WPC8 ʶS#nU#ZF#_y:uEd^nd?䨭G`uK唉fy8@`,JIH?Tal ~8Rrvvq&ꮞ=恗~,qk'Qxh[R v*q-zFikQḶRh|/.~UA., <>?bpr'v\ޯ¡Jky; 5TkGݱa(T&;d+q\D=2.p:**&Pp@v}K'QCMyvvfq&zjMC Pt 8*pV?ƕٛ&=$DHuP\μwIr?d/ض_UfrLVO_yY1%n'tgXj]+.Jgƶ_#2UN %I 0:O U N ^ w 4   m N# % U> 0U 0> 0! 0 0 0^ 0 0 0e 0 0 0 0O 0 0 0D 0 0t 0 0 0 0A 0 0 0- 0 0W 0 0 0Q! 0>" 0M" 0E# 0'$ 0 % 0% 0& 0' 0i( 02;) 0m) 0:i* 0Y* 0_* 0 [+ 0e, 0- B*/ D/0 D+F0 0q0 D/w2 02 06t3 03 0:4 0^4 0<J5 1e5U65U*!6 1uK6 726 0c6 0NU72777 0~7ES8 0DU8 B88888b888:8\\IB01S02\CLERKJAC,,,,0(@ Z6Times New Roman RegularX($USUS.,("  Z6Times New Roman Regular1 ~/CCA103|xU    ' ib011r90ib011r9 .   \  `&Times New Roman*+ (_2623  ..*G+G (_25   /%` ` hp x /23  ../%` ` hp x /   *8+8 (_24  ," hp x ,23  ..," hp x ,  *5+5 (_23 ` ) hp x )23  ..) hp x ) ` *2+2 (_22  &hhp x &23  ..&hhp x &  */+/ (_21  #p x #23  ..#p x #  *,+, (_20 h  p x 23  .. p x h *)+) (_19  pp x 23  ..pp x   *&+& (_18   x 23  .. x   *AA (_17  5+ ` hp x 523  Ԁ5+ ` hp x 5  *GG (_16   /%` ` hp x /23  Ԁ/%` ` hp x /   *88 (_15  ," hp x ,23  Ԁ," hp x ,  *55 (_14 ` ) hp x )23  Ԁ) hp x ) ` *22 (_13  &hhp x &23  Ԁ&hhp x &  *// (_12  #p x #23  Ԁ#p x #  *,, (_11 h  p x 23  Ԁ p x h *)) (_10  pp x 23  Ԁpp x   (&& &_9   x 23  Ԁ x   (AA &_8  5+ ` hp x 523  5+ ` hp x 5  (GG &_7   /%` ` hp x /23  /%` ` hp x /   (88 &_6  ," hp x ,23  ," hp x ,  (55 &_5 ` ) hp x )23  ) hp x ) ` (22 &_4  &hhp x &23  &hhp x &  (// &_3  #p x #23  #p x #  (,, &_2 h  p x 23   p x h ()) &_1  pp x 23  pp x   &&& $_   x 23   x   0AA.Normal  5+ ` hp x 55+ ` hp x 5  <AA:Definition T  5+ ` hp x 55+ ` hp x 5  <AA:Definition L , 5+ ` hp x 5  5+ ` hp x 586Definition(hh&H1  5+ ` hp x 5      5+ ` hp x 5  (]]&H2  5+ ` hp x 5  5+ ` hp x 5  (]]&H3  5+ ` hp x 5  5+ ` hp x 5  (]]&H4  5+ ` hp x 5 XXX 5+ ` hp x 5  (]]&H5  5+ ` hp x 5  5+ ` hp x 5  (]]&H6  5+ ` hp x 5  5+ ` hp x 5  2DD0Address  5+ ` hp x 55+ ` hp x 5  8MM6Blockquote , , 5+ ` hp x 5   5+ ` hp x 5,*CITE,dl*CODEKJ<6X9`(Courier NewKS\  `&Times New RomanS42Emphasis64Hyperlink    <:FollowedHype    4go2Keyboard KJ<6X9`(Courier NewKS\  `&Times New RomanS <:Preformatted  /%  ,Kk %#/KJ<6X9`(Courier NewKS\  `&Times New RomanS/%  ,Kk %#/  <:zBottom of 7?(X7    5+ ` hp x 5?K%2A`Arial?  S\  `&Times New RomanS7@(X75+ ` hp x 5  &  d d>)1dxd'dxd<:zTop of For7B(X7    5+ ` hp x 5?K%2A`Arial?  S\  `&Times New RomanS7@(X75+ ` hp x 5  >)2dxd0KS.SampleKJ<6X9`(Courier NewKS\  `&Times New RomanS0.Strong 8dl6TypewriterKJ<6X9`(Courier NewKS\  `&Times New RomanS42Variable: 8HTML MarkupB      2 0CommentB   35;AGMSY_11.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.<6X9`(Courier New%2A`Arial3#37=CIQYag1.a.i.(1)(a)(i)1)a)Li)(;3$2#  0  .3  0  (O$ presentence Crim(.(3($ !USUS.,      0  (#$  0   d- - 0#Xd# [ !USUS.,  _XϯXXX!XXϯ^  @@tt#XϯX!\#xXXϯINTHECOURTOFCRIMINALAPPEALSOFTENNESSEE  @@%ATJACKSON#XϯXx#!XXϯ # AssignedonBriefs @  @` November2,2004 F #XϯX!m#!XXϯ0 @ #XϯX!#!Xϯ#h .!=#! .h_MIKO_ԀT.BURL#h !#! h#XϯX!g#!XXϯv.#XϯX!\#!XXϯ#h !#! hSTATEOFTENNESSEE#h .!##X6X .h# XϯXXX6!XXϯ  f #XϯX!# DirectAppealfromtheCriminalCourtforShelbyCounty 7  @@t t No.P27215Bernie_Weinman_,Judge ! q @@*AVT) ` dE<` A /  @@No.W200400327CCAR3PCFiledDecember23,_2004_ (  AVT) ` dE<` A    ThePetitioner,_Miko_ԀT.Burl,wasconvictedofaggravatedassault,aggravatedburglary,and  especiallyaggravatedrobbery,andthetrialcourtsentencedhimtoaneffectivesentenceoftwenty v fiveyears.Ondirectappeal,thisCourtvacatedthePetitionersaggravatedassaultconviction,but _ affirmedallofthePetitionersotherconvictions.ThePetitionersubsequentlyfiledapetitionfor H postconvictionreliefalleging,amongotherthings,ineffectiveassistanceofcounsel.Aftera 1 hearing,thepostconvictioncourtdismissedthePetitionerspetition.Onappeal,thePetitioner j contendsthatthepostconvictioncourterredbecausethePetitionerstrialcounselwasineffective. S Findingnoreversibleerror,weaffirmthejudgmentofthepostconvictioncourt. < #X6XXXϯj#XϯXXX6#X6XXXϯ #XϯXXX6   Tenn.R.App.P.3AppealasofRight;JudgmentoftheCriminalCourtAffirmed#X6XXXϯ? #XϯXXX6   RobertW._Wedemeyer_,J.,deliveredtheopinionofthecourt,inwhichJerryL.Smithand_J.C._  _McLin_ԀJJ.,joined. z C.Anne_Tipton_,Memphis,Tennessee,fortheappellant,_Miko_ԀT.Burl. L  PaulG.Summers,AttorneyGeneralandReporter;DavidE._Coenen_,AssistantAttorneyGeneral; "n! WilliamL.Gibbons,DistrictAttorneyGeneral;andEmilyCampbell,AssistantDistrictAttorney #W" General#X6XXXϯ #XϯXXX6,fortheappellee,StateofTennessee. #@#     OPINION  %!% #X6XXXϯ#pXϯXXX6@& I.Facts  &!&   #X6XXXϯ#XϯXXX6  OnFebruary7,2000,aShelbyCountyjuryconvictedthePetitionerofaggravatedassault, (#( aggravatedburglary,andespeciallyaggravatedrobbery.ThetrialcourtsentencedthePetitioner, h)$) aRangeIstandardoffender,tofouryearsfortheaggravatedassaultconviction,fouryearsforthe Q*%* aggravatedburglaryconviction,andtwentyfiveyearsfortheespeciallyaggravatedrobbery :+&+ conviction,andorderedthesesentencestorunconcurrently.#X6XXXϯS#ThisCourtsummarizedtheunderlying #,s', factsofthePetitionerscaseondirectappealasfollows:XϯXXX6  -\(-  -E). ^ ^86XXdd8[ ^  8  OnSeptember22,1998,JosephineWoodson,theeightysixyearoldvictim,andher  daughterinlaw,LindaFly,wereatMs.WoodsonshomeinMemphis.Ms.  Woodsonheardsomeoneatthedoor.Thinkingitwasherson,shegotuptolethim  in.Whenshegotup,shewasmetbytheAppellant,whowasholdingaguninher k faceanddemandingmoney.Ms.Woodsongrabbedthegun,andbeganto tussleall T overthefloorwiththeAppellant.TheAppellantthrewMs.Woodsonagainsta =  heater,breakingherribs.Hefledthehomeaftertaking$230fromapocketofMs. & v Woodsonsclothing.Duringtherobbery,theAppellantdroppedapager.Based  _ uponthisfact,theAppellantwasdevelopedasasuspect.Duringtheinvestigation,  H twophotolineupswereshowntoMs.WoodsonandMs.Fly,andbothpositively  1  identifiedtheAppellantastherobber.     Statev._Miko_ԀT.Burl,No.W200002074CCAR3CD,2002WL1483207,at*12(Tenn.Crim.   App.,atJackson,Jan.28,2002),perm.app.denied(Tenn.June24,2002).     Ondirectappeal,thisCourtheldthatthePetitionersconvictionsforbothaggravatedassault W  andespeciallyaggravatedrobberyviolateddoublejeopardyprinciples.Therefore,thisCourt @ vacatedthePetitionersconvictionforaggravatedassault.TheTennesseeSupremeCourtdenied )y thePetitionersrequestforpermissiontoappeal.ThePetitionerfiledapetitionforpostconviction b reliefalleging,amongotherthings,thathewasdeniedeffectiveassistanceofcounsel.Aftera K hearing,thepostconvictioncourtdismissedthepetition,andthePetitionerfiledatimelynoticeof 4 appeal.Onappeal,thePetitionerassertsthatthepostconvictioncourterredwhenitdismissedhis  petitionbasedonitsfindingthattherewasnomerittothePetitionersclaimthathewasdenied  effectiveassistanceofcounsel.#X6XXXϯ%#XϯXXX6  #X6XXXϯB#XϯXXX6  Thefollowingevidencewaspresentedatthepostconvictionhearing:#X6XXXϯ#XϯXXX6ThePetitioner q testifiedthathewasconvictedin2000onthreechargesandwasservingtimeforthoseconvictions Z withtheTennesseeDepartmentofCorrections.Hesaidthathewasarrestedonthosechargesin C 1999andthathewasappointedapublicdefenderingeneralsessionscourtforhispreliminary ,| hearing.Hetestifiedthatanotherpublicdefender,WilliamMoore,wasappointedtorepresenthim e inDivisionII.ThePetitionerexplainedthatMoorerepresentedhimfromMarchuntilNovember N of1999.ThePetitionersaidthat,onNovember30,1999,hisscheduledtrialdate,thetrialcourt  7 relievedMoorefromrepresentinghimandinstructedthePetitionertoreturntocourtforhistrialon !   January24,2000,withanattorney.ThePetitionersaidthat,priortoNovember30,1999,hebegan " ! workingforatemporaryserviceinanattempttogetthemoneytohireanattorney.Heexplained #" thathedidnothaveenoughmoneytohireanattorneyuntil acoupleofdaysbeforehisJanuary $# 24,2000,courtdate.Hetestifiedthat,acoupleofdaysbeforeJanuary24,2000,hespoketoa t% $ lawyer,Marvin_Ballin_,whocamewithhimtocourtonJanuary24,2000.ThePetitionersaidthat, ]&!% after_Ballin_Ԁcamewithhimtocourtonthe24th,herefusedtorepresenthimandtoldthePetitioner F'"& tocometohisofficetoobtainarefundofhisretainer.ThePetitionersaidthathewastakeninto /(#' custodywhenhecametocourtonthe24th,andstayedincustodyuntil12:30p.m.thatsameday. )h$( Thereafter,thecourtreleasedhimtofindanattorneyandtoldhimtobebackatcourtby1:30p.m., *Q%) withanattorneypreparedtorepresenthim. *:&*  +#'+   ThePetitionertestifiedthathecontactedBrentStein( Counsel)torepresenthim,and,after  hespokewithCounselfortwentytothirtyminutes,CounselcamebacktocourtwiththePetitioner  at1:30p.m.ThePetitionersaidthatheandCounseldidnotdiscussstrategiesorpotentialwitnesses  onthatday.HesaidthatCounselaskedfor,andwasgranted,acontinuance,andthetrialwasset k forFebruary2,2000.ThePetitionertestifiedthatthecourtheldhimincontemptandheremained T incustodyfortendays.HesaidthatCounselcametovisithimonceandtheyspokeaboutthecase =  forapproximatelyfifteenminutes,whentheydiscussed,amongotherthings,howCounselcould & v contactthePetitionerswitnesses.Additionally,thePetitionersaidthatCounselmetwithhim right  _ before[he]wenttotrial.  H   ThePetitionertestifiedthatCounselneverdiscussedwithhimanydiscoverythathehad    receivedfromtheState,anypretrialmotionsthatneededtobefiled,oranydefenses.ThePetitioner   saidthathismeetingwithCounselonthedayoftriallastedbetweentenandfifteenminutesand   thattheydiscussedpickingajuryandthePetitionerswitnesses.ThePetitionersaidthatCounsel   hadanassistantwithhimatthismeeting.Hetestifiedthat,athistrial,hetestifiedonhisownbehalf, n  andCounselneverreviewedwhathistestimonywouldbewithhimpriortohistestifying.The W  PetitionersaidthatCounselnevertoldhimifheinvestigatedthecrimescene.ThePetitionersaid @ thatoneofthetwoeyewitnessesmisidentifiedhimatthepreliminaryhearing,andtheotherwitness )y saidthathelookedliketheperson,buttestifiedthattheintruderworeahat. b   ThePetitionersaidthatCounselfiledamotiontosuppressthetwowitnessesidentification 4 ofhim,andthatthetrialjudgeshouldhavegrantedthatmotion.ThePetitionertestifiedthatCounsel  nevertoldhimwhetherheobtainedavideotapeofthepreliminaryhearing,andCounselnever  talkedtotheStateswitnessespriortotrial.ThePetitionersaidthatCounselcrossexaminedthe  witnessesagainsthimandcalledhisalibiwitnesses.HetestifiedthatCounselrepresentedhimon  appealandfiledabriefonhisbehalf.HesaidhefiledacomplaintwiththeBarbecauseCounsel q didnotvisithimtodiscusshisappeal.Further,hetestifiedthathisconvictionswereaffirmedinpart Z andreversedinpart,buthewascurrentlyincarceratedonthetwentyfiveyearsentenceforthe C especiallyaggravatedrobberyconviction.ThePetitionersaidthatCounselfiledaRule11 ,| application,butitwasdeniedbytheSupremeCourt. e   Oncrossexamination,thePetitionersaidthathebecamedispleasedwithhisfirstattorney  7 andsohehadhimdismissed.HesaidthathewaschargedwiththesecrimesonFebruary25,1999, !   andfirstappearedincourtonMarch17,1999.Hesaidthat,onhistrialdateinNovemberof1999, " ! hetoldthejudgethathewantedtohireanotherattorney.ThePetitionersaidthathehiredanother #" attorneywhodidnotwanttorepresenthimandreturnedhisretainer.ThePetitionertestifiedthat $# hehiredCounsel,andCounselrequestedacontinuancethatthetrialcourtgranted.ThePetitioner t% $ concededthatCounselspokewithhim,gothisfilefromhisfirstattorney,andspokewithhisalibi ]&!% witnesses.ThePetitioneralsoconcededthatCounseltried inearnesttogetthephotographic F'"& identificationsuppressed. /(#'   CounseltestifiedthathecurrentlypracticescriminallawexclusivelyinShelbyCountyand *Q%) haddonesosince1963_._ԀCounseltestifiedthathehadrepresenteddefendantschargedwith *:&* aggravatedburglaryorespeciallyaggravatedrobberyinoverfiftycases.Counseltestifiedthathe +#'+ representedthePetitioner,buthecouldnotlocatehisfileonthematter.HesaidthatthePetitioner  cameintohisofficeandtoldhimthattwootherattorneysrefusedtorepresenthim.Hesaidthatthe  Petitionerhadaproblemwiththetrialjudge,whotoldhimtofindanattorney,andthePetitioner  startedcryingwhentellingCounselaboutthesituation.Counseltestifiedthathebeganrepresenting k thePetitionertwoweekspriortothePetitionerstrial.Hesaidthathehadfulldiscovery,had T receivedthePetitionersfilefromhispreviousattorney,andheknewwhattheissueswere.Counsel =  testifiedthatheinvestigatedthealibiwitnessesandthathewasreadytotrythecase.Counsel & v testifiedthathecouldnotrememberwhetherhelistenedtothetapefromthePetitionerspreliminary  _ hearing.HesaidthathedidnotdiscussdefensestrategieswiththePetitionerbecausethePetitioner  H saidthathewasnotatthesceneofthecrime,therefore,thedefensewasoneofmistaken  1  identification.Counselsaidthathearguedmistakenidentificationtothejury.      Counselsaidthathefiledamotiontosuppressthephotographicidentification,butitwas   denied.Hesaidthathearguedthatissueonappeal,buttheCourtdeniedthatissue.Counselsaid   that,eventhoughhecalledthealibiwitnesses,thejurydidnotbelievethePetitionersalibi n  witnessesbecausethejuryfoundthePetitionerguilty.Counseltestifiedthathebelievedthathewas W  preparedforthePetitionerstrial. @   Oncrossexamination,Counseltestifiedthathedidnotrecallhowmanytimeshespokewith b thePetitioner,buthetalkedtohiman adequateenoughtimetounderstandwhathisposition[was] K andhow[he]wasgoingtoproceedtotrial.Counselsaidthatitwaslessthantwoweeksbetween 4 thetimethathetookthePetitionerscaseandwhenthecasewastried.Counselstatedthathetalked  toeverywitnessbeforehecalledthemtotestify.Counselsaidthathecrossexaminedthewitness  whochangedherstoryandthathebroughtthatfactoutbeforethejury.Counseltestifiedthatthe  Petitionertoldhimthathewasnotguiltyandthathewouldnotacceptanykindofoffer.Counsel  saidthathenevervisitedthecrimescene.HesaidthatthePetitionertestifiedonhisownbehalfand q madeagoodwitness.Counseltestifiedthat,afterthetrial,hedidnotdiscusstheissuesforappeal Z withthePetitioner.CounseltestifiedthathedidnotraisetheissuethattheCourtofCriminal C Appealsreversed.Healsosaidthathedidnothireaprivateinvestigatorinthiscasebecausehewas ,| familiarwiththefacts,thetheory,andthewitnesses. e   Thepostconvictioncourttookthisevidenceandtheargumentsofcounselunderadvisement  7 and,initsorderdenyingthePetitionerpostconvictionrelief,thepostconvictioncourtstated: !   8  Thiscasepresentsasomewhatunusualsetofcircumstances.The[Petitioner]was #" representedbyamemberofthepublicdefendersofficeathispreliminaryhearing $# andanothermemberofthepublicdefendersofficewasappointedtorepresenthim t% $ inthetrialcourt.Accordingtothe[_P]etitioner_stestimonythisattorneywas ]&!% appointedinMarchof1999.InNovemberof1999atthejointrequestofthe F'"& [Petitioner]andthepublicdefendertheattorneywasrelievedofhisresponsibilityto /(#' representthe[Petitioner]attrialandthetrialcourtorderedthe[Petitioner]toreturn )h$( tocourtinJanuary2000withaprivateattorneyreadytogototrial.The[_P]etitioner_ *Q%) statedthathewasworkingforatemporaryserviceandwasunabletoearnenough *:&* topayanattorneyaretaineruntiltwodayspriortothetrialdate.Hestatedthathe +#'+ paidaretainertooneattorneyandwhenthatattorneyfoundoutthathewouldhave  tobereadyfortrialonsuchshortnoticeherefundedthe[_P]etitioner_smoneyandthe  [_P]etitioner_Ԁlocatedanotherattorneywhodidrepresenthimattrial.Onthedate  whenthecasewassetfortrialtheattorneyrequestedacontinuance,thetrialjudge k grantedatendaycontinuanceand[thePetitioner]washeldincontemptofcourtand T placedincustody.=    8   ` Intheinterimthetrialattorneyfiledamotiontosuppressthephoto  _ identificationwhichmotionwasheardandoverruledbythetrialcourt.  H Unfortunatelythetrialattorneycouldnotlocatehisfilepriortothehearingonthis  1  petitionforpostconvictionrelief.     8      8   ` TheCourtfindsfromalltheevidencepresentedatthishearingthatthetrial   attorneywasabletoobtainandfullyreviewthepublicdefendersfilepriortotrial.   Hediscussedthecasewiththe[Petitioner]andinterviewedthealibiwitnesses.He n  developedadefenseofmistakenidentificationandattrialheputonproofofanalibi, W  andhecrossexaminedtheStateswitnessesconcerningtheiridentification.@   8      8   ` ....b   8      8   ` TheCourtfindsthatthetrialattorneycompetentlycrossexaminedtheStates 4 witnessesconcerningtheiridentificationofthe[Petitioner]andinadditionputonall  thealibiproofavailabletohim....TheCourtfindsthatunderthetimeconstraints  involvedinthiscasetheattorneymorethanadequatelyrepresentedhisclient.   8   ` ....q   8      8   ` Byholdingthe[Petitioner]incontemptobviouslythetrialcourtfoundthat C the[Petitioner]didnotexerciseduediligenceinobtainingprivatecounselwhich ,| causedadditionaldelaysinthetrial.Itwouldappearthatthe[Petitioner]was e responsiblefortheshortperiodoftimethatdefensecounselhadtopreparefortrial. N     8   ` TheCourtfindsthattheadvicegivenandtheservicesrenderedbythe !   [Petitioners]counsel_w[ere_]withintherangeofcompetencydemandedbyan " ! attorneyinacriminalcaseandthatMr.Steinsrepresentationofthe[Petitioner]at #" histrialcompliedwiththerequirementssetoutbytheSupremeCourtofTennessee $# inBaxterv.Rose,523S.W.2d930.t% $   ItisfromthisorderofthepostconvictioncourtthatthePetitionernowappeals. F'"& #X6XXXϯ.#X6XXX6@$ II.Analysis )h$(  #X6XXX6qX#X6XXX6  Onappeal,thePetitionercontendsthatthepostconvictioncourterredbynotgrantinghim *;&* postconvictionreliefbecausehistrialcounselwasineffective.#X6XXX6X#ԀSpecifically,thePetitionerasserts +$'+ thatCounselsassistancewasineffectivebecauseCounselfailedtoestablisharelationshipwithhim  andbecause_Counsel_ԀfailedtoadequatelyinvestigatethePetitionerscase.Inordertoobtain  post-convictionrelief,apetitionermustshowthathisorherconvictionorsentenceisvoidor  voidablebecauseoftheabridgmentofaconstitutionalright.Tenn.CodeAnn.40-30-103(2003). k Thepetitionerbearstheburdenofprovingfactualallegationsinthepetitionforpost-conviction T reliefbyclearandconvincingevidence.Tenn.CodeAnn.40-30-110(f).Apost-conviction =  courtsfactualfindingsaresubjecttoadenovoreviewbythisCourt;however,wemustaccord & v thesefactualfindingsapresumptionofcorrectness,whichisovercomeonlywhenapreponderance  _ oftheevidenceiscontrarytothepost-convictioncourtsfactualfindings.Fieldsv.State,40S  H .W.3d450,456(Tenn.2001).Apost-convictioncourtsconclusionsoflawaresubjecttoapurely  1  denovoreviewbythisCourt,withnopresumptionofcorrectness.Id.at457.       TherightofacriminallyaccusedtorepresentationisguaranteedbyboththeSixth   AmendmenttotheUnitedStatesConstitutionandArticleI,section9,oftheTennesseeConstitution.   Statev.White,114S.W.3d469,475(Tenn.2003);Statev.Burns,6S.W.3d453,461(Tenn.1999); n  Baxterv.Rose,523S.W.2d930,936(Tenn.1975).Thisrighttorepresentationincludestheright W  to reasonablyeffectiveassistance.Burns,6S.W.3dat461.TheTennesseeSupremeCourthas @ heldthattheissueofineffectiveassistanceofcounselisamixedquestionoflawandfactand,as )y such,issubjecttoadenovoreview.Id. b   Inreviewingaclaimofineffectiveassistanceofcounsel,thisCourtmustdeterminewhether 4 theadvicegivenorservicesrenderedbytheattorneyarewithintherangeofcompetencedemanded  ofattorneysincriminalcases.Baxter,523S.W.2dat936.Toprevailonaclaimofineffective  assistanceofcounsel,apetitionermustshowthat counselsrepresentationfellbelowanobjective  standardofreasonableness,_Strickland_Ԁv.Washington,466U.S.668,688(1984),andthatthis  performanceprejudicedthedefense,resultinginafailuretoproduceareliableresult.Id.at687; q Cooperv.State,849S.W.2d744,747(Tenn.1993).Tosatisfytherequirementofprejudice,a Z petitionermustshowareasonableprobabilitythat,butforcounselsunreasonableerror,thefact C finderwouldhavehadreasonabledoubtregardingthepetitionersguilt._Strickland_,466U.S.at695. ,| Thisreasonableprobabilitymustbe sufficienttoundermineconfidenceintheoutcome.Id.at694; e seealsoHarrisv.State,875S.W.2d662,665(Tenn.1994).Incasesinvolvingaguiltypleaora N pleaofnolocontendere,thepetitionermustshowprejudicebydemonstratingthat,butforcounsels  7 errors,hewouldnothavepleadedguiltybutwouldhaveinsistedupongoingtotrial.SeeHillv. !   _Lockhart_,474U.S.52,59(1985);_Bankston_Ԁv.State,815S.W.2d213,215(Tenn.Crim.App.1991). " !   Whenevaluatinganineffectiveassistanceofcounselclaim,thereviewingcourtshouldjudge $# theattorneysperformancewithinthecontextofthecaseasawhole,takingintoaccountallrelevant t% $ circumstances._Strickland_,466U.S.at690;Statev.Mitchell,753S.W.2d148,149(Tenn.Crim. ]&!% App._1988)._ԀThereviewingcourtmustevaluatethequestionableconductfromtheattorneys F'"& perspectiveatthetime._Strickland_,466U.S.at690;Cooper,849S.W.2dat746;_Hellard_Ԁv.State, /(#' 629S.W.2d4,9(Tenn.1982).Indoingso,thereviewingcourtmustbehighlydeferentialand )h$(  shouldindulgeastrongpresumptionthatcounselsconductfallswithinthewiderangeof *Q%) reasonableprofessionalassistance.Burns,6S.W.3dat462.Counselshouldnotbedeemedtohave *:&* beenineffectivemerelybecauseadifferentprocedureorstrategymighthaveproducedadifferent +#'+ result.Williamsv.State,599S.W.2d276,279-80(Tenn.Crim.App.1980). Thefactthata  particularstrategyortacticfailedorhurtthedefensedoesnot,standingalone,establishunreasonable  representation.Housev.State,44S.W.3d508,515(Tenn.2001)(citationomitted);Thomas  BrandonBookerv.State,No.W2003-00961-CCA-R3-PC,2004WL587644,at*4(Tenn.Crim. n App.,atJackson,Mar.24,2004),noperm.app.filed.However,deferencetomattersofstrategyand W tacticalchoicesappliesonlyifthechoicesareinformedonesbaseduponadequatepreparation. @  House,44S.W.3dat515. ) y X6XXX6  Afterthroughlyreviewingtherecord,weconcludethatthePetitionerwasnotdenied  K effectiveassistanceofcounsel.ThePetitionertestifiedthathewasfoundindigentandthetrialcourt  4  appointedanattorneytorepresenthim.ThePetitionerwaiteduntilthedayofhistrialtoinformthe    trialcourtthathewasdissatisfiedwithhisattorneyandthathewishedtohireanotherattorney.The   trialcourtgavethePetitionertwomonthstofindanotherattorney.ThePetitionerwaitedagainuntil   thedayofhistrialtofindanotherattorney,Counsel,whoagreedtorepresenthim.Counselasked   for,andwasgranted,acontinuancetopreparefortrial,butthePetitionerwasfoundincontemptof q  courtfornothavinghisattorneypreparedfortrialonthetrialdate.Despitetheshortoneweektime Z  periodthatCounselhadtopreparefortrial,Counselfiledamotiontosuppressaphotographic C lineup,metwiththePetitioner,thePetitionerswitnesses,andpreparedfortrial.ThePetitioners ,| defensewasoneofmistakenidentification,andheprovidedalibiwitnesseswhotestified.The e Petitioneralsotestifiedonhisownbehalf.Thefactthatthejuryaccreditedthetestimonyofthe N Stateswitnesses,overthetestimonyofthePetitioner,doesnotprovethatCounselwasineffective. 7 CounseltestifiedthathewasfullypreparedtodefendthePetitionerattrial,andhedefendedthe   Petitionertothebestofhisability.Weconclude,asdidthepostconvictioncourt,thatthePetitioner   hasfailedtoprovebyclearandconvincingevidencethatCounselsrepresentation#X6XXX6q#fellbelowan  objectivestandardofreasonablenessX6XXX6.  #X6XXX6z#X6XXX6@NN" III.Conclusion ]    Inaccordancewiththeforegoingreasoningandauthorities,#X6XXX6]z#XϯXXX6weaffirmthepostconviction 1 courtsjudgmentdismissingthePetitionerspetitionforpostconvictionrelief.#X6XXXϯ'{#X6XXX6 j #X6XXX6{#XϯXXX6   `     h     ___________________________________ !%     `     h     ROBERTW.WEDEMEYER,JUDGE#X6XXXϯL|#X6XXX6Ԁ#X6XXX6܉}#