJ ÐÌà@@½½ìàò ò€Appeal€from€the€Circuit€Court€for€Ô_ÔSevierÔ_Ô€CountyÐ ú J Ðà@@øøìàNo.€7624€€€€€€Richard€R.€Vance,€JudgeÐ æ 6 ÐÌÒe°ÒÌà@@ìì*ìàßA€V) °°` d€÷E©` AßÐ ªú  ÐÌà@@TTìàNo.€E1999„00110„CCA„R3„CDÐ ¥õ  ÐDecember€15,€Ô_Ô2000Ô_ÔÐ ‘á  ÐßA€V) °°` dE|` AßÐ }Í  Ðó óÌÓ  ÓThe€Defendant,€Nicholas€Roberts€Brown,€pleaded€guilty€to€one€count€of€statutory€rape.€€Pursuant€toÐ xÈ  Ðhis€plea€agreement,€he€received€a€sentence€of€one€year,€with€the€manner€of€service€of€the€sentence€toÐ d´ Ðbe€determined€by€the€trial€court.€€After€a€sentencing€hearing,€the€Defendant€was€ordered€to€serve€sixtyÐ P  Ðdays€in€jail,€with€the€remainder€of€his€sentence€to€be€served€in€community€corrections.€€In€this€appealÐ <Œ Ðas€of€right,€the€Defendant€argues€that€he€should€have€been€placed€on€immediate€probation.€€We€holdÐ (x Ðthat€the€Defendant€failed€to€establish€his€suitability€for€full€probation,€but€we€modify€the€his€sentenceÐ d Ðto€sixty€days€incarceration€followed€by€supervised€probation€because€the€Defendant€is€statutorilyÐ P Ðineligible€to€participate€in€the€community€corrections€program.€€The€case€is€remanded€for€the€trialÐ ì< Ðcourt€to€determine€the€conditions€of€probation.Ð Ø( ÐÓ=ÓÌò òTenn.€R.€App.€P.€3€Appeal€as€of€Right;€Judgment€of€the€Circuit€Court€Modified€and€CaseÐ ° ÐRemanded.ó óÐ œì ÐÌòòÓ  ÓÔ#†¼ »àX\æ#ÔÔ‡X\X.¼ ÔDavid€H.€Welles,€J.óó,€delivered€the€opinion€of€the€court,€in€which€òòJohn€Everett€Williams,€J.óó€andÐ tÄ ÐòòWilliam€B.€Ô_ÔAcreeÔ_Ô,€Ô_ÔSp.J.Ô_Ôóó,€joined.Ð `° ÐÌEdward€C.€Miller,€Public€Defender,€Ô_ÔDandridgeÔ_Ô,€Tennessee,€for€the€appellant,€Nicholas€RobertsÐ 8!ˆ  ÐBrown.Ð $"t! ÐÌPaul€G.€Summers,€Attorney€General€and€Reporter;€David€H.€Ô_ÔFindleyÔ_Ô,€Assistant€Attorney€General;€AlÐ ü#L# ÐÔ_ÔSchmutzerÔ_Ô,€Jr.,€District€Attorney€General;€and€Steven€Hawkins,€Assistant€District€Attorney€General,Ð è$8 $ Ðfor€the€appellee,€State€of€Tennessee.Ð Ô%$!% ÐÓý ÓÌÐ  ¬'ü"'ý ÐÔ_Ôà@@OO&ìàò òOPINIONó óÔ#†¼ »XX\, #ÔÔ‡X\X»¼ ÔÐ ° ÐÌÔ#†¼ »XX\Ô #ÔÔ‡X\X»¼ ÔÓ  Óà ½ àThe€charges€in€this€case€arose€from€the€nineteen„year„old€Ô#†¼ »XX\,#ÔÔ‡X\X»¼ ÔDefendantððs€consensual€sexualÐ ˆØ Ðrelationship€with€a€fourteen„year„old€girl,€J.R.׃×Ý ƒ)#ÃÝòòÚ  Ú1Ú  ÚóóÝ  Ý×  ×€€At€the€Defendantððs€plea€hearing,€the€State€recited€theÐ tÄ Ðfollowing€facts€underlying€the€offense:Ð `° ÐÌà8 ½ à[S]ometime€back€in€1998€this€defendant€.€.€.€was€having€problems€with€his€home€life,Ð 8 ˆ Ðhe€was€allowed€to€move€into€the€[victimððs]€home.€€The€father€explained€to€him€thatÐ $ t Ða€fourteen€year€old,€his€fourteen€year€old€daughter€also€lived€there€and€told€him€underÐ  ` Ðno€certain€terms€that€he€should€leave€her€alone€and€he€didnððt€expect€anythingÐ ü L  Ðuntoward€to€come€of€him€staying€in€the€home€because€they€wanted€to€give€him€a€placeÐ è 8  Ðto€stay.€ÐÔ$ ½Ð ½Ð  Ðà8 ½ àà  àDespite€those€warnings,€if€the€Court€please,€this€defendant,€the€proof€wouldÐ À  Ðshow,€began€having€sexual€relations€with€her.€€This€defendant€was€nineteen€years€ofÐ ¬ü  Ðage€and€[she]€was€fourteen€years€of€age€and€they€had€sexual€relations€several€times€forÐ ˜è  Ðmonths€after€that€until€finally€it€was€able€to€be€put€a€stop€to.€€Sheððs€presently€pregnantÐ „Ô  Ðand€due€in€August€with€his€baby.ÐpÀ½Ð ½Ð  ÐÌBy€the€time€of€the€sentencing€hearing,€J.R.€had€given€birth€to€a€boy,€who€was€nine€weeks€old.Ð H˜ ÐÌà ½ àJ.R.ððs€father,€Curtis€Rumbaugh,€testified€at€the€sentencing€hearing€that€the€Defendant€was€aÐ  p Ðð ðfriend€of€the€family,ðð€and€he€had€told€the€Defendant€that€the€Defendant€and€J.R.€ð ðcould€be€friendsÐ  \ Ðbut€that€was€as€far€as€they€could€go.ðð€€Mr.€Rumbaugh€discovered€that€J.R.€and€the€Defendant€had€hadÐ øH Ðsexual€intercourse€when€J.R.€ran€away€from€home€because€she€was€pregnant.€€Mr.€Rumbaugh€furtherÐ ä4 Ðtestified€that€the€Defendant€had€made€no€arrangements€to€help€support€the€baby€and€that€theÐ Ð  ÐDefendant€denies€that€the€baby€is€his.€€Ð ¼  ÐÌà ½ àJ.R.€testified€that€she€had€sexual€relations€with€the€Defendant€on€many€occasions€and€that€theÐ ”ä ÐDefendant€knew€she€was€only€fourteen.€€She€knew€that€the€Defendant€was€nineteen.€€She€said€she€isÐ €Ð Ðcertain€that€the€Defendant€is€the€father€of€her€baby,€but€the€Defendant€denies€it.€€She€further€testifiedÐ l¼ Ðthat€she€willingly€engaged€in€sexual€intercourse€with€the€Defendant,€and€she€was€aware€of€the€dangersÐ X ¨ Ðof€having€unprotected€sex.€€She€also€admitted€sending€the€Defendant€multiple€letters,€in€which€sheÐ D!” Ðexpressed€her€love€for€the€Defendant€and€her€anger€at€her€father€for€pursuing€criminal€charges€againstÐ 0"€  Ðthe€Defendant.Ð #l! ÐÌà ½ àThe€Defendant€did€not€testify€at€the€hearing,€but€relied€upon€the€presentence€report.€€TheÐ ô$D # Ðpresentence€report€shows€that€the€Defendant€was€nineteen€years€old€at€the€time€of€the€offense.€€TheÐ à%0!$ ÐDefendant€graduated€from€high€school,€where€he€was€a€ð ðlow€averageðð€student.€€At€the€time€ofÐ Ì&"% Ðsentencing,€he€was€employed€at€Blalock€Construction,€earning€$8.10€an€hour.€€Prior€to€that,€he€workedÐ ¸'#& Ðâ âfor€Wal„Mart€for€over€a€year.€€The€Defendant€was€living€with€his€parents€and€his€sister.€€He€deniedÐ ¤(ô#' Ðany€drug€or€alcohol€use,€and€described€his€physical€and€mental€health€as€ð ðexcellent.ðð€€He€had€no€priorÐ ° Ðcriminal€record.€€Ð œì Ðâ âÌà ½ àThe€probation€officer€stated€in€the€report€that€the€Defendant€ð ðappears€to€be€a€low€riskÐ tÄ Ðcandidate€for€probation.ðð€€However,€the€officer€notedÐ `° ÐÌà8 ½ àthat€the€Defendant€appears€to€be€avoiding€responsibility€for€his€actions.€€In€hisÐ 8 ˆ Ðstatement,€the€Defendant€blames€the€victimððs€father.€€He€wrote,€ð ðI€was€going€to€moveÐ $ t Ðout€and€he€acted€like€he€threw€me€out.€€A€month€later€he€presses€charges€on€me.€Ð  ` ÐBecause€I€was€not€paying€him€rent€money€anymore.ðð€€The€Defendant€blames€Mr.Ð ü L  ÐRumbaugh€for€his€situation€and€not€the€fact€that€he€had€a€sexual€relationship€with€aÐ è 8  Ðminor€child.€€ÐÔ$ ½Ð ½Ð  ÐÌà ½ àSeveral€letters€written€to€J.R.€by€the€Defendant€were€included€in€the€presentence€report.€€InÐ ¬ü  Ðone€letter,€the€Defendant€wrote,€Ð ˜è  ÐÌà8 ½ àBaby€I€have€done€a€lot€of€thinking€and€came€up€with€some€way€me€and€you€can€beÐ pÀ Ðtogether€and€not€worry€about€the€law.€€We€get€married€and€stay€away€from€parent€[sic]Ð \¬ Ðfor€awhile.€€You€donððt€know€how€not€right€this€is€that€your€dad€wonððt€lets€[sic]€us€seeÐ H˜ Ðeach€other€which€is€not€right.€€You€have€my€blood€in€you€and€my€love€of€my€life.€€ThatÐ 4„ ÐI€would€never€cheat€on€ever€because€you€are€part€of€me€that€Iððm€missing.Ð p½Ð ½Ð  ÐÌIn€another€letter€the€Defendant€wrote,€ð ðI€wish€I€could€have€been€their€[sic]€for€my€kids€[sic]€heart€beatÐ øH Ðand€all€the€other€stuff.€€I€love€you€Baby€and€want€you€and€our€kid€to€be€happy€and€thatððs€not€going€toÐ ä4 Ðhappen€because€of€your€dad.ðð€€The€Defendant€also€wrote,€ð ðI€love€you€Baby€and€that€could€neverÐ Ð  Ðchange€inside€but€do€you€in€return€love€me€then€donððt€take€the€stand€Honey€that€leaves€them€with€noÐ ¼  Ðproof.ðð€€Ð ¨ø ÐÌà ½ àIn€sentencing€the€Defendant,€the€trial€judge€stated€that€a€ð ðsubstantial€break€was€given€inÐ €Ð Ðcharging€this€young€manðð€because€each€act€of€sexual€intercourse€could€have€been€charged€as€aÐ l¼ Ðseparate€offense.€€The€trial€judge€also€stated€that€the€letters€written€to€J.R.€by€the€DefendantÐ X ¨ Ðencouraged€J.R.€not€to€testify,€which€could€have€resulted€in€charges€for€attempting€to€coerce€orÐ D!” Ðthreaten€a€witness€into€not€testifying.€€Thus,€the€judge€determined€that€while€multiple€crimes€wereÐ 0"€  Ðcommitted€by€the€Defendant,€he€was€only€charged€with€one.Ð #l! ÐÌà ½ àThe€trial€judge€found€as€enhancing€factors€that€the€offense€was€committed€to€satisfy€theÐ ô$D # ÐDefendantððs€desire€for€sexual€pleasure,€that€the€personal€injury€to€the€victim€was€great€due€to€herÐ à%0!$ Ðpregnancy,€and€that€the€Defendant€abused€a€position€of€private€trust.€€The€judge€stated,€ð ðHeððd€beenÐ Ì&"% Ðtrusted€to€move€into€the€Rumbaughððs€home€where€this€young€lady€lived,€very€susceptible.€.€.€.€TookÐ ¸'#& Ðadvantage€of€a€young€lady€who€was€fourteen€years€of€age€and€who€now€bears€his€child€for€which€heÐ ¤(ô#' Ðhas€taken€no€responsibility€and€shown€no€remorse€whatsoever.ðð€€The€judge€specifically€noted,€ð ðLackÐ )à$( Ðâ âof€remorse€in€this€case€is€a€major€consideration.ðð€€The€court€then€sentenced€the€Defendant€as€follows:Ð |*Ì%) Ðà8 ½ à[T]he€Court€having€already€sentenced€you€to€one€year€does€not€feel€that€this€is€anÐ ° Ðâ âappropriate€case€for€deferred€judgment€and€denies€that€petition€for€the€reasons€IððveÐ œì Ðalready€stated.€€The€Court€feels€that€a€period€of€incarceration€is€warranted€for€the€sameÐ ˆØ Ðreasons€Iððve€already€stated.€.€.€.ÐtĽР½Ð  ÐÌà8 ½ àà  àThe€Court€is€going€to€order€you€to€serve€sixty€days€in€the€county€jail,€day€forÐ L œ Ðday,€followed€by€the€balance€of€that€sentence€being€served€in€the€CommunityÐ 8 ˆ ÐCorrections€Program.€€Ð$ t½Ð ½Ð  ÐÌà ½ àOn€appeal,€the€Defendant€argues€that€he€should€have€been€immediately€placed€on€probation,Ð ü L  Ðrather€than€having€to€serve€part€of€his€sentence€in€incarceration.€€Ô‡X\XXX\ÔWhen€an€accused€challenges€theÐ è 8  Ðlength,€range,€or€manner€of€service€of€a€sentence,€this€Court€has€a€duty€to€conduct€a€òòdeóó€òònovoóó€reviewÐ Ô$  Ðof€the€sentence€with€a€presumption€that€the€determinations€made€by€the€trial€court€are€correct.€€Tenn.Ð À  ÐCode€Ann.€ðð€40„35„401(d).€€This€presumption€is€ð ðconditioned€upon€the€affirmative€showing€in€theÐ ¬ü  Ðrecord€that€the€trial€court€considered€the€sentencing€principles€and€all€relevant€facts€andÐ ˜è  Ðcircumstances.ðð€€òòState€v.€Ashbyóó,€823€S.W.2d€166,€169€(Tenn.€1991).Ð „Ô  ÐÌà ½ àWhen€conducting€a€òòdeóó€òònovoóó€review€of€a€sentence,€this€Court€must€consider:€(a)€the€evidence,Ð \¬ Ðif€any,€received€at€the€trial€and€sentencing€hearing;€(b)€the€presentence€report;€(c)€the€principles€ofÐ H˜ Ðsentencing€and€arguments€as€to€sentencing€alternatives;€(d)€the€nature€and€characteristics€of€theÐ 4„ Ðcriminal€conduct€involved;€(e)€any€statutory€mitigating€or€enhancement€factors;€(f)€any€statementÐ  p Ðmade€by€the€defendant€regarding€sentencing;€and€(g)€the€potential€or€lack€of€potential€forÐ  \ Ðrehabilitation€or€treatment.€€òòState€v.€Thomasóó,€755€S.W.2d€838,€844€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.€1988);€Tenn.Ð øH ÐCode€Ann.€ðððð€40„35„102,€„103,€„210.Ð ä4 ÐÌà ½ àIf€our€review€reflects€that€the€trial€court€followed€the€statutory€sentencing€procedure,€that€theÐ ¼  Ðcourt€imposed€a€lawful€sentence€after€having€given€due€consideration€and€proper€weight€to€the€factorsÐ ¨ø Ðand€principles€set€out€under€the€sentencing€law,€and€that€the€trial€courtððs€findings€of€fact€areÐ ”ä Ðadequately€supported€by€the€record,€then€we€may€not€modify€the€sentence€even€if€we€would€haveÐ €Ð Ðpreferred€a€different€result.€€òòState€v.€Fletcheróó,€805€S.W.2d€785,€789€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.€1991).Ð l¼ ÐÌà ½ àA€defendant€who€ð ðis€an€especially€mitigated€or€standard€offender€convicted€of€a€Class€C,€D,Ð D!” Ðor€E€felony€is€presumed€to€be€a€favorable€candidate€for€alternative€sentencing€options€in€the€absenceÐ 0"€  Ðof€evidence€to€the€contrary.ðð€€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€40„35„102.€€Our€sentencing€law€also€provides€thatÐ #l! Ðð ðconvicted€felons€committing€the€most€severe€offense,€possessing€criminal€histories€evincing€a€clearÐ $X" Ðdisregard€for€the€laws€and€morals€of€society,€and€evincing€failure€of€past€efforts€at€rehabilitation€shallÐ ô$D # Ðbe€given€first€priority€regarding€sentencing€involving€incarceration.ðð€€òòId.óó€ðð€40„35„102(5).€€Thus,€aÐ à%0!$ Ðdefendant€sentenced€to€eight€years€or€less€who€is€not€an€offender€for€whom€incarceration€is€a€priorityÐ Ì&"% Ðis€presumed€eligible€for€alternative€sentencing€unless€sufficient€evidence€rebuts€that€presumption.€Ð ¸'#& ÐBecause€the€Defendant€is€a€Range€I,€standard€offender€who€was€convicted€of€a€Class€E€felony€andÐ ¤(ô#' Ðwho€does€not€have€a€prior€criminal€history,€he€is€presumed€to€be€a€favorable€candidate€for€alternativeÐ )à$( Ðsentencing.€€òòSeeóó€òòid.óó€ðð€40„35„102(6).€€€Ð |*Ì%) ÐÐ h+¸&* Ðà ½ àWhile€the€Defendant€is€presumed€to€be€a€favorable€candidate€for€alternative€sentencing€andÐ ° Ðwhile€probation€is€to€be€automatically€considered€as€a€sentence€alternative€for€eligible€defendants,Ð œì Ðð ðððthe€defendant€is€not€automatically€entitled€to€probation€as€a€matter€of€law.ðððð€€òòState€v.€Hartleyóó,€818Ð ˆØ ÐS.W.2d€370,€373€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.€1991)€(quoting€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€40„35„303€sentencingÐ tÄ Ðcommission€comments).€€The€burden€of€proving€suitability€for€probation€rests€with€the€defendant.€Ð `° ÐòòSeeóó€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€40„35„303(b).€€IÔ#†X\XXX\÷.#Ôn€determining€whether€to€grant€probation,€the€judge€mustÐ L œ Ðconsider€the€nature€and€circumstances€of€the€offense,€the€defendantððs€criminal€record,€his€or€herÐ 8 ˆ Ðbackground€and€social€history,€his€or€her€present€condition,€including€physical€and€mental€condition,Ð $ t Ðthe€deterrent€effect€on€other€criminal€activity,€and€the€likelihood€that€probation€is€in€the€best€interestsÐ  ` Ðof€both€the€public€and€the€defendant.€€òòSeeóó€òòStiller€v.€Stateóó,€516€S.W.2d€617,€620„21€(Tenn.€1974);€òòseeÐ ü L  Ðalsoóó€òòState€v.€Michaelóó,€629€S.W.2d€13,€15€(Tenn.€1982);€òòState€v.€Bonestelóó,€871€S.W.2d€163,€169Ð è 8  Ð(Tenn.€Crim.€App.€1993).€€Denial€of€probation€may€be€based€entirely€on€the€circumstances€of€theÐ Ô$  Ðoffense€when€they€are€of€such€a€nature€as€to€outweigh€all€other€factors€favoring€probation.€€òòState€v.Ð À  ÐBinghamóó,€910€S.W.2d€448,€456€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.€1995).€€Ð ¬ü  ÐÌÔ‡X\XXX\Ôà ½ àIf€the€court€determines€that€a€period€of€probation€is€appropriate,€it€shall€sentence€the€defendantÐ „Ô  Ðto€a€specific€sentence€but€shall€suspend€that€sentence€and€place€the€defendant€on€supervised€orÐ pÀ Ðunsupervised€probation€either€immediately€or€after€the€service€of€a€period€of€confinement.€€òòSeeóó€Tenn.Ð \¬ ÐCode€Ann.€ðððð€40„35„303(c),€40„35„306(a).€€A€sentence€of€probation€following€a€period€ofÐ H˜ Ðconfinement€is€commonly€referred€to€as€ð ðsplit€confinement.ðð€€òòSeeóó€òòid.óó€ðð€40„35„306(a).€€€€€€Ð 4„ ÐÔ#†X\XXX\ C#ÔÔ#†¼ »XX\À#ÔÔ‡X\X»¼ ÔÌÔ‡X\XXX\ÔÔ#†¼ »XX\ÝE#ÔÔ‡X\X»¼ Ôà ½ àThe€Defendant€in€this€case€was€afforded€the€presumption€of€alternative€sentencing€in€that€heÐ  \ Ðwas€given€a€sentence€of€split€confinement.€€òòSeeóó€òòState€v.€Laneóó,€3€S.W.3d€456,€461€(Tenn.€1999).€€HeÐ øH Ðasserts,€however,€that€he€should€have€been€granted€full€probation€instead€of€having€to€serve€a€portionÐ ä4 Ðof€his€sentence€in€confinement.€€In€arguing€that€he€should€have€been€granted€full€probation,€theÐ Ð  ÐDefendant€points€to€his€lack€of€a€criminal€record,€his€stable€employment,€his€youth,€and€hisÐ ¼  Ðimmaturity.€€He€asserts€that€any€ð ðlack€of€acceptanceðð€of€his€responsibility€is€due€to€his€immaturity.Ô#†¼ »XX\?F#ÔÔ‡X\X»¼ ÔÔ#†X\XXX\ýE#ÔÔ‡X\XXX\ԀР¨ø ÐNotwithstanding,€we€are€unable€to€conclude€that€the€trial€court€abused€its€discretion€by€refusing€toÐ ”ä Ðgrant€full€probation.€€The€burden€of€proving€suitability€for€full€probation€was€on€the€Defendant,€andÐ €Ð Ðthe€Defendant€failed€to€meet€that€burden.€€In€sentencing€the€Defendant,€the€trial€court€found€theÐ l¼ Ðexistence€of€three€enhancement€factors,€which€are€not€challenged€by€the€Defendant.€€The€trial€courtÐ X ¨ Ðfurther€relied€upon€the€multiple€acts€of€sexual€intercourse€and€the€Defendantððs€letters€to€J.R.€askingÐ D!” Ðher€not€to€testify€for€the€courtððs€determination€that€the€Defendant€had€committed€criminal€acts€forÐ 0"€  Ðwhich€he€was€not€prosecuted.€€The€trial€court€specifically€found€that€the€Defendantððs€lack€of€remorseÐ #l! Ðwas€a€significant€factor€in€its€determination€that€a€period€of€incarceration€was€appropriate.€€It€appearsÐ $X" Ðthat€the€trial€court€considered€the€sentencing€principles€and€imposed€a€lawful€sentence€by€orderingÐ ô$D # Ða€period€of€confinement.€€Thus,€we€are€compelled€to€uphold€the€sentence€of€sixty€days€incarceration.€Ð à%0!$ Ѐ€€Ð Ì&"% Ðà ½ àHowever,€we€note€that€the€Defendant€was€sentenced€to€community€corrections€following€hisÐ ¸'#& Ðâ âperiod€of€incarceration,€rather€than€to€probation.€€Because€the€Defendant€was€convicted€of€a€sexualÐ ¤(ô#' Ðoffense,€he€is€not€eligible€to€participate€in€the€community€corrections€program.׃×Ý ƒ)#ÃÝòòÚ  Ú2Ú  ÚóóÝ  Ý×  ×€€òòSeeóó€Tenn.€Code€Ann.Ð ° Ðâ âðð€40„36„106(a)(2);€òòState€v.€Bostonóó,€938€S.W.2d€435,€438€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.€1996).€€We€thereforeÐ œì Ðmodify€the€Defendantððs€sentence€to€sixty€days€incarceration€followed€by€supervised€probation,€andÐ ˆØ Ðwe€remand€the€case€to€the€trial€court€to€determine€the€conditions€of€probation.€à - àÐ tÄ ÐÌà ½ àÌÔ#†X\XXX\I#ÔÔ#†¼ »XX\MI#ÔÌÌÌà0 ½ àà0 ½(#½(#àà0m  (# (#àà0Å m (#m (#àà0Å (#Å (#àà0u(#(#àà0Íu(#u(#à______________________________Ðn ¾ Í(#Í(# Ðà ½ àà  àà m àà Å àà  àà u àà Í àDAVID€H.€WELLES,€JUDGE