WPCV= :5ƒyrQi䛵('x/}۝\+r{v ͮ72AIr|h`.6:񓨺vaU1\j˺n\EM3' yiM.x„tWĭHxYqc{[kyz cavHI,GФH-lU\׋6c*I(wrwm}@̷(R>6î4Nv&@n(.`-W~ 撴>!lC%^ǪxA1Xڭ$N? h:Ɯ;2pqIf24!unvO!D>gOZf:jj aBtp&ϝGӮwP_? g3T4jhMhGDc_W\q+J_S R7R .H|G]=%FJ.2n{k@H+k+8Fv 5&9~?_qU|lU>& 0  0 0 0% 08 0K 0^ 0q 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0! 0" 0# 0$ 0% 0& 0<Z' 0<' D+' A'@ (o(@ 5)o?)-)E)>* 0D,, 0- 0t. 0()/ AQQ/b/ 1g/ 700-40 Ba0 0C~0O0-4-=4U>j4-44 %44444"4 05 B-6 B+A6l6 0|6#7U :88M9(9N=9 1u?9 729^ 9w949 : m :#:UN8:::::::S:::::::-;-H;-u;u;u;f;;;UN=\  `&Times New Roman'  4Valued Gateway Client40Valued Gateway Client .   2[+[ 0_level1   , 8.` hp x (#823  ..   8.` hp x (#8  2[+[ 0_level2   X 8.` hp x (#823  ..   8.` hp x (#8  2[+[ 0_level3    8.4` hp x (#823  ..   8.` hp x (#8  2[+[ 0_level4    8.` ` hp x (#823  ..   8.` hp x (#8  2[+[ 0_level5    8. ` hp x (#823  ..   8.` hp x (#8  2[+[ 0_level6    8. ` hp x (#823  ..   8.` hp x (#8  2[+[ 0_level7   4 8. ` hp x (#823  ..   8.` hp x (#8  2[+[ 0_level8   ` 8.` hp x (#823  ..   8.` hp x (#8  2[+[ 0_level9    8.<` hp x (#823  ..   8.` hp x (#8  2[[ 0_levsl1   , 8.` hp x (#823  Ԁ   8.` hp x (#8  2[[ 0_levsl2   X 8.` hp x (#823  Ԁ   8.` hp x (#8  2[[ 0_levsl3    8.4` hp x (#823  Ԁ   8.` hp x (#8  2[[ 0_levsl4    8.` ` hp x (#823  Ԁ   8.` hp x (#8  2[[ 0_levsl5    8. ` hp x (#823  Ԁ   8.` hp x (#8  2[[ 0_levsl6    8. ` hp x (#823  Ԁ   8.` hp x (#8  2[[ 0_levsl7   4 8. ` hp x (#823  Ԁ   8.` hp x (#8  2[[ 0_levsl8   ` 8.` hp x (#823  Ԁ   8.` hp x (#8  2[[ 0_levsl9    8.<` hp x (#823  Ԁ   8.` hp x (#8  2[[ 0_levnl1   , 8.` hp x (#823     8.` hp x (#8  2[[ 0_levnl2   X 8.` hp x (#823     8.` hp x (#8  2[[ 0_levnl3    8.4` hp x (#823     8.` hp x (#8  2[[ 0_levnl4    8.` ` hp x (#823     8.` hp x (#8  2[[ 0_levnl5    8. ` hp x (#823     8.` hp x (#8  2[[ 0_levnl6    8. ` hp x (#823     8.` hp x (#8  2[[ 0_levnl7   4 8. ` hp x (#823     8.` hp x (#8  2[[ 0_levnl8   ` 8.` hp x (#823     8.` hp x (#8  2[[ 0_levnl9    8.<` hp x (#823     8.` hp x (#8  6B 54Heading 1XXX         <:Default Para<:Footnote Ref'dxd!&Draw Object <<=8C HKKKK$ WPC i K513%)+-51d~ -& WPC i K513%)+-51d~ - #       ;            *\)..      IXIX8I  _B.` hp x (#XB/hWGCz hx p @X@Exxxx (#(#   (#(#(2\$ G!..      IͷXIXIͷ  ݃ Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 4 Level 5(2\$ G!..      IͷXIXIͷ  (2\$ G!..      IͷXIXIͷ  ($+,-.!C<< c- - 35=CIOU[a1(1)a.i.1.a.i.1.a.1 i.    #       d($     E G!..      IXIX8I  _B.` hp x (#XB  X       1   G  XX8Ԁ8XXThedefendantmissedascheduledmeetingandfailedtoscheduleanotherappointment.Afteracoupleof  weeks,PrattrealizedthathehadnotseenthedefendantandfinallymanagedtocontacthimontheFridaypriortothe  hearingbutwasunabletocompletethereportssocialhistory.XX8mU8XX #       #      \  `&Goudy Old Style #         IX     (2d9$ G!..      IͷXIXIͷ  X  0  )Hairline d'Single1  d#|x(r$..      IOXIXIOHP LaserJet 4000 Series PCL 60,yAZ"Arial Regular3#37=CIQYag1.a.i.(1)(a)(i)1)a)Ni)M) J~'\aU   6Times New Roman Regular 0#VmVd# 0   I      )     #       #       #       \ ,\"..      IXIX8I  _B.` hp x (#XB  XX8#kCVd#ф  3  ڄ  6Times New Roman Regular G!..      IXIX8I  _         0p x (#X0]8W\_U'y=(34y=cy=dy= ey= 8y= 9y= ;y= <Q INTHECOURTOFCRIMINALAPPEALSOFTENNESSEE  9 g p x (#X(#9 g Q$ATNASHVILLE      K.` hp x (#g X(#KJune20,2000Session  XX]]XX STATEOFTENNESSEEv.JEFFREY_ANTWON_ԀBURNSXX]     DirectAppealfromtheCircuitCourtforWilliamsonCounty   No.II29870TimothyL.Easter,TrialJudge   -  8XX "#k[W$~ Kp@0 dd`  KED K KD2 -  XX8 No.M199901830CCAR3CDFiledOctober13,2000 9  -  8XX "%k[W$~ Kp@0 dd`  KE K K2 -  XX8    Thedefendant,convictedofonecountofsaleofacounterfeitcontrolledsubstance,appealshis J  convictionandsentenceassertingthat:(1)theevidencewasinsufficienttosupporttheverdict 0 and(2)thetrialcourterredinsentencinghimtooneandonehalfyearsofincarceration.We  affirmtheconvictionandholdthatwhilethedefendantdidnotutterasinglewordduringthis  drugtransaction,sufficientcircumstantialevidenceexistedtoallowthejurytoconcludethatthe  defendantintendedtosellacounterfeitcontrolledsubstance.Further,weaffirmthesentenceas x imposed. ^    Tenn.R.App.P.3AppealasofRight;JudgmentoftheCircuitCourtAffirmed  *z   JohnEverettWilliams,J.,deliveredtheopinionofthecourt,inwhichDavidH.Welles,and F JerryL.Smith,JJ.joined. , J.TimothyStreet,Franklin,Tennessee,fortheappellant,Jeffrey_Antwon_ԀBurns.  PaulG.Summers,AttorneyGeneralandReporter;JenniferL._Bledsoe_,AssistantAttorney t General;RonaldL.Davis,DistrictAttorneyGeneral;andRobertHarris_Hassell_ԀII,Assistant Z   DistrictAttorney,fortheappellee,StateofTennessee. @!!   OPINION  #B$  ̀Introduction  %!&   XThedefendant,Jeffrey_Antwon_ԀBurns,wasconvictedbyajuryintheWilliamsonCounty '"( CircuitCourtofonecountofSaleofaCounterfeitControlledSubstanceafteraconfidential p(#) informant(CI)attemptedtopurchasecrackcocainefromhim.SeeTenn.CodeAnn.3917 V)$* 423.Afterconviction,thetrialcourtsentencedthedefendanttooneandonehalfyears <*%+ incarceration,tobeservedconcurrentlywithaseparatefelonydrugconviction.Fromtheinstant "+r&, convictionandsentence,thedefendantnowappeals,arguing: ,X'-  1 (03N""  X ,E.` hp x (#X(#E  ,  B+4 4` hp x (#X(#B2(  1  )3   4   Theevidenceadducedattrialisinsufficienttosupporthisconviction;and݌ ,>(. Ќ  ' X(#44` X(#' X  ""  X ,E.` hp x (#X(#E  ,  B+4 4` hp x (#X(#B2(  2  )3   4   Thetrialcourterredinsentencinghimtooneandonehalfyearsincarceration.݌ -$)/ W W8V8Vdd80 W  ь  ' X(#44` X(#' X  _ XAftercarefulreview,weaffirmboththeconvictionandsentence.    Facts |  X   Whilethefactsituationinthiscaseisunique,abasicoutlineisclear:Withoutasingle H spokenword,thedefendant,inresponsetotheCIsofferof$20,rodehisbicycletotheCIscar, . ~ removeda rockfromhismouth,placeditintheCIshand,tookthe$20billfromtheCI,and  d thenrodeaway.Thedefendantwasthenarrested.The rock,althoughresemblingcrack  J cocaineinsize,shapeandcolor,latertestednegativeforanycontrolledsubstance.  0     XXXX       X&    TrialTestimony[  )Ԍ    Ќ  XXXX  XOnAugust8,1997,WilliamsonCountySheriffsDepartmentDetectivesBarryKincaid x  andJackFrantzconductedacontrolledpurchase,forcrackcocaine,aScheduleIIcontrolled ^  substance.Inthecontrolledpurchase,thedetectivesusedaCI,unaccompaniedbyanofficer,to D  makethebuy.ThedetectivessearchedboththeCIspersonandvehicletoensurethatneither *z  containedanycontrolledsubstance.TheythenequippedtheCIwithanaudiotransmitterandhis ` truckwithaudioandvideoequipment.Finally,theyissuedtheCItwentydollarsandfollowed F himintheirvehicletotheNatchezStreetareainFranklin,Tennessee.Afterlosingsightofthe , CI,thedetectivespulledintoaparkinglotandmonitoredsubsequenteventsthroughtheaudio  equipment.'  O   X XTheCIdrovedownNatchezStreetandsawthedefendantonabicycle,describingthe t defendantsclothingandthebicycleovertheaudioequipment.Toinitiatethepurchaseofa Z twentydollar rockofcrackcocaine,theCIhelduptwofingersandmouthedtheword @  twenty.Thedefendantapproachedthetruck,nodded,pulleda rockfromhismouth,and &v exchangeditforthemoney.Kincaiddrovethroughtheareaandidentifiedthedefendantfrom  \ theCIsdescriptionofthedefendantsclothingandbicyclegivenbytheCI,wholateridentified B thedefendantinaphotolineup.Thedefendant,whoremainedoutsidetheCIsvehicleduring ( thepurchase,wasnotvisibleonthevideotape.   X XTennesseeBureauofInvestigation(TBI)forensicscientistGlennEveretttestifiedthatthe   purchasedsubstancetestednegativeforcontrolledsubstances.However,Everetttestifiedthat p!  thesubstanceresembledcrackcocaineinsize,shape,andcolor. V"!  X XAfterconvictionforsaleofacounterfeitcontrolledsubstance,thedefendantthenentered "$r# aguiltypleatoaseparatefelonyScheduleIIcontrolledsubstancecharge.Atthesentencing %X $ hearingforbothconvictions,DavidPratt,thedefendantsprobationofficer,testifiedthatthepre %>!% sentencereportreflectedthatthedefendanthadajuvenilerecordandthatthedefendanthadbeen &$"& onprobationfortwoassaultconvictionsfromtheWilliamsonCountyGeneralSessionsCourt. ' #' HisprobationforoneassaultconvictionhadbeenrevokedonMay7,1997. (#(  X )$) \_ \  ) \  5 l<`  XPrattalsotestifiedthatthedefendanthadtoldhimthathehadchildrentosupportandthat  heworkedforCokesTreeSurgeryinWilliamsonCounty.Prattalsostatedthatthedefendant  toldhimhereceivedhisGED,butthatstatementhadnotbeenconfirmed.    'G  7 6  1      ׀ |  X XThetrialcourtappliedthreeenhancementfactorsandtwomitigatingfactorstotheinstant H conviction.Givingminimalweighttothemitigatingfactors,thatcourtimposedoneandone . ~ halfyearsincarceration,outofapossibletwoyearmaximumterm.  d  X XThetrialcourtdeniedCommunityCorrectionsbecauseofthedefendantshistoryof  0 violentcrimes.Probationwasalsodeniedbecausethetrialcourtdeterminedthatconfinement    wasnecessarytoavoiddepreciatingtheseriousnessoftheoffenseandincarcerationwas    particularlysuitedtodeterothersfromcommittingthecrime.Thetrialcourtfurtherheldthat   measureslessrestrictivethanconfinementhadfrequentlyorrecentlybeenunsuccessfully x  appliedtothedefendant,asindicatedbyhisinabilitytocompleteprobationoutofGeneral ^  SessionsCourt.Therefore,thetrialcourtdeniedalternativesentencing. D   X  ANALYSIS ` SufficiencyofEvidence  ,  X  ThedefendantwasconvictedofSaleofaCounterfeitControlledSubstance:Thesale,  delivery,ordistributionof   X X XB+ ` hp x X(#Basubstancewhichisrepresentedtobeacontrolledsubstanceandwhichis t substantiallysimilarincolor,shape,size,andmarkingsorlackthereof,toa Z [ScheduleIIcontrolledsubstance]...inorderthatthesubstancemaybesoldasa @ controlledsubstance. &v  X XE.` hp x (#X ETenn.CodeAnn.3917423(a)(3).Heassertsthattheevidencedoesnotestablishthathe  \ representedthearticlehesoldasacontrolledsubstance.Whenadefendant:XXXXchallengesthe B sufficiencyoftheevidence,thisCourtmustreviewtherecordtodetermineiftheevidence ( adducedduringthetrialwassufficient tosupportthefindingsbythetrieroffactofguiltbeyond  areasonabledoubt.SeeTenn.R.App.P.13(e).Indeterminingthesufficiencyoftheevidence,  thisCourtneitherreweighsnorreevaluatestheevidence.SeeStatev.Cabbage,571S.W.2d832,   835(Tenn.1978).NormaythisCourtsubstituteitsinferencesforthosedrawnbythetrierof p!  factfromcircumstantialevidence.SeeLiakasv.State,286S.W.2d856,859(1956).Tothe V"! contrary,thisCourtisrequiredtoaffordthepartyprevailingattrialthestrongestlegitimateview <#" oftheevidencecontainedintherecordaswellasallreasonableandlegitimateinferenceswhich "$r# maybedrawnfromtheevidence.SeeStatev.Tuttle,914S.W.2d926,932(Tenn.Crim.App. %X $ 1995). %>!%  XQuestionsconcerningthecredibilityofthewitnesses,theweightandvaluetobegiven ' #' theevidence,andallfactualissuesraisedbytheevidenceareresolvedbythetrieroffacts,not (#( U U  U  thisCourt.Id.InStatev.Grace,493S.W.2d474,476(Tenn.1973),theTennesseeSupreme  Courtstated, Aguiltyverdictbythejury,approvedbythetrialjudge,accreditsthetestimonyof  thewitnessesfortheStateandresolvesallconflictsinfavorofthetheoryoftheState. |  X XBecauseaverdictofguiltyremovesthepresumptionofinnocenseandreplacesitwitha H presumptionofguilt,theaccusedhastheburdenofillustratingtothisCourtwhytheevidenceis . ~ insufficienttosupporttheverdictreturnedbythetrieroffact.SeeStatev.Tuggle,639S.W.2d  d 913,914(Tenn.1982);Grace,493S.W.2dat476.XXX:X  J  X XTheevidenceestablishesthattheCIsolicitedasalefromthedefendant,whoresponded    byapproachingthedefendant,removinganarticlefromhismouth,andexchangingthatitemfor    thetwentydollarsofferedbytheCI,allwithoututteringasound.Thecruxoftheissue   presentedisoneofintent:Thedefendantobviouslyintendedtosellsomethingfortwenty x  dollars,and,accordingtoexperttestimony,thesolditemgreatlyresembledcrackcocaine.The ^  remainingquestionis,absentaffirmationorrepresentationsfromthedefendant,whetherhe D  intendedthathismerchandisebeunderstoodasacontrolledsubstance.Weconcludethatthe *z  juryheardsufficientprooftoconcludethatsuchwasthedefendantsintent. `  F Ourjurisprudencerecognizesthatthementalstate,anecessaryfactorofalmostallour , criminalstatutes,ismostoftenprovenbycircumstantialevidence,fromwhichthetrieroffact  makesinferencesfromtheattendantcircumstancesandfromwhichthatbodyweighsthe  circumstantialevidence.SeeHallv.State,490S.W.2d495,496(Tenn.1973);Williamsv.  State,552S.W.2d772,776(Tenn.Crim.App.1977);see,e.g.,Poagv.State,567S.W.2d775, t 778(Tenn.Crim.App.1978).Inthiscase,thejurycouldcertainlyhaveinferredfromthe Z defendantsactionsthatheintendedtosellacontrolledsubstance.Clearly,thedefendants @ mannerofconcealment,mannerofdeliveryand,infact,hissilence,supportthepropositionthat &v heintendedtosellanunlawfulsubstance.Further,trialtestimonyestablishedthatthesubstance  \ soldresembledcrackcocaineinsize,colorandshape.Finally,thetestimonyoftheexperienced B CIwhichdescribedtheactionsofthedefendantaswellashisknowledgeofsimilartransactions ( supportedtheinferencethatthistransactionwasintendedasadrugsale.Forthesereasons,we  concludethatsufficientevidencesupportedtheverdict.   X  Sentencing  p!   X  Thedefendantassertsthatthetrialcourterredinweighingtherelevantfactorsandin <#" denyingalternativesentencing.:XXXXThisCourtsreviewofthesentenceimposedbythetrialcourtis "$r# denovowithapresumptionofcorrectness.SeeTenn.CodeAnn.4035401(d).This %X $ presumptionisconditioneduponanaffirmativeshowingintherecordthatthetrialjudge %>!% consideredthesentencingprinciplesandallrelevantfactsandcircumstances.SeeStatev. &$"& Ashby,823S.W.2d166,169(Tenn.1991).Ifthetrialcourtfailstocomplywiththestatutory ' #' directives,thereisnopresumptionofcorrectnessandourreviewisdonovo.SeeStatev.Poole, (#( 945S.W.2d93,96(Tenn.1997). )$)  X XTheburdenisupontheappealingpartytoshowthatthesentenceisimproper.SeeTenn. R+&+  CodeAnn.4035401(d)sentencingcommncomments.Inconductingourreview,weare 8,', 'y= '   '  required,pursuanttoTenn.CodeAnn.4035210,toconsiderthefollowingfactorsinsentencing:   X X XfO,X4` <hDp x X(#f(1)[t]heevidence,ifany,receivedatthetrialandthesentencinghearing;  (2)[t]hepresentencereport; | (3)[t]heprinciplesofsentencingandargumentsastosentencingalternatives; b (4)[t]henatureandcharacteristicsofthecriminalconductinvolved; H   XiO4,X4` <hDp x ,Xi(5)[e]videnceandinformationofferedbythepartiesontheenhancementand . ~ mitigatingfactorsin4035113and4035114;and  d (6)[a]nystatementthedefendantwishestomakeinthedefendantsownbehalf  J aboutsentencing.  0    XlR,X4` <hDp x (#4,XlForareasondiscussedinthefollowinganalysis,wereviewthissentencedenovo.    H.` hp x (#,XH XUndertheCriminalSentencingReformActof1989,trialjudgesareencouragedtouse   alternativestoincarceration.AnespeciallymitigatedorstandardoffenderconvictedofaClass x  C,D,orEfelonyispresumedtobeafavorablecandidateforalternativesentencingoptionsin ^  theabsenceofevidencetothecontrary.SeeTenn.CodeAnn.4035102(6). D   X XIndeterminingifincarcerationisappropriate,atrialcourtmayconsidertheneedto ` protectsocietybyrestrainingadefendanthavingalonghistoryofcriminalconduct,theneedto F avoiddepreciatingtheseriousnessoftheoffense,whetherconfinementisparticularly , appropriatetoeffectivelydeterotherslikelytocommitsimilaroffenses,andwhetherless  restrictivemeasureshaveoftenorrecentlybeenunsuccessfulappliedtothedefendant.See  Tenn.CodeAnn.4035103(1);seealsoAshby,823S.W.2dat169.   X XAcourtmayalsoconsiderthemitigatingandenhancingfactorssetforthinTenn.Code Z Ann.4035113and114astheyarerelevanttothe4035103considerations.SeeTenn. @ CodeAnn.4035210(b)(5);Statev.Boston,938S.W.2d435,438(Tenn.Crim.App.1996). &v Additionally,acourtshouldconsiderthedefendantspotentialorlackofpotentialfor  \ rehabilitationwhendeterminingifanalternativesentencewouldbeappropriate.SeeTenn.Code B Ann.4035103(5). (  X XThereisnomathematicalequationtobeutilizedindeterminingsentencingalternatives.  Notonlyshouldthesentencefittheoffense,butitshouldfittheoffenderaswell.SeeTenn.   CodeAnn.4035103(2);Statev.Boggs,932S.W.2d467(Tenn.Crim.App.1996).Indeed, p!  individualizedpunishmentistheessenceofalternativesentencing.SeeStatev.Dowdy,894 V"! S.W.2d301,305(Tenn.Crim.App.1994).Insummary,sentencingmustbedeterminedona <#" casebycasebasis,tailoringeachsentencetothatparticulardefendantbaseduponthefactsof "$r# thatcaseandthecircumstancesofthatdefendant.SeeStatev.Moss,727S.W.2d229,235 %X $ (Tenn.1986).XXX:X `     h  %>!%  &$"&  X  LengthofSentence  ' #' Y X (#( ThetrialcourtenhancedthedefendantsRangeIsentencefromtheoneyearminimumto )$) oneandonehalfyears.Thatcourtappliedthreeenhancementfactors:(1)thedefendants l*%* previoushistoryofcriminalconvictions;(2)thedefendantspreviousunwillingnesstocomply R+&+ withaprobatedsentence;and(3)thedefendantcommittedadelinquentactasajuvenilethat 8,', wouldconstituteafelonyifcommittedbyanadult.SeeTenn.CodeAnn.4035114(1),(8), -n(-? ( (   (  (20).Inmitigation,thetrialcourtfoundthat(1)thedefendantsconductneithercausednor  threatenedseriousbodilyinjury;and(2)thedefendantlackedsubstantialjudgmentin  committingtheoffensebecauseofhisyouth.SeeTenn.CodeAnn.4035113(1),(6).That | courtgavelittleweight,however,tothesemitigationfactors. b  X XWefindnoerrorinapplicationofthefactors.Enhancementfactor(1),regardingthe . ~ defendantspriorcriminalhistory,wasapplicable,despitebothpriorassaultconvictionsbeing  d misdemeanors.SeeTenn.CodeAnn.4035114(1).Thedefendantsunwillingnesstocomply  J withtheconditionsofasentenceinvolvingreleaseintothecommunitywasalsoproperly  0 applied,althoughhearguesthatnoevidenceestablishedwhytheprobationwasrevoked:The    enhancementfactorisproperlyappliedforprobationviolations,regardlessofthereasonforthe    violation.SeeTenn.CodeAnn.4035114(8);see,e.g.,Statev.Anderson,985S.W.2d9,20   (Tenn.Crim.App.1997)(applyingfactor(8)forpreviousprobationviolation). x   X XFinally,thedefendantwasadjudicateddelinquentasajuvenileforconductthatwouldbe D  afelonyifcommittedbyanadult.SeeTenn.CodeAnn.4035114(20).Therecordshows *z  thatthedefendantwasoriginallychargedwithcommittingespeciallyaggravatedrobberyasa ` juvenile.Thedefendantpleadedguiltytoaggravatedrobberyandwasadjudicatedtobe F delinquent.Aggravatedrobbery,ifcommittedbyanadult,isaClassBfelony.SeeTenn.Code , Ann.3913402(b).Thedefendantarguesthatapplyingthisenhancementfactoressentially  penalizeshimtwicebecausehisoverallpriorcriminalhistorywasalsoconsidered.Wedisagree.  Thedefendantsconductasanadultconstitutedthebasisfortheconsideredcriminalhistory,  whereasthejuveniledelinquencywasconsideredasaseparatematterundertheappropriate t factor.SeeStatev.BrentBrown,No.02C019710CC00419(Tenn.Crim.App.filedOct.26, Z 1998,atJackson)(Enhancementfactor(20)is theexclusivefactorforenhancingasentence @ basedonadefendantsjuvenilerecord.). &v  X XInmitigation,thetrialcourtfoundthatthe defendantscriminalconductneithercaused B northreatenedseriousbodilyinjury.Tenn.CodeAnn.4035113(1).Thetrialcourtalso ( foundthatthe defendant,becauseofyouth...,lackedsubstantialjudgmentincommittingthe  offense.Tenn.CodeAnn.4035113(6).Thetrialcourtaccordedbothmitigatingfactors  minimalweight.Therefore,thetrialcourtsidentificationofrelevantmitigationfactorsfavored   thedefendant. p!   X XThedefendantassertsthathiscareforhischildrenandhisGEDshouldmitigatehis <#" sentence.SeeTenn.CodeAnn.4035113(13)(permittingmitigationthroughtheuseofany "$r# otherfactorconsistentwiththepurposesoftheSentencingReformAct).Itisthedutyofevery %X $ citizenofthisstatetocareforhisminorchildren.SeeStatev.JohnAllenChapman,No.01C01 %>!% 9604CC00137(Tenn.Crim.App.filedSept.30,1997,atNashville)( catchallfactornot &$"& applicablebecause supportofadependentisbylawanobligationandaduty).ButseeStatev. ' #' JerryKeithIvey,No.03C019509CR00292(Tenn.Crim.App.filedDec.3,1996,at (#( Knoxville)(trialcourtcombinedlackofcriminalhistory,goodemploymenthistory,andfamily )$) socialactivityintoasinglemitigatingfactor).Wefindnoerrorinthetrialcourtstreatmentof l*%* theseproposedmitigatingfactors.SeeStatev.CarlM.Hayes,No.01C019509CC00293 R+&+  (Tenn.Crim.App.filedOct.24,1996,atKnoxville)(holdingthatdefendantsfinishinghis 8,', 3 3  3  educationisnotordinarilyamitigatingfactor).Wefindnoerrorinthelengthoftheimposedsentence.      X  AlternativeSentence  |  X   b Thetrialcourtfoundthatincarcerationwasnecessarytoavoiddepreciatingthe H seriousnessoftheoffenseandthatconfinementwasparticularly appropriatetodeterothersfrom . ~ committingthistypecrime.However,adegreeofdeterrenceisuniformlypresentineverycase,  d seeStatev.Michael,629S.W.2d13,1415(Tenn.1982);thus,a findingofdeterrencecannot  J beconclusoryonlybutmustbesupportedbyproof.Statev.Ashby,823S.W.2d166,170  0 (Tenn.1991).Sincetherecordcontainsnosuchspecificproof,weconcludethatthisfactorwas    notproperlyapplied.Weneverthelessconcurwiththetrialcourtsimposedsentence.     X XThedefendant,althoughaRangeIstandardoffender,doesnotenjoythepresumptionof x  favorablecandidacyforalternativesentencing.SeeTenn.CodeAnn.4035102(5),(6) ^  (1997).Attheageoftwentyone,thedefendantsadultrecordalreadycomprisestwoassault D  convictions.Asajuvenile,hepleadedguiltytoanaggravatedrobberychargeinwhichthe *z  victimwasshotintheface.Additionally,thedefendantviolatedthetermsofhisprobationfor ` oneoftheassaultconvictions.Thedefendanthasshownbotha cleardisregardforthelawsand F moralsofsocietyanda failureofpasteffortsatrehabilitation.Tenn.CodeAnn.4035 , 102(5);seealsoStatev.Grigsby,957S.W.2d541,545(Tenn.Crim.App.1997)(RangeII  multipleoffenderdefendantnotpresumedeligibleforalternativesentencingwheredefendant  hadcriminalhistory);Statev.Zeolia,928S.W.2d457,461(Tenn.Crim.App.1996)( inorder  tobenefitfromthepresumption,thedefendantcannothaveacriminalhistoryevincingeithera t cleardisregardforthelawsandmoralsofsocietyorfailureofpasteffortsatrehabilitation) Z (emphasisadded). @  X XThedefendantdoesnotreceivethepresumptioninfavorofalternativesentencingand,in  \ thealternative,therecordprovidesampleevidencerebuttingthepresumption.Thetrialcourt B implicitlyfoundthatthedefendantwasnotamenabletorehabilitationbecausemeasuresless ( restrictivethanconfinementhadprovenunsuccessful.SeeTenn.CodeAnn.4035103(5);see  alsoStatev.JefferyRussellUtley,No.02C019812CC00385(Tenn.Crim.App.,Jackson,filed  Sept.3,1999,atJackson)(totalconfinementwarrantedbecauseofdefendantsfailuretoabide   byrulesandregulationsofpreviousalternativesentences).Furthermore,consideringthatthe p!  defendantwasincarceratedbetweentheagesofsixteenandnineteenandwasonlytwentyone V"! yearsoldatsentencing,weconcludethatthedefendantalsohasalonghistoryofcriminal <#" conduct.SeeTenn.CodeAnn.4035103(1)(A).Althoughthecriminalconductdoesnot "$r# extendforalengthyperiod,itdoescoverthedefendantscompleteadultlife.Thetrialcourt %X $ correctlydeterminedthatthedefendantwasnotafavorablecandidateforalternativesentencing. %>!%  X XSpecificallyconsideringtheCommunityCorrectionsprogram,acandidatesrecordmust ' #'  notdemonstrateapatternofcommittingviolentoffenses.Tenn.CodeAnn.4036106(a)(6). (#( ThetrialcourtfoundthatthedefendantwasnotanappropriatecandidatefortheCommunity )$) Correctionsprogrambecauseofhispatternofcommittingviolentoffenses.Thisfindingis l*%* amplysupportedbytherecord:twoassaultconvictionsandajuvenilerobberyinwhichavictim R+&+ wasshotintheface. 8,',  X -n(- 4y= 4 r  4    B CONCLUSION  |   XWeaffirmthejudgmentandsentencefromthetrialcourt. H  X h___________________________________      ӀJOHNEVERETTWILLIAMS,JUDGE(#(#K(#    h  X]XX ^   X D   8]