ÿWPC< zm¬½óPDEýJq ÎáÛþšî )«›G7 ûÂ,ŠA‹Ï­I…¾roÕî÷ƒô5ãô.ÈôØuä‰h§í8t×ÿÙÿ-øPœüÄ8„ Ëž™©j ?é›Å ;½@ÅVp¯S Ã8?«ÐÒ¤¾dÇXKÄ™3ZØ“!ÃUª@Û:ý € û<6±aj›‚~Lˆ¶¹2œvî¼­F²ÄˆÚüUŠ„,:ü4ŠôkU=íWMö´Ùæí¥8!:Ãß_¬¿Aº4þÎ×ϯ—d±ŽûsŽGÃ… »ùû˜¯g]vКÚ¸•SÊŠ¶ÁyRSÑ)'ø€•²Ô9¦b‘t™ÆEýçg‘ä|RŽê‰Ë'Dʋ˘…¬²hg…ßÊHád؇¡0³°ZJ8 ”Ø=OÆåc¸R¥Ô§a–øÊ‚¶Ù‹Mâ/wÀìv©ÒÖ¡<Á?ù7_JÀ£A{b§~ÒŒN¿œúY»8³¾Ð–²LGÚŸ¡9ݹìP¼)|Ÿ¸ª’»Ôâ´œ! Ü,¾S:Z2ÇKò€4ú«!bpœUÊ!“d#ù‚H^e…—y¡˜;Êš–08ªPÝÌ ^NéÛmóŸr+Pðè?hÎÖ¡,ÜY%b %\^ b 0§nU Nwc4g{ zŠÒ Ö mØ #Áï ° Ƹ Æ~ ÆD Æ  NÐÐÐEÒÒÒÒÒÒÒÒÒÒÒÒÒÒÒÒÒÒÒÒÒÒÒÒbÔÔÔÔÔÔÔÔÔÔÔÔÔÔÔÔÔÔÔÔÔÔÔÔÔÔÔÔÔÔÔÔÔÔÔÔ 0 ÜÜÜÜ Bææ 0à D3Æ D-ù 0K&& ASqÆÄ 0Ê 0DM A«‘»™ì( (~‚$¡¡Ô€X X»»ÔÑ€..ÑÑ8€ XXdð»»d8ÑÑ ýý ÑÓ  Ó(í€"  Z6Times New Roman RegularÖJ~' œ3|x ˜C:\PROGRA~1\COREL\WORDPE~1\TEMPLATE\CUSTOM~1\REVISE~1.WPTC:\Program Files\Corel\WordPerfect Office 2000\Template\Custom WP Templates\revised standard opinion.wptÿU‹ÿÀÀÀ˜HP LaserJet 4000 Series PCL 6ÈÈÈÈÈÈÈÈ0 Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5‚Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5„Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5…Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5- ù-(›G2å÷$¤¤Ý ƒ~‚!ÝÔ€X}ÌX»»ÔÑ€.ÑÑ8€}ÌXXdæd8ÑÑ ý ÑÓ  ÓÝ  Ýà  àòòÚ  Ú0Ú  ÚóóÔ€X}ÌXXX}ÌÔ d(›3í$££Ý ƒ~‚!ÝÔ€X}ÌX»»ÔÑ€.ÑÑ8€}ÌXXdæd8ÑÑ ý ÑÓ  ÓÝ  ÝVVVV'ÿÿdxd)!ÈÈÈÈdxdx( ±þ$’’ò òFigure€Ú  Ú1Ú  Úó ó^_X`YEþÿ<<CÿÿƒLevel 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5(›3í$¢¢Ý ƒ~‚!ÝÔ€X}ÌX»»ÔÑ€.ÑÑ8€}ÌXXdæd8ÑÑ ý ÑÓ  ÓÝ  Ý($$””ò òÚ  Ú1Ú  Úó óX[Z&OLE 2.0 Box <=8ÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿCÿÿ HKKKKÝ ƒ~‚!ÝÔ€XcìX»»ÔÑ€.ÑÑ8€cìXXdædÈ8ÑÑ ý ÑÓ  ÓÝ  ÝÔ_ÔÑ  Ñà@î î ìàIN€THE€COURT€OF€CRIMINAL€APPEALS€OF€TENNESSEEˆÐ ° Ðà@$ìàAT€NASHVILLEˆÐ –æ ÐÌò òÓ  ÓSTATE€OF€TENNESSEE€òòóóv.€JOSEPH€S.€Ô_ÔBURRISÔ_Ô,€JR.€òòóóó ó€€€€Ð b² ÐÓCÓÌà@YY ìàò òExtraordinary€Appeal€from€the€Circuit€Court€for€Rutherford€CountyˆÐ . ~ Ðà@  ìàNos.€F„47015,€F„46978€€€€€J.€Steve€Daniel,€JudgeˆÐ  d ÐÌÌà@ìì*ìàßA€V) °°` d€÷E<Å ` A߈Ð Æ   ÐÌà@ˆ ˆ ìàNo.€01C01„9907„CC„00247€„€Decided€July€12,€2000ˆÐ »  Ѐ€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€No.€M1999„01059„CCA„R10„CDÐ ¡ñ  ÐßA€V) °°` dE<†` AßÐ ‡×  Ðó óÌDefendant€brought€extraordinary€appeal€to€challenge€trial€court's€decision€to€withdraw€acceptanceÐ |Ì  Ðof€Defendant's€guilty€plea€following€clarification€of€the€terms€of€the€plea.€€We€hold€that€the€trialÐ b²  Ðcourt€properly€exercised€its€authority.€€The€case€is€remanded€for€continuation€of€proceedingsÐ H˜  Ðconsistent€with€this€opinion.Ð .~ ÐÌò òTenn.€R.€App.€P.€10€Extraordinary€Appeal;€Decision€of€the€trial€court€Affirmed,€RemandedÐ úJ Ðfor€continuation€of€proceedings.ó óÐ à0 ÐÌòòÔ_ÔWoodallÔ_Ô,€J.óó€delivered€the€opinion€of€the€court,€in€which€òòWade,€Ô_ÔP.J.Ô_Ôóó€and€òòÔ_ÔWittÔ_Ô,€J.óó€joined.Ð ¬ü ÐÌDarrell€L.€Ô_ÔScarlettÔ_Ô,€Murfreesboro,€Tennessee€for€the€appellant,€Joseph€S.€Ô_ÔBurrisÔ_Ô,€Jr.€Ð xÈ ÐÌPaul€G.€Summers,€Attorney€General€and€Reporter,€Kim€R.€Helper,€Assistant€Attorney€General,€andÐ D” ÐWilliam€C.€Ô_ÔWhitesellÔ_Ô,€Jr.,€District€Attorney€General,€for€the€appellee,€State€of€Tennessee.Ð *z ÐÌà@55'ìàò òOPINIONó óˆÐ öF ÐÌòòóóà  àIn€this€extraordinary€appeal€Defendant€challenges€the€trial€court's€decision€to€withdrawÐ Â  Ðacceptance€of€Defendant's€guilty€plea€following€clarification€of€the€terms€of€the€plea.€€We€hold€thatÐ ¨ ø! Ðthe€trial€court€properly€exercised€its€authority€when€it€withdrew€its€initial€acceptance€of€Defendant'sÐ Ž!Þ" Ðplea.€€The€trial€courtððs€action€is€consistent€with€the€Tennessee€Rules€of€Criminal€Procedure,€and€isÐ t"Ä# Ðnot€barred€by€the€double€jeopardy€clauses€of€the€state€and€federal€constitutions.€€We€thus€affirm€theÐ Z#ª$ Ðdecision€of€the€trial€court,€and€remand€the€case€for€further€proceedings€consistent€with€this€opinion.Ð @$% ÐÌò òÓ  ÓI.€€Facts€and€Procedural€Backgroundó óÐ  &\!' ÐÓ ÓÌà  àDefendant€was€indicted€on€March€1,€1999,€case€number€46978,€for€possession€of€marijuana,€Ð Ø'(#) Ðpossession€of€cocaine€with€intent€to€sell€or€deliver,€theft€less€than€$500€in€value,€and€possession€ofÐ ¾($* Ðdrug€paraphernalia.€€On€March€3,€1999,€in€case€number€47015,€Defendant€was€indicted€for€Class€BÐ ¤)ô$+ Ðfelony€possession€of€over€26€grams€of€cocaine€with€intent€to€sell€or€deliver,€and€possession€ofÐ Š*Ú%, Ðmarijuana.Ð p+À&- Ðâ âÐ V,¦'.ý ÐÔ_Ôà  àDefendant€negotiated€a€plea€agreement€in€the€above€indictments.€€As€to€number€46978,Ð ° Ðâ âDefendant€agreed€to€plead€guilty€to€a€reduced€charge€of€attempt€to€possess€less€than€.5€grams€ofÐ –æ Ðcocaine,€and€possession€of€marijuana.€€The€theft€count€and€the€count€alleging€possession€of€drugÐ |Ì Ðparaphernalia€were€to€be€dismissed.€€As€to€number€47015,€Defendant€agreed€to€plead€to€the€ClassÐ b² ÐB€felony€charge€of€possession€of€more€than€òò.5€gramsóó€of€cocaine€with€intent€to€sell€or€deliver€(he€wasÐ H˜ Ðindicted€for€possession€of€more€than€26€grams),€and€possession€of€marijuana.Ð . ~ ÐÌà  àDefendant€plead€guilty€on€April€13,€1999.€€The€trial€court€accepted€the€plea€at€the€guilty€pleaÐ ú J Ðhearing€and€sentenced€Defendant€to€the€agreed€upon€sentences.€€On€indictment€46978€Defendant€wasÐ à 0 Ðsentenced€to€2€years€for€the€cocaine€charge€and€11€months,€29€days€for€the€marijuana€charge.€€OnÐ Æ   Ðindictment€47015€Defendant€was€sentenced€to€8€years€for€the€cocaine€charge€and€11€months,€29€daysÐ ¬ ü  Ðfor€the€marijuana€charge.€€The€sentences€for€both€marijuana€charges€were€to€run€concurrently€withÐ ’â  Ðthe€sentence€for€cocaine€possession€in€indictment€47015.€€The€sentence€for€cocaine€possession€inÐ xÈ  Ðindictment€46978€was€to€run€consecutively€to€that€for€cocaine€possession€in€number€47015.€Ð ^®  ÐDefendantððs€effective€sentence€was€10€years.€€The€only€issue€that€remained€was€whether€DefendantÐ D”  Ðwould€receive€a€suspended€sentence,€and€the€trial€court€set€a€hearing€date€for€June€14,€1999,€to€allowÐ *z  Ðfor€the€preparation€of€a€presentence€report.€€A€final€judgment€reflecting€Defendantððs€plea€was€notÐ ` Ðentered€in€the€record.Ð öF ÐÌà  àAt€the€subsequent€sentencing€hearing€it€became€apparent€that€the€trial€court€did€not€have€theÐ Â Ðsame€understanding€of€the€terms€of€the€plea€as€both€the€State€and€Defendant.€€The€trial€court€enteredÐ ¨ø Ðan€order€stating€that€there€was€confusion€as€to€what€charge€Defendant€pled€guilty€to,€and€ordered€aÐ ŽÞ Ðtranscript€of€the€guilty€plea€hearing€to€be€prepared€to€assist€the€trial€court€in€determining€the€termsÐ tÄ Ðof€the€plea.€€After€a€review€of€the€transcript,€the€trial€court€sent€a€letter€to€the€parties€in€which€the€trialÐ Zª Ðcourt€withdrew€its€acceptance€of€the€plea.€€The€trial€court€stated€that€as€to€indictment€47015€the€trialÐ @ Ðcourt€thought€that€Defendant€was€pleading€as€charged,€to€possession€of€more€than€26€grams€ofÐ &v Ðcocaine.€€The€trial€court€stated€that€it€would€not€accept€a€plea€on€that€count€to€any€charge€other€thanÐ  \ Ðthat€set€forth€in€the€indictment,€and€thus€withdrew€the€courtððs€acceptance€of€Defendantððs€plea€on€allÐ òB Ðcounts.Ð Ø( ÐÌà  àDefendant€subsequently€applied€for€permission€to€take€an€extraordinary€appeal€to€this€Court,Ð ¤ô Ðwhich€was€granted.€€Ð Š Ú ÐÌÓ  Óò òII.€€Analysisó óÐ V"¦! ÐÓ;ÓÌà  àDefendant€argues€that€this€Court€must€order€the€trial€court€to€sentence€Defendant€inÐ "$r# Ðaccordance€with€the€terms€of€the€plea€agreement€because€jeopardy€attached€when€the€trial€courtÐ %X $ Ðaccepted€the€plea.€€The€State€agrees€with€Defendant.€€We€disagree.€€In€our€opinion€there€are€twoÐ î%>!% Ðissues€that€must€be€resolved€in€order€to€determine€whether€the€trial€court€had€authority€to€withdrawÐ Ô&$"& Ðacceptance€of€the€pleas.€€First,€we€must€ask€if€the€trial€court€had€the€power€to€withdraw€its€acceptanceÐ º' #' Ðof€the€plea.€€We€answer€this€question€in€the€affirmative.€€As€a€result,€we€next€consider€if€the€doubleÐ  (ð#( Ðjeopardy€clauses€of€the€United€States€Constitution€and€the€Constitution€of€the€State€of€TennesseeÐ †)Ö$) Ðlimit€the€power€of€the€trial€court€to€so€vacate€the€plea.€€We€think€they€do€not.€€Ð l*¼%* Ðâ âà  àÐ R+¢&+ Ðà  àInitially€we€note€that€there€is€no€absolute€right€to€have€a€plea€agreement€accepted€by€the€trialÐ ° Ðâ âcourt.€€òòState€v.€Turneróó,€713€S.W.2d€327,€329€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.€1986)€(citing€òòSantobello€v.€NewÐ –æ ÐYorkóó,€404€U.S.€257€(1971)).€€The€ultimate€decision€whether€to€accept€or€reject€a€particular€pleaÐ |Ì Ðbargain€agreement€rests€entirely€with€the€trial€court,€and€a€prerequisite€to€the€effectiveness€andÐ b² Ðenforcement€of€the€plea€is€its€approval€by€the€court.€€òòId.óó€€Ð H˜ ÐÌà  àHere,€the€trial€court€set€aside€the€plea€after€the€court€accepted€the€plea,€but€before€the€entryÐ  d Ðof€judgment.€€Although€no€statute€or€rule€of€procedure€specifically€provides€for€such€an€action€weÐ ú J Ðthink€that€this€decision€is€within€the€inherent€power€of€the€trial€court€to€correct€its€own€error€inÐ à 0 Ðconnection€with€accepting€a€plea.€€òòSeeóó€òòKisloff€v.€Covingtonóó,€73€N.Y.2d€445,€450,€539€N.E.2d€565,Ð Æ   Ð568€(N.Y.€1989).€€In€this€regard€Rule€32(f)€of€the€Tennessee€Rules€of€Criminal€Procedure€isÐ ¬ ü  Ðillustrative.€€Rule€32(f)€governs€when€a€òòdefendantóó€moves€to€set€aside€a€guilty€plea€after€the€plea€hasÐ ’â  Ðbeen€accepted€by€the€court.€€The€rule€provides:€Ð xÈ  ÐÌÒ°ÒÒ°Òa€motion€to€withdraw€a€plea€of€guilty€may€be€made€upon€a€showing€by€the€defendantÐ D”  Ðof€any€fair€and€just€reason€only€before€sentence€is€imposed;€but€to€correct€manifestÐ *z  Ðinjustice,€the€court€after€sentence,€but€before€the€judgment€becomes€final,€may€setÐ ` Ðaside€the€judgment€of€conviction€and€permit€the€defendant€to€withdraw€the€plea.Ð öF ÐÒ°Í$ÒÌÒ°ÒTenn.€R.€Crim.€P.€32(f).€€This€rule€does€not€create€a€trial€courtððs€power€to€set€aside€a€guilty€plea,€butÐ Â Ðinstead€limits€the€courtððs€discretion€by€creating€requirements€that€must€be€satisfied€before€aÐ ¨ø Ðdefendant€may€benefit€from€that€power.€€As€a€result,€the€rule€makes€clear€that€a€trial€court€doesÐ ŽÞ Ðindeed€have€the€power€to€set€aside€a€guilty€plea€after€the€plea€is€accepted€by€the€court.€€We€note,Ð tÄ Ðhowever,€that€after€judgment€has€been€entered€a€trial€court€does€not€have€the€inherent€power€toÐ Zª Ðwithdraw€its€acceptance€of€the€plea.€€òòSeeóó€òòKisloffóó,€73€N.Y.2d€at€452,€539€N.E.2d€at€569.€€This€is€alsoÐ @ Ðconsistent€with€our€case€law€regarding€a€defendantððs€attempt€to€withdraw€a€guilty€plea.€€OnceÐ &v Ðjudgment€has€been€entered,€the€only€avenue€available€to€a€defendant€seeking€to€withdraw€a€plea€isÐ  \ Ða€collateral€proceeding€under€the€Post„conviction€Procedure€Act.€€òòSeeóó€òòState€v.€Antonio€DemonteÐ òB ÐLyonsóó,€No.€01C01„9508„CR„00263,€1997€WL€469501,€at€*6,€€Davidson€County€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.,Ð Ø( ÐNashville,€Aug.€15,€1997)€(òòno€Rule€11€application€filedóó).Ð ¾ ÐÌà  àWe€also€hold€that€the€double€jeopardy€clauses€of€the€federal€and€Tennessee€constitutions€doÐ Š Ú Ðnot€limit€the€action€taken€by€the€trial€court.€€Defendant€argues€that€jeopardy€attached€when€the€trialÐ p!À  Ðcourt€unconditionally€accepted€Defendantððs€guilty€plea.€€The€State€agrees€with€Defendant,€and€asksÐ V"¦! Ðthat€we€instruct€the€trial€court€to€reinstate€the€plea€and€sentence€Defendant€consistent€with€the€pleaÐ <#Œ" Ðagreement.€€We€do€not€agree.€€After€careful€reflection,€and€considerable€research,€we€conclude€thatÐ "$r# Ðprohibitions€against€double€jeopardy€do€not€require€Defendantððs€plea€to€be€reinstated.Ð %X $ ÐÌà  àThree€fundamental€protections€are€encompassed€in€the€principle€of€double€jeopardy:€€(1)Ð Ô&$"& Ðprotection€against€a€second€prosecution€after€an€acquittal;€(2)€protection€against€a€second€prosecutionÐ º' #' Ðafter€conviction;€and€(3)€protection€against€multiple€punishments€for€the€same€offense.€€òòState€v.Ð  (ð#( ÐDentonóó,€938€S.W.2d€373,€378€(Tenn.€1996)€(citations€omitted).€€The€policy€underlying€doubleÐ †)Ö$) Ðjeopardy€is€that€the€State,€with€all€its€resources,€should€not€be€able€ð ðto€make€repeated€attempts€toÐ l*¼%* Ðconvict€an€individual€for€an€alleged€offense,€thereby€subjecting€him€to€embarrassment,€expense€andÐ R+¢&+ Ðordeal€and€compelling€him€to€live€in€a€continuing€state€of€anxiety€and€insecurity,€as€well€asÐ 8,ˆ', Ðenhancing€the€possibility€that€even€though€innocent€he€may€be€found€guilty.ðð€€òòState€v.€Smithóó,€871Ð ° ÐS.W.2d€667,€671€(Tenn.€1994)€(quoting€òòGreen€v.€United€Statesóó,€355€U.S.€184,€187„88€(1957)).Ð –æ ÐÌà  àThe€starting€point€for€a€double€jeopardy€analysis€in€the€context€of€a€guilty€plea€is€ourÐ b² ÐSupreme€Courtððs€decision€in€òòState€v.€Toddóó.€€654€S.W.2d€379€(Tenn.€1983).€€Todd€was€indicted€forÐ H˜ Ðsecond€degree€murder€and€agreed€to€plead€guilty€to€voluntary€manslaughter.€€òòId.óó€at€380.€€The€trialÐ . ~ Ðjudge€agreed€to€the€reduction€in€the€charge,€but€rejected€the€proposed€sentence.€€òòId.óó€€After€re„Ð  d Ðnegotiation,€the€plea€was€re„submitted€to€the€trial€court,€but€the€court€did€not€agree€with€the€newÐ ú J Ðpunishment€terms.€€òòId.óó€at€381.€€When€the€trial€court€was€informed€that€the€punishment€proposed€wasÐ à 0 Ðthe€maximum€available€under€the€law€for€voluntary€manslaughter,€the€court€refused€to€accept€theÐ Æ   Ðplea.€€òòId.óó€€However,€during€the€plea€hearing€the€trial€court€signed€an€order€reducing€the€charge€toÐ ¬ ü  Ðvoluntary€manslaughter.€€òòId.óó€€The€order€was€not€entered€in€the€minutes,€but€given€to€the€districtÐ ’â  Ðattorney€general.€€òòId.óó€€At€trial€Todd€moved€to€have€the€order€entered€so€as€to€be€made€part€of€theÐ xÈ  Ðrecord.€€The€trial€court€subsequently€granted€the€motion€and€had€the€order€made€part€of€the€recordÐ ^®  Ðòònuncóó€òòproóó€òòtuncóó€as€of€the€date€of€the€trial.€€òòId.óóÐ D”  ÐÌà  àOn€appeal€Todd€argued€that€the€trial€courtððs€order€reducing€the€charge€placed€him€in€jeopardyÐ ` Ðof€being€convicted€of€voluntary€manslaughter,€and€thus€he€could€not€be€tried€for€second€degreeÐ öF Ðmurder.€€òòId.óó€€Our€Supreme€Court€held€that€Todd€could€be€retried€because€the€trial€court€had€notÐ Ü, Ðaccepted€the€plea.€€In€so€holding€the€court€noted€that€to€ð ðraise€a€double€jeopardy€objection€it€isÐ Â Ðfundamental€that€a€defendant€must€have€been€previously€placed€in€jeopardy€on€the€charge.ðð€€òòId.óó€atÐ ¨ø Ð381€(citations€omitted).€€After€a€lengthy€discussion€the€court€held€that€jeopardy€does€not€attach€atÐ ŽÞ Ða€hearing€on€a€guilty€plea€until€the€plea€is€unconditionally€accepted€by€the€trial€court.€€òòId.óó€at€383.€€TheÐ tÄ Ðcourt€concluded:Ð Zª ÐÌÒ°ÒÒ°ÒBecause€defendantððs€plea€was€never€accepted,€jeopardy€never€attached€and€the€trialÐ &v Ðcourt,€therefore,€was€not€prohibited€by€the€double€jeopardy€clause€from€revoking€itsÐ  \ Ðpreliminary€determination€to€reduce€the€charge€as€part€of€plea€negotiations.€€òòUntil€aÐ òB Ðfinal€judgment€is€enteredóó€a€court€is€free€to€reject€the€plea€and€plea€agreement.Ð Ø( ÐÒ°ü;ÒÒ°î;ÒòòÌId.óó€at€383€(citations€omitted)€(emphasis€added).Ð ¤ô ÐÌà  àHere,€it€is€unclear€if€jeopardy€has€attached€under€the€òòToddóó€analysis.€€Unlike€òòToddóó,€the€guiltyÐ p!À  Ðplea€here€was€accepted€on€the€record.€€However,€the€trial€court€did€not€enter€a€final€judgment.€€TheÐ V"¦! Ðplain€language€of€òòToddóó€suggests€that€jeopardy€did€not€attach.€€òòSeeóó€òòid.óó€€òòSeeóó€òòalsoóó€òòUnited€States€v.Ð <#Œ" ÐSantiago„Sotoóó,€825€F.2d€616,€620€(1òòstóó€Cir.€1987)€(interpreting€òòBrown€v.€Ohioóó,€432€U.S.€161€(1977),Ð "$r# Ðand€holding€that€jeopardy€attaches€only€on€sentencing€and€entry€of€final€judgment).€Nonetheless,€weÐ %X $ Ðconclude€that€jeopardy€did€not€attach€because€the€instant€facts€do€not€raise€double€jeopardy€concerns.€Ð î%>!% ÐFirst,€the€double€jeopardy€provisions€in€the€Tennessee€and€federal€constitutions€are€designed€toÐ Ô&$"& Ðprevent€successive€prosecutions€and€multiple€punishmentsð!ðthere€is€no€such€concern€here.€€TheÐ º' #' Ðð ðconstitutional€policy€of€finalityðð€is€not€threatened.€€òòUnited€States€v.€Sanchezóó,€609€F.2d€761,€763€(5òòthóóÐ  (ð#( ÐCir.€1980).€€Nor€is€there€any€threat€of€prosecutorial€overreaching.€€Defendant€ð ðshould€not€be€entitledÐ †)Ö$) Ðto€use€the€Double€Jeopardy€Clause€as€a€sword€to€prevent€the€State€from€completing€its€prosecution,ððÐ l*¼%* ÐòòOhio€v.€Johnsonóó,€467€U.S.€493,€502€(1984),€when€the€policies€behind€the€clause€are€not€at€issue€andÐ R+¢&+ Ðthe€ends€of€justice€will€be€defeated€through€a€mechanical€application€of€the€clause.€€We€note€thatÐ 8,ˆ', Ðother€jurisdictions€have€reached€similar€conclusions€when€addressing€double€jeopardy€claims€in€theÐ ° Ðcontext€of€a€guilty€plea.€€òòSeeóó€òòSantiago„Sotoóó,€825€F.2d€at€619;€òòState€v.€Duvalóó,€156€Vt.€122,€589€A.2dÐ –æ Ð321€(Vt.€1991)€(withdrawal€of€acceptance€of€guilty€plea€by€trial€court€did€not€violate€doubleÐ |Ì Ðjeopardy).Ð b² ÐÌà  àWe€reach€the€above€result€primarily€because€the€miscommunication€between€the€parties€andÐ . ~ Ðthe€trial€court€is€reflected€in€the€record.€€At€the€guilty€plea€hearing€the€following€colloquy€took€place:Ð  d ÐÌÒ°ÒÒ°ÒCourt:à0 ` àà0¸ ` Ð ` Ð àAre€you€clear€thinking€and€understanding€what€youððre€doing€today,Ð à 0 Ðfree€from€all€drugs€and€alcohol?ÐÆ  ¸ Ð ¸ Ð  ÐÌDefendant:à0 ¸ àYes,€sir.Ð’â ¸ Ð ¸ Ð  ÐÌCourt:à0 ` àà0¸ ` Ð ` Ð àDo€you€understand€what€youððre€charged€with€in€the€first€case€is€aÐ ^®  ÐClass€B€Felony€[Indictment€#€47015],€the€amount€of€drugs€being€wellÐ D”  Ðin€excess€of€.5€grams.€€òòAnd€that€that€carries€with€it€8€to€30€years€in€theÐ *z  Ðstate€penitentiary€and€a€$250,000€fineóó€(sic)€òòbecause€of€the€weight€ofÐ ` Ðthe€drugsóó?€(emphasis€added)ÐöF¸ Ð ¸ Ð  ÐÌDefendant:à0 ¸ àYes,€sir.и Ð ¸ Ð  ÐÌCourt:à0 ` àà0¸ ` Ð ` Ð àDo€you€understand€that€possession€of€marijuana€is€a€Class€AÐ ŽÞ ÐMisdemeanor,€carries€with€it€up€to€11€months€and€29€days€in€thatÐ tÄ Ðparticular€case?ÐZª¸ Ð ¸ Ð  ÐÌDefendant:à ` àà0 ¸ àYes,€sir.Ð&v¸ Ð ¸ Ð  ÐÌCourt:à0 ` àà0¸ ` Ð ` Ð àIf€you€enter€a€plea€in€that€first€count,€youððre€accepting€an€8€yearÐ òB Ðsentence€òòand€pleading€as€chargedóó.€€Do€you€understand€that?ÐØ(¸ Ð ¸ Ð  Ðà ` àà ¸ à(emphasis€added)€Ð ¾ ÐÌDefendant:à0 ¸ àYes,€sir.Њ Ú¸ Ð ¸ Ð  ÐÌCourt:à0 ` àà0¸ ` Ð ` Ð àAnd€youððre€accepting€a€$3,000€fine?ÐV"¦!¸ Ð ¸ Ð  ÐÌDefendant:à ` àà0 ¸ àYes,€sir.Ð"$r#¸ Ð ¸ Ð  Ð.€.€.€.Ð %X $ ÐÌCourt:à0 ` àà0¸ ` Ð ` Ð àAll€right.€€Then€in€the€next€case,€46978,€Count€Number€1,€againÐ Ô&$"& Ðyouððre€charged€with€a€Class€B€Felony,€possession€of€cocaine€over€.5Ð º' #' Ðgrams.€€That€carries€8€to€30€years.€€But€youððre€pleading€to€the€òòreducedÐ  (ð#( Ðchargeóó€of€attempt€to€sell€less€than€.5€grams,€which€would€be€a€DÐ †)Ö$) ÐFelony.€€And€youððre€accepting€a€2€year€sentence€there?€€(emphasisÐ l*¼%* Ðadded)ÐR+¢&+¸ Ð ¸ Ð  ÐÐ 8,ˆ', ÐDefendant:à ` àà0 ¸ àYes,€sir.а¸ Ð ¸ Ð  Ð.€.€.€.Ð –æ ÐÌCourt:à0 ` àà0¸ ` Ð ` Ð àCase€Number€47015,€Count€Number€1,€to€the€charge€of€feloniousÐ b² Ðpossession€of€over€.5€grams€of€cocaine€for€the€purpose€of€sale€orÐ H˜ Ðdelivery,€how€do€you€plead?Ð. ~¸ Ð ¸ Ð  ÐÌDefendant:à0 ¸ àGuilty.Ðú J¸ Ð ¸ Ð  Ð.€.€.€.Ð à 0 ÐÌCourt:à0 ` àà0¸ ` Ð ` Ð àCase€number€46978,€Count€Number€1,€òòto€the€charge€reducedóó€ð!ð€of€anÐ ¬ ü  Ðattempt€to€sell€less€than€.5€grams€of€cocaine,€how€do€you€plead€there,Ð ’â  Ðsir?ÐxÈ ¸ Ð ¸ Ð  ÐÌDefendant:à ` àà0 ¸ àGuilty.ÐD” ¸ Ð ¸ Ð  ÐÌÒ°9GÒÒ°+GÒ(Emphasis€added).Ð ` ÐÌà  àWhen€the€language€of€the€trial€court€regarding€the€cocaine€charges€is€compared,€it€is€clearÐ Ü, Ðthat€in€indictment€47015€the€trial€judge€thought€that€Defendant€was€pleading€as€charged€toÐ Â Ðpossession€of€more€than€26€grams€of€cocaine.€€This€is€reinforced€by€the€trial€judgeððs€reference€to€theÐ ¨ø Ðfine€in€indictment€47015;€the€maximum€fine€for€possession€of€more€than€26€grams€of€cocaine€isÐ ŽÞ Ð$200,000,€while€maximum€fine€for€possession€of€more€than€.5€grams€of€cocaine€is€$100,000.€€òòSeeóóÐ tÄ ÐTenn.€Code.€Ann.€39„17„417(b),€(i)€(Supp.€1999).€€Thus€the€judge€did€not€have€the€sameÐ Zª Ðunderstanding€as€the€parties€as€to€the€terms€of€the€plea.€Ð @ Ðà  àò ò¹Ó  ÓIII€ConclusionÐ  \ ÐÓrVÓÌó óà  àWe€hold€that€the€trial€court€properly€exercised€its€power€when€it€withdrew€its€acceptance€ofÐ Ø( ÐDefendantððs€guilty€plea.€€We€also€hold€that€the€constitutional€prohibitions€of€double€jeopardy€do€notÐ ¾ Ðlimit€the€trial€courtððs€actions.€€A€trial€court€may€set€aside€a€guilty€plea,€even€after€the€trial€court€hasÐ ¤ô Ðaccepted€the€plea,€and€not€violate€double€jeopardy€when€(1)€the€trial€courtððs€acceptance€of€the€pleaÐ Š Ú Ðis€premised€on€an€incorrect€understanding€of€the€pleaððs€terms,€and€(2)€that€misunderstanding€isÐ p!À  Ðreflected€in€the€record.€