ÿWPC ´U)„Sú®Ë¿À‰b=ùc=–mî³CŸ † åœpêlk©¾) E¶œÄæÝæa/ô]E6"-}G8jã¥d¶“žÍ’O\Ü¡Ñù­xhž&´ÙMã¹ÊHÅOl¾:2wx„¢X°`Äž¬±Å Ü5Á`“Zé¾›Šm.×ËÀCß7 ){Îí@¤¡Ý$ΆŽ?€0gðèjéQj‘'\Ý |KÓt…G¸Eú™;SÆÛ³× ‰ø·!HôºÀÆ3º@Sa(îwE$×Ìäól$ž°×€‡ŽãoKû29<µŽ–~û5$UK›,–-~MÀ]=0íÃsSUˆª¡>m>ùè$GÕÐû,ÂT j½ði¢]¿pá‚Ç3¡BŠÄ'Œ÷¸ åËÓçnF[ô6Ö{¨^ÛúæÓQòû0åx­ÏÜÃÐÞÏ<5–@áu\E±öñO ûÅÞ“l¾~™¿Ï®ƒ´ôŸz8xÊÛG¡ÚÒ& u÷Ò«Wt¿Ñ„ÿvÛÃ! ­¿Ë0£¯‰à5É*o·ì’5iƒûQôþlëÿål±%>Í: ‚ƒÙ-Jàa@ò»X‰|epYŠï qÛ°[±±p‰ÿH¸b %\^ b 0ˆnU"NöwD4H\ zkÒå· m¹ #ÁÐ Ð Æ‘ ÆW Æ Æã ã N© 0D««Eïñññññññññññññññññññññññbùùùùùùùùùùùùùùùùùùùùùùùùùùùùùùùùùùùù 0ë Bìì 0¤  D3­ D-à 0K   ASXÆ« 0¤q 0D A«Y»Ú¦C)â (`£ª$¡¡Ñ€.ÑÑ8€½­»»d»»d8ÑÑ ý ÑÓ  Ó(í€"  Z6Times New Roman Regularq\;'  3|x ˜C:\PROGRA~1\COREL\WORDPE~1\TEMPLATE\CUSTOM~1\REVISE~1.WPTC:\Program Files\Corel\WordPerfect Office 2000\Template\Custom WP Templates\revised standard opinion.wptÿU‹ÿÀÀÀ˜HP LaserJet 4,ü,,,,,ü0Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5‚Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5„Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5…Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5(#Ã$òòÚ  Ú0Ú  Úóó - ù-(|G2<[$¤¤Ý ƒ£ª!ÝÑ€.ÑÑ8€û”»»dd8ÑÑ ý ÑÓ  ÓÝ  Ýà  àòòÚ  Ú0Ú  ÚóóÔ€ô’Ìò»»Ô d(|3y+$££Ý ƒ£ª!ÝÑ€.ÑÑ8€û”»»dd8ÑÑ ý ÑÓ  ÓÝ  ÝVVVV'ÿÿdxd)!ÈÈÈÈdxdx( ±þ$’’ò òFigure€Ú  Ú1Ú  Úó ó^_X`YEþÿ<<CÿÿƒLevel 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5(|3y+$¢¢Ý ƒ£ª!ÝÑ€.ÑÑ8€û”»»dd8ÑÑ ý ÑÓ  ÓÝ  Ý($$””ò òÚ  Ú1Ú  Úó óX[Z&OLE 2.0 Box <=8ÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿCÿÿ HKKKKÝ ƒ£ª!ÝÑ€.ÑÑ8€û”»»ddÈ8ÑÑ ý ÑÓ  ÓÝ  ÝÔ_ÔÑ  ÑÑ  ÑÔ€¼û”»»»ÔÑ8€î“XXdð»»d8Ñà@ttìàԇû”ÔIN€THE€COURT€OF€CRIMINAL€APPEALS€OF€TENNESSEEˆÐ ° Ðà@WW$ìàAT€KNOXVILLEÔ#†¼û”»îî¼— #ԈРÜ, ÐÓ  Óà @ àà @` àMay€2000€SessionÐ X ÐÔ‡Xî“X»¼û”ÔÌò òÔ#†¼û”»XXî“#ÔSTATE€OF€TENNESSEE€òòóóv.€DANIEL€PATRICK€€BYRDÔ‡Xî“X»¼û”Ôó óÐ  ` ÐÌà@@½½ìàò ò€Appeal€from€the€Criminal€Court€for€Anderson€CountyÐ  h Ðà@@øøìàNo.€98CR0052€€€€€€James€B.€Scott,€JudgeÐ  X ÐÌÌà@@ìì*ìàßA€V) °°` d€÷E<×` AßÐ Ø(  ÐÌà@@TTìàNo.€E1999„01483„CCA„R3„CDÐ ×'  ÐOctober€3,€Ô_Ô2000Ô_ÔÐ Ç  ÐßA€V) °°` dE<¶` AßÐ ·  Ðó óÌÓ  ÓThe€defendant€was€convicted€of€driving€under€the€influence,€second€offense,€and€received€a€sentenceÐ ¶ Ðof€eleven€months€and€twenty„nine€days.€€The€defendant€was€ordered€to€serve€forty„five€days€inÐ ¦ö Ðcontinuous€confinement€and€five€days€on€the€weekends,€with€the€remainder€of€his€sentence€to€beÐ –æ Ðserved€on€probation.€€In€this€appeal€as€of€right,€the€defendant€makes€the€following€allegations€ofÐ †Ö Ðerror:€€(1)€the€trial€court€used€an€invalid€judgment€to€elevate€his€Ô_ÔDUIÔ_Ô€charge€to€a€Ô_ÔDUIÔ_Ô€second;€(2)€theÐ vÆ Ðtrial€courtððs€initial€denial€of€an€appeal€bond€violated€the€Double€Jeopardy€Clause€of€the€United€StatesÐ f¶ Ðand€Tennessee€Constitutions;€and€(3)€the€trial€court€incorrectly€concluded€it€was€not€authorized€toÐ V¦ Ðgrant€work€release€or€periodic€confinement€during€the€defendantððs€mandatory€minimum€period€ofÐ F– Ðincarceration€for€Ô_ÔDUIÔ_Ô.€€After€a€thorough€review€of€the€record,€we€conclude€the€trial€court€did€notÐ 6† Ðcommit€the€above€errors€and€affirm€the€defendant's€conviction€and€sentence.€€€Ð &v ÐÌÓ°Óò òTenn.€R.€App.€P.€3€Appeal€as€of€Right;€Judgment€of€the€Criminal€Court€Affirmedó óÐ V ÐÓÓÌòòÔ#†¼û”»àXî“„#ÔÔ‡Xî“X.¼û”ÔAlan€E.€Glenn,€J.óó,€delivered€the€opinion€of€the€court,€in€which€òòThomas€T.€Ô_ÔWoodallÔ_Ô€óóand€òòJohnÐ æ6 ÐEverett€Williamsóó,€JJ.,€joined.Ð Ö& ÐÌJ.€Thomas€Marshall,€Jr.,€District€Public€Defender;€and€Nancy€Meyer,€Assistant€District€PublicÐ ¶!  ÐDefender,€Clinton,€Tennessee,€for€the€appellant,€Daniel€Patrick€Byrd.Ð ¦"ö! ÐÌPaul€G.€Summers,€Attorney€General€and€Reporter;€Elizabeth€B.€Ô_ÔMarneyÔ_ÔÔ#†¼û”»XXî“c #ÔÔ‡Xî“X»¼û”Ô,€Assistant€Attorney€General;Ô#†¼û”»XXî“§ #ÔÔ‡Xî“X»¼û”ÔÐ †$Ö# ÐJames€N.€Ramsey,€District€Attorney€General;€and€Jan€Hicks,€Assistant€District€Attorney€General,Ð v%Æ $ Ðfor€the€appellee,€State€of€Tennessee.Ð f&¶!% ÐÔ#†¼û”»XXî“ #ÔÓ, ÓÔ‡Xî“X»¼û”ÔÌà@55'ìàò òOPINIONó óÔ#†¼û”»XXî“#ÔÔ‡Xî“X»¼û”ԈРF(–#' ÐÌòòò òÓ  ÓBACKGROUNDÐ &*v%) ÐÓ¹ÓÌó óóóÓ  Óà  àThe€defendant€was€charged€with€driving€under€the€influence€(Ô_ÔDUIÔ_Ô),€second€offense.€€At€trial,Ð ,V'+ Ða€prior€judgment€of€conviction€against€the€defendant€for€Ô_ÔDUIÔ_Ô€was€admitted€to€elevate€the€defendant'sÐ ö,F(, Ðcurrent€charge€to€a€Ô_ÔDUIÔ_Ô,€second€offense.€€The€defendant€was€convicted€of€Ô_ÔDUIÔ_Ô,€second€offense€andÐ æ-6)-ýŽ ÐÔ_Ôreceived€a€sentence€of€eleven€months€and€twenty„nine€days.€€The€defendant€was€ordered€to€serveÐ ° Ðforty„five€days€in€continuous€confinement€and€five€days€on€weekends,€with€the€remainder€of€hisÐ  ð Ðsentence€to€be€served€on€probation.€€After€the€jury€conviction€for€DUI,€the€trial€court€refused€to€allowÐ à Ðthe€defendant€to€remain€on€his€existing€bond€and€set€a€hearing€for€three€days€later€to€set€bond.€Ð €Ð ÐTherefore,€the€defendant€was€taken€into€custody.€€Three€days€later€the€trial€court€set€bond€at€$3,000,Ð pÀ Ðand€the€defendant's€mother€agreed€to€act€as€surety.€€Ð ` ° ÐÌòòò òÓ  ÓVALIDITY€OF€PRIOR€JUDGMENTÐ @  ÐÌóóó óÓ  Óà  àThe€defendant€argues€the€trial€court€improperly€admitted€a€prior€general€sessions€courtÐ  p  Ðjudgment€indicating€he€had€a€previous€DUI€conviction.€€The€defendant€argues€the€judgment€wasÐ `  Ðfacially€invalid€because€it€did€not€show€that€he€was€represented€by€counsel€or€that€his€right€to€counselÐ P  Ðhad€been€waived.€€He€acknowledges€that€there€is€a€signed€waiver€form€stapled€to€the€judgment.€Ð ð@  ÐHowever,€he€argues€that€extraneous€documentation€is€not€satisfactory,€but€rather€the€waiver€must€beÐ à0  Ðevident€on€the€face€of€the€judgment.€€Thus,€he€argues€the€judgment€should€not€have€been€used€toÐ Ð  Ðelevate€his€current€charge€to€a€DUI,€second€offense.Ô#†¼û”»XXî“}#ÔÔ‡Xî“X»¼û”Ô€€Ð À ÐÌà  àA€previous€DUI€conviction€cannot€be€used€to€enhance€the€punishment€for€a€subsequent€DUIÐ  ð Ðconviction,€unless€the€record€of€the€first€conviction€affirmatively€demonstrates€that€the€defendantÐ à Ðwas€either€represented€by€counsel€or€waived€his€right€to€counsel.€€òòState€v.€OððBrienóó,€666€S.W.2d€484,Ð €Ð Ð485€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.€1984);€òòState€v.€James€Todd€Atkinsonóó,€No.€01C01„9712„CC„00558,€1999€WLÐ pÀ Ð97916€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.,€Nashville,€Feb.€18,€1999).€€Presuming€waiver€of€counsel€from€a€silentÐ `° Ðrecord€is€impermissible.€€òòOððBrienóó,€666€S.W.2d€at€485€(citing€òòBurgett€v.€Texasóó,€389€U.S.€109,€88€S.Ð P  ÐCt.€258,€262,€19€L.€Ed.€2d€319€(1967)).€òòóó€However,€the€record€in€this€case€includes€a€signed€waiverÐ @ Ðattached€to€the€judgment.€€Although€it€may€be€a€better€practice€for€general€sessions€courts€to€alsoÐ 0€ Ðsecure€the€defendantððs€signature€on€the€judgment€sheet,€we€consider€the€attachment€sufficient.€€TheÐ  p Ðjudgment€with€the€attachment€is€not€facially€invalid€or€void.€€Thus,€the€trial€court€did€not€err€inÐ ` Ðallowing€the€State€to€use€the€prior€conviction.€Ð P ÐÌÓ  Óò òòòDENIAL€OF€APPEAL€BONDóóó óÐ à0 ÐÌÓ  Óà  àThe€defendant€argues€that€the€trial€courtððs€revocation€of€bond€after€the€jury€verdict€andÐ À! Ðrefusal€to€set€bond€for€three€days€resulted€in€a€violation€of€€the€Double€Jeopardy€Clause€of€the€UnitedÐ °"  ÐStates€and€Tennessee€Constitutions.€€Thus,€he€argues€the€three€days€he€spent€in€incarcerationÐ  #ð! Ðamounts€to€additional€punishment€and€bars€further€punishment€for€the€same€conviction.€€Ð $à" ÐÌà  àThe€trial€judge,€upon€receiving€the€jury€verdict,€ð ðrevokedðð€bond€and€stated€ð ð[the€defendant]Ð p&À!$ Ðwill€be€in€the€custody€of€the€sheriff.ðð€€Upon€being€requested€to€set€bond€as€a€matter€of€right,€the€trialÐ `'°"% Ðjudge€stated,€ð ð€I€am€not€refusing€to€set€bond,€I€am€not€going€to€set€one€at€this€time.ðð€€The€trial€judgeÐ P( #& Ðsubsequently€explained€that,€pursuant€to€Tennessee€Code€Annotated€ðð€40„11„130,€he€was€requiredÐ @)$' Ðð ðto€revoke€a€bond€unless€there€is€proof€that€the€person€can€be€on€the€bond€that€was€made€for€hisÐ 0*€%( Ðappearance€.€.€.€€[T]he€defendant€must€make€a€new€bond€for€appeal€to€the€Court€of€Criminal€AppealsÐ  +p&) Ðunless€the€judge€specifically€finds€the€bond€to€be€sufficient.ðð€€The€trial€judge€also€stated€that€it€couldÐ ,`'* Ðnot€force€the€current€bonding€company€to€remain€on€the€bond.€€The€court€stated,€ð ðI€donððt€think€I€canÐ ° Ðsay€to€them:€if€they€made€a€contract€with€this€young€man,€it€is€to€follow€all€the€way€through€theÐ  ð Ðsystem.ðð€€The€trial€judge€agreed€to€set€bond€three€days€later,€which€he€did.€€The€defendant€wasÐ à Ðincarcerated€during€this€three„day€period.€€Ð €Ð ÐÌò òÓ  Óà @ àA.€€Right€to€BondÐ ` ° ÐÓ¤#ÓÌó óà  àWe€respectfully€disagree€with€the€trial€courtððs€interpretation€of€Tennessee€Code€AnnotatedÐ @  Ððð€40„11„130.€€Tennessee€Code€Annotated€ðð€40„11„130(a)€provides€as€follows:Ð 0 € ÐÌà8  àà8` Ð Ð àWhere€the€defendant€in€a€criminal€case€executes€a€bond€orÐ `  Ðrecognizance€before€any€court€or€other€person€authorized€by€law€toÐ P  Ðtake€the€same€for€the€defendantððs€personal€appearance€before€a€courtÐ ð@  Ðto€answer€a€criminal€charge,€such€bond€or€recognizance€shall€be€validÐ à0  Ðand€binding€upon€the€defendant€and€the€defendantððs€sureties€thereonÐ Ð  Ðuntil€the€time€allowed€by€law€for€the€defendant€to€appeal€a€finding€ofÐ À Ðguilt€to€the€court€of€criminal€appeals.€€If€the€defendant€timely€appeals,Ð ° Ðthe€defendant€shall€be€required€to€make€a€new€bond€to€the€court€ofÐ  ð Ðcriminal€appeals€unless€the€trial€judge,€after€examination€of€theÐ à Ðoriginal€bond,€shall€set€out€in€a€written€order€that€such€original€bondÐ €Ð Ðis€sufficient.€€The€court€shall€use€its€discretion€in€determining€whetherÐ pÀ Ðthe€bond€at€issue€should€be€changed.€€No€presumption€is€otherwiseÐ `° Ðintended€to€be€raised€in€this€section.€€If€the€time€for€appealing€to€theÐ P  Ðcourt€of€criminal€appeals€expires€and€the€defendant€has€not€filed€anÐ @ Ðappeal,€the€bondsman€may€be€required€to€surrender€the€defendant€toÐ 0€ Ðthe€court€for€service€of€sentence.€Ð p` x` x ÐÌThus,€an€appearance€bond€is€binding€upon€the€bondsman€until€the€time€allowed€for€the€defendantÐ P Ðto€appeal€the€finding€of€guilt.€€òòIdòòóó.€€óóA€new€bond€ð ðshall€be€requiredðð€òòif€the€defendant€appealsóó€unlessÐ ð@ Ðthe€trial€judge€determines€the€original€bond€is€insufficient.€€òòIdòòóó.€€óóÐ à0 ÐÌà  àThe€trial€court€was€not€required€to€revoke€bond.€€We€do€note,€however,€that€the€trial€courtÐ À! Ðretains€authority€to€increase€or€decrease€bond€pursuant€to€Tennessee€Code€Annotated€ðððð€40„11„Ð °"  Ð113(a)(3)€and€143,€and€sureties€have€the€authority€to€surrender€a€defendant€and€be€released€on€theÐ  #ð! Ðbond,€provided€statutory€procedures€are€followed.€€òòSeeóó€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðððð€40„11„130(c)€and€137.Ð $à" ÐÌà  àFurthermore,€in€all€misdemeanor€cases€a€defendant€is€entitled€to€a€bail€setting€as€of€rightÐ p&À!$ Ðpending€appeal.€€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€40„26„104;€Tenn.€R.€Crim.€P.€32(d).€€An€automatic€revocationÐ `'°"% Ðbased€upon€a€misdemeanor€conviction€or€a€refusal€to€set€bond€is€in€contravention€of€these€directives.€Ð P( #& ÐÌò òÓ  ÓÐ  0*€%( Ðà @ àB.€€Double€JeopardyÐ ° Ðó óÓ>/ÓÌà  àHaving€determined€the€trial€court€erred€in€refusing€to€set€bond€for€three€days€after€theÐ à Ðconviction,€we€must€determine€whether€double€jeopardy€prohibits€any€further€sentence.€€Ð €Ð ÐÌà  àDouble€jeopardy€refers€to€those€risks€ð ðtraditionally€associated€with€actions€intended€toÐ ` ° Ðauthorize€criminal€punishment€to€vindicate€public€justice.ðð€€òòBreed€v.€Jonesóó,€421€U.S.€521,€529,€95Ð P   ÐS.Ct.€1778,€1786,€44€L.€Ed.€2d€346€(1975).€€Thus,€the€inquiry€is€whether€the€challenged€action€wasÐ @  Ðð ðpunitiveðð€as€opposed€to€ð ðremedial.ðð€€òòState€v.€Penningtonóó,€952€S.W.2d€420,€422„23€(Tenn.€1997);Ð 0 € ÐòòState€v.€Coolidgeóó,€915€S.W.2d€820,€823€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.€1995).€€Bail€revocation€is€not€essentiallyÐ  p  Ðcriminal,€but€is€a€ð ðregulatory€function€rather€than€a€criminal€one.ðð€€òòPenningtonóó,€952€S.W.2d€at€422Ð `  Ð(quoting€òòUnited€States€v.€Grisantióó,€4€F.3d€173,€175€(2òòndóó€Cir.€1993)).€€Ð P  ÐÌà  àEven€though€the€trial€court€erred€in€revoking€bond€and€refusing€to€set€bond€for€three€daysÐ à0  Ðfollowing€the€verdict,€double€jeopardy€was€not€implicated.€€Though€perhaps€difficult€due€to€the€timeÐ Ð  Ðelement,€the€defendantððs€remedy€was€to€seek€immediate€relief€in€this€court.€€òòSeeóó€Tenn.€Code€Ann.Ð À Ððð€40„11„144(a);€Tenn.€R.€App.€P.€8(a).€€There€is€no€double€jeopardy€violation.Ô#†¼û”»XXî“#ÔÔ‡Xî“X»¼û”ÔÐ ° ÐÌÓ  Óòòò òSENTENCINGÐ à ÐÌÓ  Óó óóóà  àThe€defendant€contends€he€is€eligible€for€work€release€as€a€DUI€second€offender€pursuant€toÐ pÀ ÐTennessee€Code€Annotated€ðððð€41„2„128(c)€(Supp.€1995),€41„2„129(d)€and€41„2„134.€€This€court€hasÐ `° Ðrecently€concluded€that:€€(1)€€a€DUI€second€offense€defendant€sentenced€to€the€county€"jail,"€asÐ P  Ðopposed€to€the€county€"workhouse,"€by€the€"criminal€court"€judge,€as€opposed€to€the€"generalÐ @ Ðsessions"€judge,€is€ineligible€for€work€release€during€the€minimum€period€of€incarceration€underÐ 0€ ÐTennessee€Code€Annotated€ðð€41„2„128,€particularly€where€the€record€reveals€no€"application"€by€theÐ  p Ðsheriff€for€work€release€for€the€defendant;€and€(2)€no€other€statutory€provisions€provide€eligibilityÐ ` Ðfor€work€release€for€DUI€second€offenders€during€the€minimum€mandatory€period€of€incarceration.€Ð P ÐòòState€v.€Kevin€Dewayne€Steenóó,€No.€E1999„02669„CCA„R3„CD€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.,€Knoxville,€Sept.Ð ð@ Ð1,€2000).€€€We€see€no€reason€to€deviate€from€these€holdings.€€Ð à0 ÐÌà  àThe€defendant€further€contends€the€trial€court€erred€in€refusing€to€consider€periodicÐ À! Ðconfinement€during€the€mandatory€minimum€period€of€incarceration.€€We€have€previously€concluded€Ð °"  Ðthat€the€mandatory€minimum€period€of€incarceration€for€DUI€must€be€served€without€interruptionÐ  #ð! Ðby€periodic€confinement.€€òòState€v.€Gurleyóó,€691€S.W.2d€562,€563€(Tenn.€Crim€.App.€1984);€òòState€v.Ð $à" ÐKevin€Dewayne€Steenóó,€òòsupraóó,€slip€op.€at€2.Ô#†¼û”»XXî“×5#ÔÔ‡Xî“X»¼û”Ô€€We,€again,€see€no€reason€to€deviate€from€these€holdings.€Ð €%Ð # ÐÌòòò òÓ>6ÓÔ#†¼û”»XXî“=#ÔÔ‡Xî“X»¼û”ÔCONCLUSIONÐ `'°"% ÐÌó óóóÓ  Óà  àWe€conclude€the€trial€court€properly€allowed€the€state€to€use€the€defendantððs€previousÐ @)$' Ðjudgment€of€conviction€for€DUI€to€elevate€his€current€charge€to€a€DUI,€second€offense;€the€defendantÐ 0*€%( Ðâ âdid€not€suffer€a€double€jeopardy€violation€due€to€his€three„day€post„conviction€incarceration;€andÐ  +p&) Ðneither€work€release€nor€periodic€confinement€was€available€to€this€defendant€during€the€minimumÐ ° Ðmandatory€period€of€incarceration.€€Therefore,€the€judgment€of€the€trial€court€is€affirmed.Ð  ð Ðâ âòòóóÔ#†¼û”»XX=#ÔÔ€Xî“X»¼û”ÔÌÌà  àÌÌà  àà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  à___________________________________€Ð P   Ðà  àà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  àALAN€E.€GLENN,€JUDGE